Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Books Media

Professor Creates His Own Cisco Manual 318

yootje writes "ZDnet is running a story about a professor who made his own Cisco networking textbook, with 800 pages: "Computing instructor Matt Basham's suggestions for improving Cisco Systems' official training manuals fell on deaf ears for years. But he appears to have the networking giant's attention now." The professor made his book available for free on his website."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Professor Creates His Own Cisco Manual

Comments Filter:
  • by slusich ( 684826 ) * <slusich@gmail.COMMAcom minus punct> on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @08:49AM (#9620335)
    It's great to hear a story about someone who took it upon himself to do what was needed. Cisco was obviously not responsive to him, so he goes out and does it on his own. Not only that, he decides to share his work with everyone. Now hopefully Cisco has the common sense not to sue him for his efforts.
  • Eeeeek... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Noryungi ( 70322 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @08:51AM (#9620347) Homepage Journal
    It's a 5.1MB Microsoft Word file.

    Oh the horror... The horror...

    Please, Mr Matt Basham, release this as a PDF, RTF or HTML file... Anything but Word. I ma willing to help if needed.
  • Still Wondering (Score:5, Interesting)

    by swordboy ( 472941 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @08:51AM (#9620350) Journal
    I'm still wondering why the governments don't require free and "open source" text for public schools. In college, the professors used to change the text every semester so that the students couldn't sell the books back at the end of the semester (likely getting kick-backs from the text manufacturers, no doubt).

    If just one state would sit down and even purchase some good works and make them freely available for modification and distribution, then the cost of education would be greatly reduced. Profs would be free to make changes at it fits their style so long as those changes are re-posted to the public. Students could read the texts online and/or print them.

    What am I not seeing here?
  • by Short Circuit ( 52384 ) <mikemol@gmail.com> on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @08:55AM (#9620367) Homepage Journal
    How about republishing Cisco's API without their permission? Cisco probably likes the revenues they get from selling their docs and their training manual.
  • curriculum (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @08:58AM (#9620397)
    How much of the curriculum is specific to Cisco? And if it is specific to Cisco, then isn't that sort of limiting? I'm sure you'll get a thorough grounding in TCP/IP as well, but hell, you can get that from Richard Stevens TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 1.

    I've known several people who have been convinced that getting these Cisco certs will lead to untold riches - they have all been disappointed. It's definitely no substitute for a 4 year degree.
  • by tommasz ( 36259 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @08:59AM (#9620404)
    Cisco has so much of the networking infrastructure market they obviously didn't care about the quality of their documentation. Luckily, there has always been a market for outsiders who can figure things out and explain them to others. Cisco would be smart to work with this guy.
  • finally (Score:4, Interesting)

    by falkryn ( 715775 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:07AM (#9620449)
    good to see somebody doing this. I took the first semester Cisco course at my college, and yeah, the books weren't all that good. I haven't seen his work yet, but I do recall the first semester is exclusively going over the seven layers of the OSI model in sometimes painful detail. Can tend to throw the beginning student off, especially considering the OSI model is not much more than an academic tool anyway, TCP/IP is were its at in the 'real world'.
  • by Short Circuit ( 52384 ) <mikemol@gmail.com> on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:10AM (#9620478) Homepage Journal
    API has become a catch-all term that covers anything having to do with an interface to controlling software.

    And in a day when configuration files are written in scripting languages for everything from video games to "./configure", I don't see a problem with that.
  • Useful Contribution (Score:3, Interesting)

    by XeRXeS-TCN ( 788834 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:11AM (#9620482)

    I think that this is a very useful contribution to anyone who is looking for information on Cisco networking. It's definately a "middle finger" to big companies who are so set in their ways, they are unwilling to take advice from people in the field who have the qualifications and experience to make a genuine contribution to their documentation.

    In many ways, it also reflects the spirit of the Free Software movement, in many respects. It reflects the frustration of a constant refusal to fix issues with something released in what is, in certain respects, a proprietary format, and the result of writing a version, which is then distributed for free. It's good to see :)

    Speaking of which, I wonder if Mr Basham could be convinced to release the text under a free license, like the GNU FDL... possibly not, if he has already made arrangements with publishers, but it might be worth looking into...

  • Bad Self Publishing (Score:4, Interesting)

    by RoscoeChicken ( 73509 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:16AM (#9620508)

    Self-published textbooks will only work when some sort of feedback mechanism is in place to offer an indication of the quality of the book.


    For years, at the University of South Florida in Tampa, the engineering college subjected undergraduates to an extremely poor thermodynamics text self-published by an influential department chair until the thermo scores started to slide on the state EIT exams.

  • by gladmac ( 729908 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:27AM (#9620587) Homepage
    How can they argue that they do not overprice their books [in the US] when you can pick the same book up in Europe, for much less. And what is really funny... it even says on them "Not for sale in the US" [because there we have this really good thing going on with the other publishers about not going below $0.2 per page EVER].
  • Re:finally (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:29AM (#9620610)
    "The OSI model is used to describe the function of a network. TCP/IP can be mapped exactly to the OSI model as a four layer stack."

    The presentation and session layers are lumped into TCP/IP's application layer where they belong. How then, does teaching the OSI model, where these two layers are explicit, help in the student's understanding of network protocols? What useful purpose does teaching the concepts of presentation and sessions have when they are almost orthoganol to the topic at hand? (I'm struggling to come up with examples of applications where the concepts of these two layers are so important that they need to be distinct from the application protocol itself.)

    Using layered protocols to teach networking is good, but the OSI model is a classic example of design by committee and is more confusing than helpful; at least when compared to the TCP/IP model.

  • All it takes is time (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Safety Cap ( 253500 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:50AM (#9620801) Homepage Journal
    What I would try to do is check out the book from the college library and scan or photocopy the relevent chapters. Yes, illegal as hell, but when you're a starving college student, paying US$18 for 600 pages versus $100 for the physical Chem book (if you could sell it back, you'd get something like $30) is much more economical.

    If I recall correctly, not too long ago some folks had the bright idea of ordering their books from Canada/UK. Seems that the same exact textbooks there cost up to 50% less than in the states.

  • Re:Still Wondering (Score:3, Interesting)

    by dave_mcmillen ( 250780 ) * on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:57AM (#9620862)
    I'm still wondering why the governments don't require free and "open source" text for public schools. In college, the professors used to change the text every semester so that the students couldn't sell the books back at the end of the semester (likely getting kick-backs from the text manufacturers, no doubt).

    And later that same thread . . .

    You're exactly right about getting kick-backs . . .

    Oh, yeah! I'm a professor, and you should see the stuff we get from the textbook people: hot and cold running Porsches, massages from scantily-clad young women (or men, if you prefer), big envelopes stuffed with cash . . .

    No, wait, that was all a dream. I must be teaching at the wrong place, because the very most I've ever gotten is the occasional free book and an even more occasional phone call asking if I've considered using book X.

    But you're right that textbooks are hideoulsy overpriced, and it's maddening that the publishers keep changing editions in an effort to force students to buy new rather than used. But it's an awfully big brush you're painting with, when you say that we're all getting kickbacks -- and you're getting paint all over me!
  • by amaffew ( 794407 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @09:58AM (#9620872)
    Thanks guys...I am not a lawyer but have spent several years studying copyright and internet law...I even got the opportunity to lead a session at Harvard Law School one summer. Heck, one of the professors there, Johnathon Zittrain, even downloaded the book...he's an old-school chat room moderator turned internet lawyer...he and his colleagues have even taking pro-bono work to fight for open source rights. I think I have sufficiently covered my assets with respect to the book...it has actually been out for three years and I haven't heard anything so far. Besides I put some really specific phrases in there that help cast aside their chances. Thanks again. I will go out and read all the posts too. You should see the one on www.macpro.se that appeared in swedish! Gratis lärobok för Ciscos kurser Thanks again Matt PS if you download the book shoot me an email and let me know where you are located...I am keeping track on a map. Bashamm@spcollege.edu
  • Me (Score:3, Interesting)

    by simpl3x ( 238301 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:02AM (#9620907)
    I'm a designer, with some technical inclination, and frankly unless I'm engineering mission critical software, most of the concepts are not that difficult. Do this to open port xxx! So, when I needed to look at my IP Sec to understand how it needed to be programed without paying uunet to do it, I looked around for materials. There wasn't much as far as tutorials go, and uunet did do it for free anyway, but it was mostly just lines of "open port xxx." Oooh, punching holes in a firewall. But that saved me a grand, and as a small business person, this matters.
  • by originalhack ( 142366 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:04AM (#9620925)
    The good professor is really trying to study just how many people will blindly open a word doc from an untrusted source. What do you want to bet that opening the document in word triggers a counter somewhere?
  • by homerskid ( 725428 ) <homerskid.gmail@com> on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:07AM (#9620960)
    I've been doing this same thing for years now....guess I just never thought to put it up on /. :-)
    Several years ago, when I was studying for my certs, I decided to compile all my material into a book.
    It has since grown into two separate books, one for the CCNA and one for the CCIE.
    While they used to be free, I decided to begin charging a small fee (10 bux), but only enough to cover the costs of my website -- incidentally, I've never really been able to recoup that.

    If anyone is interested, the books, along with loads of free material are available (both online and downloadable) at gdd.net [gdd.net].
    Please note that I do like for folks to register, but it is free and rather painless ;-).
  • by xtal ( 49134 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:10AM (#9620995)
    This is the future.. it would be nice for fields like electrical engineering, where the core material was discovered and published several hundred years ago - but you still have to pay $200 every year or so for the texts. A standard reference text that could be improved, peer reviewed, and built upon year after year would be a tremendous boon to mankind. I think of all the useless projects and questions I worked out over the years, imagine if that work went towards improving a collective body of information. Perhaps, something like another collaborative effort we know [kernel.org].

    Yes, this won't work for everything. But things like calculus, fourier transforms, electromagnetics, classical signal processing, statics, dynamics, statistics - this is cookie cutter stuff. Should apply right through the grade schools, too. I suppose I should be thankful those things are even allowed to be taught anymore, because you can do naughty things with them. :-)

    I won't tell you how mad it made me lugging close to 100lbs of books around for 5 years when if things were sane, they could be accessed either online, or via pdf files.

    If anyone wants to be a patron saint - opening those materials up would potentially help a lot of people. Books are very expensive. Moreso outside of the western world.
  • Re:Still Wondering (Score:2, Interesting)

    by amaffew ( 794407 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:11AM (#9621005)
    Because the schools are having to rely more and more on self-sustinance. They have to become in reality "for-profit" agencies. The only trouble is they are forgetting about the best interests of the students. I did this as a wake up call, pure and simple...besides, I agree, it should be free to students. The really good teacher/administrators should be able to find grants to pay for equipment. Plus, if they design their curriculum correctly they won't need much of it...my entry-level computer security program has been very well received and received some complaints also...eh, long live open source!
  • Re:Still Wondering (Score:3, Interesting)

    by sphealey ( 2855 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:12AM (#9621035)
    Oh, yeah! I'm a professor, and you should see the stuff we get from the textbook people: hot and cold running Porsches, massages from scantily-clad young women (or men, if you prefer), big envelopes stuffed with cash . . .
    Not very much money in collge publishing compared to elementary school and high school. Richard Feinman recorded in great detail how, as a member of the California state textbook review panel (at least at that time, all textbooks used in California public schools needed the approval of that panel) he was offered all those things and more by textbook publishers. That was in the 70s, but from what I hear (and read in my children's textbooks) it isn't much different today.

    sPh

  • by salutor ( 664890 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @10:16AM (#9621072) Homepage

    The Lulu.com business model is based on a 20% commission on sales. Exact production costs vary depending on the number of pages and delivery format (electronic versions obviously have no production cost), but in all cases authors set their own royalty: they receive that royalty amount for every sale regardless of the production cost or Lulu commission.

    The cost of a printed book to a customer who buys it is:
    $4.53, the base cost for a perfect-bound printed book, + (# of pages x $.02 per page) + author royalty + Lulu commission

    For downloads, the cost is simply the author royalty + Lulu commission. If the author royalty is $4, the Lulu commission would be $1, and the cost to the customer for the book would be $5.

    By the way, Basham's Lulu.com storefront is here: www.lulu.com/learningbydoing [lulu.com]

  • This book sucks (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Animats ( 122034 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @11:36AM (#9622049) Homepage
    • Lesson 1: Finding CISCO's web site.
    • Lesson 2: Opening a "MS-DOS" window on Windows 95/98. (Not an NT-family OS, even though this is a corporate networking class.)
    • Lesson 3: Installing a network card. ("Try to see how a Token Ring NIC differs from an Ethernet NIC.")
    • A little further along, there are chapters on binary arithmetic, hex arithmetic, IP addressing, and the symbols Cisco uses in their manuals. Then, immediately after the chapter on IP addressing, things suddenly get complicated:

      • You are the network administrator for an upstart website publishing company. They have offices in two adjacent buildings on different floors. Lately, they have realized the costs of their individual Internet accounts far exceeds the costs of installing and maintaining a T-1 line. As the network guru you are to design a network that will utilize FDDI between the buildings. The west building uses floors 3, 4, and 5 for the sales and admin staff. Here you will want to use a CISCO Catalyst 5000 with a FDDI module, a management module, and a 24-port switch module. From there each floor will distribute access via a CISCO 1924 switch to each of its 20 nodes (workstations, servers, and printers). The east building uses floors 1 through 5 for the design and engineering staff. Here you will want to use a CISCO Catalyst 5500 with a FDDI module, a management module, and a 24-port switch module. You will also have a CISCO 2610 router with T-1 module, and a Kentrox CSU/DSU for your full T-1 line. Your ISP, ComBase has sold you two blocks of 62 IP addresses: 198.74.56.x (1-62) and (65-126). Combase will also provide the DNS services, unlike most ISP's where more than 24 IP's are ordered. Design your network, including cabling and grounds, to include all IP's, subnet masks, gateways, and anything else you need to include.

      This is before they've mentioned how to configure, operate or use any of that stuff. Wierd.

    Some quotes:

    "Supercomputer--See Nasa, Berkely, MIT, etc. Kind of like the W.O.P.R. in Wargames."

  • by salutor ( 664890 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @11:46AM (#9622163) Homepage

    I would challenge the notion that there is a distinct category of books that are self-published. To some extent the categories of publisher and self-publisher are anachronistic.

    I've made the argument that there is no such thing as self-publishing [salutor.com] in more detail elsewhere, but to summarize:

    • Many independent publishers publish the work of a small number of writers.
    • Many writers establish "publishing companies" to distribute their own work.
    • And at this point, technologies like Lulu.com make publishing accessible to anyone and everyone.

    The real difference, insomuch as there is a difference, is in the branding. O'Reilly [oreilly.com], for example, has a brand that information seekers trust. So an O'Reilly book by an author you've never heard of is probably more appealing than a Lulu.com [lulu.com] book by an author you've never heard of. But what if an author develops his own brand?

    Along those lines, last week I found myself in the middle of a back-and-forth with a prominent tech journalist [infoworld.com]. His position was in essence that most of what is written is crap and that the editorial control exercised by publishers is essential. Fair enough. Most of what's written is crap [spacebar.org], (although that doesn't seem to stop people from buying it when it's put out by major publishers).

    But the dilemma you allude to, as I see it, is comparable to the dilemma presented by the emergence of the World Wide Web itself. "If anyone can put up anything on the Web," railed skeptics, "the whole thing is going to be useless. If you can't find the worthwhile information in the mountains of rotten information, what good will it be?"

    Venerable institutions like the New York Times [nytimes.com] (justifiably) shuddered that individual sites--Matt Drudge's [drudgereport.com], for example--could compete with their own as sources for information. And yet, it has come to be. The Internet provides the means by which authors can develop their own brands. Matt Basham [lulu.com] (the CISCO prof), for example, is in the process of developing his.

  • by mwood ( 25379 ) on Tuesday July 06, 2004 @02:27PM (#9624002)
    And the University's lawyers will laugh at them, unless he used those trademarks in such a way as to promote his own business. Your local newspaper can't be sued for trademark infringement just for printing an article mentioning the company or its products by name.

    If he'd called it _The Official cisco Systems New CCNA/CCNP Training Book_ then they'd likely have grounds for complaint.

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...