Calculator Flaw Forces Recall in Virginia 687
Jivecat writes "CNN is reporting that TI is recalling 11,000 calculators issued to students in Virginia because of a flaw that would give them an unfair advantage on standardized tests. A 12-year-old discovered that by pressing two keys at once, the calculators will convert decimals to fractions. The tests require the students to know how to do this with pencil-and-paper." So the calculator is being recalled because it's not crippled enough. Maybe it's a good time to question the wisdom of issuing expensive electronics to students in the first place, though I'm sure the calculator companies would rather you didn't.
Next To Go: '+' Sign (Score:4, Interesting)
So what if the calculators make it easier to convert from decimal to fraction? Train *all* of the students to use the feature and its value as an advantage.
As for the issue of using a pencil and paper, then that is how you verify that they *know* how to make the conversion and didn't rely on the two-key method.
Bureaucracy masked as education.
A flaw? (Score:2, Interesting)
You sure it is a flaw? Sounds more like a hidden function by a bored programmer to me. Also, what's wrong with the fraction function? My Casio FX-260 S Calculator that I used in ~grade also has a fraction function. No one ever complain about that
That goes to show you (Score:2, Interesting)
In my junior high/high school years(7-12) We rarely got to use calculators. Even in our pre-calculus course, if we got caught using a calculator during a test, exam or inclass assignment we were as good as failed.
This wasn't decades ago, I graduated 2002.
People shouldnt rely on calculators to do simple math like fractions.
Re:Hmm (Score:2, Interesting)
Erm, just which "higher maths" need calculators? I just finished a degree in mathematics, and I was allowed to use a calculator on exactly one test during the entire degree: Numerical Analysis (that is, the approximation of solutions using computational methods).
In high school, I learned how to use a calculator, which let me learn the minimum in calculus (etc) and still get good grades. So I never learned it right, until, after my first degree, I came back for a second one in maths.
I'd just leave it "let them learn to do maths properly."
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
This brings back memories (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:log books (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:ruined (Score:2, Interesting)
My wife and I homeschool. I do the math with our 10-year old daughter. No calculator. For crying out loud, how hard is it to learn how to use a calculator? One day, max? She's not missing a thing. She'll learn how to use it when we get to trig, I suppose.
We do subject her to a standardized test annually. I helped administer it to some older kids--there was a section in the test for those using calculators. We weren't using them, so we ignored it. These kids zipped through anyway. They can make change in their heads, which is a rare skill these days.
I'm Old School: Ban the Calculators!
Re:Next To Go: '+' Sign (Score:1, Interesting)
And I don't accept that "you don't need to be able to count, you have calculators" crappy argument. It trains your brain and you don't always have a calculator nearby.
I used to have a strict math teacher in high school. He would call your name, gave you a simple calculating task and count to 3 (which took like 6 seconds).
-- Mateusz. Come to the blackboard
-- Square root from 5329
-- One...
-- Two...
-- err...
-- Three. 73. You failed. F
I bet most kids nowdays would say it's impossible to count it. I got shitloads of F's this way but I'm incredibly glad. Don't have to click KDE_thingy --> Utilities --> Calculator all the time or panick when I'm outdoors and need to calculate something.
hey timothy, read the article (Score:2, Interesting)
and c'mon... $10 is "expensive electronics?" It's not like they have the 3D graphic calculators with the gameboy emulator.
Re:Next To Go: '+' Sign (Score:4, Interesting)
What is 0.4523232323 as a fraction?
Well, it's easy; the answer's 45/100 + 23/9900, and from there it's regular simplification.
But "everybody" knows how to turn fractions into decimals; it's just long division, whereas with repeating decimals there's a trick.
A teacher you don't have to love... (Score:5, Interesting)
No HP 48's? (Score:3, Interesting)
I took Engineering school about 300 km south, and we were still allowed the HP 48 GX then. Experimentation showed that the reliable communication range was about six inches. If you were that close to your fellow student during an exam, you would already be under suspicion.
I previously had a TI-85 when I went through high school, ending back in 1995. It had the infamous decimal-> fraction conversion.
Re:Next To Go: '+' Sign (Score:5, Interesting)
x = 0.4523232323...
100x = 45.232323232323...
99x = 44.78
9900x = 4478
x = 4478/9900
Re:Other TI Flaws (Score:1, Interesting)
I had a damn good self-hacked version of Tetris, and my fucking biology teacher erased it (yes, you heard me, biology, not math - she merely went around, checked if anyone had a programmable calculator, and erased the memory). Fuck that cocksucking bitch.
Re:Next To Go: '+' Sign (Score:2, Interesting)
While technology is a good thing, I fail to see how exposing students/teaching students specifically with technology is a useful thing. After all, if you can't understand the written basics/principles, how are you going to know how to use a calculator for other functions asides from your basic math? Input the formulas in a program and cheat?
Our school system even allows a student with the same county-approved calculator (but bought on their own) To use it in a test. Who's to say this student didn't program every formula they needed to knwo into the calculator just so they could get ahead in class?
The point I guess I'm trying to make is that calculators should be banned from school, and those that cannot deal with solving a problem by hand, given enough time, shoudl not graduate. It would, to some degree, cut down on the ignorance we have in our school systems today.
To reinforce the point... I asked my local "illegalities" dealer what's 3/4 of 28 grams. He told me, "If I had a calculator I could find out." And this guy "graduated" from high school with a B- avereage. How the hell do you suppose that happened?
Re:Not really (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Next To Go: '+' Sign (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:It's not really about the math. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:No, calculators are different. (Score:3, Interesting)
But the kids do not know what goes on inside the black-box. They have set and get methods to access the data, but lack the understanding.
Therefore, a child does not "know" multiplication.
Along similar lines, programmers do this everyday. They may not know the algorithm for MPEG4, but they can use a library to access the data and manipulate it they way they want.
The big difference here is that basic math is a fundamental life skill, while knowing the MPEG4 algorithm is not.
In life, there are some things that should be learned the hard way (for some, it is the only way they learn). Other things do not need to be.
I wouldn't expect any random person I meet to be able to implent the MPEG4 codec, but I would expect them to be able to tell me what 10x10 is.
Without a calculator.
~X~
Re:log books (Score:1, Interesting)
The problem with that (Score:3, Interesting)
The line of thinking "oh, we'll give programmers a bunch blackboxes and they don't have to know the algorithms behind them" is what got us saddled with co-workers who can't code worth crap. Yes, it's not needed to know the exact MPEG4 algorithm, but without knowledge of at least the basics, well, that's how we got at the point where 3 out of 4 "programmers" can't program.
I see _consultants_ advocating using two arrays for large data sets instead of a hash table. Presumably because they never learned that one is O(1) and one is O(n).
I've seen _two_ co-workers end up debugging into a HashMap (because they were utterly lost when finding their own bugs) and go "Java is broken! It replaced my item in the array with another! My data is lost!" Turns out that they had no fucking clue what a linked list is, and that merely a new node was added to the front of one.
And then there's the one I fondly call Wally, who was attempting basically this:
public void nuller(int x) {
x = 0;
}
public void testNuller() {
int x = 1;
nuller(x);
assertTrue("x should be 0", x == 0);
}
Then did it again later. The concept of "call by value" was utterly lost on him.
Or pointers? Java's syntax hides pointers, making them basically a blackbox. Something that just happens behind the scenes for you. Unfortunately I see people bitten in the ass everyday by utter lack of knowledge of what a pointer is and how it works.
Or then there's security. I've seen consultants from a big corporation implementing a system so full of security holes it wasn't even funny. They honestly thought that just slapping together some blackboxes with lots of buzzwords made them safe. It didn't.
They failed to grasp even basic concepts as "what if the user edits the '?user_id=1234' to '?user_id=0' in the URL and makes themselves super-user?" Yes, that sad. They failed to understand basic concepts like non-repudiation: when someone deleted their own user from that system, the program would helpfully cascade through all tables and erase all tracks that the user ever existed or ever done anything. They failed to even notice they need to quote the user input, both when displaying it in HTML _and_ when using it in an SQL querry. Etc.
Basically anything that wasn't already built in their blackboxes, they were utterly obvlivious to.
So basically, no, I wouldn't expect a random person off the street to implement MPEG4 either, but I'd expect anyone paid as a programmer to know at least the basics (the equivalent of arithmetic in maths) before they're even given a MPEG4 library and told to add that to a program.
Which brings me back to maths: the same is true for maths and a lot of jobs. Even if one decided that 10x10 isn't needed for Burger King jobs, we're not preparing _all_ kids for that kind of jobs. Expecting someone to understand the more advanced maths used in most engineering or science fields when their knowledge of the basics is just "oh, I push these two buttons on a calculator", is IMHO like building a house without the ground floor.
Re:Next To Go: '+' Sign (Score:3, Interesting)
x = 0.99999.....
10x = 9.99999......
9x = 9
x = 1
0.99999.... = 1