Pentagon Wants Screenplays From Scientists 757
Aix writes "According to the New York Times, the Pentagon is funding classes in screenplay writing for 15 scientists. The idea is to encourage kids to go into science and engineering through mainstream media and thereby presumably bolster long-term US national security. While it sounds like a lot of fun for the researchers involved, and anything that stems the spiral of the US into a culture of anti-intellectualism is a good thing in my book. Will glamorizing science in the movies make kids pay better attention in chemistry class?"
glamorous (Score:5, Funny)
In a word, YES.
we should all know by now that kids will immitate anything the movies (or tv) show them. just look at how many injuries were blamed on Beavis & Butthead!
I wonder.. (Score:4, Funny)
Scientific movies!? (Score:2, Funny)
Anti-intellectualinism (Score:5, Funny)
Pot. Kettle. Fragment.
Re:That's why I'm in I.T. (Score:2, Funny)
It Worked for Me! (Score:5, Funny)
Wow! a TROLL in the middle of the editorial! (Score:1, Funny)
What a surprise! Someone's self-important arrogance is immolated by conservatives who are chastising moonbats for their ignorance and stupidity! Oh, that must mean that conservatives are knuckle-dragging Neanderthals (which Neanderthal skeletons were found to be just Homo sapiens, but don't let that stop you from thinking of them as one of the missing links) because they don't drink our Kook-Aid of Lunacy!
Bitch, please! You moonbats are nothing but asstriches. (An asstrich is someone who instead of sticks his head in the sand sticks it in his own ass (which is a far worse and derogatory way of saying you're just believing in your own bullshit, much like people in insane asylums do).) Pull your fucking heads out of your own asses and meet the rest of us normal, sane people in something that we like to call Reality(TM), mmmkay? KTHX!
Movies aren't scientific!? (Score:3, Funny)
"Hey this is Unix. I know Unix"
With scientific banter like that, what purpose does the government have in getting involved?!
Re:glamorous (Score:3, Funny)
(well maybe you'd have an ACTUAL girlfriend, but thats not everything... is it?)
Does not one else sense an ulterior motive? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:glamorous (Score:5, Funny)
Re:not even close (Score:5, Funny)
You're right. And it would be so easy. The three-episode arc on tracking down an elusive double-free()d pointer practically writes itself.
I don't know... (Score:4, Funny)
Close Encounters of the Pedantic Kind (Score:5, Funny)
- Set a course for Alpha Centauri!
- Aye aye, Captain!
(five or more years of boring space cruise)
(exterior shots in perfect silence, there is no sound in space)
(finally the ship arrives)
- Scan for life forms!
- Sorry sir, there's no such thing as a "life form detector". It's not like life gives off a special energy or something.
- Well, shit. Let's go home then.
(several more years of boring space cruise)
Scientists vs. the Love Scene (Score:3, Funny)
"Hollywood (in general) does cheap ascientific things because it makes better movies than the real stuff."
Exactly. Plus can you imagine a scientist scripting the love scene?
"The mass of her heaving bosons betrayed her entanglement with Higgs, the mysterious agent she longed to know but had never seen."
Re:glamorous (Score:2, Funny)
Re:NUMB3RS (Score:3, Funny)
Oh wait you said math professor. nevermind. No way they can be as cool as Feynman: "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation"
Re:glamorous (Score:3, Funny)