Alzheimer's Progresses Faster in Educated People 226
Nrbelex writes "Bloomberg news is reporting that 'High levels of education speeds up the progression of Alzheimer's disease, according to a study published in next month's issue of the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. Mental agility dropped every year among Alzheimer's disease patients with each additional year of education, leading to an additional 0.3 percent deterioration, the researchers from the Columbia University Medical Center in New York found. The speed of thought processes and memory were particularly affected.'"
Have the statistics been properly done here? (Score:3, Interesting)
Additional 0.3% deterioration? (Score:5, Interesting)
"All the patients underwent around four neurological assessments, each of which comprised a dozen separate tests of brain function."
Given that Alzheimers affects everyone in different ways, I guess I'm just a little leery of a study that's claiming that it can quantitatively compare the mental facilities of one victim to another.
Reflection of Rote Memorization? (Score:5, Interesting)
For example, I can point to five people at my current job - each a very skilled software engineer, and each very skilled in debating other topics in current events; among those five people are 1 PhD, 2 Masters, 1 college drop-out, and 1 high school drop out. The one thing we all agree on? Much of traditional American education has become primarily a matter of rote memorization - there is very little teaching of theory and problem solving involved.
Further, I saw a different study some years ago that showed a strong correlation between studying the arts late in life and delaying the onset of Alzheimers. Proficiency in the arts tends to require lots of understanding of abstract concepts, akin to studying theory in more technical fields, and requires little rote memorization.
That is to say, is it possible that the study hit on people whose minds have become less plastic as a result of education? People whose brains have been conditioned to be crystalizable by massive repetition instead of adaptable to new situations? Or, to take the nature instead of nurture angle, was the study skewed heavy on people with more crystaline brains, because such people are more proficient in an educational environment heavy on rote memorization?
Play more GO! (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, if you trust in anectodal evidence:
http://users.eniinternet.com/bradleym/Mind.html [eniinternet.com] (Playing Go seems to "innoculate" one from Alzheimer's.)
So... I'm looking for ways to not just delay, but AVOID such a debilitating disease.
My body can fail me, and I'll accept it.
If my mind goes, someone shoot me please.
Re:Have the statistics been properly done here? (Score:5, Interesting)
I guess there was more truth there than the authors realized.
Dementia (Score:2, Interesting)
Yeah, seriously, people, it's not just "knowledge going away" - though there is that. It's a grown man barricading a door at night, thinking his 6-year old niece might be a serious threat to him. It's these weird bipolar shifts in attitudes and perceptions. Somebody can be their best friend one day, and an unscrupulous traitor the next.
I think I could deal with my dad becoming forgetful, losing capability to work with computers and electronics, and so on - though that's sad, too, since he taught me a lot of that stuff when I was a kid - but knowing where these other issues are headed just sucks.
Misleading (Score:2, Interesting)
It's not that the disease progresses quicker, it is only after diagnosis it progresses quicker. This probably means that on average the disease starts at the same time but that it manifests itself earlier in 'uneducated' people.
A theory is that educated people can 'route' around the disease better, so don't display external symptoms. Their education leads, on average, to them having more connections in their brain. However, a critical point is reached where the brain can't route around the problem, and symtoms begin to be detected.
To me this is a good thing, with a disease like this I'd prefer to go quickly rather than hang around.
Re:Have the statistics been properly done here? (Score:5, Interesting)
The researchers said one possible explanation is what has been dubbed the "cognitive reserve" theory.
This holds that highly educated people either have a greater number of nerve connections in their brains, or the nerve connections that they have are more efficient.
Therefore, when the damaging changes associated with Alzheimer's - such as the deposition of toxic protein clumps - start to take place, educated people are better placed to resist their effect at first.
However, the subsequent impact is likely to be greater than it would be in less educated brains, because of the higher levels of accumulated damage.
In other words (I think), educated people simply don't show the effects of Alzheimers as fast. By the time anybody notices that anything is wrong, a great deal of damage already exists. So since it is already at a later stage when you first notice it, it looks from the outside as though the person has very quickly reached an advanced stage of Alzheimers. Instead, they have been resisting Alzheimers for ages.
There was a New Scientist article about this...
The study itself (Score:2, Interesting)
N Scarmeas, S M Albert, J J Manly and Y Stern
Full text [bmjjournals.com] Abstract [bmjjournals.com] pdf [bmjjournals.com]
As others have pointed out, the study looked at rates of decline relative to initial performace, as opposed to examining the performance of individuals after 5 years of AD.