A Detailed Profile of the Hadron Super Collider 191
davco9200 writes "The New York Times has up a lengthy profile of the Large Hadron Collider. The article covers the basics (size = 17 miles, cost = 8 billion, energy consumption = 14 trillon electron volts) and history but also provides interesting interviews of the scientists who work with the facility every day. The piece also goes into some detail on the expected experiments. 'The physicists, wearing hardhats, kneepads and safety harnesses, are scrambling like Spiderman over this assembly, appropriately named Atlas, ducking under waterfalls of cables and tubes and crawling into hidden room-size cavities stuffed with electronics. They are getting ready to see the universe born again.' There are photos, video and a nifty interactive graphic."
The Problem with Something this Expensive (Score:3, Interesting)
"Energy Consumption" - WTF? (Score:5, Interesting)
17 miles. (Score:2, Interesting)
Perhaps it is just the structural engineer side of me, but i would love to know more about how they made something that large.
We don't need no stinkin' Higgs (Score:4, Interesting)
U(1) is a unit circle in the complex plane. SU(2) is a unit quaternion which is easy to animate if you have software for the job (barf out thousands of exp(q-q*), sort by time, drive through POVRay). Electroweak is the product of the first two. The animation of SU(3) tells you what the standard model is about, namely the ability to smoothly describe any event seen by an observer at 0,0,0,0. Gravity is about the sizes of things, so scale the ball to different sizes in a smooth way, and that is the symmetry behind gravity.
It is inertial mass that breaks the symmetry of standard model, not some phony Mexican hat dance around a false god of a vacuum.
doug
Power consumption = 14 Tev... ORLY? (Score:2, Interesting)
There's a youtube of their IT manager (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:"Energy Consumption" - WTF? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The Problem with Something this Expensive (Score:3, Interesting)
To plunge into the unknown is a moral imperative for any thinking being.
If all you care about are material practicalities, this thing is roughly 1/50th the current cost of a certain misadventure in the Middle East, and is more likely to produce cool stuff. One particularly exciting bit of technology already is the LHC's grid computing infrastructure [web.cern.ch].