Radiohead May Have Made $6-$10 Million on Name-Your Cost Album 539
mytrip passed us a link to a Wired article indcating that if music industry estimates are correct Radiohead has made as much as $10 million on the 'In Rainbows' album so far. This despite the estimates of widespread piracy of the album as well. "[The estimate assumes] that approximately 1.2 million people downloaded the album from the site, and that the average price paid per album was $8 (we heard that number too, but also heard that a later, more accurate average was $5, which would result in $6 million in revenue instead).
Finally! (Score:4, Insightful)
One thing's for sure: (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Finally! (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm impressed. (Score:5, Insightful)
Destroys both of the arguments the labels make in their own defense. Other artists would be fools not to learn from Radiohead.
Re:wtf (Score:5, Insightful)
good, but.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It's not piracy, idiots (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It's not piracy, idiots (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Cue Mozart's Requiem for the RIAA (Score:5, Insightful)
Radiohead is only able to cause this much of a stir and make this much money because everyone and his brother heard "Creep" on the radio umpteen times in the late 90's. Otherwise nobody would know who the hell Radiohead is and their name-your-price album would sell no better than the thousands of other bands charging $5 for a CD that hardly anybody has ever heard of.
And I don't think that's a bad thing. I think I'd like nothing more than the complete breakdown of the music industry so that you'd actually have to go out to bars to hear people play. I think with national exposure given to a select few by the media companies, great local and regional bands have a much tougher time finding an audience.
If it no longer paid to spend the millions promoting those few bands, they'd have to compete with the people who didn't win the record contract lottery, and we'd all be better off.
Re:Finally! (Score:4, Insightful)
With a label, if a musician has some decent pull, they might get $2 on a $20 album.
Without a label, a musician gets $2 on a $2 album.
The consumer/fan saves $18. The musician still makes just as much money. And potentially a lot more, since more people would be likely to pay $2 for an album than $20.
Re:So what's the control? (Score:3, Insightful)
Definition of Work (Score:4, Insightful)
I like the concept and I am glad Raidiohead tried this.
After looking at the royalty rates for software authors, musical artists, and other creative arts (movie,video,etc)...
The big companies / middle men are raking it in.
And the consumer is paying the bill.
The internet is leveling the playing field.
Lower cost of product, fewer hurdles to distribution, censorship by the consumer's choices (purchase y/n), variable/negoiatable pricing.
More money in being an artist.
Lower cost to consumer.
More artists can make a living being creative. (but possibly fewer mega-rich ones)
Fewer creative limits for the artist.
And the parasitic middle men can change careers.
Middle men that actually add value to the process will still exist. (but make a much more modest income)
The artist win ! The consumers win !
Re:It's not piracy, idiots (Score:1, Insightful)
Its still not PIRACY (Score:2, Insightful)
Just because some media outlet misused this word to refer to copyright infringement doesn't mean we should buy in. We are geeks, we should know better. Please stop reinforcing inappropriate connotations for this activity.
Great! Yes, make even more money!! (Score:5, Insightful)
While I despise greed, it might just be a very powerful force in the downfall of the labels and therefore the RIAA. Just imagine all those musicians just NOT renewing their contracts (or even trying to end their current ones) and go onto forming their own label and sell their music directly to their fans!
Re:Who the fuck is radiohead? (Score:4, Insightful)
Firefox gets changed from version to version.
The only exception is if someone accidentally deleted it; Which I imagine would be very few people, if any.
Althoguh I am not a fan, Radiohead is very popular...at least here in the northwest.
Re:Who the fuck is radiohead? (Score:5, Insightful)
There is also the added purchase support from those who may not be big Radiohead fans who would normally buy a record from them, but who are purchasing the album in order to support their decision to embrace the web... and not something to outlaw like certain parties would appearently like to see happen.....
Re:wtf (Score:4, Insightful)
"I'm sorry, but, if it's FREE, then it's not really PIRACY."
Popular understanding of the term "copyright" is that it refers to one's exclusive "right" to how something is "copied" (hence "copyright"). Does your understanding differ?
Putting on my Nostradamus hat for a second (although I will not write this as a quatrain), my guess is that we'll see your argument a lot more in the future. Many pirates claim that they have a moral allowance to pirate music because it's outrageously priced at a buck a track, and claim (disingenuously, of course) that they'll start buying when the price hits ($_CURRENTPRICE - $_ARBITRARYVALUE). When that day comes, I suppose the argument will be "Well, now it's practically free, so if I just help myself to the torrent, it's not really piracy now, is it?"
Re:I'm impressed. (Score:5, Insightful)
In the process, we would have gotten our music in front of more people and generated goodwill in the fan base. So there's a better growth potential, as buyers become, in a way, backers.
Too simple. (Score:3, Insightful)
It's cut out the "intermediaries" (well, aside from the payment processing people, hosting company, bandwidth providers, et. al.), but it isn't as if they're splitting $6m between themselves.
Re:Finally! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Who the fuck is radiohead? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Its still not PIRACY (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:One thing's for sure: (Score:5, Insightful)
In the short term though, it's probably going to be more like "w00t, free shit lolz!!!" than the above.
Re:I'm impressed. (Score:3, Insightful)
It's extremely hard to imagine that a small band (let alone an unknown) could have got anywhere near the amount of publicity this has had. Even if another band as big as Radiohead released an album in the same way, it wouldn't get as much publicity as this one has (being the first major release done in this way).
Re:Finally! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:"piracy" (Re:wtf) (Score:3, Insightful)
Piracy has been used to describe copyright infringement since the 19th century.
Re:Finally! (Score:3, Insightful)
Even without a label, the artist isn't out there doing these things without help. Someone is getting paid to do the distribution, but the splits are much better if it's not a (typical) label.
Re:and that is the threat to the big labels; (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:and that is the threat to the big labels; (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:and that is the threat to the big labels; (Score:4, Insightful)
They'll have a professional organization, but no lobbyists and no power. They'll be more or less fungible--Home Managers, parallel to Road Managers. Some will even do both.
Unless time started spinning backwards that won't happen. There's always consolidation and incorporation of any business that lasts more than 5-10 years in the industry.
You're right: labels will lose a LOT of their power, similar to how movie studios lost their business with exclusive contracts with actors in the 70-80 period. Also some of the big labels will go away, and some will adapt to the new business model.
Where you're wrong is that those alternatives won't grow and become big companies and have their own lobbies.
The same will happen with the publishers that will replace TV channels like MTV. Look at one emerging publisher: YouTube. Is it some tiny player with no power? No. Even before Google bought them, they had influence since they had a big community going on. And with big community, comes Google, or Microsoft, or Yahoo, and buys them. Consolidation.
Clarification: consolidation is not necessarily bad.
Re:Figure for comparison? (Score:3, Insightful)
FUD through name calling (Score:3, Insightful)
Actual pirates still kill real people, still really steal real cargo.
Trying to sow FUD about file sharing through this etymological fallacy only proves the *AA's level of desperation, and your defense of their crimes against language only proves you're a tool. "piracy" applied to file sharing is the same as a godwin: it's making a mountain out of a molehill.
Re:Finally! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Finally! (Score:4, Insightful)
Perhaps not, but it'd be interesting to see...
Re:and that is the threat to the big labels; (Score:4, Insightful)
And if you don't have the knowhow or money to do the recording yourself, there are all kinds of small studios with perfectly decent engineers that charge less than $1,000 for a day. It's perfectly feasible to record an album for $5,000-$10,000 this way, or much less if you have connections or friends in the small-time recording industry.
After that, electronic distribution is essentially free, via MySpace, or by setting yourself up on iTunes, eMusic, etc. If you also need CDs, a company like Kunaki can produce them for you on the fly for less than $2 each, *and* handle the ordering back end.
Compared to a lot of other things you could do for a living, music is *not* an expensive industry to be a part of, if you don't buy into the rock 'n' roll life style, often lived by artists who are *fearsomely* in hock to their major label for some ungodly advance money that it will take royalties years to pay off, if ever.
Re:Who the fuck is radiohead? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Figure for comparison? (Score:3, Insightful)
Accounting 101 (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:for the record (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'm impressed. (Score:4, Insightful)
Gee I guess you've never head about Chris Crocker and his "Leave Britney Alone" video have you? I'm in the fucking Costa Rican jungle and I've heard of him. I assure you, if a decent band posts some decent music, the fame will come. No RIAA required.
Re:Not as Altruistic as First Appears (Score:2, Insightful)
This way the people who would have pirated it still pirate it, but maybe they see a dollar or two out of people who would pirate it rather than pay full price for the CD. And they get every penny of the decreased price. It was sound business not altruism. Meanwhile they'll do a CD release later for people who actually want a shiny silver disk.
it's not all clear profit (Score:3, Insightful)
It must still be said though, even with the costs involved in making the album, that's a nice wad of cash.
Tp.
Re:Cue Mozart's Requiem for the RIAA (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:and that is the threat to the big labels; (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Finally! (Score:3, Insightful)
Any major change (in any endeavour) should be like this, unless stifling and routine is preferred.
So like... they are not selling it anymore? (Score:2, Insightful)
Nobody else will get the album this way?
Whats done is done?
We have the final count now and no more albums will be sold? Ever!?
So that is the new halflife for the music these days - 10 days?
After that, go find a new favorite song/album/band?
Shit... I'm getting old.
Re:Finally! (Score:3, Insightful)
That isn't to say that the idea doesn't work. It is just that you can't test it like this and claim to be scientific.
Re:Cue Mozart's Requiem for the RIAA (Score:2, Insightful)
Radiohead are one of the greatest bands ever. They revolutionized rock music throughout these last 15 years in ways I can only compare to The Beatles and still you only remember them for a song they released in 1992.
I'm sorry but if I had mod points I could only mod you either funny or troll.
Re:Who the fuck is radiohead? (Score:2, Insightful)
As of 1997, only 50% of the worlds population had actually made a phone call. The fact that the minority of the world uses the internet is representative of the fact that the minority can afford and have access to it.
It's easy for us cruisy first world types to forget this.
Tired of hearing geeks talk about the music biz... (Score:2, Insightful)