College Funding Bill Passes House, P2P Provision Intact 222
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Ars Technica is reporting that the College Opportunity and Affordability Act passed through the House today with a vote of 354-58 and the anti-P2P provision is intact. That provision would require universities to filter P2P and to offer legal alternatives. They are claiming now, though, that universities would not lose federal funding if they fail to do this. Of course, an amendment that would have clarified that was withdrawn immediately after it was offered."
bad summary (Score:5, Informative)
http://edlabor.house.gov/bills/HEAReauthorizationText.pdf [house.gov]
The relevant section: which is a patch to this [cornell.edu].
Looks like it simply means that the institution must disclose the policies etc. So they could simply say "we're doing nothing" and comply with the law.
Here is some Clarification (Score:5, Informative)
FTB:
See how your representative voted. [house.gov]
Even so... IMHO this still opens the door to more Orwellian legislation, and provides further evidence of how industry pwnes our government.
Err, you may not remember the prior story... (Score:3, Informative)
You see, I don't believe in imaginary property.
Re:What's needed for this madness to stop (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Free speech considerations.... (Score:5, Informative)
Not this SCOTUS. Bush loaded that quite well with pro-business judges. Young ones, too, so they'll be a probem for a half century or even more. Do not look for relief from the Imaginary Property crowd from those five. Reference Lawrence Lessig's noble attempt to void the 100+ year copyright by pointing out it was effectively eternal and thus violating the Constitution's design to release works into the public domain. The court's majority - not just Bushies, either -- stated that since the 100 years was a finite time period, the lockup was not technically eternal thus not violating the concept of release to the public domain. The sane counter that in 100 years time our descendants would not even understand what public domain was anymore, or that the future law would simply add another 100+ years, was lost on their ears. They are pro-business and pro-Imaginary Property.
Re:What REALLY concerns me... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Stupid laws (Score:3, Informative)
As bandwidth in/output rises, CPU time to investigate packets rises rather fast. It's easy with 1 or 10 hosts, but you start playing with N students where N = 50000... And as long as the source and destination know who is who, packets can then be munged heavily to hide the source, along with other TCP/IP tricks.
---2) the bandwidth
That's the reason for encryption. Plausible deniability.
3) put you behind nat
And as SKYPE and others have shown, NAT only makes a problem a bit harder, not impossible. I'm right now behind a NAT using bittorrent. I'm still getting 200 KBps down and 75KBps up (max for this connection is 310KBps down/125KBps up).
---Furthermore
As for data inspection, the data would be encrypted within a standard HTML page, with configurable tags to simulate real websites. It would not be hard to have a handshaking that agrees upon say, 10 unique websites and use that schematic for the session (there's plenty of techniques one could agree to share hidden data, I'm just stating a basic one). Really, how much bandwidth would the overhead take to hide what you're doing, along with encryption?
Do you actually think that the tags would be static? Hardly... rotate them as if they were real websites: polymorphic data encoding. Yum
Obama said today in Seattle he won't do that (Score:2, Informative)
So I wouldn't worry about the privacy restrictions being in effect for very long.
Think someone may have YouTubed it - I was there for three hours and just got back.
Re:GOOD (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Not really a win. (Score:2, Informative)
Have you read the FAQ on archive.org's hardware setup [archive.org]? Their goal, just for a start, is "one system administrator per petabyte". That amount of storage is not trivial, and suggesting one copy per university is a little overzealous. The Archive has three petabytes online; that's thirty racks the way they do it.