Obituary For the Sony Trinitron 297
An anonymous reader sends us to Gizmodo where, to honor the passing from production of the Sony Trinitron, they've done a timeline on the development of television. "After 280 millions tubes sold, Trinitron will be officially dead this month. Few Sony inventions have had the same gravitational pull as their Trinitron display technology... Trinitron became synonym of the best quality TV sets and computer monitors in the planet... Sony became the king of TV, with more than 100 million sets sold by 1994, to later fall under the weight of plasma and LCD technologies."
Memories (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Memories (Score:5, Informative)
The same cannot be said about their computers which are deliberately designed to fail soon after the warranty has expired. I had to deal with a batch of Vaios my old company bought before I joined and all of them developed spurious keyboard problems over the years. Guess why - the keyboard was located right on top of a huge permanently hot heatsink. Once I disassembled the first one it became obvious that the kbd membrane within 2 years was grilled into a crisp.
Re:All those years and we're still sentimental foo (Score:5, Informative)
Re:All those years and we're still sentimental foo (Score:5, Informative)
You're right, these are "features", and if you had got a trinitron screen without them, I would have been very surprised.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinitron#Visible_Support_Wires [wikipedia.org]
Respect (Score:2, Informative)
I remember the day when I got my first Nokia monitor with Trinitron technology.... The screen was heavy and took a lot of space, but hell, the quality of the image was just incredible for that time... My games never looked so good.... Gotta love Sony.
Rip...
Those two lines vs eye strain (Score:5, Informative)
My 19" was the last Sony product I ever purchased, their LCD screens just seem expensive and not much better than the competition. I guess they do not manufacture their own panels.
Re:Memories (Score:2, Informative)
Assuming a whopping 8h per day viewed: 100000h / 8h per day = 12500 days / 365.25 days per year = 34.2 years.
For a 25 year old TV? I doubt your statement.
Triniton monitors sucked (Score:5, Informative)
I've accidentally ruined the experience for at least a few new Triniton owners who had not previously noticed the lines. When someone points them out to you, it's apparently quite hard to ignore them again. For me, the lines were always just too much of an annoyance.
(*)For anyone interesting in knowing *why* there are these fine lines across a Triniton display, but not on most other conventional CRTs... go read up on aperture grille vs shadow mask. I was going to whore myself for some informative karma, but the Wikipedia article with images shows it better than I can tell it, so go read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture_grille [wikipedia.org]
The fine lines are shadows cast by "tension wires", necessary to stabilize the hundreds of vertical wires that make up the aperture grille. Shadow mask CRTs don't require these tension wires because they don't have the vertical wires (or strips). Instead, basically a bunch of holes are made in a sheet. This results in:
- More stable display (sheet with holes in it versus wires or thin strips).
- Slightly more accurate geometry (greater symmetry)
- Less overall brightness (the sheet with holes blocks more of the electron beam, resulting in a "duller" image).
- No shadows from tensioning wires
The last point is, of course, the kicker... and the reason why Trinitons make for awesome TVs. In a computer monitor, however, the brightness isn't needed and the drawbacks of Triniton technology outweigh the benefits, IMNSHO anyway.
In a Triniton TV, the tension wires are basically impossible to spot from a normal viewing distance. On a large Triniton computer monitor with high resolution and a good graphics card (good DAC), the wires are basically impossible NOT to see.
Re:impromptu ask /. (Score:2, Informative)
I would think that if you didn't have this then the answer would be no.
Still in use for Pro Video (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Serendipity (Score:3, Informative)
And they made some interesting clicks and pops too when you changed resolution, sometimes to the extent that you wondered if you were about to be showered in exploding glass.
Typo (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Triniton monitors sucked (Score:3, Informative)
Because they rock! I am a graphic designer and photographer.
My last CRT was an IBM P78 I think, using the Trinitron tube.
Here's why I loved it:
Like others, I caved in and got a fancy LCD (I brought my laptop to the store and asked the sale person to test the monitors until I found one that I liked).
LCDs suck at contrast. It's difficult to get nice black; many can't distinguish between very light shades or very dark shades; the color varies with viewing angle (not as bad as in the past, but it still happens); color reproduction is poor to fair (cheap LCDs tend to have blue-ish colors to appear brighter). I could go on...
If it weren't for the size and power consumption, I'd still be using my Trinitron CRT...
Re:Memories (Score:5, Informative)
Trinitron is dying because CRTs are dying, and Trinitron is the brand of a patented CRT tube design. Sony's new "quality" brand is Bravia.
Best image quality for price (Score:2, Informative)
Nowadays to get an equivalent LCD I'd probably need to sink my money into a +$1000 NEC professional LCD panel which is still weak on the response speed. (With LCDs usually fast panels mean poor colour and vice versa). I still haven't made the switch yet because I'm not too thrilled about paying more for less in some senses. And while an LCD may use less energy, I'm not so certain that the actual switch is good for the environment either. I remember reading a few years back that if you don't need to upgrade then don't because the environmental damage to build the new equipment is pretty extensive. (Not to mention disposal).
As a side note my dad got a 32 inch FlatTube Wega Trinitron TV for $350 on sale a month ago. For that price you can't even get an equivalent Plasma or LCD. It weighted a tonne to get it home but wow, is the image quality unbelievable. I'm personally sad to see this technology go. I still think LCDs or Plasmas are a compromise. Until OLEDs or even the patent burdened SED if ever becomes mainstream, I think we'll loose out on image quality.
Re:Triniton monitors sucked (Score:3, Informative)
Re:All those years and we're still sentimental foo (Score:3, Informative)
The heating caused by the electron beams hitting the aperture grille would cause the grill wires to expand slightly. If they weren't mechanically fastened together, the grille would warp out of shape enough to cause problems with convergence and purity.
Re:Obituary for the 2 horizontal lines (Score:5, Informative)
We bought an HD CRT tv a few years ago. 34" widescreen weighing in at 200 lbs. We're always tempted to get a wallmountable plasma or LCD, but we do watch some standard-def TV every once in awhile, and you're right, standard def TV is pretty much unwatchable on the panels (IMHO). And the CRT we have gives a better picture than the plasmas and LCDs...black is, well, black, no "effects". HD is wonderful and standard def is watchable.
But if you want to buy it from me, you'll need to hire your own crane.
Re:I want tougher LCD's (Score:2, Informative)