Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Government Politics

US CTO Choice Down To a Two-Horse Race 284

theodp writes "Barack Obama apparently didn't return CmdrTaco's call. BusinessWeek reports that the choices for the first US CTO have narrowed, and it's now a two-horse race between Padmasree Warrior, Cisco's CTO, and Vivek Kundra, who holds the same title for the Government of the District of Columbia. Two very different resumes — which would you advise Obama to pick?" I just know I was #3 on the list.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US CTO Choice Down To a Two-Horse Race

Comments Filter:
  • by Dan667 ( 564390 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:15PM (#26517359)
    seriously? I worked at Motorola when Padmasree was there and I have seen more tech success in that period watching my lawn grow.
  • Vivek (Score:5, Informative)

    by duffbeer703 ( 177751 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:16PM (#26517379)

    Is a big advocate of Google -- he transitioned the entire city government to Google Apps.

  • by stoolpigeon ( 454276 ) * <bittercode@gmail> on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:19PM (#26517415) Homepage Journal

    the dude from cisco is a woman.

  • by Martin Blank ( 154261 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:24PM (#26517467) Homepage Journal

    Padmasree Warrior is a woman.

    Still, I don't trust most people from Cisco any further than I can throw a 6509. A few exceptions aside, their best people seem to leave to form other, more interesting (and ethical) companies. I know that sales people in general are not to be trusted, but Cisco reps seem to have carved their own special niche on that point.

  • Re:Cisco Guvmint (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:26PM (#26517501)

    On the basis that Cisco functions and makes money, while DC is a disaster, Cisco_guy++.

    Have you ever worked with Cisco? I have and it was a nightmare. They are a horribly inefficient bureaucracy that makes money by leveraging their existing client base and giving purchasers all the hookers and blow they need to get them to sign. They owned 10% of a company I worked for, then decided to buy one of our failed competitors and try to compete against us. Said competitor failed for a reason, so when that flopped they tried to strong arm us into canceling our product in that market. When that failed they spent millions more to buy two more firms we had driven out of business because their products were so much worse than ours.

    Their main problem is that they can make okay hardware, but they suck at software and they really, really, really suck at user interfaces and integration of products. Their corporate ethics are in the toilet with their standing layoffs policy and they're more than happy to push crappy solutions on all their "partners" and big customers while forgetting to mention that they won't touch the same solution with a ten foot pole for use on their own network.

    So yeah they're terrible, which is still probably not as bad as Washington DC.

  • by CE@UIC ( 14343 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:46PM (#26517795)

    I'll second that. I also worked for Moto during that time also and the only impressive thing that came out of the office of the CTO was the lack of innovation coming out of the office.
    The CTO of the country doesn't need to be someone with an impressive resume who's never actually done anything or created anything substantial, it needs to be someone who has actual experience innovating and growing innovation.

  • by KeithJM ( 1024071 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:47PM (#26517817) Homepage

    Well, Cisco sucks. And the government of D.C. sucks.

    Right, the government sucks, so by no means should you consider working for the government

    I won't defend the guy's attitude, but if you RTFS (S = summary), one of the candidates worked for the Government of DC. So he wasn't saying "All governments suck so I wouldn't work for one," he was saying "the DC government sucks so I wouldn't promote one of their C?Os."

  • by filthpickle ( 1199927 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @01:54PM (#26517899)
    I think the phrase "close enough for government work" predates Ronnie "50 megatons hurts bad" Raygun. Which suggests to me that he didn't inspire the feeling.

    an interesting aside to this aside...I googled that phrase to see when it first started to be used. There seems to be some sentiment that it used to mean 'work of the highest quality' but got changed to mean shoddy work somewhere along the way. Either way, it's had the negative connotation since at least the '60's.
  • Re:I vote other (Score:2, Informative)

    by megamerican ( 1073936 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @02:05PM (#26518051)

    Secretary of Defense Robert Gates who helped create Al-Qaeda while under Zbigniew Brzezinski [wikipedia.org] in Carter's Administration. He was very much involved in the Iran-Contra [wikipedia.org] affair. This was enough to stop him from being DCI in 1991, but now it's perfectly fine.

    Attorney General Eric holder wrote a brief to the SCOTUS on the DC gun ban and said that there is no individual right to own gun. He was apart of the Clinton Administrations Justice Department when Clinton pardoned [go.com] all of his cocaine trafficking [usdoj.gov] buddies.

    Rahm Emanuel is crazy [rollingstone.com], a duel citizen of Israel and the U.S. and while in charge of who to give money to in the 2006 election cycle decided to acitvely shun anti-war candidates.

    That's just a start.

  • by FireStormZ ( 1315639 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @02:10PM (#26518103)

    "Blame Ronnie Raygun"

    Oh lol, how original...

    "He popularized the idea that "government is the problem"

    Actually that idea was popularized by the founding fathers who knew that Government sucked so bad that it needed a leash (B.O.R) and that the 10th was needed to keep the federal government in its place. Having lived in two very Different states (NY and Minnesota) I can tell you tat some government suck less (Minnesota) than others (NY) but given the fact the states are to be laboratories of democracy the federal government almost always sucks.

    "militarization, possibly in hopes of bankrupting the federal government."

    Horse manure, link or not its still horse manure. RR was trying to bankrupt the Soviet government not the US government something he successfully did.

  • by Roxton ( 73137 ) <roxton@g[ ]l.com ['mai' in gap]> on Monday January 19, 2009 @02:21PM (#26518217) Homepage Journal

    "He popularized the idea that "government is the problem"

    Actually that idea was popularized by the founding fathers who knew that Government sucked so bad that it needed a leash

    Uh-huh. You do realize that one of the first actions of our founding fathers was to buy up state debt to establish national credit, right?

  • by Colin Smith ( 2679 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @02:28PM (#26518307)

    It took a Bush to bankrupt the USA[1].

    [1] In fact, the USA declared bankruptcy on 15th August 1971, and it was Nixon wot did it.
     

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 19, 2009 @02:36PM (#26518379)

    Mod parent up. Never understood this particular American obsession with tearing down the government and then proudly claiming it sucks. Sounds insane to me.

    It's a tradition that dates back to 1776.

  • by FireStormZ ( 1315639 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @02:46PM (#26518491)

    Its a cultural problem. California (dems) has been going bankrupt for years, so has NY (dems and rinos), and a fed run mostly by the GOP... The fact is *both* parties are so busy buying our votes that there is no hope of getting out of debt..

  • by FireStormZ ( 1315639 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @03:33PM (#26519049)

    "That's true, the founding fathers fought a revolution against bad governments and once they ousted the British they invented the monarchy and named George Washington the ruler of the land and all our presidents since then have been his descendants."

    Actually they revolted against a powerful government which was active in peoples every day lives and created a weak one which should seldom be seen..

    "Also true, the soviets were doing so well under communism it seemed no one could stop them. Only the keen intellect of Ronald Reagan was able to find a way to undermine that fundamentally sound Marxist economy."

    In the late 70's people believed the US would be crushed and the Soviets were not doing as badly as one might think. They did have a huge amount of oil and natural gas, the attitude among many were that they were a healthier economy than us..

    "The founding fathers fought against unchecked hereditary power and created the government you hate so much. Communism defeated itself. Take some of those trickle down dollars and buy a clue."

    Unchecked... Umm House of commons/lords means anything to you? The monarchy in England was under check for nearly a half millennium before the revolution.

    The founders fought against a lack of representation *not* against hereditary rule. Many, *MANY*, people wanted George Washing to be a king in a constitutional monarchy not much different than the English monarchy and anyone who has studied Franklin knows that until he was humiliated in England by his enemies he was quite content to stay a part of great Brittan on the condition of representation and equality with English citizens.

    Before you chastise others by telling them to 'buy a clue' maybe you should read a book..

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 19, 2009 @03:43PM (#26519163)
    the Clinton surplus only existed due to the .com bubble. The current economic crisis is due partly to the federal reserve's attempts to soften that bubble implosion. There is no path to a debt free America that doesn't involve significant spending cuts, something congress won't do.
  • by LynnwoodRooster ( 966895 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @04:19PM (#26519603) Journal
    And then that pesky little thing called 9/11 happened before the first Bush budget. And of course, the budget deficits under the GOP and Bush were dropping from the Clinton recession and 9/11 fiasco; it was when the Democrats took over in 2006 and created the last two budgets that we saw the deficits spike.
  • by gabroo ( 635458 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @04:36PM (#26519833)

    Most posts here seem to be generalizations based on little to no facts, and I can't see how that's helping the discussion.

    Can't speak for the Cisco lady, but Kundra has been kicking serious butt in DC. He's run tech start-ups and runs his agency the same way: aggressive, frugal, and with little tolerance for those that don't performance. Here's a Washington Post article on him from a few weeks ago: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/04/AR2009010401235.html [washingtonpost.com]

    He created hundreds of data feeds in his first few months in office to make DC one of the most open governments around. Then a few months ago, he hosted an open competition with $20k of prizes for anyone to create innovative applications using these data feeds.

  • by Blakey Rat ( 99501 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @04:45PM (#26519951)

    Cripes. I never said "the government sucks."

    At best, I said "the government of D.C. sucks". Is this like No Reading Comprehension Day on Slashdot? Do people not realize that the city of Washington D.C. has a government which is distinct from that of the Federal Government? WTF.

    Some idiot puts words into my mouth and suddenly I'm Anti-Citizen Number 1.

  • by aestas ( 1456651 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @04:52PM (#26520041)
    I totally agree. As a citizen of DC, I can attest to how Vivek has revolutionized the city. Anything that needs to be done from a simple change of address to locating the closest snow plow can be found online. The new WMATA website allows me to get real time trane information to ensure there is no waiting on the platforms - and even better this can all be done from my iPhone - drive by Vivek's "Apps for Democracy" contest.
  • Re:Vivek (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 19, 2009 @06:53PM (#26521693)

    My vote is also for Vivek. After reading through his wikipedia page, he comes across as being a MUCH better candidate than the Padmasree Warrior, especially after considering the complete mess Moto is in right now under her leadership. Mr. Vivek pushed for open source initiatives in DC and in Colombia. As well as opening up business initiatives in India. There isnt too much info available on his wiki page, but I am impressed with the guy.

  • by The Cydonian ( 603441 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @08:19PM (#26522855) Homepage Journal
    A popular Malayali surname; it's often transliterated as 'Warrier' or 'Variar' as well. In fact, there was an Indian minister with the exact same surname, just transliterated differently in English.
  • Re:I vote other (Score:4, Informative)

    by quarterbuck ( 1268694 ) on Monday January 19, 2009 @08:55PM (#26523241)
    You are either exaggerating or are mistaken.
    USA (Brzezinski or whoever) did not create Al Qaeda. It is true that many Al Qaeda members fought Russia in Afghanistan and that the Afghan Mujahedeens were funded by USA through Pakistan -- But Al Qaeda is a much later group formed in Saudi Arabia (according to Bin Laden against US presence in Holy Land). Very different times, different places.
    Rahm Emanual Dual-Citizenship allegation is baseless [wikipedia.org] according to Wikipedia.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...