Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Portables Hardware

Norway Trying Out Laptops For High School Exams 120

The BBC reports that Norway is experimenting with a system that would let secondary school students take their school exams on laptop computers. According to the article, using computers for exams isn't new there, but it's been on fixed machines rather than personal computers that the students can take with them and use for other purposes throughout the school day. Having suffered through three years of exams taken on the awful SoftTest (inflexible, single-platform, ugly, buggy), I hope they do a better job — this is something that is all too easy to get wrong.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Norway Trying Out Laptops For High School Exams

Comments Filter:
  • Tweaks to the System (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Sunday May 03, 2009 @08:46PM (#27811041) Homepage

    Some things they might consider rather than key logging is booting from supplied portable media or booting from the network. Using key logging tends to set a bad precedent and the whole of school experience is part of their education, including accepted practices by government and respect for the privacy of individuals.

    So boot from network and a quick scan and check, or boot from a cdrom which contains all required software and the exams, it also initiates a system check and then uploads the results to the network. Really easy to do with free open source software but could prove expensive with closed source proprietary software ie licences on top of licences and even 'illegal' in some cases.

  • Um... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by gcnaddict ( 841664 ) on Sunday May 03, 2009 @09:34PM (#27811343)
    In Virginia, students in high schools can take the SOL (standards of learning) tests on laptops and see their score next day (only in order to prevent guessing the answers based on scores if scores were given immediately).

    Why is this something new?
  • Is it secure? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by antikristian ( 856519 ) on Sunday May 03, 2009 @09:51PM (#27811451)
    They use a software called MAS from a company called 3AMI (3AMI.com) I personally think it's a bad idea though to use propriatary software that doesn't even specify what level of security it practices between client and server. (oh nevermind, it requires a "password", it must be secure)

    Some documentation would be nice.

    The Norwegian Data Inspectorate (datatilsynet) is not to happy about their trials though.
  • by artor3 ( 1344997 ) on Sunday May 03, 2009 @09:57PM (#27811485)

    The college I went to had us do some exams on our personal laptops. They'd give you a CD to boot from, which put you into a separate OS with no way of accessing the contents of your harddrive or USB drives. You'd then connect to a server to get your particular test. I never heard of anyone finding a way to cheat - excluding the methods that work on pencil & paper tests, of course.

    I once tried stealing one of the disks and booting up from a lounge back in my dorm, with text books and a calculator at hand, but they were smart enough to block connections to the test server from outside the testing rooms.

    The system can definitely work, when properly implemented.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 03, 2009 @10:25PM (#27811693)

    "I've been through this school-system and I'm no big fan. What usually happens is that it almost impossible to fail an exam, and there is very hard to get a good mark. ( a celebration of mediocracy )"

    I beg to differ, regular non-open book exams don't test much of anything. They test how well you can binge and purge and not much else.

    The whole exam mindset is flawed IMHO, what students need is ways to integrate and practically apply what they are learning to what they are doing so they DO remember it not just as something taught out of a book, but the can actually go about using it when they want to do something.

  • by Narpak ( 961733 ) on Sunday May 03, 2009 @10:45PM (#27811821)
    While there are definitive flaws in implementation the general idea behind most courses in Norway is that the student shouldn't memorize a lot of trivia; but rather be able to use information productively regarding the subject. Showing a deeper understanding of the subject and the tools necessary to work within the field of study weights heavier than simply parroting of facts and figures.

    Of course this is far harder for a teacher to evaluate than a simple multiple choice exam (I never had a single multiple choice test during my twelve years of basic education and three years at university). Therefore any student with the capacity to write coherently on the subject of their studies will at the very least be able to get a passing grade. Of course actually excelling requires the student to not only write coherently but to show real capacity for reason, and being able to correctly use and present in a way that shows their firm grasp of the matter at hand. The problem at the moment, at least with some courses, is that a student can read through the material and then simply float through the system by not being an idiot; i.e. getting passing grades by simply showing up and not write stuff that is utterly garbage.

    I would agree that the implementation needs to motivate students to study harder and learn more, and to reward them when they do. Though there is a phrase that is the main doctrine for High School and above which is; Responsible for Your Own Education. Which means that students themselves are responsible for actively pursuing the knowledge required to improve in their field of study. Unfortunately statistics and psychology indicates that things aren't quite that simple. Especially when a student beginning high school is about sixteen and probably royally feed up with going to school as it is.
  • Re:Well... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by slimjim8094 ( 941042 ) on Sunday May 03, 2009 @10:46PM (#27811825)

    Huh. Must suck where you are. I was once asked to take my cellphone out and leave it in a bucket at the front of the class, but they didn't check beyond 'voluntary' compliance.

  • Why not? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by BigRics44 ( 1546803 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @12:13AM (#27812325)
    In my college I have had easy professors and hard professors. Old school professors and innovative professors. I had some classes where everything was only and classes that everything was on paper. I don't see why not have computers for testing. Testing has become this huge topic of discussion. We are really forgetting what testing is. It is a way to find out how much someone knows about a subject. Ok. Lets go from there. Having a test on a computer gives you access to a lot of information at your finger tip. So does open note tests, we all remember back in the day, the open note tests were the hardest. Ok so they have all this information at their hand so eventually they will be able to find the information they need to pass a test. Just like old times when it was all books you put a time on it and that is it. You wanna make sure that the person is the person that is supposed to be taking the test you put a digital finger impression at the door, the kid wants to go to the bathroom, no problem scan out and scan back in. Easy!!! So really the place where you write/type the answer changes but the test is still the same, this is too much talking and not enough action. We are in the 21st century. Yes! Kids should be using their laptops for exams.
  • by blueg3 ( 192743 ) on Monday May 04, 2009 @12:34AM (#27812447)

    Only because they're not engineered with subversion in mind. Bluepill is simply a hypervisor, and it's exceptionally difficult to tell if it's running.

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds

Working...