Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education The Almighty Buck News

Student Loan Interest Rankles College Grads 1259

theodp writes "Like many recent college grads, Steven Lee finds himself unemployed in one of the roughest job markets in decades and saddled with a big pile of debt — he owes about $84,000 in student loans for undergrad and grad school. But what's really got Lee angry are the high interest rates on his government-backed student loans. 'The rate for a 30-year mortgage is around 5%,' Lee said. 'Why should anyone have to pay 8.5%? The government has bailed out homeowners. It's bailed out big businesses. Why can't it also help students?' Not only that, federal student loans are the only loans in the nation that are largely non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, have no statutes of limitations, and can't be refinanced after consolidation, so Lee can forget about pulling a move out of the GM playbook. And unlike mortgages on million-dollar vacation homes, student loans have very limited tax deductability. A spokeswoman for the Department of Education blamed Congress for the rates which she conceded 'may seem high today,' but suggested that students are a credit-unworthy lot who should thank their lucky stars that rates aren't 12% or higher. Makes one long for the good-old-days of 3% student loans, doesn't it?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Student Loan Interest Rankles College Grads

Comments Filter:
  • by jkrise ( 535370 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @10:58PM (#29789151) Journal

    In India, student loans are 12% compound interest; while the borrowing rate in good banks is as high as 7.5% compunded quarterly.Money makes the world go round...

  • by bipbop ( 1144919 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:00PM (#29789161)
    I think you mean "deductibility", not "detectability", though I'll admit to not reading very closely.
  • by MBGMorden ( 803437 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:00PM (#29789163)

    Not sure where the mentions loans were from, but my loans have all been cheap too. My lowest interest rate was 4.5% and the highest was around 6%.

  • by cjfs ( 1253208 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:00PM (#29789167) Homepage Journal

    The rate for a 30-year mortgage is around 5%,' Lee said. 'Why should anyone have to pay 8.5%?

    Because if you default on the mortgage, they can take your house. Education repossession technology is still in beta. Even when it works it and rarely returns anything of value.

  • by metlin ( 258108 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:01PM (#29789169) Journal

    But in India, education is also highly subsidized and in a lot of universities, the fee structure is merit-based (i.e. your ranking in your entrance examinations determine which stratum you fall under).

  • Mine are very cheap (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:01PM (#29789173)

    I just consolidated my federal student loans, at 2.25%. I'm not sure where these people are getting the 8+% figures from.

  • Easily detected (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:01PM (#29789177)

    My student loans were detected in my taxes and actually increased my refund.

  • by binaryspiral ( 784263 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:02PM (#29789185)

    Pay your loan for 10 years... and the government will excuse the rest.

    Some restrictions apply...

    http://www.nextstudent.com/articles/student-loans-forgiven.asp [nextstudent.com]

  • by dov_0 ( 1438253 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:02PM (#29789187)
    All my student debts are in Australia. The system here is a one off 10% levy on student loans from the government then it gets taken out of your pay with your tax, after you reach a certain thresh-hold. Debts cease on death (a nice comforter if you've done a lot of study and don't want family saddled with debt.)
  • by societyofrobots ( 1396043 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:05PM (#29789221)

    Unlike most other loans, student loans can get you a large tax deduction come April.

  • by gbarules2999 ( 1440265 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:15PM (#29789309)
    Though to be honest I'm ranting more about tuition here than loans. My loans are actually pretty damn low; like in the 2-3% range. The ones outside of the feds go into 8%.
  • by Darkness404 ( 1287218 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:15PM (#29789313)
    Its becoming increasingly obvious that education is more or less worthless for the -vast- majority of occupations. While a top degree will perhaps land you a job, people are starting to wonder why. The CEOs with degrees at Harvard are running companies into the ground. While education is a "nice thing" perhaps its time to start, as a society rebelling against unneeded education, especially with the internet. 25 years ago to find a lot of stuff you would need to spend time researching things either at a public library or at a college library. Today that is no longer the case. Similarly, even though technology has expanded, the skills needed to do a job have not for most careers, if anything technology has automated many of the tedious, time consuming and error-prone tasks. Knowledge is free, education is not. Knowledge is needed at most jobs, education in all honesty is not. I think its time for society to realize this.
  • Re:Tough Shit. (Score:2, Informative)

    by gbarules2999 ( 1440265 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:17PM (#29789329)
    If you want financial aid or even some scholarships, you have no choice but to take whatever loan they offer you.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:17PM (#29789331)

    In Australia, an average degree costs about $20K to $30K (depending on arts vs science/law/engineering/etc) and there's no interest on the government loan. It is, however, indexed to inflation.

    If you go overseas, you don't have to keep paying it until you return to Australia, and it is terminated upon death. That maximum rate it is taken from you pay at is 7% and that only starts when you hit about $30K to $40K per year.

    This only applies to degrees taken at public universities, but most of the universities in Australia are public (certainly all the best ones are).

    So to hear about this system America uses is quite disturbing. The university attendance rate over there must be exceptionally low?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:19PM (#29789353)

    There are two general type of student loans: direct and non-direct with a dirt cheap and a cheap interest rate. 8.5% is cheap for an UNSECURED loan that doesn't START accumulating interest until AFTER you graduate (actually Govt pays interest till you graduate).

    Dude- you got $85K with ZERO collateral. The rate is NOT unreasonable. It is the best investment you can make for your future.

    You can always become a teacher in the inner city or work 2 years for Peace Corps or any of the other methods the government has setup for most or all of your loan to be FORGIVEN.

    Stop complaining about getting cheap money with no collateral and no limitation, except that you go to school.

  • Agreed (Score:3, Informative)

    by Beowulf_Boy ( 239340 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:20PM (#29789357)

    I'll be graduating next summer with a Masters in IT Management. (Undergrad in Simulation Design Engineering)
    75k or so in loans, and the year I went to college they jacked up the interest rate to 6.8%.

    And to everyone saying its unsecured debt needs to actually look into their facts. Student Loans can not be bankrupt on, if I don't pay, the gubmint will dock my pay. Which actually is a better deal that paying the loans, the max they can dock is 15% per check, and my loans will be way more than that to actually pay.

    The loans are government backed, they should be no interest.

  • by Penguinshit ( 591885 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:22PM (#29789371) Homepage Journal
    And when you default on the student loans your wages and other income gets garnished. That renders your point moot.
  • by Culture20 ( 968837 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:32PM (#29789469)

    'The rate for a 30-year mortgage is around 5%,' Lee said. 'Why should anyone have to pay 8.5%? The government has bailed out homeowners. It's bailed out big businesses. Why can't it also help students?'

    Angry? You just got a "free" education, dummy. Sure, you have to pay the money back, but you didn't have to work and go to school intermittently for 10+ years hoping that you can finish your first degree before your credits are too old to apply. Your 401k/403b/457b/whatever will also have a 5-6 year head start, which will be amazing. College students from every previous generation have had a reputation for being poor. The subject of this post is a joke from a while back. Same as "Can you spare a dime? Working my way through med school."

  • by Xcott Craver ( 615642 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:38PM (#29789535)

    Maybe it's because you're borrowing over 80,000 dollars for a college education.

    5 minutes with a spreadsheet would tell you how much and for how long you have just screwed yourself, and by borrowing that kind of money you prove that you can't or won't spend even that much effort to think before borrowing.

    I think part of the problem is cultural: I was broke back when I went to college, and I needed loans; but I also knew that you should never borrow anywhere near enough to pay your whole tuition bill. That's far too much money to borrow even if you aren't dead broke. Poverty forces you into indebtedness, but it also makes you paranoid about accumulated debt, and you understand that something that costs tens of thousands of dollars will require you to eat Ramen, work multiple jobs, and make affordable choices even if someone will extend you credit.

    But now I hear horror stories about students who borrow enough money to buy a house in much of the USA, and use that to pay for an entire four-year degree plus graduate school. It's like the kids don't understand that they're poor; they get a credit line and stop acting like people who have to work for a living.

  • by rnaiguy ( 1304181 ) on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:48PM (#29789633)
    Really? Grad school's been a pretty good deal for me as far as loans go. I just called up my lenders, and got all my student loans deferred (with no interest) until i complete my PhD. And considering that I get paid to do grad school, I plan to pay off those loans as soon as I graduate. I think the answer is to stop whining, save money, and if you couldn't afford the school in the first place, perhaps choose a cheaper option?
  • by anagama ( 611277 ) <obamaisaneocon@nothingchanged.org> on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:54PM (#29789683) Homepage
    I presumed it was 30k/year. 4*30=120>56
  • Re:Tough Shit. (Score:3, Informative)

    by booyabazooka ( 833351 ) <ch.martin@gmail.com> on Sunday October 18, 2009 @11:57PM (#29789711)

    Are the doctors and lawyers the ones who can't repay their student loans?

  • by edwebdev ( 1304531 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @12:01AM (#29789747)
    I think you must have loans that are somehow different from mine. While I don't have to make payments on most of my loans while I'm in grad school, the interest continues to accrue. I would also like to propose a distinction between "whining" and anecdotally highlighting a situation that is both unfair to individuals who decide to pursue an advanced education and harmful to the intellectual and scientific health of the country.
  • by anagama ( 611277 ) <obamaisaneocon@nothingchanged.org> on Monday October 19, 2009 @12:02AM (#29789759) Homepage
    No they don't. The max is $2500, and the deduction is income limited, i.e., over a certain threshold it is reduced with rising income until it hits zero.
  • by witherstaff ( 713820 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @12:28AM (#29789975) Homepage

    There's a vast difference between the skilled tradesman and what you call morons. Give me a licensed master plumber, master electrician, mechanical contractor, etc and I'll show you someone that truly understands their field and has years of experience under their belt. Sure the variety of assistants range in ability like any job, but to label the actual skilled person as a moron shows you don't understand the field. That'd be like comparing someone who flips burgers to a skilled chef. Also the skilled trades are very strongly union in every major city, unions being one of the strongest backers of the Democrats.

    As for continuing education much of the green movement is powered by installation of ultra high efficiency equipments. Pull up a wiring schematic for a 96% boiler and the various pumps and zone valves - it's anything but moronic work.

    So what's up with the trades bashing? Watch a few episodes of Dirty Jobs and you'll see some examples of problem solving at the finest.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 19, 2009 @12:37AM (#29790053)

    [ Disclaimer: I work for a non-profit company in the Student Loan business who has been around for 25+ years ]

    The reason loans rates were low had nothing to do with DIRECT loans. The FFEL (ie; non-DIRECT) program has exactly the same rates, and existed long before DIRECT was even a thought. These rates are determined by Congress, and are a supposedly based on the governments cost of getting loans from the private sector (T-Bills, etc...) DIRECT loans was an attempt to remove private enterprise from the student loan arena, and for the most part it has succeeded. Companies are no longer motivated to give benefits to students (interest rate reductions, forgiveness of debt, etc...). Any 'profits' made from student loans for a FFEL lender must be given back to the students and/or given back to the government. With DIRECT, this is no longer the case, since DIRECT *is* the government. Congress still will set the rates, and you'll still pay the same amount you always paid, and you'll get the same wonderful service you get from the IRS and other government agencies.

    As we all know, when government gets involved, effeciencies and such go through the roof. People's motivation to do a good job skyrockets, and for the most part everything will be well. (BTW, the former is sarcasm...)

    As others have stated, the problems is NOT about student loans, the problem is the cost of education. (Unfortunately, the cost of not getting an education is much worse.. 'Would you like fries with your burger?')

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 19, 2009 @12:54AM (#29790183)

    Your inflation in the long run (10+ years) is 8%. I think the US is 3%.

  • by smoker2 ( 750216 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @01:20AM (#29790379) Homepage Journal
    You can. Get a bank loan from somewhere else and pay off your student debt in full. Then it is not bound by the rules any more. Or have you promised to pay over a certain time span ?
  • by XDirtypunkX ( 1290358 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @01:47AM (#29790515)

    $20k to $30k sounds about right for a the average undergrad who isn't full fee paying. For most undergrad degrees where the students qualified through one of the standard mechanisms (and isn't an international student), the government still pays a good 2/3rds of the cost.

  • by XDirtypunkX ( 1290358 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @01:54AM (#29790555)

    Not to mention that the Australian system also pays students fortnightly payments if they're in a position to not be able to afford shelter and food while studying. Note that there is no long term obligation attached to that money (you don't have to pay it back).

  • Not all direct loans have subsidized interest. Most of my loans are of the unsubsidized type, and while not due while in school, accrued interest from the date of issue. Some of my loan money is subsidized, and is not accruing interest while in deferment.

    The first chunk of my loans, issued pre-Fall 2006, are at ~1.8% and is a variable rate. My loans issued Fall 2006 and onwards are at 6 and change. My only complaint is that they refuse to let me pay back the higher interest loan first, telling me that federal law prohibits it.
    Loans for graduate school are higher, my wife has graduate PLUS loans at the 8.5%.

    2 years in the Peace Corps will not forgive any of your loans, it will just get you a two year deferment. Those PLUS loans of the OP are going to sit and accrue interest at 8.5% for two years. The $6,000 "resettlement" cash PC gives you when you return won't cover the interest on his loans. Not withstanding any other benefits (increased employability, personal growth, ect), the PC is a poor economic decision for recent graduates with unsubsidized loans.

  • outrage noted :-) (Score:5, Informative)

    by r00t ( 33219 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @03:19AM (#29791013) Journal

    That just got modded "flamebait" by somebody who clearly resents being reminded that some degrees (his own most likely) have nearly zero economic value.

    It's an annoying way to stifle debate, but at least I find it amusing. :-/

  • by r00t ( 33219 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @04:14AM (#29791185) Journal

    According to http://www.springerlink.com/content/u380751518251x56/ [springerlink.com]

    "Majoring in a scientific or technological discipline, earning good grades, persisting to degree completion, getting and staying married, and not having dependent children are all actions that substantially increase the likelihood of repayment and lower the likelihood of default."

    You have to pay to get the full publication I guess, but that first part says what should be obvious: people with nerd degrees don't default.

  • by gnud ( 934243 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @06:20AM (#29791695)
    Here in Norway, you don't have to pay interest if you're unemployed, and can put off the downpayments on the loan itself.
  • by xtracto ( 837672 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @06:21AM (#29791701) Journal

    Free education? Excellent!

    I'm off to earn fifteen PhDs, now.

    What, actually get a job? No way, you're paying for my room and board. Forever.

    That's already solved. In Mexico public Universities are completely free (well, only about 50 US Dollars every 6 months). Now, how do you get your food and roof while you study is your own problem.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 19, 2009 @07:58AM (#29792263)

    To be accurate, Czech Republic is not Czechoslovakia either...
    Things are far from perfect here (is there some "perfect"?), but we've moved a lot since old "soviet satellite" era. It's not that different from Austria, for example (except you can go shopping when you want, not when the goverment decides you should) - this is EU we're talking about (and not even "romania-type EU", just in case).
    I consider general, public healthcare one of advantages compared to USA.

  • by bkr1_2k ( 237627 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @08:05AM (#29792315)

    It's the same way here in the US. People just don't want to mention that because it implies paperwork for them. All 5 minutes worth of paperwork.

  • Re:bad deal (Score:3, Informative)

    by DaHat ( 247651 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @08:27AM (#29792481)

    FYI: The 'forgiveness' only kicks in if you are working in certain 'public service' areas... an area I’d wager your average /.er does not... and again, only on federal loans (only ~2/5ths of my student loans are federal for example).

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 19, 2009 @08:48AM (#29792649)

    "Lennon/McCartney" (the songwriting duo)

    "Lenin/McCarthy" (politicians who gained power by exploiting Communism)

    I can see why you might confuse Lennon with McCartney or Lenin with McCarthy. So intertwingled. And you have to be an expert to know the difference between a John song and a Paul song since they always had joint attribution.

    Anyway, Wikipedia (which is never wrong) says the "useful idiot" quote is mis-attributed to Lenin (the Russian):

    The term is commonly attributed to Vladimir Lenin, sometimes in the form "useful idiots of the West", to describe those Western reporters and travelers who would endorse the Soviet Union and its policies in the West. However, no reference to a communist sympathizer or political leftist as a "useful idiot" was made in the USA until 1948, and not until decades later would the use of the phrase by Lenin be commented on in the west. In 1948, the phrase was used in a New York Times article in relation to Italian politics; it was mentioned again in 1961. Critics of the term assert that the expression "useful idiot" has never been discovered in any published document of Lenin's, nor that anyone has claimed to have heard him say it. In the spring of 1987, Grant Harris, senior reference librarian at the Library of Congress, said "We have not been able to identify this phrase [useful idiots of the West] among [Lenin's] published works."

  • by russotto ( 537200 ) on Monday October 19, 2009 @09:56AM (#29793445) Journal

    It's the same way here in the US. People just don't want to mention that because it implies paperwork for them. All 5 minutes worth of paperwork.

    You can get forebearance on student loans, but interest still accumulates.

    Best I can see, since student loans aren't dischargable in bankruptcy, if you're largely without assets and without sufficient employment, the sensible thing is just plain default on them and take the hit on your credit record. If you try to pay them and end up behind on your rent as a result, you'll find yourself out in the cold and _still_ unable to pay your student loan.

  • by DavidTC ( 10147 ) <slas45dxsvadiv.v ... m ['x.c' in gap]> on Monday October 19, 2009 @10:50AM (#29794233) Homepage

    Yeah, that's what happened. A guy asked a question at a debate, and Obama's team instantly attacked him, and which point the Republicans showed up.

    Which is a bit different from the way everyone else remembers it, where he asked a question, Obama tried roughly to answer it despite him clearly disbelieving it, and that was all.

    ...until the Republicans made a national hero of the guy, inviting him to speak at all their events, without actually bothering to do any research whatsoever.(1) At which point the media decided to look at the question he'd asked and found it total nonsense based on misconceptions about how taxes work, and out-and-out falsehoods on top of that.

    Frankly, I don't mind asking politicians questions that are hypotheticals, even posed as if you're the guy in the hypothetical...but I do mind when the media doesn't do its job and explain why the question everyone's talking about is based on incorrect premises, and here's how taxes actually work for small businesses, and if Joe's hypothetical was true here is how his taxes would change, etc.

    This would require some sort of actually functioning media in this country, so that's probably too much to hope for, though.

    1) Is it just me, or have the Republicans gotten really bad at researching their own people recently? Forget Joe the plumber, Palin's kid was pregnant and they didn't manage to figure that out in advance either.

  • by Space cowboy ( 13680 ) * on Monday October 19, 2009 @11:19AM (#29794617) Journal
    I'm aware of that - and I was split on which way to post it, in fact. The post I was replying to was talking about soviet-style healthcare though, and I thought it was more appropriate to use the old designation, since he was talking about that era. *shrug* it was a toss-up....

    Simon

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...