Ask Slashdot: Good Homeschool Curriculum For CS?? 364
dingo_kinznerhook writes "I grew up in a homeschooling family, and was homeschooled through high school. ( I went on to get a B.S. and M.S. in computer science; my mom has programming experience and holds bachelor's degrees in physics and math — she's pretty qualified to teach.) Mom is still homeschooling my younger brother and sister and is looking for a good computer science curriculum that covers word processing, spreadsheets, databases, intro to programming, intro to operating systems, etc. Does the Slashdot readership know of a high school computer science curriculum suitable for homeschooling that covers these topics?"
You don't understand what CS is (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
I don't know, writing a good word processor would certainly require a good knowledge of Computer Science. In fact, it seems to be so hard that nobody has managed to do it well so far.
Re: (Score:3)
You've obviously never used Nota Bene.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft actually did it twice, once on the Mac and once on the PC. Of course, it's been quite some time since Office '97, and even longer since Word 5.1...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
give him a break: he's being home schooled. Which probably explains word processing being CS...
Re:You don't understand what CS is (Score:4, Funny)
Re:You don't understand what CS is (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:You don't understand what CS is (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:You don't understand what CS is (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I had a (well known and respected) professor in college who used to use spreadsheets to build neural networks. After seeing that, I gained a lot of respect for both the man and the tool.
Re: (Score:2)
Years ago I was taking a Java class. My wife was writing software for a synthetic aperture radar system and one of the key portions of her work was done by a physicist that did all his work in MS Excel. Then her employer would hire an intern to type the output from the spreadsheet (columns of numbers) into a flat file that their software could read.
I had a lot of fun showing her how to write something that could open and read the spreadsheets. While I helped her do that I got to see a bit of this guy's work
Re: (Score:2)
A kid sees a word processor or a spreadsheet as something they use when they have to do so, because of school. Most kids won't experiment with them.
A course teaches you not only the basics of how to use the programs, but other features that are occasionally very useful but not apparent to the casual user. Things like pivot tables aren't obvious to someone who only cranks up Word to do book reports.
I had used office software since WP 5.1, and Microsoft Office since Office 95. When I went back to college,
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If you need a course to teach something, you must not want to do it very much.
You mean like a Mom apparently teaching an entire high school curriculum? I had a handful of excellent teachers in high school but I can't think of any of them who could have taught all the subjects.
Re:You don't understand what CS is (Score:4, Interesting)
Come on Slashdot, be reasonable. Maybe these topics don't represent what would be found in a traditional CS curriculum for college, but they sound like the very subjects that a pre-CS course at the high school level would be wise to teach.
Exactly. Many computer classes in middle and high school are mostly fluff...at best review for kids who have been using a computer since birth.
I've taught my partially homeschooled kids (10 and 13) how to use the common OSs and basic tools (OSX, Ubuntu, Google Apps, Open Office), how to create and manage content (docs, spreadsheets, graphs, simple web pages, blogs, wiki), navigating and managing their drives (so I don't have to help them find their crap after they've created it), and how to be pretty much self-sufficient on their machines (installing apps, patching, upgrading distros, connecting to printers, etc.). When they get to be 14 or 15, I'll start them on databases, writing queries, and maybe writing a few scripts. At that point they'll be on their own to decide what they want to do with computers. My goal is not to make them CS majors, but to give them enough information to decide if they want to be a CS major...and the skills necessary to use a computer as a tool.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
And there were database electives. And every class assumed programming, in addition to a few specifically on programming to make sure that you knew the languages that were common when the professors were in college (and yes, I even had to program a single program on pu
Re: (Score:2)
(and yes, I even had to program a single program on punchcard because the professor thought it necessary to teach the old ways).
An ex-colleague had to use punch cards daily on his first job... the guy is younger than me and punch cards were already off the curriculum when I studied CS. One shouldn't assume that a technology will never be encountered and thus shouldn't be taught just because it has been deemed out of fashion.
Re: (Score:3)
I mostly agree, MS Office (or office applications in general) has no place in in CS. Aside from maybe a brief tour of the IDE at the beginning (let them choose to use an alternate environment later), CS should be application and platform agnostic.
However, as someone who was required to take an Office course in high school (purely for credits), the most important thing that people take for granted is spending a few weeks teaching typing. IMO any high school CS curriculum, should have a few weeks on typing. I
Re: (Score:2)
Elementary school typing was far from universal when the Commodore 64 was available - your school was the exception, not the rule.
I'm probably around the same age (I had a Commodore at home during elementary school, that I two-fingered half to death) and the local school system I attended taught it in high school. When I took the course, half our time was spent on 286s and the other half on IBM electric typewriters.
I believe typing is now taught in middle school in my district.
Re:You don't understand what CS is (Score:5, Insightful)
Consequentially, using Office is less of a computer science curriculum element and more like a general life skill that involves computers. It's true that working with computers as a user is an important preface to learning how to program and think in the exact terms of a computer, but by no means does it fit the same position as arithmetic does for mathematics.
A better post might be "c'mon, guys, he's got a Masters degree. Stop being dicks about semantics and realise that he knows what he means better than most of you do."
Re: (Score:2)
Eh? Your analogy fails. The "addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division" of CS is AND, OR, NOT, XOR, union, intersection, and subtraction.
Word processing and operating systems barely qualifies as an intro to IT, if that much at all.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a silly response and demonstrates a limited understanding of the scope of your discipline and where it fits into the continuum of education. Sure, these topics are not appropriate for a college level CS course, but that doesn't mean they aren't related to computer science.
You are entirely incorrect. GP is right on. None of that has anything to do with Computer Science. NONE OF IT, regardless of the level. The OP has merely expressed an extremely common misnomer... that stuff that has to do with computers is Computer Science. In fact, Computer Science has nothing to do with computers. It has to do with very specialized Mathematics. You can think of it more correctly as the Science of Math rather than the Science of Computers. I think it should have been called "Computing Scie
Re: (Score:2)
A good CS program should allow the student understand, on a fundament
Re:You don't understand what CS is (Score:5, Insightful)
As someone with a BS in Computer Science and an in-progress Masters; I think it's safe to say anyone who is offended by this question is a d-bag.
Unless you are certain it's being used as a backhanded insult, all this means is someone doesn't fully understand what 'Computer Science' is. That's really not a reason to be offended. I don't really understand Physics, or Chemical Engineering, I'd hate to be afraid of asking a harmless question because I'm likely to offend some overly sensitive guy waiting to jump over a n0ob who only wants to learn.
Besides, what qualifies as 'Computer Science' is pretty subjective anyway. I took a 300-level 'Computer Science' class that was called 'Unix'. It covered basics of the operating system....things as simple as creating directories were covered. And it was very much apart of the Computer Science curriculum at a moderately respected 4-year University.
Dietel & Dietel (Score:5, Informative)
As far as intro to programming goes, when I took High School Computer Science, our textbook was the Dietel & Dietel C++ How to Program. It was definitely aimed at the beginner to intermediate level programmers and did a pretty good job at explaining fundamentals of programming to a bunch of high school sophomores and making it understandable. As I recall, you can probably go through several chapters per class because it's not so dense and impenetrable that you need bash your way through.
Here's a link to the 7th edition: http://www.amazon.com/How-Program-7th-Paul-Deitel/dp/0136117260 [amazon.com]
However, there are plenty of copies of 6th editions floating around for pretty cheap. If I recall correctly, copies of the 5th edition are even available for download for free, which makes the curriculum that much more cost-effective.
Anyway, best of luck, hope that helps.
Re:Dietel & Dietel (Score:5, Informative)
Good advice.
My thought: It doesn't matter where you learn or how you learn, the fundamentals are universal.
AQA [aqa.org.uk] offers a suggested schooling curriculum and past papers for the exams they set. Sure it's UK not US, but C is C, HTML is HTML, MS Office is MS Office and small furry creatures from alpha centauri make great soup if you put them in the blender for long enough.
Re:Dietel & Dietel (Score:4, Funny)
C is C, HTML is HTML, MS Office is MS Office and small furry creatures from alpha centauri make great soup if you put them in the blender for long enough.
Blender: Now THAT needs a good tutorial!
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, there is no perceived glory in writing docs - of any kind.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The only thing to watch out for is that, given the rapid pace of computer technology development, many older edition training course may have been rendered obsolete by the passage of time. I would be cautious about material older than 10 years (circa 2000), and material older than 15 years (circa 1995) is probably too old to use. Observe the changes to Java, C++, Ruby, and streaming media in those time frames
Of course, many of the fundamentals of computer science (algorithms and algorithm analysis) and so
Re: (Score:3)
As far as intro to programming goes, when I took High School Computer Science, our textbook was the Dietel & Dietel C++ How to Program. It was definitely aimed at the beginner to intermediate level programmers ...
Lucky you, C++ didn't exist when I went to High School. Hell, the first real book on C had just come out, and certainly wasn't in use in my high school.
That said, Steven Prata's Primer on C++ [amazon.com] was pretty useful for OO concepts. It's now in it's 5th edition. Sigh. But it all depends upon what you want to learn. In the Java language (my current meal ticket) I wouldn't even know what to point you to since all the books I originally used are horribly out of date and I haven't bought one in at least 7 years. I ca
Re:Dietel & Dietel (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I was homeschooled in highschool, and I can tell you that it was hard to get along with the other homeschool families .. as soon as they found out that we weren't "christian" we were summarily kicked out. I didn't really learn programming (futzed around with BASIC on our TRS-80), but I taught myself HTML, and a lot about computers just by using one. Now I run a computer repair shop and do web design on the side. The most important thing I learned was how to teach things to myself.
To answer the FQ, first
Avoid the office suite stuff (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm going to second this on a limited scale.
I took like 4 Office classes throughout High School (only one of which was not the exact same as the others--multiple high schools and cheating the system). The only thing I remember from any of them is what some of the concepts are called, which only makes going looking on Google or elsewhere for them that much easier. And really, if the student learns well this way, they should just be given a list of those concepts by name, and then taught how to find what they
programming practice (Score:5, Informative)
For little live code practice problems in python and java there's http://codingbat.com/ [codingbat.com]
There's Google's complete free python class at http://code.google.com/edu/languages/google-python-class/ [google.com]
For a huge library of cs assignments, try the nifty assignments archive at http://nifty.stanford.edu/ [stanford.edu]
Re:programming practice (Score:5, Informative)
Don't Forget MIT's OpenCourseWare Intro to Computer Science lectures. It might move at a faster pace than for a high school student, but it should give your mother some idea as to how to structure the lessons and concepts.
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-00-introduction-to-computer-science-and-programming-fall-2008/video-lectures/ [mit.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, not your mother, icknay, but the person who Asked Slashdot.
Give them a system they can hack (Score:4, Interesting)
spreadsheets and word-processing? (Score:2)
Ok, maybe too harsh, that might be fine for HS. But most university CS curricula start by teaching you a programming language---how to do structured program, incrementally adding features and complexity. I don't see why HS should be so different, it's not like it's difficult if you're remotely suited to the topic. Why not give your siblings a leg up on the competition, check out major university CS programs and start from there---from experience, even grade
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly though office skills will be useful no matter what field the kid ends up in, so that should be first. Google-fu as well. Those are skills needed whether you get an AC certificate from your local commercial vo-tech place, or go on to CS at top tier colleges.
But as others have said, once the basics of *use* are there, start 'em with a programming language.
Re: (Score:3)
But most university CS curricula start by teaching you a programming language
True, but incidental. The programming language is taught in order to teach algorithms. So really, most CS curricula begin by teaching algorithms (with some teaching language you'll never see again), descrete math and logic. Computer Science is not programming, and programming is not Computer Science.
They should ask you... (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't you know, with a masters degree, something about what goes into the field?
Your mother is already qualified to and is teaching computer science, directly by not directly teaching it. Have her teach them about logic and calculus, i guess. What a strange question, really.
MIT Open CourseWare (Score:2)
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/ [mit.edu] would be a good starting point. Advanced? Yes. The beauty of home schooling is that the curriculum can meet the needs of the student, not the lowest common denominator.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
The beauty of home schooling is that the curriculum can meet the needs of the student, not the lowest common denominator.
When you are home schooling just two kids, one of them will ALWAYS be the lowest common denominator. One of them will also always be below the class average in grades, and below the class average in IQ.
Much better to be batch-schooled, your odds of being above average are better.
Re: (Score:3)
I take it you didn't do so well in statistics and probability yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
I take it you didn't do so well in statistics and probability yourself.
Can you explain how one person cannot help but be below the average of anything when you have a population of just two? Unless, of course, the two are the same, and then neither will be above average. Sounds just as bad.
Re: (Score:2)
IT vs CS, not the same thing... (Score:2)
Troll? (Score:3, Insightful)
Kids home-schooled into the high school level that don't already have competence with word processors and spreadsheets? A guy with a MS in CS who talks about word processing in the same sentence as computer science? If he wanted to push more buttons he'd have explained that his mom thought Linux was for commies. Seriously, don't feed the troll.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm inclined to agree. Quite puzzling to make sense of it.
I would like to know what schools the OP and mother got their multiple degrees from.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't do it (Score:5, Insightful)
I can't tell you the number of times I've seen badly written, unclear, badly formatted reports, papers, recommendations, audits from graduates who may have excellent CS skills but can't string sentences together to put over an idea.
So I'm a grammar Nazi. We're in an exact business. Be exact in putting out ideas. And please don't reply to this with "your welcome"...
Re: (Score:2)
English is hardly an exact business (read: language). Maybe you are suggesting we just remove duplication definitions from dictionaries? We could also remove opposites and adjectives, replacing them with double- and un-!
I learned by taking apart BASIC games... (Score:3)
CS is more than just how to code, but honestly: Learning to write a bit of working code first helps loads.
I taught my 11 year old brother how to code in C, C++, Java, SQL, JavaScript, (he's now 20, and learning Perl & Python on his own).
He didn't get the theory until he could compile stuff and play with real working examples (as I did), and for him, everything we needed was in The Really Big Index. [oracle.com] Everything from the concept of Objects and variables, to arrays, branches, algorithms, GUIs, concurrency, graphics, client / servers, etc -- After the first two trails he was studying all by himself, and mastering the programming part of CS. After Java, C/C++ and JavaScript were nothing more than learning the syntax and standard libraries. We installed PostgreSQL, and he picked up SQL in two weeks. I'm helping him write a new scripting language for an existing game engine to learn compiler design -- He's beyond his fellow students, and sometimes even the CS professor in many areas simply due to experience.
As far as tests go -- I don't know about that. Tests are bogus anyhow. Have them come up with a reasonable project that they can complete and learn by doing. You can get a curriculum and do course work, but first get them coding (also note: if they don't give a damn about writing code, you will never make them want to -- Good programmers are born not made).
Uhhh, seriously?? (Score:3)
Is it just me or is there something fishy going on here? Can't decide if this guy is a troll or not.
I went to a real high school and learned to program in my free time by myself. Just get them a computer and either let them come up with projects to do or give them an assignment. Seriously, its pretty easy to learn shit on your own nowadays and a person who is home schooled should know this.
Besides that, what if their passion isn't in computer science? It most certainly isn't for everyone, and I find the only good ones are ones who actually want to do it.
The OP reeks of bullshit.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. It does seem a bit fishy. But if we are going to bite, I guess I would suggest K&R C and a good book on discrete math.
I wish someone had suggested K&R C to me in the beginning instead of mucking my way through more complicated languages. It is compact, dense and the exercises do the job. And discrete math, well I lucked out and it was one of the easy maths for my major (history), but it ended up being invaluable (ended up writing code for a living). It is one of those things they really shou
carnegie mellon or MIT (Score:3)
http://oli.web.cmu.edu/openlearning/
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/
Send them to public school (Score:2)
as you've seen by now... (Score:2)
Computer Science is not Word Processing. Office skill are important, but they aren't Comp Sci. Back in the old days, Computer Science was part of the Business department curriculum (at least it was in my High School), but it quickly spawned off to its own program in Science and went from there.
You need a two pronged approach. The first is word processing, spreadsheets, and some graphics. Good basic computer user skills. Gets the kids over their fear factor and gets them using the tool. From there you
Computer literacy is what youre after... (Score:3)
Use a similar approach with programming. Find a suitable starting language and find a book that follows the concept-tutorial method. To make things a bit more challenging in this area my instructor gave us custom projects that went outside the scope of the objective text, but still relied on lessons we had learned
Re: (Score:2)
"When I was in high school we had a comprehensive Office 2003 textbook...."
Thanks for making me feel old.
Functional programming (Score:2)
First, office suite applications are not computer science. If you want to teach the CS version of word processing, teach them LaTeX. In the meantime, I recommend something that I didn't do: start with a functional language like Scheme (I started with K&R). I TA'd for a Java intro class and it never went well. All the PL (programming language) grad students I know hate C++, and that leaves Python, Ruby, and the functional languages.
Scheme is pretty simple, and probably appropriate for HS-level course
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd suggest common lisp instead of scheme if you're going to take what people like using into consideration. All the lisp programmers I know hate the scheme version.
Home schooling is not a joke. (Score:2, Interesting)
I have used these successfully when home schooling my children for any of the Microsoft Office products.
http://www.technokids.com
Best CS home school curriculum... (Score:2)
An Apple IIe with an assembler, and a few compilers. Or an IBM XT with the same. Give it to them with some old books and tell them to do something fun with it.
That should keep them out of your hair for a while. Isn't that the whole point of a home school curriculum?
Computer Science Unplugged (Score:4, Informative)
For the younger crowd, I can highly recommend Computer Science Unplugged [csunplugged.org]. It is a great introduction to the fundamentals of computer science - algorithmic basics, information coding and entropy, finite state automata, and a bunch of other good stuff. Interestingly, the entire course is done without a computer. It has exposition, exercises, and games that reinforce those fundamentals.
It's about 10 hours of coursework, it's free, and it's geared toward the 8-12 year old crowd. My 7-year old didn't have any troubles with it, and was always hungry for more. The novelty of teaching computer science without touching a computer is also compelling.
Now, if anyone can recommend some good coursework on introduction to programming and basic algorithms for the 8-10 set, I'd appreciate it. I haven't found any good educational materials for Scratch (it's all pretty ad-hoc and amateurish), and I think Alice is a bit much for sit-you-down-and-start-programming. Any personal experiences?
Re: (Score:2)
You might look at bootstrapworld.org, a project to teach functions and programming to middle schoolers. (I mentioned it in another post, but it's directly relevant to the question.) Their after-school programs (and summer camps) are interesting because they also teach testing (facilitated by functional code) and code reviews (students present their code in a Q and A session) and use pair programming.
Qualified? (Score:3)
Not necessarily. Just because someone is learned in a particular field does not mean they have the skills to dispense the knowledge in an effective manner. I'm not the only one who's encountered people who are experts in their field, yet lack the ability to coherently explain even the basis because they don't have the skills to do so.
Logo style (Score:2)
Programming links for Kids (Score:2)
Arduino (Score:2)
The Course Books I Used to Teach... (Score:2)
Its probably way too late for my comment to be modded up for the submitter, but here goes.
I've taught "Into to Word Processing" and "Intro to Spreadsheets" type courses at some local adult education colleges. The best books I found were the Shelly Cashman series, such as "Microsoft Office 2007 Introductory Concepts and Techniques". Good explanations with screenshots, and good exercises.
Here's an Amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Office-2007-Introductory-Techniques/dp/0324826842/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UT [amazon.com]
people (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
A GATTAling gun - used to shoot holes in genetics theories.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
70% of homeschooled children are in very religious families. Assuming that a homeschooler is republican isn't absurd.
Re: (Score:2)
70% of homeschooled children are in very religious families. Assuming that a homeschooler is republican isn't absurd.
What a coincidence, 70% of people also make up statistics whenever they need them in an argument!
Re: (Score:3)
The actual figure is 33 percent, according to the 2001 U.S. census [census.gov], or 42 percent if you count the families that cited "morality" as their reason.
Re: (Score:2)
The link you gave doesn't cite the census, it cites the '96 and '99 National Household Education Surveys. I got 70% from this paper [ncspe.org], which cites the 2003 NHES.
Re: (Score:3)
I got 70% from this paper [ncspe.org], which cites the 2003 NHES.
Well that's weird, because the 2003 NHES results are right here, [ed.gov] and they give the figure as 30 percent, down from 33 percent in the earlier survey (the figure being the number of parents who reported religious instruction as being the most important reason for home schooling). In fact, the report you cite repeats the same data; it then goes on to claim that 70 percent of home schooled children come from "very religious families," but it doesn't explain the methodology used to derive that category. I'd love
Re: (Score:3)
The Department of Education's statistics disagree:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009030.pdf [ed.gov]
Which is strange because they cite the exact same phrasing "religious or moral instruction".
In either case, the number is significant.
Re: (Score:3)
That data just indicates the number of families that reported "a desire to give religious or moral instruction" as a factor. I don't think that establishes the family as a "highly religious family." It could just mean the parent wants to be able to instruct the child about sex, proper behavior, etc., because they think this kind of education is lacking in the school.
But the same families were asked what the most important factor in choosing home schooling was, and there only ~30 percent responded that relig
Re: (Score:2)
Here's the study.
By the way, I didn't need an argument. It wasn't me who called OP a republican.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry. Link: http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/OP132.pdf [ncspe.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Homeschool? (Score:4, Interesting)
I had to be home schooled for a few years because of Cancer. Basically I'd miss so much school because of chemo and sickness I couldn't qualify as a full time student.
Then I went back, same friends as before but much more advanced math, science and reading levels. I was doing math, science and reading at high school graduation levels from 4th grade on.
And now I work in public education, no douchebag parents, no being out of touch with reality, no religion.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Homeschool? (Score:5, Insightful)
Those kids will grow up to be out of touch with reality, thinking they're the center of their tiny universe while being hopeless at everything other than their field of speciality.
... much like un-informed, self-righteous, snarky, cranio-rectal Slashdot writers. Get out of the basement much do ya?
Because of course you know, it is possible for a home-schooled child to become socialized with OTHER home schooled children. Or with other people in the community around them as they go about their daily lives in their neighborhood, or at the market, or gas station, or workplace, or parks, or beaches, or if they are religious, at Church. Because you know, people who go to all of those places actually speak to each other, and thus learn social skills. Unlike public school children who learn their social skills... in much the same way, actually. With the added pleasure of school imposed artificial hierarchical dominance games into the mix.
Re:Homeschool? (Score:5, Informative)
Those kids will grow up to be out of touch with reality, thinking they're the center of their tiny universe while being hopeless at everything other than their field of speciality.
You have no idea what you are talking about. I homeschooled my kids and they have a larger and more diverse circle of friends than you can possibly imagine. Unlike school kids, their friends are also from a wider variety of ages because my children didn't experience the age-range apartheid that you would consider 'normal' where the majority of the children you would interact with each day were within 12 months of your own age. My daughter's 16th birthday party had more than 70 kids and 30 adults on the guest list - and these really are close friends who she has spent more quality time with growing up than anything you get out in the school yard between classes.
I'm a software engineer, but for university the kids have gone into fields as widely different as biotech, justice/law, arts/language and design. One of them went and lived in Beijing for a year to immerse herself in the culture/language when she turned 18. Another has travelled to Japan, China and the USA regularly since they were 17 years old. At 13 years old, one of the kids went and stayed with a friend's family in the USA for three months - even saved up the airfare on her own by doing babysitting around the neighborhood.
I guess that I wouldn't agree with the same homeschooling that you don't agree with - but unfortunately for you the reality of what the vast majority of homeschoolers are doing has nothing to do with your narrow prejudiced ideas. For every homeschooling parent who is keeping their kids in the basement, I'll show you 10 school kids who are wasting their lives and potential without any help from their parents at all.
It's your call.
--D
Re:Homeschool? (Score:4, Informative)
Growing up, I played on the same soccer team for years. One of the kids I became friends with was home schooled. His parents were both friendly, sociable, well educated (and from the looks of their house, doing quite well financially).
The kid was as normal as anyone else on the team. He had plenty of friends and did pretty good with the girls too. Honestly, looking back, he seemed to be a few years ahead of the curve; and was one of the most genuinely nice kids I knew. I don't know where the stereotype of home-schooled kids being freaks came from; but in my limited experience, not true.
Re: (Score:2)
Your one mistake: NO ONE is as big a stereotypical, reactionary, thoughtless douchebag as you're pretending to be. In the future, your tactic would be more believable if you dialed it down a notch or two.
Just a tip.
- aj
Re:Forget about it (Score:5, Funny)
The most important thing is to get him laid. Take him to european countries for as many months as you can legally stay for, and force him to approach girls and women again and again.
So the plan is if he gets rejected often enough, he'll just spontaneously turn into a computer programmer???
Re: (Score:3)
High school taught me that the jocks were invincible (even when they lose), that tenure is more important than competence, and that it's easy to snow HS English teachers with BS.
So essentially, HS prepared you for real life?
Re: (Score:3)
Sorry, McFly, but most of the jocks end up with a business degree and become the bosses of the straight-A nerds. Some of the rest become politicians and become the bosses of everyone. The high school janitors are mostly drawn from the stoners (the ones who d
Re: (Score:2)
Right, because CS geeks are well-appreciated in public school peer groups, and won't be ostracized at all. If you're the kind of person who can only learn social skills in school, you probably won't learn them there anyway... either that or you'll only learn a twisted version of what "proper" behavior is.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
send them to high school with other children.
I had the opposite experience. All of the kids at my high school were almost completely computer illiterate. Besides, doing this is far from being required.