Google Opens First Retail Outlet In London 172
theodp writes "Google is following in the footsteps of Apple and Microsoft. The London Evening Standard reports that the world's first 'Google Store' has opened in a PC World on London's gadget street, Tottenham Court Road. Officially known as 'the Chromezone,' the 285sq. ft. pop-up 'shop within a shop,' which only sells Google's Chromebook laptop and a few accessories such as headphones, will run for three months up to Christmas. But if the low-key experiment is successful, Google could follow Apple in opening permanent stores around the world. 'It is our first foray into physical retail,' said Google's Arvind Desikan. 'This is a new channel for us and it's still very, very early days. It's something Google is going to play with and see where it leads.'"
What are they going to sell? (Score:1, Insightful)
Just wondering what physical item google has for sale? RFID kits so you can outfit every item in your home and search it's location in your home via google search?
where are my keys?
I'm feeling lucky
Re:What are they going to sell? (Score:5, Interesting)
If you had RTFA, you would see that they are going to sell Chromebooks and things to go with them like headphones. Yeah, it would have been a great idea to put it in the summary, too bad they didn't... No, wait, there it is. In the summary:
What I want to know is what other computers one can get for 349 pounds.
Re:What are they going to sell? (Score:5, Interesting)
What I want to know is what other computers one can get for 349 pounds.
For £349, you could very decent laptop... This being Slashdot, I kinda skimmed TFA rather than actually reading it, but are they seriously selling the Chromebook for that much money? That's ridiculous. I was able to buy a 3lb 13" ultraportable for about £250 ($400 CAD), and if I'd had another $150 in the budget for it, I could have upgraded it quite nicely. And that's not even considering other form factors that are a lot cheaper, like a 14" or a 15" laptop where you're not as concerned about weight.
Re: (Score:2)
Did said ultraportable come with a mobile radio built in?
Sadly those radios have nasty premium nailed too them, dropping them from something can reduce the cost by $100.
Re: (Score:2)
It has wifi, just like the £349 version... it does not have 3G like the £399 version, but it was available as an upgrade option at configuration time (it's a Dell), and with 3G built-in, it would still have cost less than £399.
Aside from the fact that 3G data is way too expensive in this country (Canada), the main reason I didn't go with built-in 3G data is that it would have required that I buy Windows with the laptop. For some reason known only to Dell, the Linux versions of their laptop
Re: (Score:2)
Well color me surprised, i could have sworn the mobile radio was not optional. That puts things in a whole new light.
Re: (Score:3)
In a world where a locked down underpowered touchscreen that you can't upgrade but have to buy a complete new one is the future, the chromebook will probably do really well.
Re: (Score:2)
For £349, you could very decent laptop... This being Slashdot, I kinda skimmed TFA rather than actually reading it, but are they seriously selling the Chromebook for that much money? That's ridiculous. I was able to buy a 3lb 13" ultraportable for about £250 ($400 CAD), and if I'd had another $150 in the budget for it, I could have upgraded it quite nicely. And that's not even considering other form factors that are a lot cheaper, like a 14" or a 15" laptop where you're not as concerned about weight.
Lex talionis mofos.
Can I be the first to say Google Tax?
I will go to the mat with "I can build a system _!EXACTLY!_ like it for less, but I don't want this and that feature or the form factor, Google always charges more for the same, GOOGLE TAX!1"
Re: (Score:2)
No you can't build a system cheaper, and it's not a google tax. It's the price Samsung charges for the SSD chromebook.
Prices do not compare! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"A price in American dollars often means the same in euros and only slightly less in pounds"
Worry less about people in N. American and more about yourself; since you don''t even have it right.
Re: (Score:2)
And for us in Australia, a price in USD often means as much as 2x as much in AUD. Even recently when the AUD has been worth more than the USD.
Re: (Score:2)
what size SSD drives do those 250 pound laptops come with?
How many gigs of memory?
Anyhow, that's not Google's price, that's Samsung's pricing.
All this makes me want to ask:
Why do you think that 250 laptop is better?
Re: (Score:2)
Would your decent laptop for that price have SSD?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
No such requirement. The Chromebooks are built to leverage the HTML5 web storage API so that say something like Gmail or Google Docs is usable offline (tho for the latter that support is so far read only, likely because of issues with tracking concurrent edits and such).
Re: (Score:2)
So they're brave enough to ship it when you can't write a document while offline. Wow. If they're taking a leaf from Apple's book in opening stores they should take another leaf from Apple's book and not ship products until they have something worth shipping.
Re: (Score:2)
So it wasn't worth Apple releasing the most profitable phone in the history of the world? Millions of people think it was worth them shipping it, otherwise they wouldn't have bought it. It may not have had every feature, but the ones it did have worked - which is the point.
Re: (Score:1)
What I want to know is what other computers one can get for 349 pounds.
For that you can build a dual- or triple- core machine with a DVD burner and a decent GPU. Well, if you spend the money in the USA, in dollars :) Or buy an Asus Transporter with the keyboard/battery dock. Or buy pretty much any other netbook.
Re: (Score:3)
What I want to know is what other computers one can get for 349 pounds.
I honestly can't believe they're selling a Samsung "chromebook" for £350. I literally read TFA just to check you hadn't got that wrong. I'm completely flabbergasted that they would be selling what is basically a "thin client" Atom laptop with a 12" screen for that. I mean, you can get a real Samsung-brand laptop for less than that.
I MIGHT have been interested in Chromebooks if they had massively undercut conventional netbooks, or had fantastic new hardware features (epic battery life, for example). Bu
Re: (Score:2)
I think they're trying to go for the less-is-more branding (think about it - for the longest time the typical iPod did less than most competing mp3 players and yet commanded a hefty premium).
For small businesses/etc the fact that it has almost zero overhead to support long-term would also be a plus that would add value.
But, yes, I scratch my head over the decision to price these ABOVE comparable systems that run general-purpose OSes (windows tax and all). If they cost $150 US or something like that they'd
Re:What are they going to sell? (Score:4, Interesting)
There's no such thing as "less-is-more branding". Less is more is an attribute of good design. Brand is an assurance of quality.
Actually the iPod did far more. It had an ecosystem that included software on the PC to manage and sync music files, and soon after to purchase, download and sync to the MP3 player with minimal user intervention. That's all far more than simply mounting the MP3 player as a drive, and leaving the file management as a task for the user to do.
The "less" involved was less for the user to have to do. Less for the user to worry about. That, together with the attractive industrial design were reasons for the iPod to take off. People bought it despite it's higher cost because it was a better value proposition.
Now of course Apple has a brand that assures people of a high quality product. But that brand was (re)made largely by the iPod (after the nadir of the brand in the 1990s.)
As to Google, they have a quality brand in search, for largely the same reasons - they do a lot of quality engineering behind the scenes, but put it behind a simple to use but quality user interface.
But their brand doesn't transfer too well to most other things they do. Except perhaps email. Certainly not to hardware. They'd have to extend the brand into that market. It's not impossible, but the odds are against them.
Re: (Score:2)
" It had an ecosystem that included software on the PC to manage and sync music files, and soon after to purchase, download and sync to the MP3 player with minimal user intervention."
oh, how soon people forget. Apple had to be figuratively bludgeoned to get iTunes on the PC. Initially they had said it would be an Apple only device..also firewire only device. Also, the firt couple of version of iTunes for windows where clearly rushed to market. Apples best competency is rewrtinig history.
You also seem to for
Re: (Score:3)
oh, how soon people forget.
Given that I owed one of those early iPods, and you didn't, my recollection is far better than yours.
Apple didn't have to be "bludgeoned" into releasing a Windows iPod. They released the first generation as a Mac peripheral, then once they saw how successful it was, they released the second generation for Windows as well, a mere 9 months after the first generation was launched. That's far from being bludgeoned. In fact the general response was one of surprise when the Windows iPod came out.
You also seem to forget moving into the mp3 arena was outside apples core competency as well.
On the contrary,
Re: (Score:2)
iTunes for windows
The horror, the horror.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is a mobile radio in there.
Re: (Score:2)
Not with SSD.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not really sure what you mean, but my first netbook (a 9" Asus eeePC) had an SSD hard drive. Unfortunately they seem to have gon out of fashion a bit now (I guess it's a tough sell compared to a 250 GB spinning disk drive, what with peoples' attitude to "bigger numbers are better" for PC specs), but that netbook set me back only £200. It had an Atom processor and a full-featured OS too.
Re: (Score:2)
I MIGHT have been interested in Chromebooks if they had massively undercut conventional netbooks
Exactly, yu can get a perfectly reasonable netbook for GBP200, the Chromebook would have to be about GBP100 to make it a appealing option.
Re:What are they going to sell? (Score:5, Informative)
The tech exchange rate is more like £1 to $1.
Re: (Score:2)
I was hoping for Android Market gift cards like those Apple is selling in every store ever. Limiting the service to those who have credit cards was a terrible idea.
Re: (Score:3)
wondering what physical item google has for sale
Privacy invasion devices disguised as limited functionality internet access device AKA a netbook.
Re: (Score:3)
They are selling you.
Re: (Score:2)
Just wondering what physical item google has for sale? RFID kits so you can outfit every item in your home and search it's location in your home via google search?
where are my keys?
I'm feeling lucky
That would be SO ... FUCKING ... AWESOME.
Now all I've got to do is rationalize to myself that it's worth being a Google statistic for the privilege. After all, what's one data point among billions, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Where is my wife?
I'm feeling lucky.
You know, there might be a business case to this yet....
Let's get physical. (Score:3)
But if the low-key experiment is successful, Google could follow Apple in becoming evil. 'It is our first foray into evil,' said Google's Asmodeus Dessicant. 'This is a new channel for us and it's still very, very early days. It's something Google is going to play with and see where it leads.'"
Re: (Score:2)
Right, because Google is a totally, 100% un-evil advertising firm.
Re: (Score:2)
They are. Their practices in the industry are far from evil.
Re: (Score:2)
They are. Their practices in the industry are far from evil.
A "good" Nazi is still a Nazi.
It's at the north end of Tottenham Court Road (Score:3, Informative)
People interested in checking it out should use the Warren st. tube station rather than TCR.
Re: (Score:2)
I thought TCR station was closed anyway?
Re: (Score:3)
Re:It's at the north end of Tottenham Court Road (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
But not until the Crossrail works there are finished. At the moment you need to change at Oxford Circus for the Victoria Line.
Re: (Score:3)
Walk up the right hand side of the road and you will avoid it.
Would have been nice for Nexus One (Score:5, Interesting)
I think the Nexus One would have been a lot more successful if they had physical stores... I mean I'm still using mine and love it (it's a device you can really get attached to, despite its flaws and that it's outdated) but I've only ever seen one other one in the wild (other than at Maker Faire SF, where dozens of Google employees were using them).
Also, it would have been nice to have someplace to check out and buy the accessories and so on, especially on short notice when necessary.
Despite the fact that you can do everything online these days, there truly is still a major role for retail to play. I would be reluctant to buy a new and unusual computer like the Chromebook without being able to try one myself (as I'm sure people are with Apple products if they haven't used them before), so this will probably be a good strategy for them.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
HTC Desire was the last Smartphone I know of that has *physical buttons*. Which is one thing making me hang on to it to the bitter end. (that and it's still a pretty good phone, after 18 months)
Re: (Score:2)
HTC Desire was the last Smartphone I know of that has *physical buttons*. Which is one thing making me hang on to it to the bitter end. (that and it's still a pretty good phone, after 18 months)
My Desire Z has 40-ish physical buttons, including the Desire-ish small trackpad under the screen
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but the front buttons are capacitative, so bring the same problems, ie poorer user feedback, variable pressure needed to activate them based on atmospheric conditions, inability to find them with your fingers ahead of pressing them since they have no physical shape and would be activated as soon as you touch, accidental activation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, all I want is physical buttons to cover Back, Menu & Home rather than capaitative buttons which seem to be ubiquitous. But thanks.
Re: (Score:2)
Many Samsung Android phones (other than SGS/SGS2) have physical buttons - look here [samsung.com]. Most ZTE phones also have hard buttons.
Re: (Score:2)
Agree - if they had physical stores take up would have been a lot higher (also if they had provided a plan for it - Joe Sixpack is not used to paying $XXX upfront). The main reason for physical stores is that these days phones are quite a personal item. (does it fit in my pocket/hand/handbag/purse/?. Does it look "cool"). I think both factors combined meant that Nexus 1 was an underperformer, despite it being the leading phone of its time.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Google learned and released the Nexus S, available form every carrier that it supports, fully unlocked.
Yes, you can march down to Best Buy and walk home with a Nexus S. Given its age, it's often free with contract these days.
Given how well it sells, Google seems to have fixed that problem.
Really cool stuff (Score:1)
But you can only get to pay with Google Checkout. Which sits right next to useless.
Meh... (Score:5, Interesting)
Why aren't such stores obsolete yet? This is an honest question. Especially for Google, that has online access to billions of customers worldwide, what would such a store offer? For Apple it worked because part of their marketing strategy is to dazzle you with fancy plastic. Is Google trying to do the same?
If there was a Google store in my neighborhood, I would probably drop by out of curiosity. However, whenever I go to an electronics retail store the salesperson ends up ordering the stuff I need anyway because they don't have what I want in stock (and, with my luck, even if they once did they would have probably run out). OK, if all you have to offer is 2-3 versions of the same hardware, your stock will always be up-to-date. However, I still don't see any good enough reason for embracing the costs and the trouble of physical retail sale.
Re: (Score:1)
They're browsable. Looking at stuff online isn't the same as getting to interact with it in the real world.
Also, if anything should happen to the thing you buy, it can be nice with a physical place to go to get it repaired or replaced.
Re: (Score:2)
Google agrees with you, though the millions of people who didn't buy the Nexus-1 (the leading phone of its time) would probably disagree.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As the other reply indicated, Google, a company staffed by nerds like you, thought the same thing with the Nexus One. Though it was the best phone of its time, it failed as a business miserably. Because the vast majority of people out there don't shop the way you and I and the people who work at Google do. Because they aren't nerds like us.
fancy plastic? (Score:2)
Have you ever seen an Apple product? it's all unibody brushed aluminum now. PCs are, for the most part, rickety flexing plastic.
Retail for computers is back for a simple reason--how computers look and feel is more important now than it has ever been as computers have become increasingly portable and consumerized. People want to hold and feel it before buying.
Re: (Score:3)
Because a lot of people want to actually _try_ a device before buying it. Little things like how the keyboard feels, how the screen looks, that sort of thing.
I dearly wish I could just go to a physical store and try a bunch of different e-readers instead of spending tens of hours poring over online reviews trying to tease the bits of information I care about out of them.
Re:Meh... (Score:4, Interesting)
Sometimes...I really hate reviewers. They over complicate everything because well...that's their job. Sometimes the difference between the expensive thing and the cheap thing is so minimal that a normal person (even a nerd) really isn't going to care. I have to sit back and realize that sometimes...I don't really care enough about the difference between the $150 good enough HP TN Panel LCD monitor that I bought and the $350 Samsung IPS panel my friend bought. Yeah his is better...but I once I've got mine, I realized I didn't give a shit because it still looks good enough.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah his is better...but I once I've got mine, I realized I didn't give a shit because it still looks good enough. :p
Interesting that you mentioned this. You should check this out:
http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html [ted.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Because the vast majority of people like to handle expensive items before buying.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't imagine anything less "boutique" than a branch of PC World at the wrong end of Tottenham Court Road.
Sell Google Services, as well . . . (Score:2)
Physical, Schmizical. IT Services is where the money is to be made! Like with IBM, or maybe the new HP. Google could offer paid assistance in their shops for folks who are having problems with Google products. And judging by how often I read here on Slashdot, "Oh, google it yourself!", apparently a lot of folks have problems googling themselves. Let alone other Google products.
Think of a Google Shop as a computer fitness service center . . . with your own Personal Google Cloud Trainer!
Me too! (Score:4, Insightful)
AltaVista: we do search!
Google: me too!
Hotmail: we do online mail
Google: me too!
Nokia: We do smartphones
Apple: we do too, and added touch and apps
Google: me too! and we added nothing.
Sun: We do Java
Google: Me too! Allegedly.
Everyone: We do instant messaging
Google: Me too!
Facebook: We do social
Google: Me too!
Sony/Apple: We do brand-specific shops
MS & now Google: me too!
Bah. I will never understand the love geeks give to this copycat advertising company.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
hmmm iphone was not the first touch screen phone you can get and they never invented apps there was apps tores onother phones before it they just tended to be expensive and not have alot on them.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not what Google does, but how. Google has the ability to realise when something sucks or is broken, and they re-invent it into something that works again. They've done it by enhancing search, simplifying mail, opening up phones, opening up Java, integrating IM and are now hoping to do it with social media and physical retailing. Notice how AltaVista, Hotmail, Nokia and Sun have shrunken back into the shadow of their former glory, yet Google keeps powering along? That's the difference between Google and
Re:Me too! (Score:5, Insightful)
google: "me too - except we do it BETTER"
Re: (Score:2)
Google are significantly ahead, at the very least, with GMail (still cleanest webmail interface on the web, and best spam filters) and GTalk (full server-side chat logging with sync and search).
Re: (Score:3)
AltaVista: we do search!
Google: We do search that gives better results based on what the person actually wants. It includes a calculator, knowledge engine, currency converter and many more little features you'll take for granted all in one.
Hotmail: we do online mail
Google: We do online mail with quite a nice interface that includes chat features integrated into it, along with a labs section to fiddle with stuff. We give a lot more space for free. We are even trying to innovate with the use of priority inbox's and other features that didn't exist before. Yo
Re: (Score:2)
Listing facts doesn't make you a lover; it makes you factually correct.
So, Google sees that other tech companies make money with shops, so the opens a shop...pretty much like every other shop.
Re: (Score:2)
Most of those have merit, but I will say:
* Sun released Java for others to use. You [read: the courts] can argue about the terms of said release, but it was released for free use on computers if not phones [as if they were different...sigh...]. If Google had developed a language called Microsoft J++ that was similar and pushed it as their alternative, you would have a point. Google uses Linux too. That's what it's there for; use.
* Altavista, yahoo, etc did classical AI methods relying heavily on human label
Re: (Score:2)
But his "point" applies it any company in pretty much any other industry.
It's like saying Toyota is a me-too company:
insert list of things ford had first, and replies from Toyota with me too.,.. Im' too lazy
Re: (Score:2)
Whoa there, cowboy. If you want to teach history, first learn what happened in the past. Your line should have read something like:
B&O: We do brand-specific shops
Apple: me too!
or, if you don't want to limit the comparison to entertainment tech companies, insert any of the dozens of branded fashion stores (Levis, etc). Or why not include phone companies, they used to sell their own branded stuff in their own brand stores. Apple was very late in the game of brand stor
It is not a store. We are not Google's customers. (Score:4, Insightful)
It is funny to have a store for the people that are not the customers. We are google's product, the advertisers and the carriers are the customers.
--ditkin
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, except for the part where it's true. Hell, it's even in their 10-K filing. Go ahead, read it. You can find it online.
The problem with Google opening retail stores is that Google is trying to drastically change their business model from one where advertisers are their customers to one where the dude walking down the street is the customer. Right now the dude walking down the street is a *user* - he recognizes the Google brand name because he uses it, but he's never drooled at the mouth over a Googl
Google opens retail store (Score:5, Funny)
COURT ROAD, Tottenham, Friday (NTN) — Internet advertising agency Google is opening its first retail store, [newstechnica.com] selling the Internet-only Chromebook.
"We've put a lot of effort into making it feel welcoming, homely and, dare I say it, 'Googley'," said Arvind Desikan, head of consumer marketing. The revolutionary shopping experience leverages Google's famous abilities in customer service, having no staff. Customers seeking advice on a product can simply log in with their Google account to the in-store forum, where they and other customers can assist each other.
"People will be able to go in and have a play with the devices, so they can get a feel for what it's about and we can monitor their reaction." Persons seeking entry to the store must give their bank account name and glue an RFID tag to their forehead, so as to create a suitably decorous shopping environment, "just like in real life." Should they be discovered to be using a name the Google Identity algorithm considers unlikely, they will be ejected mid-purchase and their GMail and Android phone disabled, for their comfort and convenience.
The store is in Tottenham Court Road, so as to select for the valuable demographic of people who want shiny things and are willing to pay a hundred quid more than they would for an ordinary netbook that does more. A second store will be opened in Lakeside for customers of similar discernment.
The Google store still anticipates more customers than the Microsoft stores. Rumours of the purchase of a Windows 7 phone somewhere in Britain are as yet unconfirmed, despite investigations by sceptics' organisations.
Re: (Score:2)
Not bad. Comes across as better than some of The Onion's stuff. Funnier too...
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Err, HP seemed the have the same issue as Apple regarding getting a proper presentation of their Touchpad. And i suspect Google may have the same problems getting Chromebooks properly demoed. And i think a whole lot of "older" customers store shop more then web shop, especially if the price tag is more then a couple of dollars/pounds/whatever.
Re: (Score:2)
I think Best Buy would disagree. I seem to recall the endless signs of "Pre order the HP Touchpad now!" signs all throughout Best Buy stores for months. Heck, when the Touchpad was released, Best Buy had HP reps with tablets everyone.
Heck, the only other tablets they did ti for were the iPad 2 (obviously), and PlayBook (at least in Canada - RIM's Canadian after all). But after that, it was TouchPad all
Re: (Score:2)
For an outfit like Google or Microsoft, retail is just something they think they should do because Apple did it.
While it's cute that you're trying to make some sort of joke/point of conflating Google & MS as Apple-competitors, this statement is totally wrong for Google.
Google had a real problem trying to get people to look at the Nexus One, I suspect they're having the same problem with early chromebooks. This problem is not quite as dire for Google as it was for Apple (as selling retail product is not
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
not the first (Score:2)
There's Google store in Mountain View, at the 'plex. They sell the same products as their online store [googlestore.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I believe this is in anticipation for when they take over Motorola and have multiple phones to sell.
So it is an entire retail store... (Score:2)
built around one product that they also offer a few basically unimportant, buy anywhere, accessories.
sounds pretty ridiculous to me.
What is their slogan, "Come to the Chromezone where the only choose you will have to make is how many of our single product to buy"
Hardly! (Score:2)
They're hardly 'following in the footsteps of Apple and Microsoft' - Apple spent a fortune on the design of their stores to maximise the amount of time punters spend and maximise the opportunity to convert browsers to sales. I'm pretty sure MS did the same.
Google have setup a stall in the back of someone else's shop (and a chain that is very poorly regarded to boot!). That's not _quite_ the same thing.
Ah Yes, The Scotch Tape Store (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Microsoft thanks you for contribution.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you seriously think that Apple doesn't license a single patent from Microsoft?
Re: (Score:3)
Also, the rack in the background looks messy, and not well thought-through.
Even worse, there's an entire PC World shop in the background, with all the aesthetics you'd expect from a shed full of overpriced printer cartridges and copies of Norton Antivirus at the grimmer end of Tottenham Ct Rd - there's a reason why most fashion boutiques do not open 'pop-up shops' in branches of Lidl or Walmart:
http://www.talkandroid.com/48645-pc-world-will-have-the-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1-starting-august-3/ [talkandroid.com]
http://www.t3.com/news/worlds-first-google-chrome-zone-opens-in-london [t3.com]
Presumably the main j