Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education AI The Internet News

Professor Resigns From Stanford To Launch Online Education Project 162

mikejuk writes "Professor Sebastian Thrun has given up his Stanford position to start Udacity — an online educational venture. Udacity's first two free courses are Building a Search Engine and Programming a Robotic Car. In a moving speech at the Digital Life Design conference, he explained that after presenting the online AI course to thousands of students he could no longer teach at Stanford: 'Now that I saw the true power of education, there is no turning back. It's like a drug. I won't be able to teach 200 students again, in a conventional classroom setting.' Let's hope Udacity works out; Stanford is a tough act to follow."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Professor Resigns From Stanford To Launch Online Education Project

Comments Filter:
  • Gack! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 23, 2012 @05:32PM (#38797395)

    Hope it turns out better than his class did. The other classes were far better managed than the AI course.

  • That was unexpected (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Animats ( 122034 ) on Monday January 23, 2012 @05:42PM (#38797517) Homepage

    That was unexpected. But then, his automatic driving work had already moved to Google.

    He turned around the Stanford CS department, which was embarrassingly bad for years. (I have a degree from there; I know.) It was being run by the mathematical logic people, who were trying to make AI work through predicate calculus and expert systems. That turned out to be a dead end, but the existing faculty didn't want to admit it. Thrun reoriented the department towards statistical methods for AI, and things got moving again.

  • This is the future. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by GoodNewsJimDotCom ( 2244874 ) on Monday January 23, 2012 @05:43PM (#38797527)
    When lectures can be saved to a video format on the Internet, why pay the teacher to deliver the same lecture every year?

    When books can be copied for free, why pay 200$ for a physical version of the book?

    I think the only thing we'll have in terms of live people will be live tutors you can ask questions via advanced IM

    The cool thing about this is that it is the opposite of the "No child gets ahead act", if a kid is motivated, they can watch hundreds of supplemental optional videos related to their course. Or with proper understanding of the subject at hand, they can move ahead to the new videos. Also this is all available for free or nearly free, so the cost of an education is simply 100$ or less for a laptop. This means people across the world who couldn't have access to quality education will. If you're in a 3rd world country with nothing to do all day, maybe you'll devote your life to getting a grand education. We might find new Einsteins popping up and at younger and younger ages.
  • by trout007 ( 975317 ) on Monday January 23, 2012 @05:47PM (#38797573)

    In the first universities anyone could stop in and listen to a lecturer for free. If they were interested in perusing individual education they would work out a fee between the professor and the student. There wasn't any strict curriculum or degrees. The professors paid the university a cut similar to the way a barber shop works today.

    The business model should be the same. Free to watch the lectures and pay for individual attention.

  • This is a big deal (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jholyhead ( 2505574 ) on Monday January 23, 2012 @05:59PM (#38797739)
    Thrun is (I think) the first tenured Professor at a major University to stand down in order to try to bring learning online. Unlike the offerings from Stanford, MIT, Berkeley etc etc, Udacity wont be under the same "Don't damage the university's business model" constraint, so they are truly free to go for broke.

    There has been a lot of criticism of the AI course - most of it by people who didn't attend beyond the first couple of weeks. I finished the course and had a good time doing it. It wasn't without flaws, but I have no doubt that with the necessary financial backing, they can make the necessary improvements and push on to create some remarkable content.

    If they can solve the question of certification, they, and those who will inevitably follow, might just revolutionise the educational landscape.

    And if it all goes wrong, Google wont kick him out of bed.
  • Re:I'm curious, (Score:4, Interesting)

    by malilo ( 799198 ) on Monday January 23, 2012 @07:46PM (#38798883)
    An Associate Professor IS tenured. It's what your title is just after getting tenure. How they keep you on the hook "being a good boy/girl" is to dangle full professorship in front of you (it comes with more money, not just a nice title). In most cases, if you don't make full professor a few years after associate, you don't ever get it. BTW, ''Assistant Professor' is what you are called pre-tenure.
  • by Animats ( 122034 ) on Monday January 23, 2012 @08:28PM (#38799385) Homepage

    Actually, I got a MS from Stanford. The problem was the expert system guys, Feigenbaum and company. They were claiming that expert systems would yield strong AI Real Soon Now. Feigenbaum's 1983 book "The Fifth Generation" shows that optimism at its height. It did not end well. The next decade is referred to as the "AI Winter". [amazon.com]

Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?

Working...