Finally, a Shark With a Laser Attached To Its Head 139
Freshly Exhumed writes in with a Wired story about a nerd/super-villian dream come true. "Marine biologist-cum-TV personality Luke Tipple attached a 50-milliwatt green laser to a lemon shark off the coast of the Bahamas in late April. The escapade was sponsored by Wicked Lasers, a consumer-focused laser manufacturer based in Hong Kong that produces some of the most brilliant — and potentially dangerous — handheld lasers in the world. 'This was definitely a world first,' Tipple told Wired. 'Initially, I told them no. I thought it was a frivolous stunt. But then I considered that it would give us an opportunity to test our clips and attachments, and whatever is attached to that clip, I really don't care. It was a low-powered laser that couldn't be dangerous to anyone, and there's actually useful applications in having a laser attached to the animal.'"
Yes! (Score:5, Funny)
No oblig anything... a freaking shark with a freaking laser on it's head...
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Thanks AC Grammar Nazi!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This is 3rd grade stuff, man.
Grammar nazis get their panties in a bind if you use the present perfect verb tense when the present perfect progressive would have been more appropriate. Knowing the difference between 'it's' and 'its' is more the equivalent of saying '2+2=5' and then calling the person who corrected you a 'math nazi'.
is more the equivalent (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Romanes eunt domus"?
People called Romanes, they go, the house?
Re: (Score:2)
Not in theoretical physics. Just about everything we hold as fact goes out the window.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
That is because "hi" is not a word (in this context)... It is certainly an exception to the rule "put a damn apostrophe on a word when you want to make it all possessive like". If it were not an exception then "his car", "snowsmanns car", and "its car" would all be correct. But "his" is another word entirely, "its" is a form of the word "it".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
or under a different base like base 4 where it equals 10
Re: (Score:2)
yes! troll math!
spoiler - it still equals 4. those ints aren't optional.
Re: (Score:2)
if you found that hard to read, your probably the won in need of communications lessons.
Re: (Score:2)
if you found that hard to read, your probably the won in need of communications lessons.
And you're the one in need of spelling and grammar lessons.
Re: (Score:2)
nope but i feel for you mr whooshie
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
by Anonymous Coward
You're still here! Oh my goodness, I was so worried! I thought you had gone for good! :'D
Re: (Score:2)
No, "its head". Also http://xkcd.com/585/ [xkcd.com]
No, "its fin" [wired.com].
Re: (Score:2)
I'm so going to deviantart to commission a plushie version with working laser.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sharks are cool and they know it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you have an apostrophe for "it is"? :P
Re: (Score:2)
No oblig anything... a freaking shark with a freaking laser on it's head...
Okay, fine but - does it have Hitler’s brain?
Or... (Score:2)
a laser with a shark attached.
So...Bright.. (Score:3, Informative)
50 mW is enough laser power to blind you quite quickly...
Re:So...Bright.. (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Won't save you, the goggles do nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You can get laser goggles that will protect you from most of the exposure of higher-powered lasers. It is simply a combination of a highly-reflective surface plus a bandgap filter. You'd get a 530-580nm filter to work with green lasers and be safe.
Re: (Score:2)
Whooooosh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juFZh92MUOY [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
BTW, was just quoting the Suburbs:
I got my goggles on
And it's so bright
I got my goggles on
And it's so bright (so bright)
I see in color
Not black and white
I see in color
Not black and white
I got my goggles on
And it's so bright
I got my goggles on
And it's so bright (so bright)
I took these little pills
And I'm starting to come on now
I took these little pills
And I'm starting to get on now
I got my goggles on
And it's so bright
I got my goggles on
And it's so bright (so bright)
I feel the water
Swirling around my feet
I fe
Re: (Score:2)
The laser's so bright, I gotta wear shades.
Re: (Score:2)
50 mW is enough laser power to blind you quite quickly...
Yeah - and the shark holding it generally doesn't mind if the animals he's swimming toward suddenly go blind.
mr bond I expect you to be chum (Score:4, Funny)
mr bond I expect you to be chum
Sceptic (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
A red herring, more likely.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, isn't that unforTUNAte?
Stupid (Score:5, Funny)
That's the stupidest thing I've ever seen. There's no way a shark could aim a laser mounted like that. It needs it on its head so the shark can properly sight down the beam and destroy the commanded target.
Re:Stupid (Score:5, Funny)
Focusing on consumers is also a dumb idea for a laser company. You get more repeat customers when they're not on fire.
The next frontier (Score:5, Funny)
To place one on an ill-tempered mutant sea bass.
Re: (Score:2)
Who modded this troll? A Jewfish is a real thing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewfish [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Most likely this specific grouper:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epinephelus_itajara [wikipedia.org]
World Domination (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I like this quote:
But even serious hardcore shark experts like Van Sommeran can relish in the bold absurdity of a laser-equipped shark: “Everything tilts toward this being a disadvantage for the shark. Its laser might blind a pilot and piss off the FAA. Or North Korea might counter-attack it,” he said.
Re: (Score:2)
I like this quote: "...and there's actually useful applications in having a laser attached to the animal." .... Like world domination
I was wondering the same thing, as well as who would have the need for a" useful application" like this. Besides some bald guy with a white Persian cat.
Jeez Luieez (Score:1)
It's MAY 1st, not April 1st. (May 2nd actually)
Our undoing... (Score:2)
And so it begins...
Slashdotted... (Score:1)
... or maybe the shark just fired on a couple underwater fibers
Re: (Score:2)
Alternatively http://www.buzzfeed.com/donnad/sharks-mounted-with-laser-beams [buzzfeed.com]
Fin (Score:2, Informative)
The laser was attached to the dorsal fin, not the head. Seriously, how can you get this wrong?
"Not dangerous to anyone"? (Score:2)
A 50-milliwatt green laser would be a class-IIIb device, right?
Re: (Score:2)
A 50-milliwatt green laser would be a class-IIIb device, right?
Yeah, and it's well into the IIIb territory (which covers such a broad power range it's hardly a helpful classification). 50mW is sufficient to cause instant permanent retinal burns, or permanent blindness due to retinal bleeding. Even an extremely brief exposure to one eye could cause permanent damage, and will certainly cause temporary blindness and disorientation. I have never gotten a beam quite that powerful in my eye, but I have gotten a brief (few millisecond) flash from a 25mW DPSS laser and it w
Re:"Not dangerous to anyone"? (Score:5, Funny)
Add a warning:
Caution: Use remaining eye to avoid being eaten by shark.
Re: (Score:1)
Blind cod?
Sightless snapper?
Images of one-eyed marine life bumping together awkwardly.
Just 5mw is dangerous (Score:5, Informative)
Dennis Robertson, M.D., Mayo Clinic ophthalmologist, conducted investigations with a green laser pointer directed to the retina of a patient’s eye; the eye was scheduled for removal because of a malignancy. The green laser damaged the pigment layer of the retina ...
This was a "street legal" 5mw laser pointer. A misplaced 50mw beam will cause damage to your eyes, probably in the form of microspots, because laser light is will focused by your eye's lens. Unfortunately the brain will fill in microspots in the retina until there are too many, or you get too old, then you have vision problems.
The moral: Beware friggin sharks carrying friggin lasers.
Re:Just 5mw is dangerous (Score:5, Funny)
From your link:
Mayo Clinic ophthalmologists have found commercially available Class 3A green laser pointers can cause visible harm to the eye’s retina with exposures as short as 60 seconds
If a shark is staring directly at you for 60 seconds, chances are that some minor eye damage is not really your primary concern.
Re: (Score:2)
A 50mW laser is not class 3A. 5mW is class 3A
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
True. But the shark is more dangerous when the medium is water, so it evens out.
Re: (Score:2)
"This was a "street legal" 5mw laser pointer. A misplaced 50mw beam will cause damage to your eyes"
so it takes 10x as long to hurt yourself with a 5mw?
Re: (Score:1)
"there's actually useful applications" (Score:2)
world's coolest sushi maker?
Been done before (Score:2)
Not new, our early extraterrestrial forebears bred Stethacanthus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stethacanthus_BW.jpg [wikipedia.org]
to support both a forward looking radar mount at the front and a laser turret on their back.
One simple request (Score:2)
Dr. Evil would be so happy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bh7bYNAHXxw [youtube.com]
You mean I have frikin' sharks with frikin' laser beams attached to their heads?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pozlp_wnkRk [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure he is busy working on a new project
Fin / Head? (Score:1)
meh (Score:1)
This is neat. (Score:1)
Scientfic reasons? (Score:2)
...and there's actually useful applications in having a laser attached to the animal.
Publicity and fundraising perhaps. Anyone know real applications? I would RTFA, but I cannot get a response from the subscribe.wired.com server, I have a hard time believing that is slashdotted though.
Faith in humanity restored! (Score:2)
This is the bestest thing in the world all day today.
Mounting (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The difficulty in a removable mount on that part of the shark.
About fricking time! (Score:1)
Because everyone deserves a warm meal. (Score:1)
Now the meme can finally die. (Score:2)
Unless you want a Beowulf cluster of laser sharks.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
... ridden by Natalie Portman in a pool of hot grits!
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you want a Beowulf cluster of laser sharks.
What about "the year of $name on the desktop"? Will $name='laser sharks' come earlier than $name='Linux'?
(ducks)
Bright spot in all of this..... (Score:2)
Now there may be dire consequences to shark-jumping TV shows!
Meh, who am I kidding.....
I read it like this (Score:1)
Tipple told Wired. 'Initially, I told them no. I thought it was a frivolous stunt. But then they offered more money...'
I Got This... (Score:2)
Must be very painful (Score:1)
to cum a TV
Head? (Score:2)
Can someone fill us in on shark anatomy? Does the head really go that far back?
Ultimate Extreme Cat Toy (Score:2)
Errr (Score:2)
Is no one thinking of the childr^H^H^H^H^H^H Sharks??
Can you imagine.. (Score:1)
Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?!
Re: (Score:1)
Bearodactyl!
http://www.theoatmeal.com/comics/ptero [theoatmeal.com]