Dell Designing Developer Oriented Laptop 399
jones_supa writes "Barton George, director of marketing for Dell's Web vertical reveals information about 'Project Sputnik', a laptop tailored for developer needs in web companies. 'We want to find ways to make the developer experience as powerful and simple as possible. And what better way to do that than beginning with a laptop that is both highly mobile and extremely stylish, running the 12.04 LTS release of Ubuntu Linux,' George ponders. He also gives a quick list of packages that the default installation could include. The machine will base on the XPS13, assessing a couple of its main hardware deficiencies along the way."
According to the article, this is a "6 month project to investigate an Ubuntu laptop. If successful, we have big plans for the effort." It's unclear how closely they are working with upstream, but there's mention of Canonical as a commercial partner so this may mean Dell is working to ensure some of their hardware Just Works (tm) with Ubuntu. The software side is so far just a customized install with developer tools preinstalled. Ars remains skeptical about Dell's strategy for GNU/Linux support, which may be warranted given their track record.
Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
The one thing that they (Dell) and pretty much everyone else are missing is a decent screen resolution. 1366x768 and 1440x900 just don't cut it for development. They're barely useable for browsing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Me as well. I just got a "new" laptop, a Latitude e6510, from the Dell Outlet. It has a 15" 1920x1080 screen and I'm very happy indeed. I would have bought a new e6520, but some idiot at Dell decided people want 15" laptops with a numeric keypad, which made it nearly two inches wider than the e6510 with the same screen size.
I think this system would be much more suited to developers than the XPS 13 - it's very rugged and not very heavy, not all THAT much bigger than the XPS, and has a modular bay that yo
Re: (Score:2)
As a developer, I'd prefer 1080x1920 myself.
Re: (Score:2)
Eh? I regularly browse on a 1024x768 netbook without difficulty. Seems to me that the web pages you are browsing don't scale too well.
Re:Resolution (Score:4, Insightful)
There is a huge difference between reading a web page and developing.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure but the claim was: " They're barely useable for browsing".
Re: (Score:2)
I'm of the opinion that the vertical space is quite lacking for browsing.
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
The conspiracy theorist in me would say because they pay for less screen area with the same marketing number. A 15 inch widescreen having less area than a 4:3 style display. More likely is that widescreen LCDs are so much cheaper because they make them for TVs and other media uses.
I don't think the market for 15-17" LCD TVs is that big. So that's not the reason. It's just that most consumers want HD because they naively think that's the gold standard. And HD means widescreen and shitty resolutions. But widescreen doesn't bother me so much for laptops, it's the lack of choice for desktops that pisses me off. High resolution 4:3 monitors are still around, but far fewer than their used to be and they're not cheap.
Re: (Score:2)
The expression "If you call that living..." comes to mind.
Re: (Score:2)
Resolution isn't a problem as any decent browser can seamlessly scale stuff. It's mostly about screen proportions, and you just happen to have the best (barely) available one for about any kind of work other than watching cinema movies. I'd take a 4x3 (or 3x4!) screen of a shitty resolution over something 16x10 or worse.
Certain extensions, and a good deal of programs other than browsers fail to obey size scaling settings, though, so resolution is still nice to have (besides less eyestrain). It's almost a
Re: (Score:3)
I find that
320x200 is
more than
adequate
for all my
modern
internet
purposes!!
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I would like to see a xeon based laptop to be honest. and give me cores, there is no such thing as too many cores when compiling code. i would love to cut my build time from 20 min to 2 min if possible.
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
You'd need that drop in build time, since that's about how long your battery would last.
Re:Resolution (Score:4, Insightful)
Also, most of the other important developer friendly things would be in the hardware, not the software. Many developers are likely to wipe the thing and start over from scratch anyway.
Still, I think the idea of having the computer ship with Linux is important. Even if you want to wipe the computer and start over, the fact that it shipped with Linux means that Dell is truly supporting Linux. That means that they're going to have to choose Linux-friendly hardware, and have stable/optimized drivers for all the hardware they're using.
There are also probably sensible choices that they can make for packages for developers, depending on what kind of developers they're targeting. For example, if you're a serious developer, there's a good chance you're going to want some kind of compiler. Picking a particular set of packages may not make all developers happy, but you could possibly start with a normal set of "lowest common denominator" packages and save the user a little bit of setup time.
Aside from that, the summary mentions that this is targeted for developers for "web companies". If you're talking about "web developers", I could definitely see them selecting a set of packages that an HTML/PHP monkey would be happy with and not want to wipe and start from scratch.
Re: (Score:3)
Really, almost all of those pre-requisites are mitigated with a system with a good dock and a healthy set of peripherals. If I want a portable laptop (not really much a concern for most developers who work in a cube 99% of the time) I'd at least like a dock so that I can easily leave the crap behind. My big MUST in a computer is at least decent dual monitor support and enough RAM / horsepower so that I don't feel bogged down doing day to day work.
Re:Resolution (Score:4, Interesting)
Other than that? Speed? Mostly irrelevant though being quiet would be nice. Mobility? Must not be to big or to heavy to carry around in a normal messenger bag or backpack. Disk size and ram? Standard issue. OS? Whatever suits your fancy and provides the tools for the job. Style? Of course we like to have cool machines, but is it needed - No. Battery life? Somewhat but for serious work one needs a desk anyway.
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Resolution (Score:4, Funny)
Edge case, not worth worrying about ...
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Interesting)
Absolutely true. I cannot believe that Apple is the only company still making a 1200 vertical resolution screen. It's annoying having to spend $2700 on the only decent laptop that still exists.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm pretty sure Dell sells laptops that do 1920x1200 as well, it may not be as a standard feature like Apple, but definitely available as an option.
Anyhow, there must be some way to cobble something together with say, an iPad. iPad runs an app that just turns it into a screen (2048x1536), while the keyboard part has t
Re: (Score:3)
I'm pretty sure Dell sells laptops that do 1920x1200 as well, it may not be as a standard feature like Apple, but definitely available as an option.
This was true, until a few months ago. There were some business only models with 1920x1200 screens. They were not available to personal or SOHO customers. Then they were discontinued, and the highest resolution Dell sells now is 1920x1080, even for business customers.
Re: (Score:3)
Nope, the E6520 tops out at 1080 vertical, just like every other single laptop on the market other than the Macbook Pro. Kind of sad since my very first laptop (a Dell) had 1600x1200 resolution back in 2002.
Re: (Score:3)
Kind of sad since my very first laptop (a Dell) had 1600x1200 resolution
What is sad? A change in aspect ratio? It is a move towards the 16:9 aspect ratio. The end result is greater horizontal resolution, less vertical resolution, and a greater number of pixels overall than your 4:3 ratio 1600x1200 screen.
IT HAS LESS VERTICAL RESOLUTION. 10 years later, less vertical resolution. That's what is sad.
Re: (Score:3)
What is sad? A change in aspect ratio? It is a move towards the 16:9 aspect ratio. The end result is greater horizontal resolution, less vertical resolution, and a greater number of pixels overall than your 4:3 ratio 1600x1200 screen.
What is sad is that 10 years ago the top laptop screen resolution was 2 megapixels and now it's still only 2 megapixels, in a format that's worse for every application except watching video. What's sad is that the 9.7" screen in the new iPad is better than anything you can get in a laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
366x768 and 1440x900 just don't cut it for development.
Sure they do.
If you're on a 13" screen, then pushing much beyond 1440x900 starts to give awfully tiny text at the smallest decently readable font size. Of course I'd jump at the chance of such a panel, but I find 1920x1080 to be comfortable on a 17" laptop, and would probably be OK on a 15" one.
If you're constrained by screen space, get a good quality folding editor and a decent window manager which can switch quickly and efficiently between a lot of vi
Re: (Score:3)
What does resolution have to do with font size?
It affects the smallest legible font size. More resolution equals smaller legible font. For developing, you want as much space as you can use. Once the smallest legible font drops below the minimum readable size, erxtra screen resolution won't give you more screen space. So having super high res panels won't make a machine better for developing.
It will make things smoother and nicer looking, which is why I would like a high res panel, but the difference for dev
Applications that break at DPI over 96 (Score:5, Interesting)
What does resolution have to do with font size?
As the pixel density increases, the font size in physical pixels has to increase proportionally . But a lot of Windows applications (and, I assume, Linux applications) have broken layout if you run them at any DPI other than 96.
The new iPad has a 9" screen at 2048x1536
As with the iPhone 4 compared to the 3GS, the new iPad's screen is exactly twice as dense in each direction as the iPad 2's. This allows the operating system to more easily compensate for DPI-unaware applications. The Windows platform hasn't had such a jump.
Re:Applications that break at DPI over 96 (Score:4, Insightful)
This would be a good moment for some smart guys to start developing a beautiful fully-scalable windowing system for Linux!
It would also be a good moment for Apple to unfuck OSX and go back to resolution independence ala NeXTStep. I have read some rumors about that but nothing concrete.
Re: (Score:3)
This would be a good moment for some smart guys to start developing a beautiful fully-scalable windowing system for Linux!
A windowing system would scale windows - that's not the problem. The problem is scaling things inside those windows. That's the job of a widget toolkit.
And the two most popular widget toolkits for Linux - Gtk and Qt - both fully support resolution independence, and will scale with DPI if desired. Gnome actually enforces this out of the box, if I remember correctly, though of course that requires that it can obtain the real DPI value from the monitor.
Re: (Score:3)
I've been using a 13" Macbook since 2005. I've been using it since 2008 (first release of the iPhoneOS SDK) to do iPhoneOS (now iOS) development. I love larger screens, but I find my Macbook perfectly usable.
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
Agreed! The display is very important. I do not understand why the other commenters seems to be asking for a 1920x1080 display. This wide screen is good for watching movies, but crap for development work. I need more verticle screen real estate so that I can see a larger block of code at once. Verticle space is far more valuable than horizontal. I would gladly take a 1600x1200 display over a 1920x1080. If they really want to be innovative, they'll put a 1920x1200 display on the laptop along with a feature where it can be rotated vertical to give me 1200x1920. That's what I do on my desktop and it works great. Duplicate it on my laptop and I'll finally be able to use it for work purposes.
Re: (Score:3)
When I'm feeling foppish, I turn on syntax highlighting.
It's about keeping the pimp hand strong, man.
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
In particular for development, I personally find the 4:3 screens better than the widescreen ones. And that is one of mine biggest complains with the modern laptops as development goes. I want to see more lines of the source code on the screen. In the end one buys 24" external display - sufficiently tall to fit more lines of code - only to waste 20-30% of the screen space on the sides.
They should introduce something like "tall screen." And if keyboard is OK, I might even consider buying it.
Re: (Score:3)
If you still want an external solution, pick up one of the rotating LCD displays out there that go from landscape to portrait mode to solve this. It would be very interesting to see a laptop with a "portrait" layout, as well (768x1366, for example). The old IBM trackright technology could come in handy to keep keyboard sizes normal.
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't say that's the only thing, but I remember having laptops with better than 900 vertical resolution, and I'd love to see that again.
Aside from that
* Options for both low power (energy) and high power (performance) processors - obviously you won't get either at the same time, but an option for whichever would fit your needs best, would be nice.
* Options for either a simple-low-power-integrated GPU, or a high performance (ATI/nVidia) card. Many developers won't need the latter, many will.
* Space for
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, I can't tell the diference between those resolutions on such a tiny screen (suposing DPI is properly configure so that font size remains constant). I can't really tell if graphics are smoother or not.
The same would not hold true on a >26" screen, but on a 13" screen, I guess most people don't have such a good eyesight.
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
6 years ago HP was able to make the nc8430. It weighted 2.7 kg (6 lbs?) had 2 GB RAM (expandable to 4), 80 GB disk (I replaced it with a 500 GB one two years ago), 1600x1050 15", 2 cores 2 GHz (the T7200), 3 hours battery life for about 1200-1300 Euro. After six years a 4 cores processor (I'm not up to date with the GHz race), 4 GB RAM, 500 GB disk, HD resolution, 3-4 hours of battery life for the same price and a little less weight (not that I care) should be fair.
My biggest complaint with modern laptops is that they have either a tiny screen (reduced height) or they are so large you could mistake them for skateboards if it were not for the number pad at the right end ;-)
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Insightful)
So, buy a Mac Book Pro?
Quad Core i7
500GB HD
4GB RAM
1680x1050 screen
$1850 = 1420EUR
Re:Resolution (Score:5, Informative)
Agreed.
People often give me odd looks when I open my 17" Macbook Pro and boot to Windows, there is a reason it was rated "Best Windows laptop" a few years ago. It is usually high-end, lightweight, with a 1920x1200 display. The manufacturer supports OS X and Windows on it. Last time I looked I did not see a comparable offering from Dell, even at the same price.
My only complaint is that it isn't quite good enough for gaming.
Resolution, resolution, resolution! (Score:4, Interesting)
People often give me odd looks when I open my 17" Macbook Pro and boot to Windows, there is a reason it was rated "Best Windows laptop" a few years ago. It is usually high-end, lightweight, with a 1920x1200 display.
In fact, it's rather hard to find any laptop with a 1920x1200 screen these days. Some years ago, they were not so difficult to find; Apple appears to be one of the few left. Dell, Lenovo, Sony, Acer, Asus, Fujitsu ... none of them have a 1920x1200 laptop offering. One of the few on offer is the HP EliteBook Workstation [ateadirect.com] which actually costs more than the MacBook and has a smaller disk!
The lack of decent resolution screens is the main reason I still have an 8-year-old Sony Vaio VGN-A117S laptop in service. It may only have a 1.7GHz Pentium M, 1GiB of RAM, and Radeon 9600 (sticker says 9700, diagnostics say 9600) but its 17" 1920x1200 screen is a beauty. Since we don't do any gaming, it's quite adequate as a kitchen PC with Xubuntu (email, browsing, music, movies, photos, documents, etc.). I'm not replacing it until I can get more than 1200 vertical pixels on a built-in display - even an iPad 3 type display would do. Pixels matter rather more than inches.
Linux support (Score:2)
They've supported it [dell.com] just fine for a long time. It's their hardware offerings that have been spotty.
6 months to install Linux? (Score:3)
Re:6 months to install Linux? (Score:5, Funny)
6 months to install Linux?
Maybe it's Gentoo.
Year of the linux laptop? (Score:2, Funny)
Could 2012 be the year of the linux laptop? And I might not be completely joking here.
Re:Year of the linux laptop? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
ignoring the troll part, and also with a response to a comment in a parallel thread.
No this won't be linux on the desktop, mostly because the market segment is still too small. (this is targeting devs, thus a small market).
Someone else said anything but Ubuntu, and I disagree.
I think if Dell goes through with this , it is a good thing. A notebook with all know Linux compatible HW (with working sound even?) would be great. Doesn't matter what distro you put on there, at least the HW is not going to give yo
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't want to sound like a shill but every time I see people complaining about laptop monitor glossiness and resolution I feel the urge to recommend a Thinkpad.
Probably not quite as solid as in the IBM days but still pretty good. (at least the T and W models)
Shovelware (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm worried about the shovelware. Will ten antiviruses and junk like that be in a removable ubuntu package or will it be too deeply embedded into the OS to remove?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think you understand Linux.
No antivirus.
Everything is configurable.
Not like Windows and Mac at all.
Re: (Score:3)
Dell is not that stupid.
If they tried this tactic, the project would fail with developers (their target audience) or developers would just wipe the machine and install real Linux, not your hypothetical bastardized Linux.
No developer would stand for a "Tivoized" Linux.
Corporate Reverse Engineering (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe Dell can succeed where legions of open-source developers have failed: to twist the arm of hardware developers to release the source of their drivers so we can FINALLY use our computers with Linux without ages of pointless driver and configuration file tweaking!
Re: (Score:2)
Why is this downvoted? It's pretty insightful, if dell starts shipping Ubuntu with success, we might start getting documentation or open source drivers for hardware that is currently supported with reverse engineering in the long run!
They dropped it from their website? (Score:4, Interesting)
http://www.dell.com/ca/business/p/laptops?~ck=mn#!facets=16260~0~195640&p=1 [dell.com]
Could have surprised me. My laptop is the predecessor to that model, the Vostro V130n, which came with Ubuntu LTS installed on it. They're still selling them, you just have to look for it. The V130n features a Celeron U3600, 2GB of RAM, 13.3" screen (1366x768), and came originally with a 250GB hard drive. The battery life isn't that great (about 2.5h with the factory configuration), but that's because the battery is very small (slightly less than the volume of a CD jewel case). I was able to increase the battery life to 4h by swapping the hard drive with an Intel 320-series SSD. 3.2lbs with the stock configuration, and slightly lighter than that with the hard drive swapped. Total cost (including the hard drive replacement) was under $500. If they can price this ultraportable under $1000 like they're doing with the XPS 13, I would seriously consider it when it comes time to replace my current laptop. (though that'll probably be a few years, it's plenty powerful enough for everything I throw at it).
It's nice that they're doing this, and more power to them, but it's misleading to claim that they aren't supporting Linux, when you can, today, buy a reasonably nice system with Ubuntu preinstalled on it.
Probably just as much market positioning (Score:5, Insightful)
The software side is so far just a customized install with developer tools preinstalled. Ars remains skeptical about Dell's strategy for GNU/Linux support, which may be warranted given their track record.
Call it a "developer laptop" and you've probably scared away 99% of the market, the 99% Dell doesn't want. The ones who think it'll be like Windows or run Windows software or work with all accessories they have on their old PC. The people interested in Linux will know hey it's just an Ubuntu install with a few preloads, the important thing is the hardware is supported under Linux. To me it sounds good, to make it profitable it's just as much about not selling to the wrong people as selling to the right people. Support and returns will very quickly kill your margins.
Re: (Score:2)
well, maybe they should call it a 'professional' laptop and sell it to businesses - like the majority of their sales.
if it comes installed with everything you'd want, I doubt anyone would wipe it and start over, there comes a point where you just don't want to play with these things, you want to get work done. If they get a Linux install working (and that really means sorting all the driver issues like power management, and all the cheapest components Dell has a tendency to put in there from version to ver
Sounds cool, but (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
This is not a flame, but the phrase is "piques my interest". I don't disagree with the rest of your post.
Please don't mod this FUNNY (Score:5, Funny)
Keyboard must be easy to clean and resist spills. Test against Cheetos and Mountain Dew.
Re: (Score:3)
Why did I know that was going to happen... sigh.
The metrosexual web designer cliche' (Score:5, Insightful)
I find significant dissonance with their two statements:
"ways to make the developer experience as powerful and simple as possible" and
"what better way to do that than beginning with a laptop that is both highly mobile and extremely stylish"
I was unaware that web designers did most of their work "in the field" away from modern conveniences like desks and dual monitors. I am also surprised that "stylish" is equated with "powerful and simple".
By the look of their press release, I'd say they are trying to convert all of the metrosexual Apple users to Dell brand users with shiny and an OSX-esque GUI. Function and capability don't appear to play into the equation much.
Re: (Score:2)
By the look of their press release, I'd say they are trying to convert all of the metrosexual Apple users to Dell brand users with shiny and an OSX-esque GUI. Function and capability don't appear to play into the equation much.
Bingo.
Re: (Score:2)
But ... But it's going to be stylish!
I'd just be happy if the laptop didn't need a power converter that's bigger than a hardback novel. Seriously Dell it's getting out of hand,
developers! developers! developers. (Score:3, Funny)
developers. developers. developers. (developers developers developers)
Re: (Score:3)
Bring back 4x3 screen ratio: more vertical screen (Score:5, Insightful)
As a developer, I need more vertical screen space: looking at code, looking at debuggers, editing long files.
I have two monitors at work: an ld 19" and 23". The 23" has less vertical screen space than the 19".
More vetical screen real estate would make a laptop more dev friendly
Re: (Score:2)
Turn it to the side...
Kidding of course, hard to do it with a laptop anyways, but while I was working on a long report recently I decided to rotate my 19" monitor and it was great.
My laptop has a 12" 4x3 screen and I find it much better than the 13-14" wide screen ones.
Re: (Score:3)
16x10 is the best resolution, especially now the docks of your window managers are finding their way to the side (where they used to be, decades ago).
Ubuntu as a development platform. (Score:2, Interesting)
Well, I'm glad to hear they are at least waiting 6 months before putting anything into the market. It'll take that time for any and all bugs pertaining to Ubuntu 12.04 to be cleared up, I'm sure.
I want to say Ubuntu would be a terrible platform for development, but I've found that despite its rapidly changing environment its often been the easiest to configure solely from the repositories. I'd be interested if they don't preinstall tons of unnecessary crap and the drivers it comes with are solid.
6 Months... (Score:2)
Is not long enough. We use our laptops for 3 (or more) years. Every 3 (2 if I beg) I can have a new one.
I expect that I can have one of these in 2 years (having just gone through a replacement). Been pushing for an Apple laptop, anyway...
It's not the software, it's the hardware (Score:5, Insightful)
Do that and I buy one.
Know your customers (Score:4, Funny)
We want to find ways to make the developer experience as powerful and simple as possible [...] extremely stylish
Failed, right out of the gate.
Re: (Score:3)
Why? Style and function need not be mutually exclusive, and the prevailing "wisdom" on /. of late to equate anything that aims to have style as some insignificant toy that automatically means function is compromised is really missing the point.
Can't a developer aspire to both, or must you relegate them to always having an ugly, clunky machine that is unpleasant to look at and work on?
Keyboard and screen (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
A developer oriented laptop with a user-friendly O (Score:2)
Really, why does having a user-friendly OS make a laptop developer-friendly?
I think both things are generally mutually exclusive.
No VGA out, no dock, no multi-head support (Score:2)
I almost purchased an XPS a couple months ago but wanted to run multiple monitors. Dell said they don't have a docking station for it so all you get is HDMI. Yeah.... no. I opted instead to build a micro-atx system. Not as portable but I've got dual heads, tons of ram, SSD, 8 cores, 4 VGA Outs, and a water cooled CPU. All for about the same price. If Dell would have offered dual head support through a docking station I probably would have been sold but kind of glad they don't now.
Dell has supported Linux for over a Decade (Score:2)
Dell has been supporting Linux on servers for well over 10 years. You've always been free to install Linux on your laptop- just don't expect to get (consumer level/any) support.
The hardware cost is just a fraction of what you pay. In a previous life, when I worked at a little company in Round Rock, TX that rhymes with hell, testing took up the vast majority of development effort, and every additional OS added to that test effort/cost. If/when the analysis says it can make a profit that is similar to the ot
Sorry to break the bad news (Score:2)
...but a developer machine is a desktop.
External keyboard, individual to the devs taste of ergonomical. Two monitors, one for IDE/debugger, one for running/reference lookup.
Preloading any developper tools is pointless, as you will need the ones in use in your company.
Emperor Linux (Score:2)
Widescreen IPS display (Score:2)
Widescreen IPS display with at least 1200 pixel vertical resolution or it didn't happen...
And Windows devs can go suck eggs. (Score:2)
That appears to be the underlying message, but wait, what's that on Monster.com? Aren't most well paying developer jobs for, dare I say it, "Windows?"
FYI, I made my Window laptop adequate for development. I put in 16GB of DDR3 RAM and run two or three dedicated virtual machines to which I can quickly switch via the magic of "Alt-TAB." It's reasonably fast and the VMs act as different desktops. The new laptop and memory came in under $600.
Thanks Dell, but I'll keep my HP.
For those of you flaming the style comment (Score:2)
Is that marketing hype, an actual "must look like an Apple clone" requirement, or just to make it more appealing to developers in appearance. Personally, I'd love to have an Alienware m18 largely for it's looks (and performance). Stylish doesn't mean we're going to get commercials with graphics designers and bike messengers talking about how much they dig Sputnik and what it does for their hip lifestyles.
One thing missing (Score:4, Insightful)
Yeah, every web developer runs Ubuntu up until that moment when they realise they have to make sure the site works with Internet Explorer. So the first thing you'll have to do with this is install Virtual Box and do a Windows Install. You do have a Windows license, right?
Re: (Score:3)
Indeed. Orient is a noun, orientate is a verb. This is why, among other things, there are orientation sessions but never oriention sessions.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Language (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why Ubuntu? (Score:5, Insightful)
Visual Studio vs VIM is like an aircraft carrier vs the world's greatest compound bow. I'll grant you, it is the best goddamned bow the world has ever seen. A good bowman can take shots a sniper would be hard-pressed to make, and there is a simple joy to using such a powerful and versatile tool. And if you want, you can call it the rustiest piece of shit aircraft carrier that's ever wallowed the seas. But come on. Be real. They're hardly even the same thing.
Re: (Score:2)
GVIM runs natively on Windows, and it does so fantastically. If you're ever stuck on Windows I highly recommend it.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about you, but I like using a laptop and plugging into an external monitor when I need it.
Re:Laugh (Score:5, Insightful)
Developing on a 13 inch screen...
Developing on dual 30" screens is certainly nicer, but it you can't develop on a 13" screen, then you're not terribly effective. I developed good software on a netbook (1024x600), since I was travelling a lot and I valued the light weight (940g for a 20G EEE 900, with the lightest PSU I've ever used) and decent battery life over a big screen.
Once you're all set up with a decent folding editor and plenty of virtual screens, it's a surprisingly good environment.
And don't forget that unless you're flogging the CPU, the backlight is the biggest power draw, which scales with the square of the diagonal length. You simply cannot have a lightweight large screen laptop with a long battery life.
Remember, no matter how awesomely huge your screen space is, development is a bit of a drag if you have to write the code on paper when the battery runs out.
Re: (Score:3)
It's not a matter of being able to. Development can be done on a 9" netbook screen; I've done it. However, I would never choose to do such a thing if I had an alternative.
Re: (Score:3)
Using Unity...
Re: (Score:2)
debian is too much outdated for a brand new laptop, and for the other distros : .rpm? are we stuck in the 90s?
Re: (Score:3)
kubuntu-desktop is always just an apt-get away. Or xubuntu-desktop. Or lubuntu-desktop.
That's the forgotten joy of Ubuntu- even compared with other Linux distros, window managers are fantastically easy. There are so many pre-built ones for the distro which you can guarantee will play nice with all the other default software. It's one of those little benefits which Unity has really managed to focus in my mind...
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, what? What is this about?
I have an XPS with USB3 ports. I thought they worked OK. I recently got a USB3 disk enclosure and had problems formatting a drive. Ended up doing it in Linux on another machine and put it down to Windows.
I also plugged in someone's stupid USB cigarette (to charge it) and I think it 'blew' my USB port. I keep getting these 'power surge' alerts in Win7 ever since. I am planning on restoring windows soon and then running it through the warranty process.
From what you said, it soun