Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Advertising Businesses Social Networks The Almighty Buck

Facebook Tests 'Want' Button To Hoard User Data, Save Its Stock Price 98

colinneagle writes with news that Facebook is beginning to roll out tests of "want" and "collect" buttons in an attempt to bring users and retailers closer together. "The company is working with Victoria's Secret, Pottery Barn, Michael Kors, Wayfair, Neiman Marcus, Fab.com and Smith Optics. The difference between 'liking' and 'wanting' would be like discovering the holy grail of datamining. Inside Facebook said that although the 'Want' button is different than the Want plugin that developer Tom Waddington noticed in June, the company may eventually offer it as a plugin. Unsurprisingly, Facebook wants to keep people on the site as opposed to leaving to visit Pinterest. Collections will offer retailers a Pinterest-like option to engage buyers, offer users a way to collect images, while also collecting even more data about users. For example, Facebook asks, 'Why are you collecting this?' Regardless of a user's answer, the wants and collects will surely be used to deliver targeted ads. Eventually, the Collections feature could help Facebook generate more revenue."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook Tests 'Want' Button To Hoard User Data, Save Its Stock Price

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Yay! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by bored ( 40072 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @08:16PM (#41602749)

    Clear your cookies and try from a different IP or browser. Google definitely appears to be doing "guilty by association" type functions where people sharing IP's get similar results.

  • by Nerdfest ( 867930 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @08:29PM (#41602841)

    I don't mind trading some personal information for some services, but I don't see how helping FaceBook out on this by telling them what I want to buy helps me. If they can give me discounts, then perhaps, but I don't see that mentioned.

  • by game kid ( 805301 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @08:29PM (#41602847) Homepage

    Save its stock price? Nah, I'm pretty sure that machinery served its purpose. Now Zuckerberg just needs to sell it off to Dewey Cheatam & Howe Capital LP, reap that private equity money from the middle- and lower-tier firings, and enjoy his *clears throat* well-earned retirement.

    This Want stuff is just to wring out a few remaining Dumb Fucks(tm), that their data may fund the Not-Yet-Fired for a little while more.

  • A strange game... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Gothmolly ( 148874 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @08:46PM (#41602975)

    The only winning move is not to play.

    Is Facebook relevant anymore? It is starting to have that Myspace-like stink about it.

  • by gweihir ( 88907 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @09:27PM (#41603211)

    Indeed. How the Facebook IPO was different from a somewhat camouflaged and utterly immoral Ponzi-scheme escapes me.

    I think impounding of all ill-gotten gains and life in prison would be the right appreciation for it.

  • by gweihir ( 88907 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @09:34PM (#41603273)

    It never was relevant. Zuckerberg and accomplices inflated it with what was basically a modified Ponzi-scheme until they could cash in big.

    It serves one purposes though: Separate the stupid and the gullible (with FarceBook account in actual use or, worse, stocks) and the smarter ones. Yes, not playing is the right move.

  • Re:FUCK YOU (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Baloroth ( 2370816 ) on Tuesday October 09, 2012 @10:18PM (#41603529)

    They never will, it'd cause way to much embarrassment. Oh, that company page you put up has 2 million dislikes? Oops, looks like a Facebook page was a bad idea. Yeah no, Facebook wouldn't do that to their bottom line. Interesting as it would be to see if you could "Dislike" Facebook itself...

  • by Sqr(twg) ( 2126054 ) on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @02:06AM (#41604691)

    You didn't get paid to write that, and you did it anyway, just because you like to tell other people what you think.

    While /. comments are for people who like to tell others their opinions about nerd stuff, facebook posts are for people who like to tell others what they like, or what they had for breakfast. It's not that different really.

    I think the "want" buton might work well with fb's target demographic, but I'd still not buy any of their stock until it has dropped at least another 99.7 %.

  • by gweihir ( 88907 ) on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @02:51AM (#41604889)

    It never was relevant

    Maybe not to you, but this is a blatantly stupid statement. It has a massive user base, of addicted people.

    So does heroin. Is that relevant to you?

    My point exactly.

  • by JaredOfEuropa ( 526365 ) on Wednesday October 10, 2012 @03:32AM (#41604987) Journal
    Never. They will not show you exactly what you want, but will make (hopefully increasingly better) guesses at what stuff you don't know about but might want. You "want"ed an iPhone? It won't show you more iPhones, but might show you accessories for it, or perhaps an ad for an Android phone trying to convince you that this is the better choice.

The nation that controls magnetism controls the universe. -- Chester Gould/Dick Tracy

Working...