Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Android Handhelds

NC School District Recalls Its Amplify Tablets After 10% Break In Under a Month 177

Nate the greatest writes "Guilford County Schools' headline grabbing tablet program is back in the news again. The program came to an abrupt end last Friday when the school district announced that they were recalling all of the Amplify tablets. GCS had leased over 15 thousand of the tablets (at a cost of $200 a year) for its middle school students, but decided to recall the tablets just one month into the school year after some 1500 students reported a broken screen. Around two thousand complained of improperly fitting cases, and there were also 175 reports of malfunctioning power supplies. There's currently no explanation for the cases or power supplies, but GCS has stated that the tablets broke because they lacked a layer of Gorilla Glass. This was listed in the contract, but the school district did not confirm the condition of the tablets before accepting them. This program was the poster child for News Corp.'s entry into the educational market. It was the single largest program to use the Amplify tablet, and its failure represents a serious setback. The Amplify tablet now has a record for poor construction quality and a breakage rate that is 12 times higher than what Squaretrade reported in early 2012 for the iPad 2."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NC School District Recalls Its Amplify Tablets After 10% Break In Under a Month

Comments Filter:
  • Contract (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Threni ( 635302 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:20PM (#45075399)

    "listed in the contract, but the school district did not confirm the condition of the tablets before accepting them"

    But they were listed in the contract. Presumably the school didn't check the CPU either. So what?

  • Re:Obvious Solution (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ackthpt ( 218170 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:21PM (#45075413) Homepage Journal

    Don't give them tablets.

    Tell me about it. Some of these smartphone screens break at nearly the drop of a hat. Anything you're going to give to kids should be nearly indestructible, perfect testing for anything which could in the future be called Mil Spec.

  • by girlintraining ( 1395911 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:25PM (#45075457)

    go with the lowest bidder. If you're going to make notebooks for school, make them so they can withstand those things found in schools -- students.

    Umm, these are tablets not notebooks. From my experience with my little sister, teenagers do not treat their electronics very well -- Gorilla glass wouldn't help much. All the glass does is keep the display from being scratched. It won't help if you drop the device, or if it is subjected to tortion stress (twisted). Both of these will deform the case, and in turn the LCD. It doesn't take much to destroy an LCD. Sitting on it. Dropping it onto a hardwood or concrete floor. The list goes on. And teenagers don't just kill the devices through these simple physical forces...

    My sister routinely drags her iPad into the bathroom to listen to music while she takes a shower. I die a little inside thinking of all that humidity corroding the insides. And I can't tell you how many times she's yanked the power adapter out by the cord, or grabbed it, and forgetting it was still plugged in, tore the adapter right out of the wall socket. Without inspecting one of these Amplify tablets, I don't know if this is the case, but with ipads the connector has a spring to hold it in place -- which means the cord and the connector in the device gets bent and mangled after doing this a few times. I've replaced the power adapter for her about 5 times now. She hasn't even had it two years. Her current one is held together with electrical tape and numerous warnings that this will be the last one. She still comes to me every few weeks after it shorts out and dies from the latest careless act.

    But god help you if you tell slashdot this [slashdot.org]. It's a hanging offense to state the obvious around here... :/

  • by chill ( 34294 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:27PM (#45075489) Journal

    Half-a-dozen years ago when my daughter was in high school, the district piloted a "laptop progam" where all the books and assignments were done electronically. They had some deal with Microsoft and Dell with "deals" on MS Office Student and some Dell laptops.

    I threw a fit and insisted we would NOT be purchasing the "required" laptops and would provide one for our daughter. The school relented because I made such a pain of myself.

    Off to E-Bay I went and purchased an older, used Panasonic Toughbook. Not the latest, but ran all the software and rugged enough to stop small caliber weapons fire.

    The breakage rate of those cheap, plastic Dell laptops was horrific. High schoolers casually tossed them on desks or in their locker or bookbags, resulting in over 90% of them getting returned for repair by the end of the year.

    We ended up selling the Toughbook to a student entering the program in the next year. It had held up fine.

    Computers given to students need to be mil-spec ruggedized if you want them to remain usable for any period of time.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:28PM (#45075499)

    This comes as no surprise to those of us that work for public schools (including me, staying safely anonymous). What is a surprise is the lack of negative news for iPad roll-outs. The latest one in my county was to a tiny public school in the country of 500 students. They were given iPads a week before school started. On opening day there was a dozen broken sent in plastic bags to my office with a 'Pls repair ASAP! Thx' post-it note applied. After a month the pile had risen to 50. We expect to go into Christmas break with over a hundred broken.

    Of course we will not be canceling the program. The way that the Apple contracts are set up with the administration means that the parents have to reimburse the school district $1000 for a totaled device, $400 for a screen, and $100 for anything else. No opt out, as our textbooks are all digital now. It is considered a self-funding project, IT costs included.

    I apologize for the rant. It is just this tablet craze is more of a detriment, nomatter the manufacturer.

  • by ideonexus ( 1257332 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:29PM (#45075501) Homepage Journal

    Unfortunately, this mirrors my own experience [ideonexus.com] when I bought all the kids on my street laptops on the condition that they spend weeks with me learning how to handle and respect them. One year later, every single laptop was inoperable. Of course, every one of these kids owned an iPod touch... with a broken screen, so there were warning signs.

    I think the problem is the portability of these devices. The reason I didn't break my Commodore 64 when I was a kid is because it sat on a desk. If it was portable, I probably would have shattered or lost it at some point too. I don't think we can make these devices rugged enough to survive your average teenager.

  • by Tifer ( 2644417 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:41PM (#45075613)
    Well, a high school student in Guilford County, I thought this program would fail from the very beginning. I go to a private school that issues laptops to students starting in 6th grade (except WE buy them and own them individually, not, say, the state) and continuing through 12th grade. Students at my school break their laptops all the time--screens crack, keys pop out, power cords explode, etc. Most damages are covered by the laptops' warranties. We took classes for a year on properly maintaining electronics and we STILL end up with cases of powderized hard drives every year. It was hard for me to believe that MY state would pay such huge sums of money for thousands of dubiously-effective devices that are known to shatter when dropped. There's no way not to sound like a snob saying this, but I can't see many public school students being particularly careful with these tablets. The students at my school took classes in handling our laptops, paid for them with our own money, and STILL pay out the ass fixing the things every year because so many of them do not respect computers. I haven't read the literature on tablets in education, but I didn't think this was a cost-effective program and I predicted that 50% of the tablets would be MIA or KIA by the end of the first school year. I'm glad I won't get to a chance to prove myself right, but it's a shame that nobody at any point in the process of rolling out these tablets questioned the feasibility of it all.
  • Re:WTF? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by AK Marc ( 707885 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @07:04PM (#45076367)
    Schools don't have money, school districts have money. The per-student in-class spending on students is very low in the US, but the per-student education "costs" in the US are among the highest in the world. We pay administrators, management, testing organizations, textbook deals, and all that at premium prices, but teacher pay and conditions aren't that good.

    So this is logical (even if horribly broken). The district bought them, not the schools, even if they "gave" them to only one school as a pilot. At my school (a public school that has been on the list of the best in the country), the teachers volunteered for most after school activities. Only sports were sponsored. So academic contests were often held under the banner of UIL, the same organization that handles sports in Texas. So the math contests were "sports" on paper. And yes, I got a High School Letter in "sports" because of my participation in math (and other) contests.
  • by AK Marc ( 707885 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @07:25PM (#45076503)
    The weight of books is an issue. About 10% of the students in my school had weight-related issues diagnosed (scoliosis in girls was common). I didn't find out until later that wearing a backpack one-strapped would lead to deformity (I had a doctor raise it as an issue when I broke a shoulder in a sporting accident). I couldn't be "fixed" because I was asymmetrical to begin with. When my kids get to school age, that's a fight I'm willing to fight. They shouldn't be forced to carry 20% of their body weight around on their backs regularly. An electronic device makes much more sense.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @07:50PM (#45076713)

    It should be illegal for a school to do anything like that. Patents shouldn't have to pay for the bad decisions of school boards and administrators. I propose passing a law requiring school boards and administrators to reimburse and pay for any such fees that impact more than x % of students out of there own pockets. x would require some research, but 6% sounds like a good target.

  • Re:Obvious Solution (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Greyfox ( 87712 ) on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @08:43PM (#45077033) Homepage Journal
    Or at least the drop of a smartphone. Which is odd because pretty much everyone I know but me has cracks in their smartphone screens. I drop mine a couple times a week AND take it skydiving and it remains unbroken. So how the hell are people managing to break their smartphone screens so often?
  • by cusco ( 717999 ) <brian.bixby@gmail . c om> on Wednesday October 09, 2013 @09:17AM (#45080887)

    Toughbook salesman came to the place I used to work, was told, "No, we don't need your expensive laptops, we have a contract with Compaq already." He asked to borrow one of their bucket trucks, and amazingly they agreed. He went about 20 feet up and tossed the Toughbook out. It bounced around a bit, and started right up when he turned it on. Then he closed it, laid it on the ground and told the bucket truck driver to run over it. He did, and when they opened it up it was still running. They bought a bunch of them. Amazing salesman.

Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.

Working...