Video Watch Videos in Synch with Fellow iOS Users (Video) 71
Video no longer available.
This video is about Dr. Saeed Darvish-Kazem and Dr. Michael Pazaratz, two MDs from Canada, who came up with a free iOS app called WeMesh that lets you share video content with iOS-owning friends in real time. You see the video and so does your friend. more or less simultaneously. Cat videos and 90s music are two categories the doctors say are especially popular on WeMesh, which only works with YouTube at the moment, a shortcoming they hope to change in the near future. NOTE: If you're on the Slashdot main page and click the 'Read' link below this paragraph, the video will autoplay.
Solution looking for a problem? (Score:2)
So, what is this for?
Re: (Score:3)
Google hangouts has a youtube option that syncs youtube across the hangout.
Re: (Score:2)
This wasn't exactly difficult, and it was completely platform independent.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It would be useful if you are driving with two kids in the back seat watching the same movie.
Re: (Score:2)
YouTube has this. Samsung had this on their phones too.
Nothing new here.
Re:autoplay?!? (Score:5, Insightful)
NOTE: If you're on the Slashdot main page and click the 'Read' link below this paragraph, the video will autoplay.
Why? Slashdot is already having multiple daily outages. When users are allready cheesed off, autoplayiing a video is not a smart move.
Dice (Score:2)
I was looking hard for a Dice link, but couldn't find it. What's up with that? There's got to be a Dice angle, right?
Re: IMHO, I doubt it. (Score:3)
I have explained more than once to more than one Slashdotmedia management person that autoplay videos were the work of the devil. The leader of the autoplay cabal (obviously) disagrees.
Ever single person who works directly on Slashdot has an opinion about autoplay videos that is somewhere between dislike and raw hatred. One editor sent a 1665 word plea to kill autoplay videos up the chain of command, and yesterday I growled like an angry dog at the boss person who oversees Slashdot. The guy has always seeme
Re: (Score:2)
They misspelled 'ought to play'. Evidently, there is no support for HTML5 video yet.
Re: (Score:2)
what browser do you use?
Iceweasel 24.8.1 (Firefox on Debian). No Flash, but it works fine with YouTube and all the porn sites that support HTML5.
Why do you turn on autoplay? (Score:5, Informative)
Thanks for the warning, you will see the drastic reduction in hits for such links from Chrome. You will create a policy of not linking to any site that has auto play video. Also why do you include it directly in read? Can't you just put up a link and say click to play?
Re: (Score:2)
That alone is going drive users away from Chrome to Firefox+NoScript.
FYI, this is a good thing [imgur.com]...
ORANGE MOUND (Score:1)
ORANGE MOUND MOTHAFUCKA
Re: (Score:2)
Flashblock in firefox has the option to block HTML5 video, too. And you've just reminded me to turn it on.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean Chrome, the web browser written by the world's biggest online advertising firm, makes it difficult to avoid annoying advertisements? That doesn't sound right at all.
Re: (Score:2)
I just manually added "ooyala.com" to the adblock plus filters in chrome. That was the first time i saw the auto play video a couple weeks ago. Have not scene any auto play videos sense.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We need HTML5 video blockers like for Flash, Silverlight, etc. :P
Flashblock (Score:2)
If you're on the Slashdot main page and click the 'Read' link below this paragraph, the video will autoplay.
This is exactly why I use Flashblock.
Re: (Score:2)
Adding "ooyala.com" to adblock plus filters prevent the video from even showing up.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you kidding me? (Score:1)
AUTOPLAY? REALLY!?
Come on now, that is a huge pain in the ass! I thought we all agreed to that! You couldn't have been bothered to remove it? For that matter, the article itself has a severe spelling and grammar flaw. That reeks of laziness! REEKS , I tell you. How completely and utterly disappointing.
This could be very useful (Score:2)
I won't be quick to dismiss this. One of the downsides of watching internet videos is that you lose out on some of the shared viewing experience. Meanwhile the shared communication experience (voice, Twitter, whatever) is nearing full strength. It would make sense to take advantage of that. There's value in seeing things at once, as a group.
Another example is with online-only shows like House of Cards. It's an excellent show and binge watching is great. But I think Netflix may be missing out on a lot of wor
Re: (Score:2)
I won't be quick to dismiss this. One of the downsides of watching internet videos is that you lose out on some of the shared viewing experience. .
This is the biggest benefit of the internet. The hive mind can all browse and search various content on their own and in their own time, only passing on worthy material to others in the group, thus increasing the quality of overall consumed content exponentially. This product is like trying to herd cats. It'll take you a week to find a free slot in everyone's calender only to find the video is shit and you have to start all over again. And don't even think about if one person gets interrupted, can you group
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of great internet stuff requires "being there". Live chats. Live events. Game streaming. It's nothing new and in the right circumstance it works.
The weakest part of YouTube has got to be the comments. They are silent, and they are usually stupid or old or both. Now imagine joining a voice chat (or even text) channel with others sharing a common interest, watching something simulcasted and talking about it in real time, with a person or a mechanism designated to queue up videos. That has possibilities.
Re: (Score:2)
Facebook has already solved this problem. You watch something interesting, share with your friends, make comments, they watch when it suits them, they comment, win win. (Note: I fucking hate facebook but the sharing videos among your friends is already done. Havi
These guys never had a long-distance relationship? (Score:2)
I'm guessing maybe not even a short distance relationship.
I dated a woman in another city and can remember spending hours on the phone with her and occasionally even watching a TV program with her all while on the phone (and this was 25+ years ago when long distance actually cost money).
For what it's worth, it might be kind of fun to have this kind of real-time social component with Netflix streamed movies, either with people you knew or with other people who liked the same shows or movies.
What I want sync'd is (Score:2)
What happens ... (Score:2)
Sausage Party (Score:2)
I'm willing to bet a significant percentage of the videos shared with this new app will include penises.
Cool (Score:2)
Wow a multicast (Score:1)
Syncplay (Score:1)