
U.K. Pirate Broadcasters Steal Car Radio Listeners 261
Ant sent it: A BBC News story about how illegal stations in the U.K. are exploiting the new Radio Data System (RDS) standard that is now used in Europe and South Africa, and is coming soon to Australia, China and the US, by using RDS signals to force nearby motorists's car radios to tune automatically to their stations instead of legitimate ones.
Is this already happening in the US? (Score:4)
--Shoeboy
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:2)
Who are the pirates? (Score:1)
The article seems to be implying that normal radio stations are doing this to get listeners. Of course, that doesn't seem likely. What would pirates want to broadcast anyhow?
Somehow I want one of those.... (Score:2)
These people are wrong. (Score:1)
I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner (Score:4)
For those of you unfamiliar with RDS it is a feature built into most european car radios that allow additional data to be broadcast along with the audio. Most stations broadcast the stations name so if for example you were listening to Metro FM the display would say that rather than it's frequency. It also can transmit other data such as the type of music the station plays and alternate frequencies for the station so if it goes to a weak signal it can try for a better signal as well as the frequencies for related neighbouring stations. It can also interrupt tape or CS's when a traffic announcement is broadcast.
More details, please (Score:2)
Are there any laws specifically regarding the abuse of the RDS system (as opposed to just plain unauthorized transmissions)?
I can see the benefits for civil defense, but the abuse potential is staggering.
Sounds like a pretty good hack... (Score:3)
I more (or less, depending on your point of view) beneign prank would be a "War of the Worlds" style broadcast...
"We interupt this broadcast to bring you a live broadcast from our new alien overlords..."
(c:
Hmmm... (Score:2)
As soon as its adopted in the US... (Score:1)
Much better listening then the prefab, spoon fed crap that consistantly spews out of the "legit" choices...
OB - What is it with the quality of radio nowadays? I heard the word f**k 3 times on my way to work, pity when I can't even listen to morning radio with my kids in the car...Not that I would listen to the pirate stations when my kids were in the car, due to the above, we just enjoy happy disny tunes or *gasp* have "conversations"
(conversation: to converse, to exchange packets in meatspace)
Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime (Score:1)
I can't help but believe that even though there is a legitimate reason to go after these "pirate" radio stations (their broadcast is in effect, a false claim to being a local traffic report) that the reason that will be put forward for arresting them will be "You hacked our proprietary format" or "You need to be licensed to broadcast radio signals" (at least the licensing one is probably a real law.)
O well...
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:1)
Teletext is another example, it's very difficult to buy a TV in Europe that doesn't have Teletext but in the US it's unheard of.
Ha, Ha, Ha! (Score:2)
Clarification please? (Score:1)
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:1)
cable modem/DSL subscribers are there
in Europe vs. the US for example?
how do you suppose they'll beat it? (Score:1)
Way Too Cool (Score:2)
Re:More details, please (Score:2)
For those of who in the US: RDS not only displays traffic and other information, it also has automatic switch-over to stronger frequencies that carry the same radio station. In Europe, country wide radio stations very popular and the automatic switch over is really helpful when driving distances longer than, say 40 miles.
I assume that the pirates somehow transmit a second signal that overlaps with the frequency of a national radio which causes the redirect. As far as I know, doing this would result in quick reaction to search and shutdown the pirate, though.
Re:Clarification please? (Score:3)
You can choose what exactly you want it to do, you may want to turn the traffic announcements off and the auto retuning off but may want to keep the station's name rather than the frequency displayed.
Re:Who are the pirates? (Score:1)
Views on current events, breaking stories on their enemies, neighbors, local politicians. :)
Basically they would/could broadcast anything you'd care to put a web page up about.
But there can't be many thing like that can there?
Just another AC who hasn't bothered choosing a nick yet....
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:1)
Unfortunately, I couldn't hold out for it. The reason I was getting a new car was because the old one was rear ended and written off. I couldn't wait the 6-8 weeks for the car I wanted to ship from the factory.
BTW this is in BC Canada.
Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime (Score:2)
Re:Who are the pirates? (Score:1)
Re:It's not limited to car radios. (Score:1)
It's particularly useful when you're living away from whereever you normally live. I went down London and without RDS it would have took ages to work out what station was what.
Re:As soon as its adopted in the US... (Score:1)
Why this might be usefull (Score:2)
Mostly things like "A Tornado has been spoted at place X if you are near there get to cover NOW!" ofcourse this is just a more fancy version of the EBS system.
Just hilarous. (Score:4)
Step 2: Include no authentication, "ignore traffic broadcasts" buttons, or common sense auto-ignore if > N requests per time slot are made.
Step 3: Go after "evil radio pirates" who are abusing your "security, what security?" technology.
Yes, Viriginia, there are stupid beurocrats.
---
Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner (Score:1)
If this is true (and I don't know if it is, IANARSNDIPOOTOR [i am not a radio specialist, nor do i play one on tv or radio]) all you would need to do is transmit just the station chaning data on the same freq. as the beeb or sky radio or something.
But from what I understood from the article, RDS includes an option to change to the station transmiting a traffic report.
Anyway... time to get that old transmiter out of the basement. =)
Re:Who are the pirates? (Score:1)
Re:Is this already happening in the US? (Score:2)
---
That would be funny... (Score:4)
I woke up to my clock radio today and the DJ's were talking about some list of the top 100 songs this century and complaining about some of the selections of artists in various places, but that same radio station would not deviate from their play list if you beat them with a fucking stick (I know, I've tried.) Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. At least there's one radio station around here that has some semblance of personality. Unfortunately even on that one there's no escape from the Old Navy ads.
Re:Clarification please? (Score:2)
Easily solved (Score:2)
Re:Clarification please? (Score:1)
Cool hack, anyway, and yet another proof that security by obscurity doesn't work.
Is really RDS the best solution? (Score:1)
DoS attacks spreading? (Score:1)
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:1)
They expect a launch soon, NTL has done a bit better in this respect.
In the case of ADSL BT seem to be starting to offer services now although it's in very limited areas at the moment.
Re:Who are the pirates? (Score:2)
Pirates can be subversive in their own right as well. I seem to remember visiting an HMV shop in London over Christmas in 1977, and The Sex Pistols were at the top of their charts, even though their music was banned in the UK. I'm not sure exactly how this worked, but I seem to remember pirates had something to do with it.
--
Re:It happened to me long time ago in Italy (Score:1)
So this is an option, not a requirement? Do all RDS-enabled radios have the option of switching it off?
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:1)
Sounds like a job for crypto (Score:3)
This'd probably be really easy to implement in hardware - drive the cost of the radio up a couple bucks, at most.
Re: Teletext? (Score:1)
What about the listener's rights? (Score:3)
Why just help the broadcasters? How about coming up with countermeasures to help the listeners? Forgive me for sounding like an over-zealous culture-jammer; but does anyone else feel that maybe they should be concerned about the listeners that are having something they didn't ask for forced upon them? Rather than the corporations that are having business stolen from them?
There seems to be a bias here. More of a concern for businesses then human beings. If a rep from Pepsi stole my Coke and forced me to drink a Pepsi (no offence intended to Pepsi) I'd like to think the police would arrest him and press charges on my behalf rather than Coke's. They sound more concerned that a company is losing business than they are about people's rights being violated.
Re:Way Too Cool (Score:2)
Oh gawd yes! Mobile 500mw transmitter, with RDS spoofing. Handsfree mic, so yr not so obvious when talking to the guy in front of you.
That's even better than the "LED scrolling sign in the windscreen" idea!
-Isaac
Big Up Pirate Radio!!! (Score:1)
-- Shabba Ranks
Re:As soon as its adopted in the US... (Score:1)
And Yes, on a couple of stations they do the unedited versions of several songs... I don't particularly like the *cleansed* versions of the music, but then again, I don't particularly like answering questions from my 5 year old like "Daddy, what does f**k mean? and why does that guy do it to all the b***hes?"
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:1)
There's even a WEB interface for it, too... (Score:5)
-- ----------------------------------------------
Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!
Re:Easily solved (Score:1)
It just defeats the purpose of RDS, the overlays and TRUE emergency information if it's disabled.
But then again, I have never heard a pirate radio station here in Australia. I have never even heard of one on the news.
Maybe I just lead a sheltered life.
Me.
RDS? No thank you. (Score:1)
The problem is: do you know what type of stations transmit throughout the entire country? Only the big corporate ones. So all RDS gives is to listen to the same Top40 hits as you travel across the country. The only other stations that transmit nationwide of government stations like the BBC in England, RAI in Italy, etc... Those stations are also worthless (hmmm, wait, I actually like BBC!).
The only good use for RDS in America is to listen to NPR. Other than that always listen 'left of the dial'. That is where all the good music is.
Peace!
--Ivan, weenie NT4 user: bite me!
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:2)
I have RDS in a crap home theatre receiver of mine, and was psyched until I discovered how few stations had RDS in this bass ackward country.
BTW, teletext is just too neat, though when I was in Munich the RDS confused me somewhat as my German is quite rustig..
Your Working Boy,
why bother??? (Score:1)
Wireless Internet/MP3 radio - slightly offtopic (Score:1)
Once this technology gets wide acceptance, all these "pirate" problems will become obsolete...
Re:More details, please (OT) (Score:2)
Last time i checked, the UK was in Europe. Although lately i wish we wern't
Re: RDS Rules! (Score:1)
It does other things too, like synchronize your clocks.
Re:Ha, Ha, Ha! (Score:1)
RDS is optional, you can listen radio stations sending RDS programs without RDS. Many RDS radios have option to turn off RDS.. Some stations use RDS text feature for advertising, that's a another good reason also to turn it off.
I've found it usefull though, it really helps 'tuning' right channels. You don't have to remember frequencys when you see name of the radio station.
Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner (Score:2)
For example where I live we have some independent local stations: Metro FM, Century and Galaxy as well as BBC Radio Newcastle. If you're listening to one of the independent stations and have traffic announcements switched on you only hear the announcements made by that particular station.
If you're listening to a national BBC station (e.g. Radio 1) it'll switch over to the local BBC station when the local station is broadcasting a traffic announcement.
Therefore the way I see it although it's possible to make an RDS radio switch frequencies for a traffic announcement it has to be the station you're listening to that lets it.
The pirates have probably just found a loophole in the way the BBC have set up their stations traffic announcements and are exploiting it.
(Please remember what I say may be wrong and if it is I'd like to know).
No wonder the govt is mad (Score:1)
This technology seems to be one of the worst ideas I have ever heard of. From the article:
"When a local traffic announcement is being broadcast, a signal is sent and the car radio switches to it."
On the surface, this technology seems to be harmless. In the event of an emergency, it can be used to quickly inform the public of important information.
The problem here is that it does not seem to be optional. (correct me if I am wrong, as I said, my knowledge level on this is VERY limited.) If this 'switching' is not optional, it can very easily be used to control what information is allowed on the radio. If there are any 'incorrect viewpoints' being expressed, well, simply tune all radios to a special frequency that is broadcasting a recording saying that radio services are temporarily unavailable. Then track down whoever is making the unacceptable broadcast.
No wonder the government is so upset about this break of their (non) security...Imagine, someone other than the govt telling people what it is ok to think!
They make "off" buttons for a reason (Score:1)
"the radio stays tuned in until the car goes out of range or the driver switches off the RDS feature."
So, it's easy to fix this problem:
Step 1. Notice the signals' been hijacked (hmm... I don't remember my Classic Rock station ever playing 'N Sync before....)
Step 2. Hit the "RDS Off" button (or equivalent)
doesn't seem so tough to me....
Re:More details, please (Score:1)
OH MY GOD that we don't need. We have too few good real radio stations now with out them buying up good radio stations to make networks. Jxsxs Fxckxng Chrxst! is there anything these people will not do to force us to hear their god forsaken commercials. I tell people I don't need mp3s or cds because I listen to the radio but now they will ruin that.
Re:Clarification please? (Score:1)
They appear to have used the published RDS standards to make devices that constantly transmit the signal to switch, thereby grabbing listeners.
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:1)
Reminds me of something from the outer limits... (Score:1)
"There is nothing wrong with your radio
Do not adjust your radio set.
We are in control of this transmission
-=- SiKnight
I wish they'd do that here (Score:2)
When will people learn (Score:2)
Any feature, on any system, can be used and abused. You have to think of the possible aspects of a feature before you design it.
Example: Macros in MS Office having so much power.
Reason: you can do some pretty amazing stuff with the right programming in a macro.
Actual usage (abusage?): Macro Viruses
This is just another example of someone not thinking ahead.
---
Re:correction! (Score:1)
But here in the UK we're densely packed - and if we want to have usable broadcasting this means that use of frequencies simply must be coordinated somehow - or the result would be a truly appaling service for everyone.
Our broadcasting system is full of compromises as it is. A significant chunk cannot receieve the fifth of our national TV channels ( larhely on the South coast because signal here would interferece with the French. On the other hand Radio 4 ( The BBC's national speech program) uses up about six channels on vhf AND is also broadcast on Long Wave 198M ) because other wise a significant number of people can't get it on VHF.
(And every summer when England is being thrashed in some Cricket test match somewhere they grab R4 LW to broadcast a commentary for the duration of the match (3 or 4 days). And then all the people who wanted to hear Radio 4 not the test match moan on and one about it, write letters to the papers etc etc for weeks and weeks afterwards
Anyway - when Pirates broadcast it usually means they're stopping someone, somewhere from receiving a legitimate station.
Re:Ha, Ha, Ha! (Score:1)
I don't think there are many radios which forces you to use this system. On all the radios with RDS that I've seen, you can disable the RDS-system.
Re:No wonder the govt is mad (Score:2)
Limited, indeed. The BBC News article linked to by the Slashdot article said:
(emphasis mine). Read carefully first, and only then opine; yes, a radio that can always be forced to listen to station X rather than station Y would be bad, but that's not what RDS radios are.
Re:correction! (Score:2)
Second, there are only a finite # of frequencies with which you can put together a coherent national broacast system. Without licencing there would be chaos - what if your pirate station picked the police frequency? Ambulance? Fire? It doesn't bear thinking about.
Re:What about the listener's rights? (Score:2)
The government of my country works for the corporations therein. How about yours?
-jwb
*** IT'S OPTIONAL *** Re:No wonder the govt is mad (Score:2)
2. Very limited info is delivered to the user, including:
Station name
Station music type (Blues/Jazz etc)
Station Freq's
Traffic Flag
3. 'TP' (Traffic Programme) is OPTIONAL. You just hit the TP button to turn it on or off - it's not totalitarian! We're not that bad!
The Traffic signal is broadcast by any station delivering traffic info. The radio detects these signals and switches to that station, if you have selected TP 'ON'. The signal is not broadcast by the station you are listening to.
RDS is already used in the US (Score:2)
It's not really useful yet, but hopefully as more stations start using it it will be possible to quickly scan the radio stations for a specific type of programming.
crypt my radio and i hurt you (Score:2)
You can make an AM reciever from some wire, some sheets of tin foil, a plastic bag and a lump of coal. Of course, you need headphones and a verra big antenna.
Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime (Score:2)
Addendum (Score:2)
I also noticed a bunch of typos in the first message
Re:Just hilarous. (Score:2)
---
Let's clear thing up: (Score:2)
Also, there's a restriction here, a radio station cannot use this feature, unless it really involves a critical traffic situation.
There are several other interesting features to RDS, here's an example of what the Norwegian Broadcasting company (NRK) programme 2 contains: FM modulated sound (Duh!), GPS ground beacon time correction signal (For the naval traffic, it's used to adjust the signal from the satelites.), RDS (With RDS Text for displaying what the channel contains, RDS time, RDS PTY Programme Type (It can be Pop, Opera, Talk etc.), Channel ID and other digital control signals for special pagers etc..
Quite a lot, that is. I'm actually amazed that USA still use AM radio.
Re:Clarification please? (Score:2)
The bandwidth for RDS is 37.5 bits per second - so keys and digital certificates are out. Maybe in the days of digital radio, but not for RDS.
Re: Teletext? (Score:2)
The article says the standards were published. (Score:2)
Not very closed then, eh? So your step one is kinda off.
So there is an "ignore traffic broadcast" button, huh? Guess that means your step two is off, too.
*sigh* Try reading the article.
Try reading the article. It has an off button! (Score:2)
You don't have to turn it on if you don't want to.
If you're afraid of being sucked into a pirate station, or even a legit station, *you can turn it off*.
Please return to your normal comment posting.
man m'i ever glad there's state-run radio here (Score:3)
They keep eachother more-or-less honest (ok so both commercial and government radio are inherently biased) and the government radio (CBC) has no advertising. None. No crappy programming to grab listeners (stern) and some of the best people in the radio business (shelagh rogers and peter gzowski)
the us public stations are public, not state-run, and have those obnoxious we-want-money-from-our-listeners things.
#include <signal.h> \ #include <stdlib.h> \ int main(void){signal(ABRT,SIGIGN);while(1){abort(-1)
Re:Sounds like a job for crypto (Score:2)
While it may be not possible now to successfully crack it quickly, the techonological advancements of computers will make it possible to crack it easily. Standards like RDS would take a long time to fade out - they just can't decide one day "oh - the public key is cracked, time to make a new standard, let everyone buy a new radio".
I'm waiting for more appliances, car radios in particular to offer flash ROM upgrades, making things like new encryption algorithums and standards prevent obsoletion of the equipment.
It is absolutely essential - imagine, if the y2k bug could have been patched on devices with embedded, irreplacable chips using a simply flash rom upgrade.
While this probably isn't the best example, the potential bugs and exploits will only be uncovered with a matter of time, and unlike software where it's a matter of downloading and patching, hardware is definitely a matter of concern.
- Detritus
"I never really liked computers, but then the server went down on me"
Mobile Hijacking of radio signal.. (Score:2)
Anyhow, back when I was incarcerated in high school (jonkatz fodder) a friend of mine rigged up a little transmitter that overrided the signal of FM radio. It cost a whopping $20 to build, it ran off the car battery and was about the size of an 8mm tape, not counting the little antenna he attached to it. We would amuse ourselves by driving on the interstate and scaring little teenyboppers in their VWs listening to (back then) nirvana or butt err pearl jam. The look on their faces when that would cut off for "Hey, you! You in the black VW!..." or something cool like underworld. Though the signal was mono and had a dynamic range worth shit, we mainly kept it to vocal hijinks. Now that you mention it, even "legit" FM has a horrible sound both from a technical and a musical standpoint. Hijacking a signal like this RDS thing isn't all that new, RDS just makes it easier
Re:When will get RDS in the US? (Score:3)
M.o. dun said:
Well, if memory serves, teletext in Europe has a lot more services besides closed captioning--for example, complete program listings, newspaper/news reporting feeds, online shopping on some systems, etc. (Comparing closed captioning in the US to teletext services is a lot like comparing, say, computerised news services to a full-featured BBS system or multimedia-enabled web site. Europe uses it FAR more extensively than we do.)
This is not to say that teletext-type systems are COMPLETELY unknown in the US (I'll give an example of one in a bit), but part of it is that Europe has dedicated the bandwidth for it for some time. In the US, if memory serves, text services including closed captioning are carried on the 21st or 24th line of the 525-line NTSC signal, which is not a hell of a lot of room to stick stuff.
SOME teletext-type stuff besides closed captioning does exist in some areas, though. ABC stations carry program schedules sometimes on the text mode of a closed-caption signal (yes, with closed captioning there are two different modes and anywhere from two to four channels in each mode--regular closed caption mode and "text" mode which is essentially stripped-down teletext--yes, Slashdot readers (at least in the US) can test this on any TV made after 1993 or so with a 13" screen or larger--federal law mandates now that all TVs 13" screen or more have closed-captioning built in, and all of 'em have the text mode, even the cheap-arse models :). Some other stations will do this too, and on the other channels of text or regular CC mode may have captioning in other languages (I'd expect most stations in Miami to offer closed-captioning in Spanish too).
Possibly the neatest use I've seen for "text mode" in US-style closed captioning is how The Kentucky Network [ket.org] or KET, our statewide PBS network, does an agricultural teletext service called AGTEXT in cooperation with the University of Kentucky's agricultural school...basically has weather info, stockyards reports, agricultural hints, agricultural-related weather, etc. In the Louisville area it can be picked up on WKMJ-68 (KET 1; channel 13 on Louisville-area Insight Cable) on channel-1 text mode; I'm pretty darn sure the other KET affiliates statewide (with the exception of KET-2 (WKPC-15) in Louisville, which was formerly an independent PBS affiliate till they were bought out by KET--yes, we actually have TWO public broadcasting channels in Louisville, with different scheduling and double the Britcoms :) also carry the AGTEXT teletext feeds.
I'm not aware if anyone else is doing the AGTEXT thing or similar feeds like how is done in Kentucky, but it'd be very interesting to find out just what CAN be found on other channels/text mode across the US and Canada...maybe a list ought to be done. :)
Read the article again (or for the first time). (Score:2)
Hmm... there's a thought...
I can't disagree with you on the "left of the dial" comment, though. But consider that many of those stations, who broadcast traffic, will probably also spit out an RDS signal... though I can't think of any stations of that sort in my area that DO broadcast traffic... *shrug*
Re: Teletext? (Score:2)
The Original Bobski dun said:
Actually, if US-based teletext is the same thing as "text mode" on modern closed-captioning equipped TVs (all TVs with diagonal screen measurements of 13 inches or larger built since 1993 must have built-in CC by law; every CC-equipped TV I've ever seen has the "text mode" in CC along with regular mode, and usually two to four channels of both regular and text mode per TV channel at that) then not only is it not dead but has sort of been blended in with CC in general.
The largest use in most areas for "text mode"/US teletext seems to be in program listings for the hearing impaired (I know ABC occasionally lists these in text mode); in Kentucky, the public broadcast system works with University of Kentucky ag-school and county extension offices in running AGTEXT which is a full system for providing agricultural info (everything from weather to stockyards prices to insect infestation alerts to farming tips) on KET stations. (I discovered it accidentially on Louisville's main KET affiliate when I got a TV with CC [when they were first requiring them by law] and was playing about with the different modes--and was quite suprised to see the teletext in text mode on WKMJ-68 :)
I don't know if anyone else is doing anything similar to AGTEXT anymore, but I'd imagine so in states which are still largely rural and also have statewide public broadcast networks and/or big ag-schools like UK has. I think AGTEXT is neat as hell, anyways :)
RDS vs. DAB (Score:3)
RDS is pretty cool because you get extra digital info. But wait! DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting) is already around the corner. DAB is already broadcasting in pilot projects in Europe (and probably in other places too) and has interference free "CD quality" (mpeg layer 2 200kbit/s) audio. Of course, there will be a host of other goodies (and not so goodies) like the ability to incorporate "pay-radio" etc.
The fun part is this: (taken from the dab faq)
What are 'additional services'?
DAB was developed with the aim of improving radio reception. This is why audio transmission was at the forefront of the development process. But DAB, as a digital transmission system, can transmit other data as well as audio. In principle any type of information can be transmitted by DAB, provided simply that it is available in digital form and does not exceed the maximum available DAB data rate (approx. 1.7 Mbit/s). Examples of such additional services are still pictures accompanying radio programmes, digitalised traffic messages (Traffic Message Channel), electronic newspapers, software updates and even animated video. This process leads to 'multimedia broadcasting' in which all forms of information can be conveyed via the common transmission medium DAB. In this context DAB could be described as the 'cordless information highway'. In contrast to multimedia applications via TV/cable, DAB additional services can also be received in-car and with portable equipment.
I wonder how long it will take for pirates to tap into this flexible resource, full of possibilities
look at http://www.worlddab.org for more
Re:Is this already happening in the US? (Score:2)
Re:FYI - The Empeg car MP3 player has RDS. (Score:2)
NOw, a year and a half ago, I think it was around then.. I thought it was pretty cool, and the price was okay.
They said by March 1999 they would be in full production.
It's almost March 2000 and they still aren't in full production. They have shipped beta units.. whee. ANd the price is too much.
Go look at the price of SBC's, and the price of drives, etc.... it's *NOT* that expensive.
A chip containing a full stereo mp3 decoder I can pick up for $5. Now, I'm not saying it's cheap, or can be done in 2 days.... but if I can build the exact same thing in my shop for arond $300-$400 bucks, there is no reason for a mass-produced version to cost over a thousand.
RDS and Australia (Score:3)
There are a few stations that already support RDS in Australia (eg: TripleJ [triplej.net.au]), and systems are available here that support the RDS standard. It's been running here quite a while, it's just that not many radio stations have picked it up. I have already accidently tuned into one radio station here that was transmitting someone elses RDS signal. It didn't last long though, they vanished pretty quick.
RDS is a very old technology, and it's a real wonder this hasn't happened before. RDS is carried on a "subchannel" on the FM signal, and digital data such as the station name, time signal, etc, is transmitted. My car syncronises the inbuilt clock with that of the radio station every 2-3 minutes. (It did take TripleJ about a month to adjust to daylight savings however).
But it's not hard to fake another stations RDS signature. If a station transmits someone elses RDS signature, and your radio is set to tune to the strongest station with the same RDS sig, well.. you can guess the result I think. The original idea is to allow for movement between different locations/states that have the same station broadcasting on a different frequency, and having your car radio follow the signal automatically and seamlessly. It's just an abuse of the system that no one bothered to cater for, and even if they did, it'd be hard to implement, as the data is all one way. You could capture the data and simply re-send it, or even receive their signal and then re-transmit it. It may have even been considered, and deemed simply not worth the trouble of worrying about it.
If anything, this will lead to more publicity for pirate stations, but that also means that the people designated for tracking down pirate radio stations might hear about it a lot sooner than normal. And if they have a list of authorised frequencies that a particular RDS signal is transmitted on, then it's just a matter of singling out the ones that have a valid RDS signal but the wrong frequency. For the pirates, I'd count this as a two-edged sword.
It's been in the US Since 1996 (Score:2)
Pioneer Car Stereo w/ RDS @ pioneerelectronics.com [pioneerelectronics.com]
BTW: They do have on/off settings
Re:crypt my radio and i hurt you (Score:2)
RDS abuse my commercial stations (Score:2)
Traffic news is good but there is an increasing amount of advertising and promotion of their other shows creaping into the traffic announcements and I would hope their licenses prohibit this.
Other interesting uses RDS (Score:2)
Half a year ago I heard about a related application of RDS: the Dutch police are dicking around with automated speed cameras that can read your license plate. They wanted to combine this with RDS to warn speeders: "Hello RB-VH-97, you were just caught doing 140KPh in a 100Kph zone. The Hfl 450,- fine is in the mail. Have a nice day". Kinda cool isn't it?
RDS & DVD -- Think this is bad? EAS! (Score:2)
But if you think that the RDS situation is bad, wait until someone figures out the EAS system. This is the emergency warning system in the US that replaced the old EBS system. Having worked in college radio, I've had a small amount of experience with it. From what I understand of it, the network is basically a big tree structure with the FCC on top. They have a super secret code that can transmit across the network that will allow the President to interrupt all TV and Radio broadcasts and transmit what he wanted. I'm just waiting for a modern-day "Captain Midnight" to figure this out and hijack every single broadcast across the nation. Heh.
For more info on the EAS check out:
http://www.fcc.gov/cib/easfact.html
Re:The article says the standards were published. (Score:2)
However, this does nothing to alay the no authentication or common sense "auto-ignore if > N requests per time period are made" features. Why aren't those present? Your comment adds nothing to my point, it merely detracts.
It'd be nice if you nitpickers would read other's nitpicking posts before nitpicking yourselves. It's really annoyed to see 4 replies that amount to, "I saw one thing you did wrong which is mentioned in the article. You are stupid, I am not. Read the article next time, stupid head."
---
Re:correction! (Score:2)
Re:The article says the standards were published. (Score:2)
Arg, don't defuse my anger
If you're talking about IE integration, I'd like to not have x * 100mb (where X is >= 1) of IE code on the HD. Oh wait, I use Linux..
The autoignore feature would be nice, as well as more user controls. IE: control the autoignore level, etc. PGP-style authentication could work, with each user getting a public key from a company they want bullitens from, putting the smart card in their radio, and only gettings bullitens from that company. Just an idea.
---
Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner (Score:2)