Linux-based Internet Radio Appliance 109
sysadmn writes "From CMP Media's Winmag Win Letter, A company called Kerbango has built what it bills as the world's first standalone Internet radio, which can play any of the claimed 4,000 audio streams floating around the Net as well as more conventional AM or FM broadcasts. Tuning is accomplished through the Kerbango Tuning Service, which displays the user interface on a half-VGA grayscale LCD monitor. The radio has
a built-in computer, with an 80MHz PowerPC chip running Linux with 8MB of DRAM, 8MB of flash memory, and a whole bunch of codecs.
It'll be available in the Spring. They're not saying how much.
"
Name 'Kerbango' = lawsuit form Scientologists (Score:1)
Lucas filed a similar suit when FASA released the game (now knows as 'BattleTech') under the name 'BattleDroids' back in the eighties.
They are looking for Linux programmers (Score:1)
Re:USB? (Score:2)
The USB stack from 2.3 has been back ported to 2.2. It's not integrated with the kernel, it's a separate patch. The last time I looked into it, there were a couple of device level drivers that wouldn't work with it because they used other 2.3 specific features, but it was otherwise complete. Wish I could find the URL again.
This is very cool, but not what I want... and why. (Score:1)
But as a geek I'm very happy to use or configure a general purpose computer to do all of this stuff.
My most likely scenario would be one general-purpose computer _dedicated_ to all of the following, and one general-purpose computer for
general use (web surfing, word processing, etc).
The dedicated one would do:
dvd
tv/vcr (a-la Tivo if only the software were there!)
internet radio (preferably using dsp rather than cpu)
local mp3 storage
file server(?)
As a geek I see no need to buy a dedicated device when I can set up an even better dedicated device myself (and have fun doing it).
The place where I see myself buying a dedicated device where my geekly skills aren't quite up to making my own is a portable device for the car/motorcycle that does (or has modules for) all of the following:
gps w/uploadable mapping
packet radio location system (why not!)
mp3 (using a dsp, not cpu again)
radar detector -- using dsp algorithms like the valentine one, maybe with multiple antennas, etc so that you can set up and mess with the software settings (hopefully even source code) yourself.
weatherproof (for the motorcycle)
low power (yay transmeta!)
All of these things in a small box that plugs into the car or motorcycle would be ideal.
Re:Tivo -- more than just software (Score:1)
I realize that Tivo is also partly selling a service which provides listings of all the shows and playtimes, etc which I would be more than happy to pay for independantly.
The real thing is being able to set up/mess around with your own hardware and software.
Wow (Score:1)
5MHz+Linux = 4,000x better. Spiffy.
Re:Quit wasting our bandwidth! (Score:1)
The internet rocks for solving distribution problems like this.
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:1)
I'm an avid radio listener when I'm in my car. Any other place I won't listen to the radio and I never watch TV or go to the movies. For the life of me, I can't see why anyone would buy such a device!
Because most people aren't freaks who never watch TV or go to the movies, and because local radio blows goats.
Most of us are sedentary couch and mouse potatoes, and the Kerbango Internet radio sounds like a great way to do a little more digital grazing. No longer will I have to sit at my computer and feign productivity while I listen to decent radio stations in other cities. I can sit on my couch and completely dispel any illusions of productivity, and there's even a possibility I can listen from the comfort of my porcelain couch.
Any technology that lets me listen to more baseball games on the radio is a good one. Is Vin Scully still doing Dodgers games?
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:2)
Most people are not freaks if they choose not to watch TV. My reasons to actually watch TV are decreasing every day.
Anyone who doesn't watch TV is a demographic freak. Next thing you'll be telling me is that you read books. Shudder.
> Television and digital video are better for sports if that's what you really want.
Radio is the command-line interface to baseball. Television puts a nice graphic user interface on the sport, but if you want direct access to the things that make baseball great, you either go to a game or turn on the radio.
I WANT ONE! (Score:1)
Re:I WANT ONE! (Score:1)
What did they fix in G2? (Score:2)
-jwb
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:2)
Just wanted to let you know that I got a fairly decent set-top DVD player for $155 USD here in Pennsylvania.
(slashdot is having problems, sorry if this got submitted more than once)Re:Nice (Score:1)
I run an Icecast server at www.fatfreeradio.net and it's GREAT software.
--hunter
Re:USB? (Score:1)
and here is the USB HOWTO [dynamine.net]
How Much? (Score:1)
This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:3)
They say the PC is going the way of the dinosaur-- after all, these little boxes are so much cheaper!
Cool, it runs Linux. Cool, it uncrunches streaming MP3. But I've got a PC that does that.
And funny, that very same PC plays games, too. And it can watch TV for me. And it keeps track of my finances and my recipes. You know, all those things I'd've had to buy a $200-300 little consumer-grade box to do. But somehow, those little single-purpose boxes sell.
A hundred bucks gets you into a low-end webtv. Another three hundred gets you into a cheap set-top DVD player. Toss in a hundred for a Playstation, a hundred for a VCR, at least a hundred for this gadget. That's $700-- and we're using last generation's game box, an analog system for watching our TV for us... Switching to a Dreamcast and a Tivo turns that $700 into closer to $1000. And I still can't do my finances, can't do word processing (and I don't have a place to plug a printer in even if I could!) and I can't store my recipes, $1000 later.
And then what we don't get are HDTV cards for our PCs that already have monitors with sufficient resolution to display HDTV.
I don't get it. Why is it these little single-use boxes sell? Is the general public really _that_ afraid of a general purpose personal computer?
-JDF
Freedom from the corporate world, or new master? (Score:4)
This raises some questions:
What I'm really interested in seeing is a good "internet transistor radio" (when they finally release palm pilots with both Richochet and an audio jack, I'll be happy... you can squeeze listenable audio over a Richochet modem, high-quality audio can come later). Second to that, I'm sure an "internet car radio" would be of interest to all the people stuck in car commuting. This particular type of gadget is third down the list. Certainly it's a drawback that it's stationary, but a webradio for the bedroom/livingroom that's cheaper than a full PC would still fill a niche. At least it has a quarter-VGA screeen on it that allows for *some* flexibility in what you can do with it.
The great advantage of a web radio would be to get people out from under the corporate conglomerate blandness that the world seems to be sinking under.
The great danger is that in the effort to make it simpler to access web radio streams, they'll take away some of your freedom to choose what you hear.
Bars, etc (Score:1)
which use cable radio for their consumers. Bars, whatnot could have many more stations available using internet radio... And imagine, you could set up your own streams.... "Hey stevie, gimme a lager, and set the kerbango to irqzero radio".
Re:break out your slide rule genius (Score:1)
The obligatory questions: (Score:2)
Second, what Linux are they running? Is it a modified LinuxPPC? Or is it custom-built? Is it burned onto the ROM? Have they made any changes to the kernel? If so, do they intend to put them back into the code base?
Third, will I be able to telnet into it? To network it like a regular computer? To replace the OS? In short, what is its hack value?
Fourth and last (but not least), how would one go about setting up a Beowulf cluster of these things?
Re:The obligatory questions: (Score:2)
Because I care about them.
I don't understand why people on Slashdot expect a device to be super-hackable just because it is based on Linux.
I don't expect it to be super-hackable. I just wanted to know whether it was super-hackable.
Sheesh. Calm down, dude.
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:1)
get each one a computer and that's quite expensive...
But modular set-top boxes for each can be cheaper.
obviously if you have the money, deck your house in a dozen PCs, but if you don't happen to have $10,000 then getting specialized hardware may be the better choice. Also, things like a dreamcast or DVD player may be several hundred now, but they historically come down in price.
Mouse trail effect? (Score:2)
I turn that off for the duration when I work on someones laptop and this page bothered me enough that I emailed them asking to reconsider the "feature".
Oh well, I'm probably a little off-topic, but it does look like a cool box. I don't know if I could get used to paying a subscription service to listen to music.
Russ
Company mottos: (Score:1)
Making multi-media single again.
Bringing you today's technology--yesterday!
More choices through fewer options.
You'll never want to spend the same amount on a simple radio tuner card to get the same effect again!
--
Suggested Retail Price (Score:1)
This one looks promising as well... (Score:1)
Re:Nice (Score:1)
almost as many as the computer it tries to replace. Is there *any* gained functionality of one of these things over using my PC, and its "bigger than 2 watt" speakers?
--
Re:Never underestimate the buying public (Score:1)
They *don't* want a seperate box for everything. Most don't even know what *everything* comprises. I dunno, this whole appliance craze seems to have its foundations in marketing, not in useful products. I wouldn't want one and I think most of this stuff is too confusing to appeal to the public at large ("You mean I can listen to the radio over the Internet with this?" "Yes" "Do I nee it to do that?" "No" "Then why should I use it?" "Convenience" "But I don't listen now, how will this make it more convenient") Too much too soon, the same reason why 90% of the companies that went public last year will fold the moment their employees vest and jump ship.
--
Tivo -- more than just software (Score:1)
I think the Tivo uses a special drive from Quantum that has the ability to read and write at the same time. Most drives can only read or write at any given time.
Where do you think they got it? (Score:3)
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:2)
This is exactly the pattern I see with my mobile/cell phone. Yes it's nice to use the thing and call your friends all the time, but on the other hand, when the bill arrives, I really wonder if it's worth it.
Re:What did they fix in G2? (Score:2)
LinuxPPC.org petitioned Real for a port, they said they would think about it (as of 12/99).
The petition & info can be found here:
http://www.linuxppc.org/real.shmtl [linuxppc.org]
break out your slide rule genius (Score:1)
Re:What did they fix in G2? (Score:1)
Don't expect a company that doesn't even support all Windows(MS)(TM)($$) varieties, to easilly support some more 'exotic' platforms..
Mad.
Re:What did they fix in G2? (Score:1)
----------------------------------------------
Re:break out your slide rule genius (Score:2)
--
Re:I WANT ONE! (Score:1)
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:1)
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:1)
But anyway, I think one underrealized application for this is to play mp3s off of your own hard drive. The $300 price (if true) is pretty cheap for something of this sort. Though how good the software is will make a big difference.
I've been looking for something exactly like this. Something that would allow me to store my hundreds of cds, and provide jukebox like access to them. I've been in the process of throwing it together myself, but having it all prebuilt would be nice.
It helps, obviously, if you've already got a home network setup.
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:1)
That's not the point. It's small and quiet and does the one thing I'd want a PC next to my stereo to do today. This thing is a little uglier than I'd like for that particular application, but it's better than an ATX case.
If someone made small quiet (no fan or disk noise) general purpose machines we could use instead of special purpose boxes like these, I believe people would be using them. I haven't managed to find any. Have you?
PenguinRadio will do this from space (Score:3)
It's a very interesting time to be involved in Internet Radio
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:1)
> single-use boxes sell? Is the general public
> really _that_ afraid of a general purpose
> personal computer?
I have 4 PCs (really 3 1/2, one them isn't done yet) in my house so I don't think that I can be classified as being afraid of them, but for the right price I would proably buy 4 of these puppys (or something like them).
Because they are single purpose applances they can make trade-offs PC's can't, mostly in size, power, heat, noise, and usablity. I don't want a general PC in my living room or by my bed, general purpose PCs are too noisy for ether and to big form my bedroom. Maybe next year things will be diffrent, but I am not sure market forces are going to drive things that way.
In fact I am even tempted to put one these next to my computer so I don't lose my tunes when my PC locks-up/crashes or when netscape starts and sucks down all the cycles (ok I won't have this problem if I did not run windows, but for me Quicken is a mission critical app....)
This day in age computing power is not so precious that it has to be concentrated in one place.
Function before Fashion (Score:1)
It looks like some bad knock off of the Nickelodeon radio alarm clock. What is so wrong with a nice little brushed aluminum case? While Im sure I will look into this device for its function, can we say bye bye old hacked up PC in the pizza-box, I most definetly wont have it displayed in all its day-glow glory in my living room.
Re:Good quick cheap (Score:1)
Not to be nitpicky, but I think soon is really similar to quick, so "good, quick, cheap, choose two" is about the same as saying "Good, quick, cheap, soon, choose three". The soon is redundant.
Just thought I would be picky today
Nice (Score:2)
They forget to mention above that this little thing will play your MP3s accross your 10/100 Network (doesn't say how; samba, ftp or what?) and it already has the network card. It also allows external storage devices to be plugged into it.
This little thing has a lot of features...
--
Re:Nice (Score:2)
I'd be quite happy to have this as my alarm clock, and I'm not sure my bedside cabinet would take the strain of a PC.....
And I'd hope this would be better than a PC too..
--
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:2)
pop-40 or "alternative" crap or country music, with an occasional 60s/70s classic rock station thrown in. College radio is the only interesting medium, but quality and signal strength can vary. If I wanted to hear Pantera on the radio...
I can't. I don;t think internet radio is the answer, but "internet" and "linux" should help their IPO
So you are willing to buy a dedicated device that needs it's own line to access things via wireless internet connections? Wouldn't buying the CDs be a better option?
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:2)
Most people are not freaks if they choose not to watch TV. My reasons to actually watch TV are decreasing every day.
Most of us are sedentary couch and mouse potatoes, and the Kerbango Internet radio sounds like a great way to do a little more digital grazing. No longer will I have to sit at my computer and feign productivity while I listen to
decent radio stations in other cities. I can sit on my couch and completely dispel any illusions of productivity, and there's even a possibility I can listen from the comfort of my porcelain couch.
The problem that I see is that eventually even if you are wealthy these little fees could start to add up rather rapidly and no one would ever notice until you actually add them up. Paying over $300/month for various services could start to be common. Until perhaps internet access via this device is as free as common FM or AM radio I think that most people will shy away from it.
Any technology that lets me listen to more baseball games on the radio is a good one. Is Vin Scully still doing Dodgers games?
Television and digital video are better for sports if that's what you really want. Check out something like ESPN or the like.
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:2)
from the Internet, and yet are completely clueless and fearful of your standard workstation. Being uneducated is one thing, but the number of people who do not wish to educate themselves remains very large.
I just don't understand it. People have to have a job to eat. I go to college to get a better job. And yet it is theoretically possible to be a compelete fool and get a good job? Please tell me how?
As a customer service representative for a large software company, I get clueless AOLers calling in everyday blaming us for the problems caused by their cluelessness regarding computers. I consider it a Good Thing that your average
AOLer will likely be using a set-top box or a web pad in a couple of years. It leaves them with less room to screw things up. You might say that these devices won't encourage them to educate themselves about computers, but the fact
is that they're not making any attempts to educate themselves as it is.
This is a bad thing. Let me tell you why. The PC market is run by people usually buying PCs in mass. That means the things that people most want to use a computer for: games, and the internet. Companies come out with small black boxes that do the same things for less but more if you add them together to get the same functionality as a PC. What do you think will happen to general PC prices?
*BOOM* (rocket shoots towards the stratosphere)
And guess what happens then? People like me who are having ecconomic trouble just keeping up with technology will be screwed again.
These are bad things but I guess people who want to learn and get ahead are just usually screwed over anyway.
Well, here you go then ... (Score:1)
Never underestimate the buying public (Score:2)
Not many people want to power a computer up, rattle keys, whizz a mouse around and all the attendant house keeping. They want to get home from work, crack open a beer and slob.
Now, if someone could think up a way for all these household electrics to play nicely with each other...
USB? (Score:1)
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:1)
Assuming the stand-alone box system works for the consumer, why waste all the money for a lot of similar components, while also having a PC that can do all? The logical next step is one server PC (ahem, what OS???) sitting somewhere inconspicuous, and a mini wireless network that provides all the other stuff? Okay, this kind of system isn't going to be the best for, say, a CD player, where you don't really need much processing power at all (even DSP stuff is pretty cheap), and the whole idea is to be able to pop in a new CD when you get tired of the old one and do so very easily. But for something like an MP3 radio, TiVo, Dreamcast, HDTV tuner, etc., this way is almost perfect! Two reasons for the almost: (1) you can't run a remote Dreamcast on a Pentium-120. You have to have a system with some might, and (2) be careful not to saturate your airways. Seriously, good-quality (e.g. HDTV @ even 480p) requires a heck of a lot of bandwidth. Direct connections would be so much better. Yeah, gigabit ethernet will handle HDTV; about ten 1080p streams (Ken is drooling). No need to even have enough RAM or CPU on each box to implement a TCP stack. Just enough for a bare minimum Ethernet frame plus a one-hop route protocol. Easy for the designers. Pressure people to get Linux drivers for stuff, too!
By the way: don't go shelling out that however-much-it-is for an HDTV tuner card just yet (unless it is totally flashable and has an FFT chip to spare). (Your handy MPEG decoder card will still work nicely.) 8VSB (the current HDTV standard), to put it mildly, might have to be slightly modified. (I'm purposely trying to be vague.)
Having fun?
Kenneth
Re:break out your slide rule genius (Score:1)
An extension of the PC (Score:1)
Guy with the watersports fetish (WAS:-Re:REMINDER) (Score:1)
I think such information is best posted in your usual haunt... alt.sex.stories.watersports.cock-jockies.
;)
--
If I had one euro for every witty sig that I wrote, I would have enough for a small bottle of French beer
To many unknowns. (Score:1)
Re:The obligatory questions: (Score:1)
I don't understand why people on Slashdot expect a device to be super-hackable just because it is based on Linux. This is a consumer electronics device. Any (moderately easy) access they give for hackers would result in lots of end-users who aren't tech savvy doing Something Bad to their unit and having to return it.
I'm sure that if they made any internal changes to the kernel, they'd redistribute them to avoid an Open Source backlash. However, I'm equally sure the source changes would be 100% useless for the general Linux population, just like the TIVO modifications are.
Re:Suggested Retail Price (Score:1)
Re:What did they fix? (Score:1)
Quit wasting our bandwidth! (Score:1)
What's next - DoS attacks with "The Carpenters' Christmas Album"????
Re:Good quick cheap (Score:1)
--Now tell me what I'll have to do to let this thing access my MP3 archive!
Good
quick
cheap
soon.
choose three!
Re:Nice (Score:1)
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:1)
In a word, yes.
In lots more words, you have to remember that most of the things you list are sold to familys. My PC can play my CDs, let me play games, show TV etc, BUT only do one of them at a given time.
Re:This, they say, is where we're headed. (Score:2)
Yes, the general public really is that afraid of a general purpose computer. I prefer a desktop too, as to most other Slashdotters. We prefer the flexibility that it provides. However, there are a vast number of people that wish to benefit from the Internet, and yet are completely clueless and fearful of your standard workstation. Being uneducated is one thing, but the number of people who do not wish to educate themselves remains very large.
As a customer service representative for a large software company, I get clueless AOLers calling in everyday blaming us for the problems caused by their cluelessness regarding computers. I consider it a Good Thing that your average AOLer will likely be using a set-top box or a web pad in a couple of years. It leaves them with less room to screw things up. You might say that these devices won't encourage them to educate themselves about computers, but the fact is that they're not making any attempts to educate themselves as it is.
Re:Good quick cheap (Score:1)
Real Player G2 for Linux is available at ... (Score:1)
It is only available for Intel, but it works fine. It has a few annoying bugs but it is less annoying than the gaudy Windows version!
half-vga????? (Score:1)
Re:Mouse trail effect? (Score:1)
>paying a subscription service to listen to music.
Well, it runs Linux, doesn't it? Last time I checked it was still under the GPL. Couldn't we just hack it so that it gets its streams from yp.icecast.org or something like that????
Re:break out your slide rule genius (Score:1)
These kind of things is measured by the total amount of pixels.
You don't have to be a genius to know that if you cut both sides of a screen in half you get four parts.
Whats the point (Score:1)
KAOS (Score:1)
Re:Why would I buy such a thing? (Score:1)