DVD Forum Creates Further Confusion in RW 59
lymax writes "In a recent PCExtremist article they attack the DVD Forum for its further splintering of the already fragmented DVD recordable specs. - Interesting article. " Finally something on the subject that isn't about DeCSS. I still look forward to being able to use DVD-RW as a storage device. . . for that matter, putting
Duckpins and
Hamster Havoc on a Collectors Edition DVD would be super 'leet ;)
Duckpins and Hamster Havoc (Score:2)
You just gotta make a third one. C'mon, the other two were great!
Re:Duckpins and Hamster Havoc (Score:1)
the cynical reaction... (Score:1)
--
devedee (Score:3)
I've seen this story before... (Score:1)
What we REALLY need (Score:5)
I suspect that if some bright, cluefull outfit with a big research budget (maybe IBM?) were to bring out a 10Gbyte removable-media drive which wasn't too high priced, it would really sell. Once folks start keeping their home movies on these, using whatever format is handy, they'll sell like hotcakes. Once the hardware is out there, I think its just a matter of time before someone in the entertainment industry breaks ranks and starts selling their content on the new media. It might be old stooges movies, at first, but once someone starts making money there, the rest of the industry would have to follow, just as they've had to sell CD's even after CD-R's and MP3's came along.
So, we need to let it be known to manufacturers that we want really BIG removable-media drives, and we need to work on some open-source standard ways to put video on them, so us folks at home can lead the way.
Noooo! (Score:2)
In any case, this had all better be over by the time I get my DVD drive in 6 months. (I wanna use it under Linux so bad...)
Oh well, this will suck. The same thing happened with CD-ROMs, except the media pushers weren't this scared before. Even then, it took us forever to get ATAPI...
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [152.7.41.11].
DVD is great (Score:1)
R3Verse my ARS! (Score:1)
Yessss! (Score:3)
It would be really nice to have a drive that would hold gigabytes, and no nonsense about "its crippled and you'll go to jail if you fix it". I agree with you about too many standards, but I think we're already past the point of no return for the DVD. That article lists four major standards before this latest split, which seems (when I read between the lines) to be intended to keep us from making professional content. And that is what the DVD problems are all about: keeping the entertainment industry's stranglehold on distribution, as that felow Valenti argued so eloquently in the intervi ew [slashdot.org] earlier.
To ensure that prospective manufacturers aren't scared away by possible lawsuits, we should stay away from the movie industry's pet format. Think about the problems we're having getting cheap, portable MP3 players. They seem to come from fear of lawsuits, not just technical problems.
We wouldn't have to write new formats, unless we just weren't satisfied with the old. If we could just buy something like a Jazz disk that held 10 gigs for less than 20 bucks, we could use JPEG and MP3 or whatever to put stuff on it.
Re:devedee (Score:1)
Re:Yessss! (Score:1)
I also don't want the media to control the format, but people tend to naturally shy away from the proprietary solutions that cost them. And I know if it did, I'd hear about it on Slashdot first. I hope this whole stupid DeCSS thing blows over so I can watch The Matrix on my new computer.
...and look into ORB drives [castlewood.com]. I don't have one, but that's what I'd get, at the moment. At the moment, they're 2.2GB removable media, and I'm eagerly awaiting whatever the next generation of this technology will bring. Anyone who does have one want to share their experiences? I've heard it can be set up under Linux, maybe I'll buy one in a few months, or wait for something bigger.
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [152.7.41.11].
Re:Yessss! (Score:2)
Whew... reality setting in. Companies that spend the money to R&D these new formats want to recoup that money. Part of that is controlling your format, another is making your format useful for some market, be it the end user (Iomega zip & jazz) or content providers (CD & DVD's).
Doug
Hamster Havoc (Score:2)
Re:DVD is great (Score:1)
-ODB Jr.
Re:devedee (Score:1)
Re:Yessss! (Score:1)
What I was calling for was giving up on the many DVD standards entirely, and moving on to something without the artificial limits. That would be rough on the people who have bought them, but given the current legal climate, I fear that's where we'll have to go to get what DVD originally promised.
What I would really like to see is hobby directors putting movies on the web, small theatre groups putting their performances on the web, and so on, in the same format the big boys use. The current mess seems to rule that out. If we had an open standard which worked pretty well, the big boys could become irrelevant, just as cable and satelite made the big three networks shrink in importance.
Re:DVD is great (Score:1)
-Flerg
Re:What we REALLY need (Score:3)
There's just one problem with this; the media industry would still fight it tooth and nail. They're smart enough to recognize that data is data, and you can cram a movie onto a 10 GB non-DVD optical removable medium as easily as a 9.4 GB two layer DVD. And they have considerable means at their disposal to make life unpleasant for anyone who tries to break their hold.
For one very big thing, studios are already very tightly linked with a number of the biggest electronics manufacturers (i.e. Sony and Phillips), so that takes a number of possible players out right away. Second, they have considerable patent strength, which is going to make engineering something that doesn't infringe quite difficult.
Third, they have close enough to monopoly control in existing media (and big enough bank accounts) to try crushing any attempt to break their stranglehold. They have the motivation, too, because they're not just facing the loss of their electronics sales but also pre-recorded media. They would probably be willing to sell their crippled recording technology at a loss for quite a while to forestall that, particularly because it's going to make the next company that tries to break into the market very wary.
Re:Duckpins and Hamster Havoc (Score:1)
Don't know if I can get a duck that goes bowling though, maybe Andover or VA could come out with a Hamster Havoc and Duckpins (+ sequel!) DVD, along with assorted merchandise! How about it?
Re:Yessss! (Score:1)
Ultimatly, any technology will go commodity, and wind up cheap. If that never happens to Zip, it will be because Iomega stupidly allowed themselves to be superceded by a cheaper alternative.
Re:What we REALLY need (Score:1)
Well, the main reason that CD-ROM, CD-R, and CD-RW beat other optical storage formats is that you really can't fight the economies of scale of the millions audio CD players produced every year, not to mention the media manufacturing and pressing equipment, and so on..
In theory, DVD-ROM has the same advantages. However, if they continue to mung up the R and R/W formats, this may never be the case.
--
Incompatible Requirements (Score:2)
dvdrom on mac (Score:2)
The problem with Computer DVD - cost vs protection (Score:5)
If anything, the existing crop of DVD-ROM players show that the DVD consortium doesn't really understand computer peripherals and how to design them. Rather than choosing a 'closed' solution that would (in theory) be more difficult to crack, they cut corners and went for a software decryption/decoder approach, and then pushed the drives out into the market at very reasonable prices.
Software decoding has done wonders for DVD's installed base (mostly in computers right now), but at the same time it's left the more savvy users scratching their heads. Here is a stream of data coming across the IDE bus, bouncing around the hardware and the OS, and eventually displaying on the computer monitor. The one huge problem is that the users weren't supposed access that data, and if that isn't a giant scratchable itch, I don't know what is.
I can't stop wondering why they didn't just take the approach of CD-ROM players, which have normal audio-out leads right on the back of the drive. 99% of music CD listening is done through these leads and the sound card's analog mixer device. In fact, until a couple years ago, it was impossible to access the digital audio stream with most CD-ROMs, and people who ripped CDs generally did a analog-digital conversion with their SoundBlaster, resulting in a very noticeable quality loss.
Likewise, the same approach could have been taken with DVDs -- normal data access through IDE/SCSI, and just leave a S-Video connector on the back of the drive (along with a CD-ROM style audio hookup) for movie viewing. All the decryption and macrovision crap could be done completely in hardware. Of course, you would need a video 'mixer' device of some sort, but cheap TV cards have been available for some time, and are supported on all platforms. Any 'Rip' would require a D->A->D conversion.
Now, I'm not trying to give the studios advice on how to copy protect their movies, only trying to point out how short sighted they are. Any consumer writeable DVD format that come out will probably be designed just like DVD-Video was -- as much as possible will be done in software to reduce costs, and then a bunch of ill-thought out copy protection features will be kludged on at the end. Of course, you know the story from there on -- someone will want to scratch that itch and crack the whole thing open again, and then we are back to where we are now with DVD.
--
Re:Yessss! (Score:1)
Now the Jaz is 2.5 gigs for about $350 and we all have 18GB disks. Removable media just seems to keep falling further behind the storage sizes people expect.
--
Color me confused. (Score:3)
-----
Uhm, I'm having trouble reading this article (Score:1)
Re:dvdrom on mac (Score:2)
It's slowwww for use as normal removable media, but boy is it a sweet device for backup.
Re:The problem with Computer DVD - cost vs protect (Score:1)
Of course, I have digital audio outputs from my DVD player proper, and I would demand the same out of a DVD drive in a computer. I would also demand a digital output for my new digital television. Suddenly, the D->A->D conversion is no longer what it used to be.
The Big Picture... (Score:1)
The MPAA and what is happening to DVD is a prime example why big conglomerate companies are a BAD THING for the consumer. Remeber when SOny came out with BETAMAX?? At that time sony didn't own any media outlets.. so they didn't care what the big media outlets wanted.. they cared about what the CONSUMER wanted.
No Sony owns Studios, record companies etc etc... so now their primary concern is to protect those assets. Which is in conflict with what the consumer wants. Time Warner-AOL same deal. Remeber when AOL wanted open brodband/cable access to peoples PC (because they said it would benefit the consumer). Do you think they care now that they own TimeWarner and the RoadRunner cable service? I think NOT. (not that they cared in the 1st place.. but at least it would have been beneficial to the end user)
These big conglomorates simply can't be good for consumers because of major conflicting interests.
Re:I've seen this story before... (Score:4)
Actually, it's not DVD vs. Beta (both of which were successful for a time) as it is the usual "Sony does something, so Panasonic does something different" thing. Sony introduced their "Memory Stick", so Panasonic introduced their "SD Module". Why? Because they wanted to have something that was NOT Sony. Sony introduced the Mini-disc, Philips introduced the DCC (remember that?). Sony is as guilty. In the consumer video market, the DV format is universal and wel like. But in the Pro market, Sony came out with DVCAM, Panasonic came out with DVC-PRO, both with limited downward compatibility. The laughable part? Neither format is actually better quality...both are the same level of compression as the consumer product!
This is about each Japanese manufacturer and Philips trying to push their own format and make a huge pile from being the winner and licencing their format to the losers. What we need is a format that they can all agree on and put the patents into a pool.
Re:Color me confused. (Score:2)
MITI has been out of favor for the last several years, primarily because they didn't do what they were supposed to do: keep the Japanese economy booming, and keep beating up on the Americans. Thus, today MITI is in no position to leverage any of the Japanese corporations. Too bad, so sad.
The only loyalty I'm apt to have will be to the technology that I've already invested in -- a DVD player. If it won't read my existing DVD media, and write media that is compatible with my existing system components, I won't be buying it. As an individual user (even with too many computers to back up) I just don't need to backup gigabytes of data on a single disk. As an IT professional, I might have a different opinion, but none of the technology is anywhere close to affordable yet.
Well, you can have up to 8 IDE devices (4 controllers, 2 devices per controller) in a Wintel machine, presuming that your case is big enough, and your power supply is big enough. Don't worry; no doubt someone will figure another kludge to allow more than 8 IDE devices coexist.
Re:What we REALLY need (Score:2)
Re:devedee (Score:2)
---
Re:The problem with Computer DVD - cost vs protect (Score:2)
Well, if you look on the back of some CD-ROM drives made in years >=1994, you'll find, right beside the trusty AUDIO_OUT plug, an SPDIF plug. Until recently, SPDIF was the best way to transport digital music losslessly. There are some new schemes now for the hifi nuts... And you've got the "noticiable quality loss" part right--I've NEVER heard a CD-ROM with anything better than barely acceptable quality on the analog outs. Most are unusably bad. Everything from power supply noise to over-filtering the highs. Dont think about playing audio in realtime over the IDE cable, either (at least with any MICROS~1 OS) you'll hit "stop" in a hurry due to bursts of clicking (lost data? no error correction?). But then, how much can one expect from a CD player that costs under us$50?
Re:Noooo! (Score:1)
Question is, what sort of encryption/copy protection will we see on the new media? Will we see regions etc like DVD had, or will they drop it this time?
Re:The problem with Computer DVD - cost vs protect (Score:1)
Yes, but with early CD-ROM drives it was impossible to access the CD Audio data layer. I don't know if this was by design or not, but a DVD-ROM could be designed by our movie industry friends to hide the video bits from the IDE/SCSI bus.
Of course, I have digital audio outputs from my DVD player proper
All of this stuff has the MPAA's copy protection schemes built right into the hardware. It's certainly not the computer industry philosophy of pushing digital bits where ever you want.
--
Re:The problem with Computer DVD - cost vs protect (Score:3)
An audio CD reader has basically the reading and error correctin mechanism that provides a serial stream of bytes representing the audio data and a syncronyzation system. The serial data is then feed into the DAC. There are also sub channel informations but these are another serial stream normally sent to the microcontroller of the player and used to set indexes and so on.
The CD-ROM hardware of the first readers was built over the audio gear, taking the digital stream and sending on the SCSI bus.
The audio stream is basically serial, not random access, like an analog record. To fit into the idea of computer how work a data devices they addess in the CD-ROM stream marks with begin and end of block and block number information.
On audio CD there aren't such blocks(because audio is a serial stream).
So is explained why older CD-ROM had great difficulty to read audio data, not finding the block marks they normally are loosing syncronysm after few frames.
Newer CD are smarter and maybe can manage the sector syncronization before the ECC mechanism. The BMG not standard recording technique to prevent reading of their CD maybe garble the sector information before ECC, making more difficult for newer CD-ROM to remain in sync, and old CD-Audio players too, I think depend how ECC circutry manages errors on these units.
On DVD they started to a digital format and added video data as files.
Techically make a system like CD-Audio for CD video is more costly, because the data is compressed with a complex algorithm, requiring a powerful CPU, and not a simple DAC. But is feasible anyway (and useful, because you could see your favorite video on DVD even on a 486).
And MPEG compressed data has less self-correlation respect an uncompressed audio stream, making tools like cdda2wav less able do deal with loss of sync.
Mike
Re:The problem with Computer DVD - cost vs protect (Score:2)
(It's kinda like saying that writable DVD standards were developed after DVD-video -- technically true, but throughout the DVD development process everyone was fully aware of the computer applications. In fact, this standards war has in fact been brewing for years, and grew out of an earlier "Treaty of Versailles" that allowed a standard DVD format to ship in the first place.)
Anyway, thanks for the technical explanation. It just strikes me that the content/consumer electronic industry would be so stupid to produce something that looks like a computer drive, and acts like a computer drive, and then be amazed when the users want to use it like a computer drive. They should just stick to black boxes until they are ready to play the convergance game according to the existing rules.
--
DVD-RAM vs. DVD+RW (Score:1)
And kudos for NSA/FBI/etc. for that! (Score:3)
Consider the ideal copy protection. The data on the DVD is strongly encrypted. The player has some protected hardware which is able to access the encrypted media, and decrypt it. It never sends out the bits in clear text, though.
The display device (monitor, or maybe just the video card) also has protected hardware. The player and display negotiate a key (using a zero-knowledge protocol) and the data between them is exchanged encrypted using this key.
This means you can only play the media on a certified player and using a certified display device. You'll never have access to the unencrypted bits; sniffing the trafic between player and display device gives you nothing.
You can physically replicate the media, right, but a certified home writer would insist on taking unencrypted movies and encrypting them before writing to the media. No way you could replicate movies this way, but you could burn your own DVD of the last ski trip.
Everyone could build a factory which replicates media, but there's no helping that. This is a whole separate issue - it is more international politics then technical difficulties.
This does not prevent anyone from providing other forms of media (e.g., a large hard disk) which are large enough to store the movies. But you'll never be able to play a copy of an encrypted movie of such media; the data is encrypted and only a certified player will decrypt it. And no such player will read from a hard disk.
The up side is that you'd be able to play such media on Linux or other open-source systems. It is just a matter of drivers, all the encryption is in hardware. The down side is that you'll never be able to make a backup copy. Seems a perfect tradeoff for an industry which want to sell more movies then players...
So why don't they do it? Besides the cost of something like a smart card in both the player and the display device, that is?
Imagine a would-be terrorist in Iraq, burning a DVD with a video message to his partner in the USA. He just has to hook up his computer with the Panasonic player to the internet, and have it talk with his partner's computer with the Diamond display card. Instant secure communication. And that's before considering him taking apart the players and using the smart cards directly...
This keeps the NSA awake at nights. Of course, the possibility that the same terrorist would use PGP instead doesn't cross their minds. Sigh.
Thanks to such far sightedness, we get both PGP to encrypt our E-mails and DVDs with encryption which one must break to play on Linux (which seems fair use under current law) - hence, in effect, no encryption at all. So we have secure E-mail and can make backup copies of our DVDs. The best of all possible worlds! (Given a favorable court ruling, that is).
One day they'll notice the HDTV spec requires broadcasting the movies in unencrypted digital format which puts DVDs to shame. Imagine a TiVo like system for HDTV... The fuss they make over DeCss would be mild by comparison. Why do you think they flatly refuse to define a standard for sending HDTV over cable?
I know, I'm giving the "bad guys" ideas, so I'd better stop now
Re:Yessss! (Score:1)
Re:I've seen this story before... (Score:1)
Offtopic, sorry
Re:What we REALLY need (Score:1)
Yes, the studios and record companies will fight it, but how do you fight harddrives? It will be pretty tough to paint Ma and Pa as evil hacker pirates for buying one of these hypothetical "giant floppies" to store movies of the grandkids. I really think that once we have the media, the content will follow. Why do we put music on CD's? Because storing an hour of music on magnetic media in that data format would cost too much, not because there is something magic about optical media.
Think about the sort of content that will become possible in the near future. As 64bit machines become affordable and common, animation via ray-tracing will become possible for the really dedicated hobbyist. Eventually artists will ba able to do anime as easily as comic books. An amateur theatre company with a good graphics editor will be able to mix their performances with special effects, as in Who Framed Roger Rabbit. I think that once these giant floppies become cheap enough, there will be plenty of content on them, and the big studios will become a lot less relevant.
Re:Yessss! (Score:1)
Re:I've seen this story before... (Score:1)
So, it sounds like copyright mafia is at it again.
robjob
Re:Enough! (Score:1)
Troll? Yes.
Flame-bait? Yes.
Redundant? Yes.
Offtopic?
If you're going to moderate me down for that, at least get the fucking reason right.
Suppose confusion might have been caused by my lack of clarity. Should have read 'I'm going to completely ignore DVDs in all their incarnations until they've settled down into a single open standard that everyone's using.' to completely remove misconceptions.
Sigh, I suppose this'll get moderated down now for Trolling as well, when there are so many more blatant real trolls out there who could use a -1 much more.
K.
End of IDE? (Score:1)
(I presume you mean IDE. ISA is already dead)
Mobo makers will keep adding more IDE ports. My current mobo has two "classic" IDE ports (four devices) plus two UDMA/66 ports (four more devices). Windows 98 seems to think that the UDMA ports are "SCSI" devices. Whatever. The drive I have there works. It boots, then the 4 other devices on the classic IDE ports come in at higher drive letters.
I'm thinking of replacing my 1.2G drive E with a stock CD, though. My DVD cannot read CDR, meaning that I cannot "photocopy" CDR's. I can only do first-generation copies. As you say, it starts getting heavy to bring to the LAN parties.