Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Connectix Considering Open Sourcing VGS? 92

Araquel writes, "MacOS Rumors is reporting that Connectix is considering releasing an Open Source Linux version of its Virtual Game Station product (VGS is a PlayStation emulator for Macs). MacOS Rumors is calling for people to e-mail Connectix, requesting that they actually release the source code."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Connectix Considering Open Sourcing VGS?

Comments Filter:
  • That's one way to piss off Sony...

  • Could that be the killer app? Having the entire library of Playstation games available on a linux box would be excellent!

    And on top of that, it would make an entirely free way to play playstation games. You would not have to purchase a piece of software like "bleem" to play your playstation games.

    In fact, if it were bundled with a distribution of RedHat or similar, you would have a linux computer with thousands of available games!!!

    This is sounding better and better the more I think about it.
  • Sounds like a leak by them to see how receptive the community might be to that. MacOS Rumors has something of a reputation for, uhh.. publishing rumors. Not like they used to, now it's just rumors anyone can start (Hey, I heard transmeta is teaming up with compaq to use their bus technology and aquire their RISC engineering team!)...

    I think it's a leak, and shame on you Rob for posting something from MacOS rumors - their reputation is... questionable..


  • I'm all for this but didn't we go though something like this with Loki and Blizzard and the fact that emailing is interperted as spam? How about snail-mailing them?
  • Yeah, lets see, why don't they take a piece of money making software and give the source code to people who can do whatever they want with it. Realistically how many of you think Connectix cares if we want the source code, and would actually give it to us?
  • by webslacker ( 15723 ) on Friday February 18, 2000 @10:56AM (#1261110)
    They mixed up the VGS/VPC thing just like the guy who sent in that last Connectix story to Slashdot. MacOS Rumors does not have any knowledgable sources except for the stuff they swipe off the front page of AppleInsider, and even that's wrong half the time. They're the Apple equivalent of the Weekly World News, they post anything and everything that gets emailed to them, including obvious pranks and fake rumors.
  • The biggest problem I have is that my Riva TNT2 doesn't have a good driver in Linux. Without the graphics end, I'm limited in all sorts of 3D games.

    What I'm praying now is for Micro$oft to release DirectX source under the GPL...

  • For the mac there's <a href="http://www.emuhq.com/psmac">PSMac</a> and for linux there's <a href="http://www.emuhq.com/sope">Sope</a>. For the PC there's FPSE but I haven't the link on me. None of them are too far aloung but all are promising with more developers. Especially FPSE since he's working to HLE the bios also.
    -Corey O'Connor
  • by um... Lucas ( 13147 ) on Friday February 18, 2000 @11:00AM (#1261113) Journal
    Either it's complete spoof, or Connectix is looking to the open source community to provide them legal protection, just as it's been trying to do with DeCSS...

    I'll be really sad if connectix does this. They spent quite a long time developing this peice of software, withstood the first of two lawsuits standing, and are basically about to throw the money they could have earned to the wind...

    Of course the 2nd lawsuit is a patent case, so maybe they know they've violated some patents... In which case, again, OSS seems to be the savior for projects which are dependant on other companies patents.

    If their product is legit, they should keep it for themselves and make some money. If it's not, then it certainly shouldn't be open sourced. It'll just tarnish the whole OSS movements repuatation.

    And don't anyone tell me they can earn money from it after open sourcing it... Maybe they can, but not enough to offset their costs... Open source software sells (when it does) for multitudes of times cheaper than commercial software. It's all fine and dandy for programmers with day jobs, but i don't think it meshes well with a company's economics, bills, and shareholders.
  • mac os rumors is basically...well crap. this isnt a troll, its the truth. ryan (the owner) makes stuff. dont fall for his news....show
    some integrity

    I had to respond.

    Yes MOSR is a _RUMORS_ site. Sometimes they print the truth, sometimes they don't. Sometimes it is
    painfully obvious that they don't understand what their sources are saying.

    However, I think it is very disingenious to claim that they make stuff up with out proof. Say what you want if you have some proof to back it up, but they are pretty accurate about somethings (earnings reports, they hit some of the recent consumer stuff right on the head and so on).

    About this specific rumor:With the recent accounement about VPC, I wouldn't be suprised if you saw a binary-only distibution with in the next year. However, i doubt that connectix is truely cool enough to open source it, especially with all the $$$ they invested to fight of the Empire err... I mean Sony.
  • That's what you get for not having a T1 to the house. ;-)
    Maybe now you'll listen when all your geek friends tell you not to buy something.

    CSG_SurferDude
    Wasting time at work again!
  • why don't they take a piece of money making software and give the source code to people who can do whatever they want with it
    Like DVD encryption? Interesting thought.
    Yes, DVD-encryption is money-making. It makes money for the manufacturers. Don't flame me for being on 'their' side, or an enemy of open-source, but I thought I'd point out the parallel.
    -Ravagin
    "Ladies and gentlemen, this is NPR! And that means....it's time for a drum solo!"
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 18, 2000 @11:06AM (#1261117)
    (obligatory counterproductive moderation comment here)

    This is absolutely 100% not true in any way, shape, or form. MacOSRumors is well-known among people with functioning neurons for outright fabrication of information; in this case, the 'kernel of truth' they built this story around is the erroneous 'Connectix is bundling VGS with Red Hat' story posted here on /. earlier this week. As we all know now, that story was completely misreported; it was Connectix which was bundling Red Hat with their Virtual PC emulation software for the Mac. (Okay, so calling it 'Virtual PC *for* Red Hat Linux' isn't the best idea, but...)

    Connectix is not on record as stating a Linux port, open or otherwise, is in the cards; as of now, the only non-Mac port is slated to be to Win9x.

    C'mon! After having already had one bogus Connectix/VGS story in a week, you'd think a little bit of verification work would have been done! This is a new low... Slashdot's gone and trollerized itself!
  • by jesser ( 77961 ) on Friday February 18, 2000 @11:10AM (#1261119) Homepage Journal
    Take a look at the Legal section [virtualgamestation.com] of the Virtual Game Station FAQ. VGS impliments several copy-protection schemes that seem to emulate the Playstation's copy-protection schemes.

    Also, look at the "international" section of the FAQ (right below the "legal" section), which talks about the geographic-region encoding.

    --

  • Have you noticed lately the horde of rumors permeating the internet lately: Bill Gates giving away Windows source,... and now this.

    I'm not sure who starts these rumors, but that is exactly what they are, just rumors.

    I wonder if they are somehow related to the recent DDOS attacks??

    I think we're on to something here...

    Ok, enough BSing. My point is that Slashdot should try to post slightly more credible stories and news. In other words research it a little before posting every little comment from some loony that comes along on the grape vine or is deposited in their "make a comment" bin. When we post this kind of garbage it only serves to weaken our credibility.

    Just my two cents...


    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    NPS Internet Solutions, LLC
    www.npsis.com [npsis.com]
  • it will be Sony. Software will be nice, but Sony makes the hardware. They've been bringing the cost down for years now - they can spit out those chips like popcorn.

    Furthermore, the PS2 development box runs Linux on the Emotion Engine. Consider a Linux box running an Emotion Engine (and yes, that port is long since completed and works just fine), with a complete set of PS/PS2 graphics and sound chips, and the drivers to go with them. If that doesn't make you drool, it should. With a top-flight, pre-configured (i.e., easy to use) desktop, that would be the Linux box for the masses.

    This might even address Judge Jackson's "application barrier to entry," at least somewhat. Out of the box there'd be the thousands of PS and PS2 titles, and all the Linux ones too. Zoomba.

    Of course, the PS2 development box also writes DVDs - so much for DeCSS :-)

  • Just so you know, MacInTouch hasn't posted anything about this rumor, let alone request folks email Connectix.

    BTW, MacOS Rumors hasn't had a good rumor since the pre-Jobs-returns days. I do know BlackLightMedia (one of the several companies MOSR has created) used to handle the ads for Slashdot. Maybe Rob likes sending much needed traffic to an old friend?

  • Given that a few previous posts suggest that this story isn't even true, I doubt its a good idea to start emailing the company. Especially considering the problems that has caused in the past. I also would never want to take a third party's advice about emailing the company. Unless the company has set up a special email account for this purpose, it will probably just irritate them.

  • by Shaheen ( 313 ) on Friday February 18, 2000 @11:18AM (#1261124) Homepage
    Here's another emulator story (which I submitted, but got rejected... I think the /. authors don't like me)

    Someone has created a Dreamcast VMU (Visual Memory Unit) emulator [tidalwave.net]. I believe that he has even been able to get a program he made with it to download to the VMU and play a mini-game he made himself. It may not be a Dreamcast emulator, but it's a start.

    Also, there's a few pages geared toward accelerating Dreamcast emulator development here [consoledev.com] and here [mangakai.org].
  • What is with slashdot and all the rumors lately? I come here for news not speculation. This is quickly turning into a rumor discussion forum. Is there not enough tech news to go around that they have to make up news? We do a lot of bashing on the "sensationalist" media here, and now this site is becoming sensationalized.

    I realize slashdot and Macosrumors used to be (or still are?) affiliated with each other, but the slogan says News for Nerds not fun possible stories that might be coming in the tech industry...
  • Now, where are the high scores for negative karma?
  • OMG! This is incredible! They are actually considering open sourcing it! I'm breathless!

    In reality... this is so stupid. Wasn't there a story earlier today about how Microsoft is considering releasing the source for Windows? So what? And there was a story yesterday about a new dev kernel being release? Who cares? These stories are so pointless. Where exactally is the "stuff that matters" A company considering releasing the source for a product isn't really news, and it certainly isn't stuff that matters. Get over it.

  • Last time I checked, the VPC came with an OEM version of Windows 98. Check here [connectix.com].

    --

  • This question is beyond my abilities, but I wonder how difficult it would be to do an open-source version of VGS.

  • MOSR is good every once in a while. But it's a rumor site; people here seem to be forgetting that. The name alone tells you to take everything on that page with a grain of salt, if not the whole shaker.

    No, MOSR isn't very accurate. But they don't claim to be. Look at the name, for crying out loud.
  • Someone moderate this anti /. parent down! Squash the indignant!


    If an infinite number of monkeys typed at an infinte number of
  • MOSR appears to be run by habitual liars. From my personal experience they're about a third as accurate as the rumor sites in their market (Apple and Macintosh related whisperings)... and rumour sites aren't that accurate to begin with. Why does slashdot somewhat frequently post stuff from MOSR but not the more credible Mac news sites (more ofen.. they do sometimes)? As for OpenSourcing VGS... seems like it could be beneficial, though I don't know if it'd ever happen. VGS is the best PlayStation emulator I've run on my G3 and having that out there would be nice... it'd also be a slap in face to SONY. SONY needs a *Slap*>
  • It is very likely that in order for this company to release this emulator to the public, they will have to put copy protection on it to prevent copied cds to work in it.. only the original sony distributions.

    LW

  • What I'm praying now is for Micro$oft to release DirectX source under the GPL...

    The chances of that are about the same as God on High coming down and coding it for you Himself. So I guess praying is the appropriate action to take...

    --
  • Taking into consideration Rob's mispost just the other day regarding VPC shipping with Red Hat, who's to say that MacOSRumors, a site of questionable accuracy at best. Not to say that it's wrong, but it's a rumor site, with next to no basis in reality on many occasions. For all we know, the only reason this was posted was because someone read the unedited /. post, started thinking about what it meant, and *poof* we now think we have Open Source VGS for Linux.

    If this is the case, and it keeps up, you realize what we get next? Mac OS X is running Linux for the backend, not BSD, but the Linux core is actually running under VPC, on OS 9... yeah... that's it... and of course it'll get worse, but I'll be really frightened when that happens.
    Christopher Kalos
  • And, is there a high score list for negative karma?
  • While I realize this story is most likely not true (see the post that's moderated up at the top, I doubt anything will replace it), if it were true, everyones reaction who knows anything at all about emulators should be saying "Well, duh". There are probably not a handful of closed source emulators, but there are hundreds and hundreds of open source ones.

    Being surprised at this would be like being surprised at a roguelike being open-sourced.

    The emulation community is a good example of what *REALLY* happens with open source stuff. Linux is really a big freak in the open source world, 99% of other open source projects release their code to no avail and are never improved upon and their code is never used to create variant software. One emulator, SNES9x, was railed against for having closed source. Everyone shouted that as soon as the source was released, the pieces of the SNES that were not emulated yet would be within days. The source code has been released for around 2 years now and no one has modified it save the 2 original authors. It's a perfect example of what happens in most open source projects, there is an element of risk thrown in with open sourcing your software. Sure, all bugs are shallow with enough eyes, but wheres the guarantee those eyes will show up or that people more competent in the subject than the original authors won't want to start over from scratch and do it themselves? More often the latter happens than anything else. They see someone did something cool and decides to do it themselves in a different way and they improve on it in that way... same thing that happens in the closed source world.

    Esperandi
  • Like many others posted below, I will have to add on to it. Ryan Meader's attempt to predict the latest Mac industry rumors are usually never true. The VGS post was just based on a post made to Slashdot a few days ago concerning Linux and VGS coming from Connectix (which was later updated to be a miscommunication). MacOS Rumors just took this information and made up a whole story about it.
  • If they had released a version of their software which played copied playstation games, they would have absolutely no chance in hell of ever winning a court case. Right now they're fighting a court case almost exactly the same as DeCSS. Sony makes a proprietary player, these guys have developed a better player (it IS better than a PSX because you can run at higher resolutions than a TV can handle). Sony is arguing patent infringments, but they've lost this court case before to the people who make Bleem!, a PSX emulator for the PC. Both of these products can survive as long as they implement the copy procedures.

    Just because they're not complete dirtbags hell-bent on letting people play burned PSX CDs doesn't mean they won't release it open source. Not everyone gets into open source so that they can get software for free.

    Esperandi
  • You'd still have to buy the games. And if you get someone to hack the code for you to remove the copy protection, you will do a great deal of harm all the way around. To Sony, to game companies, to Connectix, and to the open source movement.

    Even if the idea of pirating every PSX game you can imagine makes you jiggle like Captain Kirk with a tribble down his pants, you should keep that private, it makes you look like a bottom feeder.

    Esperandi
  • by rodgerd ( 402 )

    Why on earth would Connectix open source a profitable application when they've never shown any interest in doing so before? What would be the point?

    About the only possible kernel of truth I could see in this would be if they lose the law suit, and "accidentally" released the source so as to spit in Sony's eye.

  • The MacOSRumors story is based on the bogus story posted on Slashdot a few days ago about VGS being bundled with RedHat. That story turned out to be wrong, but that didn't stop MacOSRumors from picking up on it as though it were true! As a side note, why on Earth do people assume that if a software company makes a Linux version of their product that it *must* be open source? There can be closed-source, commercial software for Linux. Just because someone is making a Linux version of their software doesn't mean they have to give up selling it!
  • They went to press with quite a few stories about "Microsoft to port Windows 98 to Macs".

    I highly doubt there was any evidence for this what-so-ever, besides anonymous coward e-mails pulling their chain.

    Furthermore, they seem totally unaware that:
    A) Windows 98 has enough x86 assembly that it's pretty much non-portable as it stands.
    B) Microsoft had already ported Windows NT to PowerPC -- the lack of Mac support was purely a political issue.

    These guys are total clowns -- Note how they post a story, Slashdot links to it, and then they post the Slashdot link as "confirmation" of their story. WTF?

    If anything, their site is a good way to check what misinformation Apple is spreading (Settop box prototypes right before the iMac launch, for example. Whoops -- if they had acutally be reading their own rumors, they would realize that the settop box was the well known and cancelled Pippen project.) What reliable information they do print, they get from other sites such as www.appleinsider.com.

    --
  • MOSR probably submits all these wacky stories so that they get Slashdotted and their hits go up. This [mosr.net] is a MacOSrumors spoof site, it's quite funny. Take a look at the slide show [mosr.net] to see the mastermind behind the BLM Media empire.

    Also, I remember there used to be some kind of partnership between BLM and Slashdot, several years ago. Can anybody provide more info? What was lowly Ryan Meader's role in the creation of Slashdot? This is going back at least 2 years.

    The only proof I can find (other than my memory of a mention of BLM on Slashdot a couple of years ago) is this page [8m.com], which has a capture of a MOSR page from December, 1998. Look down at the bottom, it says "For those who don't follow the development of Linux (for those interested, Slashdot is an excellent place for all manner of geek news -- not that we're exactly totally unbiased, as Slashdot is a BLM partner)".

    Anybody know anything about this? Maybe this has something to do with the recent stories from MOSR being posted lately... maybe Rob feels bad for Meader, whose site does nowhere near this much traffic. But then again... [lowendmac.net] (funny).

    _________________

  • Haha ;-)

    So MacOS Rumors is basically playing the Telephone Game with itself?
    --
    Ski-U-Mah!
    Stop the MPAA [opendvd.org]
  • What really wound up happening, BTW, is that Connectix is selling a version of Virtual PC (the PC emulator for Mac) with RedHat preinstalled.

    Connectix Press Release [connectix.com]
  • i don't think he meant it in that way, to pirate psx games. yes, the potential is very much there, but its there with bleem, too. i don't know about connectix's software, but i know very well that bleem allows you to play burned psx games. also, he was referring to a free way to play psx games, which is not necessarily synonymous with a free way to obtain psx games.
    and his "This is sounding better and better the more I think about it" comment was just that ... he was saying it was sounding better. most people i know who have something against linux is its lack of game support. with a freeware (as in free beer, in most cases ... although free speech (OSS) would include that) application such as this distributed with major linux distro's, those people would have much less to complain about, as their new copy of redhat or slak or whatever would have a support base of hundreds (he said thousands, but i dunno honestly how many psx games there are) games, negating the excuse of "no games"

    and i'm gonna apologize for my poor grammar/caps/run-on sentences, because i write how i talk, and i don't capitalize in speech, and people speak in run-on's (even phd english doctors, in my experience)

  • I think you might have misunderstood his comment. i don't see anything that implies piracy. He's just saying that there would be a large library of games available, unlike the rather modest selection right now.
    treke
  • Emulating is not rocket science you dildo. I honestly doubt it took a lot of work to get it done.

    I'm sick and tired of this software is hard crap. No Barbie software is easy.

    Plus given the fact they didn't have the Sony owned libraries to work with in the first place, they didn't have to reinvent the whole damn thing probably not even half of it. There's plenty of replacement libraries all over the net.

    How do you people fall for all this hype?

    It's not rocket science. It took no more than a couple of weeks to Port Linux and BSD to the DreamCast not that's to port a whole kernel to a an rchitecture not just interface the architecture which uis all you really have to do to emulatre an asrch. I mean let's suppose a library that does the same work as the the hardware beats the fuck out of the Sony hardware when it's designed for the PC? Why the fuck would anyone do a true blue emulation if there's better ways. And it's not hard to get things to work perfectly. Take up some coding classes before you go paranoid like that.

    Finally,

    Open source software sells (when it does) It sells period.
    for multitudes of times cheaper than commercial software

    Bull fucking shit.
  • A quick search of hotbot turned this up: http://www.internetn ews.com/IAR/article/0,1087,12_3981,00.html [internetnews.com]
    Slashdot Signs with Black Light Media April 9, 1998


    By the InternetNews.com Staff Advertising Report Archives
    Black Light Media in Portland, ME said alternative Web site Slashdot has signed on for advertising sales, ad management, promotions, and public relations. Billings were not disclosed.
    "Slashdot will significantly enhance BLM's ability to reach a diverse and tightly targetable audience for our advertising clients," said Ryan Meader, president of Black Light. "We believe that Slashdot is becoming a major player in the Linux and Open Software News markets."
    Slashdot, "News for Nerds on the Stuff that Matters," is an alternative site catering to power users on the cutting edge of the computing industry--specifically, people interested in Open Source Software and mainstream (or not-so-mainstream) technology.
    Black Light Media clients include Mac OS Rumors, InterWeather, Snoot, ClickWorld, and others.

    "Alternative Web site." Boy, if Meader hadn't lost Slashdot he'd be a happy man now...

    Anyway, this seems to answer my question.

    _________________

  • you managed to phrase my long-winded point much more concisely ... kudos
    and not redundant, because we posted on the same minute (yes i noticed that, so i'm not criticizing you at all, either)
  • by steak ( 145650 )
    i like playstation playstation good my dogs breath smells bad
  • "An old friend familiar with operations at Connectix recently confirmed for Rumors the existence of an open-source Linux version of their popular Virtual GameStation product. "

    You gotta wonder about MacOS Rumors when they don't even understand what 'Open Source' means. If it was truly an Open Source product, we wouldn't be sitting around here talking about it...we'd have it.
  • There are 3 versions (currently) of VPC3. Win95, Win98, and PC-DOS. I got the DOS version because you don't have to pay the Windows tax, and because I already have Win98. I installed RedHat on a VPC disk image and it ran well, though extremely slow (G3 333, 192 MB).

    Connectix will be shipping a version with RedHat preinstalled soon. Someone below linked to the press release.

    _________________

  • by TheGreek ( 2403 ) on Friday February 18, 2000 @01:44PM (#1261164)
    Maybe Rob likes sending much needed traffic to an old friend?

    As a former BLM "employee" (read: Ryan's bitch for nine months), I had the wonderful joy of watching him work. He greatly overstates the amount of email he receives. He makes stuff up out of whole cloth. I HAVE SEEN HIM DO THIS. I once said "Wouldn't it be neat if Apple did x?" About an hour or so later, I read on Rumors that "reliable sources" had informed him that Apple was indeed planning to do x.

    I was also around during the time when /. and BLM parted ways. It was a Very Big Deal, and not amicable for either party. (Hint: It was near mid-April 1999. What happens in the middle of April? Bingo. Ryan lost all of BLM's financial data in his Hard Drive Crash of December 1998. He kept no backups. Smart guy.)

    Additonally, BLM's "business model" changed no less than four times during the nine months I was there, and has changed a couple of times since. I came to the office for "strategy sessions" which consisted of him rambling about wanting to finance research to facilitate leisure space travel for about five minutes before retiring to his desk to smoke a bowl and play Quake. Working for a company that would rather buy illicit substances than pay its employees instills such a wonderful sense of morale.

    Indeed, Ryan Meader's sole skill appears to be getting people to do work for him for free until they finally realize what he's doing to them. There are no less than five people (which basically comprises most of BLM's non-Ryan and non-Sarah entire core workforce throughout its existence) that have been burned by him within the past eighteen months.

    This is being posted non-anonymously for two reasons. Firstly, I hope it lends some sort of credibility to my statements, as it is indeed all true. Secondly, I don't really give a flying fuck what Ryan has to say or do about it.

  • Boy, if Meader hadn't lost Slashdot he'd be a happy man now...

    Yes. Read this [slashdot.org] for more info surrounding the circumstances of the parting of BLM and /.

  • ok, i think i know what happened.

    last week at macworld tokyo, connectix announced that they would start selling virtualpc (_not_ virtual game station, this is a product that emulates intel on a mac) that bundled redhat for linux. i'm not sure why they're bothering with this, as linuxppc works just dandy and uses a redhat base, and connectix is charging the same $ for it as they're charging for the dos version, but anyway....

    a couple days later, someone at /. saw this, misinterpreted this as saying that _vgs_ is coming to redhat. this was almost immediately updated, saying that no, this story was totally false, the product of much crack-smoking.

    that day, macosrumors saw the /. story, ignored the update saying it was false, and decided that this meant that connectix was considering open sourceing vgs. again,this is a false story based on a false /. story.

    now /. seems to have seen the macosrumors story, didn't check the facts (or references), and now we're seeing this, a false /. story based on a false macosrumors story that was based on a false /. story. whee!

    therefore, i would now like to present both slashdot and macosrumors both the pulitzer prize and the newberry award for fictitious journalism.
  • The article I found said that the BLM/Slashdot partnership STARTED in mid-april '98, but in the comment you linked to, you say they broke it off at mid-april...?

    _________________

  • OK, I've put together a theory on how this rumor ballooned so wildly out of proportion, so read below if you want my idea. ;-)

    Slashdot posted an article that mixed up Connectix's plan to bundle Redhat with their emulator Virtual PC [connectix.com] (VPC) with Connectix's Macintosh-only Virtual Game Station [virtualgamestation.com] (VGS). Before an update could be posted to explain the confusion, MOSR's [macosrumors.com] prestigious Ryan Meader saw the post. Using his common tactics for obtaining information for MOSR, he stole the incorrect information and embellished it with his own lies. (If anyone is feeling like I personally don't believe anything MOSR says, you're right. Please check the archives at http://www.mosr.net/ [mosr.net] (the site is now defunct, but as I said, check the archives) if you want to see some very good rebuttals of pure crap/stolen news Ryan has posted.) Anyway, a Slashdot reader who read MOSR saw the story, which corroborated the incorrect story he saw earlier (perhaps he had not reloaded Slashdot to see the update yet) and so he submitted it. It was picked up as a story again at Slashdot because it appeared to lend credence to that same story that was (mistakenly) posted the day before.

    Sadly people have submitted MOSR topics before to Slashdot. I would recommend that people don't submit MOSR topics, as well as advising Slashdot that they shouldn't pick up stories like that. ;) Hopefully this will be avoided in the future!

    Oh yeah, remember that this is merely a theory, although from my point of view it does seem very likely. :)
  • The article I found said that the BLM/Slashdot partnership STARTED in mid-april '98, but in the comment you linked to, you say they broke it off at mid-april...?

    Mid-April 1999. Fun month. Ryan sent the /. guys a 13.3"/233 PowerBook G3 (the one he got in July '98 to take to MWNY that year) to try to stop the partnership's hemorrhaging, but they didn't buy it and sent it back, so, in lieu of yet more payment, he gave the fucker to me. It's currently sitting on my desk with a half-broken LCD, broken headphone jack, and a left media bay that won't take a battery to save its life.

  • Looking through this thread, I see that somewheres around 100% of the posters say something like "Oh no, not another MOSR post! This is total disinformation!"
    There's next to no discussion of open-source software, emulators, Bleem, or anything that this article was supposed to start discussion of. Instead, the crowd is getting hostile at Rob and Ryan, proposing conspiracy theories. If Rob knows what's good for himself at this point, he'll back away from mosr.com and stay away.
    Not only is Ryan Meader getting a few thousand additional hits, there are a few thousand people more who know he's a lying bastard. He'll be run out of his job.
    In the meantime, the small industry of parodying him is doing great...

    Where is my mind?
    mfspr r3, pc / lvxl v0, 0, r3 / li r0, 16 / stvxl v0, r3, r0
  • I don't know if the rumors are true or not, but it probably wont make a big difference either way. Most businesses that use Linux wouldn't have much interest in Sony's kid games; afterall businesses use productivity apps like 'Doom' and 'Quake' :-)
  • MOSR obviously has not the best reputation, but they're much more reliable than most people seem to think.

    No. I refer you here [slashdot.org] for a straightforward rundown of Ryan's reliability.

    I read slashdot cuz it's not just about linux anymore... but mosr has nothing to do with linux.

    Not exactly true. Ryan was pretty friendly with Jason Haas of LinuxPPC, Inc. for a while and tried to bamboozle him into some strategic partnership. Then there's the fact that Ryan thought that Linux was Hot Shit until he caught wind that Mac OS X had a BSD layer that was derived from FreeBSD 3.2, at which point he, without consulting his then-sysadmin/bitchslave (me), DECREED that BLM's LIVE PRODUCTION SERVERS (oh wait, there was only one left by then--the power supply in the other exploded and he didn't feel like paying to get the computer fixed) would be switched over to FreeBSD early one Sunday Morning, despite the fact that I had informed him beforehand that I had absolutely no FreeBSD experience, and neither did anybody on his pay^H^H^Hwork-for-free-roll. What a fucking genious.

    Even though they probably have no idea of MOSR's track record.

    Please see above.

  • I realize slashdot and Macosrumors used to be (or still are?) affiliated with each other...

    That's news to me.
    --
    Michael Sims-michael at slashdot.org

  • mosr's story is a backwards version of the REAL story. the register reported that connectix is bundling redhat with their virtual pc (or whatever it is) x86 emulator. for a good laugh, read mosr from time to time. when the 500mhz g4 bug was news, they claimed that all that had to be done was to run them at 499mhz instead. anyone with a clue knows that running it at 499.999999999999mhz is not going to make it run fine. mosr apparently didn't understand that 500mhz is an approximate value and thought that 500 was some sort of magical number that causes the bug, as soon as you hit 500. i nearly fell out of my chair, laughing, when i read that mosr story. mosr isn't exactly into fact checking.
  • I guess I took him on his word when he said:
    "And on top of that, it would make an entirely free way to play playstation games. "

    I didn't parse that as "And on top of that, it would make an entirely free way to spend $60 on playstation games and then play them!"

    Esperandi
    But I'm certain he will claim that he would never think of pirating PSX games.
  • You're right, the DMCA doesn't say that. The original lawsuit against Bleem! was not in reference to the DMCA. It was basically saying that Sony would lose all kinds of software revenue because of illegal use.

    Think back to the Rio case, this issue is similar. the *ONLY* reason that the Rio is legal is because it "couldn't" be used to distribute MP3s (the software has since been hacked and now it can, but this is not Diamond's fault or legal responsibility). This is kinda the same thing. You can compete with Sony, but only if you're going to compete with them fairly. Offer a similar product that doesn't infringe on other peoples rights and such. being able to play copied games (and there are thousands flying around the net) would make this like another mod chip lawsuit. One side claims that its for playing japanese games, Sony claims its to play copied games (it is). I don't know who won that one, but the courts are almost never on the side of emulators so I wouldn't tempt them.

    Esperandi
  • Yeah, reverse engineering is explcitly legal as spelled out in the DMCA, old news. But the court case going on now is about patent infringement. People don't seem to be realizing that it doesn't matter if you come to the same conclusion separately, if they're copyrighted the process, you have to change yours or get some nice fines and maybe prison time...

    Esperandi
    You can't patent ideas or concepts, only very very specific designs... being as the Connectix product is software and everything in the PSX is hard ware I don't see how patent law would apply, but I guess the courts will show.
  • what a waste of a moderation point.
  • Hardware-wise they are pretty similar (cut down PMac 6100). I don't know about software, but I'd be pretty shocked if the settop box was all that different than the web interface the Pippen shipped with.
    --
  • Well... Virtual Play Station or whatever it's name is, was written mostly in PowerPC ASSEMBLY language... That takes some doing... No C. No C++. Assembly.

The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much.

Working...