LinSight Shuts Down 25
There's been much rumbling, but it looks official: LinSight and LinDeveloper (the
sites operated by Dave Whitiger and Atipa have shut down. They decided that it wasn't an efficient use of resources... on the positive side,
LinEvents (a Linux Events calendar which was the most useful part of the site) will continue.
No word on what Dave's gonna do now, but somehow I don't think he'll return to LinuxToday ;)
LinTraining still online (Score:1)
Dave's great site of training companies that are available to teach Linux, LinTraining, is still online at http://www.lintraining.com [lintraining.com].
So that resource is still available along with LinEvents [linevents.com].
(I should state that I've also helped Dave out with LinTraining, so my opinion may be biased :-)
Re:Atipa bothers me. (Score:1)
Re:Inevitable, and not necessarily bad (Score:1)
as an interesting side note. originally the pilsbury doe boy was going to be used instead of the "malburo man." but then they decided they found out that it would be better if he endorsed cake mixes instead.
and the rest, as they say, is history.
Too many Linux sites anyway (Score:4)
Why doesn't Andover buy the rest of them anyway? I want all my information from a media conglomerate damnit!
Newsflash (Score:1)
"Geocities page about Linux contains dead links and broken image"
"Newsgroup postings on linux expire"
C'mon websites go down all the time. No big deal.
Inevitable, and not necessarily bad (Score:1)
Yeah, as much as I hate to say this and all, but it was fairly inevitable that a lot of the Linux bandwagon sites will close. After all, even in the growing open source market there's only room for so many sites - people can only read X sites per day, and they tend to stick with what they know.
A lot of the sites that have started up recently will probably die over the next year or so as their authors either lose interest or no longer have the time to update them.
This isn't necessarily a bad thing - once the chaff has gone then the only sites remaining will be the popular ones that people actually visit. It certainly makes finding things out easier when there are only a few central repositories where you need to look.
---
Jon E. Erikson
Alas poor LinSight... (Score:1)
What the heck were LinSight and LinDeveloper? The site doesn't seem to indicate anything except "we're done now".
--
Compaq dropping MAILWorks?
phew! (Score:2)
Re:Newsflash (Score:1)
Some companies are going down all the time too - check out this entertaining site: FuckedCompany [fuckedcompany.com].
Score points for predicting the death of dotcoms... Kinda like e-Trade with a cooler URL, eh?
;)
Very well... (Score:2)
Re:Inevitable, and not necessarily bad (Score:3)
For instance VA Linux via Andover already controls Freshmeat, slashdot, and a bunch of other frequently visited open source sites and is estimated to draw 50 percent of open source/linux traffic on the Net. I'm not sure if I should be celebrating the fact that one more voice from the other 50 percent is gone.
PS: This post is not trying to bash VA Linux but instead is mentioning the fact that already in the real world almost everything is in the hands of a few corporate entities (the same company that sells Marlboro cigarettes sells Post Cereal and Kraft foods, Disney owns ABC television and Miramax films, AOL owns CNN and Time)and the Net was supposed to be haven away from that where opposing views and opinions were only a mouse click away. I am not sure we should be celebrating the death of that...
More importantly (Score:1)
As someone interested in Linux development, let me just make this quick note: sites that are w4y kewl r4d h4x0r pages that are just links can die a horrible ignoble death as far as I'm concerned, but when a site goes down with original content, no matter if there were only two original articles there or whatever, that's a loss.
Maybe that insightful look into how ELF binaries are loaded or whatever will be lost.
Can I ask in future if a site's going to be pulled, to let us know in ADVANCE, so that we can copy the relevant (non-copyrighted) info?
Who's now got their content, that's what I want to know.
Maybe having one central repository'd be a better idea. A sort of LSDN.
Re:Too many Linux sites anyway (Score:1)
Now, that is a site we need. Keep all the script kiddies in one place.
This bothers me. (Score:3)
--Emmett
Syndication (Score:3)
Weblogs are a cool concept, but ultimately lead to fragmentation -- content, eyeballs, authors, and participants are spread among many distinct islands.
One of the more interesting ideas to emerge from the Advogato [advogato.org] / Kuro5hin [kuro5hin.org] axis is the concept of syndication. This would cover content, already common -- Slashdot and LinuxToday [linuxtoday.com] are essentially content syndication sites, and The Register [theregister.co.uk] officially sanctions linking [theregister.co.uk]. But syndication could also include a distributed user directory, and potentially (flame on) attributes such as karma or other metrics of merit from various sites.
I see a mix of several models coallescing into the final "product":
Still to be worked out are issues of story selection. Various models work -- Slashdot and IWETHEY fall at two extremes, with a dedicated editorial staff on the one hand, and a number of free-form "open forums" in which any topic may be posted and discussed. Kuro5hin's still working out the kinks, though a number of suggestions [kuro5hin.org] have been proposed.
The point is that high-quality (and low quality) content are created all over the Net. Mindless Link Propogation (TM) (MLP) is a useful way of aggregating it to key sites. Mindful link propogation might be even better.
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Scope out Kuro5hin [kuro5hin.org]
Never heard about it before (Score:1)
I heard internet.com is responsible for this (Score:1)
Re:Newsflash (Score:2)
Dave Whitinger (Score:1)
Why not just have one newspaper, TV station, or OS (Score:2)
Beyond that, let's consider editorial independance (although I'm sure
Having several outlets for news/opinion allows us to have a variety of view-points, and enough "bandwidth" to cover all the interesting stuff out there.
Otherwise, you might as well switch on the old "Big Brother" box, boot properly sanctioned windows on your computer, and have your thoughts dictated to you by others that know better than you.
Hard to Read (Score:1)
Linsider was even better than linuxtoday, but it was hard to read. With all the brown and grey colors it wasn't obvious what was a headline. I think that the original design of linuxtoday (Dave's first design) was even better than the new (current) scheme.
I read linsider daily, and found the signal-to-noise ration better than other news sites. It's a shame that it is going away.
-- Andy Wergedal
Re:This bothers me. (Score:1)
If there was arrogance, it must have been when he was younger... it's not him today.
Re:Too many Linux sites anyway (Score:3)
You're supposed to READ Slashdot?? I thought you were only supposed to glance at headlines and then wade in with an opinion. Except on this topic - posted 20 minutes ahead of the Napster story and only 16 comments vs. over 100.
We could beef that up by tweaking......
Napster not a factor in shutdown of LinSight
Posted by JonKatz [mailto]
carlos
Re:Inevitable, and not necessarily bad (Score:1)
Re:Atipa bothers me. (Score:1)