
Metalab Changes Its Name (Again) 97
Simon Spero writes: "Metalab, the site formerly known as SunSITE, is now www.ibiblio.org .
This change has been made in response to a donation by Bob Young and Mark Ewing of Redhat of $4 million; this grant will be used to apply the techniques and philosophies of the Open Source Movement to more traditional kinds of information, creating the first of a new kind of digital library. " Metalab URLs will continue to work.
Here's
the FAQ and
some more press coverage. Really the name change is secondary (I still hadn't stopped using sunsite bookmarks) but this could be really cool.
Re:Interesting (Score:2)
Sort of like Al Gore's famed "Open Source Web Page" idea? *ducks and runs for cover*
--
***Announcement*** (Score:1)
Re:"first of a new kind of digital library" (Score:2)
This "join venture" will house newer stuff, and not the old stuff that is housed on wiretap.
Unlike wiretaps, which is there mostly because copyright has expired, these works will be produced 'in the spirit of open-source' -- much like research papers are in the world of academia I guess.
value of redhat, bob, and marc (Score:1)
prosthetic-monkey.com [prosthetic-monkey.com]
nice to see they continue to give back to the community.
donfede
Re:Interesting (Score:1)
Votes do count, and this is a government based and dependant on participation. If corporations fill a large part of that participation, it is becuase of a lack of yours.
Re:The Last Best Place (Score:1)
Naive question: where in the TOS does SourceForge get the rights to your creation? I just skimmed throught the "Content" section, and the only relevant section was the 6th paragraph, which applies only to "text or data entered into and stored by publicly-accessible site features such as message boards and bug trackers" and "publicly-availabe statistical content. .
I take this to mean that you can't claim patches submitted via Sourceforge to be your own property; and since whatever work in question is presumably under an Open Source license, SourceForge's ability to "turn around and sell your work without giving you a cent" is the same as any other group's (Red Hat, for example).
It does seem that the TOS is intended for pieces of code rather than artistic content, so I'm not entirely clear how the TOS would work with a project such as propaganda. Even so, there doesn't seem to be anything that would give SF ownership of your work.
So, what am I missing in the TOS?
research papers (Score:1)
in the spirit of open-source' -- much like research papers are in the world of academia I guess.
If that were only true. Research papers published in respected journals are much less free than you might think. Pick up a random journal and find the "Information for Authors" section and read it. If you are an open source advocate, what you see will make your stomach flip.
It'll go from a "dot com" obsession... (Score:2)
And there are other days when I think it's only a matter of time before the domain squatting starts to wind down as more gTLDs are opened up
NOT. Witness Google.net [microsoft.net] and Google.org [google.org]. Microsoft.com [microsoft.com] is the same site as Microsoft..net [microsoft.net]. Squatters will squat on every available TLD. Even Slashdot.org [slashdot.org] has its own .com [slashdot.com].
<O
( \
XGNOME vs. KDE: the game! [8m.com]
This is why I can't wait for kuro5hin.org's return (Score:2)
Some of them are quite interesting. What's this about X.Org and Sun teaming up? And Linux binaries? And "Linux under attack"?
Man, I wanna see those stories... slashdot should make them available for reading regardless, just not turn on the feedback forum for each one
Re:The Last Best Place (Score:1)
Bowie J. Poag
Re:The Last Best Place (Score:2)
In each such case, the submitting user grants SourceForge the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive and fully sublicensable right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such Content (in whole or part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media, or technology now known or later develope all subject to the terms of any applicable Open Source Initiative-approved license.
Which means that you choose the license, and we will continue to use your code or whatever under the license you chose., The point of this is so that people can't pretend thier code isn't under a licences that they released it under previously. You're familiar with the OSI right? The GPL maybe? Well, if you aren't there are a lot of resources on the web for you, you probably shoudl start with them.
People, whenever you read a bowie post you should go back in the /. archives and read the previous responses as we've all heard his rants before and already addressed them.
Chris DiBona
VA Linux Systems
--
Grant Chair, Linux Int.
Pres, SVLUG
Re:I don't know what sourceforge would have wanted (Score:1)
Anyway, I was referring to VA ripping off our work during System 12's run, not Propaganda. Its too late to do anything about S12 except learn from it. Like hell I would let them do the same thing to me twice.
Ciao,
Bowie J. Poag
Gutenberg and perpetual copyright (Score:2)
<O
( \
XGNOME vs. KDE: the game! [8m.com]
Whose history? Poag's or Paog's? (Score:1)
<O
( \
XGNOME vs. KDE: the game! [8m.com]
quick props to paul jones, everybody (Score:2)
and, oh yeah, moderators, mod this one up.
Re:Name changes.... (Score:1)
It's simple... because all the good
Some "brilliant" person came up with the idea of sticking a letter in front of the name they initially wanted and thus where able to register it.
Re:Name changes.... (Score:1)
It's kind of like why all those morons want to get pierced bodies. They want to be different, just like everybody else.
I guess I'll never understand that mentality. It's like when the word 'alternative' suddenly meant 'popular' in music circles.
Back in my day when you wanted to do something 'different' you actually used your brain and came up with something (gasp) *original*. Why must we all assume that the last person to come up with a good idea must be the last person to ever come up with a good idea? Doesn't anybody realize we are all acting like cattle (and believe me I'm talking from experience here. When I worked on a farm if one cow took off in another direction, or even looked with her ears perked in another direction, every damn cow in the herd would go running in that direction trying to see what was so damn interesting over there.). Originality counts for nothing anymore. The morons that come afterwards get far more credit than the person that came up with the idea. Oh god the humanity of it all.
Please file this post under:
FIRST iPost from a disgruntled ePoster
Re:Interesting (Score:2)
Re:"first of a new kind of digital library" (Score:1)
Of course it a new kind. The old kind didn't get $4 million donations from open source companies.
----------
Re:Interesting (Score:1)
Don't we have the technology to go with a true democracy? Why not let everyone vote on all legislation and have your rep/sen vote the way of his constituent majority. Or just do away with Congress all together.
chaswell
--this is the most fun I have ever had on
The Last Best Place (Score:3)
After VA Linux Systems decided to rip us off and left us bleeding from the ass, (*cough*SOURCEFORGE*cough*) we opted to leave and do it on our own rather than stay and continue to take it. One of the first places to offer us a new home after we cut our ties with VA was MetaLab. They've been extremely helpful to us from the very beginning, going out of their way to make the transition as painless as possible. And, i'm quite happy to say that since April we've managed to regain our audience to the point where we are pulling in more people and more traffic now than at any point during our time with VA..
MetaLab is one of the last places i've ever seen that's willing to lend a hand and not really expect anything in return...So today, i've regained a little faith in Red Hat. Kudos to them for supporting an honest-to-God good thing. There needs to be an alternative to the VA resource monopoly, and SunSITE/MetaLab/iBiblio represents that ideal perfectly. Considering SourceForge's Terms Of Service [sourceforge.net] agreement, you'de be insane to host your project there. Youre essentially giving up your right to own that what you've created. When you move your project to SourceForge, VA now owns your project..It says so clearly in their TOS Agreement. They can turn around and sell your work without giving you a cent, or co-opt your work like they did with us, and leave you holding the bag. They're opportunists. The guys at MetaLab just want to provide a home for developers..they have no vested interests in what goes on there.
Thanks, Bob.
My $0.02,
Bowie J. Poag
Re:ibiblio (Score:2)
I'm a ib-ib-ib-ib-leo!
Vote [dragonswest.com] Naked 2000
This Just In.... (Score:3)
The company known as Ibiblio, formerly known as Metalab, formerly known as SunSITE, has now issued a press release stating that their new name will be F**kedCompany, as soon as they complete the purchase of the domain FuckedCompany.com [fuckedcompany.com]
Re:Interesting (Score:2)
Re:ibiblio (Score:1)
Ok, so you were trying for the (+1, Funny), I'll respond anyway. . .
It would make sense:
'eye-bib-lee-o' does make the most sense.
Re:Huh? (Score:1)
Personally, I'm amazed at how much Red Hat continues to give back to the community. Not only do they pay the upper kernel hackers (ala Alan Cox), but they hold true to the Open Source ideals. Some said that once they became public, they would become greedy and evil to meet shareholder's demands. Instead it has given them more money to expand Linux and give back to the community. Keep up the good work, Red Hat.
Re:Name change again (Score:1)
Dr. Fun (Score:1)
Why yes, there's a link to it on the front page. Doesn't really bug me, if they want to call it my.i.e.dotcom.b2b.org , cool with me.
On a side note, Is it just me or all the iBeHeader.com MyEviscerator.com eImpaler.com domain names already seem dated?
Re:Hmmm (Score:1)
Re:ibiblio (Score:1)
(sorry Bruce, it's been a long day)
--
ahh progress (Score:1)
then Walnut Creek changed from ftp.cdrom.com to ftp.freesoftware.com
time to go back to gatekeeper.dec.com or wuarchive.wustl.edu
Er, what the? (Score:2)
The agreement [sourceforge.net] basically says:
1) You agree that by agreeing, you are agreeing.
And by agreeing, you are bound by this contract.
2) We host the code, we don't give you dialup/WAN access.
3) Give us your real name. Mike Hunt is not a valid name.
4) You're responsible for your content. If you're going to host code, it has to be open source (as defined by OSI guidlines) as that's the focus of our site.
5) Don't resell this service.
6) We reserve the right to limit the service if need be (i.e.: bandwidth cap, file sizes cap).
7) Violation of our TOS, abuse of the site, a request for removal, and court order are valid reasons for removing a hosted site.
8) This is the web, we have links. If you link to DeCSS, we're not responsible
9) We're not liable for what we can't control.
10) Our trademarks are ours, and your are yours
11) Ditto for copyrights. Tell us if people violate this and #10.
12) This contract is the only thing you have to sign for us (sourceforge admins). Nothing more is required for hosting, etc.
13) Violations of this should be reported.
Hardly the totalitarian dictatorship conspiracy by ESR, RMS, VA, etc.. In fact, grepping for "sell," the only occurance of it is in point #5 about not reselling service!
If you're so afraid of people selling code you've worked on, don't make it opensource!
Otherwise, you're just being a troll.
--
What next? Commercial? (Score:2)
Ok, here we go - the site formerly known as Metalab's history:
Does anybody see where this next one might be headed? I can see it now:
--The formation of yet another company with its own interests .. When it happens .. remember you saw it here first!
You're on crack, Bowie... (Score:1)
So step away from the crack pipe and re-read that TOS.
P.S. It wasn't "royalties" but rather "royalty-free"
Re:First of a new kind? No, 29 years too late... (Score:2)
Thank You, Mr. Young ! (Score:1)
can we get this too ? (Score:1)
A nice big/huge searchable "ilibrary" category tree ? It's almost there, but not really as it
could be.
Re:Interesting (Score:1)
I think there already is one, isn't there? The Church of EMACS [stallman.org] Or is that open source as a religion?
Re:What next? Commercial? no way (Score:1)
Re:Any way to scrape up enough cash? (Score:1)
Hmmm (Score:1)
That's cool - whatever. Metalab/Sunsite/whatever has always been there, since the WAAAAY early days. A place that seems to be overlooked in this day and age of Freshmeat and Slapdot.
Long live... Err... Ibiblio!
ibiblio (Score:3)
wish
Vote for freedom! [harrybrowne2000.org]
---
Good use of stock options (Score:1)
my last Star Trek convention. How many here like old Trek versus new Trek?
Yeah, I thought so.
Remember to click on the banner ads, that's what keep the power flowing to the Geek
Compound.
Did I tell I tell you I visited the Geek Compound a while ago? A nice place, bigger than
you expect, with an amazing intense air about it. Kind of like the Vatican, but with fewer
releases of the libido.
Anyhow, I was in the bathroom their, a big place, when I heard two members of the Slashdot
staff in adjacent stalls.
CT: "Hey H, that bean dip did a number on me, and this stall is out of toilet paper,
do you have any on that side?"
H: "Sorry CT, this side is out too."
CT: "Bummer,
Thank you, thank you , you've been a wonderful audience.
uh...ok (Score:1)
Maybe I should change my name, I could use 15 minutes of fame.
Interesting (Score:3)
I wonder what would happen, though, if Zen programming were created. Or perhaps Expressionist network design. Or Republican computer repair....
WOO-HOO! (Score:2)
----
Tree Huggin' Hippies... (Score:2)
We're all about freedom, man! Free Tibet, free Burma, Free Love, you get the picture. We offer a free platform for the exchange of free thought. We host tons of cultural sites like the DocSouth Project, Zen@iBiblio, and North Carolina Raves (all of which can be seen from our collections index). We are also one of the first servers to mirror the original Linux kernel, so you can tell we're big on free software, too.
Hehehehe. :)
"first of a new kind of digital library" (Score:2)
first of a new kind of digital library
What about wiretap? [area.com]
What makes this a 'new kind'?
--
Re:Interesting (Score:2)
I say we try and have a v1.0 release before the 2004 elections.
Who is with me?
Chaswell
the donation did not come from RedHat (Score:5)
the donation did not come from RedHat, as many readers assume. the headline even says the money came from individual investors, which is closer to the mark. reading the full story will reveal that the $4 million donation came from the Red Hat Center [rhcenter.org] (center of what?) which is a "non-profit organization that supports, promotes, and engages in a wide range of initiatives to advance the principles of transparent technology [rhcenter.org]" (Bob Young's term for open source)
the guys from Red Hat started the Center with their own money (acquired from.. duh!) to use in promoting open source projects, even those in competition with RedHat.
RHC has also given big chunks of change [rhcenter.com] (tho none in the $4 million range) to the EFF (electronic fronteirs foundation), probono.net, and the Center for Media Education in Washington, DC
something folks haven't said much about is the plan to make ibiblio more slashdot-like in its sense of community, discussions, and ranking of the content. silly me, i would have thought cmdrtaco would have mentioned that
Name change effort (Score:1)
There are days when I cynically think that it can only get worse, as more people get on the Net and register their own domains. And there are other days when I think it's only a matter of time before the domain squatting starts to wind down as more gTLDs are opened up and people get away from the magic "dot com" obsession.
Re:Interesting (Score:2)
2. If we had more than %30 of the populace voting, they would care (That's just national, the numbers are less for local elections).
I don't care (Score:2)
If they change that then I'm screwed. It's burned in.
Name change again (Score:1)
Re:Interesting (Score:3)
Re:Interesting (Score:1)
1. I understand we don't have a true democ. I feel that with current technology we could support one.
2. Have any suggestions on who I should vote for?
Chaswell
-- thank you and good day.
a little about about the name change, too... (Score:2)
ibiblio (pronounced EYE bib lee oh, or by twiddling one's finger over one's lips) is "the public's library," a collaboration between UNC-CH (the home of metalab) and the RedHat center (the home of Bob Young's stock options) and has the goal of encompassing much more than just the metalab content, though that is the only thing under the ibiblio ubmbrella for now, and will likely continue to be the lion's share of what is there for a while to come.
so, it isn't that SunSITE/metalab == ibiblio, but rather that ibiblio == metalab + (add bunch of open source projects and archives here)
dig?
Any way to scrape up enough cash? (Score:1)
Re:How true . . . (Score:1)
You can't even get the link right . . .
contributor-run library, name change, etc (Score:3)
first the gift/collaboration is with the red hat center, a private foundation founded by marc ewing and bob young. not from red hat inc.
second, the new library idea is that we hope to use tools and experience familiar to those of us in open source development in other areas. we've done shared metadata, for example, for years in the LSMs and in the software archive on metalab/ibiblio/sunsite (you pick). This article in the Chronicle of High Education [chronicle.com] gets it pretty much right. i have an article forthcoming in CACM which tells more and can post to folks who are interested.
we last changed our name, from sunsite.unc.edu, because sunsite was owned by sun. when we went to enter into a collaboration with red hat center, they thought that a new name that showed something of a larger direction would be appropriate. i agree. i can't type it yet either, but then i typed meatbal for metalab for the past three years too
it's is our hope to create a library as noisy and democratic as slashdot [slashdot.org] itself. it will take us a while to combine, develop and implement the great ideas from the LSMs, slashdot, advogato, apache, sourceforge and the multitude of projects on sunsite/metalab/ibiblio. and we want your help.
peace love and sharing
Paul
actually we're trying to buy micr0soft (Score:1)
Re:can we get this too ? (Score:1)
Re:How far do they take their freedom? (Score:1)
Re:the donation did not come from RedHat (Score:3)
first the gift/collaboration is with the red hat center, a private foundation founded by marc ewing and bob young. [rhcenter.org] not from red hat inc.
second, the new library idea is that we hope to use tools and experience familiar to those of us in open source development in other areas. we've done shared metadata, for example, for years in the LSMs and in the software archive on metalab/ibiblio sunsite (you pick).
This article in the Chronicle of High Education [chronicle.com] gets it pretty much right. i have an article forthcoming in CACM which tells more and can post to folks who are interested.
we last changed our name, from sunsite.unc.edu, because sunsite was owned by sun. when we went to enter into a collaboration with red hat center [rhcenter.org], they thought that a new name that showed something of a larger direction would be appropriate. i agree. i can't type it yet either, but then i typed meatbal for metalab for the past three years too
it's is our hope to create a library as noisy and democratic as slashdot itself. it will take us a while to combine, develop and implement the great ideas from the LSMs, slashdot, advogato, apache, sourceforge and the multitude of projects on sunsite/metalab/ibiblio. and we want your help.
peace love and sharing
Re:Quit your bitching: System12 = "free toolkits" (Score:1)
"that's the main function of the project -- to allow Linux developers to increase the quality of their work, and make ourselves an integral part of what it means to develop applications for Linux as a whole."
Thank you.
Cheers,
Bowie J. Poag
Re:The Last Best Place (Score:1)
SourceForge reserves the right to(...) reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display..(...)
Thanks for clarifying everything i've been saying, Chris. Nothing prevents VA from co-opting your work and leaving you in the dust if they think they can turn a profit off you.
Glad to see you're still following me around, by the way--I was beginning to miss you. It warms my heart to see you're still doing what VA pays you to do. Clean up their public image.
I agree. Let them go back and read. Education is a wonderful thing -- I consider myself an authority on how your company is capable of screwing people over, and any knowledge of why they should avoid the company you work for is a good thing in my eyes.
Have a swell day,
Bowie J. Poag
Re:"first of a new kind of digital library" (Score:2)
Re:Whose history? Poag's or Paog's? (Score:1)
Thanks for pointing that out, by the way.
Bowie J. Poag
Re:First of a new kind of digital library? No. (Score:2)
this article in Chronicle of Higher Education [chronicle.com] mostly gets it right.
What the fsck is going on (Score:1)
2. Why is it alll the the the adolescent prats (probly runnng KDE and slagging of RMS cos they have no clue!) seem to to feel that as soon as a RH story appears Red Hat just has to be slagged off
Lets make this point again kiddies Red Hat have probably contributed ore to FREE (not OSS) software than anyone else (inc debian - just)
The point of the story is that basically a site for free software controlled by a propriety s/w copany has to all intents and purposes been taken over by a company that note not BSD, QPL,MPL or any other "I can shaft you later but aren't I virtuous" license eg: QPL ala KDE)
2. Note Has invested a not insignificant aount of money in making a proprietory site into a free sotware site
'nuff said
Re:Interesting (Score:1)
Re:can we get this too ? (Score:1)
The LCCL Subject Classification Schedule and millions of books, the Library of Congress did
classify, represent THE MODEL to classify internet content scientifically. One US book wholesalor includes in his books in print databases the LCCL number, but the format of these LCCL numbers make easily usable digitally. That's the problem. The Library of Congress also produces tapes and sells licenses for those data.
The online site of the Library of Congress doesn't offer a searchable subject category tree.
I don't know if this is because they haven't found a technical and solution to convert the LCCL number in a format usable for online searchspiders, or if they just didn't get enough money to launch such a project. It's a tragedy, IMHO.
A category tree of around 300 000 subject categories, developed by the best cataloger's in the world, SHOULD be taken seriously into consideration to be the basis of classifying
internet and book content. This is a big project and one which plays well together with a lot the Open Source community stands for, hopefully.
Can anyone spell hypocrite ? (Score:1)
Yet again, we see here on
Does not anyone else find it menacing that RedHat hold so much authority that in providing adonation, that they can force metalabs to redirect it's URL to something unpronouncable, and unmemorable ?
.
ho hum (Score:1)
I think they left out some "i"'s
Huh? (Score:2)
Name changes.... (Score:1)
Listening to Raekwon's "Sneakers"
Slackers at Slapmeat (Score:1)
That's pretty weak, dudes.
How far do they take their freedom? (Score:2)
If their all about freedom, has anyone uploaded a copy of deCSS yet? Would they fight to keep it?
On the other hand, I'd hate to see them burn through the entire $4M donation in lawyer bills....
foo to you and yours,
-l
Yes (Score:1)
Re:Interesting (Score:2)
Bookmarks? (Score:1)
Are those like Favorites?
Re:Interesting (Score:1)
Or, for those that want the illusion of independent thought, there are the non-sponsored (but quickly spanked) odball party candidates.
If the elections were open from the get go (in other words, real people got to be involved in the primaries, you know, like it used to be), then I wouldn't be speaking right now. But the fact is that without huge corporate sponsorship, there is no way a person can get enough coverage to be elected. An open source government would rule (if you could get enough people interested in it).
Unfortunately, right now, even if you pulled it off, you would only interest the few people that haven't already shrugged off the stupidity that government 'votes' have become. I don't think you would gain any huge amount of interest. People are too jaded, and most would suspect some sort of trickery.
I don't know what sourceforge would have wanted... (Score:1)
Damn those Va Linux guys for getting rich off of your ugly smudge work! Damn the man!
Sunsite changed its name? (Score:2)
Re:ibiblio (Score:2)
Re:Name changes.... (Score:1)
Why does every company getting involved in the web (and even some of them that always have been) insist on sticking either an 'i' or an 'e' at the begginning of their name?
A local editorial on a news program was done by a man that had a similar view to mine. He said, "If I see one more company try to get publicity by sticking an 'e' at the beginning of a common word I'm gonna shove a knife in my eye to prevent me from seeing another."
The very next day I saw that PC Week had changed their name to eWeek. I never found out if the guy followed through with his threat, but I never saw him on the tube again.
Open Source religion (Score:2)
__
Re:a little about about the name change, too... (Score:1)
Re:ibiblio (Score:2)
no, not really..
Vote for freedom! [harrybrowne2000.org]
---
Re:Whose history? Poag's or Paog's? (Score:1)
--
Re:Name goes to highest bidder ;-) (Score:1)
vi
i
"Enter your comments here!"
ESC
First of a new kind? No, 29 years too late... (Score:2)
I think Michael Hart, the founder of Project Gutenberg [promo.net] had this "new kind of library" very much in mind in 1971 when he started PG [promo.net]. I think that ibiblbibiblbiblio is a great site, it's just that it is not quite as groundbreaking as an idea as that.
-------------
Fist of a new kind of digital library? No. (Score:2)
First? No. This has been done: UofA Sunsite [ualberta.ca]
There are probably others too.
looks like more and more musicians are getting it (Score:3)
I had no idea this was going on. This is just too cool for words. It is so rejeuvinating to hear about an artist that cares about music as art and is doing something about it instead of using music as a ticket to noteriety and money.
Anybody else hear that the Smashing Pumpkins released their final album only as .mp3? Well, they did press 25 vinyl copies...
Maybe Sunsite, er, Metalab, er, iBiblio can do for music what mp3.com and napster have claimed they were going to do and failed.
Name goes to highest bidder ;-) (Score:1)
As long as the old bookmarks will keep working, no one will care
Not Red Hat god damnit... (Score:1)
BUT! back to the story..
If you just read the about this you will see that is Mark Ewing and Bob Young as persons that are giving away the money. I guess they are spending some of the money they earned when RH IPO:ed.
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
Re:Interesting (Score:1)