Sneak Peak: 3Com's New Audrey 73
neildogg writes "I had a second while 3Com's new Ergo site was up to save some of the images and screenshots from their new Web pad, the Audrey. I have put them up as a mirror at my site with features and specs as well, straight from the horse's mouth. Enjoy." Apparently the pics were up for just a couple of minutes, and then replaced with some boring "Coming Soon" graphics. So screw waiting, check it out.
Re:Pessimism about 3Com (Score:1)
Re:Smells like Neutrino (Score:2)
Oddity (Score:1)
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
- Bill
An ideer.. (Score:1)
Re:Modem? Ethernet? Bah! I want 802.11! (Score:1)
Re:They forgot an ethernet connection (Score:1)
I still haven't been able to figure out why only Compaq is offering the general public wireless LAN connectivity from a handheld (mmm...iPaq), or why noone has produced an 802.11b CompactFlash ethernet card. I thought the idea was that all these wonderful appliances and gadgets were supposed to connect to one another. Are we really expected to maintain a separate wireless modem connection for every device in the home of the future? (Granted, it would simplify customer profiling;-))
Re:print pics of Audrey (Score:1)
Re:They forgot an ethernet connection (Score:1)
Nice graphic design... I wonder if it's real? (Score:1)
They're using color coding to good effect, they're putting appropriate visual attention in the right places, they're using easy-to-read labels and typefaces...
It's impressive looking. I wonder if it's real, or if it's some illustrator RIP...
Re:Does anyone know what OS this runs? (Score:1)
digital dissonance: a guiltless state of awareness [digitaldissonance.com]
Re:Audrey II (Score:1)
"On the 23rd of September in a decade not too long before our own, the human race suddenly encountered a terrible threat to it's very existence."
Audrey was a mousey young woman who tried to tart herself up to be appealing to men and would inevitably fall victim to their use and abuse.
Audrey II was the name of the carnivorous plant from outer space with ambitions of world domination.
In some ways, I see both of the traits of these characters in Ergo's product. At least it doesn't run a Windows based OS (then it would DEFINITELY be in the carnivorous, world domination category :-)
From me, the poster (Score:1)
Re:From me, the poster (Score:1)
Re:From me, the poster (Score:1)
404 Not Found (Score:1)
Shaun
Re:Why oh why (Score:3)
I added a set of wireless ethernet cards (webgear aviator 2.4Ghz) for another $150, and dropped the second card in my basement Red Hat 6.2 server (a 233 AMD system with 64MB ram and 20 gigs or so of hard drive).
Because both run X, I can export whatever graphical apps (including the whole display) across the wireless link whenever I want. It is (as you describe) very usefull.
Here's the rub. Even though my laptop is reasonably modest in capabilities (you could not buy a machine today with this small a CPU), it still runs for $800 used, and still only displays 800x600 pixels. OK for a laptop, but embarrassing for a desktop. For an XGA laptop, we are talking some serious money. Even assuming you could drop some non-essentials (floppy drive, hard drive, etc), you are still looking at $300 or more just for LCD screen, not to mention keyboard, glidepad, cpu, memory, etc.
That's why all these cheap internet appliances have a custom dedicated UI, to keep them cheap. Any kind of usable generalized access device for a desktop system is either going to be more expensive then your desktop (because of the more expensive portable components), or so inferior in capability as to be useless.
The displays are really the rub right now... it is pretty darn cheap to produce a big glass tube, and pretty darn expensive to produce a small LCD. Maybe once the lighte emitting polymers hit the real world this will change, but don't expect it inside of the next two years.
IMHO
It looks like a... (Score:1)
--MD
Re:Why oh why (Score:2)
I realize that this does little for the Nix crowd but it would be interesting to see the thing. Particulalry since many of the clients I have to work with use NT for everything. If you've never used Citrix, you can get a desktop on an NT terminal server from anywhere on the network. I've used it quite a bit at work and it seems to suck less than I expected it to.
Re:Pessimism about 3Com (Score:1)
I apologize. Earlier I did not justify why I was so upset at this potential direction. The reason is very simple. 3Com is a big name, and they are about to release a larger integrated device. I think it's *very* important for Linux to secure places in the integrated market because that is where Microsoft are going next! M$ are gearing up for cell phones, PDA's, and this may only be the next instance of one - except it's being made by a company that is or at least used to be pro-Linux. Do you see my point?
Re:What is that? (Score:1)
Huh? (Score:1)
Is this just another marketing-esque way to describe something that has been around since the dawn of GUIs? (Like a menu bar)
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Even sending changes in terms of rectangles (or whatever) of pixels is quite expensive, mainly because you have to look at what the changes are in the first place (the graphic engine of the underlying platform may be of great help here).
Although VNC is a Good Thing(TM) when the server runs on a *NIX machine, there are more mature (in terms of performance) products to remotely display Windows applications (i.e. PCAnywhere). VNC people acknowledge this, saying that there is large space for improvements.
But if you need only to run remote X applications and have an X server, a really good solution is compressed X protocol: see the LBX-HOWTO [paulandlesley.org] and DXPC [vigor.nu] in particular (the link in the HOWTO is outdated). With dxpc, 128kbps should be really more than enough for everyday's needs (unless you have to play Quake, of course, or watch a DVD...).
Now, what I'd really like to see is something supporting both this and ICA (and perhaps some local apps in ROM/Flash, since the thing necessarily needs some processing power and RAM in any case).
I also know an answer is "shut up, buy yourself a laptop with 802.11, install Linux on it and on your box in the basement", but a device having a only a compact flash slot (instead of hard disk/floppy/cdrom/etc.) and keyboardless (if you have to type extensively, better go to a desktop anyway) would be IMHO a better (and possibly cheaper?) solution.
No answering machine? (Score:2)
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Smells Like A Fake (Score:1)
Re:What is that? (Score:1)
Ugh. I don't want to pay for this thing, which exists ONLY to push branded content at me, apparently. Lool at the brands visible in these images:
http://www.onebahamas.com/audrey/ch_fullsize_01
http://www.onebahamas.com/audrey/ch_fullsize_03
http://www.onebahamas.com/audrey/ch_fullsize_02
If it's fully configurable, that's one thing... have to wait and see. Hopefully these are just pre-placed bookmarks, and not the complete infoscape for this device. But nothing would surprise me anymore, since they transfered me to Sales at work.
Audrey II (Score:1)
Re:Paranoia (Score:1)
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
You see, Windows NT Terminal Server *IS* a multi-user, multi-processing, remote display-enabled system.
But it's a heckuva lot more expensive than Linux!!!
-Joe
Re:What is that? (Score:1)
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Heh. Go look at this link, then.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Sneak Mountain? (Score:1)
Pessimism about 3Com (Score:2)
What is that? (Score:2)
Hmmm...then again, perhaps I could create the world's first net ready trashcan. Yet another reason to postpone taking out the garbage.
They forgot an ethernet connection (Score:1)
Theres more pictures here (Score:1)
Why oh why (Score:3)
The only answer I can think of is: distance. If it's just a remote display, you can't tote it around outside the house. I have two responses:
1) So what? It would still be a useful product--wireless will get you pretty far (the yard and maybe even next door).
2) Ubiquitous wireless: People say how great it would be if they could be "always on" but never mention the problems of synching up your palm with your car with your phone with your desktop. So why not integrate all these things: Your house has a "computer center" (a regular desktop would do) and all your remote devices are just displays from that center. Now synchronization in time (when I switch devies) AND in space (when I'm using device A and wifey is using device B) is automatic.
Of course, given that only Linux (with it's multi-user, multi-processing, remote display-enabled X server) is well-placed to provide this need is just a plus...
--
An ambivalent move by 3Com (Score:1)
Sincerely,
Bob Jones III [goatse.cx]
Re:No answering machine? (Score:1)
Nice Catch (Score:2)
Does anyone know what OS this runs? (Score:1)
Amazing! (Score:1)
I really love the 'Meadows' color, too...Who'd have thought that avocado green would come back on a computer...
--K
---
Re:Pessimism about 3Com (Score:2)
The site, currently sitting on 3Com's public server, announces Audrey, 3Com's Palm-connectable appliance, aimed at women. According to the site, Audrey will ship in a range of pastel colours - shades of Apple's iMac here - and sport a 6.25in x 4.75in (the resolution is 640 x 480, judging by the site's HTML) touch-sensitive screen; built-in 56kbps modem, speakers and microphone; serial and USB ports; and a wireless keyboard. Audrey is based on National Semiconductor's Geode CPU.
Audrey will ship with its own Web browser and personal information management features. 3Com is basing some Ergo products on the Palm OS, others on QNX's Neutrino realtime OS - we suspect the latter is being used for Audrey, though the site gives no clues.
Re:Paranoia (Score:2)
> Do they look obviously retouched?
Well, while I can't give the definitive answer on that, the interface on this image [http://www.onebahamas.com/audrey/ch_fullsize_03.g if] [onebahamas.com] is absolutely identical to that of Mac OS. From the pull-down menu to the "Find" button to the text on the page, this looks exactly like a screen shot from a Mac web browser.
This says something about either the underlying OS of Audrey or the veracity of this information. I'm just not quite sure which.
Smells like Neutrino (Score:2)
(http://www.qnx.xom)(http://get.qnx.com)
QNX is a unix clone and the company just released it into the 'free' domain, meaning the base OS is free, as well as some applications. If I recall, the netappliance i-opener that was released earlier this year also runs the qnx platform, and people managed to hack into it and use their own isp's, also people were able to install linux (the linux install required a hardware hack though).
That would mean that this handheld would run a client similar to xwindows. This is a dream come true. Perhaps it is an easily hackable unit also?
Oh, if anyone wants to see QNX, look here QNX website [qnx.com]
QNX is a realtime OS also by the way, and I believe is posix compliant....
Use your current ISP...not mine! (Score:2)
Ah well, enough whining...ErgoAudrey, meet Mr.Soldering Iron. I believe the two of you have a date for the voiding of your waranty this evening. (evil grin).
Re:Who needs Voice Email? (Score:1)
--
Re:Who needs Voice Email? (Score:1)
The problem is solved on the Palm PDAs with Graffiti, FITALY and similar, but not on cell phones. Voice is the most compact and intuitive interface for entering information, so it's one obvious solution for small consumber devices. Time will tell if it's a good solution.
yuck (Score:1)
it's not small enough to put in my pocket like a palm and yet it's not really a computer like i'm used to. What's so hard about making a laptop-sized machine with a flip-out keyboard (or attachable via cable) and a pen-sensitive screen (flipped over from the normal laptop orientiation, so that the device can be rested on a forearm and held by one hand and "written" on with the other) that runs on either x86 or ppc chips and natively supports either win9x/2k/nt/linux/mac os-- depending on architecture. Why does this have to look so dang ugly, and how many more of these vaporware announcements can I stand?
Ugly (Score:1)
The tops are way to thick, and the colors are horrible too.
Just My Opinion
But... (Score:1)
---
Re:Audrey Meadows (Score:1)
3Com? (Score:1)
More info at palmstation (Score:3)
There has been discussion there about these links all week.
Paranoia (Score:2)
Now I'm paranoid. How many people actualy saw this momentary images? Do they look obviously retouched? Whats the source? But wait, i thought the mac cube was fictional and was wrong, so then i start questioning my questioning...
The only way from here is down...
Audrey II (Score:2)
I think that if 3Com entered the flesh-eating plant business, their image would suffer immensly.
Re:Oddity (Score:1)
Why would you want it to dial itself? Try it on your own phone, it won't work. All you'll get is a busy signal. You might think to yourself "gee, why do I get a busy signal - I'm not talking to anyone on the phone", but think about it for a minute and you'll understand why it doesn't work.
Oh, you meant that it should have a built-in cellphone modem or some fancy crap. Well, for that you have the USB sockets I guess...
Doesn't really matter, these things are still too ugly and expensive to be of any use for any person with half a brain. Come to think of it, that goes for any PDA.
As for your .signature, may I please have a Spectrum Java runtime platform instead?
--
Who needs Voice Email? (Score:2)
First, a voice email is always much larger than an ordinary one with the same content. That doesn't just affect the transmission time (that Audrey thing only has a 56k modem, so that does make a difference), but also the amount of space it needs when stored. My email archive is already in the thens of megabytes, and I store attachments separately.
And why do I need voice, anyway? What do we have writing for? And if I want you to listen to me talk, why don't I just leave a message on your answering machine?
I don't get it. Is this just so that people will not have such problem with the stylus input, or are they serious about this?
Sony releases their Webpad too (Score:1)
Sony launches wireless home Net access device By: Tony Smith Posted: 28/09/2000 at 16:18 GMT Sony has unveiled a product to bring the Net to the Net-less - a home-oriented mobile device that gives users access to the Net without the need for a PC. Based on home wireless networking, Sony's Airboard is an LCD screen tablet and base-station combo. The base-station hooks straight into the Net and beams requested Web pages and downloaded media files across the ether to the Airboard. "Without using a PC, users can access information from anywhere, effectively solving the so-called 'digital divide' problem," Sony Electronics' Shizuo Takashino told a press conference held this morning in Japan, referring to the gap between the Net-connected PC-owning elite and... er... everyone else. for rest of article click here [theregister.co.uk]
Interesting that both devices are being released at the same time.... anyone know what the price tag on the audrey is going to be? Or have pics of the sony device? If anyone remembers the last big 'sony pda' (the MagicLink) it was launched to rival the Apple Newton, and was a nice unit, but i don't think they sold to well. It used the magic cap OS, had a built in phone that could be used with a headset, a modem, AOL, and alot of other programs. Anyone know how the 3com and the new Sony device compare to each other?.
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Wouldn't it require a lot of wireless bandwidth to send 800x600x24bits 70 times a second?
-Erik
Re:An ambivalent move by 3Com (Score:1)
Tired of vaporware? -This webpad is available now! (Score:2)
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Steve "Disgruntled Psion user: Love the machines, too bad they don't know how to publicize or distribute them." Rapaport
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Modem? Ethernet? Bah! I want 802.11! (Score:2)
You have this ultra-portable pad thing, and you want to wire it to the net? That's insane. These things cry for wireless. And it's not even an option.
Count me out of this one. (And that's too bad, 'cause the first company that gets it right will have me stampeding for the checkout counter.)
jim frost
I suspect BeOS (Score:1)
NatSemi had been working on their Linux version for 7 months but it didn't make it in time. They may have gotten their Linux version completed, but I suspect the speed to port BeOS and produce a plausible IA interface might have killed Linux's chances.
Re:Why oh why (Score:1)
Come on, which sounds better in the brochure?
a. "Audrey can be a family's nerve center in no time. She handles schedules, phone books, and notes. Every Palm handheld in your home can Hotsync to Audrey so everybody knows where everybody's going."
b. "Run your old software on a remote display."
Ok, you as a Slashdot reader might choose (b), but I can guarantee you that (as usual - see the XFce article for more details from just about anyone) most people want something that you just turn on and use, and doesn't involve old software or anything fiddly like that. The old software may very well actually BE easier, but it doesn't really sound that way. Stating the Audrey's capabilities and leaving the details out of the way paints a far more appealing picture.
Bruce
USB ethernet connection? (Score:2)
Re:What is that? (Score:1)
Hey, Apple's sold plenty of notebooks that look like toilet seats.
Bruce
Re:Pessimism about 3Com (Score:1)
Re:More info at palmstation (Score:2)