
Sentient Computing Lab 116
dedair writes "From the people who brought you VNC, AT&T labs has been working on an ultrasonic location system that they use in their labs in Cambridge, Engalnd. It turns a whole building into a virtual computing center. No matter where you are in the building, your phone calls can be forwarded to you and with the use of VNC, your desktop is always in front of you. Pretty cool stuff with more
details at their website."
Re:How does everyone else view VNC (Score:1)
Re:Olivetti on Discovery years ago (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't like it (Score:1)
It even knows what shirt color you're wearing!! (Score:1)
http://www.uk.research.att.com/spirit/images/me
Re:Uhmm... sentient? (Score:1)
Slashdot Spellchecker To Coming Online....? (Score:1)
C'mon, Hemos. If you had read your post even once before you submitted it you would've caught, "Engalnd".
the future is here (Score:1)
Of course, now my computer will start talking like Rudy and I'll never get any work done at all.
-Chris
...More Powerful than Otto Preminger...
Re:Bluetooth (Score:1)
The current versions for phones are not even capable to work without Line of Sight. If they require LOS then why not use IR instead? The more powerful versions will be able to penetrate clothing and such, but since they will draw more juice then will probably not be the ones used in the first products.
Furthermore it seems like Bluetooth has been stricken by a severe case of "design by committee". That is, it lost track of the technical applications and instead it's become a part for marketing.
And I can not understand why so many want Bluetooth as a NIC in a computer. If you want wireless LAN there are already a bunch of products based on IEEE802.11x on the market NOW! Why wait for Bluetooth? Sure, it's supposed to have really low power consumtion, but does it matter in a laptop with an LCD, harddrive and CD-Rom?
Finally, Bluetooth is a NETWORK layer. It's not a "end of all protocols magic wand" that some people seem to think. It will NOT make your homestereo talk with Mr Coffee. It will NOT allow you to program your VCR through the computer (or palmtop). It's just a stupid (in a protocolly-challenged way) network for crying out loud!
What you WANT is something like Jini from SUN. But a version that is actually available on the market. And need I say this an OPEN standard. Sony has already developed near magical things for their home entertainment systems, like S-Link and newer versions of it. But unless you are a member of the "Happy Sony Family" and only have their products on the shelf then it won't do diddly/squat. Why not let the customers use the API to create their own shortcuts in the home?
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:1)
Q I thought this was something to do with ORL? What's the Olivetti/Oracle link here?
A In January 1999, AT&T acquired ORL, the Olivetti Research Laboratory founded 12 years earlier, and recently jointly funded by Oracle, to create AT&T Laboratories Cambridge.
Here is the link for VNC
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
And the faq
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/faq.html
KH-ing ?
Re:Typical, England brought you 1984, (Score:1)
Re:General pager/cell-phone rant response (Score:1)
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:1)
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:1)
Re:How does everyone else view VNC (Score:1)
(I'm only talking of doing admin on WinBoxes here), it's IMHO faster and more versatile than VNC, and offers a HUGE amount of other features such as a SSH telnet server, remote file manipulation, process level info, performance graph, etc...
So okay it's not free (as in Beer) like VNC, but is an outstanding product, they have a trial version, give it a spin.
Murphy(c)
Bit more detail (Score:1)
Don't know why this has suddenly appeared on
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
Re:Ensure Technologies (Score:1)
How do you solve that one? One idea was to have the ID in a ring so that it only picks you up when your hands go within ~20cm of the keyboard... with a suitable hystresis and a fast enough log in, this could work...
AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:1)
Just want to give credit where credit is due.
/
Privacy vs. Utility (Score:1)
The bat opens doors so you don't have to take your keys out; notifies you of email and phone calls, which you can then access at the nearest computer or phone; allows you to drop any of your VNC desktops onto the nearest workstation; allows you to determine when someone is in a meeting or on the phone and therefore saving you a fruitless walk over to their office; and so on.
And yes, it is fantastic watching everyone moving around on the magic map.
Rupert.
sounds nice but... (Score:1)
All I need now (Score:1)
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
although I understand that soem people do ever want anyone to know anything about them so maybe the original reply of mine was a little harsh
Jon
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
Technology for people who don't want to do anythin (Score:1)
The problem is you have to exit the entire building to leave "The System". Sorry, this virtual womb thing sounds fascinating and all, but like sometimes one needs to um exit, leave, depart, you know... breathe.
Course, we know why this is going to become more common. Consumers don't really want to go anywhere today. They just want less intrusion into their lives, least of all the sort of intrusion that requires them to put in some effort, which means more modern inconveniences will intrude. Imagine the shock of realizing they have no life once these inconveniences stop distracting them from the life they don't actually have.
As I always say, Big Brother is just a shadow cast by millions of little brethren.
Re:Typical, England brought you 1984, (Score:1)
Aldous Huxley wrote um Brave New World.
1984 is the work of Eric Blair aka George Orwell.
Re:On second thought Big Brother is a good thing (Score:1)
I'm not saying a contractor should get residual income from the hotel he's building, that's a separate enterprise which he has no legal claim to and should have no legal claim to.
But he should get paid more than the amount he gets to build a deck.
Re:Cool, so can I? (Score:1)
Nah. They don't have sensors in the bathrooms. Or PCs, for that matter.
Some of the guys in this lab supervise students here; a friend of mine turned up to a supervision and met his supervisor at the door - the supervisor had opened up a security camera display on his desktop and kept an eye out for him.
Another cool toy they've got is remote dial-in access to the security cameras from their cellphones: being geeks, they use it to check for parking spaces in the company car park before coming in :-)
Sounds like a serious geek paradise, this place!
Re:Hemos sniffed Three Lines from the mirror (Score:1)
Rich
Why? (Score:1)
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
It does kind of look like someone was watching STNG for a little too long, which bugs me because on the USS 1701D You can just say "computer, locate my slacker employee" and it tells you what they're up to.
Yeah, but they fixed it in DS9 and VOY. ;) Now all you have to do is take off your com-badge and leave it in the restroom.
"Computer, locate ensign Kim."
"Ensign Kim is taking a dump and cannot be disturbed at this time."
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
and i`m getting subtle movements...its like hes moving, yet his location isnt changing...
funny (Score:1)
As a proof of concept, it's great. But personal freedom is a slippery slope. Once we start down the path, it's too easy to keep adding more monitoring.
On the other hand, NSA is just loving the possiblities with this!
How does everyone else view VNC (Score:1)
Re:Typical, England brought you 1984, (Score:1)
Huxley wrote 'Brave New World'
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
Re:Cool, so can I? (Score:1)
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:1)
-Ciaran
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
IIRC, there was some sort of light sensor on the badges that ensured they weren't active when, eg. in a desk drawer. It was possible to turn off the device simply by placing it in the dark.
-Ciaran
This is ANTI-Big brother.... (Score:1)
Re:Of course the real question here is... (Score:1)
Sean
Y'know what would be totally awesome? (Score:1)
"Ishpeck to bridge, we've got a subspace quazi-spectral anomoly here---I'd like to run a level one diagnostic on the ship's sensor array."
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
Bluetooth (Score:1)
Bluetooth will let PCs, PDAs, phones, printers, headsets, sensors all interact with each other in a PicoNet, which is a small personal area network. There are currently two cards available which support the Bluetooth 1.0/1.1 stack on Windows and Linux. They are made by Motorola and IBM.
Here [ibm.com] is a manual for IBM's bluetooth card if you want to take a look at the software and what Bluetooth is capable of.
Ericsson also makes a wireless Bluetooth headset that will attach itself as an audio device to your PC, cordless phone or mobile phone. You can leave your phone in your briefcase or in your living room and take a call in your office over your Piconet.
Pretty cool stuff, hopefully we'll see more in the way of innovation of Bluetooth in the next year.
-Pat
Ensure Technologies (Score:1)
It supports computer access control and tracking. XyLoc's full-time access control technology addresses the major vulnerability inherent in all existing security methods - they are gatekeepers that protect the information only at the point of entry: the initial logon process. Other security solutions are not "smart" enough to recognize that users are not in control of their computers at all times after logon After users have entered their password, inserted their token or placed their finger on the reader and they have been identified and authenticated, the gate is wide open and information assets are up for grabs the minute the user walks away from the PC.
XyLoc's operation is easy, transparent and automatic. XyLoc consists of a lock that is an ultra low-power wireless transceiver that attaches to the PC's serial, keyboard or USB (Universal Serial Bus) port. The XyLoc key is a battery-operated ultra low-power transceiver with a unique, encrypted user identification code that is worn or carried by an authorized user. The XyLoc lock and key are in constant, encrypted two-way wireless communication with each other, with the lock scanning for the presence or absence of authorized users. As the user approaches the PC, XyLoc identifies and authenticates the user, and unlocks the PC as appropriate. Then, if the user moves out of the active zone, XyLoc will automatically blank the screen, lock the keyboard and disable the mouse. The PC is instantly secured and remains so until an authorized user moves back inside the active zone. However, background tasks, such as printing and downloading, may continue while the PC is locked.
-Pat
Re:Didn't Xerox PARC do this first? (Score:1)
Re:Didn't Xerox PARC do this first? (Score:1)
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:1)
As I recall, the badges were built from bits of TV remote. My favourite touch was the way they dealt with the collision of signals when multiple people were in the room -- instead of a random-wait-before-retry approach (ala Ethernet), each badge sent its hellos in the same interval, but using cheap (as in beer) parts that had significant variations in internal clock. Given a few minutes, the drift would eventually open a window.
I think the other part of it was that the interval was also proportional to the amount of light falling on a sensor, so yes, putting it in a drawer effectively turned it off (of course, it couldn't get an IR signal out through an opaque drawer anyway...)
The hard part is cultural, of course, so that people see it as a useful tool rather than a spy for an oppressive management. The environment they described sounded pretty techno-idylic -- I'd have strong doubts about this kind of system in a factory or even most offices.
Nerf wars will never be the same (Score:1)
Sounds like a legitimate business expense to me..
I can hear it now... (Score:1)
"ROGERS! Get the hell off the can! You've been in there for an *hour and a half*!"
--nick
Re:This is ANTI-Big brother.... (Score:1)
I figure as long as you aren't required to use it. There would be times in the day when I don't want anyone to follow me around as I'm pacing the halls tearing hair out because of a project that just isn't working. In which case, I leave the bat in my office and put a message or something on it "Storming around in anger, Please Do Not Disturb". Problem solved.
Does This Mean (Score:1)
"Me Ted"
So now we have bigger and better surveilance (Score:1)
Ideas are always great in themselves, it's only how we use them.
Cool, but... (Score:2)
Re:Cool, but... (Score:2)
Oh crap....that stupid bat must have fallen out of my pocket onto the floor of my office. Again.
Even better, hook it up to an RC car and race it through the halls. Your boss will think you really wanna get things done.
Stupid Monitoring Tricks (Score:2)
To a large extent cellphones with text-messaging & email gateways have replaced much of the functioniality (it's easier to reach us at our designated phone then have a nearby one ring for us plus we can accept/decline the call based on who it is and recieve simple text-messages.)
Corporate directory services & biometric logins have replaced another large part of the functioniality. It's not much more of a bother to stick one's thumb in the reader then to walk into the office & since the system was sometimes overzealous (I just walked in to talk, not to log out some poor coder halfway through a thought simply 'cause I was Sr.) this feature was soon turned off.
What's left is more of the Big-Brother people-tracking features that weren't so appreciated.
Frankly while I think it's a neat technology much of it will probably appear in a less-automated way. We'll be able to adjust common things using our phones / palmstops / whatever using a virtual dimmer / volume control / etc. and come up with a room consensus, or at least local variations. Secured doors will unlock automagically as we push against them instead of requiring an explicit keycard swipe.
But tracking, thanks, been there / done that / not interested.
Re:Olivetti on Discovery years ago (Score:2)
Phone transfers nothing new... (Score:2)
Olivetti on Discovery years ago (Score:2)
It's a pretty swell idea, you never miss phone calls. But then you can never AVOID phone calls either, which I guess would suck.
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:2)
what bennefit does it have over ssh + X11 forwarding? (besides running on windows)
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:2)
Re:Sun Microsystems has a similar system (Score:2)
Just yesterday our whole group went down to a test lab as a group to try a mass testing of our app where we were all together in one room at the same time. I used VNC to let us have access to the server to view logs and fix small problems while the test was in progress, really handy.
Also, at a local Sun campus things seem to work more that way. My friends there have permanent offices (well, as permanent as any office ever is!). They also have some of the exact same hosting cubes that the original poster described for employees visiting from other buildings or states to access thier desktop.
Re:Sun Microsystems has a similar system (Score:2)
I don't get the motivation behind hot-desking - it seems a really good way of demoralisng your entire workforce for very little gain. We're naturally territorial - as are most living things. The first thing anybody ever does is to define a bit of sapce in the world as their own by putting up pictures, unpacking their favourite coffee cup/stuffed lizard/electric pencil sharpner. Living in hotel rooms is miserable (even if your significant other is there too) simply because it's impersonal and dehuminising. Hot-desking is, for this reason alone, a really bad idea.
Interesting you're at Sun - another thing that didn't quite work out was the diskless computer. I wonder if part of this is for the same reason - I know you get your filestore, desktop and so on, but its still not your computer with its own local drive, humming power-supply fan, and (goddam it), smell.
Do you try to book the same cuboid every day?
Seems to know which way people are facing... (Score:2)
I wonder how much of this is inspired by cheap science fiction programs - all the user interfaces in Space 1999 were made out of paper too...
Can you turn it off? (Score:2)
#include "disclaim.h"
"All the best people in life seem to like LINUX." - Steve Wozniak
Yeah... (Score:2)
This was MANY years ago - at least 10 years ago. I remember seeing it while I was in high school. Only now are the pieces really falling into place.
I just wonder why it takes so damn long for these type things to catch on (like multimedia - started in the mid-80's with the Amiga, didn't become popular until the mid-90's with the PC).
Worldcom [worldcom.com] - Generation Duh!
Bell Labs has been doing this for some time... (Score:2)
...if I recall correctly. It might be somebody else, but I distinctly remember reading an article about this many years ago.
The one I remember works like this (I can't get to the linked article, bad network today). An embedded chip in the company ID badge serves as the locator, but only functions while on campus. When sombody dials "your" number, the system finds you, finds the telephone nearest to you, and rings that 'phone.
Like I say, this isn't new, but I cannot recall whether that place was Bell Labs or somewhere else. Almost certain it was Bell Labs. And, of course, that was only the telephone system -- nothing about VNC, etc, etc.
ugh! (Score:2)
The truth is, people don't like to be tracked, at home, or at work (privacy, anyone?) We reluctantly accept the fact that we have to wear badges to work, and scan into locked doors, et cetera, but I do not want my employer to have the ability to determine my physical location every second of the workday. $megacorp does have the right to make sure that I am being productive, but that can much more easily be done by using performance metrics (you pushed 4000 papers today!) and, ideally, with the employee's direct relationship to his/her supervisor.
Furthermore, tracking users is not "sentience." this is simply determining the presence or absence of a value given a location. Granted, they took a n additional step in making someones' computer profile follow them wherever they go, but even NT can do that! (to a much lesser extent, but still roaming profiles)
Re:Can you turn it off? (Score:2)
That being said, there's another issue of PHB policies of "from 9 to 5 don't even think about turning it off" etc. I'd say I'm more concerned about that then the actual device. Sort of like Mr. Spacely following George around the office. That would be the only reason I wouldn't one. Fortunately I don't work for Mr. Spacely.
"You'll die up there son, just like I did!" - Abe Simpson
On second thought Big Brother is a good thing (Score:2)
Well to be an employer man you gotta have money.
Cuz once you got money, all the wannabes will back you up no matter what shit you pull. If you can get away with it they figure someday they will too or they'll just invest in your little racket and profit regardless whether you ever get caught or not. If people can't control their spending, fuck it gimme every dime. Why? So I can buy a couple of public libraries, build a house on a mountain, grow a forest around it and make scary noises in the middle of the night to keep the fearful away.
Then I can go back to being a normal techie interested in learning and can keep the little brethren at arms length.
C'est la vive.
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:2)
It has a few disadvantages too. It's flaky on windows (Can't hook into the graphics context so has to take screen snapshots) and a bandwidth hog but remember, the task is not to find the "best" way to implement a user interface to a computer but the one most suitable for the job (I've found it a godsend when debugging keyboardless kiosk applications)
Rich
Sentient, yeah, right (Score:2)
Much more powerful people tracking systems exist. The prison industry is big on this stuff. This system [abscomtrak.com] has a particularly cool animated graphic.
The real utility here is to have a system where anybody can use any computer in an office and see their environment, just like the old dumb terminal days. Somebody should put that into a Linux distro. It would give Linux something that Windows doesn't have, and given Microsoft's pricing model for software, won't have.
Re:I don't like it (Score:2)
Re:Sentient, yeah, right (Score:2)
Get over your obligation to answer the phone... (Score:2)
When I get back to someone, I just say "Hi, I'm returning your call." I don't feel the need to explain why they got my voicemail, because I am not obligated to pick up the phone whenever it rings.
I guess I am pretty lucky in the workpace. I have told our CEO when he knocked on my door that I was in the middle of a design discussion, and could I catch him in his office in a little while? I can do that because he understands I have tasks to do, and wants me to do them effectively. Others' mileage may vary.
Re:Of course the real question here is... (Score:2)
Sean
Re:Of course the real question here is... (Score:2)
Sean
BFG in the ol' briefcase (Score:2)
Sean
A few thoughts.. (Score:2)
Dark Futures? (Score:2)
1) Lan intergration into houses was a routine low maintenance item
2) The Software for the servers were well maintained, and did not require the home owner to intervene
3) The home owner would be educated to not mess with the system (think of your usual riff-raff of corporate users. Now remember that a lot of these folks own homes.
4) The default failure mode for these system is not life threatening, but allows basic manual operation of things like heat, etc.
5) the home owner is sold on the idea that he never messes with the system.
6) The homes in a neighborhood and across the town and state, etc are integrated into a flawless system not subject to weather conditions, earthquakes, and other natural disaters.
7) Political parties would have to cooperate like factions of a mafia family, without greed, to make sure that the system is maintained in perfect harmony.
8) Commercial interests who want their fingers in the pie are kept in line
9) ETC.
Sounds easy to me
General pager/cell-phone rant (Score:2)
Seems like whenever there's an article that has something to with pagers or cell-phones, someone says something to the effect of "I don't carry any of these things because it's an intrusion of my privacy, and besides, I like interacting with people the old-fashioned way." Often, it's said in a holier-than-thou way that I find really annoying.
Now, I'm not accusing you (JJ) of saying this; the way I read your post, you were just stating your own opinion, which is quite fair enough. And you did add a bit about how you interact with your co-workers, which is positive for this discussion.
But all too often, people say things which basically boil down to "I don't like pagers and cell-phones!", which is not particularly insightful or illuminating. Giving a personal opinion is all well and good, but this opinion has already been said by zillions of people zillions of times, on Slashdot and in countless other forums. Why not try and add something more original to the discussion?
(After all, if you don't want to be disturbed, you can turn it off.)
Sorry for the slight rant.
(For the record, I don't carry a pager or a cell-phone, but I have nothing against them.)
--
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:2)
Besides, the Windows deal, X forwarding doesn't let you take control of a program session that's in the middle of being worked on. As such, the project mentioned here (namely, having your desktop follow you around from machine to machine automatically), Just Wouldn't Work with X forwarding.
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:2)
That still doesn't address the issue of your current desktop. My desktop is defined by both the programs that start up when I login, as well as the programs that I currently have up and running. Starting up a remote WM addresses the former, but it doesn't magicially transfer programs that're in the middle of running. If I were in the middle of reading Slashdot on one desktop, even if my desktop contained a thing to auto-start Netscape, I'd still have to manually renavigate to where I was on the site.
www.whydotheavatarshaveapenis.com (Score:2)
Overall - Pretty scary idea, how would you like the %time spent in the bathroom appearing on your performance review, or within 5ft of the printer, or 5ft within the coffee pot.
Does anyone have to say "Big Brother"?
I have this now (Score:2)
Re:I don't like it (Score:2)
No one intends to be "Overly Paranoid"
Re:Of course the real question here is... (Score:2)
This is why I don't own a cellphone (Score:2)
Of course the real question here is... (Score:2)
"Where's Jones?" my boss says as he walks down the hallway.
"Oh, I saw him in the cube farm. Look's like he's working on the 3d building graphics project."
Of course, the boss would never know that what I was really doing was waiting for him around the corner with the rocket launcher and a good ol' boom-stick as backup.
Uhmm... sentient? (Score:2)
While well programmed, this lab isn't sentient or even intelligent...
Re:ugh! (Score:2)
See, I'd qualify that. People don't like being tracked if it dosn't benefit them. Try to pass a law requiring GPS locators in cell phones and you'll have a war on your hands. Make nice nice and say it's really a measure that can allow you to be located if you've been in a car accident or some other dangerous altercation and no one (except us paranoid geeks) will even blink at it.
The fundamental difference is that you and I (and the majority of the Slashdot community) live in an environment where, for some reason or another, paranoia is rewarded, either by our peers or our employers (indirectly). Neal Stephenson does a good job with that concept in Cryptonomicon.
In the end though, we don't make up a substantial part of a voting block. So if "They" decide to really press this technology, there's little short of massed civil disobediance we can really do about it. On a corporate level it's a different story. Leave your "bat" in your cube. Clip your chip laiden ID to your coat and forget to take that with you to the bathroom. If even being in the system bothers you, just don't work there. This kind of thing has to be expensive as hell, not every corp can afford it.
Back to the basic point though. People like being tracked and monitored if they feel like they get something out of it. Why are websites that remember our personal information so successfull? Sure, it's a lesser manifestation of corporate tracking, but we --like-- that sort of personalization. The illusion that the computer remembers who we are and what we like and "cares" enough to make it that way (pretend you're a luser for a sec here ok?) makes the luser feel distinctive. It's a gimic, and it apeals to something deep within our psyche. It is, quite frankly, bunk... but it appeals to us anyhow.
Just be carefull before you say "the people won't stand for this" or "people don't like this" argument. In my experiance capitalism is a really good way for dealing with products no one likes. They don't sell and they die. If people really have as big a problem as you say with this the corporations that use it will flounder and die. The system will die with them and we'll all go home happy.
Ok... I'll shut up now.
This has been another useless post from....
Re:Sun Microsystems has a similar system (Score:2)
I wonder if part of this is for the same reason - I know you get your filestore, desktop and so on, but its still not your computer with its own local drive, humming power-supply fan, and (goddam it), smell.
Well, I have my own development server locked in a room somewhere. I can't hear or smell it, but it's still mine.
Do you try to book the same cuboid every day?
You can only reserve them for five days at a time so I mostly stay in once place all week. But I often don't get the same room. And some rooms are better than others. I can look down a long hallway at the moment, 45 degrees to me left. It's an annoying visual distraction. There's good sound-proofing though. The reservation system also has a few bugs so sometimes, there are collisions. I got bumped a couple weeks ago by another person while I was at lunch. We both had valid reservations. The most annoying thing, though, is that I can't keep my reference books handy. They have lockers (just like high school, no kidding) but that's annoying. And I also can't keep my small lego collection handy.
Not my Cup o' Tea (Score:3)
No slacking! (Score:3)
Also, I like the Sims-esque 3D image. I bet it's a farking blast to watch your coworkers on this thing in realtime.
Cool, so can I? (Score:4)
2) walk into a bathroom stall
3) use the terminal on the back of the door to start playing my newly downloaded song(s)
4) answer the phone there when the RIAA calls?
Big Brother vs. Enabling Technologies (Score:4)
I think this is a really interesting evolution of the smart-card identifier for terminals, creating a mobile desktop. This starts causing the environment to react to the specific presence of the user. From the JavaOne JavaRing demo of knowing what your coffee preference was, up to this system with speaker-specific transcription services, we may finally get to a technological workplace that enables us rather than causes us to conform to yet another interface.
And as the point to ponder, we are going to need to look at the intent more carefully in legislation. Is is now possible to profile people so completely via spending patterns, location, communication tendencies, etc. that unscrupulous corporation could manipulate trends in people reasonably easily. The laws need to adapt to prevent this misuse, and yet enable honest companies and people to provide legitimate, privacy-ensured services to people that want them without fear of this manipulation.
I'm not a lawyer, but that's how the laws started, was to uphold the moral views of the majority. It appears to me that we will need to return there soon, or we will be forced to forego these types of enabling technologies as are shown by AT&T and these other companies.
You wanna rant, do it offline.
You wanna think, do it here.
Re:AT&T Didn't give us VNC (Score:5)
The Olivetti and Oracle Research Labs were acquired by in January 1998 by AT&T Research to form AT&T Labs Cambridge. The same guys work there, doing the same research, under a different banner.
Perhaps moderators need a "This guy is well-meaning but misinformed" option, which demotes the comment, but doesnt detract from the guy's karma? Hmm...
Sun Microsystems has a similar system (Score:5)