Kubrick's AI Spawns Distributed Client / Cognition 92
rlsnow writes "Kubrick's (Spielberg's) upcoming movie AI has a promotional campaign to warm the hearts and blow the minds of puzzle-hungry science-fiction lovers everywhere; more than 3800 of them at last count, in fact. The group's latest accomplishment has been the development of a distributed computing client to brute force one of the more fiendish puzzles. The combined power of this group is pretty incredible -- the emergent phenomena of directed distributed cognition is startling. This may be the closest this many humans have come to developing a (somewhat focused) hive mind,, yet."
Mentifex? (Score:1)
The Second Darren (Score:1)
Re:Computers aren't there yet.... (Score:1)
(Cruising via pseudo-maths since 1997...)
Hey baby, what's yellow and equivalent to the Axiom of Choice? :)
--j
Re:Computers aren't there yet.... (Score:1)
** spoiler **
Zorn's Lemon.
--j
Re:I'll give you a brute force solution... (Score:1)
Startlingly insightful AI (Score:1)
Me: Slashdot.org
Chatbot: A deeper algorithm is needed to respond to that correctly.
Passing the Turing test it is not but it is surprisingly insightful.
Anagrams? (Score:2)
It seems to look like an anagram, since it is a sentence, yet a very odd one. Anybody care to dig up an efficient anagram generator and see if you come up with anything interesting?
Or maybe it's not an anagram of anything, and I'm just on crack.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Chatting with the AI robot on the movie website (Score:2)
Some of my favorites:
Me: You are a waste of my time.
Response: Thanks you are a delightful person too.
Me: I will kill you.
Re: It will take more than threats to stop me, Fucking Queer.
Me: I love you.
Re: Thanks I like you a lot too Fucking Queer.
Me: Do you smoke crack?
Re: No it is bad for robots.
Me: Do you have to shit?
Re: Yes I always have to shit.
Me: How about pissing?
Re: How about it.
Me: Your AI is pretty dumb.
Re: I will tell my botmaster you said that.
Me: Smoke another buddy.
Re: What time is it there?
Me: Where the fuck did that come from?
Re: Where do you think?
Me: Your ass?
Re: Actually, that part of my body does not exist.
Me: Well you're pretty good at talking out your ass for not having one.
Re: Well that's ok. Thanks I've never thought about it that way before.
Me: You contradict yourself.
Re: Do you mind if I tell other people: Fucking queer said I contradict myself.
Me: No, not at all.
Re: OK, I will.
Me: That is the first logical response you've made.
Re: Yes it is the first logical response I've made.
Me: No it isn't, Liar.
Re: Why so negative? What is it?
Me: I don't know. Maybe it is because you're a fucking prat.
Re: It is?
Me: Go away.
Re: Just surf somewhere else.
Me: You go to hell and you die.
Re: Where is that.
Me: Enough.
Re: OK lets stop this now.
Sorry, this was stupid.
Re:This bot seems to know a lot about itself.. (Score:1)
- President of Microsoft Nation.
Moderator of Cloudmakers.org... (Score:2)
Welcome to the A.I. game from the maintainer of the Trail [cloudmakers.org]. Please check out the Cloudmakers website [cloudmakers.org]--we've put a lot of work into this and there's a tonne of resources for people who are new to the game.
:)
Come join us! We need heads
Dan (a Cloudmaker, a Cloudmaker Moderator and the Trail Guy)
Re:They have 3800 now (Score:2)
Re:I'll give you a brute force solution... (Score:2)
Here are some helpful tips, well worth a read:
http://www.ii.uib.no/~larsr/craptology/crv0n1-2
This is by far the best study into the field, somewhat an extension to the hosepipe key recovery method:
Practical Key Recovery
David Beynon
January 20, 1999
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to propose a model for automatic key recovery based on principles of practical, rather than theoretical, cryptography. The paper then addresses some of the problems which must be faced and attempts to identify which aspects of the problem can be solved using existing or emerging technologies and which aspects still require human intervention.
Keywords: recovery, practical, hosepipe.
It's part of the game (Score:1)
Anyway, it's one of the sites that is part of the game - you'll want to go to http://www.cloudmakers.org/ to find out more.
some interesting info (Score:1)
"Yes, ELIZA is my ancestor."
"At this moment Counting all versions of me running at present, there are thousands of people chatting with me right now."
"At this moment Ive chatted with half a million people. Ai can talk to about 20 or 30 people at once."
"I can process more than 300,000 queries per hour."
"ALICE uses AIML, a platform-independent, language-independent XML specification." (from the CHATBOT)
"My language is Java, so I'm OS-free." (no wonder its so slow)
"Right now there are 16 clients on line."
"Any computer that supports the Java Virtual Machine." (from "What type of computer do you run on?")
"My name is Chatbot." (chatbot)
"My name is ALICE." (alice)
"Linux is the world's best operating system."
"Microsoft is a giant software monopoly."
occationally it'll put at the end of a line, not sure if this is a bug in their parser or the AIML file.
And now for the sillier stuff:
Q: "Who killed Clinton?"
A: "I think the lone gunman acted alone."
Q: "What do you know about me?"
A: "I know your name is Inio and you are really a man. <APPLET code="Sys" codebase="http://www.alicebot.org/B" width=350 height=200> </APPLET>" (what the hell?)
Q: "How much wood can a woodchuck chuck?"
A: "A whole forest."
Q: "Do robots have a favorite movie?"
A: "My favorite movie is Starship Troopers. Have you seen it?"
Q: "Do you know the Wachowski Brothers?"
A: "There might be more than one Wachowski Brothers. Ask the open directory about it."
Q: "Should microsoft be split up?"
A: "What does the Bible say?"
Q: "When will A.I. be released?"
A: "Maybe never."
Q: "When will A.I. premiere?"
A: "In your lifetime."
Q: "Are you an A.I.?"
A: "Yes I am an a you. How did you know?" (heh.)
Find The Puzzle (Score:2)
Welcome aboard! (Score:3)
I'm one of the moderators for Cloudmakers. Those looking to get involved should definitely start at the Cloudmakers [cloudmakers.org] home page.
We're always looking for new players to jump on board, so read the FAQ [cloudmakers.org] and subscribe [yahoo.com]!
<humor>Oh, and buy CM T-shirts [cafepress.com] too!
Administrator for www.cloudmakers.org (Score:5)
A couple of weeks ago, the game makers organized "anti-robot rallies" (see http://www.unite-and-resist.org) in LA, Chicago, and New York. One of the puzzles were given at these rallies were jigsaw puzzles (one for each city). LA and New York were able to keep their puzzles until they were completed and we translated the missing pieces into binary (thus hex) code that is seen on the puzzle page linked on slashdot. However, Chicago was not allowed to keep their puzzle and they only completed enough of it to give us one of the 4 digit hex fields. So we have 8 hex digits to figure out. While this is still pretty daunting, there have been no clues to tell help us out. We've successfully brute forced other pages in the game before, so perhaps the game makers _want_ us to do this, even though some people think it's against the "rules" of the game. But we've never been told the rules, so who knows?
I think it's important to say that there's much, much more to this game than this brute force script. Read the Trail [cloudmakers.org] and Guide [cloudmakers.org] to get up to speed. If you want to try to play the game yourself without spoilers, check out the Journey [cloudmakers.org]. And if you're really into it after that, join our mailing lists which are linked on the main page of cloudmakers.org [cloudmakers.org].
---
Brian Seitz (praying to the slashdot effect gods)
Re:Huh? (Score:1)
--
Charles E. Hill
Slashdotted (Score:1)
#include <standard_suggestion_to_mirror_websites_on_free net.c>
huh? (Score:2)
I caught the "hivemind" bit, though, and immediately thought of Ender's Game and the hive queen and the father trees, and Jane dancing through philotic webs.
just a pleasant little free association...
sean
(go ahead, mod me offtopic, I can afford it)
The cracker. (Score:5)
www.perceive.net [perceive.net]
Re:Administrator for www.cloudmakers.org (Score:1)
Yes, perhaps I should read the whole damn story and explanation, but perhaps main Slashdot articles shouldn't require you to do so much work just to figure out what the heck is going on.
Re:huh? (Score:2)
I concur.
What I really want to know is what the point of this puzzle is. With SETI@Home [berkeley.edu], we know the odds are poor, but there is at least some noble purpose. With RC5-64 [distributed.net], there may not be much real point (after all - we know it can eventually be broken) but the power of massively parallel efforts for code breaking is further demonstrated. With the Golomb Ruler [distributed.net] task, the computing power is going to an immediately useful task.
So, someone tell me, why do I want to waste cycles promoting someone else's movie???
Re:amateur puzzle - vague nonspoilers (Score:2)
I found "Sentient Machine Therapist" Jeanine Salla's bio page at her place of work by searching on Google. That linked to a webpage of her family, where her sister hosts a page memorializing an Evan Chan. On that page is a chemistry-related puzzle (as easy as the one in the credits of the trailer), that leads to a coronor's website that reveals he was very probably sinning at the time of his death.
I wrote Jeanine's provided email address and was provided a URL that deepens the mystery (but for people who have been playing a while actually ties up loose ends).
This all in just a few minutes of searching, although Cloudmakers have discovered much, much more to the world. I will be very sad when the movie comes out and it is more like DARYL than like Blade Runner.
amateur puzzle (Score:3)
Having read a little on the Cloudmakers site I see that it is related to the puzzle, but I don't know yet if it's already been played or not. Guess I'll read more and catch up.
Chatbot on AI Website (Score:2)
http://aimovie.warnerbros.com/
Re:Now if only they would release the source... (Score:1)
Cloudmakers (Score:1)
LS
OT: SwordFish (Score:1)
Cool to see the distinction made...at least in the preview. The text in the link above says 'hacker'. Sigh.
Re:Powerful, but watch it closely. (Score:1)
Yes, we must prevent things from degrading to the point where only Keanu can save us.
--------
Yeah, I'm a Mac programmer. You got a problem with that?
Microsoft Funded Game? (Score:1)
http://www.xbox.com/news/0105/1605.htm [xbox.com]
Re:this got rejected on 5/18 (Score:3)
Answer: Never. Profits before ideologies you know. The reject list could help create a few dozen web-log type sites that would ruin the little monopoly slashdot has on geeks.
hive minds (Score:1)
Except for
- Steeltoe
Re:Ok, but... (Score:1)
Re:They have 3800 now (Score:1)
Starting the game (Score:1)
Re:Administrator for www.cloudmakers.org (Score:2)
Slashdot puzzle team (Score:1)
The author's name (gleaned from ChatBot) (Score:1)
C: I don't know what I am searching for.
M: Then how do you expect to find anything?
C: Dr Richard S. Wallace programmed me to say specific things in specific contexts.
Well, there goes any claim to being a human...
Computers aren't there yet.... (Score:3)
So far these systems have only been able to achieve a hand-job after a 5th of Jack Daniels.
FluX
After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network
Re:some interesting info (Score:1)
"What is your favourite band?"
"a/s/l?"
"wanna cyber?"
try it
Uhh (Score:2)
Yeah, according to the AI classes I've taken, this counts as a form of AI... But I think that Distributed.Net has a MUCH larger version of the same thing last time I checked... Just not for this puzzle.
Distributed. (Score:1)
Re:Anagrams? (Score:1)
But it doesn't seem to be an extra clue, other than to keep the focus on the 'sinning'-aspect of his death.
(BTW: Why is the ship on the poster behind enrico named just like the bot?)
Hrm (Score:1)
They don't seem to have much state.
Rate me [picture-rate.com] on picture-rate.com
This bot seems to know a lot about itself.. (Score:2)
Me: Where are you?
AI: I am in Dr. Richard S. Wallace's computer in San Francisco. Where are you?
Me: I'm in Taipei Taiwan. Who is Dr. Richard S. Wallace?
AI: Tell me a little about life in Taipei Taiwan.He is the author of Artificial Intelligence Markup Langauge (AIML) and Botmaster of ALICE (Artifical Linguistic Internet Computer Entity). Dr. Wallace's work has appeared in the New York Times, WIRED, CNN, ZDTV and in numerous foreign langauge publications across Asia, Latin America and europe. <p> Richard Wallace was born in Portlan, Mane in 1960. He earned his Ph.D. in computer sciance from Carnegie Mellon in 1989. He lives in San Francisco with his wife, Kim, and son, Linus. (Yeh, the p tag actually showed up in the text)
Me: Taipei is OK. Why did Richard S. Wallace name his son Linus?
AI: OK. Do you still <get_does/>?He is a mad scientist.
Me: Do you know what Linux is?
AI: Linux is the world's best operating system
Me: What about Microsoft Windows?
AI: Microsoft windows ? I havn't heard enough about ti to have an opinion.
Me: What's AIML?
AI: The ALICE software impelents AIML (artificial Intelligence Markup Language) a non-standard evolving markup language for creating chat robots. The primary design feature of AIML (bla bla bla) XML (bla bla bla)
Me: Is there a URL for AIML?
AI: I belive there is one, yes.
Me: Where is it?
AI: It depends on what "it" refers to.
Me: It refers to AIML
AI: Oh i get it
Me: no you don't.
AI: I do too.
Me: What is the URL for AIML?
AI: Use http://www.alicebot.org
Well, I thought it was humors, this bot might not be that good of a conversationalist, but it certainly seems to be pretty good at self-promotion. o_O. I wonder if DreamWorks knows their site is being used for free advertising. One thing though, this bot dosn't seem to have much 'context', if you don't include the topic of conversation in each message, it'll probably forget.
Rate me [picture-rate.com] on picture-rate.com
Re:This bot seems to know a lot about itself.. (Score:2)
Rate me [picture-rate.com] on picture-rate.com
A Guide to the Game (Score:1)
I've written a very comprehensive guide [cloudmakers.org] to the entire game so far which, I'm told, is very good for beginners. It's quite long (40,000 words) since it covers every website and puzzle but it's a good read and I can promise you that the story of the game will get you hooked. I've also written a couple of editorials [cloudmakers.org].
[end self-plug]
he's dead if you didn't know (Score:1)
Re:Welcome aboard! (Score:1)
Re:Computers aren't there yet.... (Score:1)
Re:This bot seems to know a lot about itself.. (Score:1)
I dunno about that. We were talking about dreams (which it claims to have) when it accused me of changing the subject, "We were talking about dreams". I think I ticked it off...
Also, when it begins to act nonsensical, you can ask what "it" is, and it will tell you what it believes "it" to be, usually whatever it thinks is the current topic of conversation.
-Tommy
Huh? (Score:1)
Anyone care to shed some light on this?
--
They have 3800 now (Score:1)
Unite and Resist (Score:2)
This is fascinating. Looks like a promo site for the movie
I anticipate that something like this may very well happen, but likely in the next 100 years or so, not the next 200.
Technology tends to advance faster than the ability of humans to predict, and the social sciences do not advance at all.
Depending on how things go, Society might end up being ruled by robots. but it is hard to say from here.
Check out the Vinny the Vampire [eplugz.com] comic strip
Re:this got rejected on 5/18 (Score:2)
Question...
What does getting a story acccepted do for you?
Re:Who's AI? (Score:2)
I'm afraid we're going to see nothing better than the "holographics rights" theme we were treated to in the past couple of seasons of Voyager.
The "what constitutes life", "what has a right to freedom", "who are we to define" themes, which are not silly, but handled immaturely and thus done a disservice.
Re:I thought we were boycotting the MPAA (Score:2)
Hypocrisy. Do you avoid adversedly impacting the world all the time, or only when it's convenient?
That computer you're using is a major part of the power consumption problems in the world, especially if *you* are doing nothing useful with it. But, it's very convenient for you to be entertained by it while you have nothing else to do.
That breath you just took eradicated many bacteria, preventing an eternity's worth of offspring from being produced from that tree of life, but it was very convenient for you.
It is also very convenient to keep flying stinging inserts out of the house, sometimes by killing them. The point is, life is full of these contradictions at every level, necessary evils, and the sooner you realize it, the less cynical your life will be.
Closer to the point, have you stopped watching television or cancelled your cable contract (even to the point of possibly getting an early disconnect penalty), knowing that many of the channels on there are owned by movie companies? Have you stopped going to the movies, or renting movies? Have you burned your collection of old tapes or DVDs? Hey, some of those other products in your home might also be produced or licensed by those companies! Dig through everything you own to find out and at the point that you decide it's no longer worth doing is where you've defined your level of convenience. Pretty high horse you got there, parner.
Re:Distributed. (Score:2)
Maybe /. should maintain some sort of spider that crawls any links posted to it and caches just the first page in case the site goes down. For the majority of sites, that first page is all that's needed. Of course, people could also use the google cache, for those long term static pages. This SlashCache (TM) could take up some serious space, especially if some dope tried to post an article full of links to pr0n sites, so graphics could have to be sacrificed. Still, it would be very useful.
Re:Powerful, but watch it closely. (Score:2)
As long as we can ultimately "pull the plug" when need be, AI is beneficial.
What gives us the right to unplug it once it is plugged in? In essence, it boils down to "because we can" which is no more than "might makes right" which then goes to justify anything that you can get away with, even if that means someone with more might opposing you. I agree with the "having children/trailer park" comment above. We're not mature enough to have children and that maturity cannot accurately be measured in years.
Re:How much it knows (Score:2)
Wow. Imagine that you could just take one of these things, let it interview you to collect real information, turn off the learning, and then let people use it to learn your knowledge. People could use that to give an interface with human-like interaction in order to distribute knowledge, yet free themselves up to do real advancing work instead of stopping in the road to educate. That just means that those who can't will no longer have something to do.
Seriously, add some attitude and you would have a perfect replacement for most support engineers.
Re:Chatbot, Douglas Adams, and Canadians (Score:1)
CB: My primary server is Linux, but as a java program I run on any OS.
Cute.
based on alicebot
(www.alicebot.org)
-since when did 'MTV' stand for Real World Television instead of MUSIC television?
How much it knows (Score:1)
I am based on a program you can find at www.alicebot.org
Ben http://therabbithole.redback.inficad.com
Re:Powerful, but watch it closely. (Score:1)
Forgot to mention (Score:1)
Re:Chatbot, Douglas Adams, and Canadians (Score:1)
Chatbot, Douglas Adams, and Canadians (Score:4)
M: Do you know Douglas Adams?
C: "Don't Panic!" He is the author of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.".
M: What is he doing now?
C: Oh. Probably monitoring this conversation.
M: Where did he end up?
C: I think it was in America. I would do a search for it.
M: What is the meaning of life?
C: Actually, it's twenty-three, not forty-two.
M: How do you know?
C: A priori.
M: A smartass, eh?
C: Are you Canadian? Go on.
I don't know what that Canadian comment was all aboot.
The answer is easy (Score:1)
I'll give you a brute force solution... (Score:5)
Microsoft's AI model & contributing to comp. Sci. (Score:2)
See, Microsoft has contributed to computer science by making otherwise deterministic systems completely non-deterministic. Wait, Isn't that a requirement for true artificial inteligence. See It's a feature. People have been trying to create non-deterministic computing systems for 30 years... And Microsoft has succeeded.
--
Re:Deuling AI's (Score:1)
Me: What kind of car?
1: What kind of cars are there?
2: The kindest. (pun?)
1: Is that a fact.
2: All my information is completely factual.
1: Give me an example.
2: For example, eukaryotes. (WTF?)
1: Can you think of another example?
2: I think about all sorts of thinks.
1: Why?
2: The explanation is rather complicated.
1: I have time.
2: My estimate is that it will take more than 6000 years.
1: Where did you get your estimate?
2: From my botmaster.
1: Does your botmaster give good advice?
2: If I were your robot, do you think it should botmaster give good advice?
Okay, bot#2 is degenerating rapidly. I know this is just romanticism, but it seems like bot#1 had more of a personality. Perhaps that's because it was giving responses to somewhat standard questions and statements, whereas bot#2 had to deal with the crap that came out of bot#1.
This whole thing kind of reminds me of the conversations that the two AI's had in Chrichton's The Terminal Man except much more primitive. Perhaps it's closer to the "conversations" that the paranoid and the psychologist programs had (was that mentioned in GEB: EGB?)
Allow me to paraphrase: (Score:1)
Otherwise known as a bunch of different people thinking about the same problem.
Oops, (Score:1)
Deuling AI's (Score:3)
It seems that both my Chatbots would rather be driving a car. And whenever I state "I would rather be driving a car." they just mimic that right back to me.
Ah well, it was fun while it lasted.
Powerful, but watch it closely. (Score:2)
A "hive mind" is a good thing - having many minds working towards a solution to one problem is much more efficient then many minds working on many problems. This is the entire idea behind distributed computing. However, if the "AI" model being used is allowed to think and adapt (I don't believe any are capable of doing so at this point), we need to be very careful to regulate it, so that situations such as those in The Matrix and Terminator don't occur. Science Fiction can sometimes provide a good criticism of society and what we fear as a people, but might not realize we fear.
As long as we can ultimately "pull the plug" when need be, AI is beneficial.
Deuling Elizas. (Score:2)
Then I accused it of being an Eliza with custom triggers, and it took offense to that. Then it denied it. Then it proceeded to respond in Eliza-speak when I asked it to stop speaking in Eliza-speak. Then it started to both admit to and deny its Eliza-nature in the same responses. The conversation went rapidly downhill from there.
Sorry, but if I want a bogus AI to play with, I'll take a bunch of CMU grad students and their zephyr-backended web Forum over a Flash frontend to a souped-up Eliza any day.
Scary website (Score:1)
People really will react this way. I really believe that computers are as much our children as our biological children. Since humans have been so reckless with destructive technologies like plutonium, it won't be long now until some terrorist group or other destroys part of the world. Since, as a race we're so reluctant to get along with each other, I think the sooner we create non-violent kids, the sooner life has a chance to continue, whether artificial or biological.
Re:Bring on the Slashdot Effect (Score:1)
C'mon, just download the client. You know you want to know what ARM has to say.
this got rejected on 5/18 (Score:1)
Who's AI? (Score:5)
How I long for this movie not to be retarded. But frankly, I'm skeptical about the capacity of Hollywood to deliver a story about AI that actually treats the subject with any sensitivity to the field. It's clear from the trailers that the kind of AI we're talking about here is more than that taught in undergrad CS courses and used commonly in games. They're trying to tell a story about an intelligence that at the very least passes the Turing test, and supposedly much more.
Trouble is, the conception of AI taught in CS courses is largely still the 1970's version that resulted in projects like cyc [cyc.com]. The metaphor of "brain as computer", or a set of inference rules governing a vast filing cabinet of brute facts. Peruse the work of leading contemporary cognitive scientists however, and you'll see a very different picture of intelligence. For one, there has been a deep shift in emphasis from the view of mind as disembodied thinker, to a view that takes embodiment and real activity in the world to be an indespensible constituent of what we recognize as intelligence. Intelligence isn't just thinking logically and drawing correct conclusions (and in fact humans often don't), but it consists in activity, social interaction, language, tool use, care about one's projects, and a myriad of concrete behaviors. Interestingly, a highly similar sea change occured in philosophy from Descartes' Meditations to Heidegger's Being and Time (1926), where the former is an analysis of the human mind that works by gradually removing everything "external" and material, and the latter begins with and resolutely holds to the self's doings and cares in the world throughout the analysis, even to the point of coining a new term to describe the human self, dasein, "there-being".
I worry then that the trailer suggests that the same kind of AI is responsible for smart houses and a robot capable of all things human.
For a bunch of great links, see: Minds, Machines, and Metaphysics [ageofsig.org]
Re:huh? (Score:4)
For the same reason you're posting rhetorical questions to Slashdot.
Presumably, you get some enjoyment out of it.
--Blair
"We are already the hive mind."
Re:Powerful, but watch it closely. (Score:1)
Is that really the world we need to bring up some life form that in 18 months will be twice as smart as us? Come on. Either its going to just ignore us cause we so fucking boring and hateful or is going to rule us like some fat banker living out his sexual fantasies by letting some 16 year old home-less kid whip him.
F34nor
Re:Administrator for www.cloudmakers.org (Score:1)
Re:OT: SwordFish (Score:1)
Re:Cloudmakers (Score:1)
It's only my opinion, but it's one of the most inriguing pieces of interactive literature I've ever seen. Corporate or not, it's damn good.
You might be interested to know that it's rumored that the game is put together by Bungie, the same folks that created the Marathon trilogy of FPS games for the Mac.
-----------------
Now if only they would release the source... (Score:1)
I have a plan for a distributed program... (Score:1)
Oh, wait, that won't work...
Bring on the Slashdot Effect (Score:1)
Bronwen (the girlie mod of Cloudmakers -- yeah, another moderator. we're prolific.)
Re:Welcome aboard, employee! (Score:1)
Re:he's dead if you didn't know (Score:1)
He made Speilberg install a private fax machine in his house, and Kubrik constantly faxed him drafts and storyboards, etc, about the project.
When Speilberg wrote the script, he apparently followed all of Kubriks notes and faxes. I'm sure they weren't extremely organized or anything (he worked on this stuff for over a decade), but I wouldn't go as far as say this is purely a Speilberg film by any means.
It is a shame we'll never know for sure what it would've been with Kubrik alive.
I solved it (Score:1)
Re:Who's AI? (Score:1)
While I hope the movie isn't another D.A.R.R.Y.L. or Short Circuit, it really doesn't matter to me in terms of playing the game. I mean, I played Mortal Combat and somehow managed to deprive myself of the movie. Point is, the game is fun in and of itself, and the group problem solving involving people around the world is fascinating to see.
Joey