Help Stress Test The New Slashdot 280
Here's you chance to generate wasteful http traffic without even having to run unpatched IIS! We're ready to test Banjo, our new fancy setup w/ new code and new hardware. We plan to keep testing until we think
the system is ready. You are also welcome to submit Bug Reports, although it would be helpful if you skimmed the list of bugs before submitting new ones so we don't have 300 of you tell us that your user info page has other people's comments listed on it again. The new hardware is mostly in place, but the code hasn't been fully optimized yet, so run your wgets... write your bots... whatever makes you happy, but please don't be malicious: just try to load and submit web pages. And don't be surprised, its gonna go up and down like a yo yo as we fix things.
SUPERSPANDEXSPACEGHOST! (Score:1)
5p4c39#057 15 13373r t#4n t4c0'5 m07#3r!
*has an aneurism*
Bug Report (Score:1, Redundant)
can you imagine (Score:2)
Stress report results: (Score:2)
A better name would be 'bubba' (Score:2)
The Ultimate Stress Test (Score:1, Funny)
i dont know about you, but computer illiterate people standing over me while i fix something - expecting to learn something - stresses me out big time.
Get the config right (Score:1)
Mandatory "All your base" "joke". (Score:1)
(Well, the slashdot effect replies were even more mandatory, but I was too late to add one of them - I do have some standards even if you can't tell from my posts. ... I'll go and take my medicine now, OK?)
Much better HTML now... (Score:2)
Hmm, alright..... (Score:1)
It seemed a lot faster... but then I realized the load is probably much less than slashdot.org. So I have to dismiss that much.
Is there a "new features" list somewhere? What's the difference? And also, will Slashdot ever get a new interface/design?
Just whining 'cause I can...
Ever consider... (Score:1)
Down? (Score:2)
banjo... BANJO.... BANJOOOOOOO (Score:2)
Suggestion for E2 linkage (Score:5, Interesting)
That would be a little more [goatse.cx|efficient].
Re:Suggestion for E2 linkage (Score:1)
yo-yo (Score:2)
> down like a yo yo as we fix things.
How is that any different from REGULAR slashdot over the past couple weeks?
-Chris
Yes.. but can you log it? (Score:1)
Oh the humanity.
Linuxrunner
Banjo-NT (Score:1)
The mighty airship down in flames.
Oye (Score:1)
So basically /. wants to erm /. itself (Score:1)
hmmm
knock out? (Score:1)
I see what you're up to Taco! (Score:3, Informative)
Uh-huh (Score:2)
Here's you chance to generate wasteful http traffic without even having to run unpatched IIS!
That's Score: -1, Troll in my book
Oh well, let's have a look if the new
slashdotted? (Score:1, Redundant)
Is http://banjo.slashdot.org/ slashdotted already?
doesn't look different (Score:1)
what exactly is new in the new slashcode (from the one the current slashdot uses)?
Re:doesn't look different (Score:2, Informative)
Re:doesn't look different (Score:3, Informative)
I don't think look & feel is supposed to be very different, this is about the code behind the scenes.
Email Spam-Proofing (Score:1)
It may seem petty, but I must take exception to this one item listed in the user information pages:
"Show your real email address without cowering behind childish anonymity or obfuscation."
Excuse me, but the last time I posted my email address on Slashdot (by mistake), it started a torrent of spam that still has not stopped. Email filters can only go so far.
What in the world is wrong with wanting to avoid useless email? I'm not posting as "Anonymous Coward"; isn't that good enough for you?
There's also the fact that some people prefer to creatively obfuscate their email address their way and post clues or instructions on how to decode it in their signature. I think that's pretty cool... Oh well...
Change list (Score:3, Insightful)
Is there a list of advantages/improvements of the new version?
Re:Change list (Score:3, Informative)
http://slashcode.com/docs/CHANGES [slashcode.com]
Re:Change list (Score:3, Informative)
Less than ten posts, and Banjo already /.'ed. (Score:1)
Hit! Hit! Hit! (Score:2)
Never a script kiddie around when you really need one.
I'm coining a new bit o' jargon. (Score:1)
Um... (Score:2, Redundant)
Re:Um... (Score:2, Troll)
I've tried,... but its slashdotted! (Score:1)
Re:I've tried,... but its slashdotted! (Score:1)
.Sigs (Score:2)
Hope for Banjo (Score:5, Insightful)
I hope to GOD that the new version of Slashdot will include the actual YEAR in comments, stories, and everything else. I realize that for stories and comments we can look up in the year for the (non-Y2K compliant) year, but it's just annoying.
I am sick of:
Posted by CmdrTaco on Thursday August 16, @11:13AM
by BigBlockMopar (slant6mopar@I.HATE.SPAM.yahoo.com) on Thursday August 16, @11:21AM CST (#5)
(not that I have anything against CmdrTaco and BigBlockMopar)
and
You have moderator access and 5 points. Welcome to the those of you just joining: please read the moderator guidelines for instructions. (updated 9.9!)
After clicking it is revealed that this is September 9th, 1999, almost TWO YEARS AGO.
I should probably be bitching to people who actually do the code (or fix it my own self) but I just have to vent. After a couple years it starts to build up.
Goodbye karma!
Re:Hope for Banjo (Score:1)
And every time I see the (Updated 9.9!) I think, "oh, i better read that".. I always thought it meant version 9.9, not 9/9/??.
Re:Hope for Banjo (Score:3, Interesting)
I realize that for stories and comments we can look up in the URL for the (non-Y2K compliant) year, but it's just annoying.
Ian
Re:Hope for Banjo (Score:2)
eg:
Hope for Banjo (Score:5)
by zsazsa (ianatpolpodotorg) on 07:26 PM August 16th, 2001 (#2127441)
Looks like we already slashdotted Banjo. (Score:2)
Re:Looks like we already slashdotted Banjo. (Score:1)
Or one could say something like: "Guess you could say we strumed the banjo a bit to hard. Ha Ha Ha!" for a few points...
Re:Looks like we already slashdotted Banjo. (Score:2)
He's Dead Jimbo.
Stress Test Slashdot? (Score:5, Funny)
Banjo
The name "banjo" stresses me too much already.
I expect Kermit to start singing any second.
Re:Stress Test Slashdot? (Score:1)
Kermit stresses you?
I heard "banjo" and was thinking more "This router don't go to Aintry..."
Shiver.
Re:Stress Test Slashdot? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Stress Test Slashdot? (Score:2)
Re:Banjo jokes are dumb (Score:1, Flamebait)
This big-mouthed kike is sure to be added onto my gassing list.
There, there. After a five minute visit with the Mohel, you'll be feeling a lot better.
Journal Whoring (Score:2)
The amount of journal whoring (posting inane crap to your journal just to get to the top of the journal list) was almost unbelievable. It looks like they've disabled that list.
Of course, I have to wonder what the utility of the journal is, given that I could create a thread at any time on the current slashdot just by entering a URL. I guess that making it an eaiser feature will increase it's use. I'm just not sure that is such a good thing.
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Web servers off: DB server acting up (Score:3, Interesting)
bizarre errors (Score:2)
Re:Web servers off: DB server acting up (Score:5, Funny)
010815 12:16:10
010815 12:16:12
010815 12:16:13
010815 12:16:14
010815 12:16:15
Ahh, I see what the problem is.
Re:Web servers off: DB server acting up (Score:1)
My wish list for the new Slashdot: (Score:2)
(Not that these will necessarily come true, but I can hope :)
So does this mean... (Score:2)
Hey... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: Squeal like a Piggy (Score:1)
I didn't see CmdrTaco in the credits...
I Sincerely Apologize (Score:5, Funny)
I'm writing this note to apologize. I think I broke your new server. You said the new hardware and software were maybe not completely configured yet, but I clicked on the link anyway, and now I think your server is down.
I'm really sorry, I didn't mean to break anything, I know I should be more careful in the future. Hope this doesn't set you back too far.
Sincerely,
rkent
Re:I Sincerely Apologize (Score:2)
slashdot the slashdot? (Score:2)
-CrackElf
So... (Score:2, Redundant)
Every cloud has a silver lining... (Score:5, Funny)
/Janne
Hrmm, I wonder... (Score:5, Funny)
One more post about Banjo being slashdotted, and I'm going to scream.
Re:Hrmm, I wonder... (Score:1)
Yo-yo (Score:3, Funny)
And this is different from the current servers how?
Sorry, I would have posted this sooner, but it took 5 minutes for comments.pl to load.
Banjo Video clip (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Banjo Video clip (Score:2)
Re:Banjo Video clip (Score:2)
Banjoooo!!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Why, Banjo, WHY?!"
-carl
Re:Banjoooo!!!!! (Score:3, Funny)
"Oh, you can take that, eh? Well let's raise it a few hundred volts...."
Help stress test the new Slashdot (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Help stress test the new Slashdot (Score:3, Funny)
I guess you could call it the Cluster's Last Stand....
Re:Help stress test the new Slashdot (Score:3, Funny)
"We came. We saw. We kicked its ass." -- Bill Murray, _Ghostbusters
Changes - includes better posting history (Score:5, Funny)
. . .
finally I can see my posting history from more than a week or so back.
I've never been a very frequent poster, but this is one reason why I've trailed off for months and months.
The search engine hasn't ever - in my recollection - thrown back at me my complete earlier posts, and user info has been extremely restricted to maybe the most recent couple of weeks. I once even resorted to a google search, but only came up with posts from literally ages ago.
This may sound like I'm being self obsessed. But here's why this annoyed me :
On /. I'm not holding a conversation in the way I am with someone in person. Sure I may hold a short - term memory of the poster's handle to whom I replied, or the topic of the story. But that's about it. Conversing on - line simply doesn't have the cues and triggers for recall like talking with someone in person. There's so little secondary information or impressions to rely on.
I'm not talking about staring back at how I managed to get some karma either (tho' it's nice:) but to try and understand the context of my thoughts at the time. By looking back I can see how stupid or even, maybe, informed I was. That helps me learn.
It brings me back, because I can better relate to my earlier experience of /. and what meant something enough for me to write, edit and post, hopefully in a grammatical fashion. Now all that I want is a _full_ record of my posts.
I guess some people might find some privacy concerns over this (given that even google doesn't seem to find everything I posted) but then I'll trade that for the learning experience, and the ability to find the souls (by handle at least) who provoked me to though in the first instance.
I would have posted a link to my user search on banjo.slashdot.org but then it's down;) Something for you guys to stress test I guess?
Re:Changes - includes better posting history (Score:2)
Thus making me look even stupider. Wait, is that how you spell stupider?
Where did "Banjo" come from? (Score:2, Informative)
comes from one of the main Slashgeeks - Pudge.
he is a Perlgod and he has a super-cool black lab dog named Banjo.
Banjo completely rules, and if you ever get the chance to meet him, (banjo, not pudge), you're a lucky person indeed.
oh, and Pudge - "READ A BOOK!"
Re:Where did "Banjo" come from? (Score:2)
Journal comments (somewhat OT) (Score:2, Interesting)
Banjo (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, New Slashdot,
Don't you fail on me,
I've given you new hardware,
To keep Banjo from its knees.
New Hardware? (Score:5, Funny)
The new hardware is mostly in place
Yes, but did you connect it?
security (Score:2, Funny)
My last fifteen minutes (Score:5, Funny)
10:19am PST -- trying to load a page
10:20am PST -- give up; read The Register
10:22am PST -- trying to load
10:24am PST -- give up, try to find a security hold in Windows
10:24am PST -- done; try and reload Banjo
10:27am PST -- give up
10:34am PST -- submit comment to the good 'ole Slasdhot
I want my 15 minutes back.
Re:My last fifteen minutes (Score:1)
Moahahaha, and so on.
Re:My last fifteen minutes (Score:2)
Security Hold... huh? Is that where they put all security that's missing from the rest of Windows? Tell me if you find it!
Uh oh (Score:2)
Re:/.ed (Score:1)
Does anyone else see the irony in this?
-sid
Re:/.ed (Score:2)
Re:I don't know if this is exactly on subject, but (Score:1)
or
"Whoo - first reply to first post"
Re:I don't know if this is exactly on subject, but (Score:2, Interesting)
Yeah, it was in a comment. Here it is:
[ from `slashd' in slash-0.90.tar.gz ]
# I suppose I'll let the secret out: for a few months, before the moderation
# system came into being, this little function faked "First Posts" and then
# deleted them when a real comment came along. Worked pretty well, and nobody
# figured it out. I disabled it when the moderation came online feeling that
# it was a cleaner solution. -CT
Re:Oops (Score:1)
[Scene: CmdrTaco, standing in front of a mirror.]
Mirror: >CRACK<
[Scene: Andux, staring at his user info, speaking in the third person, watching his karma slowly trickle away...]
Andux: Um... No offense, Taco!
[Scene: Back at the mirror.]
CmdrTaco: ...I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me!
Re:Check out this damn lunatic (Score:1)
thats more than a little frightening
Re:Banjo slashdotted? (Score:2)
"And don't be surprised, its gonna go up and down like a yo yo as we fix things."
Re:Not a flamebait but.. (Score:3, Informative)
And sure, the "right" way is to fire up ab and go to town, and we've done that to some extent already. But nothing simulates the load on slashdot like the load on slashdot.
And we're still in bug-finding mode, for that matter. Submit them if you find them.
Is that the same load balancing switch (Score:2)
Not quite ontopic, but I'm gonna ask anyway... (Score:2)
Since I couldn't find any answers to either or the questions (and I did look in both stories), I have to ask two things:
Just curious :) ...
Re:Not a flamebait but.. (Score:3, Insightful)
This goes for every good software development team, external testing is VITAL in order to maintain quality. Try to make a good product, let the actual users test the product, help them submit improvement proposals/bug reports, and prepare to recode the whole thing :-)