9-Track Open Reel Tape Production Ends This Year 245
Robogeek writes: "eMag, the last maker of 9-track open-reel tapes, has announced that it will cease production of the product in 2002. The full story is here. The end of an era. We just packed up and shipped off our last 9-track mainframe drive for scrap. The thing was the size of a refrigerator, but when we had a bank of 9 of them going full-blast it sure gave the place a cool sci-fi feel. No more spin-spin, whir-whir... (sigh)
'Please stop, Dave. My mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it ...'"
What a good way to play geekier than though (Score:1)
I was actually using one in 1994, mailing houses apparently bought address lists on 9 track tape.
Re:What a good way to play geekier than though (Score:2)
Does "LOAD TAPE" or "@load" or somesuch count?
(it's been so damn long that I can't remember the command. I do know that I used to be a wizard at EBCDIC->ASCII and block conversions, though.)
(*used* to be. the things I've forgotten...*sigh*)
Re:What a good way to play geekier than though (Score:2)
Re:What a good way to play geekier than though (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What a good way to play geekier than though (Score:2, Funny)
"The geekiest pissing game" (Score:2)
Poor people who grew up with the boring DOS have no interesting story, I guess. There's a gap of one generation of people who grew up with the mainframe, and those who grew up with Linux. Now, those who grew up with DOS, what are you gonna do?
Re:"The geekiest pissing game" (Score:2, Interesting)
yes yes I know some of you THINK it can't be done but that's what the EMS standard was originally for.
Why they ever emulated the XT memory upgrade interface on the 386 is beond me.
Re:"The geekiest pissing game" (Score:2, Funny)
"The real DOS programmers use 'COPY CON FILENAME.EXE" for example.
Or one that happened to me - talking a (l)user over the phone through using edlin to configure kermit as a terminal program for a user on Win 3.1 over a DOS version too old to have EDIT.EXE (what was that, DOS 3.3?)
Naturally, for sake of Murphy as well as bonus points, I hadn't touched edlin for some 3 years before that call.
I don't know whether to scream or pat my back on that one.
Re:What a good way to play geekier than though (Score:2)
Couldn't resist.
Re:What a good way to play geekier than though (Score:3, Interesting)
My format was a lot nicer, using all 8 bits (shorting load time) and breaking things up into blocks of 256 words, each with a checksum. If you got a checksum error you only had to back up one block rather than reload the whole damned program.
Getting this to work was one of the things that made me realize that writing software was what I wanted to do for a living.
I was in High School and the machine was a PDP-8/S (serial, 36 usecs to add two numbers) that travelled around between several schools, staying several weeks in one place and used to teach programming.
Most of the PDP-8 world used either reliable high-speed (300 CPS) optical paper tape readers, DECtape, or disks. 32 KW head-per-track drives, oh boy! or the RF08 that was 256 KW? something gigantic like that. We had one at the local science museum that died one day when a water-filled exhibit on the floor above dropped its load and gave the drive a shower.
Random thoughts from a former tape-ape (Score:5, Funny)
- putting the little silver part on the tape a few feet down so that we could test multiple tape logic
- carrying a whole bunch of tapes on your arm so you looked like the michelin man
- playing ring toss with the write rings
- trying to get all the colors of the olympic logo in write rings!!
- speculating what sized building you could wrap a mag tape around (we never got around to seeing if it would make it around the Pontiac Silverdome)
- tex wipes: you could take anything off of anything with these things.. too bad they had CFC's in them.
- When my direct deposit arrived at the credit union, it had exactly one record on it because I was the only person who worked where i did who had an account at that credit union.
- manually threading.. what fun!!
-bob
Yepp... sweet memories... *sigh* (Score:2, Interesting)
Damn! (Score:4, Funny)
Risk of historical loss (Score:4, Informative)
In the mid-80s, 9-track tape was pretty much the standard medium used to archive data. That's what Henry Spencer used, for example, to save the Usenet traffic of the 80s. I wonder how much history will be lost as all these tapes become unreadable.
Re:Risk of historical loss (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Risk of historical loss (Score:1)
Re:Risk of historical loss (Score:2)
But seriously, just because the medium is no longer manufactured doesn't mean that all the machines to READ the 9-track tape are going away. There are still 8 track tape decks in service, despite the fact that it's probably been over 15 years since an 8 track tape (or deck!) was made...
Re:Risk of historical loss (Score:3)
This is why NASA is having difficulty holding on to data... by the time a dataset is archived, it needs to be transferred to a new tape!
Which SCSI? (Score:2)
As for finding tapes, I'm sure that some will continue to come up in bargain bins if you search hard enough...
Re:Which SCSI? (Score:3, Informative)
>might have a challenge getting a host adaptor
>capable of talking to it
Actually, one of the beauties of SCSI is that it is fully forwards and backwoards compatible; i.e. to SCSI-1 devices should work on an Ultra320 bus, and vice versa.
Mind you, plugging an SCSI-1 device into the bus will limit it to single-ended narrow speeds, so you wouldn't ever want to mix it with new devices, but it will in fact work.
In fact the only external CD-ROM I had for years was an old 1x SCSI, and I've run on machines up to Ultra160.
Matt
Re:Risk of historical loss (Score:2)
TCFS (Score:3, Interesting)
Presumably Henry Spencer (or others at utzoo or elsewhere) could use something like this to bundle up tapes of somewhat more modern provenance...
Re:Risk of historical loss (Score:2)
Second, magnetic tape deteriorates with age. The base material gets brittle. The magnetic patterns slowly demagnetize, and also can "print through" to the next layer of tape.
Brittleness can be delayed by proper storage (controlled humidity and temperature) plus winding the tape onto a new spool every two or three years. These tapes were relatively low density, with big and heavily magnetized areas, so demagnetization and print through affect them more slowly than most formats. But I think that after 10 or 15 years, they are overdue to be copied to something else.
E-mag does have a "datalink" service doing that -- or, it can take data in more modern formats and mail it out on 9-track, if you've got customers that still need it. But it is _really_ time to replace the 9-track drives and copy the data to new media. Someday any format you pick will go obsolete too and make more business for e-mag's service... They seem to favor "3408" whatever that is (another tape format?), but I'd suggest using a very good CD-R if you don't want to go through this again too soon. You can be pretty sure that the data on a good CD-R will survive for longer than drives are made, and that will be a few decades. That is, many DVD drives are backwards compatible to read CD-R's, and when they replace DVD's, the best of the new drives will still be backwards compatible all the way to CD-R's. Note that drives that could read 5-1/4 360K floppy disks hit the market about 1981, 360K/1.2M drives were standard equipment for drive B in 1991, and I doubt they are entirely out of production even now. The 3-1/2 1.44M drives are going to exceed 15 years on the market. But those were never consumer products; CD's are, so replacing them will take much longer.
Well... (Score:1)
I keep hoping...
Memories (Score:3, Informative)
They don't make 'em as they used to anymore, son.
I've used them (Score:3, Informative)
I even remember older 7 track tapes, and going from 1600 bpi (bits per inch) to 6250 bpi. I may still have a copy of my Masters' thesis lying around on one (in a proprietary mark-up format: Formal (Hi AJWM!)). Fat lot of good it does.
Man.. What am I going to do with all those tapes? (Score:4, Funny)
takes me back (Score:2)
Re:takes me back (Score:3, Funny)
Heh. I have more L1 cache than my first machine had external storage.
Re:takes me back (Score:4, Funny)
Re:takes me back (Score:3, Funny)
Re:takes me back (Score:3, Funny)
Re:takes me back (Score:3, Funny)
Re:takes me back (Score:2)
Laugh not! (Score:2)
Still using them! (Score:3, Funny)
Perfect timing (Score:5, Funny)
*sigh*
Re:Perfect timing (Score:2)
Tron wasn't a fantasy then was it?
Re:Perfect timing (Score:2, Funny)
Hell, yeah. Screw the Segway, I want a goddamn Lightcycle! [mac.com] (200k)
You listening, Bezos?!
Converting old 9-track tapes to something better (Score:5, Informative)
On topic: I can recall using magnetic powder sprinkled on tapes to see where the block gaps were. Then you could use a ruler to measure the size of the blocks, and convert to byte (by multiplying by the density). This gave you a head start in getting the JCL DD statement right for the tape. FB/80/800!
Re:Converting old 9-track tapes to something bette (Score:2, Interesting)
We do a lot of work with state and federal governments and they still use them so we have to sometimes as well. In fact, we're working on a project right now with a state agency and the only common format they can provide us data on (that we can read) is 9-track. They have newer cartridges but we've already got the 9-track in use and don't see much point in buying a new drive to read the cartridges from their mainframes.
They've already told us that next year, however, we'll have to find a different way because they're finally retiring their 9-tracks.
I said, "Can't you just burn the data onto CD-Rs for us?"
Re:Converting old 9-track tapes to something bette (Score:2)
Cryptnotic
Re:Converting old 9-track tapes to something bette (Score:2)
More likely somebody got a tax cut by slashing the technology budget for the agency. I work for a small non-profit and we upgrade our hardware and software more often than some of the government agencies we work with.
Re:Converting old 9-track tapes to something bette (Score:2)
Re:Converting old 9-track tapes to something bette (Score:2)
The problem is, as you noted, that it is easy, and procedures exist, to dump data to tape. Extracting the data, moving it to another system, and reformatting it for PC file formats, is not so simple.
Re:Converting old 9-track tapes to something bette (Score:2)
If you could compile rzsz for this mainframe, you could use a serial console to send the files over to a PEECEE, as you call them.
It's easier than you think, ignorant one.
Cryptnotic
Re:Converting old 9-track tapes to something bette (Score:2)
Good riddance! (Score:1)
Funny thing is that the DAT decks were not more reliable than the old tape drives they replaced. Much faster and less annoying, sure, but no better in terms of reliability.
We still kept another tape drive, that one seemed to be at least 12" in diameter. It was hell to mount because both spools mounted on a bayonet mount coaxially!
2001 Metaphor (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:2001 Metaphor (Score:2)
I got to reels from an old tape player, and they move back and forth when the HD is hit. its still got glitches.
If I could only get it to shoot out sparks my system crashes...
Time to upgrade. (Score:4, Funny)
I remember... (Score:2, Funny)
Are they really gone? (Score:2, Interesting)
Hm, this story again.
Aren't these guys [imation.com] still making their own tapes?
Re:Are they really gone? (Score:1)
Floppies.... (Score:1)
Re:Floppies.... (Score:2)
Check this. 20x IDE CD-RW drives cost $80. Burning 10 megs worth of data on a rewritable disc takes approximately a minute and a half including index, probably a lot faster than putting the same data on 6 or 7 floppies. So taking a Powerpoint presentation home from work now takes 10 minutes to facilitate, instead of half an hour to break the presentation up on floppies, on a medium that has thus far proven to be more resilient than magnetic disk. I know of nobody at my place of employment who can fit documents they use at work (MS Office docs, etc.) on a single floppy disk. We all have backed up network storage that we access through a VPN connection anyways!
Besides the fact that 700 meg CD-Rs cost less than 1 meg floppy disks, and CD-RWs are not much more.
Next, the boot question. Boot CDs are now nearly as easy to master as boot floppies, and all PCs that I've seen since 1996 support CD boot.
Remind me again why we need floppy drives?
Re:Floppies.... (Score:2)
CompactFlash USB readers (though not yet easily bootable) are around $30, and a 128-meg card can be had for less than $50. Stick it in the little plastic container (less than a quarter the size of a 3.5" floppy disk), and throw it in your pocket.
Wait! (Score:2)
I hope you offloaded all the ASCII pr0n before trashing your tapes.
HAL... (Score:2)
We're really have made it to the future ... (Score:2)
Now's the time to invest in the christmas light and plasterboard companies
One-liners Rendered Obsolete (Score:5, Funny)
BTW Google's 20 year posts were on 9 track (Score:2)
Re:BTW Google's 20 year posts were on 9 track (Score:2)
Suddenly, no. But, it means it's now an officially dead media, and better hurry to get the data off that format.
It also means 9track drive manufacturers will be phasing out support of their hardware.
Just great.... (Score:2, Funny)
Noooo! Bring back the 9-track tapes! (Score:5, Funny)
I love 9-track tapes: it makes me feel like I'm a member of the old school when using them. Back in college, every other month, I'd stop by my University's mainframe center. They had a stack of retired 9-tracks there that said "Take One", and I'd help myself. I actually backed up some of my old mail onto one of them, using the CS department's old drive. But one day, my life changed. Someone told me that 9-track tapes are made with Kevlar: that's some tough-ass stuff, it is. My job was clear.
At the time, I was living on the 4th (top) floor of a U-shaped dorm, with about 100 feet between the "prongs". I lived at one edge, and as luck would have it, my best friend lived in the other prong. So, of course, we decided that we needed a tape wire running over the street from my window to his. 9-track should be perfect, right? After all, we did have about 6000 feet of it. And it's so strong and light. What could go wrong?
I gave my friend one reel, and I kept the other. 3AM on a Tuesday arrives. Our third accomplice, a friend of ours named Zaki, goes down to the street. My friend and I, in our windows, unreel enough tape that it reaches the ground, where Zaki grabs one end, hauls it over to the other end, and ties them together. My friend starts pulling up, and the tape began to rise ever so majectically over the street. It was a beautiful site.... until....
"What are you doing?" a cop's voice suddenly boomed, approaching Zaki, who was helplessly watching the tape rise above his head.
"Uh... just, uh.. running a little tape wire here, sir," he said, with surprising sincerity. The wire was now about at the level of the 3rd floor as my friend continued reeling it in.
"And what are you going to do when that falls, and hits someone in the head?" the cop inquired. Though not as politely as this text might suggest.
As if on cue, the tape became taut -- my friend had reeled in his side completely. It was at that moment that I realized that Zaki's tape attachment skills should not have been trusted. (After all, I'm the one who owns the Ashley Book of Knots [amazon.com] - it should have been my job.) Yes, that's right: the tape came apart. My friend's side was safely in his apartment. But my side? Oh no. It was fluttering down towards the street, right towards the heads of Cop and Zaki, who were intently discussing the merits of the project.
I turned from the window - in a complete panic - and began RUNNING, tape reel in hand, as fast as I could through the apartment! Through the living room, through the corridor, past the kitchen and another corrdidor - with the tape trailing behind me. Finally, I reached my bedroom, and with no where left to run I started spinning in circles as fast as I could, wrapping the tape around me. When I finally fell onto by bed, dizzy, I could only hope that enough tape had been taken in through the window to avoid A Scene.
Luckily, it was. Like I said, that tape is strong.
So let this be a lesson to those of you still in college: use the back windows that face the alley, instead.
Re:Noooo! Bring back the 9-track tapes! (Score:2)
Re:Noooo! Bring back the 9-track tapes! (Score:2)
Re:Noooo! Bring back the 9-track tapes! (Score:2)
What will the IRS and FAA do ?? (Score:4, Funny)
YAY! (Score:2)
Uh-oh.... (Score:3, Funny)
Memories! Misty.... (Score:3, Interesting)
At my first real employer in technology, we were nice and up to date... 4mm DAT for all our backups.
Except... we interfaced with some companies in the healthcare industry. All of their data came in on 9-Track.
Everyone else had a great deal of difficulty making the tape drive read some of the various formats and work out the bpi and character formats on our flukey old 9-track drive... except me. I was the 9-Track Wizard. Give me the tape and I could get the data off. Reel bent in the mail? No problem. Cut tapes? Bring it on...
I even got the responsibility for blanking out the tapes. I had to write a nice little program to write prime numbers to the tapes in order to have some nice random data.
Ah, those were the days, years ago. All gone now.
I'll miss you, little 9-track.
*sniff*
In other media retirement news.. (Score:2)
5.25" Disks (Score:3, Interesting)
Imation and Maxell, at least, are still producing them.
http://www.intimecatalog.com/supplies/DISKETTES
Any guesses when those will stop being produced?
Re:What about 8" disks (Score:2)
http://www.intimecatalog.com/disk.phtml and click on almost any of the manufacturers.
Lots of companies still use them (Score:2)
in other news.. (Score:2)
Fun to unload off the fantail of the carrier (Score:5, Interesting)
Other way was slide it down a swab handle, spin off enough tape to reach the water, and sooner or later the water would get a good hold of it and start unwinding it. You held the swab handle with both hands, being damned sure to keep the spinning reel centered, because it would give you a good burn it was spinning so fast. Eventually all the tape was in the water, at which time you flipped the swab handle up and away so the empty reel spun off like a frisbee, much faster than any mere hand spin could do.
Yeh, probably not a reel (sic) environmentally friendly way to dump them, but it gave the Soviet trawlers something to watch.
Re:Fun to unload off the fantail of the carrier (Score:3, Funny)
Nine-Track Story (also 'Stupid Operator Story') (Score:5, Interesting)
Suddenly we started having a problem with one particular set of accounts, the amounts being posted were coming out wrong by a significant margin. But the problem made no sense because no other accounts were affected and I couldn't find a bug in the code that would do this. After several months of this (and my boss coming down on my neck) I decided to go down to the computer center and watch the process run in person.
I know. I know. Going to the watch a program run should make no difference at all. But I was getting desparate!
So I am sitting in a room half the size of a football field, full of hulking mainframe equipment, watching while the operators fetch and load the nine-track tapes containing the accounting history for that year. About fifteen minutes into the process one of the tape drives started 'hiccuping'. It would advance, backup, advance, backup over and over. Then one of the operators went up to it, stopped it, opened the glass cover, advanced the tape by hand, closed the cover and restarted it.
I nearly fell out of my shoes. I then asked what the hell he thought he was doing? "Oh, we have problems with that tape all the time, so we just turn it past the problem!"
Turns out the tape had a bad spot. If the operator had left it alone it would have timed out and we would have gotten a console error. Instead the operator would hand-turn it past the bad spot and the way the tape blocks were written to tape allowed it to actually continue from that point.
So I created a new tape from the backup; problem solved and my boss was happy with me. No the operator wasn't fired, but they did do some 're-training'. The accountants were still pissed anyway, but they always seemed to have a bug up their butts.
Me, I felt like a gawdamn Sherlock Holmes...
Jack William Bell, who did his time in the COBOL mines and is *never* going back...
More stupid operator stories. (Score:2)
9-track write-enable tabs (Score:4, Interesting)
It's a Christmas (er, I mean Unnamed Holiday) tradition in our family to "play rings". Basically, about 25 years ago, my Dad managed to get hold of a big box of plastic write-enable rings. So, we put a target (like a beer bottle, or a toilet plunger, or anything else that is skinny and stands up) in the middle of the room and throw rings at it. There are enough rings for everyone to have a good 50-60 of them.
Of course, what invariably happens is that someone ends up accidentally hitting someone else, sparking a huge ring fight with everyone trying to bean everyone else. The room always ends up covered in rings, and when anyone runs out of rings, they have to go gather up used ones from the floor, which always leads to them getting pelted with more of the things as other family members see an easy target.
It'll be sad to see these stop being produced, even if my only involvment with them had absolutely nothing to do with "the good old days of computing".
Re:9-track write-enable tabs (Score:2)
I think I smell a career move for Callista Flockhart.
--saint
My very first job in the IT field... (Score:5, Interesting)
Once the reels soaked long enough, I would take a razor and start scraping the labels, also subjecting my hands to more EOC(tm) and possible razor cuts. Then I would have to clean the EOC(tm) off the tapes, which incidentally, the EOC(tm) can remove almost anything, but you can't remove the EOC(tm). then I would put the tapes into a machine that would basically do the equivalent of a low-level format and check for bad tracks/sectors.
If a tape had fewer than x number of bad sectors, then it would be fit for resale. My boss would sell these tapes back to the same companies we bought them from for a few dollars less than they paid for them.
Of course, this all came to an end when (a) people started switching to other backup media and (b) hard drives started getting cheaper.
Needless to say, I was happy when we stopped refurbing the tapes. Hooray for their demise!!!!!
Something fun to do with 9-track tape (Score:4, Funny)
That being said, if we're going to rid ourselves of 9-track for good, there's plenty of excellent fun to be had with it.
One of the best uses for it is to use it to prevent someone from getting into something. To wit: get a friend to help you wrap the contents of a couple of reels around someone's car. Just pass the reel back and forth underneath the car and gradually work it backwards from about where the side mirrors are located. About 3 1000' reels is enough to completely cover the doors. Do it TIGHTLY, almost to the point where the tape breaks. Once you've got a good seal (you'll know you do when you release the ends of the tape and it doesn't move at all), you're done. Damn near impossible to remove easily, and even though the door handles will be accessible, it will take the friggin' Jaws of Life to open the doors. That tape is stronger than it looks.
Another use for it is Christmas decoration. Pack away a couple of reels and use it like tinsel on your tree next year. Don't use it sparingly -- drape it on. It makes a lovely silvery-black tree.
A friend of mine and I used to take a few reels up to the top of a very large hill and "race the reels." You've got to have a really LONG runour on the hill for this. All you have to do for this one is drop the reel on the ground, stand it upright, and pull as hard as you can on the loose tape end. Once the reel starts rolling down the hill, keep pulling steadily but back off a bit in speed. You'll find that the reel will speed up quite a bit as it unspools. In fact, they can get _deadly_ fast! Doing this trick with metal reels once caused one of them to imbed itself about an inch in a cinderblock wall at the end of the hill.
Just my contribution to the end-of-life celebrations.
God still owns a 9-track drive (Score:2, Funny)
800/1600/6250 bpi 9-track
DC-300A tape cartridge
1.44 3.5" floppy
5.25" DS/DD floppy
HP format 2gb DAT
8mm Exabyte tape
100mb Zip
and now I'd probably add
600mb CDR
20gb/40gb DLT
This becomes important because we were forever being asked which media we supported for interchange (people would send us 100mb things). "Oh, we have the ability to read all of the stuff god sends us..."
-- Multics
P.S. Oh, yeah god has retired only three media formats so far: 80-column punched cards, 8" SS SD floppy disks and of course paper tape (via his/her recently retired ASR-33 TTY)
P.S.S. I'll be keeping my 9-track drive around until it dies. Never know when another 9-track tape needs to be dusted off and despooled. The final era of tape drives are painless, rackmountable, reliable, self-loading, and play well with others on a SCSI-2 bus.
See also (Score:3, Interesting)
Alas poor TU16, I knew you well (Score:2)
Nostalgia Trip (Score:2)
Yeah, my introduction to Unix was 4.2 BSD running on a Celerity 1260. We had a 9-track drive hooked up to it so that we could not only archive files at the incredible density of 1600 bpi, but also to transfer files from machines that did not have good IP connections back in 1985.
When I moved locations, I brought my user directories with me, all 40 MB of them, on a reel of 9 track tape. Now, with disks as cheap as they are, I keep the compressed tar files as but a small portion of my multi-GB user directory and have scrapped the reel of tape.
At the time, I felt the 9 track tapes were more reliable and portable than the new fangled 1/4-inch QIC drives that, for example, I had on a Sun 3/160.
What's an acceptable replacement? (Score:4, Informative)
9-track tapes are designed for long-term storage. You put your data on one of those, and if you follow the proper procedures for storing it and retensioning the tape every few years and so on, you can be pretty sure that the data will still be readable 30 years later. Even more important than long storage lifetime with appropriate maintenance is that the storage lifetime and required maintenance to achieve long lifetime are know and well-defined. That's a critical feature in some applications - important enough to make it worth dealing with the other less pleasant aspects of 9-track technology.
On one of my co-op terms I copied a bunch of remote sensing data from 9-track to 8mm cartridges. I sure hope they kept the 9-track originals, because those will still be readable today. The 8mm tapes aren't - the stored data degrades after 5 to 10 years under the (admittedly non-optimal) conditions where we were using the tapes. CD-R is supposed to last for decades, but we don't know that it really does yet; there may be problems yet to be discovered with dyes fading, drives spinning discs too fast so that they break (52x CD-ROM drives have been observed to do that), or drives becoming unavailable because they've all been replaced with "secure" audio media For The Artists' Protection.
That scientific data will still be valuable to researchers for at least a hundred years. My ex-employers can re-copy it if necessary, but they don't have the budget to do that very often, and they want to be very sure that they know exactly how often it has to be re-copied to maintain a specified level of reliability. Properly used 9-track archive tapes are acceptable in that application. I don't know of any other medium that is. So within a very limited field, 9-track appears to me to be state of the art today.
I hope there's some acceptable replacement available today, or that there will be before the stocks of blank tapes run out.
[OT] Re:What's an acceptable replacement? (Score:2)
LOKI DESCENT3 DISC#1
literally shrapnel-ize itself in my 52x drive, taking the drive out with it. Makes a hell of a bang too, especially when you're sitting there in the dark at 11pm. This was a 'manufactured' not burned disc.
"Prepare for Descent......." **BLAM***tinkletinkle
Crawl out from under desk. "WTF?"
Soylent Green (Score:3, Funny)
At least, that's how we used to do it. Ah, those were the days... hang on, someone's at the dooaaRRGH NO DON'T TURN ME INTO FOOD AGUUYTQOVU5q6ew765127 kqe =-;el2qr3k
More fun with 9 Track tape (CDC drives) (Score:2, Interesting)
Each drive had two reels and two columns to maintain slack when the the tape reels reversed or stopped. When a column loaded you got a loud, satisfying PHONKKK as the vacuum pulled the loop of tape to the bottom of the column.
Each drive had two manual feed buttons to spin the tape in one direction, or the other.
And no interlock.
So all you had to do was load a tape (it was traditional to find a fellow graduate student with thesis data on tape, and do a quick swap with a scratch tape).
Load the tape.
Then press both buttons at once, listen to the PHONKS, watch the reels spin madly, stretching the tape to a tiny thread until it broke, provoking another round of PHONKS.
and listen for the scream.
I believe CDC added an interlock
UNIVAC tape (Score:3, Interesting)
If there was a drive left anywhere that could read it, it would probably read OK, 35 years after it was written.
Not so fast (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:It's about time (Score:1)
Re:It's about time (Score:2)
Re:Other retired media? (Score:3, Informative)
Personally, I will sorta miss that "thwupp!" sound when the tape drive grabbed the tape to feed it onto the take-up reel. (Okay, not really, but I wanted to somehow work in the fact that I had used 9-track.)
Re:Other retired media? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:9 track tapes are hardly dead (Score:2, Informative)