Review: Nex II CF MP3 Player 227
In digital photography, I've pretty much stuck with the CF-based Nikon Coolpix series of digital cameras, so I had scads of CF memory cards lying about. I also have an IBM Microdrive which I use when taking TIFFs using the Nikon. So I wanted an MP3 player able to handle not just Compact Flash, but also the Microdrive. The Microdrive is tricky because it both consumes much more power than solid-state CF cards, but also is slower to respond and larger, demanding the taller CF-II slot.
Until the i2go ego, there wasn't a mp3 player that could handle the Microdrive. I had owned and immediately given away the original, incredibly flawed, RCA Lyra because it simply stank so much I couldn't stand to own the thing. If RCA wants to send one of the new ones, I'd be pleased to check it out, but the shoddy original made me vow never to give RCA more MP3 player money.
The i2go ego (still sold some places, although I think the company that made it is defunct, look look here to see one) wasn't all bad. It played, and it acted as a pretty basic voice recorder, and it allowed for two CF cards to be inserted, at least if you bought a funny daughter board. But its build quality was such that it would spontaneously lose power if jostled. Also, it had the most annoying bug ever: the player would remember the card's contents from before, even if you changed said card's contents. It would try to play them too. It also -- at random --wouldn't notice songs that were on the card. It was very annoying, besides which it was enormous for an MP3 player.
I had been checking out the Nex II for a few months and with a long trip coming up, I decided I needed a MP3 player for the trip. I wanted to have a player that was smartly designed and able to run the microdrive. The Nex II seemed to fit the bill, so I ordered one (with a 256mb card included) for $239 (plus $15 shipping).
It arrived promptly 3 days after order from Frontier Labs' shop in Hong Kong; I've been using it for about a week now, and I have to say it's the best player I've ever owned. The display, an LCD (the letters are not blurry on the actual display) with a blue electro-luminescent backlight, is very readable, and the interface is super easy to use, with a rocker button on the right for track control above the volume buttons and the stop and the "fn" button on the left, under the headphone jack.
Conveniently, the Nex II also acts as a plain vanilla USB drive, so I can upload and download songs (or other files) under Linux with no problem. You can chose from two types of display while the song is playing (status or spectrographic display), which is fun. I stick with the status screen, which shows all pertinent information, including track length, quality in kbps, song title and time elapsed. The player has been able to handle any data rate I've thrown at it, and the specs says it can play WMA files, but I can't verify that. Also, I was able to pass the card to the camera and back with no problem, as neither the nikon nor the player are too controlling of the disk format.
Physically about the size of thick deck of playing cards, the Nex II allows you to change the color of the area around the LCD by sliding in thin colored pieces of glossy paper. You can buy more of these skins for $10, including the unfortunately named "mutant sperm" skin. It also comes with a snappy little neoprene case which has transparent portions covering the LCD and buttons so you can see what's up.
Despite all its good points, the Nex isn't perfect, it lacks some basic features, namely any sort of external power connector. You must always run it with 2 AA batteries. Mind you, it lasts 12 hours when using solid state CF and 5 when using a microdrive, so this is less inconvenient than it sounds. Also, the included headphones are not to my taste at all. The battery cover should be redesigned completely so the latches aren't as flimsy -- every time I change the batteries, I picture scotch tape in my future. Many would probably also like to see it be able to play Ogg Vorbis files, but that wasn't a deal breaker for me.
Another quirk of the Nex II is that to play Microdrives well, you need to load the 1.4(m) firmware available from the FrontierLabs website. It's odd that they didn't make this the default firmware, as the 1.4m firmware seems to work equally well with solid state cards and microdrives, while the firmware it ships with works poorly with microdrives.
So if you're looking for a decent mp3 player, you should check it out. The Nex II is an excellent value, and it sounds terrific.
Predictions (Score:5, Funny)
10 posts about how it doesn't play Ogg
14 posts about how Ogg sounds much better than MP3 or WMA.
4 posts flaming people for not reading the article
15 posts about how much better the iPod is
20 posts about how the next Nomad will be better than the iPod
12 posts about the copy protection in the
17 posts about how some
5 posts about how Kazaa isn't truly P2P
4 posts about how no other player other than the iPod uses FireWire
3 posts from some guy about how USB is fine and nobody needs FireWire
5 posts claiming that it would take "days" to transfer an x gigabyte MP3 collection.
6 replies about how the new FireWire Nomad is coming RealSoonNow.
3 posts predicting the messages in this thread
9 posts about how thread prediction posts suck
Re:Predictions (Score:2)
Re:you forgot... (Score:2)
Not for long. -1 posts don't get archived.
Features (Score:1, Interesting)
I still think the Nomad II MG can not be beat for anyone who wants a small MP3 player, the ability to listen to radio, record radio, and record voice.
Tip of the day:
Ever had a problem with carrying change, keys, ID, or MP3 player while running, biking, or working out? Especially for an MP3 player without a belt clip? Click here, and then thank me.
Amphipod [amphipod.com]
Nomad II MG has no memory! (Score:1)
Why are they so idiotic? Why can't they supply a reasonable amount of memory? We're already in 2002, aren't we? So why do manufactorers expect us to settle with 64 megs?
There are Nomads with more memory, but they don't have an FM radio.
I'll tell you what I'm looking for:
That's it. Now, is there anything that does that? Couldn't find anything like that, yet.. the RioVolt 250 gets close to it, but it doesn't resume play.
- Bronze
Re:Nomad II MG has no memory! (Score:1)
Re:Features (Score:2)
Re:Features (Score:2)
Chief, don't sell yourself short. 60 minutes sounds like a REALLY long time to be away from the computer to me. How do you do it??
Re:Features (Score:2)
May be -- the problem i've always had with the waist things is that the bouncing either drives me nuts or pulls my running shorts down
So I started using the armband radios, but would love to take my own music instead -- i'm curious, what about this design makes it not bounce/pull down? It seems like using a clip on shorts would have the same jarring gravity effect with every step that is like tugging on the shorts?
But wait, there's more.. (Score:5, Informative)
- graphic equalizer (handy for tuning for headphones with no bass)
- spectrum display (as an alternative to the normal track display)
- CF is the best value per megabyte of any storage
On the negative side, the slot for the CF card is too deep and you can miss the pins if not careful.
Re:But wait, there's more.. (Score:1)
1.: From the review:
You can chose from two types of display while the song is playing (status or spectrographic display)
2.: CF costs way more per megabyte than HDs or CDs. Its advantages are size, robustness and weight.
Re:But wait, there's more.. (Score:1)
Re:But wait, there's more.. (Score:2)
Re:But wait, there's more.. (Score:2, Informative)
It's really simple: it doesn't. He was talking about an MP3 CD player, which does have moving parts (it has a data CD, which stores MP3 files, which is being spun round at a constant velocity, be it angular or linear), which therefore skips with read errors when that velocity changes due to the unit being jostled. The unit that is being reviewed here doesn't have moving parts, and doesn't skip.
I wonder who modded your message to 2?! No offense intended.
thenerd.
I agree - it is the best, non mac based. (Score:5, Informative)
The iPod could be better, but I also dont see the point of carrying around 65 million mp3's I am quite happy with my 2 256Merg CF cards. and many times I never listen to 1/2 the music I am carrying... but then that is just me others might like the fact that they can sit through 3 meetings, 2 lunches, 4 bitching-out's by the boss, and 2 more meetings before hearing the same song again....
Now if they would make an MP3 boom-box... that way I can annoy those around me.
Archos (Score:3, Informative)
It uses USB, so it's not super fast, but it's fast enough for all my uses.
Re:Archos (Score:2)
Once (Score:2)
I can happily leave my USB drive working for an hour while I wander off and chat, watch tv, whatever.
After that, I rarely transfer more than 3-4 albums at a time, which isn't more than a couple of minutes.
Re:Archos (Score:2)
Huh? To load 100 hours of music? Heck, I'd gladly wait 10 hours to load 100 hours of music. I'd hook it up in the evening, drag my whole /MP3 directory tree (from the linux server running samba) onto the archos and let it sit all night long while I slept. I can't imagine doing this more than once every few months, at MOST. And with the 20GB drive (over 300 hours of music), I doubt I'd ever do it more than once. Sure, I'd hook it up to copy over new albums as I rip them, but that would only take, what, a few minutes at most?
Numbers can be lots of fun, but in the real world, they don't mean a whole lot by themselves.
It occurs to me that I've probably spent several man-months in music stores selecting and purchasing CD's. What's another 67 minutes to put all that music in the palm of my hand?
MP3 boom box (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I agree - it is the best, non mac based. (Score:2, Informative)
Too bad it's only sold in Japan. Then again, that just makes it easier to brag with mine...
Re:I agree - it is the best, non mac based. (Score:3, Informative)
Apart from this other CF-based one [mydigitaldiscount.com], you mean? It's not as featureful as the Nex-II, but it's cheaper too. I have one, and it's OK. I prefer the sound of my MD walkman, but that wasn't $75.
The other downside of the iPod is the hard disk, which is (relatively speaking) a fragile medium. The CF-based players are completely solid-state.
Re:I agree - it is the best, non mac based. (Score:2)
Those little drives can take a lot of abuse, look at what notebook drives go through, or the IBM microdrives. Read this month's American Photographer to see how much abuse one of those can take, or just look at the camera on the front cover and realize the microdrive lived through it.
Er, except for the microdrives they just talked about in the review. Not that you need to use them, not when 256M CF cards are under $100.
Microboss MP3 Pocket (Score:1)
... apart from those mentioned by others in this thread. To which I would like to add the "Microboss MP3 Pocket" player that I own. It's a tiny little box that takes ordinary CF cards (no microdrives, alas) onto which you can store ordinary MP3s. And at approx. $50, it's only half the price of the device from the above review.
For those who are interested (and can read German), I wrote a little review [haun-online.de] about the Microboss player.
bye, Dirk
Re:Microboss MP3 Pocket (Score:1)
It's sold by a company in Germany [microboss.de]. But since it has a "made in China" sticker on the back I wouldn't be too surprised if it was available under a different name from another company.
bye, Dirk
Re:I agree - it is the best, non mac based. (Score:3, Insightful)
The point is that you can have a big pile of your music (maybe "all" of it) on the thing, and you don't have to think about what you want to listen to this morning before you go running. Plus if you change your mind about being in a Jazz mood and decide Techno or the Blues is right for you half way through your run it is more likely to be in a 5G collection then a 256M collection.
That may not be with twice the price (or maybe just an extra $100 depending on how much CF you buy vs. how much you had sitting around from digital cameras) to everyone, but it is to some folks. (I'll leave out the FireWire, since you can load a CF card mighty fast with a PCMCIA sled, or a $100 FireWire adaptor; and the battery life may be better on an iPod, but getting two AA's is frequently simpler then finding some place with a FireWire plug to top off...)
Re:I agree - it is the best, non mac based. (Score:2)
I know, I own one
Ever thought you topped off a battery and found out later that you didn't? Ever look at the 2 of 4 bars on the iPod and thought that would get you an hour of use? Ever get insominia and spend 8 hours trying to walk it off to have the iPod give up? Ever delay a much needed job just to give the iPod a little juice (that's a small complaint -- unless you are my dog, then it's a rather major one)
That's all happened to me. That doesn't make the iPod crap, I really do like it, it is a modest argument for AA batteries in devices where that matches the power needs.
Better yet would be AA NiMH's with a built in charger. In a pinch you can use normal AA's, for normal use you can just plug it in whenver you get a chance. Totally better. Unless you forget you put Ak AA's in and try to charge, and end up with fire or leaking acid or whatever Ak AA's do when you try to charge them up. That part would suck a lot.
Yahoo Group (Score:5, Informative)
What's the point of MP3 players? (Score:1, Troll)
Yes, we have LOTS of older stuff that we can convert to MP3, but it sounds like all lawful means of converting to MP3 format are being taken from us.
So, is the message, "If you have unlawfully obtained MP3's that you want to play, we provide a nice player for you!"? Or at some point is the music industry going to embrace MP3 format (cough, cough).
Re:What's the point of MP3 players? (Score:1)
Ok, all that being said, I do think that we are going to move to a digital model for music. DataPlay was talking about having mutiple compressed albums on one of their disk-thingies. A lot of the major labels have some form of download based music in the works, even if it is the pay-napster thing that was previewed a couple weeks ago. I think these are the next generation of the portable CD players. They're smaller, almost as good quality(which means good enough for 97.658% of the people out there).
Re:What's the point of MP3 players? (Score:1)
>to put CD tracks directly into MP3 format.
What makes you say that? AFAIK, no one can make the format illegal/expensive to use, the only area of influence is in the codecs. So we may not have integrated-with-OS apps for ripping mp3, but we will still have open source alternatives [sourcefourge.net] for encoding.
am I missing something?
Royalties for MP3 encoders (Score:1)
AFAIK, no one can make the format ... expensive to use
Not even Thomson [mp3licensing.com]?
but we will still have open source alternatives (such as LAME) for encoding.
Which are illegal to use in the United States and other countries where the algorithms necessary to encode MP3 are patented. Fraunhofer's patents cover more than just its codec and ISO's codec.
Re:What's the point of MP3 players? (Score:2)
Not gonna happen, ever.
Bit-perfect "ripping" may possibly become impossible, though I think even that is unlikely. But there simply isn't a way that they can prevent sampling the line out from a music player and converting to MP3. You lose some quality there, but very little. Probably less than the MP3 compression itself causes.
Perfect rips are a nice luxury, but it's definitely not a requirement that will kill MP3 (or Ogg) if we can't do it.
Re:What's the point of MP3 players? (Score:1)
Sound ? (Score:1)
Is there anyone that has heard one of these that can give more of a description than
"and it sounds terrific.".
This review is like: "yep, found this really cool gadget, it works with Linux and....what ? you mean it plays MP3s ? Cool!"
or am I the only one that thought that ?
Re:Sound ? (Score:2)
think portable, and then think portable quality.
Re:Sound ? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Sound ? (Score:3, Informative)
if you want to buy one cheaper... (Score:4, Informative)
has them for cheaper and super low shipping. That's where I got mine, and I see today that they are selling it for even less than before.... my luck I bought mine a month ago.
Re:if you want to buy one cheaper... (Score:2)
-- iCEBaLM
Ogg vorbis (Score:1)
Current Ogg uses floating-point (Score:4, Informative)
If I were a portable music device manufacturer, I would seriously look at this format as a possible option in future products.
However, the current Vorbis reference decoder uses floating-point math, which isn't available on cheap DSPs. As of yet, there isn't (to my knowledge) a fixed-point decoder for any Ogg format. This is the biggest thing holding up Ogg support on portable audio players.
Re:Current Ogg uses floating-point (Score:4, Informative)
Price (Score:5, Informative)
-OctaneZ
Re:Price (Score:3, Informative)
An mp3 player of this quality for $79?? Sign me up--and send me your old CF cards.
I agree (Score:2)
Re:I agree (Score:2)
-Adam
No Remote Control (Score:1)
Although some people might find this to be a minor flaw, I would have liked to have seen it have a Remote Control that sits between the player and the headphones. As I like to put my player (minidisc/mp3) in my jacket/backpack, it can be a royal pain having to fumble around for the player, just to change tracks. Or for example using a tape converter in car to listen to your mp3s, can become quite dangerous if you have to muck about with the player to change tracks.
I may be wrong, and perhaps there is a remote control for this product, but from looking at the pictures I could not see one...
Re:No Remote Control (Score:1)
CF is OK, but SD won. (Score:1)
The fact is that all Palm devices and the new 3800 iPaqs have built-in connector for the SD card standard. I think the PDA market will pump the SD card standard to the top of the market. My next MP3 player (well okay my first mp3 player
When are we going to see car stereo decks that take some sort of memory card? That could obsolete CDs for good.
Re:CF is OK, but SD won. (Score:2)
Re:CF is OK, but SD won. (Score:1)
Re:CF is OK, but SD won. (Score:2)
The digital camera market seems to sell a lot more memory cards then the PDA market (I know of some PDA users with no external memory, and many with but one card...the digital camera owners seem to have at a bare minimum the card that came with the camera plus one other, many have 4 or 5 extra cards). SM/SD seems mostly dead in the digital camera market, the only recent cameras with it are things like the E20 that also have CF slots, I assume because Oly use to be on the SmartMedia bandwagon and doesn't want to piss off it's past buyers.
The competition seems to be Sony and the MemoryStick vs. everyone else and Compact Flash. I wouldn't count Sony out as they sell lots of cameras, but Nikon plus Canon plus Oly plus Kodak plus...
I would bet on CF, in fact I guess having two cameras that use it and 4 CF cards (plus the microdrive when Canon ships it as part of my rebate), I guess I have. :-)
All sold out. (Score:2)
Nice review, Chris.
The only problem is that every one of their players is sold out.
They sell them via a Yahoo storefront [yahoo.com], and if you click on any of the players you'll see the following text:
Darn. And that $109 one with no memory looked like a deal!
Re:All sold out. (Score:2)
Besides, I checked already...
Other Nex II reviews... (Score:3, Informative)
Favorable at MP3.Com [mp3.com]
Negative at CNET.COM [cnet.com]
Brief at IGN FOR MEN (heh) [ign.com]
Mixed at Epinions [epinions.com]
This is for all of you who don't have google-equipped browsers.
Where are the portable MP3 recorders? (Score:2)
They'd be ideal for news people, taping live shows, and so on.
As cool as the iPod is, why can't it record?
Why the portable MP3 players can't record (Score:2)
As cool as the iPod is, why can't it record?
Re:Why the portable MP3 players can't record (Score:2)
Re:Why the portable MP3 players can't record (Score:2)
true. but the MP3 processing chip in the iPod is capable of real-time encoding.
the iPod has a mysterious connector around the headphone jack... it has three extra contacts. perhaps they were thinking of including this feature and decided against it at the last moment.
Probably not... (Score:2)
Mass-storage portable players are the future (Score:2)
I just bought an iPod [apple.com], and I think Apple were so close in creating the ultimate portable player. Of course, it only works if you own a Macintosh (despite the fact that I'm using it with Windows [mentaljewelry.org], most non-geek Windows users wouldn't buy it if it didn't work with Windows out of the box...), but why can't we buy any iPod-type deviced that doesn't need a computer?
I showed my mother my iPod, and she said that she would love to have one, if only she could copy her CDs onto it without having to have a computer inbetween. IMHO, an iPod-type device which lets you dump CDs straight onto it would sell like hot-cakes. I find that being able to listen to pretty much any music I want to, anywhere and any time I like has changed the way I listen to music, and so much for the better.
Fiddling around with silly memory cards is annoying to me, and confusing for Joe Average. I just want a box with music in it. I'll keep my iPod thanks. :)
You should try MiniDisc (Score:2)
but why can't we buy any iPod-type deviced that doesn't need a computer?
Have you ever looked at MiniDisc recorders? Each 6cm disc can hold five hours of audio in long-play mode, and it doesn't skip when bumped. If that isn't enough for jogging, what is?
Re:You should try MiniDisc (Score:2)
6 hours is not mass storage. My iPod can hold a significant portion of my music collection, and that's what makes it so great. MDs suffer from the "many disks" problem again.
Re:So stick more than one disc in your pocket (Score:2)
Yes dammit, that's exactly what I expect. Storage is CHEAP, and is the 21st century after all.
Where's my flying car anyway?
Re:Mass-storage portable players are the future (Score:2)
Re:Mass-storage portable players are the future (Score:2)
A question (Score:3, Interesting)
So, what I wan't to know is: Do these, and MP3 players in general, have any moving parts, and are they very resistance to shock, vibration and continuous movement?
Re:A question (Score:1)
Re:A question (Score:1)
Re:A question (Score:2)
Most MP3 players have no moving parts at all and are thus very shock-resistant by their very nature. Many of these use some internal memory, and some can use external flash cards to add to that memory.
Some MP3 players can use the IBM MicroDrive [ibm.com], which is a very small hard drive in a card form, in place of a flash card. The MicroDrive has moving parts and probably will have some problems with tons of movement and shock.
Other players, like Apple's iPod [apple.com], use a small hard drive contained within them. These have varying levels of shock protection, although all of them are shock protected to some degree. In the case of the iPod it has a 20 minute skip buffer which means it only needs to access the hard drive once every 20 minutes, the rest of the time the drive's head is parked and it is shockproof. These drives are also built for laptop use and are more rugged to start with.
So for the best shock protection I would go for a MP3 player with some sort of flash card. These usually only hold about a CD's worth of songs but that is still a good amount. The MicroDrives and the hard drive players hold a lot more songs and are still fairly shock resistant. I don't know how good they would last under a sustained pounding however.
Re:A question (Score:2)
Any MP3 player that does NOT use a hard drive or CDROM drive should have NO moving parts, and be completely resistent to shock, vibration, and continuous movement.
So long as that 'shock' you speak of does not include throwing the device on the ground. (They aren't indestructible.)
For the gadget impared. (Score:1)
Wanna send that to me?
-B2
RCA already has your MP3 player money (Score:3, Informative)
I had owned and immediately given away the original, incredibly flawed, RCA Lyra because it simply stank so much I couldn't stand to own the thing. If RCA wants to send one of the new ones, I'd be pleased to check it out, but the shoddy original made me vow never to give RCA more MP3 player money.
RCA already has your MP3 player money, and there's little you can do about it. RCA's parent Thomson Multimedia administers the patent rights for MP3 technology [mp3licensing.com] and charges royalties to all manufacturers of hardware MP3 players.
Belt clip, belt clip, belt clip... (Score:1)
Re:Belt clip, belt clip, belt clip... (Score:1)
Keeps Dying. (Score:5, Informative)
Some other negatives are:
- Plan to purchase "real" headphones as well. I have no idea what those "things" are that came with it.
- Audible "processor noise". That's about the only way I can describe it. The decoding is done by Software so when I first got my unit there was actual decoding "blips" but they fixed that in the 1.4 firmware... still not happy with the audio quality.
- damn thing doesn't remember last track played.
Pros are as mentioned earlier.
- Great battery life.
- FAT formatted CF Card and Microdrive. (I use an external USB CF reader to put stuff onto the card.
- Nice clear display.
- price
- support.
I recommend this unit for no other reason then to send a clear "up yours and your DRM" to the RIAA.
Here's a cheap shot (Score:2)
What do you expect, dude? It's
MADE IN HONG KONG
Superb until I tried to upgrade the firmware... (Score:2, Interesting)
CF vs SM? (Score:1)
Re:CF vs SM? (Score:3, Funny)
What bullshit (Score:3, Interesting)
Network Nex II (Score:1)
Think of it as a wireless AudioTron [audiotron.net]. (Nearly) Infinite storage capacity with good mobility. I'd buy one.
Reviewer, Bread, Butter... (Score:2)
I had owned and immediately given away the original, incredibly flawed, RCA Lyra because it simply stank so much I couldn't stand to own the thing. If RCA wants to send one of the new ones, I'd be pleased to check it out, but the shoddy original made me vow never to give RCA more MP3 player money.
It's one thing to state the problems, or even your dislike for a product, but why would RCA decide to ship a unit to a "journalist" (heh) who claims such bias as to pre-judge all future products because of one old first-generation product.
A reviewer's bread is buttered with free toys to review. Don't pander to the company, but don't snub them with prejudice either.
You Paid _HOW_ Much? (Score:3, Informative)
It's half the size of a deck of cards, it runs for about ten hours on one AA battery, and it acts as a USB removeable drive just like your $239 unit.
The only difference is the price. I got mine here for $70 plus $5 shipping.
Add a 256mb flash card from Pricewatch [pricewatch.com] for $80 and that brings the total to a measly $150 for a 256 MB mp3 player with zero copy protection, tiny size, and great sound.
Another kind of flashdrive MP3 player is the MelloMP3 unit. It's a little bigger and uses 2xAA batteries, but i got one for $60 for my brother for christmas.
Possibly the most interesting thing here is the compatibility of CompactFlash and IDE. If you do the wiring right you can stick a CF card straight onto an IDE cable with no other translation and it will work. So my idea for everyone, stick a hard drive under the seat of your car with a small power supply, then just hook the MP3 player to the car stereo via a Line In jack, and presto, you have a 30GB Car MP3 player for less than $200, plus you can take it with you.
Anyways, I hope someone finds this useful.
Muerte
Re:You Paid _HOW_ Much? (Score:2, Informative)
(with 32megs built-in) this is a hell of a deal.
Re:You Paid _HOW_ Much? (Score:2)
You can get a NEX II without memory for $90, so there's not as much price difference.
And the big feature difference is that the NEX can take microdrives.
intersting idea about the compactflash>IDE setup. That could be an interesting project!...
Battery life was terrible... (Score:2, Informative)
The interface is good, the size is downright tiny, but the battery life is miserable. Perhaps the reviewer was using the 1GB microdrive, which actually has a lower RPM than the 340MB (which is what I'm using) and consequently gets a better battery life, but my NexII would last a max of 3 hours on 2 batteries.
Not only that, but when the battery starts to get low, the nex II experienced lockups and crashes. It was an extremely frustrating experience. All of this only applied to the microdrive - with a CF card, it worked great. But the whole reason I purchased it was for its microdrive support. I did everything their manuals and website suggested, but it didn't really help.
Oh, and another annoying thing - the "shuffle" feature will always sort the songs in the same order.
Just my
Matt
advertising claims (Score:3, Interesting)
erm... hasn't the archos jukebox been able to do this for quite awhile now? i bought the 20GB version and it's basically just a USB harddrive with an mp3 player stuck on top.
erm... again, my archos can do this. you copy the firmware to the drive when it is off and then turn it back on to activate it.
i guess these claims work for the CF world, but that's not really clarified in their statement. and it's not that i'm knocking this product. i might have actually gotten one instead of the archos if they had been available when i bought my archos. i'm just wondering if they can really make these claims...
Higher capacity 1.8" HD based players soon... (Score:2)
FYI - Info (Score:2)
I am an MP3 player junky and own many models ranging from MPMan, RIO500, RCA Lyra, RioVolt CD, Classic CD, Other various First gen CD's, Archos Jukebox, Etc..Etc..Etc. Bottom line:
1. The ability to use only external media is a plus. (I have fried 3 players via data transfer to internal memory. I purchased a CF reader to load data onto the cards so that the actual player never gets harmed during data transfer.)
1A. Compact Flash as the external media. (Has anyone seen Smart Media, MMC, or Sony Memory Sticks that hold 256 Meg, 512 Meg??? -- I dont think so.)
2. CD type MP3 players are nice...the riovolt is a cool player...however I have found that these type of players are 2 big, fragile, and skip prone to be of much use in most "outdoor" type situations.
3. No external program needed to copy files to memory card. Anyone who has tried to put mp3's...err...mpx's onto the RCA lyra knows what I mean...
4. Battery life must be good. 10+ hours. This excludes the "hard drive" type players. They are not only as fragile as the CD's, but they will suck batteries at a rate similar to a laptop.
So far the Nex II is the only player I have purchased that meets all the above.
Shock and Shuffle (Score:2, Informative)
For one, they are amazingly shock-resistant, even with the Microdrive. Be sure to get a 1G microdrive, and not a 340; the 340 pulls more power and is much less shock proof. Switching up to a 1G microdrive made all the difference; the player gets a good bouncing around in the fairing pocket, but no skips.
For two, the shuffle algorithm on this player needs help. The controls are a bit hard to operate with motorcycle gloves on, so most 'wingers just leave themselves to the mercy of the Shuffle setting. This thing likes to pick about 40% of the songs on the disk and cycle through them a few times before grabbing another 'chunk'. I'd much prefer the entire catalog be shuffled once (at the time Shuffle is selected) and then played through like a list that can be stopped and restarted. Only doing another 'shuffle' operation would change the order. Many MP3 players have this problem.
Other than those two comments, I dearly love this device. I got one w/o any CF cards for $79(!!), and threw away the headphones like everybody else. I share the Microdrives between the MP3 player and my Canon D30 digital SLR camera, and there are zero issues. It's fun being able to jam to great tunes on a ride, stop, swap to the D30 and take a few photos at a pretty vista, then put the microdrive back in the MP3 player and keep listenin'.
Glaring firmware bug/misfeature: subdirectories! (Score:2, Informative)
If you store your music files on the CF card like this:
The NexII (with v1.4c firmware) CAN'T SEE any of your music. It will only search one directory level deep. So "/Album/01-Song.mp3" works fine.
It's not a big problem when you know about it, but it sucks when you forget to shuffle the files and find out only when you go to listen to them.
I've emailed Frontier Labs about this, and they are aware of the problem. I have hope that a future firmware release could do better. If it bothers you too, consider emailing them today.
I've got one too. (Score:2, Informative)
I've used mine with a W2K laptop as music depot and find that for reasons that may be generic to W2K or specific to my laptop, it bluescreens rather than properly dismounting the USB drive feature, but I have a CF-PCMICA adapter that works fine and is a lot faster.
I also get a lot more than 12 hours from a set of batteries: a lightly used set just lasted a 14.5 hour plane trip and are still going strong. This with the NCP 64MB flash card that came from dataviz.com (total price $99 incl. card).
Similarly I bought this player for it's CF+ (or CF type II) compatibility, and wouldn't consider any other media format.
An additional complaint I would raise is that there's no headroom to the amplifier. If you exceed the output it makes a very loud pop (for example on every drum beat). Use it with high db/mw (high efficiency) headphones if you like loud music. They should soft limit the output or use a better output amp.
Another feature would be to add a "resume play" mode so it picks up where it left off. I used it skiing and in some long lift lines it turned itself off from pause meaning I heard the first few songs of the card over and over. (Yeah, yeah, you can index through pretty easily but that's hard to do with gloves on.)
I also find the battery cover disturbingly dainty, and the case around the batteries frighteningly flexible. I'd suggest that they install a charge pump and let the thing recharge NiMh AA's off the USB source, which would take overnight.
Re:planning to buy a riovolt myself -probs (Score:2, Informative)
OTOH, the jog button is great, battery life with MP3s is better than 10 hours (get those green and white rechargeables with the yellow charger for $15 at Wally-World), and it does a beautiful job playing CDs, much better than my Sony CD player. Note - battery life is only 3 hours when you play CDs.
Re:planning to buy a riovolt myself -probs (Score:2)
I wouldn't train for a marathon with an MP3 CD player, because it definately does have moving parts, but the solid state stuff would be just fine.
Re:planning to buy a riovolt myself (Score:2, Informative)
Mod this and parent down - offtopic.
Re:Does it play all mp3s? (Score:1)
Insightful !?! (Score:1)
This is insightful how?
Steve M
Re: Oxymoron (Score:2)