TiVo switches off UK sales 254
SmackCrackAndPot writes "On the TiVo Community forum, there is an announcement that TiVo will be switching off UK sales.
This was previously reported in November at
BizTech Library.
It's probably not too surprising, after the BBC
spammed TiVo owners with a new comedy show."
interesting. (Score:4, Funny)
at least thats my take on things.
xao
Re:interesting. (Score:2, Funny)
The least they could do is make the TiVOs record Coupling. If the BBC wants to force me to watch Kate Isitt for hours on end, who am I to complain?
How about Canada? (Score:2, Insightful)
This doesn't look good for the future of a Canadian version of the TiVo.
Re:How about Canada? (Score:2)
Re:How about Canada? (Score:2)
Remember when Joey was pretending to sell Degrassi grass?
Good times.
Everybody wants something
they take your money
and never give up
The Zit Remedy ROCK!
CBC News! (Score:2)
Re:How about Canada? (Score:2)
Sky (Sat), NTL and Telewest (Cable) do not offer "video on demand"
They did NOT spam (Score:5, Informative)
Remember TiVo makes ZERO dollars from hardware sales, they are solely supported by subscription revenues, ad placements, and selling marketing data.
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:5, Informative)
Whether people want to consider what TiVo did SPAM or not doesn't make much difference. It had absolutely nothing to do with TiVo's decision. Suggesting that it did makes the original poster, and slashdot look like idiots to any informed observer - which is to say, pretty much "status quo."
TiVo simply hasn't found a manufacturer who wants to build and sell TiVo equipment for the U.K. without a subsidy. Given TiVo's need to pare expenses to reach break even before they run out of cash, there really is no other option than to pull the plug.
As for the "SPAM" issue. I enjoy about 75% of the promotional content that TiVo records automatically. Some folks complain about the extra menu item that becomes available when you've got SPAM, but it doesn't bother me in the least. I can just ignore it. It doesn't use my space and it will go away on it's own after a while.
Yes, you are welcome to consider it SPAM and decline to buy a TiVo because of it.
Scheduling Question (Score:2)
Does the user get the ultimate say?
Re:Scheduling Question (Score:4, Informative)
In fact, it won't even change the channel on you if you happen to be watching something.
I was up the other night sleepless, flipping channels when TiVo asked if it could change the channel. I was suprised because I didn't remember setting anything up for 3:30 am on the Discovery Channel, but I let it go because I thought maybe my wife had set to record something.
So, it changed the channel (with my permission) and proceeded to start recording some previews for "Daredevil". I decided I'd rather go back to some documentary about Rhinos humping or something I was previously watching, so it let me change the channel without complaining that I was interrupting a scheduled recording or anything.
It went back and picked up the movie previews the next night, I guess because they showed up in a couple days.
I guess I was a little wary that TiVo was recording what amounts to ads at first. But I really don't mind that much now. Some of the stuff like best buy kind of turns me off, a few things like the daredevil previews I liked, and the rest I really don't even care about.
Besides, isn't there a backdoor code or something to keep TiVo from recording these?
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:2)
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:3)
It changed channels without asking (I'd actually changed channels to watch the News and lost the first few minutes because of it). The only obvious way to stop it recording was to reboot the Tivo.
Amusingly, because the TV schedules are basically fiction over hear the programme ran late and missed half of it anyway
btw. I don't think this is why Thomson (*not* Tivo.. I do wish the news monkeys would get something accurate for once) stopped producing Tivos... it was just plain lack of sales, plus the fact that the best advertising slogan that Tivo themselves could come up with is 'It pauses live TV!' (well whoopee doo... That's sure worth £400 of my money...)
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, it is solicited. When you sign up for Tivo, you agree to let them send these ads. And you can easily opt out-- just cancel your subscription.
I really don't see the big deal. The ads do not come out of the thirty (or whatever) hours that were advertised when you bought your system. True you might get an extra thirty minutes-- maybe even an hour-- if the space wasn't allocated, but as has previously been pointed out, the ads help subsidize the subscription, and every once in a while, contain something of interest.
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:2)
That's an absurd definition. All advertising is unsolicited. Those commercials I sat through when I watched CSI tonight? Unsolicited. The ads I see when I read my newspaper every morning? Unsolicited. The (gasp!) ads (gasp!) on Slashdot (gasp) that I don't see because I use a filtering proxy (yay)? Unsolicited.
You should come up with a better definition of spam, methinks.
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:3, Interesting)
This is getting way off topic, but I have to bite. Using your definition, how can a t-shirt with a logo not be spam? I didn't ask to see it, and yet, I'm being subjected to the message when you were the shirt.
Re:They did NOT spam (Score:2)
YHBT (Score:4, Informative)
Now HAND.
Re:YHBT (Score:2)
Re:YHBT (Score:4, Informative)
Thompson really have stopped manufacturing hardware. The Tivo servive will continue, but buying new boxes is going to become impossible pretty soon.
Re:YHBT (Score:5, Insightful)
It has been all but impossible to buy a TiVo in the UK for the last few months. This is not news.
Equally, the idea that TiVo will pull the plug on the UK market is ridiculous.
They have 35,000 subscribers paying £10 ($15) per month, and just two employees. So... £350,000 revenues a month, two staff, a couple of servers, a few phone calls. They must have some pretty expensive offices for the UK operation not to be profitable.
My forecast: when TiVo the company (ticker: TIVO) becomes profitable in the back half of '03, then management will again turn their eyes to other markets: Canada, Australia, UK, etc.
Anyone care to bet I'm wrong?
The poor children heard urinal cake humor. (Score:5, Funny)
For crying out loud, those people are just looking for something to complain about (which I'm sure you /. folks will understand ;-)). It's not like the show is filled with porn, it looks like the show is like any other brain-dead sitcom. I can just imagine the 10 year old boys waking early on Saturday morning and finding this illicit show on their Tivo. As they watched the tittilating comedy with jokes about urinal cakes, their eyebrows twitched nervously, and they repeatedly looked over their shoulder to see if Mom or Dad were walking in.
Jeesh.
--naked [slashdot.org]
Re:The poor children heard urinal cake humor. (Score:2, Insightful)
Oh, come on. (Score:2)
It uses space set asside by the OS so it doesn't even lower your capacity*.
* unless you were an early adopter which didn't have a space reserve
Re:Oh, come on. (Score:2)
My Tivo was advertised as having 30 hours of record time. In fact it gives me slightly more then that, even with the reserved space otherwise allocated (Unfortunately, I can't be specific since I have upgraded my hard drive). If they were falsely advertising the systems, I could understand people being upset. Since they aren't, just deal with it.
I am never going to buy a tivo if they don't even admit my ownership over the hardware.
Oh, in that case, I'm sure they will immediately change the policy.
Re:Oh, come on. (Score:2)
Re:The poor children heard urinal cake humor. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The poor children heard urinal cake humor. (Score:2, Funny)
"Post-watershed" (Score:2, Informative)
This [itc.org.uk] is a page with relevant legal regulations that are implicated...
Hope that clears up any confusion.
Re:"Post-watershed" (Score:2, Funny)
Re:"Post-watershed" (Score:2)
Re:"Post-watershed" term (Score:2, Funny)
A geographic watershed is a region that drains to a single river/lake etc. It is bounded by a line of high ground that differentiates it from the surrounding other watershed areas.
The phrase "watershed event" is used to denote a particular point at which things become easier - i.e. "The advent of peer-to-peer filesharing was a watershed devent for the distribution of music". :-)
So it would seem that this usage of watershed is referring to a point of demarcation -- in this case a time of day.
We are separated by a common language. Sometime I should put my experience on using a Haynes automotive service manual to pull an engine. Language provided an amusing mis-step.
So I conclude, perhaps incorrectly, that is the point after which programming goes downhill.
Re:"Post-watershed" (Score:3, Informative)
This [bbc.co.uk] is a link to a relevant page about the BBC's [bbc.co.uk] policy on family viewing and the 9pm "watershed," while this [itc.org.uk] is the equivalent from the ITC. [itc.org.uk]
Insane... (Score:4, Funny)
The Other Tivo (Score:5, Informative)
Sky+ = TiVo-UK (Score:3, Interesting)
The Sky+ on-screen branding is different, and the hardware is integrated into your decoder box but it's exactly the same system, and (afaik) the subscription support is farmed out by Sky to TiVo.
I have a standalone TiVo branded unit hooked into my sky box (which was bought back when we had cable) and whenever we have Sky engineers out they comment that it's the same system, most are interested in how the non-integrated version compares (the answer is that it's very good but occasionally fluffs channel changes which Sky+ doesn't.)
For those of you not in the UK, Sky are the dominant multichannel TV providers (think Microsoft if it helps) with the two cable co.s trailing ever further behind in market share (last time I looked I think they collectively had about something like 20% and falling) Telewest (one of the two cable co.s) actually altered the software in many of their set-top boxes to make it incompatible with ToVo about 18months ago (which is one thing that promted me to switch) so really the only UK TiVo market is Sky customers, who are all still able to upgrade to Sky+ aka integrated-TiVo.
While it does rather worryingly smack of on impending media-monopoly in the UKs PVR sector, TiVo's announcement is most emphatically NOT a sign that they're flagging in the UK - quite the reverse: back-door TiVo sales through Sky+ are healthy and on the increase.
Re:Sky+ = TiVo-UK (Score:3, Informative)
British Sky Broadcasting market their own PVR called Sky+ which uses their own software developed from the codebase of the regular Sky Digibox (which is based on WinCE IIRC). Sky Subscriber Services handle the billing and technical support of this device as well, alongside a regular Sky TV subscription.
Re:Sky+ = TiVo-UK (Score:2)
Re:Sky+ = TiVo-UK *WRONG* (Score:5, Informative)
Maybe you're confused because TiVo was marketed in the UK by Sky, and TiVo used to have a "supported by Sky" flash on the main menu?
Re:Sky+ = TiVo-UK *WRONG* (Score:2)
ehh... BBC = no commercials? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:ehh... BBC = no commercials? (Score:2, Funny)
Whats the selling hook? Pause live cricket matches? They're so boring they're self-pausing.
Re:ehh... BBC = no commercials? (Score:2)
There are commercials on the BBC, but they only advertise BBC products and services.
Tivo not necessarily pulling out of UK (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.europemedia.net/shownews.asp?ArticleID= 13703 [europemedia.net]
Thompson, Tivo's manufacturer is the one that pulled out - Tivo is still looking for new manufacturers.
Re:Tivo not necessarily pulling out of UK (Score:2)
Re:Tivo not necessarily pulling out of UK (Score:2)
Anyone know if they are planning on releasing machines here in the UK?
Thanks,
Mike.
the gilette phenomenon (Score:5, Insightful)
It worked extremely well for Sony -- selling the playstation at zero (sometimes negative) margins, then making money by being the sole licenser of games (that they didn't spend money developing) for the platform.
I think the xbox is taking financially because Microsoft went out and bought a substantial number of good game development companies who haven't been able to release a seriously block-busting game
TiVo is a completely different story. They're selling the consoles at or below cost
The population of TiVo users has to grow -- and that means they need to lower the cost of their consoles. Dramatically. Even if it means reducing the functionality of the box. When TiVo costs $50, and you can buy it at Wallgreens, that's when advertising and media companies are going to sit up and thing "Holy crap, that's a huge captive audience."
Re:the gilette phenomenon (Score:2)
Um, unless you expect them to sell them for $50 and eat another $50 on each box, this can't be done. The things *need* hard drives, reduced functionality or no.
Re:the gilette phenomenon (Score:4, Informative)
TiVo isn't selling the consoles at all. They license out the hardware to companies to produce, and it's up to the companies to make a profit, which is doable. In the past TiVo had to pay the companies to produce the systems, which is a practice they're getting out of. The hardware isn't that expensive to make anymore.
there aren't enough TiVo users to convince media companies to pay big bucks for the spots
Hrm, I'd say 500,000 active subscribers is a pretty decent captive audience. And, better yet, it's advertising that you can get exact numbers for the number of eyeballs -- at least in terms of households. TiVo knows when you watch the ads.
But, you're right... not enough advertisers. I guess that's why I nearly always have something recorded from TiVo. Currently it's Daredevil trailers. Next will be Matrix, Hulk, and other Time Warner movies (I don't recall the entire list). There may be some other stuff in between if time allows, I have no idea.
The population of TiVo users has to grow
You're right, and it is. From their last 10-Q:
Our subscriber base increased 82% over the third quarter of fiscal year 2002, from 280,000 to 510,000 subscribers due to increased consumer demand.
Re:the gilette phenomenon (Score:2)
The problem with that business model is that the price for the initial hardware and software is so stratospheric that it'll die in its infancy. The price won't come down, because it won't be around long enough to do so.
As far as the subscription goes - if you don't like the Gillette model, there's an option out. Buy lifetime. Then you get all the razor blades for free, at least until the razor itself breaks. Even at the new price of $300 (effective March 3 or 4), it's a deal.
And while everyone keeps complaining about the TiVo guide data being overpriced, it's really quite a bit more than guide data. You're also paying for continual software updates (yes, I know, that's another annoyance for some people) and new features. I bought my first TiVo nearly 3 years ago and have gone from v1.2 of the software to v3.0. The added features have been significant - wishlists, season pass sorting, additional recording features, program quality improvements, unofficial broadband support, UI improvements, etc. It looks like it may be the end of the line on significant software upgrades for Series1 hardware though, and that does annoy me. We will see.
The problem with allowing alternate subscription services is that you've now cut TiVo out of the money entirely. They don't produce the hardware, and you're not giving them any revenue from the service... you say "well, charge enough for the hardware", but that's not the business they're in. And if they charged enough, up front, for the hardware to cover a profit then the TiVos would probably be in the $2k range. And as much as I love my TiVo, it's not worth that much to me.
Re:the gilette phenomenon (Score:2)
The US Army immediately ordered thousands upon thousands of safety razors for their troops. Gillette's invention was a monumental success.
Almost immediately, Gillette, lifelong socialist and despiser of wealth, found himself one of the richest men in the country.
Ah, sweet irony.
I could never get it anyway (afaik) but ... (Score:3, Informative)
Now I had been thinking for a while that an open/distributed tv listings service for Ireland would be great, but that I might find little help in putting it together! But perhaps if Tivo is closing in the U.K. there might be an existing marketplace who were paying £10/month who are looking for an alternative. I can't imagine it would be the most impossible task to fool a present tv into using the free service. You'd have to reverse engineer the format used by the service, and then (to save making people solder) you'd need to deal with the fact the Tivo has a telephone connection and dials it's own number. You could establish some phone numbers to feed the demand and use a simple router to translate all dialed numbers to the new number or you could make a server to run on a PC (with a modem) that answers the calls and feeds it the data (which the server keeps up to date). There is only one response to this (and sky's attempt to take the £10/month for themselves) and that's to take the money away from them!
Re:I could never get it anyway (afaik) but ... (Score:2)
I meant to put in a link to pace, so here [pace.co.uk] it is. I hope I don't have half a link in the parent, it looks of here (mozilla could be forgiving me).
Also does anyone know reasonably priced cards with decent drivers providing hardware accelerated TV Capture? What about hardware accelerated Video capture? And btw I mean under Linux and full PAL (preferably all audio formats aswell)? No matter how many times I try to find a card I can feel happy buying, I just can't! How come these guys can build Tivo's so cheap? How come no-one is building PC hardware from the same chips etc or if they are is the code all locked away?
Re:I could never get it anyway (afaik) but ... (Score:2)
Re:I could never get it anyway (afaik) but ... (Score:2)
While not free, there is Digiguide [digiguide.com] which has a fairly comprehensive set of TV listings for £6.99/a year (about $10). I don't think that thy publish the protocol used, but I'm fairly sure it's been reverse-engineered, (there was an unofficial palm client floating around a whle back) and I' sure they're not going to complain, as long as you deliver a valid (i.e. paid for) registration key. More clients = more money for them.
Re:Setting up alternative service (Score:2)
Why I wouldn't buy TiVo.. (Score:2)
Re:Why I wouldn't buy TiVo.. (Score:2)
There's also the fact that you can use the TiVo like a "Smart VCR" to record shows without any listings...
So, unless you're completely clueless, a working TiVo will never be a "doorstop"...
Re:Why I wouldn't buy TiVo.. (Score:2)
My question now is, since TiVo licenses its technology to hardware manufacturers for free and ONLY makes money from the subscription service, how do they expect to make a money with the possibility of a popular free listing site popping up..?
Re:Why I wouldn't buy TiVo.. (Score:2)
Re:Why I wouldn't buy TiVo.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Support?????? Maybe in the past, but not anymore. The Tivo Series 2 boxes are locked down rather heavily. The boot ROM checks for a signed kernel, if it's not signed, it won't run. The kernel checks for modifications to the file system, if any are found it replaces the files and reboots. Although there have been some reports of hardware hacks to replace the ROM, it's not exactly what I would call "all of the support they give to the hacking community".
Not to mention the whole 3.2 backdoor code debacle. [slashdot.org] After thousands of hours of CPU time, the project had to be abandoned. The conclusion was that Tivo has either used an invalid hash or very long key sequence as the backdoor code in version 3.2, when previously the codes were short and easily hacked. It is just one more example of how hostile Tivo is becoming to hackers.
Tivo is attempting to create an image of greater security (keeping out the dirty hackers) on a software and hardware level in order to market the ability to distribute content with the Tivo as a DRM platform. If you can't hack it, you pretty much have to accept any restrictions they put on content delivered to you. They can deliver PPV events that are deleted after 1 day or not able to be recorded at all.
Fortunately, I have a Series 1 and can do whatever I like with it. I have a backup of every software revision Tivo has put out, so I can revert to an earlier version at any time. I certainly am not going to allow Tivo to send me any more updates, the boot ROM in the S1 is flashable so it's quite possible for Tivo to send down updates that lock me out of my machine.
New Tivo owners are not so lucky. There is no reverting to an earlier version of your brand-new Tivo. I have recommended Tivo to friends in the past but given the disregard for the community that has staunchly supported them (not only by buying subscriptions but by keeping extraction and guide replacement information difficult and obscure and by adding value for other users-free of charge) I don't know if I can still recommend them. I do like the UI but what really got me to buy one was the hack potential. Now that they have no hack potential, the luster is gone and I see the company for what it is: moneygrubbing fools that will alienate their most loyal users for a few quick bucks.
What happens (Score:2)
Re:What happens (Score:3, Informative)
now if i could just get the cat to stop chewing on the IR blaster that controls my cable box.
now with the direct tv satellite version of Tivo you can record one show and watch another, or record 2 shows (this is because it records the already compressed version of the show from satellite so it doesn't waste processor power on the encoding, saving plenty of processor for dual recording)
Re:What happens (Score:3, Informative)
Personally I'm in bet at 4am. Call me old if you like...
Anyhow, TiVo records under two circumstances: (1) You've asked it to (2) It's decided you might like it to, based on the thumbs up and thumbs down statistics you've given it.
When TiVo is not in "live TV" mode, i.e. playing back buffered stuff from the last half hour, it will change channel whenever it feels like it -- because it knows you're not watching live TV. The assumption is that you only ever watch TV via TiVo, and this is what you should do.
When you *are* watching live TV, TiVo will not attempt to change channel in order to record category (2) programs. If a category (1) program is coming up, it will pop up a dialogue, "You asked me to record xxxx, press OK to change channel or Cancel to stay on this channel and not record it after all".
Yes, if you're piping output from your cable box around the house, this might cause problems. Not many people are.
All TV is "spammed" -- it's a broadcast! (Score:4, Insightful)
All TVs, VCRs, and TiVos in the appropriate reception areas received the broadcast, if they were switched on and tuned to the right channel. I've never heard of anyone switching on the telly and shouting in horror, "I'm being spammed!". The TiVos also stored what they were receiving, as that's what they were designed to do with this special content. That really does make this a non-story.
Please reserve the word "spam" for individually addressed delivery systems delivering the same item to multiple recipients. Applying it to broadcast systems makes no sense at all.
Re:All TV is "spammed" -- it's a broadcast! (Score:2, Insightful)
You "might need something to make your dick bigger", or you "might want to work from home and make thousands of dollars licking envelopes", or you "might want to see barely-legal teens in provocative poses". That's all spam, because it shows up in your e-mail inbox under the guise of something you "might want". Obviously, most people don't want any of that, and even though it's just a matter of hitting the trash button on those messages, it's still infuriating to receive them in the first place.
With your TiVo, you have a limited resource (hard drive space) being taken up in significant quantities by each show, and TiVo tells you that you "might want to watch this show" even though there is no real heuristic for determining whether this is the case. And no, if(1){record("show")} does not count as a heuristic.
It's also different from broadcasting, because a broadcast program is shown by the TV station and then "goes away" in a sense. A program recorded to your TiVo stays around until you delete it, which makes it far different from a broadcast program. It's solely a marketing ploy to take advantage of that, and people don't like it when marketers invade their home without permission.
On a side note: There is another way to watch your TV. [mythtv.org]
Why jump to this conclusion? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Why jump to this conclusion? (Score:3, Informative)
Slightly wrong...
It's now called "DirecTV with TiVo". Billing is done through DTV, not TiVo, and guide updates are provided by DTV as well (which means program guide data can be different for DTiVos as compared to standalones).
DirecTV is still using the TiVo service, and paying TiVo a cut of the money.
Not the news you wanna hear.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Now I understand what all the fuss is about. You really have to sit down, pause a live broadcast, rewind it a bit, then start playing again to understand why this thing is so cool.
It's a pity that this device that makes me watch more TV is under fire by the TV Industry. Am I going to skip commercials? Yes. Am I going to skip every single commercial? Can't skip commercials while the show is originally airing. I'm using it to catch shows I hadn't seen yet. If the show's good, I'm going to watch it when it airs. The ads are still getting to me, even more so now that I have more shows I want to watch.
Okay, that horse has been beaten to death. It's just sad that these industries are so short sighted. I mean, think about it, the more fun TV is (i.e. trading shows...), the more interest is generated in seeking interesting content.
Okay, I'm not really on-topic anymore. Sorry. Just wanted to vent a bit. Hopefully you can imagine my reaction to the headline the day I bought the machine.
Re:Not the news you wanna hear.. (Score:2)
I watched Sky One for to hours yesterday. In one hour of television, 15 minutes were adverts. Many of the adverts were repeated. Roughly 40% did not apply to me in any way (I have no wish o by feminine hygiene products, or consolidate my debt, for example). Of the remaining ones, most (okay, all) were so irritating that I made a note of the products concerned, so I wouldn't accidentally purchase any of them. When will advertises learn that irritating their potential customers is not a good idea?
The Wider View (Score:5, Informative)
There are theoretically 5 analogue terrestrial channels in the UK, and in many places only 4.
There is also no single widely available cable network either and if you do have access, it's typically a local monopoly and it's pretty expensive - typically £20-30/month for a descent package.
The Sky (satellite) service is polular but also expensive.
Several years ago a digital terrestrial service was launched and failed miserably and with much fanfare. This has recently been re-launched as entirely an entirely free-to-view service and looks set to succeed.
Now as you can see, we have a real mess of technologies here and if a company such as Tivo wants to sell a premium recorder product they've got a problem. Their marked is spread across satellite, and a multiplicity of analogue/digital terrestrial and cable formats.
What decoders do they build into their device?
1. Sky which re-transmits all of the (good) free-to-view channels have their own HD based recorder.
2. People with only terrestrial analogue are happy with VCRs
3. The cable market is fragmented technologically.
4. Digital terrestrial is a new but very small market.
So they gave up, and I don't blame them - it's a mess.
B.T.W. Pace have a digital terrestrial HD recorder which might be interesting but it was due before Christmas and there's still no sign.
Wow I'm boring.
Re:The Wider View (Score:2)
TWW
Re:The Wider View (Score:2)
Really? I pay £5/month for cable TV, which gives me far more channels than I want. I pay an additional £35/month for a 1Mbit Cable modem down the same wire. Split 4 ways (shared student house) this works out at £10/month each for broadband and cable TV. The TV portion of this is decode MPEG2 to analogue video -> digitise -> encode to MPEG2 which just seems like a horrible solution) I would buy one. Since I can't, I haven't. The digiboxes supplied by my cable supplier (NTl) are standard models made by Pace, based on a standard for digital TV. If you buy your own igibx, all you need to do is move the card which supplies the encryptino key to the new box. The analogue TV that comes down the same cable can b decoded with a standard TV card. I'm not sure what cable companies you have in your area, but in Swansea (S. Wales) we don't have this problem.
TiVo NOT Pulling Out Of UK (Apparently) (Score:2)
According to the thread this is not the first time this mistake has been made.
TiVo died because UK already had better: Sky Plus (Score:5, Insightful)
TiVo may have seemed revolutionary in the USA, but in the UK it was just one of many enhanced TV systems.
TiVo's biggest rival, Sky Plus (Sky+) [sky.com] did everything that TiVo did, and more, came pre-packaged with an installation engineer's visit and had the branding and backing of the UK's largest pay-TV provider, Sky (backed by Rupert Murdoch/Fox corp).
Sky already had a shedload of TV toys [sky.com]. For instance, I remember one of my business meetings in Texas two years ago, the CEO of this oil firm was saying something like "In the future, you'll be able to watch a football match and zoom in on individual players".
Then I glanced down at the predicted coverage map for my GPRS phone in Texas...
Re:TiVo died because UK already had better: Sky Pl (Score:2)
1) Tivo is not pulling out of the UK, Thomson have just stopped making the boxes. Other manufacturers may well step in to start making them.
2) Tivo was launched in the UK around a year earlier than Sky+, so to say it failed because the UK already had something better is obviously wrong.
Re:TiVo died because UK already had better: Sky Pl (Score:4, Interesting)
Erm, "everything that TiVO did, and more"? Sky+ doesn't support suggestions, it doesn't support wishlists, season passes don't work as reliably (and until a recent patch used to fail extremely regularly), etc. Sky+ is a fairly good product, but it's much younger than TiVo, and it shows.
Re:TiVo died because UK already had better: Sky Pl (Score:2)
Let's put this to bed once and for all shall we?
Stop listening to Dixons salesmen.
Sky+ is *not* repeat *not* a Tivo. Nor is it anything like. It is pitched at the 'digital vcr' market and is doing quite well there. It doesn't have any of the enhanced Tivo funcionality (proper season passes, wishlists, suggestions) but has the advantage that it can record the mpeg stream directly (which AFAIK no Tivo can do).
Re:TiVo died because UK already had better: Sky Pl (Score:2)
so, new question: is the service side of TiVo in the UK likely to be affected by this in any way? TiVo say no, but then again they would wouldn't they?
Hoax (Score:2)
The posts below the one referenced indicate this is a hoax. If you read the FAQ it contains the following question:
"I just read TiVo is going to pull out of the UK - is this true? Where can I get a new TiVo box from?
TiVo are not pulling out of the UK. Read the real truth here. [tivofaq.co.uk]"
I can't believe that story actually made it on to slashdot.
Has it got so bad that now even the admins don't read the article?!
Nick...
Re:Hoax (Score:2)
However, it comes to the same thing in the end.
I went to comet to try and buy a Tivo on Sunday. They told me they'd run out and no replacement was expected.
If Tivo arn't getting any new customers then any rate of churn is going to see their subscription income dwindle to zero in short order.
And they'll shut it down.
Re:Hoax (Score:2)
Try actually *buying* one... staff Dixon's Group stores (including Dixons & Currys) claim never to have heard of it.
Our local (Edinburgh) Currys superstore has a total of *one* in stock, which the sales staff seem to be doing their best to not sell (compared to the sky+ boxes).
The Economist has also written about this today. (Score:2)
The Economist [economist.com] have published an article [economist.com] on the subject today. They conclude that while the TiVo company may be struggling, they revolution they started will continue, as the technology is licensed into a broad range of set top boxes and TVs.
They also predict that TV advertising will not be killed in the revolution, just the bad advertisements.
TiVo the wrong product for the UK (Score:4, Insightful)
The thing is, they released it in the UK after digital TV was "widely" available. IMHO, most of the people that would consider buying a TiVo are likely to be people who have digital TV.
DVB has digital, in-band listings information that can be updated in real-time if the line-up changes. Additionally, with something like Sky+ or one of the yet-to-surface digital terrestrial or cable DVR boxes, you don't have to decode the MPEG to analogue and then re-encode it to MPEG before you can record it. That makes for a cheaper box, with higher quality audio/video and better compression (so more stuff can be recorded).
I'm guessing that demand for integrated DVR systems will be much higher than it ever was for TiVo.
Re:TiVo the wrong product for the UK (Score:2)
It's a shame Sky use such a horribly low bitrate that it probably wouldn't make much difference. A properly setup analogue system used to be much better.
Firewire outputs (Score:3, Interesting)
It's a great shame that people like Sky and NTL (digital satellite and cable operators in the UK) don't put IEEE1394 firewire connectiors (in and out) on all their equipement, so that instead of getting a nice digital signal in MPEG 2 format - converting it to analog, then reencoding it back to MPEG 2 when it would be so easy for the box to just stream out MPEG 2 so that the original source could be recorded unaltered. I can't believe that some enterprising hacker hasn't made an add on board for DVB or digital cable that you can shove inside your box so you can stream the MPEG 2 stream to a PC for digital recording.
One day all video recorders will be firewire only, record digitally, have access to the program guide and have a built in DVD writer for making recorded shows 'portable'. The thing is, due to lack of innovation, it'll probably take 5-10 years, even though all the technology to do this exists now.
Nick...
Re:Firewire outputs (Score:2)
Nick...
rumours from the future (Score:2)
I expect to see a product (packaged as a 6" cube) in the shops by next Christmas.
Rubbish. (Score:2)
If you were going stay small, you'd need a mini-itx [mini-itx.com] or similar, and one of them plus case plus a video capture card would already put you up to your £150 limit, and that's before you add in memory and a hard drive, not to mention a remote control.
Even after that, you need the software for it, and none of the free projects doing this kind of thing have reached anywhere near Tivo functionality yet.
The only way you'd make it cheaper than a Tivo is if you were using bits of old computers you've got lying around, which sure as hell isn't going to make it small or quiet.
Where the hell can I get a Tivo now? (Score:2)
Re:Could this hinder Linux? (Score:3, Interesting)
I'll take that bet. The government (even our corrupt American one) is hardly silly enough to intentionally put themselves sqaurely opposed to millions of individuals exercising their freedom to code and share software. That's alienating a very big demographic, (think of all the corporations going OSS to save money-- mine, for example, and we're a real estate firm). Furthermore, it's alienating a very pissed-off demographic with a lot of resources that will put up a big fight.
Most OSS/freedom issues are minor ones that involve particular lawsuits invoking everyone's favorite target, the DMCA, or silly proposed bills to mandate DRM or some such. Imagine, however, that the US Gov't decided to promote Windows usage by changing policy to only award contracts to organizations using M$ software (the only way, really, for them to push such a switch). Can you imagine the outrage from HP and IBM over such a policy? One of those open-source shops would file a project proposal on the spot, and then go immediately straight to the courts to challenge the rejection. And there's no possible way the government would be able to defend such a blanket policy. (There are rules which lay out the criteria on which the federal government can award contracts, etc.)
And don't even get me started on how absurd the suggestion is to use M$ Desktop Sharing for spying. The service doesn't run by default, and has to be set up by the user. And no properly configured would EVER let remote desktop traffic in or out.
So I'll take that bet. What are your terms? Let me know what the timetable is for when I can collect my money, and I'll e-mail you and we can work out the details
Re:couldnt delete? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:couldnt delete? (Score:2, Insightful)
I was shocked when I first moved to the US: the first time I watched TV there after arriving I saw Predator on the box at 10am Sunday morning. Being accustomed to the watershed, I didn't think it very appropriate, especially considering that is prime time for children.
The flip side to the watershed is that the content is often more mature, more risque, and less cut than what appears on US TV (which surprises most people as they expect the British to be particularly uptight and pridish.) It's nothing by continental European standards though
Re:couldnt delete? (Score:2)
I went to Dictionary.com [dictionary.com] , and looked it up: watershed [reference.com] .
It appears the third definition fits best:
So it's a critical turning point in broadcasting maturity levels. The other definitions are about the land mass that separates two bodies of water (or water flows, like rivers).
sad but true? (Score:3, Insightful)
I send out spam,
I eat my lunch,
I go to the lavatory...
On Wednesday I go channel surfing
with a no-spam TiVo equipped TV."
TiVo programming, at least at that point in time, allowed content such as trailers, etc. to be loaded onto the boxes without being requested by the end user. These were apparently considered to be ok for marketing purposes, etc. In this case, the BBC took advantage and loaded an entire program to everyone's box, clearly unaware of the public's concept of spam.
I think marketing wonks worldwide have gone down to the same lab, where the brain circuits relating to victimless crime, along with sociopathic attributes common to all spammers, are fused into one synapse that fires automatically when such keywords/phrases as 'customer benefit'; 'unique opportunity'; 'sureness of prospect' and 'special offer' are used in any conversation.
The BBC had no clue that what they were doing was objectional. That's the issue for me...they have their hand on the switch, yet they are out of touch with the tastes, attitudes and wishes of their customers.
Re:couldnt delete? (Score:3, Informative)
TiVo has the ability to record supplemental content like movie previews, behind-the-scenes footage, and "see this for more info" kind of advertising.
This content is generally accessible from a showcase section that you might browse to see what different networks are promoting, and I think they envisioned things like short broadcast ads that pop-up an on-screen TiVo icon to click for additional information. They also cycle some of this content through a listing on your main menu to promote it independently.
In the UK, the BBC purchased one of these main menu ads to record an entire episode of a new program.
Viewers in the UK were livid about 2 things. First, they felt that recording an entire program during prime time was going too far in exercising corporate control over their equipment. Secondly, they were upset that the program was adult content (post-watershed means it was rated such that it isn't suitable to air during "family hours.") that parents could not block with parental controls or delete from the main menu.
TiVo absolutely learned a lot from that incident (they had inadvertly overlooked the parental control issues) and they will approach new advertising sales opportunities very differently in the future.
Now, having said that, the real reason that they are shutting down UK sales is that the manufacturer of the TiVo box in the UK stopped making it. TiVo doesn't have the capital to invest in the UK market and have shifted to an approach of merely supporting the existing users, but nobody new. In that scenario, no need to run a sales office. Lay them off and spend the money getting new US subscribers.
Re:any know the tech of how the BBC did this? (Score:2)
You can turn off this feature.
Any UK tivo that either had the feature turned off, or had another show recording at the time this comedy came on did NOT get this show. But the BBC did pay to have all "available" units record the show, that comes pretty close to spam IMO.
Under the normal sorting of the recorded list these shows are at the very bottom of the listing and have a different icon than shows you've requested. I sort my list alphabetically so the "you might like" shows are mixed in with the other shows, but they still have a different icon.
This recording of "shows you might like" is the source of the "My Tivo thinks I'm gay" and "my tivo thinks i'm a fascist" stories. The algorithym used to decide what should be recorded for you may look at past recordings and decide you like gay themed shows (or cowboy themed shows or science fiction or so on). You can tweak the choices by rating shows with the thumbs up or thumbs down buttons.
Re:any know the tech of how the BBC did this? (Score:2)
Nick...
Re:No surprise there (Score:2)
There is *no new news*. Tivo have *not* pulled out of the UK. Service is still available. This whole damned article is just a repeat of news from last Semptember.