iPhoto 2: The Missing Manual 107
iPhoto 2: The Missing Manual | |
author | David Pogue, Derrick Story, Joseph Schorr |
pages | 336 |
publisher | O'Reilly/Pogue Press |
rating | 8 |
reviewer | Tony Williams |
ISBN | 0596005067 |
summary | An good guide to iPhoto2 for beginner to intermediate users |
One of the things I like about Apple's iApps is that they hide a great deal of complexity behind a simple interface; they do indeed make the complex simple. The drawback to this is that I often find myself ignoring the more powerful aspects of the application and never using it to its full. It was here that the Missing Manual came to my help.
The target audience for this book would probably be a little less technical than myself or the average Slashdot reader, however when I find myself in a field I don't understand well I don't mind a little stuff for the absolute newbie. This book has an entire first section that deals with photography and digital photography in particular that may be a total repeat for some, I found it a welcome reminder of how to get a good photograph along with some extremely useful hints about the new technology and choosing a camera. It covers such topics as composition and lighting for a host of different situations such as landscapes, night, portraits, children and sports.
It then goes on to a section of similar size on the basics that covers getting the photos from your camera to the Mac, organising the photos using albums and keywords and then editing your shots.
A third section covers the various ways of publishing and showing your photos such as printing, CD, and web pages, and a final section with some tricks and tips on things like managing your libraries. There are two appendices: one very useful troubleshooting guide, and a menu-by-menu look at iPhoto 2.
I particularly appreciated the thorough treatment of how to get the most out of iPhoto when printing photo books and creating web pages in the third section; it was here that I really discovered how little I knew from just 'playing' with the application. The book is peppered with useful information and tips that take you beyond the level that most of us discovered when we ran and used the program. The authors have also provided some marvelous explanations of what is going on, the "why" as well as the "what."
The book is well written with a readable, light, almost witty style that somehow deceives the reader as to the depth of the material being covered. It is only when I reflected back on how much the book taught me that I realised how well it had done the job.
O'Reilly have their usual web page for the book with a sample chapter, Table of Contents and Index. Pogue Press have a neat idea - they have a page that features all the software mentioned in the book. A neat idea that I liked a lot.
In conclusion, I would recommend this book to everyone who is serious about digital photography on their Mac. If you have used iPhoto for a long time you may think the book a waste, but I'd be surprised if even long-time users didn't get their money's worth out of this book. I much preferred the style of this volume to IDG's iPhoto 2 for Dummies , the only other real competitor for this volume was iPhoto 2 for Mac OS X: A Visual Quickstart Guide , and that is a shorter volume with less depth and less advice for photography and nothing on the camera technology, though I think Engst's writing seems a bit clearer at times.
I wouldn't buy a "Missing Manual" for every iApp or the operating system, but if you take the slogan for the series seriously, "The book that should have been in the box" (for the box is entirely devoid of books), I think they are a marvelous help for becoming a true 'power user.'
You can purchase iPhoto2: The Missing Manual from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
cheaper (Score:1, Informative)
Re:cheaper (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Bookpool (Score:3, Informative)
You'd think that the geeks would be using bookpool as opposed to Amazon.
Re:cheaper (Score:3, Informative)
Re:cheaper (Score:1)
I wasn't only suggesting Bookpool because of price. I would rather deal with a small company if given the choice. I'm not really fond of Amazon or Buy.com. I have had good experiences with Bookpool.
BTW: Bookpool was still cheaper than everybody on the list from allbookstores.com.
Options (Score:5, Informative)
Not necessary. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not necessary. (Score:4, Insightful)
Apple and Microsoft _should_ be shipping manuals with their products, hands down. Sure I could spend my time playing and figure out a way to do things and yes, the net is a great resource, but I'd rather have a vendor-provided method for training and get my work done so I can play with my Nintendo.
Re:Not necessary. (Score:2, Insightful)
That's just what they want you to think. When Windows 95 shipped, the thinking at the time (and still is today) was that consumers would perceive software to be easy to use if it had no "need" of a manual.
Dude, there is a monstrous difference between Windows 95 and iPhoto. Or even between an operating system and a consumer application.
iPhoto is a very simple, mostly intuitive program whose features can be described / summarized in only a few pages of paper.
I can't say the same for Windows 95.
Why a manual (Score:5, Insightful)
I think that would help Apple out a lot, to have more in-depth PDFs on their iApps, like iMovie, iDVD, and iPhoto
I think that would help more and more normal mac users become power mac users (get it! powermac
Re:Why a manual (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why a manual (Score:2, Interesting)
iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:5, Insightful)
The best thing about this is they there are no installers to run; they are "drag and drop" installed applications. But I can also understand why people like iPhoto.
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:2, Insightful)
Of course, if convenience did not equal dumbed down, this wouldn't be a problem.
iPhoto is good for one thing only; getting pictures off a digital camera. It won't even grab the movies that are on a lot of newer cameras... how lame is that? And the directory structure is horrid as well.
*shudder*
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:4, Informative)
As opposed to a single directory full of P07310003.jpg files, as would be the case for the 80% of users who don't know how to automatically script downloading and renaming of the photos from the camera? Personally, while I wouldn't want to navigate the directory structure manually very often, the naming conventions are clear and for the target audience mostly transparent anyway.
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:1)
That's why EXIF-Renamer is such a nice program. It has selectable and customizable renaming settings. I have Image Capture call it while importing photos.
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:1)
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:1)
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:4, Informative)
If that's more than you need, then great, although you're not missing anything by replacing a free application with shareware.
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:1)
All the apps I use are freeware, except for GraphicConverter, which I already had when I finally got my camera. If I wanted to, I could replace it with Gimp.
As for organizing, it keep them in a single directory with several sub-directories. It's easy.
iPhoto is free, Graphic Converter is shareware (Score:2)
Re:iPhoto Is Nice... (Score:5, Insightful)
Having a monolithic app has it's drawbacks, but Apple has to offer a one-stop app for what is probably their median user group. Digital photography use among most computer users is exploding, and it would be wrong for Apple not to provide a slick single interface aimed directly at these users.
The UNIX guy in me agrees with the notion that large apps can be a pain, in principle. Many small apps that do one or two things extremely well can often be more satisfying to use than a single monolithic app that is a pain to navigate, offers features you don't need and hides the ones you do.
Well, I would have agreed that iPhoto is perhaps overkill until I got a digital camera and hooked it up to my G4. Having an app that catalogs and organizes my photos, like iTunes (or any other digital music app) was so useful, I never looked back. The fact that it has facilities for smart backup to DVD, and other features I haven't even explored is just gravy. The UI fills me with a warm fuzzy, as well.
I'd have to say that iPhoto is one of those rare apps that manages to give most of us just about what we need, but no more. Between iPhoto and Photoshop Elements, this amateur photog (and recent convert from film cameras for holiday snaps and the like) has all he needs.
iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyhnow, iPhoto needs two things badly
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:1, Funny)
I have massive amounts of images that aren't p0rn either, they're "art".
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:5, Funny)
That's OK, even the more complicated MS programs never do the same thing twice...
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:2)
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:4, Informative)
Sure, they weren't hierarchically organized, but whatever.
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:2)
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:2)
You realize I'm not talking about albums, right? Rolls. Make sure iPhoto is showing you everything organized by roll.
iPhoto will display the folder names after import (Score:2)
And support for the little videos that digicams can take.
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:3, Interesting)
I would like it to import all of these images, use their directory names as Album names, and leave the images alone. In the hierarchical directory structure, they support easy web viewing using my image management tools (or any of the dozens of free tools out there).
The best app I have found for this is "Adobe Photo A
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:2)
It has a browser which "don't need no stinkin' import"
You have your files organized in the file system the way you want - and it browses them. The best of both worlds. Honestly, I really don't understand what iPhoto is for.
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:1)
Which, btw, are things I would want too.
Who knows, it might be a feature in the future.
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:4, Informative)
a great piece of freeware called iPhotoBuddy [nofences.net] allows you to create and select multiple photo libraries. I don't even have iPhoto in my dock any more because of this software. I keep 4 different libraries and about 3000ish photos (i have a digital camera and a puppy, bite me).
You simply choose which library you want to run - and it launches iPhoto with the corresponding library. My previously insanely slow library is now quick and easy, and iPhoto is a wonderful tool to use again, like when it first came out and I only had 500 pictures.
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:iPhoto needs some tweaks... (Score:2)
What they really need... (Score:2, Funny)
Missing legitimacy (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Missing legitimacy (Score:2)
Re:Missing legitimacy (Score:1)
But what about the plot? (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, wait...
Slashbot book review (Score:3, Informative)
iPhoto SLOOOOOW with big libraries (Score:1, Informative)
I imported my 3500+ digital pics I've taken over the years into iPhoto only to find that the application slows down to the point of unusability. Every few operations I attempted to perform would hang for a minute or more -- including simple things like seeing context menus. I did a usenet search and discovered that others had experienced a similar slowdown with large collections in iPhoto.
I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org (Score:1)
The problem with iPhoto is that it does not have a web interface. And sharing via iMac web services is tedious and limited in storage.
Pixory solves all of these problems. And best of all, of course, it runs on Linux!
www.pixory.org
Re:I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org (Score:1)
Re:I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org (Score:1)
Re:I prefer Pixory to iPhoto -- www.pixory.org (Score:1)
Re:gallery (Score:1)
I decided I wasn't going to renew my .Mac account, and immediately switched to Gallery for my picture publishing, and it's GREAT!
Pouge is Great! (Score:5, Informative)
OTOH, any Mac geek can find all of this info easily at MacOSXHints.com [macosxhints.com]
iPhoto for dummies not IDG (Score:3, Informative)
FYI.
iPhoto features (Score:5, Informative)
can't 'order prints' (Score:1)
and I've turned off my firewall, plugged my ibook straight into the cable modem, and have even tried it over my 56k modem.
Re:can't 'order prints' (Score:1)
Re:can't 'order prints' (Score:1)
Serious Work? (Score:2)
What? Look, this isn't a MacOS bash--I love my macs and use iPhoto all the time. But other than filling up iPhoto with thousands of photos (and that doesn't even count) what is 'serious work' with iPhoto? It's simply not that deep an application.
Re:iPhoto Problem (Score:2)
Re:iPhoto Problem (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:iPhoto Problem (Score:1)
1997 called [lowendmac.com] and they want their gripe back.
Re:iSlashdot Problem (Score:3, Funny)
I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Slashdot fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Slashdot screen for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 line troll from one message thread on the hard drive to another thread. 20 minutes. At home, on my Kur05hin account, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Slashdot, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.
In addition, during this troll transfer, Netscape will n
Re:iPhoto Problem (Score:1)
I mean, if this site were CarDot, and this thread were about the hot new Ford Mustang convertible, would anyone take it seriously if I complained that whenever I drive a '79 Pinto it blows up, whereas my old AMC Pacer X Rally Edition was still going strong?
It's actually kind of funny. Too bad s/he posted anonymously...
Re:iPhoto Problem (Score:4, Insightful)