


Microsoft Wants to Project "Cool" Image 568
rocketjam writes "C-Net is reporting that Microsoft is working to get their products placed in popular TV shows like Fox's "24" and HBO's "The Wire" as part of a push from executive Jim Allchin called 'cool form factor'. Like MacDonald's recent hip-makeover marketing efforts, Allchin wants to engender a hip, consumer brand image for the company which is largely perceived as an enterprise software company. Microsoft would like to capture some of the cachet that Apple Computer has among the fashionable and Hollywood tech elite."
Newest 24 (Score:5, Funny)
MI-5 too (spoiler-beware!) (Score:5, Interesting)
Wintel laptops are used as Trojan Horses filled with C4. (no really!)
I've seen a treatment of the final episode of the show, funding is cut and a new manager is brought in who attempts to "modernize" and "standardize" the MI-5 by "upgrading" to Windows boxes.
I will not reveal the ending, but let's just say its not pretty.
The easiest way to spot the villans in 24 is to .. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Newest 24 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Newest 24 (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Newest 24 (Score:5, Insightful)
An Opteron can clock no *higher* than 2GHz, no different than a G5. Architecturally an Opteron is very similar to a G5, more similar to a G5 than a P4, except that the G5 has a more efficient SIMD unit.
An Athlon64 does clock higher than a G5 so on a basic Apples to apples comparison will perform higher... but an Athlon64 also cannot be put into a dual system, and still has a weaker SIMD unit, so it all pans out.
Every system has a merit, and the mere existence of competition drives performance up. Without AMD, Intel would not drive the P4 nearly so hard. Now without Intel+AMD, IBM would not drive the PPC 970 so hard, and vice versa. Everyone has a role to play, and dismissing one of the actors only does your own party a disservice. Competition serves the consumer and customer, not slavish loyalty or fanboyism.
I *welcome* every advance in the PC world because it drives Apple harder to compete. In reflection, if you prefer the AMD, you should similarly welcome every innovation and release from Apple and Intel to drive along AMD, or Apple and AMD to drive along Intel.
Yet.. (Score:5, Funny)
Do not call it "Blue Screen of Death" Anymore! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Yet.. (Score:5, Informative)
Cool can't be manufactured (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Cool can't be manufactured (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Cool can't be manufactured (Score:2)
Re:Cool can't be manufactured (Score:4, Insightful)
I think I agree with the grandparent in this case--cool is manufactured. If you think all the sports people wear Nike because they are a better or cooler shoe, then you are mistaken. Nike is worn by them because Nike gives them shoes, or pays them to wear them. Why else then do entire teams commonly wear the same exact brand of shoe?
Your example with Porsche and Cadillac (BTW, mine is the correct spelling), is even more spurious--Cadillac doesn't TRY to be cool: they aren't in that market. Caddies are meant to be elegant, classy, and sophisticated, not cool. You will further notice that Porsche and Cadillac don't even market to the same people. Nor should they.
All that said, I do agree with the idea that if you see XYZ company running Linux or BSD or MACOSX, then you will tend to like that OS more. Unfortunately, it only works for us nerds, geeks and the nerkles. Jane Doe doesn't get it, and this is something even M$ doesn't seem to understand (although they, of all people, should), because Jane Doe doesn't even realize that the people on the show or in the movie are using a particular type of computer. To her, its just a computer.
Take my wife, as an example. The ONLY reason she knows ANYTHING about linux is because I use it at home--at some of her software doesn't run under linux. If it did, she wouldn't even care as much as she does. To her, as long as the sorry computer is working, it doesn't matter what it looks like.
Most people don't know that they aren't looking at a windows box. Why not? Because to them, it's not about the OS, its about what they can do with the machine. Will their favorite software work? No? Then they take it back. Can they surf the net and drool over pr0n? yes? Then they keep it.
The sad truth is that this won't work for M$ for the same reason that most people don't know much about linux and digital freedom--Americans don't CARE! The irony of it all is that M$ will be able to point to the stable marked and claim that its a result of their advertising, and unless they do some real market research they won't ever know.
("Hi, this is Cindy, and I would like to ask you a few questions about technology on television. Do you have a minute to spare? [this is where most people hang up] Yes? Good. In the most recent episode of Seinfeld what type of computer was he using?" At this point the person starts to break out in a sweat, having forgotten if they watched the show. After a minute they decide they did, but they really can't remember anyone using a computer, so they say the first thing that comes to mind, "I think it was a Dell." This is of course, wrong, as it was probably a Sony Vaio or something similar, but 'Cindy' doesn't care, she marks the little box that says 'windows boxen', and thanks them for their time, but only after asking about 300 other questions that take "only a minute" of their time.)
I imagine that the real strength of linux is that eventually it will allow Dell to put out "Dell Linux", and then you will have "Sony Linux" and "AOLinux" and maybe even "Barbie Linux" (with unrealistic images of women portrayed prominently so that another generation of young females can be ruined by the unrealistic ideal), which would be closely related to "Playboy Linux", and "Hustler Linux", but wouldn't sell quite as well.
See those things will be what wins the OS wars, because M$ will never allow enough control of windows to slip away for that type of branding, but Linux invites it.
No, M$ is doomed to believe they won this "cool campaign", without ever knowing that 90% of the population doesn't CARE!
(Okay, now that I'm done with my soapbox, does any one else want to borrow it?)
Re:Cool can't be manufactured (Score:4, Interesting)
Computers on the other hand are not exactly the sort of thing that people get worried about. You don't have kids going home and crying to his dad because some of the kids in school laughed at him because he didn't have some cool make of computer. (Well, geeks might, but we already know they're not the exact epitomy of coolness).
So, yeah, I'll agree with your outcome, even if I don't necessarily agree with your original statement. Still, we'll get to laugh at the dad thinking he's cool. Like we can do with McDonalds - No really, its more fun to go and dance outside a McDonalds than it is to go to a nightclub, no it is...
Cool can be manufactured 4 segment of the market (Score:2)
It could also be that MS is moving out of the business of pleasing the geek market and now aiming for lower pickings .... for example in parts of Europe Baywatch was the "coolest" show for the longest time ... burnt out bands end up touring Japan ... Madonna and Michael Jackson still dominate headlines in many parts of the world .... and so does Britney ...
Those are probably the parts that MS is trying to influence in its business of world domination. That is what they do every night - try to take over t
Re:Cool can't be manufactured (Score:5, Insightful)
Add to this the fact that Apple produces kick-ass products and you can see why they remain cool. They've demonstrated that they aren't a passing phase.
Microsoft can pay all of the money in the world and still not (and won't) buy that kind of following.
Plus, you don't see Apple pushing the issue with DRM and all of that other bullshit. Once again they are counter (cool) to the mainstream (dud).
Re:Cool can't be manufactured (Score:3, Insightful)
I dunno about a "cool" following, but their money can sure buy a following none the less. How else do you explain their legion of MCSEs?
Makes sense (Score:3, Insightful)
The Next Austin Powers Movie (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The Next Austin Powers Movie (Score:2, Funny)
Is that illegal??? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Is that illegal??? (Score:2)
Huh? Which UK are you living in ? The only place there are such restrictions is on the beeb which is paid for by us taxpayers.
No (Score:3, Informative)
The BBC can't, though [bbc.co.uk]. But the BBC isn't everything.
Microsoft paying for what's free to Apple (Score:5, Insightful)
And as much as I'm a mac lover, it's amazing how LITTLE benefit it's done Apple. What's our market share now?
Re:Microsoft paying for what's free to Apple (Score:5, Insightful)
Take a look at a Mac: the computer case itself and the desktop. Now take a look at your average Windows box.
Any questions?
Re:Microsoft paying for what's free to Apple (Score:5, Funny)
Hewlett Packard, whose marketing department was described as being so inept that, "If they had to sell sushi, they'd describe it as cold, dead, raw fish."
HP is so dull they make Gates and Ballmer look like MTV VJs in comparison.
Re:Microsoft paying for what's free to Apple (Score:4, Funny)
What? Don't tell me you've never seen this video [sdinet.de] of the fearless leader Ballmer? Or perhaps this picture [thesmokinggun.com] of Bill showing off his awesome fashion sense? I don't think you can get much cooler than those guys.
Re:Microsoft paying for what's free to Apple (Score:2)
Seinfeld's computer was a Mac until he struck a deal with Microsoft for the Windows 95 rollout, when it became a Windows PC. I'm not enough of a Seinfeld nut to know which episode featured the new computer for the first time, but if you look at the 95 or 96 season you'll notice the change.
For what it's worth, I think I recall seeing him actually using the system only once or twice.
Re:Microsoft paying for what's free to Apple (Score:3, Interesting)
A: they look good just sitting there. it's a prop, that's all. and the audience can recognigize the "computer" aspect of it as well as the "new glitizy paperweight" without looking like several beige turds stacked on top of each other. Clearly our hero has his act togething since his computer looks so much better then ours
B: They are very re
Re:Care to cite a reference to that ? (Score:3, Informative)
MS in South Park movie (Score:5, Funny)
Fucking Windows 98! Get Bill Gates in here! You told us Windows 98 would be faster, and more efficient, with better access to the Internet!
As Gates tries to defend Windows, the General blows his head off. I thought that was pretty cool.
Simpsons (Score:4, Funny)
Homer: You don't look so rich...
Bill Gates: Don't let the haircut fool you, I am exceedingly wealthy.
Homer: [quietly] Get a load of the bowl-job, Marge!
Bill Gates: Your Internet ad was brought to my attention, but I can't figure out what, if
anything, Compuglobalhypermeganet does, so rather than risk competing with
you, I've decided simply to buy you out.
Homer: I reluctantly accept your proposal!
Bill Gates: Well everyone always does. Buy 'em out, boys!
[Gates' lackeys trash the room.]
Homer: Hey, what the hell's going on!
Bill Gates: Oh, I didn't get rich by writing a lot of checks! [insane laughter]
ah remember us consumers? (Score:2)
Microsoft to project themselves as "cool"? (Score:2)
Sheesh... Good luck with that! My guess is that they won't even top smoking cigarets.
it's more than just publicity (Score:5, Interesting)
It has to look cool, which, IMHO, Microsoft has not grasped yet. A large part of the appeal -- and probably a good reason why the directors of 24 allow it -- of Apple is the cool factor. The hardware is slick, the buttons are shiny, and it doesn't look like most other computers out there.
What product would microsoft have in its arsenal that could fill the above description?
Re:it's more than just publicity (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:it's more than just publicity (Score:2)
Windows and Hardware (Score:2, Insightful)
Apple's cool comes from its superb hardware lineup. Nobody would choose any other laptop given the choice of an Apple powerbook and an equal PC one. The same holds for every other item they produce. The G5s look stunning and are too quiet to tell if they are on.
Everybody who sees an iPod wants one, and they work fine with Windows.
Microsoft con't itself up its credibility by showing Windows, it has to be in a cool computer, they need to team up with a Hardware manu
I can see it now... (Score:5, Funny)
Neo: "Trinity, you hack in, I'll keep Agent Smith busy. How much time you need?"
(Wack! Wack! Pow!)
Trinity: (Looks at Micro$oft Windoze(TM) login prompt) "We're in."
Fab Five to the rescue! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Fab Five to the rescue! (Score:3, Funny)
Heh. (Score:2, Insightful)
Upload a virus to an alien spaceship!!! (Score:2)
Since when (Score:5, Interesting)
Sadly, MS will always win out by ripping off a smaller company's ideas and making knock-offs. I don't know why they wouldn't be happy with that. Let the other guy take the risk, and if it works - steal the idea! Let the other guy be cool, then emulate him. It's been working quite well for them, so who cares?
Re:Since when (Score:5, Insightful)
Take a look at anything that was cool in the past 20 years and either it is or it eventually had a big corporation behind it.
Look at any popular music group/singer. Big corp behind them.
Look at Nike/Adidas.
Look at any hip/cool tv show or movie.
Lots of sports teams or events have big corporations behind it.
Can M$ buy cool? Yes and its been done many times before.
Re:Since when (Score:3, Insightful)
But "appearness of coolness" = "actual coolness" to the general public and thats all that really matters.
Does Apple have the "appearness of coolness" or are they "actualy cool"? What is the EXACT determining factor? Is it a subjective factor?
If you don't think something is "actually cool" are you right or are you wrong? How would you know?
Re:Since when (Score:3, Interesting)
Coke. Pepsi. A multitude of alcohol and tobacco companies. RIAA member companies. In the /. crowd, IBM to some respect.
I agree with your main point, though the cardinal rule for marketing is "Whatever we aren't make people think we are". This is largely effective -- so much so that I automatically think the opposite when seeing an advertisement just to get some idea of what the facts might be.
Coke and Pepsi are carbonated beverages with flavoring
Oh really? (Score:5, Interesting)
From the article: After some early success with shows like "24" last season...
Maybe last season but in the first series: 24's Good Guys Do Use Macs [wired.com]
While Bauer and most of the other agents in his unit used Macs, the traitor used a laptop made by Dell. The baddies, a group of renegade Serbs, also use Dell machines.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
MS needs product placement on The Soprano's (Score:4, Funny)
Clippy (Score:2, Funny)
"Just open a socket", growled Bauer.
Microsoft? Cool? (Score:2)
I was half expecting the foot icon on the topic. Microsoft is the anti-cool. Mention "Micro$oft" and the first image I get is a bunch of clueless PHB's bowing down to Bill Gates, and MCSE's looking for the "Start" button on VCR's. Remember how cool it was to watch Trinity hack using a *nix console in Matrix Reloaded? Imagine the same scene with her pushing colorful candyland buttons in Windows XP. Bah.
Huh? (Score:2)
Win ME Video (Score:5, Insightful)
This reminds me of the "Windows ME Introduction Video" that showed several extremely happy people using "digital media" technology, "recovering from problems easily" (kid with hammer attacks keyboard), and experiencing the power of "home networking." I really love the part where Dad shoots a video of the wife and kid and sends it spinning around an animated globe to Grandma's computer. And despite all the marketing hype, all the non-geeks I know who have used WinME universally agree that it sucks.
Besides, most of the people I know who are clueless about computers hate computers, and nothing will ever change that. Not marketing, and not attempts at making software easier to use. And such people wouldn't even notice the latest toy from HP on their favorite TV show.
Re:Win ME Video (Score:2)
...what was the problem (aside from the obvious) with Windows ME anyway? I'm certainly not a Windows person, but from what I've seen of it, it didn't appear any worse than 95 or 98 (being worse than either of those would have been quite an achievement). Yet it seems to receive more than its fair share of complaints...
Re:Win ME Video (Score:2)
Not to mention the opinion of any geek who was unfortunate enough to use one... but I don't think I can write the full and uncensored opinion of that in a public forum.
Kjella
M$ on TV. (Score:4, Interesting)
The solution is oh so simple... (Score:5, Funny)
This program has performed an illegal operation and has been shut down. Do you wish to generate an error report and send it to Microsoft?
to
Hey dude, Bill reckons you've been working so hard in Word that you deserve a break so we've closed it down for you. Go grab a diet soda (we've gotta watch that sugar rush!) or chill out by the water cooler for a while and then return refreshed to start all over again. We're so glad you've chosen to take a break we've even emailed Bill and told him you're not skipping on your personal time.
Re:The solution is oh so simple... (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, man. I just got flashes of a paperclip with an eyebrow ring and a goatee.
The Sopranos - worst computer placements (Score:2)
First, the monitor in Toni's office has only one cable (the VGA one) but no power cable attached.
In season 3, I think, Toni's sister is chatting using a Powerbook (I think. It was black with a glowing apple logo). But when the screen is shown she is using ICQ or MSN on a windows box.. the widgets are just too different... I nearly screamed. (Oh wait, I did.)
Yet, The Sopranos is one of the best TV series I've ever
Hollywood has always had zero clue about computers (Score:2)
Re:The Sopranos - worst computer placements (Score:2)
I hear that Joe Camel is looking for another job (Score:2)
Hmmm,
HOW??? (Score:5, Insightful)
What's Microsoft going to do? Ask them to show people booting up their PC so that the Windows logo takes over the screen and that musical sound plays?
Have cool twenty-somethings joke about how to get rid of that obnoxious Clippy?
This is just a dumb upper-management idea. Microsoft doesn't make the kind of products for which product placement works.
Furthermore, Apple's appeal to a certain group is directly connected to their willingness to make strong, emphatic design statements. You may hate the way a Mac looks or you may love it, but you can't be indifferent to it. Other PC makers may take tentative steps in making their boxes charcoal instead of beige, or making the front plastic bulge a bit instead of being perfectly flat, but they're not willing to be emphatic--and neither is Microsoft.
Contrast the Apple "switcher" ads--which I personally hated--with the bland, characterless attempt Microsoft made to do the same thing. You knew the Apple switchers were real people. And it came as no surprise to find that the Microsoft "switchers" were stock photographs.
Re:HOW??? (Score:3, Insightful)
It's easy to forget that MS makes hardware. Keyboards, mice, *cough* *cough* tablet PC's. It wouldn't surprise me to see this is the route they go down.
I've owned MS products for a few years now and am proud to say that my mouse and keyboard haven't crashed once or been hacked. More than I can say for their software though....
What the fsck is wrong with you people? (Score:4, Funny)
sigh... (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, Longhorn will be renamed "Windows Extreme"
Well, good frigging luck... (Score:2, Insightful)
to Microsoft on this. Their problem is that, in 99% of the times, a windows box looks like ass, and TV/Movies are all about visuals. Apple has got them beat, beat, beat. It would need shots of the desktop, and, unless somebody in the movie is USING the computer, that won't be easy...
Sorry Billy-boy, but you must get a cool box first before somebody thinks MS is cool.
I pity da foo'. (Score:2, Insightful)
BSOD improvement (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Bill Gates (Score:2)
With Apple, Jobs has always tried to be cool. From the early stages, Jobs wanted his products to look cool. Jobs actually likes making things look cool for the sake of looking cool, how can Microsoft compete with that?
Maybe they should look at their TV advertising... (Score:5, Interesting)
The setup is that a besuited guy wanders in on a what is presumably the IT department. The IT department looks like the commercial director has taken the most boring people on the talent agency's books and told the costume and make up people "think bland". They are all dancing extremely awkwardly and drinking some unidentified liquid (the way these people are acting, it sure ain't alcohol) out of blue plastic cups.
The guy asks what's the party, at which point the head IT guy explains how they had magically consolidated the Active Directory groups from 70 to 4 thus allowing them to roll out new apps to the sales force in minutes (or some such hooey). The suit looks nonplussed, until Head IT Guy explains that this will save the company millions of dollars. The ad closes with the suit leading the IT department in a line dance, which they manage to make look just as awkward and dorky.
I realise the ad probably has to be designed to it can be shown everywhere from Salt Lake City to Singapore, but, jeez, if you want to make your brand cool try not to associate it with complete dorks... :)
Bingo (Score:5, Insightful)
You've hit the nail on the head. MS wants to be every image at some point or another. Big Reliable Bank Partner. No wait... SupaDope Xbox playa. No wait... Your Friendly Neighbourhood PC weenie. No wait....
They can't have it all ways. As someone pointed out above, while Microsoft can rent cool, they can never, ever be cool. Its just not the way it works.
Like trying to pick your own nickname. Apple became cool years ago and that's what they are still. MS, much more powerful financially, cannot claim underdog status, and no one in their right mind can associate themselves with a global behemoth like that.
Microsoft cool?! (Score:2)
Monacle and persian cat (Score:2)
Fighting the symptoms (Score:5, Insightful)
No. Brute force and ignorance, every time. "We want a cool image; find out how much that'll cost, and buy it."
Unfortunately, so far, it's a policy that's mostly worked. And if they spend enough in the right places, I fear it'll work again. What does that say about society?
IBM tried to be cool. (Score:5, Funny)
IBM wanted people to think OS/2 was "cool", so the company began calling it "Warp", which to the people at the time who were likely to be old enough and powerful enough to make big purchases meant "bend out of shape in such a way as to possibly render useless".
Well, I'm here to report that it worked. IBM did in fact succeed in associating the word "cool" with OS/2. IBM lost a "cool" billion dollars on OS/2. In the years immediately following, IBM lost another "cool" billion dollars. That's positively frigid.
OS/2 is still "cool" in the sense that, because it is dead, it is no longer warm.
So, that's a story about a big company trying to be cool.
Cool? (Score:2)
Tho if they did, it would make Jeff Goldblum's job a lot easier.
C.S.I. product placements (Score:2)
Aaaah, grasshoppah, you forget one thing. (Score:3, Interesting)
I personally thought back to my first use of OS X, and "cool" was amongst the first thought.
"Right On" and "Fucking-A" soon followed.
My first use of Windows XP followed a similar vein, only the complete opposite; "Oh...MY...GOD", "What the FUCK!!", "Make it STOP!!", "For the love of GOD MAKE IT STOP", "What fucking rocket scientist thought this was a good idea?", "Why am I having childhood flashbacks of Romper Room?"
Here's a clue for Microsoft:
Make it simple: Turn the crap OFF/un-integrate.
Make it look good: See above (XP looks HORRIBLE)
Make it secure: Turn the crap off by default.
Make it functional: see all of the above.
Oh, and *LISTEN* to what people want. Not like windows 98 beta when 78% of people said "NO!" to integrating Internet Explorer into the OS.
(sheesh)
Money would be better spent on .... (Score:3, Insightful)
From the horse's mouth (Score:3, Informative)
The article is kind of dated, but the fundamentals still hold true today.
Why not do something even better? (Score:3, Insightful)
In short: Isn't improving the actual product(s) more important than seeing some cookie-cutter TV star using them?
They can put all the TV spin they want on their OS's and apps. It won't do them one iota of good if said OS and apps remain in their current state, security-wise (which means they're about as secure as a block of Swiss cheese).
hate the new mcd (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah, but I really despise the new McDonald's 'hip' commercials! If Microsoft wants to do the same thing, I'll probably wind up hating...
oh wait, nevermind
Re:About time... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's just trying to get the street cred it craves.
It's important to make sure it doesn't get it. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to make sure it doesn't. This message will self-destruct in 15 months.
Re:About time... (Score:5, Insightful)
Thankfully, Microsoft's success in having become 'the establishment' will make it very hard for them to acquire street cred. That sort of perception tends to attach to rebels, free-thinkers and high performers, not monolithic institutions. While it's true that MS itself has shown breathtaking contempt for the law, using their software is not going to make you a rebel without a cause; it's going to make you a sheep without an alternative.
Re:About time... (Score:3, Interesting)
Do you drink cola or soda/pop, and if you do what national or multi-national marketing effort does it have?
Would you feel OK holding on to a can of RC Cola? How about a Vernors? Celray? [slashdot.org]
Where did that 'street cred' come from anyway?
Re:Whatever... (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously though, Apple already has the "cool" image MS wants to take. They are in most of the movies and look how much marketshare it got them? The only possible explanation for this is that someone up top is going though a midlife crisis or soemthing.
Re:About time... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:About time... (Score:5, Insightful)
You're slightly wrong here. They have the perfectionist drive in spades. It's just that they are trying to perfect making money, not perfect making product.
Re:About time... (Score:2)
Re:About time... (Score:5, Insightful)
I can't beleive you're saying Office and Windows, with their 80% profit margin, are sold "cheap".
Re:About time... (Score:3, Interesting)
Compared to the price of a product in which all of the bugs were fixed - yes I am saying it's cheap.
There is a general rule, which applies particularly to software development that 80% of the value takes 20% of the effort. That last 20% of the value costs the remaining 80%. It's the 80:20 rule. Microsoft are masters of this rule. Many failed companies failed because they didn't take this rule into account. Edward
Re:About time... (Score:4, Insightful)
If MS decides to increase their budget for a particular application, it will be to add features. Features tend to add even more bugs (and bloat), but they are great for marketing and hence sales. Features directly add value. Bugfixes do not. People (naively) expect their software to work as advertised. Customers don't want to have to pay extra for the company to fix something that was never supposed to have been broken.
Commercial customers with tech-savvy sys-admins can be a problem here. This is the only reason that MS ever developed the NT series of OSes. At least there MS paid at least some attention to reliability and bugfixes. But the point is that it was only because they felt they had no choice. Below a certain level of reliability Linux/Unix would just be too tempting an alternative for this market segment.
I realize that many
Re:About time... (Score:3, Interesting)
You see, most hardware
Re:About time... (Score:3, Insightful)
What do you think the RIAA is doing? They mass market music on MTV and such to make it desirable, then they sell CD's at inflated prices at such a level that only those of a certain economic level with the disposable can buy them, maintaining exclusivity and thus ensuring "coolness".
Marketing: The end-result of 50 years of Psychoanalytical research + Greed.
Re:About time... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:About time... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Apple's branding success (Score:3, Interesting)