Project Gutenberg Publishes 10,000th Free eBook 281
AndrewRUK writes "Earlier today, Project Gutenberg's founder, Micheal Hart, announced that the project has passed the milestone of 10,000 free eBooks available, with the publication of the Magna Carta.Project Gutenberg was founded in 1971, with the aim of "[making] information, books and other materials available to the general public in forms a vast majority of the computers, programs and people can easily read, use, quote, and search." In the 32 years since the project started, over 10,000 books, ranging from the Bible to school textbooks, and from the complete works of Shakespeare to the USA's declaration of independence, have been made freely available to the public by Project Gutenberg."
I guess.. (Score:4, Insightful)
I still kind of have issues with ebooks.. I mean, reading is pretty much a tactile thing for me.. I.e. I like the smell of books, I like turning pages..
In other words, it is nice to get away from the computer sometimes and just read..
Though, I congratulate their efforts, it is cool
Re:I guess.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I guess.. (Score:2)
`shred ~/ebooks/*`
Re:I guess.. (Score:2)
Been done (Score:2)
Although, since I haven't heard much of it in a while, I'm assuming they either ran o
Personal preference (Score:2)
Yes, but sometimes it's nice to have an electronic document to read off of your computer screen so when someone walks past your desk during business hours, you can tell them you're "researching for an upcoming project" while you're actually reading about nanotechnology [foresight.org] or something else that interests you.
Personally, I applaud the efforts of this project. Once products like ePaper begin to be mass-produced and available to the
eInk (Score:2)
Coming soon... (Score:2)
(...ducks...)
Better get a patent on it while it's
Re:I guess.. (Score:2)
God, printing 10k ebooks?
Re:I guess.. (Score:2)
Just do what I do, get into work early and use the company's paper and toner.
Re:I guess.. (Score:2)
You've obviously never built a PC in a cheap Taiwanese case, then. Sharp metal edges can be even more exquisitely painful than paper.
e-reader hardware? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:e-reader hardware? (Score:2)
Jason
ProfQuotes [profquotes.com]
Re:e-reader hardware? (Score:5, Interesting)
How much text can you stuff in 8Mb?
2 full copies of the bible..
or
all of shakespeare
or
LOTS and lots of good fiction.
-Jazz
Re:e-reader hardware? (Score:2)
Re:e-reader hardware? (Score:2, Interesting)
I've read a fair number of texts on my Newton, but found a Palm Pilot too small.
I've read a lot more, and enjoy it more on my pen computers---started with an NCR-3125, moved up to a Fujitsu Point, just got a Stylistic.
Apparently the Zinio Reader for Tablet PC is well done, haven't tried it yet.
William
uBook (Score:3, Informative)
It's the only eBook reader I use. Slightly confusing itterface to get used to, but very clean and simple. Reads many unencrypted text formats including ( pdb, prc, txt, rtf, html ) and can read into .zip archives and display covers/inline images.
Runs on windows and the pocketPC platform and is FREEWARE.
uBook download [gowerpoint.com]
Re:e-reader hardware? (Score:2)
Homepage: http://members.iinet.net.au/~simonh/spacejock/ind
Download link:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~simonh/Progra
It is only for Windows though.
Re:Gutenberg books are plain ASCII text. (Score:2)
Anyhow, there are other sites that are devoted to takeing PG books and converting into PDF and then letting people download them. I've been there before, but am too lazy to go look it up. It's linked somewhere on the PG site.
Re:Gutenberg books are plain ASCII text. (Score:2)
Take a look at my version of Okakura Kakuzo's _The Book of Tea_ in my portfolio, http://members.aol.com/willadams/portfolio.html
William
Re:Forget Palmdoc try Ztxt format in Weasel Reader (Score:2)
Proofreading (Score:5, Informative)
If you're in the mood for browsing books, give it a try... you can find something interesting to read and do a little service for humanity at the same time.
Re:Proofreading (Score:2)
I think of myself as a pretty good proof reader. However, in one of the children's books that I've been reading to my son, I continued finding new minor glitches even after five readings.
If software has a bug per thousand lines, despite the code being chec
10,000 books? (Score:2, Funny)
Can't be said enough... (Score:2, Redundant)
Congratulations! (Score:2, Redundant)
Go to Distributed Proofreaders [pgdp.net] if you'd like to help out!
Re:Congratulations! (Score:2)
Legal? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
It's a great literary work, but 1.) I (and I imagine most people) find 400 year old English very obtuse and hard to read. 2.) Modern translators have gone back to the original Hebrew and Greek, whereas the KJV was translated from the Vulgate.
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Any translation newer than 1922 is copyrighted (in the US). But there's a number of translations available; PG has the Douay-Rheims translation, and the World English Bible (a modern translation) for its English editions. (The World English Bible is still under copyright, but we have the right to use it.) (We could also do the American Standard Edition, but I've never se
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
I've got the American Standard Version at my site [goreadthebible.com]. However, I recently learned that the majority of online Bible sites have a humongous number of errors in their ASV (we are all using the same etext). I recently found the SWORD project [crosswire.org], which appears to have a good ASV etext; I intend to extract it and put it on my site, soon.
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
No, to translate the Bible one need only have a good working knowledge of Greek: the Septuagint, miraculously translated identically by 72 Jewish sch
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Given that God has been dead for well over 70 years, it's no surprise that the Bible is now in the public domain.
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Rus
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Nathan
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
The King James Version was ordered into creation by King James I of England, and would have never been copyrighted. James was interested in displacing the Genevan Translation, not making a few shillings selling bibles. If he wanted money, he could just raise a tax, after all.
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
If Shakespeare, Ibsen and Milton could do without them, so can we.
Even if Shakespeare himself didn't benefit from copyrights (most of his plays weren't published until after his death, anyway), his publishers claimed eternal copyright over Shakespeare's text. Ibsen didn't do without them; by the 19th century, copyrights were a
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
In other developments...
Re:Legal? (Score:2)
Still (Score:2)
Re:Still (Score:2)
Re:Still (Score:2)
Re:Still (Score:2)
Project Gutenberg? (Score:2)
It is a library. (Score:2)
It is also a project in that it seeks people to transcribe and proof the texts into acceptable electronic versions.
Re:It is a library. (Score:2)
Slashdotted (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted (Score:2)
$1 Trillion? (Score:2)
Jason
ProfQuotes [profquotes.com]
Re:$1 Trillion? (Score:3, Informative)
Not quite. They estimated that if they charged $1 per book, they would have given away $1 Trillion worth of ebooks, not raised that amount. There's a big difference.
For all the noise... (Score:2)
Re:For all the noise... (Score:2)
Yes, it's limited to things specifically released or out of copyright. But there's an awful lot there. I've used it so I could do full-text searches on various classes for things, I've read a number of books from it (Tom Swift, mostly, because I only have one hardcover going back that far).
Re:For all the noise... (Score:3, Interesting)
I wouldn't say "regularly", but I would say "once in a while". Is that good enough?
What did you read?
Shakespeare, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Lewis Caroll, early P. G. Wodehouse, early Edgar Rice Burroughs.
Re:For all the noise... (Score:2)
But to address your question even more directly, my 78 yr old father recently "discovered" Project Gutenberg & has enjoyed it a lot. In fact, he announced this to me as if it should be a great revelation & I just had to grin :-D
Re:For all the noise... (Score:2)
Re:For all the noise... (Score:2)
Re:For all the noise... (Score:3, Interesting)
At least some of us read some of that older material. Shakespeare and Poe and Twain didn't suddenly become pointless after you left school.
Personally I've found myself reading a number of pulp mysterys - The Orange-Yellow Diamond by J.S. Fletcher (some sterotypes, but not racist), Joe Muller: Detective by Grac
Re:For all the noise... (Score:2, Interesting)
Jules Verne, Mark Twain, HG Wells, Herotodus, Lincoln, Gibbon, Napolean, Stoker, Wilde, Poe, Lovecraft, London, Dickens, Plutach,
Shackleton (Score:2)
The only thing I read from Project Gutenburg was Earnest Shackleton's "South" the remarkable story of his expedition to Antarctica that set off in 1914 just the first world war was breaking out. I read it after having seen Channel 4's dramatisation with Kenneth Brannagh [amazon.co.uk].
The expedition went pear shaped but all of the men survived for two years in the Antarctic Circle - camped out on floating pieces of ice, eating penguins and seals, travelling 900 miles across the most inhospitable sea on the planet in an
YOU CAN HELP!!! (Score:2)
Go to Distributed Proofreaders [pgdp.net] to help out! The are a distributed effort to scan, OCR, proof, and post books to Project Gutenberg.
If a man dies owing money to Jews (Score:2)
What a different, horrible world! This passage reminded me that in this time the largest corporation in Europe, the Roman Church, was desperately afraid of economic activity that they f
Re:If a man dies owing money to Jews (Score:2)
And the reason Christians weren't allowed to lend for interest had nothing to do with fear of economic activity, and plenty to do with le
Morality Reflects Power (Score:2)
Morality derives from the State, and yet also from the people, as a way of reproducing and constraining power relations. That's why "acceptable" morals were transformed during the century-long conversion of the Roman Empire from Pag
Yes yes yes I *know* about the history (Score:2)
Re:Yes yes yes I *know* about the history (Score:2)
Because Jesus prohibited it. Doesn't matter how logical it might seem, if God comes down from on high and specificly preaches against it, you assume your logic is wrong and follow along. At least if you are a beliver (or as some would say: pretending to be a beliver).
Story submission backlog (Score:2)
1215-10-15 dawneth Magna Carta Published (yro, news) (accepted)
CmdrTaco must be pleased to get this one out of the queue.
Just Imagine! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Last time I checked... (Score:2)
Of course I'll now get the expected slew of people telling me that the formatting can all be reconstructed. It cannot. There is no unambiguous way to recover reasonable formatting of these texts to be viewed in any other format oth
Re:Last time I checked... (Score:2)
You should use Plucker books [pluckerbooks.com] on your Palm. Only 2000 books so far, but no random line breaks (apart from those enforced by 160 pixel screen). And a new version (1.6) of Plucker [plkr.org] is just out.
Re:Last time I checked... (Score:2)
To start with: what type of markup do you think we should have used? The 1971 start of PG predates TeX, XML or Troff. Even 1990, in some ways a more accurate start date, predates HTML and XML. Do you honestly think that forcing all
Re:Last time I checked... (Score:2)
Come on. You know you just tossed that out without actually reading any history yourself gambling it was on your side. Well it's not.
Many markup languages existed in 1971: troff predecessors runoff, roff, rf; SGML predecessor GML (I remember actually learning that one at IBM years ago). Book publishers had been talking about structure information in manuscripts for years before Project Gutenberg started. And just a
Re:Last time I checked... (Score:2)
Oh cool, let's take our limited volunteer labor and force them to learn some off the wall markup language that they will never use anywhere else.
just about any computer [...] would have been capable of running a simple viewer for such languages
Oh cool, let's take our audience and get rid of anyone not willing to run a viewer they only need for our books. Provided, of course, there is a viewer for their syst
Books warez... (Score:2)
Re:Books warez... (Score:3, Funny)
No. The copyright holder didn't recieve any compensation from you downloading the electronic transcription of their work. A library book is paid for once at the very least when it is obtained by the library.
Break out the eye patch buddy.. YARR!
Re:Books warez... (Score:2)
World of your own, son.
TWW
Re:Books warez... (Score:2)
Which explains why the RIAA is so upset about their skanks ho "singers" having their music on the Internet.
Re:Books warez... (Score:2)
My local bookstore's kneehigh in paperback editions of LOTR.
Re:Books warez... (Score:2)
Now that all these books are available... (Score:2)
Re:Now that all these books are available... (Score:2)
I've always wanted to get together a group to record these great works under some kind of GPL or BSD like license, but never had the time^X^X^X^X energy to make it happen.
The text to speach software out there is OX for reading the news to the blind, but sounds pretty much the same as the old "Speak and Spell" from the 80's. It's a crime against the visually impared.
That said, you can get books on tape and CD from the library and audible.com offers audio books for
-1, Redundant (Score:2)
Re:-1, Redundant (Score:2)
The original story was remiss in not mentioning DP. I posted my comment within about 30 seconds of seeing the article - obviously there were a LOT of us with the same issue.
Michael Hart is a true visionary (Score:2)
It is a strikingly original project. And it has some quasi-political overton
Project Gutenberg Australia has more recent works (Score:2)
Keep in mind that if you don't reside in Australia you would be committing copyright infringement if you were to download anything from that site that is still under copyright in your country of residence.
Go to their site to see what they have, or use th
Re:errata (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? (Score:2)
They'll just jump into the foreign books.
Also, there are a lot of post 1922 books that were not copyright renewed, but they are a bit harder to clear.
Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? (Score:2)
For one thing, we don't just do literary works. We haven't even scratched the surface on mathematical and scientific works. As for magazines, we're just starting on Punch and a few other well-known ones. We also haven't started on the books that weren't renewed, and I'd like to think that we'll reverse the last copyright extension in some way or
Re:"Literary" (Score:2)
Yes, to some of those. We have some transcribed musical texts, (and one top forty song), and some of us have started working on early movies; so far PG only has a few short, low-res Government clips.
I thought PG etexts were plain ASCII text.
Common misconception. PG usually keeps an ASCII edition where feasable, but that doesn'
World Domination through Literature (Score:2)
Re:Sol 8/9 and Sun ONE Directory 5.2 Headaches (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The Black Book of Communism (Score:2)
Kinda how you wouldn't expect to find a copy of The Communist Manifesto on Rush Limbaugh's website -- or Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, for that matter. Both are books that don't fall into Rush Limbaughs sphere of interest.
Centralized communism didn't turn out the way that Marx envisioned; that doesn't make some of the social criticism or observations from the left any less valid. Most of the advances in labor laws that
Re:Encouraging and clarifying "pubic domain" (Score:2)
Nope. Some company sued Corel over including pictures it had made of famous paintings in their image collections. The court ruled that making a copy of an existing work doesn't give a new copyright, no matter how hard it is. In the US, at least, creative effort is required for a new copyright.
Re:Is there *any* editorial oversight? (Score:2)
Re:Is there *any* editorial oversight? (Score:2)
We're a library; our job is not to pretty up the past, it's to record. We noted on our copy that it was propoganda, and left it at that. If you are interested in the history of anti-Catholism in the US, that is an important work to read.
Why not just include ""The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"[4] as well?
Because we haven't found a clearable copy yet? T
Re:plain ASCII makes no sense (Score:2)
That's absurd. Of course, there are disadvantages to XML:
Everyone can write plain text; there are very few people who know enough to write XML long-hand. XML is in discussion in Distributed Proofreaders, and we got several answers amounting to "Whatever. You have totally confused me. So long as I don't have to touch it, I don't care.".
Not everyone has the programs to transform XML into something usable. The DTD's haven't been created, and even where they have been, t
I like the idea. (Score:2)