Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media

The Psychology Behind Headphones 395

pvt_medic writes "The BBC has an interesting article today about portable music players and personal space. The article is on the research that Dr Michael Bull has done on portable music players. He analyzes them as a "tool whereby users manage space, time and the boundaries around the self." This article goes on to analyze the social and psychological aspects related to listening to music in public with headphones. A good quick read for those who do this."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Psychology Behind Headphones

Comments Filter:
  • by garcia ( 6573 ) * on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:41AM (#8498448)
    Some women use earphones to deflect unwanted attention, finding it easier to avoid responding because they look already occupied.

    People in general do this. I work at a technical college and see numerous students with headphones on (I don't believe I have seen earbuds recently). I see absolutely no reason for people to be listening to music while in any sort of educational institution. I would guess that would be the equivalent of someone's body languge -- showing crossed arms during a conversation.

    I think that people are shy enough as it is. We do very little REAL social interaction as it is. Do we really want to become even more anti-social creatures by promoting music as some sort of "shield" from the outside world? Remember, the average person spends about 50% of their daily free time at home watching TV.

    Music is something I like to enjoy with others at concerts and at home. Music is something that should be passed on to others. Nothing like finding a new genre of music you have never heard before because a friend had it playing in the car or in his house.

    Just my worthless ramblings,
    • by elykyllek ( 543092 ) * on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:47AM (#8498531) Homepage
      Unfortunately a lot of the music other people listen to sucks. I'm glad they wear their headphones, it doesn't shield them, it sheilds me.
      • by Thud457 ( 234763 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:52AM (#8498602) Homepage Journal
        would be an analysis of how ivory-tower eggheads over-analyze ever goddamned little thing in a futile attempt to make themselves seem relevant and get one paper closer to that all-important tenure.
        • by Anonymous Coward
          While some people might consider this a garbage study, he does bring forth lots of interesting points.

          For example, there was an earlier article in Wired where Dr. Bull did a small Q&A [wired.com] and something in particular stood out:

          lot of people use it to go to work, for commuting. I found that they use the same music on a regular basis. They will often play the same half-dozen tunes for three months, and each part of the journey has its own tune... It gives them control of the journey, the timing of the journ

          • by sjb2016 ( 514986 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:34AM (#8499072)
            That's interesting. I know that when I lived in Sweden and walked to the bus stop about a mile or so from my house, each song would start in a given space of 10 or 20 feet each time (if I started the tape from the beginning when I left my house). I had 15 tapes I listened to regularly and by the time my year was up, I knew almost exactly when each song would be playing on the walk. In fact, every time I hear Everclear's "Daughter of Mine" I think of a sharp turn in the path because that song always played then.

            As far as the grandparent goes, this study may not be of great use for your average Joe, but there is something to be said for pure research on a topic that interests you. Academia should not be about strictly practical things. While I make no promises, I bet some of the most important leaps forward in tech were discovered because a researcher was trying to do something unrelated but happened across something brilliant.
        • Ha. But it's not just ivory tower eggheads who've noticed this. Check out the following pair of songs on the subject:

          "In my headphones," Axis II by the Paranoid Social Club [pscmusic.com] (also available in a live set on etree.org).

          "Walkman music," Always Will be by J-Live [j-livemusic.com].

          Incidentally, I fit this profile to a T. I won't even go to the local mall without my ipod to assuade my agoraphobia. Listening to a walkman stops solicitors and panhandlers from bothering you as well. Shit, I have a pair of Sennheiser DJ phones that cancel about 32 dB of noise, and I sometimes wear them at work with no sound playing on them at all, just to help keep me concentrated.

          In short, by supressing one of my senses I also supress some of my natural uneasiness in uncertain social situations and that's helped make me more confident overall.
          • Quoth the parent:

            [i]In short, by supressing one of my senses I also supress some of my natural uneasiness in uncertain social situations and that's helped make me more confident overall.[/i]

            I can't do that. I, too, have a bit of discomfort in social situations, specifically when out in the general public.

            I find that having headphones on decreases my situational awareness. I grew up in a shitty neighborhood where people sometimes wanted to kick the crap out of me. On one occassion, I got my ass beat b
        • I think you're transforming your desires for an iPod into anger and frustration directed at those people who do own an iPod.
      • by ichimunki ( 194887 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:56AM (#8498638)
        I don't know about that. Up until last week, when the bus drivers here went on strike, I found I listened to more of "other people's" music as a result of walkman radios being played too loudly on the bus than all other sources of "external" music combined.

        For myself I realized that wearing headphones was not a good idea since the tendency was to drown out external stimuli.

        Anyway... was it just me or did this "article" read more like an ad for iPod than anything else?
    • by WormholeFiend ( 674934 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:48AM (#8498552)
      I prefer being ignored by someone with headphones on than by someone putting their index fingers in their ears and yelling "I CANT HEAR YOU LALALALALALALAAAA".
    • by imAck ( 102644 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:50AM (#8498565) Homepage
      On the contrary, I have spent many hours in group settings working on software projects at an educational institution. For one, I just write better code when I have some music to provide a rhythm to code to. For another, it's helpful to have a way to be isolated when working on a very difficult problem, but be able to return to the group setting as easily as taking off my headphones. I _do_ agree that as a culture we have become physically isolationists, but people have been using newspapers on subway commutes since the 1800's as a "shield" in much the same way. This is not a brand new social apparatus; Just a new instantiation of it.

      • by angle_slam ( 623817 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:06AM (#8498748)
        According to some ADHD experts, the rhythm of the music allows ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) to concentrate better, instead of being distracted by random conversations, etc. I know that I can't work without music on.
        • by Chewie ( 24912 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:15AM (#8498852)
          Wow, I'm glad to find that it's not just me. I have ADHD (non-medicated), but it's absolutely impossible for me to get any work done without listening to music. Headphones are great at work because even in an open cube, I can find some isolation without bothering people around me.
          • Regarding your .sig:

            53 6f 20 64 6f 20 49 2c 20 62 75 74 20 79 6f 75 20 64 6f 6e 27 74 20 73 65 65 20 6d 65 20 63 6f 6d 70 6c 61 69 6e 67 20 61 62 6f 75 74 20 69 74 2c 20 64 6f 20 79 6f 75 3f 20 3a 2d 29
        • by Bigbutt ( 65939 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:18AM (#8498884) Homepage Journal
          As someone with ADHD I can agree. I'm surrounded by cube dwellers working on similar problems (network group). I keep a music player running all the time, sometimes low, sometimes louder so I can maintain concentration on what I'm doing.

          I work better if I'm at home dialed in, but I also lose the interactivity that's sometimes necessary.

          I've asked to see if I can telecommute full time. We'll see how that goes.
        • Aye.

          Nothing is better than a good playlist to get lots of desk work done. Be that coding, writing, data entry, or grinding out AA points in EverQuest.

          Music just gets me "in the zone" so I can focus on the task at hand while at the same time giving coworkers and spouses a visual cue to not interrupt you.

          More than half of the documentation I've done for my company is a result of a few good playlists.
      • by Anonymous Coward
        I can't possibly listen to music while writing code. You see, I'm a bass player too (the instrument, not the fish) and I wind up listening to bass parts and drum parts instead of thinking algorithms, functions and syntax. My coworkers get pissed, but I have this curse...
      • Here at work...everyone AROUND me uses headphones...because...I DON'T....hahaha.

        :-P

    • I agree. Reading some things in the article, I got a very peculiar image.

      They let listeners become witnesses without the risk of getting too involved. The earphones absolve them of some responsibility.

      Is the author implying that we dampen reality through the use of mp3 players?

      Life is dynamic, exciting, uncertain. That's what makes it worth living.

      To me, this article is saying that we should use these mp3 players to exert a sort of control over our everyday experiences, altering them to conform
      • Before in the article, he has said this:

        '"They construct their moods, they re-make the time of their day," says Dr Bull., "It's a much more active process even though it's dependent on the machinery."

        Choice is the key factor, he says. By choosing the music, you reclaim some of the world - it's no longer dominated by messages pointed at you.'

        I don't think he means that we should use mp3 players to leave the outside world out, but rather take more control of the outside world.

    • by niko9 ( 315647 ) * on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:53AM (#8498604)
      Remember, the average person spends about 50% of their daily free time at home watching TV.

      I DON'T WATCH TV!

      I, um, spend my time here... and listening to songs thats have gratuitous amounts of cowbell.
    • by cap'n foolsy ( 635911 ) <demonstar311@y a h oo.com> on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:54AM (#8498619)
      one of my own reasons for listening to music while in school is that it helps relax me and open my mind to whatever i'm studying at the time. nothing like bach, vivaldi, or some john williams to help you absorb vector calculus.

      unless of course the students you're talking about are wearing headphones while in class, which is an entirely different matter. music in your own free time is perfectly healthy diversion.
    • I had a friend who had a really old car and the radio and tape player didn't work in it, so he wore headphones while driving....really safe right? lol.
      • Unless he is using modern headphones which seal off the ear from everything but the music, it probably doesn't make that much of a difference compared to those morons whose car speakers are always run loud enough to entertain a whole traffic jam.
    • by DougMackensie ( 79440 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:57AM (#8498651)
      And since when is anti-social behavior immediately seen as a negative thing. Is it a bad thing that Henry David Thoreau (walden) worked best when he removed himself from society? Is it a bad thing when Andrew Wiles (fermat solver) would hole himself up in his attic by himself to concentrate on his proof? Is it a bad thing when a CS student wants to put his headphones in the computer lab to block out all the other converstations (sometimes in different languages) around him so that he can concentrate?

      Why can't normally social people find auditory solitude in their headphones without people accusing them of being "shy, sheilding, or anti-social"? Realize that people work differently from yourself, and having the headphones on can make them work better?
      • Is it a bad thing that Henry David Thoreau (walden) worked best when he removed himself from society?

        No, its certainly not a bad thing to take time off from the bustle of the world and engage in private work.

        However, how could Thoreau have been a humanist if he never took the time to interact and engage with humanity?

        Life experience is something that happens to you - you can't go looking for it.

        Social behavior is a defining characteristic of our species. It's true that different people have diff
        • by moonbender ( 547943 ) <moonbender@gUUUm ... inus threevowels> on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:22AM (#8498924)
          It's true that different people have different appetites for social interaction, but you can never be truly human if you decide to block out everything.

          Of course one could argue that either a) your definition of what is human and what is not is sheer arrogance and simply wrong or b) that it is correct and being human in accordance with your definition is just not something everybody would aspire to.

          For instance, I might say that you can never be truly human unless you understand vector calculus, but my s.o. would either disagree - or shrug and admit to not even wanting to be human if that is what it takes. For another example, I can very well imagine some religious persons claiming that religion is a defining characteristic of our species (history and society tend to agree) and say that you can never be truly human if you decide to block out God. To both of that my reply above stands.

          Not that I necessarily disagree with what you say, but I think it's a fairly subjective point, and a fairly weak one in a discussion. Cheers, anyway. ;)
      • And since when is anti-social behavior immediately seen as a negative thing.

        People are social animals. Period. Even when Thoreau was by himself at Walden Pond, he wrote about social things that he experienced before going to walden (Civil Disobedience, Self Reliance, etc), and he did eventually leave walden.

        A human that is not raised in a social environment would not be "human". Think Tarzan and whatnot.

        However, as with Self Reliance, it is nice, if not health and beneficial to be alone and in touch
        • Tarzan? No, not Tarzan. Think of mentally deficient, socially inept, and physically retarded.

          Kasper Hauser Syndrome has a lot to do w/a lack of social interaction as a child. It causes problems with stature, mental development (which is sometimes reversable), and social interactions.

          Book here [amazon.com] at Amazon.
    • by TwistedGreen ( 80055 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:06AM (#8498750)
      I think that people are shy enough as it is. We do very little REAL social interaction as it is.

      Well thanks for you opinion regarding the behaviour of the people around you. But please note that it is none of your business to be telling people that they don't act like you envision. Are you going to force them into uncomfortable situations in order to get them to conform to some social aesthetic? Are you going to go on saying that people should act more like you because they couldn't possibly be happy otherwise?

      Worthless ramblings indeed.
    • Not to put too fine a point on it, but I wear headphones in cube-land because all of the other conversations going on around me are distracting, especially the ones in foreign languages.

      Background noise pulls at attention, at least it does for me. Now, I have been known to listen to 'pink' noise instead of music just to drown out the conversations. This actually works better than Music often times, but is just hell on my mild tinitus.

      I think the anti-social aspects are a bit over played as well. Ask the p
    • by SmackCrackandPot ( 641205 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:14AM (#8498845)
      I see absolutely no reason for people to be listening to music while in any sort of educational institution.

      As I work in large research lab/room in a education institution, I can explain this. Perhaps it's the way that some people are wired, but may of us seem to use the audio buffers in our brains to store temporary information about the tasks we're doing. If there are any sudden loud noises, then we lose track of whatever we're doing, and have to start over again. Such noises include slamming door, someone racking their printouts from the laser printer to get the sides lined up (that seems to get to everyone), slamming shut the papers trays of the laser printer, rummaging through filing cabinets (opening and slamming doors). The only way to shield yourself from this continuous barrage of random "audio spam" is to wear a set of headphones and play something calming. (My favourite is Peter Gabriel's "Steam" or USURA's "Open Your Mind" for 3D animation work).

      Maybe I'm slightly autistic or something, but I've always found myself distracted by such information. Playing football on a playing field, and I'd find the wind turbulence patterns and the shadows of the clouds moving across the grass more interesting than the battle going on between two lumbering jocks at the centre of the field.
    • by yulek ( 202118 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:30AM (#8499025) Homepage Journal
      I work at a technical college and see numerous students with headphones on (I don't believe I have seen earbuds recently). I see absolutely no reason for people to be listening to music while in any sort of educational institution.

      How fascist of you.

      All of those who have worn headphones at the office without actually listening to anything raise your hand! [/me raises hand].

      It's a great way to get people to leave you alone when you're busy trying to concentrate; something that's very important in the modern office which often lacks even cubicles.

      Subconsciously or not, I sometimes put my headphones on, fully meaning to hit play on the playlist of the day but something takes my attention away and three hours later I'm still coding with winamp in stopped mode. But nevertheless, those were 3 uninterrupted hours.
    • I see absolutely no reason for people to be listening to music while in any sort of educational institution.

      I'm a maths student; like many students here, I do a lot of work on problem sheets (i.e. homework) between or after lectures, in the university maths department canteen/common room. I find wearing earphones and listening to music helps me to concentrate on what I'm doing by masking out random noises, the conversation on the next table, or whatever; also, even if I'm not making progress, I find music
    • I think that people are shy enough as it is. We do very little REAL social interaction as it is. Do we really want to become even more anti-social creatures by promoting music as some sort of "shield" from the outside world?

      People avoiding contact is perfectly normal urban behaviour. Stand on a crowded train and even if the person is an inch away from your face you will still avoid eye-contact. If you bump into him you'll probably both apologise. If she's an attractive young chick reading a book that y

  • by The I Shing ( 700142 ) * on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:43AM (#8498475) Journal
    Dr. Michael Bull was written up in Wired magazine, too, and Slashdot carried that story last month. Here it is. [wired.com]
  • Half a dupe. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by sammy baby ( 14909 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:43AM (#8498480) Journal
    Wired ran an article on this guy a couple of weeks ago [wired.com]. So, if you wondering why this sounds familiar [slashdot.org], now you know.
  • by el-spectre ( 668104 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:44AM (#8498484) Journal
    Some of us have to use headphones, as our music of choice violates obsenity laws and may damage small buildings...
  • by stevens ( 84346 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:45AM (#8498496) Homepage
    ...because the programmer over the cube wall was constantly humming songs to herself. There's nothing more maddening than listening to someone hum while you're trying to code. Headphones were mandatory.

    I dropped the headphones when I got an office. What a blessing.
    • by Savage-Rabbit ( 308260 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:28AM (#8498985)
      There's nothing more maddening than listening to someone hum while you're trying to code.

      What I hate the most is people with those hands free mobile ear/microphone sets. One of my colleagues whom I unfortunately have to work with alot has this annoying tendency to transition into a phonecall in the middle of a conversation. It annoys the hell out of everybody who has to deal with him since he has his phone switched to silent mode so there is no hint when somebody calls him, (which happens alot) causing him to drift off into a converstion whoever is on the phone and completely loose any interest in whoever he was talking to before. I don't think I have ever finsihed a conversation with that dude.
  • So true. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Shoten ( 260439 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:45AM (#8498500)
    I carry an MD player with me anywhere; I use it not just for music that suits my mood or for entertainment (life is more fun with its own soundtrack, don't you think?) but also to basically provide an excuse to ignore people (panhandlers, sidewalk vendors, ex-girlfriends...just kidding about the sidewalk vendors) that I don't want to interact with. But I never realized before that when I see someone else with headphones on, I've got this subconscious awareness of a kind of bubble around them which filters out certain kinds of interaction. I'd never think of asking a question or making small talk.
    • s/about the sidewalk vendors/about the ex-girlfriends/g
    • Re:So true. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ParadoxicalPostulate ( 729766 ) <saapad@gma i l .com> on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:00AM (#8498683) Journal
      I'd never think of asking a question or making small talk.

      Well, I agree that you are entitled to your own privacy and to not be disturbed at times, but you see people carrying these mp3 players everywhere. Whenever I go on the subway, every fourth person on the train is listening to music on their headphones.

      It comes to the point where people put on headphones wherever they go (as you said).

      Quoth the article, "listening to music acts as a shield, aura or cocoon."

      Let me make an analogy of an analogy. Perhaps, as technologically oriented individuals, we can consider this as being a firewall, or perhaps a blanket spam filter. The problem is, it filters everything out. It's like making a habit of putting a DND sign at your office or dorm entrance - it prevents you from interacting, having wonderful experiences.

      As I said in another post, life is worth living because it is dynamic and unpredictable. You will never know what you are missing if you choose to block out the world on a consistent basis. Maybe I am sitting on that subway train next to you, maybe we have some common interests. Maybe I have some interest tidbit of news, or a perspective on life or some other issue. But know what? That's too bad, because you'll never get to hear it, since I won't think to disturb you from listening to your music.

      Here's some advice: you're entitled to listen to your music, but once in a while get a little adventurous and take them off.
      • Re:So true. (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Shoten ( 260439 )
        I don't agree, though. I don't think it's like a firewall in that it's not content-ignorant, while a firewall is. When I see someone I do want to talk to, or something I do want to interact with, I turn them off and take them out of my ears. And by doing this, I produce a powerful effect; I've gone from the "Not interested" stance of having headphones on to the invitation to interact that is clearly demonstrated by obviously choosing to lower the shield for a particular person. And I am able to make topica
      • Re:So true. (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @12:49PM (#8499954)
        People shouldn't be forced into social interaction if they don't want. It isn't inherantly healthy. If you haven't heard about introverts and extraverts, read up on it. The basics are that introverts like to keep to themselves, extraverts like to interact with others. Most people fall somewhere along a continium in between.

        Neither is an inherantly better or correct way to be. American culture tends to put more value in being an extravert, Japanese culture tends to put more value in being an introvert. Really, we just need to have respect for differen't people's different comfort levels and likes and dislikes.

        For example I am generally an introvert. My idea of a good weekend is spending time at home sleeping, watching movies, playing computer games, and maybe going out with a small group of friends. If I go to something like a party, I like it to be small, no more than 15 people, and almost all people I know. My sister is a huge extravert. She works as a bartender is ALWAYS going out, loves gigantic parties, wants everyone to know who she is, etc.

        We are both happy, well adjusted people. I enjoy my life, she enjoys hers. Neither of us would enjoy the other's life. She would go insane sitting around at home for a weekend and I get really drained by having to go out all the time.

        So if the introverts want to use music as a way to shield them, that's fine and not an inherantly unhealthy thing. You can, of course, go to far. People do need SOME human contact, but that doesn't mean dealing with stangers. Some people have a very small comfort zone that doesn't easily grow to include new people. That is fine and that is normal.
      • Re:So true. (Score:3, Interesting)

        by jamesoutlaw ( 87295 )
        There are many times when I am on public transportation, on an airplane, or "stranded" (for lack of a better term) in a public place with strangers. Often I am not in the mood to listen to or chat with Joe Random about. I spend a large amout of my day around people and I relish every opportunity I have to enjoy a little "alone" time... it that means missing out on Joe Random's interesting insight into life, then so be it. I, however, don't feel that I am missing out on any wonderful experiences and to be
    • I know some people, particularly some girls, that will wear headphones and just let them dangle in their pocket. Not attached to anything. As noticed, you treat people differently when it looks like they're engaged in something else, except studying. So to keep people from bothering them (much) while trying to study they'll fake the headphones.

      J
    • Re:So true. (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Niten ( 201835 )

      You're very right - wearing headphones does create a sort of "social bubble" around oneself, which people are often reluctant to break casually.

      Two weeks ago at the University of Florida, the school was gearing up for its annual Student Government elections. The most memorable part of this yearly tradition is being continuously harassed for votes by members of both major parties as one walks through campus. It is no exaggeration to say that the week before elections, it can be hard to walk fifty feet with

  • by bloggins02 ( 468782 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:45AM (#8498503)
    He analyzes them as a "tool whereby users manage space, time and the boundaries around the self."

    Or could it be that they just want to listen to music?

    Nah....
  • by psycht ( 233176 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:45AM (#8498509) Homepage Journal
    I wish I had more opportunity to do this at work. Being able to separate yourself and focus on your work without being distracted it a heaven-sent.

    Alas, I'm on a helpdesk. That doesn't work out too well.
  • Is This Science??? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by moehoward ( 668736 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:45AM (#8498511)
    I don't see any empirical results. Have any experiments that he's done been reproduced? What are his methodologies.

    Sounds like junk-science to me. The guy has a hypothesis. That's about it.

    Here's my hypothesis: "Music sounds good. Noise sounds bad." Can someone write up an article on my thoughts? TIA.
  • by DrSkwid ( 118965 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:47AM (#8498534) Journal

    The University of Stating the Bleedin' Obvious ?

  • by DakotaK ( 727197 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:48AM (#8498550)
    Because it keeps me amused in study hall. ;)
    Seriously, though...this shows how much we've advanced. 100 years ago, you had to go out of your way to learn an insturment (such as a fiddle) to have music at all. Now, people have an mp3 player filled with any music they want on a whim. People can be listening to their own sort of "theme song" when they're in a certain mood. If you're bored and can't just go away (like my study hall plight), you can just flip on a song that reminds you of something that's happened or you want to happen, and slip away. It's a nice thing to be able to do.
  • original walkman (Score:3, Insightful)

    by theLastPossibleName ( 701919 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:49AM (#8498557)
    Wasn't the original walkman to shield the wearer from unwanted sound?

    I know I need to use my headphones at work to shield myself from the disturbing noises from the nearby cubicles. Pointy hair people blabbing about pointless things, people clipping finger nails, eating, etc.
    • Re:original walkman (Score:5, Informative)

      by CrazyTalk ( 662055 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:24AM (#8498938)
      I remember when the walkman first came out (yes, I'm that old) around 1980 or so. The big thrill at the time was not that you could be shielded from outside sound, it was quite the opposite - unliked the big bulky headphones of the day, you could actually hear the outside world/carry on a conversation with someone AND listen to music at the same time. That and, of course, portability were some of the selling points for the "early adopters".
  • by scumbucket ( 680352 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:49AM (#8498560)
    and so are personal stereos, where I work. Something about 'not being conductive to the work environment'. The problem is that there is so much racket from people around me talking on the phone, chatting, etc. that you NEED headphones (or something to block out the noise) sometimes to concentrate on the task at hand.


  • The whole reason humanity left africa and then spread out across the entire planet, is because most people would prefer to be left alone. We all want, for the most part, our own 100 acre plots of land.
    • by TGK ( 262438 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:02AM (#8498701) Homepage Journal
      That, and the air conditioner had yet to be invented.

    • by cap'n foolsy ( 635911 ) <demonstar311@y a h oo.com> on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:04AM (#8498728)
      yet we still want to be intimately connected to others somehow. the proliferation of things like friendster, livejournal, instant messaging have proven that.

      while i agree that i would like to own a 100 acre plot of land, it would be terribly lonely without someone to help me cultivate it, don't you think?

      or is it better to say, rather, that we would prefer to be left alone with people we like and people who are like us?
      • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) * on Monday March 08, 2004 @12:44PM (#8499900)
        yet we still want to be intimately connected to others somehow. the proliferation of things like friendster, livejournal, instant messaging have proven that.

        Even in the old days, people did not see each other all the time - once a week for church, or seeing people at the store.

        People do want connection - but connection that is controlled. Even IM you can shut down or choose to ignore. I would say intimately is an incrorect term - asynchronously is perhaps a more accurate way to define the kind of connection people want. connections that are instant to them, with inbound connections that can be controlled.

        Using music players in a setting with other people around is just a way of exerting some control over physical interactivity with others.
    • While humanity has been spreading out to new places ever since Africa, everywhere they go, a significant number of them tend to then congregate in towns/villages/cities/mega-cities. Now, rather then flee into the wilderness again in reaction to the stressors of this (which is really difficult nowadays), people control their personal space with headphones.
  • by burgburgburg ( 574866 ) <splisken06.email@com> on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:50AM (#8498571)
    a "tool whereby users manage space, time and the boundaries around the self."

    I thought that was what my Tardis was for.

  • Music while cycling (Score:3, Interesting)

    by whereiswaldo ( 459052 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:50AM (#8498576) Journal
    In some (or many?) places it is illegal to ride a bicycle with earphones on. Is there a safe and legal alternative besides fixating an open air personal stereo to your handlebars? I'd love to listen to music while I cycle.
  • by Lord Graga ( 696091 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:51AM (#8498581)
    I got tinitus (constant ringing for my ears) from too much heavy metal with headphones. So, be warned, it's not really worth it when you are home (I'm talking about people who use headphones in front of the computer).
    • by The I Shing ( 700142 ) * on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:59AM (#8498676) Journal
      I concur with the above reply. Please, please, if you are a young person who likes loud music, I beg you to be careful with your ears, and not make the mistakes that so many of my generation made. Maybe you think that you'll never, ever be in your thirties or forties and wishing that the ringing in your ears would go away and that you could hear again, but if you're blasting music into your ears, you will be. Doesn't matter if it's through headphones or that crazy car stereo that goes thump thump thump and scares people, the damage you do to your ears is permanent, and spending the second half of your adult life having to ask everyone to speak up and repeat themselves because of hearing loss suck-diddly-ucks.

      Please believe me, kids, you will be thirty years old one day, and how well you are able to hear at that time depends very much on how well you treat your delicate, sensitive ears today.
    • by junkymailbox ( 731309 ) * on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:12AM (#8498824)
      That's why I use professional earphones that are isolated. Some rate at -20 to -30db. http://www.shure.com. I can hear my own heartbeat when i put these on and I cant hear anything else. Instead of turning the music up and damaging my ear I can block everyone out and enjoy music at lower decibels.
  • by needacoolnickname ( 716083 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:51AM (#8498586)

    on the street is when I have my headphones on. They don't care. I can be in a crowd of people and they still come to me - they guy with the headphones on to ask directions, for a cigarette, for money.

    Don't these people know headphones mean Leave me alone!?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:55AM (#8498624)
    Maybe we need a wearable version of those hotel 'do not disturb' signs. It would fit around your neck and display your request that you be left alone on your chest for all to see. It would also be reversible so you can let everyone know when you want your bed linens changed.
  • by easter1916 ( 452058 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @10:58AM (#8498660) Homepage
    I read about this research last week and found it interesting -- so I emailed the good doctor and offered to participate. It took about 45 minutes to complete the survey that he sent, and the questions posed were, IMHO, very insightful. It made me realize just how much this simple device, the iPod, has changed how I listen to music and how I interact with the general public.
  • the fabric (Score:5, Funny)

    by sstory ( 538486 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:03AM (#8498710) Homepage
    I didn't know iPods could manage Space-Time. I guess that deserves the higher price.
  • by lutefish ( 746659 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:08AM (#8498766)
    I do find headphones tend to keep most of the riff-raff at bay. Similarly, I learned in college that in order to walk through the main 'square' of campus, it was advisable to be carrying things in both hands in order to avoid being flier-ed to death by eager student groups. Headphones, a cup of coffee, and a bag, along with that glazed-over 'I'm not here right now' look tend to work and keep the tree-killers at a loss, waving their fistfulls of fliers helplessly.
  • by GreenEggsAndHam ( 317974 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:08AM (#8498775)
    I had this argument only this morning with a colleague. He shouts across the office to another colleague and has ongoing conversations with the other chap at the top of his voice.

    When I asked him if he could have that conversation over IM he told me to stick my fingers in my ears or to listen to music.

    The problem is that I refuse to listen to music *because* that inconsiderate prick has the manners of a five year old.

    I listen to music when I know I'll be able to appreciate it fully, not as a means of protection. In the best of cases, I'm unable to concentrate on work when I have music playing : I love my tunes so much that I generally need to be able to dive into them fully. Impossible to concentrate on work when I have some lush tunes in my ears.

    I guess it's really just my problem seeing how all the other people here at work are OK with wearing earphones all day in order to keep the twit's shrill nasal voice our of their heads.

    Bummer.
    • I had this argument only this morning with a colleague. He shouts across the office to another colleague and has ongoing conversations with the other chap at the top of his voice.

      When I asked him if he could have that conversation over IM he told me to stick my fingers in my ears or to listen to music.

      First, buy a little voice recorder and record what he says.

      Then, buy the most expensive noise-blocking earphones yuo can find and bill him! If he refuses, threaten him with small claims court.

  • by suso ( 153703 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:23AM (#8498933) Journal
    One of my coworkers once said:

    It's going to be a headphone day.

    What he meant by that is that he needed to block out all the annoying noise coming out of other people's mouths and so on as they came back and asked questions. I do that sometimes too.
  • by crazyprogrammer ( 412543 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:23AM (#8498935) Homepage
    A lot of the employees where I work are Mexican and most of them have cd players/radios and listen to spanish music all day. Most of the American workers have cd players/radios to listen to music in english. What ends up happening everyday is someone turns the volume up on their radio a little bit and a chain reaction starts. By the end of the day everyone has to yell to talk to the person next to them.

  • by B5_geek ( 638928 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:24AM (#8498949)
    I was just thinking about this type of habit this morning.

    What genres of music do you listen to that correspond to your activities?

    This is how I have my playlists setup:

    gaming: Dance-hip hop-techno
    coding: classical
    browsing: top40 (70's, 80's & 90's)
    General computer activities: all of the above

    How do your activities influence what you want to listen to?
  • by throwaway18 ( 521472 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @11:27AM (#8498981) Journal
    I sometimes use headphones as a concentration aid when working at a computer. I found listening to music distracing so I tried listen to white noise for a while. I used a radio tuned to an empty VHF frequency, ocasionally I'd hear voices drifting in from hundreds of miles away and end up playing ham radio instead of working.

    I'v now assembled a playlist of no-vocals no-beats ambient music. Classical is ok but all the well known tracks remind of of adverts.
  • by Ayandia ( 630042 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @12:37PM (#8499800)
    I absolutely refuse to walk to my office without headphones. Every morning I walk north from Penn Station NY down 8th ave. I only have a few blocks to go, but it's like a gauntlet of questionable social interactions. People furiously wave papers for barbershops and other crap in your way, "Change? Change?", and the nasty people who spend all day hanging around hitting on anything in heels.

    Add sunglass and headphones and the world is my music video. Not to mention I'm preserving my desire to have children some day by wearing headphones on the train.

    Then I spend all day listening to internet radio so I can focus on my work and not hear the loud office gossip over from the next area. We have an open office design where teams share a large square space, all facing outward to a shared desk. Good for teamwork, bad for concentration.

    I would get nothing done without headphones...and that only on the days I could bear to come to work.
  • by gobbo ( 567674 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @01:38PM (#8500585) Journal
    Since this is a rerun story, I'm going to repost myself from a few weeks back:

    Hildegard Westerkamp [www.sfu.ca] wrote about Walkmans and personal audio space as a key part of her 1988 thesis "Listening and Soundmaking-A Study of Music-as- Environment", but the World Soundscape Project generally had a pretty good analysis of this right from the beginning of the phenomenon.

    The composer R. Murray Shafer's concept of "schizophonia" [www2.sfu.ca] became used to describe an effect of electroacoustic tech: essentially something you hear that happens in another place and time. Barry Truax's definitive book Acoustic Communication [www.sfu.ca] develops the whole idea further.

    The thing about PLD's is that they supplant the actual soundscape with a soundtrack, often a remedy to noise and stress but usually just fun. There may be a long-term chronic danger from extreme schizophonia, but I don't think it's been studied empirically. Soundscape studies is fringe, most of the work being done in the area is engineering and psych.

    Now I don't know that Bull has ignored soundscape studies in general, but it is the true home of sound nerds who move beyond the engineering and get into the social, psychophysics, and ecological aspects of sound, and the article should have mentioned it at least. If you're interested in the field at all, you need to check out the World Forum for Acoustic Ecology [uoregon.edu], where this stuff is hashed out on many levels.

  • by borg1238 ( 692335 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @02:02PM (#8500861)
    Through interviews with Walkman owners and now iPod buyers, he found that listening to music acts as a shield, aura or cocoon.

    These must have been difficult interviews to get:
    "Sir... uh... sir? Would you like to participate... sir? Can you hear me? Sir?!"
  • by Ohreally_factor ( 593551 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @02:04PM (#8500875) Journal
    A very interesting study that dovetails with some thoughts I've had on the subject.

    I've seen similar "control of personal space" with cell phones (and not suprisingly here in Los Angeles) automobiles.

    All three offer a way to insulate yourself from your immediate surroundings, albeit in slightly different ways.

    A simple example of this is driving a car thru a neighborhood, rather than driving in a neighborhood. The car is an environment unto itself that allows one to pass through another physical space with a minimum of interaction.

    As an experiment, I've stopped driving my car in favor of public transportation. Granted, I listen to an iPod, as do many of my fellow riders, but even in this case, I am much less insulated. This is also the case when I walk to and from bus stops and rail stations.

    I am actually preferring this mode of transport, and have a renewed love of my city. This probably has much to do with the fact that I am experiencing it differently, interacting with my fellow Angelenos more (despite my iPod), and actually being in my environment, rather than being in my car. Previously, much of my Los Angeles experience was that of being stuck on the freeway, "interacting" with other cars (and sometimes their drivers), most of which were either going too slow or too fast. There are no roses on the freeway.

    I haven't owned a cell phone in several years, but I notice a similar phenomena. While one is talking on the phone, a large part of one's attention is placed on the person on the other end of the conversation. There is an overlap between one's presence in the real world and a sort of virtual telephone world. This is most noticeable with people using ear sets, and positively dangerous with people driving cars (especially SUVs, but that's another topic!).

    I once watched what I thought was a crazy person walking down the street, ranting and raving about hockey of all things. It was a bit puzzling, since he seemed to be dressed to nicely to be a crazy street person. When he came close enough, I saw that he was talking on a hands-free phone, and was totally oblivious of his surroundings. Other than the fact that he was on the phone, his behavior was completely that of a mentally deranged person hearing voices.

    Something of further interest that I haven't spent much time reflecting on is the passive aggressive nature of behavior I've observed in those that use these insulating technologies; especially obnoxious/oblivious drivers, loud cell phone talkers, and the now thankfully less common boom box wielders.
  • Cubicle Farm... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Lodragandraoidh ( 639696 ) on Monday March 08, 2004 @02:39PM (#8501285) Journal
    My working day is spent in a cubicle farm. All day long I hear multiple phone conversations going on all day around me.

    I am a developer - which means I need to concentrate, very deeply at times. The background noise level is high enough that I can actually hear various conversations for cubes that are close to mine. This can be distracting particularly when you are trying to formulate an idea or write code, as you will find yourself start to listen to the conversations, instead of following your internal dialogue.

    To combat this, I sometimes don headphones and get some music going to drown out the conversations (preferably music without any words).

    Ideally, developers should have doors that close to block out these distractions - they would be much more productive. Unfortunately, management doesn't think that way...so productivity suffers.

    I just want some silence so my mind can think. Until they make the 'cone of silence' generally available in cubicle farms, earphones and music will have to do.

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...