USAF Studies Teleportation 678
ArchAngel21x writes "Star Trek fans may be happy to hear that the Air Force has paid to study psychic teleportation.
But scientists aren't so thrilled. The Air Force Research Lab's August 'Teleportation Physics Report', posted earlier this week on the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) Web site, struck a raw nerve with physicists and critics of wasteful military spending."
For the love of..... (Score:5, Insightful)
From the linked
What!!!!!???? I am thunderstruck that this recommendation could be made. 1.5 Million dollars for essentially a program that the CIA back in the 1970's decided was full of crap and decided to abandon. By the way, the CIA's program was ill conceived and full of it back then too amounting to a huge waste of taxpayer dollars.
Other conclusions in the document are: "We will need a physics theory of consciousness and psychotronics, along with more experimental data, in order to test the hypothesis in Section 5.1.1 and discover the physical mechanisms that lay behind the psychotronic manipulation of matter." What can I say? The status of basic science education among those who make funding decisions within certain areas of government are pitiful.
Even worse is this statement: "This phenomenon could generate a dramatic revolution in technology, which would result from a dramatic paradigm shift in science. Anomalies are the key to all paradigm shifts! " which has got to be the work of someone with a marketing background and absolutely no self respect in the scientific community. A document like this would be laughed out of the NIH or any other respectable scientific funding agency, but the scary thing is funding like this has always been able to go forward under the guise of military funding in crisis situations where fear abounds. Combine that with no understanding of science and this is what you get. If any of my students came up with something like this, I think I would cry.
Hey, if the Air Force wants out of the box thinkers, I can come up with all sorts of biomemetic and bioencryption stuff for 1.5 Million that would be based in scientific fact with reliable peer review science behind it.
Watch out when your sleeping tonight (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Watch out when your sleeping tonight (Score:4, Funny)
Then he would have to worry about my corporal body kicking back.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:5, Interesting)
However, the statement you lambasted,
"This phenomenon could generate a dramatic revolution in technology, which would result from a dramatic paradigm shift in science. Anomalies are the key to all paradigm shifts"
is quite true, if a bit sensationalistic. I'm not certain, as you said, it shows "no understanding of science". It's a reasonable paraphrase of some of the assertions in Thomas Kuhn's 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" which is the backbone (along with Popper's ideas and some french folks' theories) of modern conceptions of science and how science changes.
Sometime somewhere someone really made a big mistake, and thus this research program was born. However crap it may be, though, it does show awareness of modern approaches to scientific change.
RD
Re:For the love of..... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:For the love of..... (Score:5, Insightful)
RD
Re:For the love of..... (Score:5, Funny)
Krusty: So he's proactive, huh?
Lady: Oh, God, yes. We're talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.
Writer: Excuse me, but 'proactive' and 'paradigm'? Aren't these just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important? Not that I'm accusing you of anything like that.
Myers: Oh, yes! - The rest of you writers start thinking up a name for this funky dog; I dunno, something along the line of say... Poochie, only more proactive.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Funny)
(I have got to stop taliing to marketers. It's not healthy).
Re:For the love of..... (Score:4, Funny)
Yes, I'll hold.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Insightful)
No, no, no... rethink this. You need to be fair. (Score:5, Funny)
As a successful businessman who has handled many ticklish employee issues, let me explain how you should actually deal with this.
First, you fire them using the normal politically correct "here are your final paychecks, and the Human Resources department's collective foot in your collective asses" procedure.
But you inform them that if they can teleport back in, they can have their jobs back.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:2)
Now why is the USA going down the road to Lysenkoism? This was sort of crackpot science run under Stalin. There's an article on this shift in the USA at http://www.cosmos-club.org/journals/1995/seitz.htm l
Re:For the love of..... (Score:4, Funny)
Even sarcasm.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:5, Insightful)
I saw this in the telecom industry. Our company had a mania for the "make or buy" decision. That meant, in practice, that the money went to the group that made the biggest promises. Consequently, everyone promised more than they could actually accomplish. Managers knew that, of course, but they went along because they were subject to the same pressures. You could see, year after year, more hyperbole and overstatement creeping into goal statements, mission statements, and everything. It becomes an erosion of honesty, and (like in lysenkoism), one can imagine drifting off into a fantasy world.
In industry, of course, the free market will eventually stop such corporate fantasies. If only because people stop buying the resulting products and the company flounders.
Another example of such over-promising is the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology. Mind you, the ISN is a bunch of competent people doing real research, and I expect them to do great things. Still, they cannot resist making wild promises on their web site, http://web.mit.edu/isn/aboutisn/index.html [mit.edu].
"Imagine a bullet-proof jumpsuit, no thicker than ordinary spandex, that monitors health, eases injuries, communicates automatically, and maybe even lends superhuman abilities."
Uh huh. Lemme see. How much force needs to be applied to stop a bullet in the thickness of spandex? Quite a bit. If you do a minor calculation, you'll find it's completely ridiculous, yet these guys with physics Ph.D.s tolerate this kind of crap as advertisement.
They tolerate it because if they don't, someone else will say it, and that someone will get the money. The Army guys play along. That way, they can presumably point out to congressmen the wonderful things they will get from their research money.
Personally, I think that the root of the problem is that no one is really paid to evaluate these research proposals. It's expected to be done in one's spare time.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:4, Informative)
Really stiff materials transmit waves very well, and really thin things transmit very little energy in the form of waves out along the thickness of the material - most goes right in. Real bullet proof vests are thick, made of materials that are not very strong (kevlar is a type of nylon) but are very light and absorb a lot of energy. Also think of window glass - very strong, very stiff, can't absorb much energy VS polycarbonate, the plastic known as bullet proof glass.
Visco-elastic materials behave in a similar way, and most metals behave differently under very high strain rates - but you really need something to absorb energy, so the opposite would be better. Something that gets squishy and squirts everywhere is a whole lot of energy that doesn't get through. Thixotrophic mud (spelling will be wrong) gets sloppier when you stir it.Someone is bound to post back that kevlar really is strong - it is very strong for a polymer and it doesn't weigh much per unit volume, so people tend to confuse strength to weight ratios with strength. However, something an inch thick is going to be stronger made from low quality steel than kevlar. Stength is how much force a material can take for a given cross section - that's all it is.
There are stronger polymers than kevlar, but you wouldn't want to use them in a bullet proof vest since they don't absorb much energy.
The market isn't truly free, but is mostly free... (Score:3, Interesting)
A company or industry that's doing well can try to extract concessions from politicians (DMCA, antitrust wrist-slaps, telcom regulation, etc) and a company that's not doing well can generate political pressure to save jobs. And the former annoys me greatly, as I can tell it annoys you [slashdot.org].
But I find it hard to dismiss the sense that there is a "mostly free" market out there, having watched closely billion-dollar companies fall (SGI), and from a distan
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Informative)
The really bad part about Lysenkoism was the guy's ability to send representatives of competing scientific ideas to GULAG -- through the universal accusations of treason.
As long as that ability is nowhere to be seen around here (and it is not), bringing up the scumbag's name is no better than mentioning Nazis :-)
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Insightful)
There is also more to Lysenkoism than sending people you don't like away - and it is better that we don't go down to path to the nations science being controlled by crackpots.
Missile Defense (Score:3, Informative)
Given the choice, 8 million that MIGHT have a radical payoff is a bargain. Billions spent on a specific application of physics is pointless. Even if the system works, the only application for a missile defense system is knocking out high-speed projectiles.
It won't help with knocking out asteroids (too much kinetic energy involved) nor will it help defend against more mon
Re:Missile Defense (Score:4, Funny)
Psychic Research is probably about the only way they're ever going to find Bin Laden anyway.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Interesting)
It really came down to the company being a lot better at selling itself to these agencies
Re:For the love of..... (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with paying somebody to do some background research on potentially "out there" research areas, and figure out what application they might have to the military. However, with rather complicated topics like this, they should be hiring people with appropriate qualifications, and relying on a review of the research by qualified scientists before they do anything else with it. I assume they would do that before pouring millions a year into some of this stuff.
The point where I start becoming wary is the point where he starts saying things like this:
The debate among scientists and scientific philosophers is highly charged at times, and becomes acrimonious to the point where reputable skeptical scientists cease being impartial by refusing to examine the experimental data or theories, and they prefer to bypass rational discourse by engaging in ad hominem attacks and irrational "armchair" arguments.
I don't know the specifics of the Chinese studies he mentions, but I know that most of the psychokinetic stuff from the 70s has been thoroughly discredited when repeated under controlled conditions. If you can only bend a spoon with your mind when its your spoon and your on national TV, then I don't think you're really bending the spoon with your mind. Incredible claims require incredibly strong evidence to back them up. If this guy can repeat any of the results that the Chinese studies he mentions were able to produce (he says they were repeatable, but fail to say by whom - if they just said they were repeatable, that fails to rule out the most likely explanation of simple scientific fraud), then by all means, fund away.
It is a bit disturbing is that this same fellow is making recommendations on military funding of mainstream scientific propositions, like quantum cryptography and computation, entanglement research, and thereotical string theory stuff. And he thinks they should wait-and-see while D-Brane theory matures, but run full steam ahead with psychokinetic research.
He also seems to recommend that some of the most outrageous and least likely to pay off topics should be pursued the most vigorously, like "biological quantum teleportation", based on a single, unpublished paper in the arxiv.org online repository (i.e. a non-peer reviewed scientific publication with no credibility to speak of). Additionally, he recommends funding FTL communication based on entanglement, demonstrating a complete lack of understanding of the concept of group vs. phase velocity. Without at least an inkling of which direction to go, funding a million bucks a year of FTL communications research based on the irrelevant mechanism behind entanglement is useless.
So yes, this guy is a quack, but it looks like nobody is taking the recommendations seriously. Was the study a waste of $25,000 (what the Yahoo News article says the company was paid for this work)? Perhaps, but lots of small research projects happen and end up going nowhere, and like they say, it's sometimes worth pursuing a bit of cursory research in even unlikely areas to see if anything interesting gets turned up. In this case, it didn't pay off (and I doubt this guy will be doing any more studies for the Air Force).
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Interesting)
But this is an advocation for 8 Million dollars of taxpayer funded money. A lot of good science can be done with 8 Million dollars.
don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with paying somebody to do some background research on potentially "out there" research areas, and figure out what application they might have to the
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Insightful)
' Incredible claims require incredibly strong evidence to back them up.'
This is a ridiculus statement to make. All claims should be judged by the same criterea. Just because you think the claim is ridiculus you should not be able to raise the bar for proof beyond any other claim. Science is science, proof is proof. You don't get to say "this proof is not sufficient because your claim is incredible".
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Insightful)
When exactly does science "prove" something?
How does science or the scientific method "prove" something?
It doesn't.
It gathers evidence to support hypotheses, which then may become theories, laws and paradigms. But it hasn't "proven" anything. It provides the most likely explanation, at best.
And I think it is reasonable to expect that incredible claims have incredibly strong evidence to back them up. Otherwise, they are unlikely to be accepted. If you claim teleportatio
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Informative)
sounds like the Soviet Union (Score:4, Interesting)
you can find a lot by yahoo searching for Scalar Weapons which is a system suposedly developed in the 60s and 50s which the USSR can use to control the weather, and used to shoot down the Challenger space shuttle.
remote viewing in the CIA is something that's on the Discovery channel on cable all the time -- also shows about crop circles, UFOS, and "psychic profilers" solving murder mysteries
similar quackery was investigated by the Nazi scientists who were deeply into the occult and other "black arts" including the flat earth society and the hollow earthers (how do you reconcile those two groups? flat and hollow??)
In fact, a squad of Nazi troops took a super large cannon/gun out to an island in the middle of the ocean and tried shooting STRAIGHT UP trying to shoot across the "hollow earth" center to rain shells down on London. It didn't work.
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Insightful)
I mean, *everone* knows the Earth is the center of the universe...
And as for those "invisible streams of particles" - *I* don't see any particles, and I don't feel them either! Everyone knows you're making it u
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Insightful)
A teenage friend of my daughter told me the other day about his desire to get free energy out of magnets. His theory was that since they're constantly pushing against each other, you can use that push to power a
Re:For the love of..... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:For the love of..... (Score:3, Insightful)
It's the result of the culture of government. Work in it and you'll see it in person. I can only speak to loca
Carte blanche? (Score:2, Insightful)
Heh. I guess that's like during the good old Cold War. If you just got some sort of an idea of how to beat the enemy, you've got a blank check.
Re:Carte blanche? (Score:2)
apparently without putting any thought into the implications of the technology being developed! imagine for a moment that teleportation is actually developed. if this technology falls into the "wrong hands" (ie anyone who doesn't subscribe to u.s. hegemony) the result is a total and complete disaster.
with true, receiverless teleportation, no geographic area is safe. period. governments and financial/industrial insti
Re:Carte blanche? (Score:3, Funny)
Dude, it's *psychic* technology... it's in everyone's head already.
Why is this a surprise? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not? (Score:5, Interesting)
No, I am not suggesting some kind of bizarre conspiracy, just some 'front project' to cover up something that may involve new laser assault/defense systems, sonic weaponry, or new methods of fighter control mechanisms or something that might be really cool, really plausible or equally 'cool' yet disturbingly vile that they would rather not explain to the American public or Congress.
So, seeing that most of the nation, albiet only by a small fraction in the larger scheme of things, would fall for such crap, they decided to trot out that story. One, to be able to push it past such science-blind people as the majority of this nation and secondly to thumb their noses at the rest of us that would know and understand such a thing is bollox, yet are unfortunately unable to do anything significant about it...
Re:Why not? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why not? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why is this a surprise? (Score:5, Interesting)
Traditional evangelicalism is more like you describe. This was a product of the enlightemnent - everything must be proved/explained - so you'll find those kinds of christian more 'bookish' and generally reject experience as a means to understand anything.
Interesting society is still changing - I've been to churches where dogma is almost anatheama and everything is debated and reasoned out, and it's not uncommon for everyone to have a completely different opinion - my own feeling is that will be mainstream within 20 years (at the moment it's a few hundred 'emerging' churches), as society is
already a long way along that road - you can see it in slashdot between the 'QT might be true, you never know' and the 'this is bollocks' type of people, getting into arguments about how it's wrong to say anything is bollocks just based on solid scientific evidence...
Why must you mock me? (Score:5, Funny)
I resent the fact that you imply my beliefs are backwards and illogical. I think it makes perfect sense to believe that Jesus Christ was a virgin when he was born.
STOP MOCKING ME!
Well (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Well (Score:4, Insightful)
The thing is... it doesn't.
Re:Well (Score:5, Funny)
I have also called Cleo and she said she sees the project failing.
Re:Well (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Well (Score:5, Informative)
There is also good science to suggest that the theory of relativity is real, every day in particle accelerators across the world it's used to make predictions that turn out.
The combination of conservation of energy, and relativity suggests that on any largish scale, there can be no teleportation. Of course these things break down when quantum theory is important, but quantum theory seems to be unlikely to be important for the teleportation of large scale objects over large distances.
the way this goes is that conservation of energy (and mass, which is energy in relativity) must be a local phenomena, because if it is non-local, then two different observers will see things differently, one sees that mass a disappears and mass b appears simultaneously at a different spot, another observer moving in a different relative frame will NOT see these as simultaneous, thereby violating conservation of energy since mass b will appear first, then mass a disappear.
when you bring in quantum theory, there is uncertainty involved, and relativity hasn't exactly been melded properly with quantum, so things get a little more muddy, but we're talking about very SMALL effects on the order of 10^-34 joule seconds (hbar).
IN other words, there is already a huge set of scientific evidence against the idea that this is possible.
Re:Well (Score:5, Insightful)
However, most scientists that discuss teleportation don't talk about simultaneous teleportation. That *would* definitely be impossible due to relativity, like you mentioned.
In reality, quantum teleportation is a legitimate scientific topic (that's what I study, as a matter of fact). It's possible because the teleportation isn't instantaneous- it happens at a speed less than or equal to the speed of light. The reason it is called teleportation is that quantum effects are used to make a particle disappear from point A and reappear at point B (a suitable time later) without crossing the intervening space. Cool, huh?
This effect has already been demonstrated for photons, and limited effects have been demonstrated for single atoms. Whether or not it will ever be possible on a larger scale is a matter of debate... but it isn't a debate about relativity.
Totally wrong (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Well (Score:3, Informative)
There is also good science to suggest that the theory of relativity is real, every day in particle accelerators across the world it's used to make predictions that turn out.
The combination of conservation of energy, and relativity suggests that on any largish scale, there can be no teleportation. Of course these things break down when quantum theory is important, but quantum theory seems to be unlike
Re:Well (Score:5, Insightful)
There is also good science to suggest that the theory of relativity is real, every day in particle accelerators across the world it's used to make predictions that turn out.
The combination of conservation of energy, and relativity suggests that on any largish scale, there can be no teleportation.
In the 19th century, there was "good science to suggest" that, given a strong enough rocket engine, objects can be accelerated to speeds bigger than 300000km/s. There was also "good science" that suggested that the space is flat and euclidian.
What i'm saying is, your argument boils down to "our present knowledge is perfect, thereby anything contradicting it cannot exist."
I am not saying that said teleportation project is sound and sane. I am saying that one should look at whatever paradigm he/she adheres to with caution.
Too often i see people otherwise rational that seem to imply that psychic phenomena are made impossible by the simple fact that a million newagers believe in them ("if a pothead believes in X, then X does not exist"). A million newagers may have an irrational belief, yet that does not make certain things impossible.
Again, i am not implying anything, i just don't like it when people take a transitory scientific paradigm as dogma.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Bait and Switch? (Score:2, Insightful)
random slashdot quote (Score:5, Interesting)
Dan Tedrick
Classified (Score:3, Insightful)
With the current administration... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:With the current administration... (Score:2)
Please give examples.
Re:With the current administration... (Score:5, Informative)
Link 2 [issues2000.org]
Just a couple of examples.
Re:With the current administration... (Score:3, Interesting)
It is not fair until religious organizations pay taxes. Presently, they're parasites, a condition created and continuously enabled by pathological government favoritism.
Re:With the current administration... (Score:3, Insightful)
No. I have a point anyway. A very solid one. I'll make it in some detail for you to pick at.
Look here: I pay taxes; the government builds roads. My family drives on roads and otherwise benefits from roads. So I am really pretty happy to pay for roads.
In sharp contrast, the church doesn't pay taxes. However, churchies drive on roads, the materials to build their churches are delivered on roads, etc.
Ergo - and there really is no way out of
Re:With the current administration... (Score:4, Funny)
Constitutional amendment proposal (Score:3, Interesting)
If that's not theocratic I don't know what is.
zerg (Score:5, Funny)
"Guys, you're not gonna believe this! Last night, I as at this strip club, I closed my eyes and when I opened them, I was face down in the gutter a few blocks away!"
Stephen King's short story about teleportation (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Stephen King's short story about teleportation (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Stephen King's short story about teleportation (Score:3, Informative)
Hey, if they want to waste money... (Score:5, Insightful)
Just pay me a few million, and I'll do whatever research into fantasy physics that they want. I'll even throw in a few Powerpoint presentations for good measure.
If the choice is between spending billions on reserching quackery in the military, or spending the same money on bringing US education up to decent levels, I think the education would be money better spent. We might even end up with politicians who know the difference between Sweden and Switzerland.
But if they're determined to throw money away on absurdity, then the least they can do is throw some of it in my direction. I think I could find better uses for it than anyone the USAF could hire from the Psychic Hotline.
Re:Hey, if they want to waste money... (Score:3, Funny)
Hey, I can't fault that mistake. They probably got their information off of the Internets.
Re:Hey, if they want to waste money... (Score:4, Insightful)
Insulting... (Score:5, Interesting)
Please, this is an insult to Star Trek fans everywhere. The Star Trek vision, if anything, was about using science and technology to enhance people's lives. It was and is in no way about this pseudo-scientific nonsense. (BTW, "pseudo" in this context means "false, but masquerading as", NOT, "kinda" or "quasi".)
If anything, Star Trek fans would (and should) be appalled by this.
End of rant.
Re:Insulting... (Score:4, Funny)
Which is why about half the aliens they encounter are telepathic, psychic, equipped with ESP, able to transition into pure energy, or have telekinetic powers. And that was before the bloody Pah-wraiths which turned the end of Deep Space Nine into something resembling Buffy the Vampire Slayer...
Re:Insulting... (Score:3, Insightful)
If anything, Star Trek fans would (and should) be appalled by this.
My sentiments exactly. I'm a bit taken aback by the negative comments you got on this. I think Trek fans are probably bothered when ST deviates from a hard sci-fi stance. But, I think even when ST deviates into new-agey garbage, there is still a basis to say it isn't magic, just a technology humans don't yet understand. For example - worm hole aliens = Bajor's gods. I placate myself with Clark's "any sufficiently advanced technolog
Coverup (Score:5, Funny)
My 2 cents... (Score:3, Interesting)
What proof do I have? Just look at Sam Cassel.
Re:My 2 cents... (Score:3, Funny)
If that isn't evidence of UFO's I don't know what is.
Really... (Score:2)
RTFA!!!! (Score:5, Informative)
It's a joke (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously, this is some fan-boy trying to rile up the millitary conspiracy theorists (and apparently doing quite well).
Until the DoD comes out and says, "yes, this is ours and we published it in all seriousness," please stop believing everything you read on the Internet.
Re:It's a joke (Score:4, Interesting)
On a related note, I was once working on a very serious project where I named all of the client systems after food - chicken, pizza, and taco, and named the server Megadoomer after an Invader Zim episode. I just about died trying not to fall over laughing when my coworkers would turn red with embarassment when discussing the network during meetings because they thought the names were terribly silly. But it was government work, so nobody cared enough to make me change anything.
I think this should be encouraged... (Score:2)
They could spend less money searching for... (Score:2)
http://www.usanetwork.com/series/thedeadzone/ [usanetwork.com]
Johnny Smith could really help save some money here.
IronChefMorimoto
Quantum Physics and the Quantum Mind (Score:4, Interesting)
Quantum theory (at least mathematically) does allow for teleportation, and so capabilities such as "remote viewing" and so forth *might* be there. But who knows.
Re:Quantum Physics and the Quantum Mind (Score:3, Insightful)
his logic seems to be:
-consciousness is mysterious
-quantum physics is mysterious
-therefore consciousness involves quantum physics
about as sensible as collecting underpants
Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm quite frankly tired of the hypocrisy I see on ./. On the one hand you accuse the christian right of being bigoted or closed minded while in the same breath demonstrate how close minded and bigoted you are.
Want to see who you are complaining about? Look in the mirror.
Science is supposed to be a tool for discovery, not a religion like some of you make it out to be.
Is aids research a waste of money because no cure has been found yet? Are all studies that reach a dead end a waste of money or do they provide us with valuable insight?
Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals (Score:3, Insightful)
The additional skepticism most people apply to claims of telekenesis probably comes from the fact that is an overwhelming number of counter-examples in everyday experience. Can you move objects with your mind? I can't. Therefore I am not very likely to readily believe that anyone can. This is
Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals (Score:3, Insightful)
Ah... moderate or post, moderate or post... let's post:
This is logically unsound. This assumes that TK is something that doesn't need training (or perhaps innate ability). This implies that it exists in a particular manner,
Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals (Score:3, Insightful)
Exactly. We're being critical of the report because it recommends that the U.S. military spend millions on research on dubious ideas, with no evidence that the ideas have any merit.
I'm quite frankly tired of the hypocrisy I see on
Re:Closed minded psuedo-intellectuals (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, that is not how science works. If scientists accepted and looked for evidence for or against every hypothesis, we would never make any progress. You have to have some way of filtering the small number of ideas that are likely to be fruitful from the much larger pool of ideas that aren't going to get you anywhere. The way we do this is through a paradigm--an ove
Missed opportunity... (Score:3, Insightful)
(Or maybe the idea simply hasn't gotten by peer-reviewed publications?)
(Sure... Isn't that what they all say?)
I guess it might be worthwhile in a very preliminary report to give all of the options equal consideration, but to suggest that they all deserve funding for further research makes the study kind of pointless. I wonder if they people who commissioned this report can actually take it seriously?
Biological counterargument to psychic phenomena (Score:4, Interesting)
It is unlikely that humanity is unique in have some never-before evolved power. The more scientists study animals, the more they find that humans are not qualitatively different from other creatures, only quantitatively different. Other creatures can count, create tools, have emotions, participate in social structures, practice deception, be aware of what others might think or do, etc. We exhibit these properties to a greater degree than do animals, but we are not unique. (In fact if humans did have psychic power, they would have little need for social systems, tools, etc. because psychic power would let them snare prey/beings with lesser powers.)
Finally, we find no "physical" basis for psychic power. The four forces of gravity, eletromagnetism, the weak force, and the strong force do not provide a basis for psychic power. It is unlikely that some magic biologically created material could manifest and manipulate some unknown fifth force without either biologists, chemists, or physicists becoming aware of it..
Re:Spider Sense (and roaches and flies, oh my) (Score:5, Informative)
Very good point, many creatures do have "super-human" senses. The spider nerves are a great quantitative tweak on neuronal engineering - bigger diameter axons carry signals faster and the small size of spiders means the latencies are extremely low.
Other creatures have abilities that seem near-psychic but are not when you study the creature further. Cockroaches have sensitive hairs on their tails that pick up the air pressure wave that precedes any subsonic moving object. Because the pressure wave travels at about 700 miles per hour (the speed of sound), the cockroach feels the swatter approaching long before it reaches the roach. As a double advantage the hairs are wired directly to the legs so the roach flees the instant something starts moving its way without "thinking."
Flies have a 3-stage pipelined visual system that operates a 400 Hz (compared to human's 60 Hz system). They see the swatter and react more quickly than the human eye.
Electric fish use an active electric field to map their surroundings in muddy water. Dolphins and bats use ultrasound. Mantis shrimp see 6 color bands and 4 polarizations. Pit vipers see far IR. Etc. All of these amazing examples rely on well know physics to let the animal sense what a human cannot.
Geez, don't you ever get out to the movies?
Unfortunately no!
Re:Spider Sense (and roaches and flies, oh my) (Score:4, Funny)
Flies have a 3-stage pipelined visual system that operates a 400 Hz (compared to human's 60 Hz system). They see the swatter and react more quickly than the human eye.
Why do Americans always assume the rest of the world goes by their standards?
The human visual system, as we Europeans all know very well, runs on 50 Hz here. But this is more than well compensated for by our higher count of rods and staffs.
Psychic Teleportation (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah. It's called 'walking.' Or am I looking at it totally wrong?
Hope be with ye,
Cyan
When was this thing written? (Score:3, Informative)
Great flipping Cthulhu on a pogo stick... (Score:4, Informative)
It might have helped had the authors of this report read the rest of Visser, however. Such as the calculations showing that exotic matter is intrinsically quantum-mechanically unstable, to the extent that such a wormhole will collapse within a time strictly less than the time it takes for a light signal to get through said wormhole.
Which is good, because teleportation by wormhole lets information travel faster than light and is therefore equivalent to building a time machine.
I really hope that we don't have our government funding research into time machines. Because then this is going to start sounding like a very bad movie plot.
First tests seem to work (Score:4, Funny)
What for? (Score:3, Funny)
Scientists have one major flaw (Score:5, Insightful)
Now I'm not saying that necessarily this teleportation stuff has any merit. I just want to point out that if you're quick to say "what crap" then you might have fallen into the trap that leads minds to stagnate; that is, to believe that existing human knowledge is complete.
If there's one thing we can bet on, it's that human knowledge is far from complete and we are far from understanding the true nature of things. We are naive creatures with limited understandings of things. Perhaps the military is more willing to gamble funding in new directions, because unlike academics their main goal isn't to protect their researching asses for the rest of their lives. Their goal is to develop new tools that the enemy doesn't have.
Recommend: The Conscious Universe, Dean Radin (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyway, the above book covers a lot of studies headed up real scientists, and there is a lot of interesting data out there; the effects they find are not huge, but they are statistically signifigant and worthy of investigation.
If someone has an odd idea, fine -
Hardly surprising. (Score:3, Funny)
ages, this seems only like the tip of the
iceberg.
With Bush in office, I expect the next couple of
years to be packed with amusement from your witch
hunts to your basic alchemy courses taught in
schools and maybe some sacrifices made to the
gods if the stock market goes up.
miguel.
Re:Basic theory of science (Score:4, Informative)
Total determinism was an ancient dream of science that proved wrong. Einstein was the last of the "titans" to believe in it. The quantum physics guys demolished that dream.
At the quantum level, everything is a probability. It's just that things play out in such a way that, at a macro level, the Universe appears to be deterministic. But that's just an emergent property of a probabilistical foundation.
But i agree with you that psychic phenomena should not be rejected outright, based on present day's scientific dogma.
Re:Jon Ronson: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh please. It's not like this was a Guardian editorial. Charlie Brooker, the author of said column, is a humorist and comedian, for fuck's sake. And one who enjoys winding up the easily offended, at that. Occasionally he goes right to the edge - such as when he got an issue of PC Zone magazine pulled from the shelves of the UK's largest chains of newsagents for a comic strip called 'Cruelty Zoo' - bu