How Sony's HD Audio Player Falls Short 359
Mr_Silver writes "Sony's new MP3 based HD player (the snappily titled NW-HD3) is reviewed over at head-fi.org. Unfortunately it can't remember where you last were located when browsing, you can't list all the songs by an artist, 1.5 hours to transfer 2100 songs (instead of the iPod's 15 minutes) and a wall of noise in the output. Final conclusion? 'If there was a way I could return this thing, I'd do it in a second.' So close, yet so far." Update: 12/14 00:35 GMT by T : Not quite so fast: As
forums.minidisc.org Administrator Christopher MacManus writes, it turns out that (as the threads below this review reveal), "The reviewer
discovers that the unit he had is defective as someone else employs one
and there is no hiss issue. Furthermore, the software woes he
experienced are related to him employing JAPANESE software on an English
operating system. Sonicstage 2.3, which he needs to use the unit, is now
available in English."
what were these guys thinking? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:2)
I know, and it doesn't look like Microsoft is getting any better...
wait, whats that? Oh, I'm sorry! Wrong company! Never mind!
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:4, Insightful)
-- A Sony Employee
It's a real shame (Score:3)
They had other, great, intersting (remember the electronic picture frame?) and innovative products. But that's quite some time ago.
Since Sony purchased CBS and Columbia pictures this company went apeshit.
It nowadys seems to be run by a bunch of paranoid, MBA'd marketing droids with neither a knack for innovation, nor
Re:It's a real shame (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh, they know what the customer (what the Suits call the "consumer" or "cash cow") wants. They just decide that, because the lawyers are jumping up and down and screaming blue murder and the media sorts are having aneurysms over letting the unwashed masses actually use the stuff they by in the way they want, the customer can't have it.
Sony's engineers are still
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:5, Insightful)
It blows my mind that mp3 player developers think the user is so stupid that a simple copy and paste is beyond them, thus they must help them will these badly done client apps.
The worst is the Neuros. If an mp3 doesnt have an ID3 tag, it wont even show it in the damn "mp3 browser" part of the client software. Its exactly like the file doesnt exist. You have to find that file and manually edit the ID3. There's not even a n "unknown songs" category so I can do this in the client by looking at the filename. Not to mention, the only way to add songs is to use the client. If you copy a file over via USB, the device can't see it until the client updates its little database.
I hear people complain about their client software all the time. Crashes, too slow, etc. Do they even still make devices that act like hard drives?
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:2)
Use NDBM [sf.net], a
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:3, Informative)
the Beatles
the beatles
The beatles
The Beatles
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:4)
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:2)
Although the smarter companies are catching on. I just bought an iRiver player that has a UMS firmware available on-line. To a PC it just looks like a portable thumbdrive. Now I just drag and drop songs in the file browser.
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:4, Insightful)
1) Must play Oggs
2) Must work with Linux
3) Must be durable and reliable
4) Must have at least 20GB
Ideally, I'd like to have a player that has the following features:
5) Can upgrade hard drive to larger capacity, using a standard (laptop probably) hard drive, not an overpriced special-order one from the manufacturer
6) Can connect to home network by ethernet
7) Can connect to stereo with SPDIF and RCA jacks
8) Doesn't require funky, annoying software to transfer new files (though optional software for extra functionality is ok, as long as it runs on Linux). As an addendum to this, can be used as generic HDD storage device when connected via USB.
Most players fail miserably on requirement #1. The Rio Karma seems to come the closest to meeting most of my requirements, and actually inspired several of them with its innovative dock which has ethernet and RCA jacks. However, a simple google search will show that it has an absolutely terrible reputation for reliability; I've never seen an item with so many people complaining about it breaking. Apparently, it has a problem with the hard drive dying, and its ultra-short warranty period doesn't help here. So for all its nifty features, it fails to meet basic requirement #3.
Maybe I should design my own MP3 player and market it, much like the guys at SlimDevices did with their very successful SliMP3. However, since there are already established players in the market, it's unlikely I'd be able to compete effectively against them, especially when so few people actually care about getting products that are durable and reliable these days, and would rather buy something with a fancy brand name.
I predict this Sony MP3 player will be very successful, even though it doesn't work worth a damn. There's millions of consumers out there who would happily shell out big bucks for a piece of moldy bread if it just had a Sony emblem on it.
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:5, Informative)
1,2,3,4,8 it satisfies.
5 I spose you can do, but it's not a standard HD.
6 Not by ethernet, but if you connect via USB it just shows up as a normal harddrive, so you can do what you want from there
7 No, but it has standard mini out (obviouslly, plus optical out... so really you're all set there)
mp3 software _can_ be better (Score:3, Interesting)
This is especially true if you stay in iTunes-land: You rip your CDs with iTunes or buy songs from the ITMS and it automatically adds all the correct ID3 name tags. iTunes doesn't deal well with missing ID3 tags - it will just plop everything in the "unknown artist" category.
Why is iTunes better? iTunes provides a database of music and keeps the files organized on the disk in the background for you. I would naturally ass
Re:what were these guys thinking? (Score:3, Insightful)
In fact, further down that thread, someone says their own unit doesn't have the hiss. This is the only showstopper I really see here.
HD = hard disk (Score:2, Informative)
Damn two letter acronyms in article summaries.... I was wondering what MP3 had to do with high definition.
HD == hard disk, in this context
I'm glad newspaper reporters don't write this poorly yet.
It takes.... (Score:5, Insightful)
How do things like this make it past q&a? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How do things like this make it past q&a? (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Sony? Rush? (Score:2)
The reason is usually ego. It effects everyone no mater how smart they are, usually the smartest one have the biggest ego. So when the request goes to the guy who came with the unpopular design his ego gets in the way he will naturally get defensive towards the change. It happens every where things like vi vs Emacs, Linux vs xBSD. People don't want to show that they made a mistake and will hide the mistake.
Re:Sony? Rush? (Score:2)
Re:Sony? Rush? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Sony? Rush? (Score:2)
Am I the only one that thought a controller thats actually bigger than your hand was a good idea?
Re:Sony? Rush? (Score:2)
Re:How do things like this make it past q&a? (Score:2)
Only Advantage (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Only Advantage (Score:4, Informative)
4th gen charging (Score:5, Informative)
Just be sure you dismount the thing or it will continue to run and suck juice.
Re:Only Advantage (Score:2)
Re:Only Advantage (Score:2)
Sony, can't even get MP3 right! (Score:2)
Re:Sony, can't even get MP3 right! (Score:3, Informative)
Uh-oh (Score:5, Funny)
Now I've done it; I've doomed the thing to be wildly successful!
Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2, Interesting)
On the adjacent page I see that these tracks only cost me $0.99/each
My math says that's $14,850 to fill the thing up.
I've only got a hundred or so albums and it would be nice to carry them around with me, but getting them into the IPOD or SONY HD3 or whatever and indexing, is a royal PIT@. Going out and finding all that music and buying it AGAIN at the 99 cent music store is also a PITW (pain in the wallet).
Why the hell
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2)
there are many CD ripping apps out there that will rip/encode your cds and fetch track info from the net... then copy it to your player... I ripped all my albums in a factory line one afternoon...
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2)
I prefer to do it with shell-scripts and then add the track information using a Perl script that fetches the information from..... Amazon.com.
Bwa ha ha! The irony!
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2, Informative)
As for CDs, I've got 1.6 days of music on my iPod without giving the iTunes music store a cent.
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2)
I'll admit it is harder than just getting it online, but it may be worth it to save your vinyl some wear. This method also has the benefit of allowing you to record copy-protected CDs, digital music channels on TV, and radio if you c
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2)
Yeah, I'll bet it's possible to get sound quality approaching a CD with a good player and fairly unscratched vinyl, but it's no pushover.
Speaking personally, if you're talking about ripping a whole album that's available on CD at a decent price, it's probably better to buy the CD. I've ripped vinyl before; my time might have worked out sl
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:4, Informative)
Cdex [sourceforge.net] or EAC [exactaudiocopy.de] are the two apps I'm most familiar with (stay away from MusicMatch, it's bloated beyond belief) and I'm sure someone else can offer even more options. Both of these programs will rip/encode (into FLAC, LAME MP3, or Ogg Vorbis)/tag in a single click of the mouse. As long as you've got a web connection they'll look up the tag information via CDDB and even set up your ripped files into a directory structure (artist/album/ or year/artist/album or
I don't know if it's any harder to transfer these files to an iPod than the AAC's you get off iTunes, but I haven't heard any complaints about it so I'm sure it's intuitive enough. Personally, I prefer my Rio Karma [digitalnetworksna.com] for its vorbis/flac support as well as gapless playback (even on MP3's, which don't natively support gapless playback).
Heck, most players (not my Karma, but I digress) are recognized as external USB hard drives (via MSC, so they should even work on Linux) nowadays. All you have to do is drag and drop your MP3's onto the disk (possibly a specific directory, but still no big deal).
Anyway, I'm rambling.. Bottom line is, ripping your CD collection is terribly easy, and with hard drive prices what they are, you really have no reason NOT to back up your collection (FLAC is best for archiving purposes, once again keeping in mind that storage is dirt cheap these days).
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2)
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2)
MSC support *was* promised in a future firmware update, but apparently making sure all of the RioDJ features work properly is taking some time (or it's been dropped, who knows).
I like Rio
Re:Here is the bit I don't quite get... (Score:2)
It would work just fine. Once the music is ripped to MP3, drop it into your iTunes library and transfer it to the iPod from there.
However, it would be quicker to use iTunes itself to rip your music into your choice of formats (AAC, MP3, AIFF, WAV, or Apple Lossless). iTunes will also grab the track info from CDDB and organi
control (Score:3, Insightful)
I just can't believe how this got past the door isn't market research meant to prevent really stupid products like this
sony can make awesome electronic gear its just the donuts in head office and other depts shoot them selves in the foot
Re:control (Score:5, Insightful)
I might add that your comment also applies to music industry in general. The RIAA can point fingers in various directions as to why they aren't making the growth numbers to which they've become accustomed. But it's the same story
Reason for purchase? (Score:5, Informative)
Hmm. The iPod puts out fairly accurate low end when its hooked up to a stereo. Sounds to me like mavis had a problem with the headphones and decided to fix it in a rather too drastic manner. Ah, the curse of the early adopter who is influenced by the lure of the shiny new toy.
The poster does mention trying new headphones with the iPod (near the end of the "review"), but fails to say if they made a difference. The implication is that they didn't. Maybe this is because the iPod is missing a simple "bass boost" button (something which is far from lacking, between equalization and the desire for many people to listen to music without significant alterations)? Then again, this was written by a self-proclaimed bass-head non-audiophile...
Hmm. Sounds like a pretty solid vote for "not recommended" to me...
Re:Reason for purchase? (Score:4, Interesting)
http://www.modeemi.fi/~vesas/iPod_Audio.pdf
iPod settings like "Bass Booster" increase the level at 20Hz by up to 6dB relative to the midrange. In practice, with even remotely accurate headphones this amount of EQ makes for incredibly overblown bass. I question whether anyone who finds this insufficient is qualified to make an audio quality judgement about anything.
I personally find the "Electronic" setting on the iPod to be the only useful one that boosts the low bass a bit without totally destroying the music you're listening to. It's about a +/-1.5dB countouring emphasising low frequencies while cutting back around 300Hz and 7KHz where a lot of headphones (and MP3 files!) are a bit rough anyway.
What about output impedance? (Score:2)
For example the output of the Archos Jukebox 6000 had overly small capacitors which limited bass. There is a mod [comcast.net] that fixes this.
Re:Reason for purchase? (Score:3, Interesting)
Yeah, but he was complaining about the iPod not having the power to drive his headphones, not his stereo (in which case it would be docked). Many an audiophile would agree that those preset "equalizer" settings aren't nearly precise enough to properly drive a larger set of Cans..
In fact, here's a graph [dapreview.net] that shows the problems that low impedance headphones can have when driven by an iPod (or similar DAP, in this case the iPod was us
iPod is one of the best portables sound-wise (Score:3, Interesting)
Sigh... (Score:2, Interesting)
Granted, the 2100 song transfer was all mp3's, which is likely being wrapped in some DRM on the device and not the native ATRAC3plus format. Regardless, I agree that
Re:Sigh... (Score:5, Insightful)
Every time I go to a friend's house.
Re:Sigh... (Score:2)
I have 70 GB of music of my own (~40% legitimate if you care) and considering something like a 40GB iPod is out my range (but the 20GB isn't), and then considering that my mom or sister will want some of their stuff on it if we are travelling... I'd say about once a week on average.
Re:Sigh... (Score:2)
I had it for a week before returning it and getting an Ipod.
Not mentioned in review or post... (Score:3, Informative)
Of course this still doesn't excuse sony's production of such an obviously crippled device. It has great potential, but will never work so long as sony is also a record company.
Someone please review the DCube. (Score:2)
I want to get one [nextway.co.kr] but it's just expensive enough that I don't want to go in blind. Haven't seen any real reviews (resellers own [mp3way.co.uk] doesn't count).
Did he actually get... (Score:5, Funny)
I wonder if the reviewer made an honest mistake and actually received a genuine Sorny product. Anyway, I would have went with a Panaphonics.
minidisc much worse than sony's hdds. (Score:5, Informative)
Minidiscs (Net-MD and HI-MD) do have many issues such as:
- ATRAC only.
Compress your compressed mp3s into Atrac. Noticable Quality Loss. If you want to preserve the quality, then record LIVE (SP-Mode) like a cassette but do we really have time to do that?
Compress = lose time = quality loss = why?!?
- Cheap built quality.
Sony tends to make the higher-priced models built to last longer using material like magnesium unlike plastic of the lower-end models. It makes some sense I guess since it costs more but for a company like Sony, the company who ruled in the era of Walkmans (god those things were solid), I find it sad how the tables have turned. Walkmans used to take major beatings and they'd still function.
- slow transfer.
because of conversion and because it doesn't mearly use the potential of usb 2.0. Very abysmal on NET-Md's. On HI-Md's, they try to impress you with "100X" when in fact that's 500kb/s of burning speed.
I'm glad that Sony at least understood that it will take mp3 playback capability to at least compete in the market of portable audio players but they are already behind, way behind in the western countries and have a long way. They have to improve the software these players use (SonicStage has a horrible interface and barely enough features) and built quality of these players.
I'l sum this up by saying that I just wish Sony could build their future players like they used to with the Walkmans: Built to last.
Re:minidisc much worse than sony's hdds. (Score:2)
They did?! All it took was 1 trip to the beach to ruin a perfectly fine Sony walkman.
Re:minidisc much worse than sony's hdds. (Score:4, Funny)
I had a really nifty Walkman my old man got straight from Sony in Japan when he toured their facility for some big B2B deal.
It was no bigger than a cassette tape holder, had built in retractable headphones, one touch fforward and rewind.. Really really slick and packed with features. As high-end a portable product as Sony made at the time.
And it broke into a million pieces when it fell out of my hand into my lap. My lap, not the hard floor, it fell about 8 inches and landed in my lap and fell apart.
Built to last my ass. The two dollar knockoff walkman I got at radio shack ran circles around that high-end piece of shit.
Re:minidisc much worse than sony's hdds. (Score:2)
While I have to agree that not being able to get data back off the player and the wait time while recording sucks, I have to say it has been the most reliable thing ever. Once I record a CD to MiniDisc in LP1 format, it's there, and I can't tell the difference from source CD no matter how hard I listen. Also, t
Apple's Edge (Score:5, Insightful)
1) a sleek, feature rich MP3 player;
2) sleek, intuitive software to run on the player; and
3) sleek, intuitive software to interface with it.
(and optionally a sleek music store to interface with it)
For those who belittle Apple's achievement or dismiss their market success as "clever marketing," the failure of Sony and others to basically get their engineering shit in order should be more than telling: apparently, creating a great MP3 player really is hard.
Re:Apple's Edge (Score:2)
in Apple a great idea is looked at from all angles, comprise is very little as only the best is done.
I highly don't Sony's employee's are that motivated.
Also note the time it takes to transfer files. Firewire to usb?
Re:Apple's Edge (Score:3, Insightful)
1) Poor battery life
2) Poor format support (Vorbis? FLAC?)
3) Poor playback (no EQ, no Gapless playback)
4) Poor feature set (No FM, no voice recorder, nothing that sets it apart features-whys)
5) Still more expensive than most other players
It's a fine player for your average music listener, but it's hardly the geeky plaything a DAP can (and IM(Geeky)O should
And it doesn't run Linux either (Score:2)
Oh wait...
http://www.ipodlinux.org/index.php/Main_Page
Re:Apple's Edge (Score:3, Insightful)
2) Again, how many people -- Slashdotters excluded -- do you know who give a rat's asshole about Ogg or FLAC? Thought so.
3) No EQ? WTF? It has EQ. Did you not see the "EQ" part of the settings? Gapless playback I'll give you, though.
4) FM, eh, wh
Re:Que? (Score:2)
An iPod Convert (Score:5, Insightful)
"Oh, here is another over priced piece of Apple crap", I thought. And that time, I might have been right. I am not an Apple fan by nature.
I bought a 20 GB player from another company, and liked it well enough.
Earlier this year, I had the chance to get $100 off one of the new 4th gneration iPods. I decided on the 20 Gb to replace the brick that was my MP3 player.
I have never looked back.
My iPod is easily the best gadget (or maybe even technology item, period) that I have ever purchased. I love it. My life is now filled with music and audio books.
What I really don't get is how a company like Sony can fall on its face over, and over, and over. Seriously, can't Sony, f@cking Sony, figure out how to make a cool gadget to compete with iPod? Seriously, nothing I have tickered with at WorstBuy (tm) or CircuitCrapy (tm) from Sony even comes close to the ease of use and pure coolness that I have with my iPod.
As a software developer, I really don't get how a company that is often on or ahead of the curve like Sony and continue to f@ck it up!
Apple is in strange territory. Many times the first to market is also to far ahead of the market that they fail. This is not the case with the iPod, and Sony needs a huge shift in engineering and attitude if they want to even attempt to catch up.
Re:An iPod Convert (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously, can it really be that hard? Elsewhere some people have so suggested, but honestly? Really? Are Apple that clever?
It staggers me that Sony have taken this long to come out with something, and when they do, it is virtually insulting. This product is, quite frankly, turd. (I speak from experience - I had the misfortune of tryin to use one in Japan in a shop - I failed dismally.)
Sony rocked the world with the Walkman. Now they're getting their asses whipped by the likes of Creative, iRiver and so on.
It truly is absurd.
iqu 8s
(To the parent: next, get an Apple laptop. You can get more of that warm fuzzy feeling - that completeness - that your iPod gives you. I bought an iPod, then made the switch, and have never looked back.)
Re:An iPod Convert (Score:2, Funny)
CircuitShitty (tm), surely?
Re:An iPod Convert (Score:3, Insightful)
(1) They want to control the file format. Not-invented-here syndrome. Like Adobe, they're very technologically arrogant. At one time, this was a motivational tool for Sony managers to use with their engineers; now, it's outmoded B.S outside of the PlayStation and televisions.
(2) They own a large amount of content (Sony Records/Sony Pictures), so they want to institute DRM -- remember that Sony was originally a champion of fair use with the Betamax, successfully going to the Supre
Why Can't Sony Compete? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Why Can't Sony Compete? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think you might be onto something there. I wonder how much pressure there is from Sony Music, and the rest of the RIAA behemoth, on the rest of Sony to cripple anything dealing with digital music/audio. Making a portable digital music player these days that doesn't play MP3, WMA, or AAC and forcing their own crappy proprietary DRM'ed codec on people is just plain dumb.
The RIAA is really a bunch of dinosaurs and I derive great satisfaction from watching non-music-industry companies (and the Open Source
it's the naming convention, stupid (Score:5, Insightful)
Ah, the NW-HD3; so easy to remember. I can hear it now:
"Mom and Dad, I really really want a Sony NW-HD3 this holiday season!"
Never mind sending Mom and Dad to the mall with that kind of information just invites holiday disappointment. The real problem is that Sony makes ten trillion different pieces of consumer electronics, all of which are named just as idiotically. KD-36XS955, HDR-FX1, DSC-F828 -- these are all real products I pulled off the Sony website. Do you have any clue what they are?
Contrast this with the branding Apple pulled off after Jobs returned: they went from having a confusing line of Performa 5200s, Performa 6300s, PowerMac 7200s, Powermac 8500s, PowerBook 1800s (etc. etc. the list goes on) to having three easily explainable product lines: iMacs, PowerMacs and PowerBooks and now iBooks and iPods. Easy. "Mom and Dad, I want an iPod". Done.
Granted this creates another set of problems (for tech support and repair shops especially) but overall the effect dramatically reduces consumer confusion dramatically. Why can't Sony and other electronics manufacturers learn from this lesson?
~jeff
Re:it's the naming convention, stupid (Score:5, Interesting)
Without looking, I know the DSC-F828 is a camera. I would guess that the KD-36XS955 is a TV (with the 36 indicating screen size.)
With cars, the opposite of what you noted is true. Honda used to name its Acura line of cars with names (Integra, Legend, Vigor, etc.). Their marketing experts didn't like that. They realized that buyers of high-end autos refer to the cars by brand, not by model, because the model was a series of numbers. I.e., a person buys a BMW or a Mercedes, not a 540iL or a E320 4Matic. But Acuras buyers refer to their cars as an Integra or a Legend, not as an Acura. To build brand identity, they changed the naming to initials (RSX, TSX, etc.). The goal is to get people to say they bought an "Acura," instead of a Legend, without reference to the manufacturer.
Chevrolet has the opposite problem with the Corvette. Chevrolet is known as a budget brand, but the Corvette is a $40+k sports car. So they minimize use of the name Chevrolet with the word Corvette.
Re:it's the naming convention, stupid (Score:2)
I dont know (Score:5, Insightful)
It's always the software portion. First it was the customized software drivers on their PCs which did less than the generic drivers. Then there was the net MD crap they forgot to tell you they had to convert all the files to atrac on your HD first and that up to 64X speed meant everyone got around 1.3X speed. Then their memorystick format didn't support sizes over 256mb - hence the 'pro' version. Funny NO OTHER flash format needed any upgrades from the first 8MB card to the 4GB cards.
How could this biased article be posted? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:How could this biased article be posted? (Score:2, Informative)
Who cares about hiss, can you browse by artist? (Score:4, Insightful)
However - is it accurate you cannot browse by artist? That to me would be enough to disregard it. I use all of the browsing modes on the iPod and wouldn't be happy to loose any of them - to produce a new product without this feature seems insane to me.
Re:How could this biased article be posted? (Score:5, Informative)
What kind of headphones do you have?
In my experience, the more sensitive your headphones, the more you'll pick up the background hiss. Standard earbuds won't get it at all. I have a set of Sony in-ear headphones, the same as the reviewer had, and get slight hiss from the electronics on my Dell. I also have a set of Audio-Technica headphones (one step up from consumer-grade), and on the same output, the hiss from my Dell drives me nuts.
Reviewer was using Shure E5c headphones, which are sensitive. So it's possible that he hears things you don't.
Or maybe he got a dodgy device.
Re:How could this biased article be posted? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:How could this biased article be posted? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:How could this biased article be posted? (Score:3, Insightful)
Ignoring the fact that Sony get what they deserve for shipping a duff device, it is worth pointing out that a lot of the issues he noted would be still around on a "non-defective" device.
Admitidally the wall of sound issue looks to be a device one, however he was using good quality earpho
Can I call for a ban on the use of LOL in reviews? (Score:3, Interesting)
So can I ask for a ban for any review that even thinks about containing 'lol' within it? This one does, has been shown to be a bad review of a defective product, and I think that speaks volumes of someone who would use 'lol' within a piece.
The addendum may not be correct... (Score:3, Interesting)
The original reviewer is employing much higher quality headphones (Shure) than the person who states that he encounters no hiss at all. As well the person in the headfi thread who responds that he has no issues has a different model.
This can mean several things:
1) That the model is particularly sensitive to power line noise.
2) That the better headphones are more sensitive to noise within unit than the lower quality headphones employed within by the other individual.
3) That the model is actually defective.
It does not mean the model 'isn't defective. But the reasons presented within the thread to not 'prove' the model is defective.
Re:In case it's /.'ed -- ugh ugly (Score:4, Informative)
Re:In case it's /.'ed -- ugh ugly (Score:2, Funny)
Stop spamming slashdot.
Re:In case it's /.'ed -- ugh ugly (Score:3, Interesting)
A few players such as this Sony and perhaps the Creative Muvo2 look good on paper, but specs aren't everything. A lot of it also comes down to the UI and how easy it is to use. If I have to scroll through 5G of songs with only a one line display (ala Muvo2) to find one song, you can forget tha
Re:Sony originality draught (Score:2)
I don't know if Sony invented it per se, but they certainly championed it (and I believe, still do)
Re:Sony originality draught (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Sony originality draught (Score:2, Insightful)
Sony make excellent consumer and professional video gear. Their audio gear has always been low-end from the Walkman until today. As far as I can see, they were never aiming at the high-quality market, rather neato gadgets and shiny things.
On the other hand, how 'inventive' can you really be with an mp3 player? Especially when the first criticisms of a new music format or user-interface will be "but it doesn't play mp3" or "it isn
Re:Sony originality draught (Score:2)
Re:Sony originality draught (Score:2)
By 1985, it was already in machines like the ST and Amiga; and I believe they went with that standard because IBM did.
You remember IBM? They used to make PCs.... (reference to the Lenovo story... never mind.)
Re:Mirrordot Link... (Score:2)
Re:Thanks guys. (Score:2)
Re:That's HDD, not HD (Score:5, Funny)
Re:That's HDD, not HD (Score:2, Informative)
HDD, or Hard Disk Drive, tells you what kind of drive it is. It's a "Hard Disk" drive, as opposed to a "Floppy Disk" drive, or a "Tape" drive, or "CD-ROM" drive.
But the "World Wide Web" typically refers to HTTP(S) traffic, while "Internet" refers to the network on which the WWW is built. Therefore it does make some sort of sense to say "Internet Web"