1455401
story
jgwong writes
"Korg's newest keyboard, called OASYS, will run Linux with a propietary software developed by themselves. With a 10.4" touchscreen, CD burner and 16-track HD audio recording this looks pretty neat. No information about availability or price, though."
Keyboard? (Score:5, Funny)
Know what you mean... (Score:4, Funny)
Cords (Score:2)
You fail to understand, it is a cording keyboard. I don't think x.org supports it yet though.
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2)
MIDI is serial (Score:2, Informative)
It's MIDI, which is unidirectional serial at 31.25 kbps with.
Re:Keyboard? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:5, Funny)
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/05/02/18821
http://news.com.com/html/ne/msft_pop.html [com.com]
Beat to the Punch Again! (Score:2)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:5, Funny)
Here is the toilet running Linux [berkeley.edu].
and I can find nothing [slashdot.org] about it on /. (yes I tried several other searches).
[all this talk about toilets....]brb
All well and good... (Score:5, Funny)
Well, with the stability and reliability of Linux, Ashlee Simpson will never make a lip-sync gaffe again!
Re:All well and good... (Score:4, Interesting)
Stable software does not overcome faulty wetware.
Re:All well and good... (Score:2)
Ashlee Simpson will never make a lip-sync gaffe again
I suspect it's more likely that she'll never do a live show again. From now on, all you'll see at her concerts are video screens. Actually, she'd probably love holographic projection (with a time delay for editing) if it ever gets invented.
EricCheck your HTTP headers here [ericgiguere.com]
Re:All well and good... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:All well and good... (Score:4, Insightful)
link [mtv.com]
Re:All well and good... (Score:2)
With today's technology [npr.org], it's no longer necessary to use someone else's work. You don't have to have singing ability to be able to make a studio recording any more.
Re:All well and good... (Score:2)
So it's more than a little pathetic that these "performers" can't even sing live, but not surprising. There's no way you can bounce around like they do and still draw enough oxy
Re:All well and good... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:All well and good... (Score:5, Funny)
On the SI scale of humiliation what Ashlee Simspon did measures about 400 milliVanillis.
But does it run Linux? (Score:3)
Does it record Ogg?
Beowulf? (Score:2)
but does it run...Lin...uhhh... shoot.
But can you put them in a Beowulf cluster for more polyphony or richer effects?
Re:All well and good... (Score:2)
she still can't sing
Doesn't seem to stop anyone else from becoming a "recording artist"! If her sister wasn't famous, she'd be nowhere. Not sure why her sister got famous, though. It's certainly not her brains.
EricArticles and stuff about Java 2 Micro Edition (J2ME) [ericgiguere.com]
Having checked out the promotional video... (Score:5, Informative)
They tout the power of it being based upon a computer, but I think it'll be a few more generations of this before it really makes an impact.
Re:Having checked out the promotional video... (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, well, they're probably using Gnome. Should have gone with KDE instead, or WindowMaker to save memory for the synths.
Be thankful it doesn't just have a command line, or we would be bitching about the default shell used (bash vs tcsh vsh zsh etc).
RE: impact of this synth (Score:3, Informative)
The Triton made a *huge* impact in the music synth scene, with almost every major act wanting to be seen with one on stage or in their studio in photos, etc. I see no reason the Oasys won't be the same - serving as the logical upgrade path for Triton users.
I realize most of the Slashdot readers aren't necessarily that interested in followi
Re: impact of this synth (Score:2)
Re:To which I say "YAY!" (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Considering.... (Score:2)
I still have my Trinity, and I will say that the tabs are probably a very nice improvement. The Trinity, as awesome as it is, does most of its navigation through buttons off to the side. There are tabs, but only for specific pieces of the UI.
As far as "instrument-like" goes, I'm not sure that has ever been the intent of an "electronic" keyboard. Electronic musicians are very very much used to dials and buttons. The tabs are already a dramatic departure from the older analog stuff.
GPL keyboard ? (Score:3, Insightful)
Or will they skip on providing any CDs ?
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:3, Informative)
it does however need to make the source to the GPL software on it easily available. an anonymous ftp server will furfill this requirement. shipping the source code with GPL'd works is not necessary. it just needs to be easily available.
ps. slashbots informed me of this.
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:2)
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:2)
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:2)
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:2)
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:2)
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:4, Informative)
Ahem.
From the GPL, version2.
Re:GPL keyboard ? (Score:2)
As for the actual software doing the syth and interface and everything, that obviously has nothing to do with the kernel so can be under whatever license they want.
"Any third party" (Score:2)
And even if they did modify the kernel, they are only reqired to distribute it to the people that the binary was distributed to
That's true only if the source always accompanies the binary, such as on a CD boxed with each synth. Otherwise, they have to make the offer available to "any third party" [gnu.org].
Re: GPL keyboard ? (Score:3, Insightful)
With the number of open source-friendly folks on Slashdot, it amazes me how often this question turns up in comments. You'd think /. crowd knows what the GPL is, and that most readers would have some basic knowledge about the GPL (and thus, be able to answer above question for themselves).
Never read a single copy of the GPL ?!? Ju
purpose? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:purpose? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
First of all, it sucks enough carrying around a keyboard(s), cords, pedals, amps and a stand. Adding a laptop, powercord, midi cables, etc. on top of that may raise the suckage level enough for some that they would be willing to pay the high price.
My second disagreement is the oxygen8. If it doesn't have 88 keys on it, I don't want anything to do with it. I use every last one of those suc
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
The second to last is full-size and semi-weighted. The last has hammer action! Though it is 600$US.
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
cash is little object to a working professional who needs to get things done, and reliably.
and swapping back and forth between a midiman and a powerbook hardly looks very professional, nor does it make for a fluid show... I know alot of guys who do it both ways. The ones with the big all-in-one keyboards typicall
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
BTW Roadies rarely play with anything backline related, that's why god invetned techs. From my experience, PB's hold up rather well. Go to a large show, 90% of the road crew is using one.
As far as cash, back when the OASYS was conceived, the
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
Basically every night it can be plugged in by a thick as a brick roadie, and it will work and play flawlessly the whole night. Then it can be packed up again by the same roadie and shippe
Roadies (Score:2)
I fear that the OASYS will require boot time, so the idea of turning it on and off, working flawlessly the whole night seems to be a pipe dream.
Piracy (Score:2, Interesting)
This keyboard can't be pirated, in the way that software can. Ergo, there's money to be made. Perhaps you won't get it into the hands of as many people, but at least those people will have actually paid you.
Also, not every musician is a computer geek. I've met quite a few who were terrified by them, even though they were happy getting around equally complex audio hardware.
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
In some cases they are also much ea
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
If you'd've clicked the link I gave, you'd see that the keyboard in question (the one I have, the one I use for live gigs) is small, light and connected via USB. And I write my own software. So.
Basically what I'm saying is the equivalent of those who argue that rolling your own system is c
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
Re:purpose? (Score:2)
Obligatory Oasis joke (Score:3, Funny)
weird (Score:2)
"why would it need a 10" LCD...???"
Re:weird (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Fujitsu might be annoyed (Score:2)
All I Can Say Is ... (Score:2)
Time to upgrade my Roland.
Re:All I Can Say Is ... (Score:2)
Doomed to Fail (Score:3, Insightful)
Modularity is much more popular in recording studios. Buy a Mac Mini and an MBox, and you've still got $3,000 to spend on good mics, a good channel strip, and a decent keyboard controller with MIDI triggered sound collections. Plus you've got a real interface with a decent screen size, without the "benefit" of being locked into a dead-end all-in-one solution. That's why Pro Tools HD systems and Apple Logic Pro setups are in 90% of the studios instead of crappy Roland workstations or Mackie d8bs.
Re:Doomed to Fail (Score:2)
I have to agree. It's the same reason why the TV/VCR or TV/DVD combos aren't a great idea for most people. Do you really want to lose your TV when you send the player out be repaired? I don't think so. Those kinds of devices appeal to a niche market.
EricWhy the Vioxx recall reduced spam [ericgiguere.com]
Re:Doomed to Fail (Score:2)
I was referring to TV + VCR or TV + DVD combos, not VCR + DVD combos.
And yes, I do realize that these things are disposable nowadays [ericgiguere.com].
EricRe:Doomed to Fail (Score:2)
Its meant for a live setting - rugged and much easier to set up than the slapped together rigs I run into all the time. One big box to keep an eye on and pack is less likely to be damaged and lost than a bunch of little boxes full of consumer-ish hardware that wasn't meant for that kind of harsh, smoky, bump and drop environment.
If anyone's curious it runs XP-64 and has 8 gigs of ram in the high end version...
It's 8 frickin' grand... (Score:3, Interesting)
Seriously, the hardware looks nice and all, but you could piece together a comparable system with components for half the cost.
Really.
Re:It's 8 frickin' grand... (Score:2)
They don't understand that the move in studios is to small, cheap, modular systems. Romplers are largely *over*, and so are monolithic synths. Thats why *EVERY* other manufacturer has either gone out of business or to small synths that can integrate with a pc. Couple that with the fact that the OASYS arichitecture is several years old already, and im afraid you have an overpriced p
Re:It's 8 frickin' grand... (Score:4, Interesting)
I actually am a REAL musician and I do make money from my project studio. You do realize it's possible to do that, don't you?
I may not have directly said it in my post, but I'll make it clear: Just because one chooses components over all-in-one units does not make it inferior - particularly when research is done prior to purchase.
Again, Wow. Go outside and take a break or something.
Price (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Price (Score:2)
unbundling (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:unbundling (Score:2)
http://www.korg.com/oasyspci.htm
It bombed, partly because I think it was ahead of it's time.
Re:unbundling (Score:2)
Foot in the door for Linux (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm Still Amazed... (Score:2)
Re:I'm Still Amazed... (Score:2)
Right there with you on that one. The whole reason that I got in to working with computers was so that I could do MIDI sequencing. 15 years later I'm making a living working with the things, as opposed to with my guitars and keyboards, but that's just fine. Being a musician is a crappy way to make a living unless you're on the top of the muckheap anyway.
Linux Pro Audio has come a long way in the last few years, especially with the advent of astounding projects like ALSA, JACK, and Ardour. If only we c
Is it just me... (Score:2)
... or is that little JavaScript-driven hover-scrollbox to read the specs one of the worst information display tools ever?
I want to read the frigging specs, not do the hover-unhover stupid graphic in a miniscule window trick...
Ahh, Sweet Synthesizers (Score:2)
It is nice to know that an important player in the synthesizer biz is starting to use Linux, mainly because I am a lover of Linux and I want to see the technology spread. However, when we're dealing with synthesizers, I cann
Korg... (Score:2)
I was living in England at the time, and me and my band-mates took to hanging out in Cambridge and prowling the music stores looking for deals. I wanted, but could not afford a top of the line Yamaha DX-1 [vintagesynth.org] - so instead settled for a Roland JX-3P [vintagesynth.org]. This was 1983/84 timeframe. Rumor had it that Thomas Dolby acquired his keyboards from the same shop (but that is highly speculative - although interestingly the linked article does mention him - so my machi
This is not really new (Score:3, Informative)
If I was going to get something like this I would probably go this route so I would be able to run my exisitng software - http://www.openlabs.com/
Korg isn't the only one running Linux for audio hardware - http://www.museresearch.com/receptor_overview.php
Being in audio I don't really see the advantages of systems like this over a good PC, control surface and a MIDI keyboard. That is unless you are using it for live gigs.
Korg OASYS.. is this 1994?? (Score:2)
Network with a guitar? (Score:3, Interesting)
This is not unexpected News (Score:5, Insightful)
Basically, the Keyboard People are fucked.
Strike that. They are FUCKED.
Why? As one poster noted above: Software.
Software synthesis already outstrips most anything you can do in a keyboard, and at a much lower cost.
Exhibit A:
REASON [propellerhead.se]
I remember back i nthe ancient 1980s, when a cheezy ass sampler (by todays standards) cost $2000+. In Reason, which costs about $400, you can fill an entire virtual rack with samplers far in excess of what availed then. you want 11 samplers stacked? If you had $25,000 - SURE. In Reason, when you're done, you simply open up a new blank Rack, and fill it with more/other goodies from the drop down menu. Back then, you'd have to sell all those samplers...
It comes with drum machines, samplers, processors, mixers, synthesizers of several different stripes, and on and on.
Second Exhibit: ABLETON LIVE [ableton.com]
This, in combination with Reason, offers truly terrifying amounts of musical development and creativity. Recently, Live was upgraded to include MIDI, and a basic drum machine, so now it is even more deadly as a combo with Reason. Live is a Loop based compositional system, but with its new MIDI capabilities, it is now a much more powerful beast. It costs about $350, IIRC.
Exhibit Three: Max/MSP [cycling74.com]
This, in combination with Live and Reason, makes ANYTHING coming out of Korg pretty much superfluous. With Live and Reason, you have composition systems and tonnes of "Gear". With Max/MSP you make your own gear, and it can be just as weird as you want it to be. Max/MSP isn't a synth, it's a software development environment that resembles an evil cross between Visual Basic and tinkertoys. It's available on Mac and (finally) Windows, and it totally fuckin' rocks. If you wondered how freeks like Autechre [warprecords.com] makes all that jiggety noise, look no further than:
Max/MSP.
so, lets run some totals:
My guess is the Oasys will likely come in around at a $2500 price point.
I often shop at Musicians Friend [musiciansfriend.com] so my prices are from there as of today, Jan 20th. They aren't the best, or the worst. It's just a data point.
Reason: on sale: $199
Ableton Live: $399
Max/MSP with Jitter (video libraries): $799
Edirol PCRA-30 keyboard with Audio In: $299
And a computer I found at PC MALL - an IBM Thinkpad:
Intel P4, 2.8GHz processor, 256MB RAM, 40GB Hard Drive, CD-RW/DVD Combo drive,15" XGA Display, XP-Pro, etc.
Which has PLENTY of power for audio. and it's on sale for $1,198.
So, throw in another hundred bucks for a kbd stand and what not and the total is around:
$2900
Which is probably a bit more than the OASYS will sell for. Since Max/MSP is for Advanced User GEEKS, and Jitter is even geekier, cut the $799 out and you have an entire electronic music studio that KICKS ASS for about $2200.
Now: will your system CRASH? Yes. Will the OASYS? Probably not. If you're worried about that, then get a Powerbook or a Linux Book or whatever-the-fuck-book that flips your crank. They don't Blue Screen as much as Windoze box, but there are other issues involved. All in all, unless you're planning to spend a lot of time on stage, you're better off with the compter based system.
In a few years you will have run through most of what the OASYS does. In a few years... I *shudder* to think what Reason and Live will be like...
Basically Hardware Synth manufactueres are doomed. The only ones who will survive are the ones making the uber-geek analogue gear, and they will basically be little more than boutique operations for purists.
RS
Re:This is not unexpected News (Score:3, Interesting)
Peace
vaporware (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2)
And actually, this was my first impression as well. Here I was, imagining a keyboard running a small Linux Kernel with an LCD screen and a gratuitous CD burner. It sounded awesome. Imagine the scripting possibilities if you were running perl inside of your keyboard, with a small touch screen for feedback and possible alternative mouse input.
And then I get to TFA, only to find out it is like the
Re:Keyboard? (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, because Korg is well known for making all those *other* keyboards.
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Keyboard? (Score:2)
I thought it was Klingon! I zipped right on in here ready with Enterprise-messed-up-history-again trolls.
Re:Is this really in the spirit of the GPL? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes! Celebrate! If they have made changes to the kernel they will have to release them and, hopefully, there will be something of benefit to other Linux audio projects in there. Even if they didn't make any changes, it is a major pro-audio component maker embracing Linux. We need more pro-audio software and hardware support for Linux. I hate it that I have to use Windoze to do postprocessing on recordings that I make, there's no reason Linux can't support VST plugins and (usable) low latency audio.
Re:Is this really in the spirit of the GPL? (Score:2)
No technical reason. The question is: Is the customer base big enough to support the development cost? Chicken and egg, yadda yadda yadda.
(For the record, I'd like to see better Linux support for the 3D stuff I do for a living. So please, don't feel my comment is meant to be a poke at Linux. I just know that unless it's an OSS effort, Linux needs a larger user base to get this sort of support.)
Re:Is this really in the spirit of the GPL? (Score:2)
It sure is. One can presume it's merely running on Linux as an OS and that they have built their own hardware drivers.
There are plenty of closed source drivers for Linux, and and plenty of closed source programs that run on Linux. Why is this any different?
Re:The site sucks (Score:2)
Interesting.. they have an image with no alt attribute on there page. Do they not use there own browser?