



New Slackware Handbook Released 24
Rob_Ogilvie writes "Alan Hicks and his team have finished revising the old 'Slackware Essentials' book and have now released a new and not outdated version for all you Slackware users out there. The old book was getting to be quite outdated, being a few years old. For those of you who like dead trees, this new version is available for pre-order now, in dead-tree format."
By the way.. (Score:1)
I do like his work on Slackware
Re:By the way.. (Score:1)
Apparently the worst is over, and he has since released 10.1. Slackware just keeps getting better and better.
I'm starting to get the impression... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I'm starting to get the impression... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:slackware's cutting edge offerings: (Score:4, Informative)
cfdisk is provided and has been for quite some time, and X.org has been included since 10.0. A simple X -configure generates a good config for many machines. Your claims are more or less baseless.
First Post? (Score:3, Funny)
Here's a hint (Score:3)
Re:Here's a hint (Score:2)
See, this is why tabbed browsing is bad! MS is right! Bad!
Ok, I think I'm getting silly from hunger now. Byenow.
Book is insuficient (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Book is insuficient (Score:3, Informative)
That's not a bug; it's a feature. Seriously.
The book isn't intended for a file and print server admin. It's intended to introduce newbies to GNU/Linux in general, and Slackware in particular. If you're already capable of running your own file and print server, you're probably past the scope of the book.
Re:Book is insuficient (Score:1)
It seems to me that Slackware's biggest strength is in its simplicity, in so far as the user finds very few unnecessary hurdles in the way of finding out for himself how to get something set up. I'm unlikely to refer to it myself, but then I've been using Slack since it was SLS.
Sure, the book may be insufficient for some, but given the apparent revival of interest in Slackware, it is probably timely.
New? (Score:1)
Re:Wow (Score:1)
So? Slackware is a distro with a staff of one. It is probably that which makes it so solid. Pat probably doesn't have time to futz around with glitzy webpages, and I for one am content that he doesn't bother.
I see no particular advantage in a triumph of form over content; the webpage reflects the simplicity of the distro. All the page has to say is who the distro might benefit and where to get it.
Huh? (Score:1)
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
Well, there's info. But the best thing I can say about info is that it's almost always possible to avoid it.
Re:Slackware, the only true distro. (Score:1)
Thanks (Score:2, Interesting)
Forgive me if this has come up a zillion times already since, while I knew of the project, I hadn't followed