Dissecting Songs Down to Their 'Musical Genome' 368
Carl Bialik from the WSJ writes "The company Pandora Media takes a different tack for its online music-recommendation service. When you tell Pandora a song you like or have bought, it doesn't mine its sales database for records of other purchases by those who have bought the song. Instead, it looks for songs with a similar musical profile, based on a database of 300,000 songs rated on up to 400 characteristics like rhythmic syncopation, vamping and vocal harmonies. To analyze the songs, Pandora has hired Bay Area musicians like San Francisco jazz guitarist Bob Coons. 'When Mr. Coons describes a particular song, he uses phrases like the "complexity of the chromaticism" and "richness of the harmonic structure." He has studied the chord structure in Britney Spears' "Oops I Did It Again," and reports that it is "actually fairly complex," ' the Wall Street Journal Online reports."
B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:5, Funny)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:3, Interesting)
I hate Britney's music as much as the next guy - perhaps more owing to my BFA - Music/Recording degree.
But while being subjected to my young girls' favorite CD (Kids Bop #whatever), I was listening to Oops. As it was a remake, I wasn't, *ahem* visualizing Britney, and I heard the song for what (or whatever) it really is.
And as pop goes, it really isn't badly written at all. The phrasing matches the lyr
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2, Informative)
If you view it as an engineering problem, the entire song is layer upon layer of instruments and synthesized beats built on top of one another. To make all the components fit together, would of course be complex.
The article refers to the main fact that the music itself, the bass lines, etc. are very complex, not the fact that the lyrics are compelx.
On a side note, wouldn't something like this be much easier to analyze with a computer, something akin to Wolfram's Ringtone engine, except in reve
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2, Interesting)
Actually, Dweezil and Ahmet Zappa did a heavy version of "Baby One More Time" on the Ready to Rumble [musicbrainz.org] soundtrack, and I'll be darned if it doesn't kick quite a bit of butt as well.
Maybe the problem with Britney's music isn't the musi
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2)
Phil
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:4, Interesting)
breasts.
* - Obligatory Breast Reference
Nice? Only sometimes [liquidgeneration.com],
apparently!
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:5, Interesting)
I may not personally think very highly of Britney Spears as an artist or performer, but her arrangers/composers know their shit and write some pretty robust stuff. Another example is Autumn Goodbye, which has even more complex chords, lots of counterpoint, etc.
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:3, Informative)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:5, Funny)
Whatever you do, DO NOT let Mr. tally man tally your bananas, people. You only have to make it 'till daylight.
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Martin [wikipedia.org]
He also wrote songs for Ace of Base, Backstreet Boys, Celene Dion, Kelly Clarkson, etc...
A lot of pop songs are written to be aurally pleasing, and people usually enjoy complex harmonies (whether or not they realize they are complex). That doesn't make them any better, usually it just makes them sound like soulless corporate music (even though they may be immediately p
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:5, Funny)
Despite of all the other goodies ;) , they completely suck at what they are really suppose to do.
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2)
But vi is sooo much better!
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:5, Funny)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2)
(I still like the faux-Louis version better than Britney though)
Actually it could be complex (Score:3, Funny)
I wonder if the music genome machine will pull up and other louis armstrong as a match.
Re:Actually it could be complex (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Actually it could be complex (Score:3, Funny)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:3, Informative)
Now, try to do the same with a song by JLo or Eminem. Ewww. Would sound worse than Creed.
Mashups (Score:2)
By the way, Eminem actually changes to other styles pretty well. My favorite is probably "Loser Yourself [daughtersoftiresias.org]" (Eminem vs. Beck), although a lot of them work really well (Eminem vs. Prodigy, Eminem vs. the Knightrider theme, etc).
I wonder if the richness of songs makes them harder or easier to blend together. Rap or rap-like groups seems to blend the best (Ice
Re:Mashups (Score:2)
Re:Mashups (Score:2)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:2)
Three years of university, actually. Thanks for asking, mr Coward.
Other things that are complex yet still suck (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:B. Spears Music "Fairly Complex" (Score:5, Informative)
Harmonically complex? For somebody who has never taken a music theory course, maybe. The song is just trivially switching between a minor key and the relative major key, and uses two chords in each. Yeah, if you try to write it out as though it stayed in one key, the notation gets a little ugly, but...:
Minor key: I V I
Relative Major: V I V I
Relative Minor key: V I V I
Relative Major V I
Relative Minor V I
Or, more traditionally:
VI IIIMaj VI
V I V I
IIImaj VI IIIMaj VI
V I
IIIMaj VI
Harmonically complex is Macarthur Park. "Oops" has the harmonic vocabulary of a turnip.
From http://www.ultimate-guitar.com/columns/music_theor y/writing_unusual_and_original_chord_progressions. html [ultimate-guitar.com]
First, I will show one of the simplest (and most common) way that a songs chord vocabulary is extended, is simply by adding the major chords from the keys parallel minor scale....
(Emphasis mine.)
But wati (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:But wati (Score:4, Informative)
Each station gives you the ability to add a few different types of music, but it's not recommended that you try to mix radically different types. You'll have to use old fashioned judgement to choose a broad category you want to listen to, it does the rest of the work exploring similar music.
Re:But wati (Score:2)
Aside from the hair metal, thats fine. Just kidding.
But seriously, I like different styles of music as well, but I don't regularly make a playlist/mix CD that completely crosses all of my music taste. Instead, they are a little more tightly coupled. Maybe that is why this service offers each individual more than one "channel" of music to listen to.
Re:But wati (Score:2)
Easy, symphonic / warrior metal (Score:2)
Re:But wati (Score:2)
The radio stations seem to be based on the search that started them with the "song like this".
Apparently, you can have multiple radio stations, but not one of mixed genres.
But, for a new-cool-music identification route, it's pretty
Re:But wait (Score:3, Insightful)
Britney's Songs (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Good cover of 'did it again' (Score:2)
It works! (Score:2)
Re:It works! (Score:2)
I've been looking for band with a sound like the flaming lips off and on for the last year... it hit on the first try with a song call condition by bleach. sweet.
Re:It works! (Score:2)
I did a search for a couple of songs, and it gave me some interesting suggestions. "Ch-Check It Out" by the Beastie Boys gave a great track, and "E-Pro" by Beck gave some interesting choices. I got kind of excited and started picking out random tracks in my iTunes collection. Then things went awry.
I searched for The Charlatans UK (neglecting to put the UK) and it got me in touch with some '60s band called "The Charlatans" that didn't sound right at all. So I added
Re:It works! (Score:2)
commercial service does similar analysis... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:commercial service does similar analysis... (Score:3, Interesting)
Did you mean Predixis MusicMagic [predixis.biz]... It analyses your MP3s and then makes mixes based on songs you select. They claim to have 8,000,000 songs in their DB. Look for a patent war in this space soon...
Regards
-Jeremy
I have started a similar project. (Score:2)
Wow! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wow! (Score:2)
That's funny. I typed in "tape hiss" and got both her and Milli Vanilli.
I'm a musician.. (Score:5, Informative)
The best part is that you can ask it "Why are you playing this song", and it will explain it to you.. in terms of the song structure and things like that.
These are real people analyzing these songs.. this seems like a great service to find new music from bands you don't know. Taking bands out of the context of a "social circle" (like Amazon and itunes do by simply looking at 'people who purchased this also purchased...') is a GREAT idea.
I urge you to support this project if you are a music lover, or at least check it out and listen for a couple hours.
Re:I'm a musician.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I'm a musician.. (Score:2)
10-hour free trial (Score:2)
Re:I'm a musician.. (Score:2)
I'm not a musician, but I do listen to pretty obscure electronic music.
I was shocked that it not only knew the artist I entered (Karsh Kale), but that, as you say, I'm suddenly listening to a custom radio station with
Re:I'm a musician.. (Score:2)
Re:I'm a musician.. (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't understand that. Why would th
Worth checking out (Score:2)
Huh... (Score:2)
I'm impressed. Particularly since the songs it picked are either songs in very different genres or songs I haven't heard of and liked.
CounterpointTheSurrealismOfTheUnderlyingMetaphor (Score:5, Funny)
"Yes, do continue ..." invited the RIAA executive.
"Oh ... and er ... interesting rhythmic devices too," continued Coons, "which seemed to counterpoint the ... er ... er ..." He floundered.
Ford leaped to his rescue, hazarding "counterpoint the complexity of the underlying chromaticism of the ... er ..." He floundered too, but Coons was ready again.
"... humanity of the ..."
"RIAAnanity," Ford hissed at him.
"Ah yes, RIAAnanity (sorry) of the singer's publicity-whored-out soul," Coons felt he was on a home stretch now, "which contrives through the richness of the harmonic structure to sublimate this, transcend that, and come to terms with the fundamental dichotomies of the other," (he was reaching a triumphant crescendo ...) "and one is left with a profound and vivid insight into ... into ... er ..." (... which suddenly gave out on him.) Ford leaped in with the coup de grace:
"Into whatever it was the song was about!"
The RIAA executive stood up.
"No, well you're completely wrong," he said, "I just write top 40 music to throw my mean callous heartless exterior into sharp relief. I'm going to throw you off the ship anyway. Guard! Take the prisoners to number three airlock and throw them out!"
"...counterpoint the complexity of the underlying chromaticism..." He considered this for a moment, and then unplugged the iVog with a grim smile. "Death's too good for them," he said.
Re:CounterpointTheSurrealismOfTheUnderlyingMetapho (Score:2)
I have a Britney Spears complex.. (Score:2)
Not bad! (Score:3, Insightful)
As to questions about "what if you like both foo and bar styles?" You start with one song or band, and it makes a "channel" out of that type. If you want to explore a different genre, I assume you start over.
It's also full songs, decent quality.
Overall, pretty nice.
Offers same suggestions as Amazon... (Score:2)
Nothing is art unless it is 100% original (Score:2, Interesting)
Why stop at music? Why not go into visual arts as well? They too have too many similarities that can not be overlooked.
At this logic, Claude Monet, Pierr
sorry for the lame attempt at humour (Score:2)
Sounds like a plan, but... (Score:3, Interesting)
Cool.
A problem -- there is no way they will be hiring enough professionals to grade every song out there that I might be interested in. If they get a sufficient following, I see labels paying to have their songs indexed... good luck to the independent musicians out there.
I would hope that they allow people to assign their own weights to different criteria. This is a major problem with most of the automated referral systems. The "people who have bought this also bought X" model doesn't work for me, because my tastes are different from most people... or so I'd like to believe.
What I'd like to see is a cross-genre analysis of the music that is reviewed. I don't like Pop Country -- so how do I find the Bluegrass I want without weeding through what I consider to be junk?
Re:Sounds like a plan, but... (Score:3, Informative)
Music Cataloging by another name (Score:2, Interesting)
This sort of analysis might be used in copyright infringment cases as well as looking for new a
Not surprising really... (Score:2)
I'm not all that surprised really. I don't care for her music but that's personal taste. While I can't speak for her songwriting ability, I do think she has a talented voice. Sadly, too many people think that simply because they do not like something it must suck and anyone who does like it must be stupid. This phenomenon pervades much more of our culture than just music - art a
Studio Musicians (Score:3, Insightful)
Billy
Um..it's matches the music but not the "song" (Score:3, Interesting)
While I can see the similarities in syncopation and tone and music feel, it doesn't match the lyrics or the feel of the song. When I'm in a "Weird Al" mood, it's not a Rembrandts mood. The Kinks, maybe.
Ok, now it's "Tears in the Rain" by Triumph....uh guys...not really...
It's a novelty. If anything it can give you a jumping off point for finding new bands. It might actually be better served in the "Indie" community. Give them the well known band you like, and it gives you all the related Indie music. That I would like.
Sean D.
But that is what I like...Parody... (Score:2)
But it's based on music not content...
Sean D.
Massively off-topic: the art of pop (Score:4, Insightful)
Anyway what I was trying to say that there is in fact some GOOD pop out there now and then. If you want to see the talent behind Britney, you need to look at the names of the producers, engineers, song-writers and musicians on the record. The thing I find most disturbing is the, um, let's call it the "racial dimension", especially in the US where music is sickeningly segregated by colour.
Anyway, miles off-topic, we now return you, etc etc. Sheessh. Does anyone else find Friday evenings profoundly depressing?
Wondering what "Vamping" is? (Score:3, Interesting)
At any rate, I'm impressed. I used to use Amazon to find similar music, but that doesn't really work. If you put in an MTV2 metal band, all the "People who bought this also bought..." links are to more MTV2 metal bands. It's hard to break out of the mainstream.
This, on the other hand, pulled up a bunch of bands that I'm pretty sure don't get commercial *radio play*, much less MTV exposure. Unforetunately, I don't have audio here at work, so I can't speak to the quality of the matches just yet, but I'm sure I'll find something I like that I've never heard of.
NOOOOOOO!!!! (Score:4, Funny)
That's just not right. I think my ears just ran off looking for a new home.
-Tupshin
It could sound like offtopic... (Score:2)
Reminds me of a research project... (Score:3, Interesting)
Knuth on song complexity (Score:3, Interesting)
My favorite part is the end where he references K.C. Sunshine for the song of the least complexity, "That's the way (uh-uh uh-uh) I like it".
Misquote (Score:2)
RIAA and DMCA (Score:2)
Happy User (Score:2)
Combine this with other methods (Score:2)
A 4/4 musical structure and dimwit melody=complex? (Score:2)
Fractals? (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyway, I wonder if songs that are similar in the subjective terms Coons uses would be similar in spectral density or some other mathematical way? It would be really interesting to make automated measurements of songs and see if you could get similar clustering.
Unrelatedly... the article went on to say that the human peripheral nervous system produces white noise, but as you probe closer to the central nervous system the signal becomes more and more fractal, as if the nervous system itself is filtering our raw perceptions and passing a fractal version to our brain. In an experiment with radar scans of a college campus full of people moving around, they found that any one scan was predominantly white noise, but the difference between two scans a second or two apart was fractal noise. They speculated that this might be a key to our ability to process the complex, changing world around us and notice subtle but important details, for example when we immediately notice "something odd" about a person. Fascinating stuff.
I am reminded of... (Score:2)
Bet you they only play RIAA content (Score:2)
What about free music?
beta tester (Score:3, Interesting)
For example, my favorite musician, Ben Folds, had the following characteristics:
Syncopation
Singer / songwriter
Piano lead instrument
Alternative
I then went through and added The Postal Service as a favored artist, then I started getting new flavors added to the mix. Pretty neat.
The hitch comes from the fact that their recommendations aren't always great. You can skip through their recommendations but you're only allowed to do like 6 per hour. To circumvent this, you can rate each song as it's playing (5-point rating system with the highest being "I really like this sound -- play more like this and the lowest being "Don't play anything like this ever again").
It's a fun little app. It's nice to just throw on and leave on all day... a good alternative to cheesy shoutcast stations and it's WAAAAY better than the alternative...... corporate FM crap.
*shudders*
~sj
Re:Complex? (Score:2)
Re:Complex? (Score:2, Informative)
Harmonicly, they are not too complex, but the arrangements and rhythms are quite fierce.
I generally work out the complexity of music by imagining how hard it would be to notate it.
If you were to score a song like 'Oops I did it again', I reackon it would be thirty or so staves for all the different instruments, be around 20-30 pages long, and look nightmarishly complex. It's so easy to track stuff up nowadays that arrangements have got really dense.
Con
Uhh... It's DELERIUM (Score:2)
Re:charactistics... (Score:2)
That particular query will return all the emo-poser bands making loud disimilar sounds to make money and stroke their egos.
Re:Try Satchmo (Score:4, Informative)
You know that's a hoax, right? (Score:2)
Vocals: Shek Baker
Trumpet: Kurt Stockdale
Music: Chris Messick
IE: "We're just pretending it's Louis Armstrong, we really did it."
Er... not really (Score:2)
Re:Try Satchmo (Score:4, Informative)
Britney's also not too bad to look at, but I doubt she'll hold up over the years as well as Kylie Minogue has.
Re:Try Satchmo (Score:2)
Re:Try Satchmo (Score:2)
"Supermasterpiece.com" is a humor site. Therefore, it should be assumed that the alleged Satchmo recording of a Britney Spears song falls into the realm of parody, not that of genuine historical artifact.
"Informative" moderation is incorrect and will be meta-modded as such.
Re:turn off popup blocking? (Score:2, Informative)
What you mean like GMail? (Score:2)
Re:Somebody hunt down their web master and beat hi (Score:2, Informative)
Re:But.. what about performance? (Score:4, Insightful)
While that may be true in certain cases, I think a blanket statement like that is actually pretty far off of the mark. I'll agree that those who analyze creative arts 'too deeply' don't get it--if by not getting it you mean have a appreciation for the structure that's different than a casual interpretation.
I've listened to classical music for decades. I find that although from the beginning I could enjoy pieces and appreciated their form, it was a study of formal music theory that gave me new tools for appreciating what I heard. When I hear a composition from one era and can place how the composer rejected the norms of the previous era I have a different--and I feel deeper--appreciation of the pience than if I am in the dark about certain things.
The same goes for literature. Being aware of the significance of certain workplay brings a much greater understanding than just being able to follow the plot on the surface. When reading Orwell's 1984 being aware of the irony of 'doubpleplusungood' make for a richer appreciation than just thinking "wow, they use odd forms instead of the more mainstream 'bad'". Granted it doesn't take much to analyze the irony of the wordplay, but that analysis creates in the reader a different level of appreciation than not analyzing anything.
I guess my point is that just because one can apply an indepth analysis into the struture of a creative piece does not mean they are unable to appreciate a work at face value anymore. It just gives them more tools which they can apply to appreciation of art.
Re:elitist attitude to popular music (Score:3, Interesting)
As a sometime amateur rock musician, I can attest to this. Rock (excluding things like prog rock and speed metal) is a hell of a lot easier to write, play, and sing than pop. Partially it's because I never listened to enough pop songs in depth to learn how to mentally dissect it properly. I listen to, say, late-70's Aerosmith and I can easily tell what every memb
Um (Score:4, Informative)