1080p, Human Vision, and Reality 403
An anonymous reader writes "'1080p provides the sharpest, most lifelike picture possible.' '1080p combines high resolution with a high frame rate, so you see more detail from second to second.' This marketing copy is largely accurate. 1080p can be significantly better that 1080i, 720p, 480p or 480i. But, (there's always a "but") there are qualifications. The most obvious qualification: Is this performance improvement manifest under real world viewing conditions? After all, one can purchase 200mph speed-rated tires for a Toyota Prius®. Expectations of a real performance improvement based on such an investment will likely go unfulfilled, however! In the consumer electronics world we have to ask a similar question. I can buy 1080p gear, but will I see the difference? The answer to this question is a bit more ambiguous."
IMAX (Score:4, Funny)
The difference is when you get close (Score:2, Funny)
When you press your face up against your HDTV panel, you should be able to tell the difference between 1080p and reality.
If you can't tell the difference between the two, then you might want to get your eyes checked.
I'm sorry, I was told there would be no math (Score:5, Funny)
Analogy (Score:5, Funny)
But it does mean that the performance of the car won't be limited by the tires...
Your target audience... (Score:5, Funny)
If you lean into your honey for a kiss, she doesn't get all pixellated when you get close to her face.
Consider your target audience...
1080p? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The difference is when you get close (Score:5, Funny)
Dude, this is Slashdot. When a Slashdot reader leans into his honey for a kiss, she *does* get pixellated...
Just do this... (Score:1, Funny)
Hey, that's unfair (Score:5, Funny)
Re:People Are Blind (Score:4, Funny)
Re:IMAX (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It isn't that simple. (Score:2, Funny)
And your accusation of redundancy covers my bringing up acuity variations across the eye, the difference between color and luma acuity, the differences between horizontal and vertical acuity, scanning the image as opposed to trying to catch it all in one gestalt along the general theme that distance isn't the entire issue... exactly how?
Oh. You didn't get all that. I'm sorry. I thought you might have been paying attention. My bad.
Re:It isn't that simple. (Score:5, Funny)
The first one knows what he is talking about, and the second guy apologizes for being a bit to harsh in a comment? This is Slashdot, folks. That sort of behavior just is NOT tolerated!
Head on over to Technocrat [technocrat.net] every now and then, will you?
Charles
Re:People Are Blind (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hey, that's unfair (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mom might have been right.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:IMAX (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The difference is when you get close (Score:1, Funny)
Not in 1080p!
Re:Mom might have been right.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Seeing the Grids (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Mom might have been right.... (Score:2, Funny)