Comcast Drops Microsoft 146
Frosty Piss writes "Comcast plans to drop Microsoft's television software and on-screen program guide from its digital cable boxes. The cable company will replace the Microsoft technology with GuideWorks software — Comcast is a part owner of GuideWorks. Comcast has been the lone cable company in the US using Microsoft technology for set-top boxes, and only in the state of Washington, Microsoft's back yard." The Microsoft offering has a solid presence in Latin America. The company is no longer trying very hard to market it here at home.
Linux? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Good riddance (Score:3, Interesting)
Nevertheless, good riddance
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But the "Microsoft Powered" box would take a command (like fast forward) and get stuck for a minute or two,
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Good riddance (Score:5, Informative)
The previous software was cheesy but it had lots of options to customise how you used it. It didn't look pretty but it did a decent job.
I remember when Comcast were advertising that they were changing to the MS software. They claimed it would perform better and would have many great new features. It performs considerably worse, has no new features, and several features of the previous software were not available.
The MS software is really poor. Performance is terrible, navigation is a pain, options that should exist don't and it never does what you think it should.
I'm glad they are changing to something else, it *has* to be better than the MS guide.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Dang!
Re: (Score:1)
FTA:
"Some Comcast customers have encountered glitches when using the cable set-top boxes running the Microsoft software, such as a lack of responsiveness. However, Kipp said there haven't been any out-of-the-ordinary problems, and he said nothing along those lines played into the decision to make the switch.
"Graczyk said some problems were caused by the firmware on the cable devices, which Microsoft doesn't provide. He noted that Communications Technology named Comcast's Washington region overall the "
Re: (Score:1)
Good riddance. Awful interface, very laggy on user interaction. I have it here in Seattle.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
So that explains it (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Before everyone cheers..... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Hold your horses kids (Score:1)
Comcast's software does indeed suck. It is clumsy, slow, and not terribly user friendly. Our cable box stops responding entirely on a r
Guideworks blows (Score:5, Interesting)
Comcast was supposedly talking to Tivo about replacing their Comcast/Guideworks software with the much loved Tivo software. Where is that?
Re: (Score:1)
So does the MS Interface on those Motorola boxes (Score:1)
If I had another choice in the market for High-Def DVR, I'd take it. Anything would be better than Comcast. You hear me, nebulous market forces? I said I'd pay for your service if you offered it. Hearken to the pent up demand.
Why don't I have another good option? Why is your pet option not wh
Re:So does the MS Interface on those Motorola boxe (Score:1)
It is pricey, but it was worth the cost just to ditch the lame ass Comcast DVR
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
if you already pay for movies, geeze, man; how impatient do you have to get? your movie channels will get all your OD movies, sooner or later.
I fail to see how this money-grab called OD is worth anything. mostly, it seems like you pay for movies and then pay AGAIN to get some of them sooner.
what a racket!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you get ESPN HD? Can you record it? Is there a way to get ESPN HD and other HD channels that are not OTA without the Comcast cable box?
Honestly, the initial price for a Tivo Series 3 is very high for me, and is simply not worth it for the amount I watch.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure I understand your question, but I can record, for example, Discovery HD without the use of a cable box.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But not everything is about using the cheapest solution.
Re:So does the MS Interface on those Motorola boxe (Score:2)
Not surprisingly, I sometimes encounter similar issues with Windows MCE. Thankfully I only use that for watching TV in HD or for watching the occasional downloaded video, so it's not like I deal with it on a daily basis. My TiVo doesn't do this, though...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The Time Warner sticker placed over the Comcast imprinted logo on my box was a nice touch though. I'd love for more choice in cable or the
Re: (Score:2)
TiVO: Because our stuff is better? Isn't it normal to pay for value?
Comcast: Not when you value fucking people over! So I guess you'll just have to go fuck yourselves, you selfish bastards.
TiVO: Wow... OK. Just... wow.
Re:Guideworks blows (Score:4, Interesting)
That's why your complaints about the box with the Guideworks software are exactly my complaints about the box with the MS software, same locking up, same queuing up of the button presses, same everything.
Re: (Score:1)
So that's why it failed so often (Score:1)
This great news (dumping MSFT on my cable box), combined with the planned rollout of 400 Mbps cable modem service for the same price as I pay today, is fantastic!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I for one welcome our non-patent-overlording non-MSFT overlords.
Bringing it in (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps, but what I think is interesting is that Comcast was the last (hell, maybe it was the only>/i>) US cable company to use it. I'm just surprised that Microsoft, with all its cashola, couldn't muster better numbers in its home country. And strong in South America? What's with that?
The Chemo Is Working (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Good thing? (Score:3, Funny)
hate hate hate hate
Microsoft has television software? (Score:4, Funny)
Enhanced for your pleasure (Score:3, Informative)
http://wilshipley.com/blog/2006/03/this-post-is-m
This is bad news for Washington Comcast Customers (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Hmmmm (Score:1)
opportunity for improvement (Score:5, Insightful)
- widescreen support somewhere between zero and none
- menu tree overly deep and wide, with a bad bad case of feature creep
- distracting ad banners in every corner of the screen
- video-on-demand jerky and unresponsive to ff/rew/pause buttons
- huge fonts means you can only see listings for 1 hour and 5 channels on the screen at once
- huge overscan margins which is not required for LCD or plasmas anyway
- horrible play-skool color choices for the buttons, lists, menus, overlays.
- cheesy 3-D looking buttons that look like windows 3.1 or motif 1.0 at best
- showing channel number and station ID in pop-up or overlays instead of spending $5 to display it in LED's on the front of the box
- button only remotes--how about a jog/shuttle scroll wheel like VCR's used to have
- remotes with 60 buttons of which you only use 8 most of the time
- the 1/4 size live picture when you pull up the menus or the guide is cute, except for those rare occasions when you're trying to read the menus or the guide
- the box that supports DD5.1 or component video costs way more than it should...you can get the same outputs on a $30 DVD player at wal-mart, why should it cost so much more on a STB
- how about an open protocol so i can access the cable feed from myth tv directly instead of having to use an IR emitter or cable card
- maybe not charge so much for PPV movies since they're $1/day to rent at Kroger
- when you do the triple-play, how about not sending me two or three boxes, how about just one box with a telephone jack, an ethernet port, and component video jacks?
- why do you have to have some guy come out to "install" this thing when I can connect cables together just fine myself
- how about HD actually being the same bandwidth as what I can get for FREE from rabbit ears instead of compressing the living daylights out of it
- set top box can't actually set on top anymore if you have a flat panel TV, how about some brackets or let it look decent mounted in a vertical position
- record button should be able to start my VCR (or should have 10 years ago) like directv receivers can, not just change the channel
- even if the STB was flawless and seamless to use, the actual content is crap. i swear i spend more time using the cable modem to view stuff on youtube than i do watching TV.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
- How about have on-screen guides in HD? After all, the box is for HD, why not bring the program data(descriptions, etc) and re-render it in 720 or 1080? C'mon, it's 2007.
- enable the composite in ports in the front? I'd love to have access to those to hook up a video game console, etc.
- enable the Ethernet port so I can watch downloaded videos(okay that's a pipe dream, but that dang Ethernet could be useful).
- make the god d
As someone who lives in Washington... (Score:2, Interesting)
But you know, down with M$!!! rah rah rah...
You are attempting to change the channel (Score:4, Funny)
That's funny... (Score:2)
AT&T (Score:2, Informative)
Ballmer says Comcast violates 235 patents (Score:4, Funny)
Did they really drop it? (Score:3, Funny)
It did not just plug-and-play with my router, I had to plug it directly into a computer first and run their configuration. So, I plugged it into my powerbook. I expected trouble when the Comcast website came up telling me I would have to download some software, but when I clicked the button, the file it downloaded was actually a mac file--wow.
After unpacking the install program a warning message popped up telling me I needed to use Internet explorer to continue the configuration. It then installed IE 5.something, which promptly froze up and died.
Re: (Score:2)
The only answer is to call Comcast (two or three times, since the first person you talk to will point you to a site to download th
Bring Back UltimateTV, Microsoft! (Score:2)
Then Microsoft shut down the UTV group, transfering the people off to, I think, the XBox group, apparently planning to someday integrate games and set-top boxes.
The
How about 3rd-party boxes? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The hardware/software to skip recording the commercials, or skip playback of commercials would be trivial to implement-apparently this is a big no no nowdays.
What would be more reasonable to expect is right out of 'A Clockwork Orange'. New TV tech will require you to sit in this special chair with restraing devices and eyelid clamps so you have to watch their commercials.
It will be marketed as the new soooper duper enhanced media chair that will expa
Re: (Score:2)
There's still ads though no doubt. (Score:2)
Or perhaps someone could make an adblock addon for these cableboxes?
Re: (Score:2)
Guideworks is terrible (Score:1)
Ouch (Score:1)
Whatever happened to Liberate? (Score:2)
Liberate made set-top-box software that competed with Microsoft but they seem to have fallen on hard times. When I interviewed there back in 2001 it looked like they had a chance of actually competing.
Today their web site is basically an e-tombstone.
Anybody out there know what led to their demise?
-S
Guide gone, but MS isn't out of the TV business (Score:2)
Which is the Lesser Evil? (Score:2)
This is sort of like trying to decide who to root for in an Alien vs. Predator duel. My preference is to toss them both into the Thunderdome and then nuke it from orbit.
>The cable company will replace the Microsoft technology with GuideWorks software -- Comcast is a part owner of GuideWorks.
The issue is not that Comcast is particularly unhappy with Microsoft. It is more that they are going with software they own a piece of. In my experience, that usually turns out badly.
It's Comcastic (Score:2)
The other day, my son finished his homework and sat down for his favorite show: Heros. The show had started 20 minutes ago, so flicked on the TV, saw the start of a key scene (live), reach for the remote and hit the DVR button to start from the beginning, and BOOM - the box decided to reboot. He was in a complete panic, because he knew he just missed that key scene forever. My daughter noticed his frustration, and yelled out "It's Comcastic," which is what we always say when there's a
Never used extensively (Score:2)
One more reason to use Dish Network. Their software has crappy UI, but it's stable (at least on my 625 DVR), has all the features you could want, and responds quickly.
why is South America different (Score:2)
Does anyone know why Microsoft is doing well in South America but not in North America? What's the difference between the two markets?
What software is the rest of the country using? (Score:2)
Is GuideWorks what I've got as the guide now?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Of course, they (excuse me mr. microsoft employee, YOU) changed it so that the BSOD is on-screen for less than a second, then the PC reboots itself.
But the damned thing is still there. Anyone who says Windows never BSODs is either ignorant or lying.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
No matter what app I've installed on Linux, at worst I've only had to boot to single user mode and clean up the mess.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And yet the Comcast software is still light years behind the Tivo software which Comcast signed an agreement with years ago and they still show no signs of changing to a vastly superior solution.
More likely, its about money, and the fact they get the Guideworks software cheaper since they own a big chunk of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Clues spotted at Comcast? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Oh my freakin' God, you're kidding me right! I'm a user of the Microsoft/Comcast thing now and it's horrible. Now you're telling me that we going to be subjected to worse?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps if you cared more about customers than promoting your anti-Microsoft agenda, you'd realize that the Comcast software is, without reservations, worse in every way that the Microsoft software.
That may be true, but it has not yet been shown that Comcast is a company interested in turning its various revenue streams into means of suppressing entire industries and waving FUD over the heads of the FOSS community. Less money in Microsoft's hands is always a good thing, regardless of who has to suffer in the short term.
If Comcast's software sucks that bad, this will turn into less money for them. They'll either fix the problem or lose customers, but the chances of them using that money to threaten
Re: (Score:2)
Less money in Microsoft's hands is always a good thing, regardless of who has to suffer in the short term.
This kind of attitude is why many of us roll our eyes at some in the FOSS community, and rightly so. If your precious ideology means so much to you AND you want it to spread, then be cognizant of the needs of those to whom you would have it spread. Customers of cable DVR software do not deserve to have bad software. They are caught in the crossfire and do not understand how to get out. They won't understand esoteric (to them) arguments about FOSS and how Microsoft is trying to crush the penguin.
T