Futurama Movie Set For November 27 308
kevin_conaway writes "TV Squad informs us that the new Futurama movie will be available on November 27. The show will return as a full-length, high-def film sold on DVD. It will be followed by three additional films, and each film will be divided into four episodes, each to be aired on Comedy Central. So, that's 4 DVD movies or 16 new episodes."
Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Informative)
Matt & David & Co.: if any of you are reading this I want to say THANK YOU for hanging in there and making these DVDs happen. Here's to hoping to the return of Futurama to full production!
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, sure, you bleeding hearts whine about the poor oppressed Mongols now, but you'll be shitting your pants and crying for your mama when the horde is breaching your walls.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Funny)
Morbo: Belligerent and numerous
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
But does it come in a convenient suppository format?
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Informative)
I'll get my coat.
Re: (Score:2)
Finally (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I just find that odd. If it was Reagan, more people would relate I think. I mean, yes, ok, we get it, Nixon was a bad president, ha ha ha. But he's already been parodied in every comedy show there is, we don't need yet another go at
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Let me be the first to say... (Score:2)
Seriously though, this is fantastic news and makes it a lot more real in my mind. I hope they leave those god damned clone kids out of it though
Re: (Score:2)
Agree the clones in Futurama remind me of Scrappy Doo in Scooby Doo. Both annoying characters. Though I'm glad to get a solid date. This is one of my favorite American shows.
Finally (Score:5, Insightful)
About damn time (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:About damn time (Score:5, Informative)
That's news to Matt Groening.
FINE! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I guess the two additional movies that the cast of the Simpsons movie are in negotiations for is rumor then?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
Whaddya mean, "parody?" Zapp plays it straight!
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Man, wish I hadn't already posted in this thread, funniest Slashdot comment I've read in weeks, and I have modpoints.
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
You're obviously confused and aroused.
Oh thank GOD! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
There will be a million unnecessary quotes, but... (Score:2, Funny)
"Gumbercules?! I love that guy!!"
Yay (Score:5, Funny)
Big Deal (Score:2)
I never really.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, yes, but Firefly, Farscape and Futurama (ok, and sometimes Lexx) should have tought us otherwise by now. Star Trek also had its moments, although not constantly. Sci-Fi CAN be funny
Re: (Score:2)
What fraction of Americans do you think are going to get "aleph-1-plex" or jokes about Hawking?
Re:I never really.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I never really.. (Score:4, Informative)
Also, many of the jokes are more subtle than those usual to the Simpsons, and probably people won't want to look at a cartoon and have to think harder to understand its humour.
That said, I am already waiting on it.
Is "specialist" humour more "subtle"? IMHO, no. (Score:5, Insightful)
The Simpsons *did* contain subtle humour in some areas. Whereas I feel Futurama's was very reliant upon parodying retro science fiction cliches and the old "aspects of present-day society given a futuristic twist" school of sci-fi comedy.
For my money, Futurama *never* felt like it would have the same universal appeal that The Simpsons managed so effectively. That's not to say that it was bad, but dakameleon put his (her?) finger on it very well when he said that The Simpsons had more characters people could identify with [slashdot.org].
FWIW, I feel that The Simpsons actually has more creativity and freedom than Futurama. On first glance you'd expect the opposite, as being set in a fantasy future it has the freedom to do anything. In reality, it's quite tied by its retro sci-fi roots and reliance upon parody, both of which limit it creatively and in terms of audience appeal.
This probably sounds like I think Futurama sucks; I don't. It's all relative- but there are sound and legitimate reasons why it's not- and never will be- as well-loved as The Simpsons.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Chris Mattern
Re:I never really.. (Score:4, Informative)
Fox set up Futurama to run at 7PM EST / 6PM CST. This was on a Sunday. Fox had football running on Sundays. With the exception of the west coast, most of the country never saw the show. Many times they joined the show already in progress at approx 20 after, so no one could know what was going on. Too many football games went past their time slot.
Plus, there are those that attended church on Sunday nights, so they never saw an episode. While living with the parents, it was a requirement to attend church on Sunday nights. I never caught the show unless I was sick or after I had moved out. So I never got a chance to see the entire run until Adult Swim started showing it.
So for a few, other things were going on on Sunday nights. For many others they never got a chance to see the show due to Fox's use of a 7PM time slot on a day they had football scheduled until 7PM, but typically it ran until 7:20.
No promotion behind it. All I remember ever seeing commercials for was Simpsons and King of the Hill.
Re: (Score:2)
I do agree that the time slot sucked. Same thing for King of the Hill which I also like a lot more than the Simpsons. I would miss it because of church activities or because of some stupid football game.
Thank goodness for adult swim.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I never really.. (Score:5, Insightful)
This is all true for the majority of my friends (who I know from engineering school or my career in software). However, my girlfriend's friends and my family can only check off one or two items on that list. They'll get a few laughs, sure. But even though The Simpsons and Family Guy are mediocre by comparison, those two shows never leave the majority of people thinking "I don't get it..." Futurama is just a masterpiece with a small audience, so it has less earning power.
The good news is that with Video over IP finally becoming cheap, HTPCs starting to catch on, and the popularity of DVD sales and rentals; the cost of entry to the TV show market is plummeting. The future looks good for shows like Futurama
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
At last! (Score:2, Funny)
Random celebratory quote:
"The Elders tell of a young ball much like you. First he bounced 3 meters in the air... Then he bounced 1.8 meters in the air. Then he bounced *4* meters in the air."
Eggggselllent. . . (Score:2)
Oh, wait: wrong series.
Any differences in the releases? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah and look how that turned out.
Re: (Score:2)
>Yeah and look how that turned out.
Ouch... yeah, point. I think Futurama season 4 was a slight step down in quality too. The jokes were telegraphed way ahead, and there were no new interesting characters introduced.
On the other hand, the redeeming qualities were that plots moved from just being satirical joke-vehicles to real story arcs with interesting sci-fi twists and developing characters, at least with regards to Fry&
Wohoo! (Score:2)
Don't forget (Score:5, Insightful)
All glory to the Hypno-Toad!
Mmm! (Score:5, Insightful)
--HypnoToad
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnotoad#Hypnotoad [wikipedia.org]
Preview (Score:3, Insightful)
Networks (Score:5, Interesting)
Often they bail very early on a show that could be successful (like Drive this year, or Firefly) before they ever give the show a chance to succeed. If you don't market a show, people don't know it exists, and they aren't going to watch it. The weird thing is that there is quite a bit of start-up cost in getting an animated show running with an animation shop. 16 episodes is more than a half-season slate. I don't know why they don't just bring it back as a mid-season replacement on Fox, see how it goes, and hopefully just bring the show back for good?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A show can't build a fanbase, can't get ratings, can't sell ads, if it's not even on when it's scheduled to be.
I don't think Fox wanted it to s
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Networks have more viewers than cable. They get more return on the investment if they air it on FOX as opposed to Comedy Central, not to mention now Fox suddenly saves themselves money since they don't have to pay for another show to fill that timeslot.
Either way, they can still sell the DVDs like they did with Family
Re:Networks (Score:4, Insightful)
And take a show like Firefly. They only aired like 6 episodes total, in different time-slots, out of order, and never advertised the show. They aired a whopping 4 episodes of Drive, which got good reviews from pretty much every critic on the planet, and it was canceled.
I'm not a big fan of TV, and I was never a Whedon fan. I really hated Buffy and Angel, but Firefly was a damned good show. It sold like man on DVD to the point where they made a movie. Initial ratings aren't always indicative of the quality of the show. Jerry Springer was the highest rated show on the entire planet for a while, and so was Baywatch. And sometimes really good shows how poor ratings because no one knows anything about them. Even though Firefly sold well on DVD and was critically acclaimed, most people still haven't heard about the show.
That is poor advertising on the part of the network.
Jericho is another fine example. The network canceled it because of "poor ratings" and it had a huge fan-base who spent money out of pocket to take out an ad in Variety, and ship tons of peanuts to the network demanding the show be brought back. How were the ratings so poor with so many fans?
The Neilsen ratings often don't pick up on people who record shows with their DVR, and they also don't account for the people who watch the show on CBS.com so the ratings really didn't accurately reflect how large of a fan base the show actually had. If the networks were "experts" as you put it, they wouldn't lose so much money every year developing all these new shows that bomb. They wouldn't have canceled shows like Futurama, Firefly, Family Guy or Jericho in the first place when market demand for these shows was so high that they made more money after cancellation than before.
I know a guy (we're not close friends, but we have spoke on a few occasions) who wrote Grosse Point Blank. (Great friggin' movie) and he kept getting approached by the networks to do some TV work. He had some great stories. No one wanted to touch anything new, because it wasn't established and they had no way to determine if it would be successful or not. However they kept asking him to make "The Next Friends" show, because Friends was huge at the time. Every week when the new movies came out, whatever was big in the box office, they'd tell him to clone that.
Just because someone has money, that doesn't make them an expert. Far from it. As Kevin Smith said, "Hollywood is the only place where you fail upwards."
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
As Kevin Smith said, "Hollywood is the only place where you fail upwards."
Ouch. Clearly spoken by someone who's only worked in Hollywood. As distressing and counter-intuitive as it may be in this culture, that's how it works in every industry that I've seen (notably software, computer games). The only place I haven't seen that happen severely is in my college teaching gigs.
Re: (Score:2)
Then who bought the DVDs and watched it on Cartoon Network?
Re: (Score:2)
Was it really? It was buffy in space. I still don't understand all the hype that show gets.
Re: (Score:2)
Futurama Movie Trailer! (Score:5, Informative)
Cancelled by the 'Box Network'!
Great... (Score:2, Funny)
Terrific news about 16 new episodes though! Katay Sagal needs the work.
Kittens ... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Oh wait, we did that one already.
Never mind.
Re:misnomer (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:misnomer (Score:5, Informative)
A DVD can put out a native widescreen 480p picture, which was the bare minimum for the original HD specs. Most high-def TV shows are broadcast in 720p, and the new high-def movie formats are 1080p, but most high-def TVs can't even support 1080p. There is no single resolution that defines HD content.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
However the ORIGINAL HD spec included 480p. That is why the original XBox says it supported high-def, when the games only went up to 480p.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Our SD digital transmission is anamorphic and our analogue broadcast is good old fashioned 4:3.
The parent poster is quite correct in that there is no standard resolution that defines HD content. It's a mess.
Seriously. You should try post producing a show that has been shot at 720p 29.9
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Me too (Score:5, Funny)
"God Lord! Thats over 150 atmospheres of pressure!
How many atmospheres can the ship withstand, professor?
Well it's a spacship. So anywhere between 0 and 1."
I think the number of people in the general population that would get that joke is one reason the series was canceled.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Chris Mattern
Re:Me too (Score:5, Funny)
Bender: Part of one.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
As long as it's good enough to see Amy's obscene tattoo it's high def enough for Futurama