Bones Found Near Crash Site Confirmed Fossett's 129
Trip6 writes "Bones found near the wreckage of the plane flown by Steve Fossett when he disappeared last fall have been confirmed to be Fossett's by DNA analysis. The NTSB is still investigating the crash. Fossett may have been searching for a place to break the land speed record, his next quest."
I was right! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:World Records.... (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
I don't understand why that's sad.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe you should start wearing parachute pants.
Re:Sad news. (Score:5, Insightful)
No, he didn't die while flying a plane. He died while crashing a plane.
Re:Sad news. (Score:5, Insightful)
The vast majority of plane crashes occur while the planes are flying.
Very few simply crash while they're sitting in the hangar - so he was still flying when he crashed I expect.
Re:Sad news. (Score:5, Funny)
Look, if you're going to make wild claims like that, I want to see some statistics to back them up.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
98.4% of plane crashes occur while the planes are flying.
Happy now?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Plane crashes. (Score:1)
More crashes occur on the ground than in the air. In fact, according to http://www.planecrashinfo.com/cause.htm [planecrashinfo.com] 62% of crashes occur on the ground, they're just usually the least fatal.
There's not a lot of risk in straight and level flight...
most deadly air disaster (Score:4, Interesting)
The vast majority of plane crashes occur while the planes are flying.
Whilst the above is true, it's worth noting that the most deadly aviation disaster occured on the ground, at Tenerife's Los Rodeos airport [super70s.com] where two 747s collided, killing 683 people.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
one of the planes taking part in the collision was already airborne at the crash point.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
one of the planes taking part in the collision was already airborne at the crash point.
And pulling up on the stick made the tail of the plane drag on the runway [wikipedia.org]. I think that means he wasn't very "airborne".
Re: (Score:2)
Not that it's totally against what you wrote but most planes crash at start or landing, and not while actually flying as in "omg all engines failed and now we will drop 10.000 m."
Re: (Score:2)
The vast majority of plane crashes occur while the planes are flying.
No, the vast majority of plane crashes occur when planes stop flying, or fail to begin flying in the first place.
CFIT is mercifully uncommon these days.
Re: (Score:2)
Flying implies controlled, I suspect that even the couple moments before he crashed it wasn't controlled.
Re:Sad news. (Score:4, Informative)
No, they occur when the plane ceases flight.
Re: (Score:2)
You've never heard of "Hangar Rash" have you?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And the vast majority of computers running Windows never suffer from a bsod. Because if it's done a bsod, it isn't running anything.
What's more the majority of train derailments don't happen on rails. Otherwise they wouldn't be derailed.
Re: (Score:2)
Which reminds me of one of my favorite bits of bureaucratic terminology, Controlled Flight Into Terrain [wikipedia.org]. That is, the plane was operating normally and the pilot was conscious and at the controls, but somehow an inconveniently placed cumulogranite cloud still managed to get in the way.
Re:Sad news. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The term is either "Controlled flight into terrain" or "Uncontrolled flight into terrain", depending on the cause of the crash. Either way, it's flight.
Re: (Score:1)
What are mid-air collisions called? With other aircraft? Or crashes while taxiing? I'd imagine those are less common though....
Re: (Score:2)
What are mid-air collisions called? With other aircraft?
"Mid-air collisions". See the bit about TCAS in this report [bfu-web.de]
Or crashes while taxiing? I'd imagine those are less common though....
Don't know. The incident that springs to mind was the Tenerife crash in 1977, but I'm not aware of any usual terminology for that sort of incident (there can be a "usual terminology" for a highly unusual accident, because the folks managing safety will still talk about what they're working to avoid, but most of my experience is en-route or take-off/landing rather than ground movements).
Anyway, for aviation safety purposes,
flight is defined (in as s
Runway incursion (Score:1)
Or crashes while taxiing? I'd imagine those are less common though....
Runway incursion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runway_incursion [wikipedia.org]
Any occurrence at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle, or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the landing and take-off of aircraft.
My subscription to the NTSB Reported lapsed when I stopped flying http://www.ntsb-reporter.com/ [ntsb-reporter.com] but it is highly recommended reading for any pilot if you wish to learn from other's mistakes. I
Re: (Score:2)
Not quite. A ground-crash could take place on a stand or taxiway, and wouldn't be a runway incursion, and a runway incursion need not lead to an accident -- in fact, most don't, most lead to suspension of movements whilst ATC shout things like "Will somebody get that ****** off the runway!"
More precisely, a runway incursion is an incident, not an accident.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
While true, there are a whole host a medical issues that wouldn't be caught during a 3rd class medical. They're also only required every 2 years (per 3 years if you're under 40). Problems could crop up between one and the next.
Just one note too: though I'm pretty positive he was flying your private pilot privileges, a private pilot can allow has medical to lapse and still fly under sport pilot privileges. You have some restrictions there on what planes you can fly (mostly based on weight), but the older,
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's been extended as of around June, I think. Third-class certificates now last 60 calendar months if the person is under 40. The change is retroactive, so if you're two years into your 36-month certificate, you're now two years into your 60-month certificate.
They could rule out mechanical failure (Score:2)
The investigators will at least be able to rule in or out problems with the aircraft - unless theres been some very hungry aluminium chomping wildlife around that area recently!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You don't need CO.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/23/1016843080716.html [theage.com.au]
Re:Sad news. (Score:5, Insightful)
Clear air doesn't always mean safe air. Given his altitude, airframe icing may be a cause.
Nor does experience mean the pilot will always make the best decisions...experience is the best teacher only if you always listen to it, combined with good judgment.
I'd guess a mechanical failure of some sort. Carb door coming off and getting sucked into the manifold, bearing/crank/valve train failure, fuel delivery, whatever. Any number of problems that may arise while perhaps toodling around low and slow become huge almost unmanageable problems very quickly. The transition from aircraft to glider to lawn dart can be astoundingly quick and fully outside the bounds of any pilot to fix.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
given his altitude, if he was not wearing an oxygen mask or in a pressurized cabin, he may have simply fell asleep.
It's incredibly easy to lose consciousness at the altitude he was as if you are not vigilant at conserving your personal energy... In fact at 10,000 feet it's plain old stupid not to be wearing an air mask in that plane.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
10,000 isn't THAT bad. Most people are fine at that altitude. By regulations you're not expressly required to use supplemental oxygen until 14,500 feet. You do have to use it however if you go above 12,500 feet (but less than the 14,500 ft mark) for more than 30 minutes.
Typically, FAA regulations are actually very well worded, and most good pilots tend to heed them very well. I don't think hypoxia was an issue here.
Re: (Score:2)
It's incredibly easy to lose consciousness at the altitude he was as if you are not vigilant at conserving your personal energy... In fact at 10,000 feet it's plain old stupid not to be wearing an air mask in that plane.
But was he at 10k feet? If he was looking for spots to break the land speed record, he should have been Especially seeing as how he was experienced at high altitude conditions with all his various stunts/record attempts, I find that losing conciousness due to altitude unlikely.
My personal theory is that he might of had a stroke, which can come on quicker than a heart attack and disable the pilot sooner - leaving him unable to pilot or call on the radio/activate any emergency beacon. I think a heart attack
Re: (Score:2)
Given his altitude, airframe icing may be a cause.
Airframe icing is not possible without visible moisture. Since he was not on a flight plan he would not have been legally allowed to fly into a cloud, and if freezing rain was falling on the aircraft he'd be an idiot not to recognize it and turn around. Since I don't think he'd hang around in clouds for extended periods of time or be dumb enough to let freezing rain build up on the wings I highly doubt icing caused this crash.
Re: (Score:2)
Airframe icing maybe, but not carb icing. Carb icing has been known to occur in clear skies in temperatures as high as 70 degrees F. That said, carb icing, if noticed in time (the engine starts to run rough and lose power - I've had it start to build up plenty of times and it's easy to recognize), can generally be avoided by applying carb heat. Given his experience level though I doubt he would have missed the signs.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Oops. Didn't know that. The only engines I've flown are the Cont. O-200, Lyc. O-235, and Cont. A-65. All had carbs so I'm just used to thinking in that mindset :).
Re: (Score:1)
Err, no. 8KCAB Decathalons have a Lyc AEIO-360-H1B engine. Fuel injected, no carb icing.
Nope, the one I fly has an AEIO-320-E1B....you're thinking of the Super Decathlon, also an 8KCAB. But yeah, no carb icing with fuel injection.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In other words we should give everyone a pilot's license and let gravity sort out the group?
Darwin didn't see that one coming.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope.
By stats, it's a lot safer to fly on an established huge jet airline that covers millions of miles in a year than : a private pilot with any experience flying a very small aircraft. By huge orders of magnitude.
That you think by glancing at these figures and deducing flying is safe is hugely wrong. Flying in huge jumbo type jets run by mega corporations is safer than driving...probably.
That by looking at stats for what amounts to scaffolding with wings versus tires...tires wins by a huge amount.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
From what I've heard, a twin engine plane is harder to fly. Even more so if you have a failed engine, the engine is so far off to one side that if you can manage it, it's tighter margins.
Not only that, a single engine plane can sail a good distance without an engine.
Land speed record? (Score:2, Funny)
I'd say he possibly broke the speed landing record.
Re:Land speed record? (Score:5, Funny)
Nope. The record for a speed landing is still held by Beagle 2 which currently stands at a Mach 352 High Performance Landing.
Re:Land speed record? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Possibly, but that certainly wasn't a world record.
Yes it was - just not this world!
Re: (Score:2)
"It is not known for certain whether the lander reached the Martian surface; [...] It may have missed Mars altogether, skipped off the atmosphere and entered an orbit around the sun, or burned up during its descent."
It's a big assumption that Beagle 2 reached the surface, and one not based on any evidence.
Emergency transmitter didn't work (Score:1)
If it had given a signal then he might have been saved.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
He was dead on impact. Wouldn't have helped, except that it might have prevented him from being eaten.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Yea, perhaps if the medics had arrived earlier they could have put Humpty Dumpty back together again too.
Re: (Score:2)
There's no way.... (Score:5, Informative)
There's no way he was looking for a land speed record location near there. It's one of the most mountainous areas in the country. he may have started in the flats of Nevada, but he went over one mountain range and was skimming the peaks of another when he went down.
I backpacked in and camped about 5 miles north of that spot last year at Thousand Island Lake. He crashed at 10,000 feet up, which is nearing the limits for a small plane with unpressurized cockpit. If you make a wrong move and don't manage your energy right, you're dead, and there's nowhere to land safely. Likely it was too late by the time he realized he was in it too far and wasn't going to get back out.
The scenery up there is spectacular though, about a mile from his crash site is the Minarets and Minaret Lake, one of many alpine lakes that dot the Sierra range. There are backpacking trails nearby, but not on that particular very steep mountain side.
Re: (Score:1)
Cessna Opperational limit 20000ft
http://www.fsd-international.com/projects/C337/Manual/Checklists/Limitations.pdf [fsd-international.com]
I have been up at 10000ft, and felt just fine, same as skiing on snow at 7800ft.
Re: (Score:2)
Except he was in a Bellanca Citabria. You can go higher, but you generally need oxygen above 12,500 feet or you start becoming an idiot.
Re: (Score:2)
I was going to say this, as I was on another search in the same area earlier this year, and I'm part of a MOUNTAIN rescue group. Sadly, I couldn't go on the Fossett search as I had other pressing duties (work sucks).
Re: (Score:1)
Online search... Are you suggesting they could have found Fossett's remains faster by Googling for the crash site?
If by Googling you mean Google Maps... (Score:3, Interesting)
... then yes. That is almost exactly what the GP is referring to.
With some Amazon's mTurk added over the Google layer.
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/09/geeks-spot-foss.html [wired.com]
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/373893/internet_users_aid_in_search_for_steve.html [associatedcontent.com]
http://innonate.com/2007/09/09/is-this-steve-fossett-the-community-searches/ [innonate.com]
it's like in Star Trek... (Score:1)
RIP. (Score:5, Insightful)
He died doing what he loved and always challenged his boundaries, I can admire that.
At least the mystery is finally cleared up, the crash investigation can begin.
Re:RIP. (Score:5, Funny)
Yea these jokes are in very bad taste. Whenever bones are found it is never a humerus matter.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Sounds like he was flying with a skeleton crew.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
No bones about it!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
I've never been a fan of the idea that joking is a sign of disrespect. I find one's ability to look to the lighter side of things during dark times to be admirable.
Re: (Score:2)
Sad (but predictable on /.) to see a lot of jokes already.
No, it isn't sad atall.
I can't imagine what sort of grumpy shit you'd have to be to complain about people having a joke when you've shipped out
It doesn't diminish any of his achievements to be positive and deal with adversity whilst maintaining your sense of humour (without being ghoulish).
Re: (Score:1)
I knew it (Score:1)
At least the mystery is over (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
He was rich. He could have had medical records altered to fit the corpse that he purchased, or maybe even had himself cloned.
Re: (Score:1)
Risky business? Depends. Medical probs? Unlikely. (Score:2)
Also, to address the pos
Re:Risky business? Depends. Medical probs? Unlikel (Score:5, Interesting)
All an aviation medical proves is that you were probably alive at the time of the medical. I knew a fellow pilot who died of a heart attack the day after getting his aviation medical renewed!
Re:Risky business? Depends. Medical probs? Unlikel (Score:4, Interesting)
Mistake in headline (Score:1)
Bones Found Near Crash Site Confirmed Fossett's.. (Score:2)
.. Recovery Team. In a statement, leader of the Fossett Recovery Crew said "Doctor McCoy was alive and well after the shuttle accident, and said that maybe scattering your atoms across space isn't such a bad idea after all".
Bones... (Score:2)
Bears, other animals ate him? (Score:1)
No one has mentioned this, probably out of respect for the family. Since only a few remains were found and quite far from wreckage. In the name of science it would be cool to know from experts about what happens to carcasses in them there CA mountains, and if the altitude of the impact bars some type of animal activity.
Is it just me... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Google Earth is good for seeing where salt flats are located, but not what condition they're in. A damp dry lake bed isn't very useful as a test track.
Chuck Yeager had a humorous story in his autobiography about an argument he had with John Glenn. Glenn insisted that a particular salt flat was safe for use as an emergency landing site, while Yeager said he flown over the site in the past week or so, and knew the site was still damp and unsafe.
So to settle the argument, he and Glenn take a trainer out to the
Turk (Score:1)
A riddle (Score:2)
A. The tail section of the aircraft.
What?!? Too soon?
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Slashdot's editors are merely experiencing gravitational time dilation due to their proximity to CmdrTaco's massive ego.
Time is passing more slowly in their reference frame, so it takes longer to approve the stories.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Yea but I won't believe it until Netcraft confirms it.
Re: (Score:1)
Bah. Netcraft only confirms when things are dying. Sounds like Fossett's death didn't leave much time for Netcraft to even know about it, let alone confirm it.
Re: (Score:1)
1. This isn't a political news site, it's a geek news site. If you want politico.com, you know where to find it.
2. That being said, sometimes Slashdot covers politics. Usually when something happens that directly affects tech, science, or the banning of ewoks. The election was never really covered here except to the extent of having discussions on the candidates views surrounding tech and science issues.
3. If the editors decide to post a post-election story, they will. If not, they won't. In the end