Neuromancer Movie In Your Future? 239
An anonymous reader pointed out a link talking about how Vincenzo Natali, writer/director of Splice, has written a screenplay for Neuromancer. The article says he even ran it by Gibson. No studio is attached to the project, but at least Natali promised "No Keanu."
This story is a repeat... (Score:5, Informative)
...from every year that Slashdot has been in existence.
Re: (Score:2)
Way too late! (Score:4, Insightful)
The problem is, "Neuromancer" was cutting edge in 1984. If they had made it into a movie within 10 years, they might have had a shot at succeeding, but now cyberpunk is mainstream and all the ideas that were new and different in Neuromancer have become cliché thanks to other films and TV shows introducing it in piecemeal fashion.
"Durr" has it right farther down the thread - "Neuromancer: The Movie" will look like it's just following in the footsteps of dated crappy cyberpunkish movies.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the "movie" that plays in my head when I read Gibson's prose is probably better than anything that Hollywood could come up with anyway.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Ah the insightful words of a true visionary...
If everybody thought like you did, we wouldn't even have sci-fi to begin with.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They will make it and I will not watch it.. Hollywood has managed to ruin every old movie and TV show from my childhood and they are NOT going to start with one of my favorite books and take Neuromancer away from me.
Re: (Score:2)
BTW, I want room service.
Re:This story is a repeat... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They're all dead and /. doesn't want that bad things are said about them.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Nice. Why is everybody an AC in that thread? I thought they had accounts by that point in /.'s history.
http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=666&cid=1777841 [slashdot.org]
looks like jwz [wikipedia.org]had the second comment...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:This story is a repeat... (Score:5, Funny)
Gibson! (Score:3, Funny)
Having a guitar play Henry would be pretty awesome.
Keanu (Score:2)
Do not try and appreciate the acting in the Matrix. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth: there IS no Keanu Reeves. He's a computer generated graphic.
Re: (Score:2)
Do not try and appreciate the acting in the Matrix. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth: there IS no Keanu Reeves. He's a computer generated graphic.
but of course Johnny Mnemonic would be the Gibson film with Keanu in it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And Johnny Mnemonic really wasn't all that bad.
Doesn't match the source material all that well, but that's hardly Keanu's fault.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
According to cannon, Johnny was assassinated before Case came along, so Keanu shouldn't be in it anyway. But that leaves us with an unpalatable Dina Meyer as Molly (or Jane as she was known in the movie). I think I'll lie down now.
Re:Keanu (Score:5, Funny)
According to cannon...
Personally, I only trust howitzer for original source material.
Re: (Score:2)
According to cannon, Johnny was assassinated before Case came along, so Keanu shouldn't be in it anyway. But that leaves us with an unpalatable Dina Meyer as Molly (or Jane as she was known in the movie). I think I'll lie down now.
I remember reading an interview with Gibson some time ago where he talked about the Johnny Mnemonic movie. He noted that he kept Molly out of the screenplay because that character showed up in multiple novels and he didn't want the studio to have any rights to the character. So no problem. Jane is not Molly. On purpose.
Re: (Score:2)
.
Re: (Score:2)
>And Johnny Mnemonic really wasn't all that bad.
I thought it was, and I dont blame the production or the actors. The source material, frankly, is more fantasy than sci-fi. Gibson weaves a good tale, but with a lot of silliness and his stories have as much to do with fashion and hipster attitudes than technology. Generally, people think Neuromancer is unfilmable. Not me. I just think a sincere attempt to make it a film would produce something closer to "Hackers" than "Schindler's List."
Re: (Score:2)
*shrugs* I liked it. Though I'm a big Rollins.
Dear Lord (Score:2)
The guy absolutely ruined Darth Vader (and Star Wars)
Re: (Score:2)
Blame where blame is due... (Score:3, Insightful)
Let's be clear... LUCAS ruined it. He did a great job when he was just ripping off Norse myth (and didn't even bother to change most of the names, Luke, Leia, Anakin, Skywalker, Tatooine... all right out of the original Norse), but when he had to actually make up his own content you got Midi-chlorians ...
Watch Jumpers, Christensen did a very good job in that.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Watch Jumpers, Christensen did a very good job in that.
You musta been on some seriously good drugs while watching jumpers if you thought Christensen could act.
Can you hook me up with your dealer?
Re: (Score:2)
good acting != good movie. Jumpers had plot holes large enough to drive a bus through, but his acting was well done given the script he was handed.
Re: (Score:2)
Emotionally uninvolved? Sure. Whiny bitch? No. Go back and watch the scenes where he bitches about not being on the council, not getting respect, being held back. The ideal way to play it would have been less whiny, more seething rage. What kills me is I've seen Hayden in other roles, and he can sort of act.
Also, personally, I thought that Keanu in Johnny Mnemonic was okay. It wasn't exactly a high budget film, and his acting was way beyond anyone else in the movie. Except maybe Jones.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, this is similar to why everyone criticises Anthony Hopkins' role as Hannibal Lecter. He's playing a PSYCHOPATH with genius level mental abilities pretending he doesn't just want to eat everyone he sees.
Oh wait, Anthony Hopkins was fucking excellent as Hannibal Lecter, he even won an Academy Award for it. This sort of role doesn't demand poor acting in any way. Hayden Christensen was awful, there is nothing else too it.
Re: (Score:2)
For what it's worth, I really liked the first one. It was an amazing story, and Reeves' unique dumber-than-brick acting style really worked, lent the role an intense cluelessness that was perfect. Once Neo knows what he's doing though, the dumber-than-brick style of Reeves' just doesn't work. It just means Neo is a dumb fuck. As such, the second was only watchable for the fight scenes, and the third was just plain terrible. Even the fight scenes weren't that good.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
For what it's worth, I really liked the first one. It was an amazing story, and Reeves' unique dumber-than-brick acting style really worked, lent the role an intense cluelessness that was perfect. Once Neo knows what he's doing though, the dumber-than-brick style of Reeves' just doesn't work. It just means Neo is a dumb fuck. As such, the second was only watchable for the fight scenes, and the third was just plain terrible. Even the fight scenes weren't that good.
[insert the same tired xkcd joke about there only being one Matrix movie here]
[insert instant +5 Funny here]
Re: (Score:2)
The best role I've ever seen Keanu in was "A Walk In The Clouds"; he actually did an okay job. The role was made for him: it's about a guy who does a poor job of acting (in this case, of acting like he's the father of a child that isn't his). His natural lack of acting talent just comes across as the character having a lack of acting talent.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, he was pretty good in both The Lake House and Sweet November. Believe it or not, the guy actually *can* act. Why he doesn't try it more often, I don't know.
Re: (Score:2)
Remember the allegation that the first movie's script was plagiarized? I think it's probably true. The first movie did have an amazing and innovative story, while the second two movies were crap. It makes perfect sense that the directors stole the script idea for the first one, and then when the movie was a giant hit and they got a contract for sequels, they had to write those themselves (since the author they plagiarized from didn't write anything else for them to steal), and of course what they came up
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Don't be mean. He's a passable actor as long as you keep him in the correct characters.
I suggest:
- Robot from space.
- Tree.
- Brick.
- Guy in carbonite block (just spray him black)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Don't be mean. He's a passable actor as long as you keep him in the correct characters.
I suggest:
- Robot from space.
- Tree.
- Brick.
- Guy in carbonite block (just spray him black)
- Ted "Theodore" Logan
There, fixed that for ya.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Keanu (Score:5, Insightful)
I know people love to hate Keanu. But who else could have played Neo? The Matrix was amazing, and he played a big part in that and he can make as many november rains as he wants and i'll still love him.
Also: point break. bill and ted's. my own private idaho.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Neuromancer is a great book if it's before 1998 and you're in seventh grade.
I wondered if that was just me. I grabbed a copy of Neuromancer about a year ago to see what the fuss was about. Boring characters, almost no plot, and incredibly dated or ludicrous technology. Presumably if you read it in the '80s the technology it described was forward-looking and exciting, but now it doesn't even have that as a redeeming feature.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure the Keanu mention was a reference to his performance in the Gibson-based "Johnny Mnemonic" movie, not to the Matrix.
Right, but I couldn't think up a "No keanu reeves" joke to make off of that particular Keanu Reeves film. I was going to try a bill and ted's joke, something along the lines of "He went back in time, or to hell, not to my future with necromancer movie" but thought this crowd might appreciate the matrix a little more.
Splice? (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have seen some of Vincenzo Natali's previous movies; Cube (very original), Cypher (cool SF thriller) and Nothing (funny and absurd fantasy). He is definitely an interesting director. But I have never heard of Splice. Is it worth tracking down a DVD of Splice?
Splice [imdb.com] is a relatively new movie that I've seen floating around the interwebs lately. It looks very interesting. Haven't been able to get my hands on a copy of it yet though.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting? More like terrible. "Scientists 'play god' with genetic engineering, create monster. Monster runs amok. Hilarity ensues." Honestly, I haven't seen a premise that bad, not to mention that unoriginal, in years...
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't seen a premise that [...] unoriginal, in years...
<facebook>LIKE</facebook>
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I have seen some of Vincenzo Natali's previous movies; Cube (very original), Cypher (cool SF thriller) and Nothing (funny and absurd fantasy). He is definitely an interesting director. But I have never heard of Splice. Is it worth tracking down a DVD of Splice?
1- It's coming out in theaters soon, so I wouldn't try to find the DVD yet.
2- It seems to be EXACTLY the same movie as "Species". I can only hope they have as much T&A.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It seems to be EXACTLY the same movie as "Species". I can only hope they have as much T&A.
I thought the same thing. The splice alien is not hot unfortuantely. i'll take a pass.
How will they do the zero-G scenes? (Score:2)
Oh, I know, they'll pay $200M to the Russians to take the actors and cameramen to the ISS.
Too bad we didn't finalize and build a follow on to the Shuttle 15 years ago.
mark
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, just like how they had to film Apollo 13.
Oh wait, no not at all like that. Do you seriously think that every time someone makes a movie with zero-g scenes they have to blast everyone into space?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What I want to know is, will they be getting Robert Silverberg to write the promotional novel, too? I think the movie poster will look something like this:
"Vincenzo Natali's adaptaton of William Gibson's novel will be as good or perhaps better than the original novel itself. I am looking forward to watching it soon in a theater and may even bring my kids. Most likely I will purchase popcorn and a large diet soda."
--Robert Silverberg
I am for any Keanu Free version... (Score:2)
Unless of course, he plays the voice of the AI, which would be an entertaining twist.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't really see Keanu as having an airy sing-song voice like Wintermute was suppose to have (IIRC) I think they need one of those old mechanical speech synthesizers they built in the 1800s.
Re: (Score:2)
True, Keanu might not have the range to play a disembodied computer voice. Ahhh-nold, perhaps?
Re: (Score:2)
Wouldn't that make the AI ... dunno, a bit too inhuman, sterile and emotionless?
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, tell me about it, buddy (Score:5, Funny)
I'd like to point out (Score:2, Informative)
The important thing is (Score:5, Funny)
at least Natali promised 'No Keanu'.
EXCELLENT!!! *Air Guitar plays in the background*
Re: (Score:2)
Wooh!
Re:The important thing is (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm more worried about who plays Molly.
Keanu is too old to make a convincing Case.
Wyld Stallyns!!!!!!!! (Score:2)
at least Natali promised 'No Keanu'.
EXCELLENT!!! *Air Guitar plays in the background*
Wyld Stallyns!!!!!!! totally awesome man!
Re: (Score:2)
Think "Waynes World".
Haters - No Keanu? (Score:5, Funny)
Instead, the role of Case will be played by Ben Affleck. Whoah!
That's what hating on Keanu gets you.
Re: (Score:2)
Instead, the role of Case will be played by Ben Affleck.
Really? I heard it was going to be Will Smith.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your .sig is brilliant.
This is wholly off topic, but it had to be said.
Re: (Score:2)
Will Smith isn't a bad actor?
So... Which Earth is this? 2? 3? 75? Pick any 4 Will Smith movies and he'll be passable *at best* in 2 of them, and playing a wise-cracking jackass in 3 of them. And if you really want to destroy your opinion of Will Smith, watch Shark Tale.
Re: (Score:2)
I seriously think Johnny Mnemonic would have been pretty good if we didn't have to watch Reeves trying to show emotion. That was painful.
Approval by Gibson? (Score:5, Insightful)
The article says he even ran it by Gibson.
It does not, however, say that Gibson approved it.
Re: (Score:2)
I want to know when the movie about Second life is going to be made?
Oh, wait.. Sorry, Snow Crash, not Second Life.
Kind of creepy how accurate that book was in many ways, for how old it is.
Natali's interview (Score:5, Informative)
Found this using google search: http://www.cinematical.com/2010/05/25/interview-vincenzo-natali-explains-how-to-crack-neuromancer/
Cinematical: What do you think is the key to cracking it for the big screen?
Natali: I think it always comes down to character. I think it's about understanding who Case is and getting his story down. I've read other drafts of the script and they've had good things in them, but they never seem to hold together. And I think part of the problem, and I believe William Gibson would agree with this, but the ending is, shall we say... somewhat ambiguous and not that well defined. In thinking about how I wanted to make the movie version of that book work, I had to start with the end, figure that out first and work backwards from there.
My take on it really is a story of redemption. Case, as a classic noir hero in a sense, is someone who at first appears to be completely in it for himself. He plumbs the depths of the cybernetic underworld and then comes out and reveals that there is more to him than we first thought. It all starts with him.
But I also think you can be quite faithful to the book. I think the movie can and should have a kind of literary structure to it, it shouldn't be a traditional film structure. I think we can have moments where we go into the past and digress. I'm sure one of the issues other writers have faced in writing the adaptation is that there's so much detail that you can get lost in it. I think you have to hone it down a little bit but also allow yourself to flashback to the Screaming Fist or tell Molly's story; just have a chapter in the movie that goes into the past. I think audiences are more than sophisticated enough to handle that.
That actually excites me, I like the idea of having it being a science fiction film but also having more of a highbrow structure to it.
Re: (Score:2)
*** spoliers ***
I don't know that I agree that Case is ever really redeemed. Sure he saves his own ass, but what does he do with his reward? Buys a new liver and cyberspace deck so he can go back to abusing drugs and making money as a criminal. Molly ends up leaving him as well.
I'd argue that he's materially better off than when the story starts, but sp
So who owns Molly? (Score:2)
The last time I check someone else owned the rights to Molly Millions, not Gibson (ie. Johnny Mnemonic's female protagonist an aptly named, "Jane"). Seems like a bad foot to start on.
Re: (Score:2)
Amen. Neuromancer without Molly isn't worth watching.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? Who would that be? It wasn't whoever did the Johnny Mnemonic movie - there was no Molly in that.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The reason JM character was named "Jane" was because they were still shopping Neuromancer and didn't want to block the bigger deal if the buyer wanted an exclusivity contract.
Not because Gibson didn't have the rights.
Neuromancer still hedges on old ideas (Score:5, Interesting)
Snowcrash has a much better shot, since it pretty much assumed corporations (masquerading around as governments, churches, and media companies) will eventually take over everything. The backdrop still works.
Stephenson's Metaverse is a candied playground populated by everyone, ruled by the technological elite and the corporations who hire them, a safe place to which we see the very first danger unleashed. Gibson's cyberspace is a wild frontier rife with danger, populated exclusively by the technological elite cowboys, who risk life and sanity every day. In the modern real life, Internet access is pervasive and a wide audience will accept "OMG this thing we all do IS dangerous, people could get a computer virus!!!" but you will find a hard sell on "you know that cool web-surfing thing, well these guys nearly die doing it, and that is why they are badass, and Case, well, he almost dies a lot." huh???
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
no problem really, translate that Japanese influence that permeates Neuromancer into movie with a heavy Chinese / Indian fusion cultural influence on the west. problem solved.
Everything ever published has a screenplay written (Score:3, Insightful)
Everything ever published has at least one screenplay based on it.
Seriously. If there aren't half a dozen screenplays floating around Hollywood based on the grafitti at Central Station, I'll eat my socks. Its not worth fussing over. The fact the the movie rights to something have been bought is equally unworthy of notice; they regularly buy up rights to things that might possibly one day seem like a good idea, or even just buy up the rights to things that they think would compete against something they have in production, just to keep someone else from using it.
Now when you hear that they've hired some cameramen and actors and are starting production, _then_ you can get excited (or horrified, or whatever your reaction to hearing that one of your favorite tales is about to be Hollywoodized is.)
Movie fantasy (Score:2)
.
"No Keanu" (Score:4, Funny)
Dune (Score:2)
Visuals? (Score:2)
Natali, Really? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Me:"I like Neuromancer!"
*STHNRABITEL:"Oh, that shitty scifi movie from last year?"
Me: [have a seizure from cerebral hemorrhage]
* Someone that have not read a book in their entire life.
Re:#1!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
*STHNRABITEL...
* Someone that have not read a book in their entire life.
The first thing I thought was "Damn, someone really resented having a kid."
Re:#1!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
My first thought was "I guess all the good names for phone companies were already taken."
If they switched the second and third letters around their logo could be a rabbit sitting down and reading a newspaper.
Re: (Score:3)
Not just mainstreamlined but also compressed into less than two hours. So you get a version which cuts out half the important bits or leaves non-readers with a half baked experience.
I hope for more Science Fiction in series format, though hopefully one with a pre-written story arch and not one which meanders around for half the time like BSG (or, as I have heard, Lost) to make more money at the expense of sense. Digital distribution without the backing of a TV station but instead costing $1 or $2 per episod
Re: (Score:2)
Not just mainstreamlined but also compressed into less than two hours. So you get a version which cuts out half the important bits or leaves non-readers with a half baked experience.
Just like Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy.
Re: (Score:2)
Not just mainstreamlined but also compressed into less than two hours.
My first thought was, would they try to split it between two or three movies? It's the Neuromancer Trilogy! Mainstreamlined and expanded into nine hours... and just wait for the DVD extras.
Re: (Score:2)
I feel your pain.
I honestly loved Dune. Only that for me this means, the movie enthusiasts AND the computer game geeks turn up their collective noses at me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
movie making business never wants to prematurely shoot the sequel wad...