Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×
The Military Transportation News Technology

Mystery 'Missile' Identified As US Airways Flight 808 335

sean.peters writes "The mystery missile discussed on Slashdot Tuesday? It was US Airways 808 from Honolulu to Phoenix. An amateur sleuth checked the time against airline schedules, then the following day, checked out a webcam that was trained in the appropriate direction. He found the exact same contrail at the time AWE808 was coming over. The author deals persuasively with a number of objections to his argument."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mystery 'Missile' Identified As US Airways Flight 808

Comments Filter:
  • by bmo ( 77928 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:36PM (#34199676)

    My explanation of "It's another water heater from Mythbusters" was far more entertaining.

    --
    BMO

  • No, no (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:38PM (#34199696)

    He's a part of the conspiracy. It's a cover-up, and I will argue it as such for decades to come. Because that's the only thing that makes sense.

  • by anakin876 ( 612770 ) <anakin876.hotmail@com> on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:38PM (#34199700)
    Sheesh - already slashdotted?
    • by $RANDOMLUSER ( 804576 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:44PM (#34199794)
      No. They shut it down because they don't want us to know the truth - Google was ^%$_)&*(

      NO CARRIER
    • Re:Slashdotted? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:47PM (#34199828)

      from blog.bahneman.com:

      [Update: CBS2 in New York has a story about a similar event over NYC November 10]

      I wonder if I'm the first to call it, the reported unexplained missile launch off the coast of California, was US Airways 808.

      I did a lot of extrapolation of what flights could be at the right position (off the coast) at the right altitude (for contrail formation) and came down to two possibilities: UPS flight 902 (UPS902) or US Airways flight 808 (AWE808).

      As I was researching tonight (24 hours later), I realized that today's AWE808 current position (at around 4:50pm) was almost the same as it was the day of the incident. I quickly pulled up a Newport Beach webcam and found tha (apparently) AWE808 was making an identical contrail, 24 hours later!

      Picture 6.png

      Compare the above webcam image to the KCBS footage:

      Picture 12.png

      The comparison is quite clear. A remarkably similar, less-hyped, contrail created by the same flight almost exactly 24 hours later!

      So, based on that, and the flight track of AWE808 24 hours earlier, I believe the mysterious missile off the coast of California on November 8, 2010, was in fact the contrail of US Airways flight 808, a flight originating in Honolulu , HI (PHNL) and ending in Phoenix (KPHX).

      Picture 7.png

      I'm about 80% certain this is the right flight, though UPS902 is still a contender.

      For some additional explanation of this non-event, take a look at the Contrail Science blog.

      Other theories I've seen that explain this:

      * Accidental missile launch
      * Target for Airborne Anti-missle Laser Test
      * Chinese-made Russian-designed ICBM
      * Russian/Korean/American/Chinese "Show of strength" during Obama's tour of Asia
      * Chemtrails
      * Submarine-launched missile
      * F-22

      I respect that people will see what they want to see, particularly when it lines up with their interest. Military missile men will see a missile. Conspiracy fans will see a conspiracy. Military pilots will see an fighter jet. Myself? I'm an aviation photographer who also dabbles in weather and atmospheric phenomena. So I see a commercial airliner and its contrail, however, I also believe that this is an excellent example of Occam's Razor: "the simplest explanation is more likely the correct one."

      There are a number of variables involved here:

      * Altitude, exact time of day, direction and magnification of the KCBS news helicopter footage
      * Direction and field of view of the Newport Beach webcam
      * Exact positions of AWE808 or UPS902 when the video was made

      With those variables nailed down, in conjunction with the sun angle, an expert should be able to pinpoint exactly, the trajectory of the object. Meteor experts extrapolate this kind of information on almost a daily basis in their tracking of meteor or satellite debris entering our atmosphere.

      Some commonly commented concepts

      (My responses to these are my opinion. I'm not a meteorologist or aerospace engineer).

      - The "base" of the contrail is too wide, it should be narrower, like a road as it leads to the distance

      You would naturally make that assumption. However, a contrail, at 39,000 feet is often subject to high winds. Depending on the velocity and direction, it can spread out contrails in a matter of minutes. (These contrails often turn into feathery cirrus clouds.) The contrail created at the distance where it appears to meet the horizon has had sufficient time to spread out with the wind. Remember, the distance as viewed through a zoom lens appears to be shorter due to an optical affect called "foreshortening".

      - The object clearly had a bright, solid rocket-like engine flare

      I attribute this to the sun reflecting off th

  • by Shakrai ( 717556 ) * on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:38PM (#34199704) Journal

    Maybe the object was his web server lifting off into space?

  • by BadAnalogyGuy ( 945258 ) <BadAnalogyGuy@gmail.com> on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:40PM (#34199724)

    Deny deny deny. Obfuscate and confuse the issue. Introduce an alternative theory. Have "independent" expert validate alternative theory. Never admit truth. Wait for public to forget incident.

    It works all the time.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:43PM (#34199776)

      So I'm assuming you'll provide a decent, sane way to falsify your hypothesis? Or are you just going to reject every amount of data as possibly (sorry, I meant obviously) being tainted by THEM and part of your scary scary conspiracy?

    • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:43PM (#34199782)
      Ha! Spoken like a typical spook plant. Your faux-conspiracy theory rant wont get me this time, G-Man!
    • by MozeeToby ( 1163751 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:46PM (#34199822)

      Except that you can verify. You can look up the what time this flight left. You can use a bit of deductive reasoning, a little bit of knowledge about flight paths, and the publicly available Standard Instrument Departures for the given airport to figure out an approximate location and altitude that the plane would be at a given time. You can even, apparently, if the summary is accurate, look back at random webcams that were pointing in the right direction at the right time to see if the plane is there and leaving a contrail.

      So yeah, if you believe that the government can create that good of a cover story with that much independent evidence in a 36 hour period, well, you have more faith in government agencies than I do.

      • by Wonko the Sane ( 25252 ) * on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:50PM (#34199866) Journal

        So yeah, if you believe that the government can create that good of a cover story with that much independent evidence in a 36 hour period, well, you have more faith in government agencies than I do.

        That's the bizarre thing - why did it take 36 hours to get an answer and why didn't the definitive answer come from a definitive source?

        So it was flight 808. Either the DoD and FAA were unable to figure that out in short order or else they just don't care about giving the public answers to those kind of questions.

        Neither one of those possibilities is particularly good.

        • by MozeeToby ( 1163751 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:57PM (#34199956)

          More likely, the FAA and DoD just aren't organized for this kind of investigation. If you had gotten on the phone with the FAA or an AFB while the thing was in the air and said "What the heck is that? It's tracking heading 270, at somewhere between 20 and 30 thousand feet", you would could have gotten the answer instantly: "identifies as flight 808 out of LA". As it is, it seems like no one was really interested in this until it got put on the news that night, well after it would beyond radar range. So far as I know, the airports and Air Force bases don't keep recordings of their radar tracks, they have no way to look back at what was happening at that time.

          • by Yvan256 ( 722131 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:14PM (#34200184) Homepage Journal

            So all webmasters all over the world are expected to keep logs of all tiny details and all files requests for months if not years to come from thousands if not millions of visitors per day.

            And the FAA don't keep logs of what happens in radar range?

            Yep, it's a crazy world alright.

          • by Obfuscant ( 592200 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:22PM (#34200288)
            So far as I know, the airports and Air Force bases don't keep recordings of their radar tracks, they have no way to look back at what was happening at that time.

            Air traffic control certainly does keep "tapes" of radar signals. Whether it is really a tape or some other digital recording is irrelevant. These tapes are often used to help locate missing aircraft. After a plane is reported missing they can often "replay the tape" and identify the point of last radar contact, even for non-transpondered or VFR targets.

            This, of course, takes resources and time.

            As for the GP who talks about using "Standard Instrument Depatures" for an airport to locate a plane, ummmm.... A SID for Honolulu (departure airport) will have no relevance to the location of any aircraft by the time it hits the west coast. SIDs apply only close to the airport (<30nm in most cases), until a plane gets onto one of the Victor or Juliette (low level and "jet route" high level) airways.

        • by Beelzebud ( 1361137 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:58PM (#34199960)
          Because the 24/7 news cycle on the cable "news" stations has convinced a lot of you that answers always come instantly, between commercial breaks. In the real world it actually takes time to confirm the facts on the ground...
        • by ebuck ( 585470 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:08PM (#34200098)

          Perhaps the DoD have had a bit too much experience with the public rushing off to some half-baked conclusion, so they ignore the public in events that don't raise their alarms.

          I mean, it's not like the DoD hasn't had to put up with the hundreds of UFO sightings a year that get generated in the USA. If these UFO sightings were just "I couldn't identify it" then perhaps they wouldn't be so dismissive; but, when the sightings are more in line with "What do you mean it's not an INVASION from OUTER SPACE! You're already under control of the off-worlders, AREN'T YOU?!?!" it's a safe bet to ignore the whole lot.

        • by CannonballHead ( 842625 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:24PM (#34200314)

          It's not bizarre. It depends what you presume.

          Presume the DoD *did* do it. Ok, then they should be able to get an answer out pretty quickly. You know, a cover story or whatever.

          Assume they *didn't* do it. They obviously aren't paying much attention. Nobody on watch called the DoD and said "Hey, just want to let you know, a jet just left a contrail. Thought I'd notify you." So the DoD know they didn't do it, assume it is not a missile, and thus don't care. Why assign someone to look into it? They DID give a public answer, didn't they? Or at least, parts of the armed forces did: they denied it. That's an answer, isn't it? It's not necessarily up to them to investigate, quickly, every single jet contrail that someone says "ahhhh it's a missile launch!"

          So if you presume the DoD didn't do it, then 36 hours isn't bad. Apparently, the media doesn't really care. Afterall, a "it was a jet flying a normal pathway" story isn't going to sell much. On the other hand, a "secret missile test [in broad daylight]" story is a good seller.

          So maybe: the armed forces/DoD/Pentagon didn't do it. The news media don't care because they realize they didn't do it, and a story about a jet taking off isn't very interesting. So it only took 36 hours for a random guy to put all the pieces together and give a good answer.

        • by Wannabe Code Monkey ( 638617 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:33PM (#34200434)

          So yeah, if you believe that the government can create that good of a cover story with that much independent evidence in a 36 hour period, well, you have more faith in government agencies than I do.

          That's the bizarre thing - why did it take 36 hours to get an answer and why didn't the definitive answer come from a definitive source?

          So it was flight 808. Either the DoD and FAA were unable to figure that out in short order or else they just don't care about giving the public answers to those kind of questions.

          Neither one of those possibilities is particularly good.

          The comments in the original slashdot story had people saying it was the contrail of an airliner. I believe someone even linked to someones blog who had done a lot of leg work and found that it was flight 808 and even compared it to a similar sighting on 2009-12-31. For some reason the news media didn't want to actually investigate this even though all the facts were out there.

      • by interkin3tic ( 1469267 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:02PM (#34200022)

        So yeah, if you believe that the government can create that good of a cover story with that much independent evidence in a 36 hour period, well, you have more faith in government agencies than I do.

        Alternatively, you consider that the government is -so- incompetent that they scheduled a secret missile test right when there would be a plane scheduled to fly along that same trajectory. The missile actually failed to get off the ground, and it just took the government 36 hours to realize it never left and they too were actually looking at a plane.

        After dealing with the DMV, I consider this the most likely explanation.

    • by betterunixthanunix ( 980855 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:53PM (#34200700)
      Exactly what incident would you be referring to? The launch of an ICBM 35 miles from LA that almost nobody in LA is an eyewitness to? There is a time to criticize the government for lying to us, but this really is not it...
  • Oops (Score:5, Insightful)

    by falldeaf ( 968657 ) <falldeaf@gmail.PLANCKcom minus physicist> on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:41PM (#34199738) Homepage
    I wonder if that UN Ambassador feels silly about his comment that it was probably a display of power aimed at asian nations... Why would the military perform a missile launch to beat their chest then deny that they did it? XD This news is going to be devastating to conspiracy theorists. No wait, denial and facts fuel that fire, nevermind.
  • Dag-nabbit. (Score:5, Informative)

    by blair1q ( 305137 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:42PM (#34199756) Journal

    The picture fooled me, too.

    And I ignored myself when I wondered why the plume wasn't all twisted up. Missile trails go through the different layers of atmosphere and pull in different directions. Like this:

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/09/17/article-1214076-06756E3E000005DC-858_306x438.jpg [dailymail.co.uk]

    • Re:Dag-nabbit. (Score:4, Informative)

      by guru42101 ( 851700 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:47PM (#34199826)
      Watching the news a few days ago they had a video of it. They're sitting they're talking about how they don't know what it is. I'm watching the video with red and green alternating lights wondering if idiocracy is already here.
    • by SmallFurryCreature ( 593017 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:50PM (#34199862) Journal

      What however I usually find most intresting is the story behind the story.

      Why did it take this long and an amateur to figure it all out? Why wasn't CBS called within minutes of the airing that this was nothing, that aircraft X flying from Y and landing at Z at XX:XX was it, that radar had it on track the whole time and that this flight passes over daily and does pretty much the same thing?

      It shows a kink in the line of communication somewhere that this was cleared up almost immediately. And no, I am not saying the US military HAS to answer every question, but when a story breaks out like this and reaches around the globe, the military should have a better answer then "we don't what it is, we are fairly certain it wasn't our missle, but what it was, we don't know".

      For everyone who thinks the Chinese would for instance NOT have dared to fire a missle this close as a show of power. The USA with Bomber Harris send US bomber aircraft capable of carrying nukes on flights over Russia. Do you think the US has a monopoly on mad men?

      That it was nothing does not mean it will always be nothing and why does the military get so much of the US taxpayers money if they can't even tell us what was flying over California?

      • by idontgno ( 624372 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:00PM (#34199992) Journal

        It shows a kink in the line of communication somewhere that this was cleared up almost immediately. And no, I am not saying the US military HAS to answer every question, but when a story breaks out like this and reaches around the globe, the military should have a better answer then "we don't what it is, we are fairly certain it wasn't our missle, but what it was, we don't know".

        It took the Air Force 18 years to tell itself and its commanders that UFOs were just optical illusions and weather balloons. And they still haven't officially told the public-at-large anything.

        If it's not a threat, and it has no potential as a military technology or other funding source, it's not interesting. It has other things to do, specifically those involving threats, operations, or funding sources. I mean advanced technology development.

        I can't get my cats interested in The Discovery Channel or Slashdot, either. But they are very keenly interested in when I open a can of soup (or, as far as they know, possibly canned cat food). Pretty much the same phenomenon.

    • by LWATCDR ( 28044 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:56PM (#34199950) Homepage Journal

      Not always I can tell you that a shuttle launch looks a lot like that was shown. ICBM test flights and Probably SLBM test flights will often corkscrew early in flight to eat up some range.
      What no one is getting is that this almost as worrisome as if it was a missile.
      That plane was coming into the US from from the Pacific Ocean. It crossed into US airspace from outside US airspace. Yes I know that Hawaii is part of the US but our airspace doesn't extend the entire distance.
      So why did it take the DOD and FAA so long to find out what it was. I mean really they knew what time the video was taken so why couldn't they just punch up it was FLTxxx at FLx?
      That is what worries me. Does the US have air defense to speak of?

      • Re:Dag-nabbit. (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:22PM (#34200294)

        Depends on what you mean by air defense. If you mean an automated system that can shoot down ballistic missiles then no. There has been work on that off and on, that's what the whole "Star Wars" project is/was. However nothing operational at this point, or at least nothing that is admitted to (and that is the kind of system where publicly admitting it is useful).

        In terms of defense against air attacks? Yes, tons. The US has a bunch of air bases all around its borders. The Air Force and Air National Guard operated bases in most states with fighters (F-16s and F-22s mostly) to deal with threats. In terms of tracking incoming craft, that is done on a continuous basis by massive radar installations. The PAVE PAWS radar arrays provide complete coverage of the US borders out to very long distances (like 3000km). All inbound craft are tracked and known.

        So what's the deal here? Well the deal is nothing happened, that's what. There was nothing out of the ordinary so nobody noticed anything. All commercial flights are well known. They file flight plans, keep ground controllers appraised of their progress, and show up on civilian radar. See the radar you get at airports actually isn't normal radar. It doesn't track any object in the sky, it is Secondary Surveillance Radar. Rather what it is doing is looking for transponders. All commercial and private planes have to have one that say who they are. So what happens, more or less, is the radar says "Hi who are you?" and the plane responds "This is my callsign." Works great and makes tracking much easier, you don't have to have someone analyze the radar signals to tell if they are real returns or not (radar can get returns off of birds, air currents, etc if the power is high enough) and you can keep easy track of what everything is.

        A plane that has an active transponder and a known flight plan is nothing out of the ordinary. There are thousands a day. So nobody takes any notice, that is shit working how it should. So when the military was asked "Did you do this?" they truthfully answered "No we didn't." When the FAA was asked "Did you see anything weird?" they again truthfully said "No we didn't." Because neither had seen anything weird, no evidence of any problems, they didn't go digging. The military isn't going to go all crazy because there is a picture of a contrail. The PAVE PAWS in Beale didn't see anything problematic, who gives a shit?

        I am guessing IUSS was also clear of any unknown subs and so on.

        Nobody noticed anything because there was nothing to notice, except visually, and neither the DOD or FAA check that because it isn't useful. Everything in terms of monitoring was fine. They may have opened an inquiry in to what happened so they could give people an answer, but that can take time since it isn't high priority and you want to give a correct answer. Or they may have just not given a shit since it was clearly just someone who'd snapped a picture of a jet and didn't know what it was. They knew it was NOT a missile as that would have been tracked.

        • by EdIII ( 1114411 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @04:16PM (#34200916)

          Reading your well articulated post has had a quite calming affect. Your logical and reasoned argument is beginning melt away the conspiracy theory tension in my shoulders... and I think it is lowering my blood pressure.

          I don't like it. Get the fuck out of here :)

    • Re:Dag-nabbit. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by DerekLyons ( 302214 ) <fairwater.gmail@com> on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:28PM (#34200378) Homepage

      The picture fooled me, too.

      Didn't fool me for a second - because it looked pretty much like a contrail and exactly nothing like a rocket launch.
       
      What we have here is a classic case of sensationalism and the power of suggestion and preconceived notions over common sense and stopping to think. The news said it was a missile - and a lot of people became convinced it was a missile rather than asking themselves whether the news was right or not. Even a lot of otherwise intelligent people went along with that conclusion because it agreed with their anti-government/pro-government-conspiracy beliefs.

  • by h00manist ( 800926 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:43PM (#34199784) Journal
    Why? Simple. It's more fun that way. There is NO excitement in the version saying it's a damned routine flight. That version is a national security threat. Millions of people will die as a result. Of boredom.

    Therefore, it was a missile. Chinese. Communist party. War tensions abound. Obama is negotiating terms with Hu Jintao at this very moment, supposedly over the econonomic issues. Saving millions, billions even! from certain death.
  • by MrEricSir ( 398214 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:44PM (#34199798) Homepage

    It's gotta be a weather balloon that just happens to be shaped like a missile.

  • by seven of five ( 578993 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:49PM (#34199850)
    Didn't this appear to rise from the Pacific? How would a plane, flying high over the Pacific and heading to Phoenix, produce a contrail that rises from the Pacific heading west?
  • by Teun ( 17872 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:49PM (#34199852) Homepage
    I am very interested if he addresses the apparently single contrail, most airliners I see have distinct trails per engine or at least per wing.
  • by digitaldc ( 879047 ) * on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:51PM (#34199876)
    We still can't identify a regular commercial airplane flight.
    • by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:58PM (#34199962) Homepage

      I assume that by "we" you mean CBS news.

      • by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:31PM (#34200418)

        If indeed this was just a commercial flight, as it seems to be, the whole reason nobody noticed is BECAUSE it was just a regular commercial flight. Those what two things that make them of no interest:

        1) A filed flight plan. They tell ground controllers where they are going and when. That means that their appearance there is nothing to worry about, and barely anything to take note of. You only take note if they AREN'T there.

        2) A transponder. Civilian radar doesn't detect objects by direct radar returns, it does it by transponder returns. More or less the plane will say hi, tell you who it is, and even tell you shit like altitude. When a plane is doing this, and it is where it is supposed to be, nobody worries because that is what it is supposed to do.

        I'm quite sure the FAA (or rather the ground controllers at relevant airports) identified the flight just fine... and paid it no mind other than to talk to it when it was landing. It was a plane where its flight plan said it was supposed to be, showing up on radar like it should, and communicating via radio. That is not only a non-event, it is a non-event that happens a thousand times a day.

    • by interkin3tic ( 1469267 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:03PM (#34200050)

      I don't think "handheld camera" qualifies as "all our technology."

  • by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:52PM (#34199900) Homepage

    ...the hell I won't.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:53PM (#34199906)

    Missiles move a lot faster than that. Looking at ICBM speeds [wikipedia.org] it appears that they typically move their first 150km to 400km at 7km/s and the last 100km at up to 4km/s. The longest phase (the intercontinental part) is claimed to be typically about 25 minutes, which is also obviously damn fast.

    Now, you can give or take there but the guy who originally shot the video said that he looked at it for about 10 minutes. Using any of those speeds, 10 minutes would be 4200km, 2400km or about half of a flight from one continent to another. So he looked at something far, far slower. Pentagon or any other government agency didn't claim to know anything about it. There were no news about missiles hitting any part of the country... It is absurd that the "news" channels jumped on the missile -story.

  • Plane Finder (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Fartypants ( 120104 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:53PM (#34199912)

    I was going to say this would been much easier if the Plane Finder AR iphone and android app wasn't labeled "an aid to terrorists" [techdirt.com] and removed from app stores, but it looks like you can still get it [pinkfroot.com]. There's a web version too at www.planefinder.net

  • by assertation ( 1255714 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:54PM (#34199918)

    Isn't anyone else bothered that the military couldn't identify it?

  • by JoelWink ( 1846354 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:55PM (#34199926)
    I think one aspect of this story that hasn't been mentioned is the fact that daylight savings time kicked in the previous day. So, let's say this is a regular weekday flight that arrives in Phoenix in the early evening. After the November 7th "fall back" daylight savings time change, this flight, which may have passed over L.A. in bright daylight on Friday November 5th, is now illuminated on Monday November 8th with dramatic dusk lighting, resulting in a very different looking contrail.
  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna ( 970587 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @02:55PM (#34199936) Journal
    All those big name news outfits, CBS or FOX or what not, they are in the business of selling ad time. Digging and finding the truth costs money and produces uninteresting information. "Was there a mystery missile? Film at 11" collects eye-balls and sells ads. The amateur on the other hand does not have any incentive to hype the mystery and in fact has an incentive to debunk the myth. So he got it. Way to go.

    Wish there are more such amateurs tracking the money and misinformation spread by everyone about politics.

  • by spectrokid ( 660550 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:01PM (#34200004) Homepage
    Head over to Jon Stewart. His coverage is, as always, hilarious. The guy who saw it followed it for ten minutes. Do the math: 10 minutes x Mach 4 =...
  • by adenied ( 120700 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @03:06PM (#34200076)

    It's a streetlight!

    Oh wait, wrong website.

  • The Truth (Score:3, Funny)

    by Kaenneth ( 82978 ) on Thursday November 11, 2010 @04:11PM (#34200872) Homepage Journal

    It's ghouls, I tell you. Religious ghouls in rockets, looking for a land to call their own.

    Don't you laugh at me! I know a spell that'll make you show your true form! A cave rat taught it to me.

//GO.SYSIN DD *, DOODAH, DOODAH

Working...