Canonical Seeks $32 Million To Make Ubuntu Smartphone 267
nk497 writes "Canonical has kicked off a crowdfunding campaign to raise $32 million in 30 days to make its own smartphone, called Ubuntu Edge, that can also hook up to a monitor and be used as a PC. If it meets its funding target on Indiegogo, the Ubuntu Edge is scheduled to arrive in May 2014. To get one, backers must contribute $600 (£394) on the first day or $810 (£532) thereafter. Canonical will only make 40,000 of the devices."
Why? ~nt~ (Score:2, Insightful)
~nt~
Re:Why? ~nt~ (Score:4, Insightful)
I guess Shuttleworth is tired of spending his own money on developing tech nobody wants.
Re:Why? ~nt~ (Score:5, Insightful)
There are plenty of us who want Linux Mint [linuxmint.com] and easy to use Linux. The mere fact that Shuttleworth went off on a weird Unity loop and left it for others to commercialise the technology he originally developed doesn't mean we don't want or shouldn't recognise his vision and financial contribution. I think that going direct to the contribution page [indiegogo.com] and booking a cool new Linux device doesn't sound like a major pain for a bunch of us.
If people keep buying the interesting new Linux directed devices then this will keep the hardware designers making them. That can never be bad.
Re:Why? ~nt~ (Score:4, Interesting)
Not to mention that with a device based on a more "standard" Linux, booting other "standard" Linux platforms should actually be a fairly painless step.
Re:Why? ~nt~ (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know about anybody else, but I expect that society should be giving us all more for less as progress results in more reward for less input, and there's more to go around. The sad thing is, wages don't even need to keep up with productivity, or at least they don't have to advance as quickly, in order to represent satisfactory progress.
Re: (Score:3)
So you can have your computer in your pocket all the time! Think of it:
1. No more storing your data on crappy services like Dropbox or Google Drive. Now it's just in your pocket, everywhere!
2. Use the same apps on the phone as on the desktop! The only difference is the input and output!
3. Hook up your phone to any desktop that has a monitor, keyboard, and mouse (but for some reason no computer)!
For those who haven't caught on, this whole post was sarcasm.
Re:Why? ~nt~ (Score:5, Funny)
You forgot the best feature:
4. When your phone is misplaced or stolen, your data automatically transitions from pocket data to somewhere data.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you not have backups?
Back it up like you would any other device.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why? ~nt~ (Score:5, Interesting)
Posted without sarcasm:
1. Maybe there won't be the quid pro quo of all of your private information so you can use the "free" apps
2. Perhaps your carrier won't be able to dive into your phone and change any old setting they desire
3. With luck, maybe your apps won't have obscene data needs that can be sold on the open market for bigdamndata engines
4. And maybe we can have apps that just do something, rather then the crippled-til-you-pay model.
But Canonical hasn't guaranteed anything, and the carriers won't love them unless Canonical allows them to feed their shareholders, so it's unlikely as a result that carriers will want the devices to market in the first place.
Oh, wait.....
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course you would be able to use Dropbox and friends, but you can do that today on any of the smartphones already available.
I've yet to see a single app scale well to not only screen size, but also input method (mouse vs touch). Not that it is impossible, but app developers seem hard-pressed to cope with simple resolution and screen changes... throw in a mouse and keyboard and all bets are off.
Re: docking station. In the very old days when laptops had horrendous screens and there was nothing like USB (or
Re: (Score:2)
I can type on the Nexus on-screen keyboard, even though I don't like it much. If I could plug the thing into a docking station of some type (USB or otherwise) then I can touch type 40+ WPM. I don't use the laptop docking station on my desk, which adds two monitors, an ergonomic keyboard (ick), and a mouse, but my coworker does (he does a different job than I do).
Anyway, my ideal device is a Nexus 7 form factor, w
Re: (Score:2)
Toshiba has the Thrive with dock. The dock takes a microSD, Mini USB, Mini-phone Audio, Power Input, and HDMI Digital Audio/Video. It can of course use a Bluetooth keyboard, so you don't really need a dock for that :) The Thrive is an Android 3.2 beast, and at least some models can be rooted.
Re: (Score:2)
Publicity, or at I least I hope so.
He could pay for the whole thing himself, and nobody would buy it. If, on the other hand, he mostly fund it himself through puppets on IGG, it will get widespread praise for breaking all sorts of records, listening to the people. It will also give the idea that people want this, so people will actually want this.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Here are 3 reasons why IMO:
1. Apple products are good, but expensive
2. Android products are cheaper, but the lack of standards causes all kinds of platform development issues. Personally, I've also had issues with performance and stability.
3. A new platform can sell itself as THE privacy option. Give users more control or access over the platform to see what applications and the OS is up to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why? ~nt~ (Score:4, Insightful)
Canonical is making 40,000 phones at most, so that's too few to get a bulk discount. I think $830 is a reasonable price. However, I don't have $830 handy, or $600. Or $60. I have debt and kids that need to visit an orthodontist. So I'm out.
For 32 million i want it to make coffee (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Actual Link (Score:5, Informative)
Actual link to indiegogo page, which is missing from FTS
http://igg.me/at/ubuntuedge [igg.me]
Re: (Score:3)
Also, it's worth pointing out that 32 million is 3 times the largest successfully crowd funded project ever. This will never happen, especially since indiegogo has way less than half the financial user base of kickstarter.
Re: (Score:2)
Basic math (Score:2)
In order to meet the target, they have to sell at least 38096 of those 40,000 phones after the first day, and 1906 on the first. They have to sell at least 39,507 of them to meet their goal, if they're all at the higher price.
Ambitious goals.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
still more than Windows Phone 8 managed.... :)
Re: (Score:2)
From the sell-them-all scenario: 38096 * $810 + 1904 * $600 = $32,000,160. Selling one more at the $600 level means they miss their goal.
From the sell-as-few-as-possible scenario: 39507 * $810 = $32,000,670. They can only have 493 phones unsold at the end of the campaign for it to meet the goal.
With regards to the necessary correction, I need to work on my remembering-numbers-while-switching-tabs skills.
Re: (Score:2)
With regards to the necessary correction, I need to work on my remembering-numbers-while-switching-tabs skills.
Yeah. Since I've got a 20" monitor, I've started opening two browser windows for this very reason. Copy/paste is nice but sometimes it's better to have information side-by-side in a similar size.
I've tried using it with a second screen (the laptop screen) but it is just too tiny for side-by-side comparisons.
-l
/insert comment about only-having-a-13"-laptop-screen-you-insensitive-clod here
Don't need (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you use the built-in data encrypt option it will wipe your data quite thoroughly. You internal SD card is also an EXT based file syste, and you can wipe it using a USB link to a Linux machine if you wish.
Re: (Score:2)
1 mil per day?! (Score:2)
No keyboard? No Thanks! (Score:2)
It's not a good form factor like the Psion Revo or HP 200LX. I don 't think I really want another smartphone, I barely use the three that I have.
Looks nice but bridges burnt? (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem is that the 'enthusiasts' who would be contributing to this have just recently had several slaps to the face from Canonical in the form of window buttons, unity, unity & unity. And amazon shopping lenses. 'This is not a democracy' is still rings in the ears. Now Canonical realise that they need the enthusiasts, who's toes they stepped on, to help with this venture into the mobile space.
To be honest, I hope they succeed. I think the concept of a phone that doubles as a desktop could very well be the future of the desktop computer for many people. The hardware also looks very nice (which is a necessity to tempt anyone off android/ios) - I agree with Shuttleworth that mobile screen resolution is getting out of hand, and I'd much rather the colourful OLED displays than the ridiculously high res LCDs (which then look laggy because the graphics can't keep up - see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmywUhu2Pus [youtube.com]) and a sapphire glass screen sounds interesting (though will it be as strong as gorilla glass - I doubt it).
I wonder how many of us would have paid up if Nokia had done this with the N950?
Re: (Score:3)
a sapphire glass screen sounds interesting (though will it be as strong as gorilla glass - I doubt it)
Depends on your definition of "strong." If you're going to drop your phone and have it impact a hard surface, then the gorilla glass is probably superior. If you're going to stick the phone in your pocket next to your keys, the sapphire will be FAR superior, unless you have a diamond-studded keychain. Sapphire is very difficult to scratch due to its hardness.
Re: (Score:2)
Keys will not scratch a decent smartphone anyway. They are made of very soft metal. Gorilla glass is pretty brittle too. Harder than sand is what we need.
Re:Looks nice but bridges burnt? (Score:5, Interesting)
Keep in mind that the enthusiasts for this project go beyond the Ubuntu Desktop OS enthusiasts. I am a dedicated Ubuntu Desktop OS hater. I'm a Linux Mint guy myself. But I want to see a pure Linux desktop OS succeed on mobile, because it opens the door for others to follow. Rooting your Ubuntu Phone could create a massive amount of ROM flashing options.
The phone that launches a full desktop when docked (and has 128 GB of storage!) is a game changer in the mobile market. So, fanbois of any stripe can be an enthusiast for this project.
Re:Looks nice but bridges burnt? (Score:4, Interesting)
I will admit that if I see anyone with one of these Ubuntu phones, I'm going to be quite a smidgen jealous!
D
Re: (Score:2)
The phone that launches a full desktop when docked (and has 128 GB of storage!) is a game changer in the mobile market.
I don't know about it being a game changer, but it might.
There's been so many tech toys that have features that "will become a game changer" that I'm afraid all this will do will introduce a potentially useful new feature that nobody ever uses, thus stagnating like so many before it.
Think about it, how many devices with "game changing" features have you owned where that feature was nothing more than a rushed out, underdeveloped bullet point used by marketing?
I see lots of TV ads showing hip kids bumping
I want one..... (Score:4, Informative)
One of the first things I did with my android smartphone was plug in a USB keyboard and mouse and wonder why they didn't "just work".
Re: sapphire: sapphire is one of the hardest materials there is, I think you could scratch the heck out of 'gorilla glass' with it. Just looked it up, gorilla glass has a "Vickers" hardness of 701 (max) vs. sapphire, at 2300.
That said, sapphire is more brittle and crack-prone, however. Apparently gorilla glass is treated to stop crack propagation. It's quite possible a hammer-blow that wouldn't damage gorilla glass would smash sapphire.
--PM
If Nokia had done it for the N950 I'd've paid (Score:2)
...or not (Score:2)
"Canonical has kicked off a crowdfunding campaign to raise $32 million in 30 days to make its own smartphone, called Ubuntu Edge, that can also hook up to a monitor and be used as a PC."
Or, alternatively, some other shit:
"Specifications are subject to change."
So, you know, you could really wind up with anything. The campaign keeps talking about a prototype device, but unless I'm missing it, none of the videos actually shows a working phone - the brief plug-in desktop demo in the 'introducing the hardware' v
They just crossed 1M$ already! (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd rather updated OpenWebOS on good hardware (Score:2)
A shame what happened there.
Because ubuntu users don't already have a desktop (Score:2)
Re:Why no direct link ? (Score:5, Insightful)
How can PCPro get page hits and ad impressions by linking to the IndieGoGo page?
Re: (Score:2)
I vaguely remember them claiming we would have been running this already by now.. I mean, if they really had the sw stack plunked down..
they're outright liars though as a whole, though maybe in their minds just "optimists". the concept itself isn't impossible, but I'd rather see the sw stack run first on something like asus padfone - and well, quite frankly, running something else than ubuntu.
"All of the funding we receive goes directly towards producing the device for expected delivery in May 2014. The onl
Re:Too much bullshit from Canonical (Score:5, Informative)
I am writing this comment on a Dell that came with Ubuntu preinstalled.
Re: (Score:3)
I am writing this comment on a Dell that came with Ubuntu preinstalled.
What is this? A voice of reason and fact? I insist you take back your harsh statement and engage in fallacy and untruth!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm responding to your comment on a budget Dell desktop that came with Ubuntu preinstalled. I used to have
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Too much bullshit from Canonical (Score:5, Insightful)
It works great if the risk taker is poor or middle class and cash strapped, and I think that's what it is (or should be) intended for. Otherwise, I agree, it's ridiculous for a billionaire to use this method for funding, but that's why he's a billionaire (along with all the other billionaires). It's because he knows how to work the system and has few scruples.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Too much bullshit from Canonical (Score:5, Informative)
Canonical has bullshitted too much in the past to be taken seriously about this. Several times, they've announced that new products from major vendors (Asus, Dell) would run their version of Linux. Never happened. They need to STFU until the product ships.
Who is voting up this dumbass?
http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/os-applications/w/wiki/3685.dell-xps-13-laptop-developer-edition-a-client-to-cloud-solution-project-sputnik.aspx [dell.com]
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009F1I16K/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B009F1I16K&linkCode=as2&tag=wwwcanoniccom-20#productDetails [amazon.com]
Re:Too much bullshit from Canonical (Score:4, Informative)
i noticed alienware has the choice of ubuntu -- alienware is owned by dell and is their 'gaming' model line http://www.dell.com/us/p/alienware-x51-r2/pd.aspx [dell.com]
Re: (Score:2)
[citation needed]
Re:Too much bullshit from Canonical (Score:5, Insightful)
I think the crowd funding is great for projects where the person would have no way to fund the project on their own, but these private for profit businesses doing this is ridiculous, they want no risk but all the profit and glory.
I know double fine did it(I even supported it) but at least you can see where they are going with not going with a publisher
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Too much bullshit from Canonical (Score:4, Informative)
Could you link to those announcements please?
There are lots of Canonical announcements about machines coming preloaded with Unbuntu. Not many shipments.
There are other tablet and phone Ubuntu announcements, which you can find with Google. Someone is taking "pre-orders" for a Ubuntu tablet for delivery in late 2013. [omgubuntu.co.uk]
Despite all their press releases, Canonical seems unable to get any manufacturer to ship a preloaded Ubuntu machine in volume.
Re:Too much bullshit from Canonical (Score:5, Informative)
Major OEMs (HP, Dell, etc) ship millions of computers with Ubuntu every year. The shipments are mostly to emerging markets (China, India...), which is why you don't see many machines in western (read: slashdot-reading) countries.
Source: I am affiliated with that effort
Re: (Score:3)
I don't really understand the crowdfunding craze.
Yeah, that's pretty clear.
The idea with capitalism...
...is orthogonal to crowdsourcing. Under capitalism, individuals own property. That's it. They're free to use that property (including money) to make more money if they so choose, or they can make their own deals to trade for something else. With crowdfunding, a bunch of people put their money into a pool that is then used to fulfill some purpose, such as tooling manufacturers and setting up supply lines to produce a phone.
This does not require a middleman, and in fact the exact sa
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, you didn't get the memo. Since Bill the Borg disappeared from /. we've moved on from hating on Micro$oft. We're supposed to hate on Canonical now. So whether or not it's their fault, blame anonical.
Re: (Score:3)
I didn't get the memo either. Are we still allowed to hate Larry Ellison?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Since when is the hardware open? They've stated no such thing. It's going to have proprietary drivers and fitmware like every pther phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly did Microsoft "steal" from Ubuntu? The entire Metro UI and its live tiles, etc. predates Unity.
Re: (Score:2)
The specs on that thing are a total joke.
It might have been interesting 3 years ago.
I want super phone specs and FOSS drivers. Preferably in the mainline kernel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In 2010 that would not have been the fastest processor either. The specs were ho hum even then.
I believe the GP was suggesting it today.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Did you even click on any of the links? The top result is the Wikipedia page on Canonical.
I will summarize for you: Their business model: selling services. They wanna be like: Red Hat. Profits: none yet, but Shuttleworth says they are getting close to break-even.
"In a Guardian interview in May 2008, Mark Shuttleworth said that the Canonical business model was service provision and explained that Canonical was not yet close to profitability. Canonical also claimed it will wait for the business to turn into a
Re: (Score:2)
If they would stop doing dumb shit with their server platform they would already be making money. Of course these days even RHEL wants to have a splashscreen instead of a boot you can watch.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Last time we played around with getting service contracts for it we installed 10.04 and it had the splash boot, you could turn it off but that was a pretty bad sign.
It also wanted to install X and a bunch of other horseshit that does not belong on a server. Since then I have played around with the alternate CD, but i am not sure they support that.
Re:Crowdfunding?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, how dare companies attempt to crowd source things! Damn, I just put up $200 to a Japanese animation studio so they could extend a sequel to a short they did, what madness is this!? Haven't people realized that rather than showing support for things they like and want, they should just shut up and take what's given to them?
Obviously, we're all supposed to just buy whatever Android, iOS, or Windows Phone is on the market. Choice? What nonsense!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And in the end I'll get a product! Holy shit, it's like there's an actual transaction taking place!
But it's not a gift!
Are you offering something in return? Somehow I doubt it!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Legally it isn't even a gift, as it's taxed at disbursement time.
I expect something in return. I am not guaranteed to get it. And if I don't, then I will keep that in mind if they ever try to do another kickstarter type project. It's an investment in whatever the person who started the drive is pitching, and the ultimate cost is in their reputation. Succeed and your reputation looks good, fail and people will que
Re: (Score:2)
"Holy shit, it's like there's an actual transaction taking place!"
I have no points, but that's friggin funny.
Thanks for the laugh.
Re: (Score:2)
Except with crowd funding, you don't find out if you "like and want" the product until AFTER you've spent your money on it, when it's too late. You're just throwing money at a name...
With crowd funding, there's no motivation to make a good product, just one that barely meets the promised specifications, while spending as little of that advance money as possible.
The
Re: (Score:2)
And they are putting their reputation on the line.
Or sometimes the product is already done and designed, but the funding will allow for addition of a few features and an actual production run. If they can meet what they promise and still show a profit, well, good for them I suppose.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't the ride why they contribute in the first place?
I doubt many people contribute to make a profit.
Re: (Score:2)
Someone who wants to live in a world where the product they're proposing to build exists, I'd expect?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As an individual, I cannot invest in that manner. I can only hope that my interests align with the investors at some point and I get what I want. But rarely does that ever actually happen.
Crowdfunding is unrelated to investing, but it does let me push towards the goal of getting what I want when all the investors turn it away because the return on investment isn't a percentage they approve of
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I find it shocking that a web site (this one) with so many smart people having discussions can, at the same time, also be host to so many people who don't understand the basics about how money works. We've got crowdsourcing, bitcoin...
Re: (Score:2)
Private, for-profit companies have been doing pre-orders for years. There's nothing new here.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Because every company needs investors, right? Why can't those investors just be the first customers looking to get in early? How is this a bad thing?
What the fuck does this matter? Isn't something like this a perfect gauge for early-adopter interest?
Re:No thanks Gnome (Score:5, Insightful)
There is a lot wrong with android.
1. No good window managers, this means tiling and layering
2. Sudo not built in
3. Lack of normal linux desktop, including X. So I have to use VNC to get normal linux apps to display.
4. lack of decent package management. This means repositories and debs/rpms. This means being able to support dependencies.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Is the hypothetical Ubuntu smartphone worth this much? I can buy a Nexus 4 for half this price and hook it up to an HDMI monitor and a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse.
800. it's just a number they pulled out of their hat, really, since they have zero idea what hardware they will actually use and what it will cost. once they have the money(if they get it) they'll go shopping around china for a board + soc provider. even then the timeframe isn't realistic, especially if they promise to buy the fastest multicore arm chips available at that time(or the trick is in the "available", since that might mean higher end samsung/apple type of soc of _today_, since they wouldn't be a
Re: (Score:2)
Yes but the Ubuntu phone will turn into an Ubuntu Desktop when you plug it in.
Not a phone interface on a giant screen.