Canadian Military Developing Stealth Snowmobile 187
innocent_white_lamb writes "The Canadian military is currently testing a $620,000 hybrid-electric stealth snowmobile. Testing includes speed, towing capacity, endurance, mobility, usability, and of course, noise emissions. The testing and most other information about the stealth snowmobile is secret and very little information has been released other than the fact that it does exist. One document reads 'The noise level of an internal combustion engine cannot be reduced to an acceptable level for missions where covertness may be required, especially given the increased propagation of sound in cold, dry, Arctic air.' Therefore, National Defence's research agency is 'pursuing the development of a "silent" snowmobile for winter operations in Canada, specifically in the Arctic.' Michael Byers, an Arctic policy expert, questions the need for a stealth snowmobile. 'I don't see a whole lot of evidence that criminals and terrorists are scooting around Canada's North on snowmobiles and that we have to sneak up on them,' he said."
They did the impossible! (Score:5, Funny)
Step 1.
Paint it white.
Step 2.
Have a beer eh!
Re: (Score:2)
Show yer beaver, Canajians !!
Are you sure you want to see it? [youtube.com]
Three Canadians are in a boat fishing (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Three Canadians are in a boat fishing (Score:4, Interesting)
Not entirely unbelievable. A dive buddy of mine was doing some part time commercial dive work. One spring he was helping inspect the cooling water intakes for a steam plant in downtown Ottawa, near the river. Guess what he found up against one of the gratings. Yeah, a guy who'd gone through the ice on a snowmobile that winter.
Put him right off diving for a while, it did.
Re:Three Canadians are in a boat fishing (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Tonight on Top Gear (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Tonight on Top Gear (Score:4, Funny)
And then halfway through they completely fake the snowmobile failing and spend the rest of the episode poo pooing it over something that never actually happened.
Re: (Score:3)
wipe your chin, saying, "Mmmm.... best South African I ever tasted."?
I find your implication that connoisseur status be awarded those fond of fellatio to be enlightening. Perhaps making possible reality TV mashups where sex acts are constructed and sampled a-la Iron Chef. Oh sure, like any porn, it's all staged... That's the point though isn't it? Illuminating that vehicle porn is just as hokey as slice-of-life porn (reality TV), or any other such media with the label of porn.
See also: Geek Porn, like Myth Busters... Who's faux science is more fun to watch than anythin
Has Sarah Palin been alerted? (Score:2)
Commies to her right, stealth snowmobiles to her left. Does DEFCON go to 11?
Re:Has Sarah Palin been alerted? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, but her IQ does.
No, it doesn't. How she retained enough brains to keep breathing is beyond me.
Re: (Score:2)
that's being rather generous
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Has Sarah Palin been alerted? (Score:4, Informative)
Commies to her right, stealth snowmobiles to her left. Does DEFCON go to 11?
DEFCON 11 would be a state of peaceful tranquility unlike anything the world has seen since the dawn of humanity.
You're looking for DEFCON 1 [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and Sarah Palin would bite, hook line and sinker.
DEFCON 11: Let's disband the U.S. military! We could start with the NSA.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering that DEFCON counts *down* as danger becomes more imminent, level 11 (comatose) probably applies in her case.
Cross Country Skiing (Score:2)
has been used for arctic warfare for hundreds of years as a cheap, effective way of stealthily moving a snowy environment. Hopefully the stealth sled won't ruin those capabilities.
Re: (Score:2)
has been used for arctic warfare for hundreds of years as a cheap, effective way of stealthily moving a snowy environment. Hopefully the stealth sled won't ruin those capabilities.
Presumably they want something faster and with greater cargo capacity(with the expensive-but-punchy missiles you can get these days, a tank-killer wouldn't be out of the question), or with better margins for the contractor. Maybe both.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Plus, you can tow 10 skiers behind a snowmobile. And a dog team seems to meet most of your requirements. Depending on the size of missile you can strap to a dog.
In Soviet Russia [wikipedia.org], if you have the dog and the warhead you can skip the missile...
Re: (Score:2)
Arctic troops have been dragging anti-tank weapons around on sleds since... well the first time the Russians showed up in Finland with tanks. In the winter war they used a 20mm lahti which weighs about 150lbs with a few rounds of ammo on the sled. Modern anti-tank missile systems like the Spike weigh in the same class or less, and arctic troops are already familiar with transporting them on sleds.
Re: (Score:2)
I shot a lahti at the Reno machine gun shoot a few years ago.
Awesome rifle. Huge brass Finnish balls had to interfere with cross country skiing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Cross Country Skiing (Score:5, Interesting)
I dunno if you have any experience pulling an ahkio sled for several miles with a squad in rucks and overwhites, but it freaking SUCKS. Tennis rackets or white rockets, it doesn't matter, it is an awful experience. There has been no experience in my life (which has experienced some exhausting things) that made me more exhausted.
When some Canadian "Arctic policy expert" opines that no one needs a small, quiet, efficient prime mover because of a lack of "terrorists", I am reminded why no one asks "Arctic policy experts" about military matters. Same reason I don't ask soldiers about environmental policy.
Re: (Score:2)
When some Canadian "Arctic policy expert" opines that no one needs a small, quiet, efficient prime mover because of a lack of "terrorists", I am reminded why no one asks "Arctic policy experts" about military matters.
I don't think the "policy expert" is arguing against snowmobiles. I think the "policy expert" is questioning the value-for-money of 'stealth' snowmobiles costing a hundred times as much as the regular kind. The number of likely (or even unlikely) missions that can be fulfilled with a $600,000 snowmobile that couldn't be completed with a $6,000 snowmobile seems to be rather small.
At best, this is an attempted distraction from the current government's utter failure to adequately fund and equip the countr
Re:Cross Country Skiing (Score:5, Funny)
Yes. I was a hired mercenary for the dark ubergovernment of illuminati jews involved in countless illegal wars to advance the agenda of... i forget who. they gave us this big briefing and explained it all but they lost me when they started talking about how the CIA / Kennedys was trying to kill all the Christians AND topple the Godless regimes too. The intro video was good though.
Anywho... on the topic of military equipment and its use in advancing my jew banker / ubergovernment christian / corpotocracy / and communist new world order (which is tricky, as you can imagine) I would think my opinion SHOULD carry a little bit of weight. More so than say... yet another batshit insane conspiracy theorist or arctic policy expert. At least as it pertains to the ground soldier.
Re: (Score:2)
Having been in the high arctic (Baffin Island), in December, I have to say nothing beats a snowmobile pulling a komatik for moving across snow...
Re:Cross Country Skiing (Score:4, Interesting)
has been used for arctic warfare for hundreds of years as a cheap, effective way of stealthily moving a snowy environment. Hopefully the stealth sled won't ruin those capabilities.
Not always useful in the Canadian Arctic. Pack ice sometimes extends for miles out to sea. It's a maze of 3-10 metre ridges that are an absolute bitch to navigate. Trying to pull ammo and supplies through on skis would be absolute torture. Hell, just crossing on a snowmobile through the pack ice on each side of the bay in Cape Dorset (maybe a kilometre and a half) left me sweating like a horse in -25 degree weather.
There's not a lot of pack ice on the old Finnish/Soviet border....
Just remember (Score:2)
All efforts are lost if you're carrying your iPhone on a stealth-snowmobile. (It's a sticker)
"Expert" ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Michael Byers, an Arctic policy expert, questions the need for a stealth snowmobile. 'I don't see a whole lot of evidence that criminals and terrorists are scooting around Canada's North on snowmobiles and that we have to sneak up on them,'
Then Michael Byers is not quite the expert: when the ice cap in the North Pole shrinks or disappears completely, [wikipedia.org] a whole new theater will come into play. Claims have already been filed for integration of the North Arctic Ocean into their exclusive economic zones from several countries, including Canada. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
That might be why he said 'criminals and terrorists'.
If the various other disputed aquatic zones are anything to go by, it's a lot of dick waving and diplomatic grandstanding, the occasional shootout between somebody's probably-illegal fishing boat and somebody else's quite-possibly-trigger-happy coast guard, and not too much else.
There's a first time for everything, of course, but it'd have to be a pretty juicy territorial claim to be worth getting into an actual war over.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/darpa-wants-ultimate-technology-sensor-network-monitor-vast-arctic [networkworld.com] (03/20/12)
"DARPA wants the ultimate technology, sensor network to monitor the vast Arctic"
Under-ice awareness, surface awareness, unmanned autonomous systems, anti-submarine warfare - guess Canada is doing its part with snowmobile upgrades.
Re: (Score:2)
And you're gonna be damned glad they have that technology when this new uber-smart network becomes self aware, taps into the local cable feed and decides that it better stomp out the human race before something really bad happens.
You'll definitely want a stealth snowmobile. Mark my words.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
How many of those disputed aquatic zones contain some of the richest untapped oil deposits on the planet? Not to mention extremely lucrative new trade routes.
Make no mistake, there's going to be some serious guns brought to play in the fight to claim this newly accessible territory, both metaphorical and quite possibly literal.
Re: (Score:2)
Umm, que joke about not bringing a snowmobile to a gun fight?
Re: (Score:2)
We don't actually know because it's difficult to do a marine seismic survey when there is ice getting in the way.
Re:"Expert" ? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not about a war. It's about establishing sovereignty, and to maintain control over a territory you need to be police it.
The northwest passage is a big issue over whether it's international waters or Canadian waters. Not just because of potential oil drilling or fishing, but shipping is a big issue. It's a lot easier to ensure the shipping is done safely so a ton of oil isn't dumped on our coastline if we can police the waters. Security is also a concern as there's a lot of unpopulated places for smugglers to drop cargo or illegal immigrants.
A military grade stealth snowmobile is part of the bigger picture, it makes it easier to patrol the territory and search for smugglers or other criminals as well as shows we're taking that part of our territory seriously.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
As we speak, you need to transit via Greenland by plane to reach the far north, and you cen expect delays if there is a storm on the way.
Uh, no [firstair.ca]. We have domestic service. You can get charters to pretty much anywhere in the eastern Arctic from Iqaluit as well.
Some military flights to CFB Alert do pass through Greenland, but aside from that....
Re: (Score:2)
So does my brain hurt or are you starting to talk about tracking naughty planes with stealth electric snowmobiles, WHY?
This sounds more like a designed tender to feed money to an insider family company, already associated with the Canadian government, basically a tender only one company can win and where the research conducted can be used in other areas.
Seriously $620,000 dollar snowmobiles. OK so say a company of high tech snow mobilers. So say five thirty man platoons, each one needing a snowmobile an
Re: (Score:3)
Dude, the Far Canadian North is NOT used for smuggling anything in the country, it is just not economical.
Load a pallet of drugs onto a ship. Coast guard can't do anything because it's international waters.
When the coast is clear send in a smaller boat (or rendezvous with one) and dump it on the shore. Then hire a bunch of guys to ride in on snowmobiles and take it down south.
If you're shipping enough drugs or other contraband the low risk could make it economical.
Re: (Score:2)
smugglers to drop ... illegal immigrants.
I'm not sure you thought this all the way through. This is the arctic circle we're talking about, not Vancouver.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Your reading comprehension needs work. People are well aware of that motivation, especially in Canada.
It still doesn't mean it's an issue usefully addressed by a stealth snowmobile, which was Byers' point. It would make a lot more sense to deploy, say, ice-capable military ships (Canada doesn't really have any, yet), subs that can actually work under ice (the very modest Canadian sub fleet is diesel, and ill-suited for polar work), or long-endurance manned planes and/or aerial drones. The biggest problem
Re: (Score:2)
They're Canadian carrier-based fighters, but probably without the fighting.
Considering the sheer size of Canada's thermally-hostile northern regions, patrolling a territory with anything ground-based is impractical because of the amount of space to cover, and patrolling from the air leaves too long a delay between seeing something suspicious and being able to investigate it. What's effective is a combined force, using aircraft to survey the landscape for anything suspicious, and using ground craft for targe
Re: (Score:3)
This is the same army that isn't equipped with enough parkas and the like to monitor the north.
Besides that, it's just too bloody big and cold to effectively monitor. Canada and the US can't even secure the southern border well, it's much shorter, has civilization, better weather.
The biggest island up there is 3/4 the size of texas, with 10k population total (with over two thirds of that in one town). That works out to one person per every 20 square miles, if they were distributed evenly. In the middle of n
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I think that's why he failed. He's just an Arctic policy expert. Snowmobiles are excellent vehicles in any place where snow falls... and in Canadian winters, that's just about freakin' everywhere. It's not about the Arctic, this is about being able to fight a war in the wintertime better than anyone else can. Afghanistan gets snow in the winter, and snowmobiles get to drive just about anywhere, so avoid roadside bombs. They could have been very useful in Afghan winters for swift strike teams. If it s
Re: (Score:2)
Really? (Score:2)
Well, if you wanted it quiet, I don't think a muffler would really do it.
I suspect you'd have to put in a completely different engine.
I'm not giving a large probability to a pure electric for two reasons:
. . First, most batteries don't seem to do that well in the really cold environments. You know, like Canada and Alaska, among many others.
. . Second, batteries, especially ones designed for really cold places, just wouldn't give it much range, which w
Re: (Score:3)
Probably end up with a small internal combustion engine generator of some sort feeding and electric motor. Shouldn't be too hard to muffle the noise if you can keep the RPMs down to a reasonable range. I'm not sure how you block the IR signature. Any combustion based motor is going to bright lite a FLIR system. Maybe the Canadians will get clever - use it to heat beer* (or is that just the English?).
*Beer is consumed, IR blocked by body and whatever insulation the human is wearing. Added bonus is that
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"I'm not sure how you block the IR signature"
Probably the same way aircraft deal with limiting their thermal signature, they pull in air and mix it with their jet exhaust. I believe they also try to extend some bulkheads or cowlings over the engines to prevent them, or the exhaust immediately exiting the engine, from being directly seen. And not that I particular like the hybrid-electric rig for a snowmobile, but pairing a rather small but efficient electric generator (running gas/diesel/kerosene/etc) wit
Bow before the power! (Score:2)
Here's a tip to move this along... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The money was spent finding the right shade of white.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the frigates are a specific colour of grey to hide optically in Canadian waters.
From a distance you can't see them.
Canadian soverignty (Score:2)
Canada has concerns about protecting the sovereignty of its arctic territories. Snowmobiles could prove useful in that.
Battle for the Arctic heats up [www.cbc.ca]
Defending our sovereignty in the Arctic [ucalgary.ca]
Why everyone wants a piece of the Arctic [macleans.ca]
Well, of course . . . (Score:2)
You don't poke a turd without getting shit on your finger,
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong thread . . . . 8(
When they invade Minnesota... (Score:2)
In relared news ... (Score:2)
Take into account... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
That's one long running joke. We sure fooled them!
Hybrid-Electric? (Score:2)
A hybrid-electric snowmobile seems a bit excessive if you're just trying to make it more stealthy. Switching up from a two cycle to a four cycle, adding some soundproofing and extending the muffler system would make one pretty quiet but not cost much as most of it would be off the shelf tech and would probably extend the range by using a more efficient engine and keeping the weight low. You're going to lose a bit of performance but that is always to be expected when going for stealth.
Stealth Snowmobile (Score:2)
Only $620,000 (Score:2)
I mean we're canadians we should have the best damn snowmobiles for our army money could by, i'd rather spend the cash on that than those crappy jets the US is pushing on us or spending the money sending our people to some 3rd world shit hole helping solve problems created by americans
The strategic maple syrup reserve... (Score:5, Funny)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_of_Quebec_Maple_Syrup_Producers#Strategic_reserve [wikipedia.org]
Man, they can *have* Alaska. (Score:2)
They wouldn't even have to ask twice.
Why isn't this a private industry project? (Score:2)
Snowmobiles are irritatingly noisy. for homeowners in Arctic regions, for animals in their native habitats, for hunters or photographers exploring those regions, and even for kids and hobbyists tooling around for fun, reducing the noise impact of snowmobiles would be very useful. A much quieter snowmobile would have a ready market, as long as it wasn't ridiculously expensive.
That raises the question of "Why isn't there already a privately built such vehicle?". Do they face the problem we in IT constantly se
Protect the syrup (Score:3)
After Spectre or whoever heisted their Strategic Maple Syrup Reserve [slashdot.org] last year, it only makes sense to beef up their military. To do any less would be irresponsible.
After all, next time it might be C.O.B.R.A. Make sure to load those snowmobiles with parachutes.
Re:Stealth schmealth (Score:4, Insightful)
Stealth moose already exist. And they can be more effective at taking out an unsuspecting vehicle than a Predator drone...
Re: (Score:3)
Stealth moose already exist. And they can be more effective at taking out an unsuspecting vehicle than a Predator drone...
My money's on the stealth polar bears.
Re: (Score:2)
If Sarah Palin can find them, they can't be THAT stealthy...
You don't get it. After living around Sarah Palin, that moose decided to commit suicide.
Re: (Score:2)
Or it failed in its mission...
Re: (Score:2)
That was it's mission: to destabilize the political climate by giving her an aura of expertise that would appeal to her voter base. A false flag political self-martyrdom.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Greetings from the Frozen North. (Score:2)
Not to be mean but the USA exported some government procurement accountants to Canada. That is why Canada spent $250 million modifying an ice breaker design that they bought the plans for $20 million for a boat most shipyards spend $100 million building.
$640,000 to design it but each sled will cost $3 million and require a $1 million dollars annually for maintence.
By the way thank you for purchasing our exported talent.
Re: Greetings from the Frozen North. (Score:5, Informative)
By the way thank you for purchasing our exported talent.
Just repayment for all those ex-Avro aerospace engineers that helped put Apollo on the moon.
Re: (Score:3)
There's one government near me that's spent more than all that put together try to fix an IBM provided payroll system.
Re: (Score:2)
Not to point too fine a point on it, but our "friendly" neighbour to the south thinks it owns part of the arctic and can operate there without impunity.
We need to be able to patrol it. Helicopters and Snowcats are not cost-effective patrol vehicles. We also need under-ice sensing and patrol capabilities.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I hope they do decide against the F-35 contract. It's ridiculously overpriced for our military, especially given that the F-35s aren't even all that well designed for frozen-weather operations.
Personally, I think Boeing's Super Hornets are a much better offer [www.cbc.ca]. Half the projected price, bigger control surfaces for easier landings on ice and better agility in the air, and two engines so that if one stalls in the cold the other can keep the plane going.
Re:Canada soon invades the US (Score:5, Funny)
Don't worry, we are already working on a defense, called global warming.
Re: (Score:2)
This will be handy for going to war with Moose.
Re: (Score:3)
i know more than a few hundreds fellow canadians that would love the opportunity to burn your white house down again
Don't flatter yourself. That was the British, who were your masters.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The Queen [has] a delegate who [has] no power what-so-ever...
So how does the Canadian system handle a double dissolution? - Not saying you're wrong, I'm genuinely interested because here in Oz it's the job of the Queen (as represented by the GG) to force a new general election should one be required to break a budgetary deadlock. Surely you don't use the idiotic government IOU's the US uses to work around the occasional budgetary deadlocks brought on by zealous ideologues staring each other down in the house and senate?
Note that the Aussie GG is appointed by the A
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He is wrong:
http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4102779&cid=44606969 [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
The Queen have [sic] a delegate who have [sic] no power what-so-ever
Incorrect. A recent example is BC's Lieutenant Governor Lam, who stated he would have removed Premier van der Zalm from office, had van der Zalm not resigned.
During a recent federal election, when the polls suggested a possible NDP / Liberal coalition the question was raised to to whom the Governor General would select as Prime Minister - The minority house leader, or the coalition leader. The GG would, in effect, select Her Majesty'
Re: (Score:2)
Judging from the amount of education you've demonstrated, you're lucky if you can dress yourself in the morning.
Remember something Canadians, you exist only because the US allows it
This from someone whose entire nation only exists because the French allowed it.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Quonset hut, you fucking retard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quonset_hut [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Easier than breeding stealth horses...
Re: (Score:2)
There are Wankel-type sleds, but I think to say that they are the norm is misleading in the extreme. I don't think I've ever seen one that wasn't either a two or four stroke piston engine.
Are there even Wankel engines that have seals good enough for EPA/CARB besides that gem in the Mazda RX-8?
Re: (Score:2)
Point me to a wankel snowmobile? Most are 2 stroke, 2 and 3 cylinder piston engines.