Detroit Wants Its Own High-Tech Visa 398
dcblogs writes "Detroit, a city in bankruptcy and dealing with a shrinking population, hopes to turn itself around with the help of 50,000 employment-based green cards. In exchange for the visa, an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time. The visas would be made available under the EB-2 visa category, a visa for advanced degree professionals or those deemed with 'exceptional ability' in the sciences, arts and business. The proposal was made by Michigan's governor, Rick Snyder. Daniel Costa, an immigration policy analyst at Economic Policy Institute, said Snyder would have more credibility on the issue if he were doing more to help workers in Detroit. In 2011, the state cut jobless benefits by six weeks to 20. 'I also think the federal government should be offering people in the U.S. some money and land in Detroit if they'll move there,' said Costa, or 'just offer it to people across the country who have advanced degrees.'"
The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Funny)
...a familiar lifestyle for people from third-world countries with high crime, corrupt cops and crumbling infrastructure.
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Interesting)
The city has been terribly managed for decades. I'm not sure what ground Costa has on criticizing Governor Snyder here though.. the city was given years to clean up its act and didn't really do anything of note, so he only recently stepped in to get the city managed by competent people using Michigan's "emergency manager" laws. They city needs a rapid rise in tax base or a bailout.. since Americans aren't exactly flocking to Detroit (even though property is cheap and employment is available if you have skill) and bail out money isn't to be had, pleading for immigrant help isn't exactly off base. It's not even Snyder's original idea, this has been floated for awhile now.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And nothing that Detroit has to offer except being close to Canada would appeal to me, and that's just not enough. Doesn't matter what they pay me or what conditions that are offered, it's probably safer to go to Afghanistan anyway.
Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit (Score:5, Insightful)
And nothing that Detroit has to offer except being close to Canada would appeal to me, and that's just not enough.
I'm pretty sure you've never actually spent any time in Detroit or you'd realize what you just said is very ignorant. Yes Detroit has its problems but it's hardly the hell hole it is made out to be. There are excellent employers, plenty of entertainment within easy reach, great restaurants, and more. Plus you have easy access to the Great Lakes, Michigan and Canada which are all amazing. I could easily see myself living in downtown Detroit under the right circumstances. I live not far from Detroit as it is and I go downtown regularly. Like any big city it has its nicer areas and other areas you probably should steer away from. People go downtown all the time for sporting events (Lions, Tigers and Red Wings), cultural events (DIA), casinos, restaurants and more.
Re:Shut up unless you've actually lived in Detroit (Score:5, Insightful)
I have lived in Detroit and paying an extra tax so that I have no police, no fire department, no streetlights, no security, no infrastructure and unplowed streets is just not appealing. Especially when you can live 8 or more miles north to live in a better area without the drawbacks or the extra tax.
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:4, Insightful)
This is at best a band aid on a gaping wound.
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Interesting)
Portland suffered through this fate many years ago. There is one thing that will put Detroit back on the map, something California and Texas do not have...
Fresh water. Chip plants need it, businesses require this to run. When the major aquifers dry up and make sunbelt areas extremely expensive to live in (barring an advance in desalination, and even then, trying to pump that water inland), Detroit, and Michigan in general, will be relevant again. No water worries, fairly stable terrain (no earthquakes), worst issue might be blizzards.
I'd give Detroit a couple years for it to reach its nadir, because the one-two punch of a continual drought combined with the extreme populations trying to live in desert will eventually cause an exodus back to the northern climates, as that will be where the companies relocate and where the jobs will be.
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's the Republicans' fault that Detroit is in the state that it's in?
Detroit has had one-party Democrat rule for more than two generations.
Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Insightful)
Republican politicians were neither 'the' nor 'a' reason Detroit was mis-managed. Literal decades after decades of single-party rule robbed the locals of any need for their politicians to defend/justify their actions, so they went off the rails in a spectacular fashion.
The ONLY blame you can heap on Republicans in Detroit would be for letting the Democrats run the city by failing to win more elections... But are we really going to blame the loser of an election for the actions of the winner?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd make the argument that you can, at least in part... If the Republicans could put forth a/some candidate(s) that weren't so damned extreme, they might have had a chance at providing a counter-balance to the Democrats that have allegedly managed to run Detroit into the ground...
Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Informative)
counter-balance to the Democrats that have allegedly managed to run Detroit into the ground...
"allegedly" ???
Its a fact that Detroit was run into the ground, and its also a fact that the Democrats ran the city for literally 5 contiguous decades.
You seem to be hypothesizing that Detroit might have been run into the ground by people that werent making any of the decisions there, rather than the people that were. Interesting blindfold you have.
Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:4, Insightful)
Combine this with Detroit being a one industry town that got hurt bad when that industry faced a downturn. Seattle used to have much the same problem in that Boeing was the big employer. When it had problems the city had problems.
Detroit has a lot of problems.
1. Corruption. The city government and unions are both corrupt and mutually reenforcing. Make Michigan a right to work state. The unions have not done a good job keeping people working.
2. Crime. The level of crime in Detroit is several times the nation average and is a lot worse than San Francisco which also has an issue with Crime. Here is the comparison between Detroit and San Francisco http://www.areavibes.com/crime... [areavibes.com]
The easy solution for Detroit would be a lot of money. Start tearing down parts of the city and building green spaces Keep expanding the people mover and M1 street car line for better transportation and extend them to the universities, the airport and so on. Fiber to the door every where, offer incentives for people to build homes and apartments. Do not forget the well light sidewalks and bike paths. The problem is all that takes money which Detroit does not have.
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Informative)
I don't know if Detroit will ever be "important" again, but Michigan as a whole has more going for it than former automotive plants, and "fresh water" only hints at it. That water's good for more than just drinking and industrial uses, after all: it's important for agriculture and has a whole lot of recreational potential too. The whole belt west of metro Detroit (and a bit to the north) is good for a variety of farming. North of that are countless forested lakes and rivers which are great for fishing and canoeing. And then there are the Great Lakes themselves, which have seasonal sandy beaches (think "California without the saltwater"), and are good for boating and also fishing. Lonely Planet listed Michigan's west coast and nearby Grand Rapids as their "top travel destination" for 2014, which is admittedly hype, but reflects well on the state's potential economic future, regardless of Detroit and the auto industry.
Re: (Score:2)
republican stripping away representation for all but about 50,000 people, no industry...
I'll agree with you on all but the above. I grew up in the city, and still visit occasionally. You'll need a lot of bulldozers, some new industries, and government to lower the outrageous taxes the city has.
Detroit Metro (not City) is a nice place to live (Score:5, Informative)
actually we can do it now with desalination, no advancement really needed.
Not economically. Industrial scale desalinization is still far too expensive to be practical in most places.
", Detroit, and Michigan in general, will be relevant again"
nope, never happen. Crappy weather, high crime, republican stripping away representation for all but about 50,000 people, no industry... nothing really.
I have news for you. The Detroit Metro area is relevant NOW and has been for a long time. Don't confuse Detroit City with the greater Detroit metropolitan area. Detroit City has its problems and they'll take a while to solve but relatively few people live and work there. About 680,000 people live in Detroit City versus about 3,700,000 in the suburbs. Oakland county [wikipedia.org] immediately to the north of Detroit City is one of the 10 wealthiest counties in the entire US, has a AAA bond rating (the highest possible) and 60% of the Fortune 500 have facilities in the county. It's a genuinely nice place to live - I should know because I live there. When most people say they are "from Detroit" what most really mean is that they live in Detroit Metro, ie the suburbs.
No industry? Hah! Michigan is still the beating heart of manufacturing in the US. The amount of manufacturing that goes on here is astonishing even with the auto industry problems. And it isn't just making cars. Not by a long shot. The number of engineers and high tech jobs here is only exceeded by 3 or 4 cities in the entire US. (do you have any idea how much technology goes into making cars?)
Oh and the weather is only "crappy" for part of the year if you can't handle snow. Spring, summer and fall in Michigan are gorgeous and so is winter once you get outdoors and move around. Personally I like to go skiing, snowshoeing, and skating and Michigan is terrific for outdoor activities year round. Within a 10 mile radius of my house I have over 16,000 acres of public parks with every outdoor activity imaginable available to me. Horse riding, skiing, running, biking, sailing, kayaking, golf, hiking, camping, etc. You name it I can be doing it (season permitting) within 30 minutes.
Re: (Score:3)
The smart companies will move further south because Detroit is one of the few places in the US where you go south to get to Canada.
Re: (Score:3)
Detroit doesn't have nearly the bad winter conditions that Buffalo has. That said, Buffalo doesn't have near the crime that Detroit does.
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:4)
Lakes Michigan and Superior have seen a small drop over the last 20 years, which likely depends on overall precipitation. Others have not. From Wikipedia: The source of water levels in the lakes is tied to what was left by melting glaciers when the lakes took their present form. Annually, only about 1% is "new" water originating from rivers, precipitation, and groundwater springs that drain into the lakes. This is balanced by evaporation and drainage, making the level of the lakes historically constant.[10]
As for pollution, do you have any references? I'd argue that the lakes have gotten cleaner since the 70s, but I don't have evidence other than my own visuals.
Useful water level link below shows history back to the 1800s.
http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data... [noaa.gov]
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:4, Interesting)
You think the great lakes are inexhaustible fresh water?
Inexhaustible? Nope. But they are vast and very few other places on earth have anything like them. The Great Lakes have around 84% of the surface fresh water in the US. Like any resource it needs careful tending but folks who don't live around the Great Lakes don't really grasp how big they are. They properly should be termed inland Seas. With the possible exception of the Mississippi river watershed there is no more important source of water in the entire US. It's no exaggeration to say that the economy of the US and Canada would be greatly diminished without them.
Also, they are getting more and more polluted and more and more water is being removed each year
Actually the lakes have been getting significantly cleaner for the past few decades. Had you spent any effort looking you would find copious evidence proving that fact. I've lived around the great lakes for most of my life so I've seen it first hand. Lake Erie was a lot more polluted when I was a child than it is today.
Lake Michigan and Huron are historically low but it is still within the range of normal and has been more or less steady for the past several years. Water level in the lakes fluctuate by as much as several feet from year to year normally. People do divert water (particularly around Chicago) but the Great Lakes Compact [wikipedia.org] will largely prevent any mass removal of water from the watershed.
Re: (Score:2)
...a familiar lifestyle for people from third-world countries with high crime, corrupt cops and crumbling infrastructure.
Add "required to live and work there", and you have created the US version of the 21st-century ghetto. Congratulations.
Re: (Score:2)
Detroit already is one big 21st-century ghetto... blight, ruined buildings, rampant crime, and rampant iPhones
Re: (Score:2)
The city government has third world-style corruption, too, with pay to play for contracts and sham charities run by family members where you "donate", and some sister or child gets $100k/year to "manage", on top of "renting" a room in their house to it for work for a bargain of $4500/mo.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So just like LA, NYC, SF, etc...
With the possible exception of infrastructure, you obviously don't know jack about LA, NYC or SF. In case your name is Rip van Winkle, crime rates have been steadily declining for the last 20 years. Maybe you're worried about hippies too. Sorry, but none have been seen in the wild since the 1970's (and they were passe then).
Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:3)
Don't worry, DeBlassio will reverse the drop in crime rates...
Re: The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:4, Informative)
People say that every time someone who isn't considered "tough on crime" gets elected, but the statistics often tell a different story. People say Giuliani did a great job of reducing crime, but the precipitious drop actually started under Dinkins [wikipedia.org] (who also started a lot of the "broken windows" policies). The steep decline continued after Giuliani appointed Bratton PC, but then started to decrease after 2 years when Giuliani fired Bratton. Note that the LA crime rate started dropping faster after Bratton became PC there. Later Giuliani appointed Kerik the crook as PC, despite almost all advice being against it.
Giuliani, like all politicians, takes credit for everything good during his administration, and denies responsibility for anything bad. If you want to know what led to NYC's decline in crime during that era, the objective evidence says it had little to do Giuliani. Rather the tree big factors are.
1. Overall national drop in crime rate (the reasons for which are a major debate).
2. Bratton
3. Dinkins
Re:The real point of what Detroit has to offer... (Score:5, Funny)
Who needs hippies when you are drowning in hipsters? (This is officially my 1000th and final hipster joke ever. Rejoice!)
I was making hipster jokes before they were cool.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
But now it's ironic.
Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed (Score:5, Insightful)
Here's the problem with importing more and more workers: They're going to get fucked by the Big Boys just like the rest of is. I have no illusions about this.
How about Dan Costa's idea? If the feds want Detroit to live, offer business grants to get people to open up shop there, give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you've had enough decades of "fewer people=fewer problems" as an attempt to improve things.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you've had enough decades of "fewer people=fewer problems" as an attempt to improve things.
I'm not sure I get what you're laying down; how would importing foreigners to work in Detroit improve things for the millions of people living there already, moreso than encouraging Americans to do the same?
Re: (Score:2)
Because the people left in Detroit are trapped in a cycle of poverty, mostly with no real prospects due to lack of education(or they'd have moved out to someplace that would pay for their skills)? Every city has that problem, it's just usually bolstered by a more robust economy to help pull people out. The lack of employable people keeps employers away. The lack of employers keeps people from training for jobs they could have. And all that remains is a sense of desperation and crime.
The neoclassical pos
Re: (Score:3)
Because the people left in Detroit are trapped in a cycle of poverty, mostly with no real prospects due to lack of education(or they'd have moved out to someplace that would pay for their skills)? Every city has that problem, it's just usually bolstered by a more robust economy to help pull people out. The lack of employable people keeps employers away. The lack of employers keeps people from training for jobs they could have. And all that remains is a sense of desperation and crime.
I think the crime is more of a deterrent to rebirth than lack of skilled and educated workers - you don't have to be that smart or learned to be a 'process handler' in a manufacturing setting. Of course, to bring manufacturing back to Detroit would mean that our government would have to modify or cancel a lot of those "free trade agreements" that our 'leaders' have, personally, profited from enacting.
Detroit isn't dying because the people living there suddenly decided being criminals was better than working
Re: (Score:2)
My case: the root issue isn't fixable.
Re: (Score:3)
My case: the root issue isn't fixable.
With a collective attitude like that, you're probably right.
We, as a nation, need a sea change from "selfish assholism" to "helping each other out, because if we all win, we're all winners."
Re: (Score:3)
It's addressable but that's not the same as fixable*. Human problems aren't going away.
*this claim is applicable to current tech levels, and social mores. It's possible to perceive a world where you can fix everything, a la star trek. I'm not arguing hypotheticals.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe if the city hadn't taxed the shit out of those with income, they wouldn't have left. Then again, maybe they would with the terrible schools, and high crime rate. Detroit isn't like "Every city", it's worse, and won't get better until the corruption in local government is cleaned up.
Re: (Score:2)
And you think being run down and desperate is going to make them less corrupt?
Re: (Score:2)
Personally I say let it die, scrape the ruins into a big ditch and make it the dump for the rest of the US. That would be an improvement.
Re: (Score:2)
If you can't get the people already there to be productive import them!
The question is, has anyone tried? Or is this one of those "searching for unicorns" situations, like when Microsoft begs Uncle Sam for more H1B visa workers, claiming they can't find any Americans qualified and willing to do the work?
Personally I say let it die, scrape the ruins into a big ditch and make it the dump for the rest of the US. That would be an improvement.
Fine for you.
I like to fix things, and I don't like to give up. Call it a quirk.
Re: (Score:3)
give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.
So I like the idea but it's kind of a chicken vs egg thing.
High tech companies need HIGHLY skilled workers. Most of the unemployed autoworkers in Detroit are not highly skilled.
So unless you are including in your proposal a big training budget (and that's assuming people have the desire and or aptitude to become highly skilled) it won't work.
However, there are a number of support roles (like garbage collection and construction) that are NOT highly skilled but that will go up as people get imported. Think
Re: (Score:3)
give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.
So I like the idea but it's kind of a chicken vs egg thing.
High tech companies need HIGHLY skilled workers. Most of the unemployed autoworkers in Detroit are not highly skilled.
Why does it have to be "high tech companies" and "HIGHLY skilled workers?" Why can't we, as a nation, demand that our government stop allowing corporations to outsource our jobs to indentured servants in other countries?
Hell, if I had the capital, do you know what business I know I could start and run successfully in Detroit? A firearms manufacturing plant - nobody needs a degree to be a machinist or forklift operator, plus it's not like there'd be a shortage of customers.
Would I prefer to start my own car
more importantly, SMALL business grants! (Score:2)
offer business grants to get people to open up shop there, give the existing population work (instead of just importing more people), and give them the opportunity to lift themselves out of poverty.
More importantly, give them SMALL business grants, so that Detroit develops a very diverse economy, and you have lots of 2, 3, 10, 50 employee companies that are providing a diversity of services. Even better, give priority to non-franchises so the money stays in the local economy (and the country, for that ma
Re: (Score:2)
Super insightful commentary. SuperBanana.
With the constant drone of 'jobs, jobs, jobs,' I think we often forget that there's much more to life than working.
Re:Give Us Opportunity, Not More Mouths to Feed (Score:5, Insightful)
The idea that big business=everything is bullshit and backward. Big business is not supporting life in the US any longer and hasn't for years.
The idea is to make your city and town a place that isn't a hellhole for the creative. Stop giving tax abatements to huge corporations that are actually employing few workers and who are often seeing NEGATIVE taxation. Start giving some help to the small businesses instead of the big ones.
Of course this takes deep thinking and common sense which are at all time lows in the USA right now.
Re: (Score:2)
Open up shops to do what? Shops usually depend don't here buying a large employer to have a income base high enough to support shops.
You seem lack an understanding of the colloquialism, "to open up shop," as well as having a very limited definition of the term, "shop"
Probably not a lot of profit to be had for 'boutique' shops, but there are auto shops, carpentry shops, metalworking shops, etc., that would be quite viable in a place like The Motor City, regardless of it's current condition.
And if you have a high tech degree, why would you want to start a business there? VC practically don't exist, you contemporaries are all on the coast.
Right - why would foreigners with high-tech degrees want to start a business in Detroit? At least as Americans, we have a somewhat vested interest in k
Re: (Score:2)
Please, do tell us how the region of Detroit is going to attract money, thereby lifting the longterm level of wealth, when your plan is to just poor some money into it for a couple of year.
Assuming you went to school there, I'd drop some serious bucks on increasing the quality of education, specifically in the 'spelling and grammar' arenas. Sheesh.
Detroit got poor because they were no longer attracting money via the car industry. Tell us how your plan deals with the source of the problems, not the symptoms of their results.
"Became" poor, not "got."
Despite an obvious paucity of English education, you already named the solution: Bring the manufacturing jobs back. Really, is there any reason Ford makes car parts in Mexico, other than to help a small handful of people secure shit-tons of personal wealth? It's not like outsourcing made cars any cheaper.
But hey, it doesn't
50 thousand new residents (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
doing what? Haven't most people left because there aren't enough jobs? You want to pay off your debts, charge people an exit tax.
Shhh ... they might be listening!
Re: (Score:2)
Looking for how the feds can help (Score:2)
It seems like a default position for state and municipal politicians to primarily look at how the federal government can help them. If anybody should pay people to come to Detroit, shouldn't it be Detroit or Michigan?
The visa issue has to be federal, of course.
Unemployment rate 17,7% (Score:5, Interesting)
As we well know, 17.7% means that these are the number of people on the eligible list of unemployment benefits...which they just cut to 20 weeks. So, it doesn't include the number of people who never found a job while they were on unemployment and now have neither a job nor can collect unemployment.
Re:Unemployment rate 17,7% (Score:5, Insightful)
I think the idea is that if they have visas to hand out to companies, the companies will be willing to put offices in Detroit for those people to work in. From there, services will be needed from the lower-skill people in the area, think food service, etc. This will then eat into the 17.1% unemployment. The problem isn't the number of workers but the type and skill of the workers, and getting things back in balance. I'm not sure this is the right solution to the problem, but I am willing to consider that it may be A solution to the problem for now.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the idea is that if they have visas to hand out to companies, the companies will be willing to put offices in Detroit for those people to work in. From there, services will be needed from the lower-skill people in the area, think food service, etc. This will then eat into the 17.1% unemployment. The problem isn't the number of workers but the type and skill of the workers, and getting things back in balance. I'm not sure this is the right solution to the problem, but I am willing to consider that it may be A solution to the problem for now.
No doubt there are qualified Americans who would be willing to live and work in the Detroit area (somewhere around there anyway) if they were sufficiently financially motivated.
This is just another ploy for American corporations to pay as little as possible to their workers.
Re: (Score:2)
So basically the theory is "We should have the same kind of indentured servants that Silicon Valley has, se we can impress our corporate overlords enough that they'll throw some crumbs our way!"
That doesn't work so long as there's another country willing to bend over backwards for its corporate overlords in a way that the US isn't: Environmental and labor safety laws - who needs 'em?
Re: (Score:3)
It's the 21st Century my good man, it's time you put aside this notion of "trying something different" -- if not employing people local to Detroit caused the problem, in the 21st Century we try again to "not employ people."
I thought if you watched TV you would learn that "beating a dead horse" was our national pastime.
Re: (Score:3)
You don't seem to understand the modern progressive outlook for the Western World.
Western people should only do interesting work or government work.
Everything else is built upon mass immigration from the developing world who will do the work Western people don't want to do (for a variety of reason... low pay, too much technical training for the pay, no job security, too much risk...).
Then you tax the immigrants and use it to provide welfare for the Western people unable to do interesting or government work.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not only left Detroit, but left the state. Michigan is a job desert and has been since 2001. Grand Rapids is now the largest city and has some opportunities but only in Medical. The whole state is swirling the toilet and has been for over 2 decades due to the worthless leadership we have had in the past 3 governors and elected officials.
Lansing is a toilet, Everything south of lansing is worse (Flint included), and everything up I-75 to the bridge is also dead or dying. Saginaw is a cesspool as bad as
Colonialism??? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program? It seems awfully familiar to what the Brits did to/in India during the 1800s (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_indenture_system)
Actually it's exactly like indentureed servitude and it's been done long before the 1800's.
I suppose it's legal since these folks will be volunteers.
In the United States, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (VTVPA) of 2000 extended servitude to cover peonage as well as Involuntary Servitude.
Re:Colonialism??? (Score:5, Interesting)
Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program?
Yes. This whole idea is completely contrary to the American ideal of immigration. A permanent resident visa should is, should be, and always has been, for the entire country. You should no more be able to stop immigrants from moving anywhere in the country they want, than you should citizens. Something about the Constitution making this a united country, and the federal government controlling immigration.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program?
Yes. This whole idea is completely contrary to the American ideal of immigration. A permanent resident visa should is, should be, and always has been, for the entire country. You should no more be able to stop immigrants from moving anywhere in the country they want, than you should citizens. Something about the Constitution making this a united country, and the federal government controlling immigration.
No, it actually isn't that much of a stretch. We have visas that tie residency to a certain company sponsoring the visa. If you change companies before citizenship becomes available, the new company has to sponsor you (which many companies don't care to do). So effectively the person is tied to that company in most cases. Tying a person to a specific geographical area isn't that much of a reach, but it is a terrible idea. Each desperate location will offer bigger and bigger incentives, create a race to
Re: (Score:2)
Permanent Resident and Visa are two different things.
H-1B Visas are tied to a company, and legally you're bound to the company that got it for you. If they fire you, you have about 2 weeks to leave the country as the visa automatically expires. (Which seems in line with the proposed idea, just you'll have the visa not as long as you remain in the company, but rather in the state, however, another company can pick that visa up and renew it and you can move around).
Permanent residency is not actually a visa a
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program? It seems awfully familiar to what the Brits did to/in India during the 1800s (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_indenture_system)
Except that presumably these immigrants would have the right to leave Detroit (and the USA) whenever they want.
Re: (Score:2)
Right, and then just like in Tejas / Texas, they'll marry the local people, then have a revolt and join the uh...union? Chinese search engine Baidu is interested in expanding internationally. The trans-revolutionary name of Detroit, Michigan will be: Meng Tan tian, Daihatsu -- The former means something like flat, smooth, quiet, peaceful in Chinese; The latter is a Japanese automaker (note that the 'first' and 'last' names get swapped around).
The manufacturing we once relied on Detroit's for is now done o
Re: (Score:2)
Most visa programs have similar requirements, globally. For the most part, if you are not a refugee or special circumstance, and a country lets you come work, they want you to be contributing to the economy (not moving in and then immediately onto the dole).
Most likely the terms of the visa are that you can go back home, but you can't stay in the US if you choose to leave Detroit (unlike the indentured servant program)
Re: (Score:2)
I've heard of this idea before. (Score:2)
solutions (Score:2, Funny)
They should build walls around the city so their remaining citizens cannot leave.
They're *educated* foreigners (Score:4, Insightful)
How are you going to convince someone with an advanced degree to settle in effing Detroit? They are going to want to escape the poverty of the third world!
The problem facing Detroit is not a lack of people with advanced degrees. The problem is decades of life under a corrupt mayor, high crime, crushing taxes, over-regulation, and shitty weather.
The situation is improving a lot lately, but it has a long way to go. You can't solve this overnight by issuing a bunch of visas. Detroit needs to get serious about redevelopment, crime prevention, and attracting business. Once there are good jobs there, you'll have plenty of Americans with advanced degrees going there. I don't have to remind you that we're in the midst of a "jobless recovery".
All of these things are happening already. It's just a slow process to undo decades of mismanagement.
Re:They're *educated* foreigners (Score:5, Insightful)
1. There are a lot of jobs there right now. Seriously, go to monster and search for engineering jobs in Detroit and Ann Arbor.
2. The cost of living is ridiculously low. We are talking great 3-4 bedroom houses in nice areas for around 250k. In most tech job locations around the country (Boston, Silicon Valley, etc), this doesn't buy you squat. other things are much cheaper too, like food and gas compared to where I am living now.
3. I still have family there, so it would be nice to be able to make a quick drive to see my relatives.
Now that said, there is certainly a certain type of person they are looking for in these jobs that makes getting past the HR filters difficult. Many of open positions are looking for people that have had automotive experience before, which I don't have. So in spite of having many of the other qualifications, I think that I will have a difficult time for this reason alone.
And I hate to have to say this over and over again to people, but Detroit is just one city in the area. While I agree that Detroit has been mismanaged, the rest of the area is quite nice and look forward to moving back someday.
Re: (Score:2)
I grew up in what most people would call Detroit. More specifically, in the Detroit metropolitan area.
Speaking as someone who has never lived in Michigan, I do not think of Farmington Hills when someone says "Detroit". When someone says "Detroit", I think of Detroit, the city. If they say Detroit metro area, that means something completely different to me.
Also, I didn't read from the article that it was about attracting people to work outside the city limits. My reading was that it was for Detroit proper, to help in the city's redevelopment.
Many of open positions are looking for people that have had automotive experience before, which I don't have.
I know that you have zero control over this, but I thought I'd give
the numbers don't work out on this (Score:2)
There are about 150,000 EB-2 visas given out every year. 1/3 of those are going to go to Detroit? Maybe they'll increase the total by 50k just for Detroit, that would still be 1/4 of the granted EB-2 visas. There is tremendous demand for these, and someone (a US business) usually pays for the substantial legal bills for the application. The people who get these visas don't grow on trees, it's probably the most competitive one you can go for, depending on where you're from. I've known experienced scienti
High Tech VISA (Score:2)
They should talk to Bank Of America, or Citi
They have cards with the new chip technology to prevent fraud
What am I missing? (Score:4, Insightful)
Am I missing something here? Who are these 50,000 people supposed to work for? The article vaguely mentions them, "opening businesses", but I have to ask, open businesesses doing what?
They should pay people to move OUT of Detroit (Score:2)
Help people get a new start in another city with more job opportunities, don't bring in more people when unemployment there is so high.
What will they do? (Score:3)
There's a lot of decay in Detroit, so much so that it's unattractive to new businesses. Even if you get get more workers into Detroit, what would they do for a living? Plow down more blocks of vacant, dilapidated houses? As has been said here, the unemployment rate in Detroit is in the high teens and if there's ever going to be a re-birth, what has to happen is that businesses need to be able to move back into Detroit and that requires a solid government and a solid infrastructure otherwise you may just as well bulldoze the rest down.
Escape route to Canada (Score:4, Funny)
I think Costa missed a big selling point for Detroit - proximity to Canada. If things keep getting worse instead of better, you're only a bridge away from Windsor, Ontario, Canada! Mexicans upset with low employment and poverty go North and cross the border for a better in the States. That same option is available to us! Southern Ontario has the same climate as Detroit, nicer people, generic drugs, and way less gun and violent crime. Sounds like a solution to me!
(The thing is - even I don't know if know if I'm joking or not...)
Real barrier (Score:2)
Yeah, because the only thing keeping people out of Detroit now is high land prices!
High-Tech visas? In Detroit? (Score:2)
Sweet, I've always wanted Robocop to be real.
Federal govt give away land? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Probably he wants the federal government to buy that land :-(
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I know this is an unfamiliar concept in the US, but the people in Detroit are in need and require help from the rest of the country. Their city structure is designed for a much larger population. Now the city must undergo a large transformation. First, it must be determined what the future for Detroit should be, otherwise it will end in chaos. Second, if the government and police are corrupt, this corruption must be ended. Third, initiatives to support start-ups and new businesses must be launched to suppor
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Detroit is a city, but it is far from being an essential resource. If it imploded tomorrow, I doubt it would be more than an interesting news tidbit for the rest of the nation.
Finally, it's cl
Re: (Score:2)
Beside freedom people have also other rights, which you seem to have forgotten. Anyway, the people still living in Detroit do so, because they cannot just leave. Either these people have a job and not the prospect of getting one elsewhere or they have not the resources to move. So while the administration in Detroit messed up, the people still living their have to pay for it. On a side note, there is something called compassion. You cannot let them die, just because they are unable to solve their present cr
Re: (Score:3)
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
This means our rights are NOT well enumerated, and some of those things you say are not a right could be.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For any company I would say yes let it die. But in this case the city was fucked up by industry and the local administration and now the people of Detroit have to suffer. So yes they have to start over, but someone has to help them. Furthermore, a totally abandoned Detroit would be a environmental hazard. Someone has to clean up.
Re:Why should Detroit get special treatment? (Score:5, Interesting)
You obviously don't know your own car makers do you? I grew up in North America, but live in Europe. Want to know a dirty little secret? I can get reliable low gas requirement AMERICAN cars in Europe. Around 1999 we bought a Jeep Wrangler and then took it to Canada. Since it was NORTH AMERICAN built we could import the car without problems. What was interesting was that the Jeep dealership who had to do some minor changes spent nearly 1.5 hours inspecting the car. We thought something was wrong and asked how come they took so long. Answer, "your Wrangler is Awesome it has so many efficiency features and electronics that I have never seen on sale here."
I recently had a discussion about this with an American and the problem is not the American car makers, but Americans. They want from their American car makers BIG FAT engines with BIG FAT chassis. Americans are not willing to go for the reliable low gas requirements cars because they are "wimpy" cars. The cars I drive here are American built and they are not wimpy. They might not have 600 HP, but who the frig cares since it is not that useful anyways. And even less useful in America...
Go figure, eh!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Try driving from Los Angeles to Chicago in a tiny car some time. Midwest and western united states there is a ton of space between locations. Trying to do that in a tiny car does not work.
I'm not sure I understand your argument. What about small cars makes them unsuitable for traveling long distances?
When I was in college, I owned a Toyota Tercel, a very small car. Drove everywhere with it, without a problem. I have driven from Michigan to Texas with it multiple times.
If anything they're better since they tend to get better gas mileage. Or you arguing they small cars are uncomfortable? Well, then that's a subjective thing that brings little to the discussion at hand.
Re: (Score:2)
Mod parent up!
When I lived in the Netherlands I bought a Ford Focus. Far from being a "cheap" car, it cost 30,000 EUR, and was BEAUTIFUL (and definitely comparable in driving ability to a BMW 3 series or other similar).
My friends from the US were floored when they took a ride in it...
Re:Glorious Detroit! (Score:5, Insightful)
Not just handouts - public employee unions (Score:3, Informative)
Look at how much of Democratic campaigns are funded by contributions from public employee unions.
We now have a government by the government for the government. AKA the Democratic Party.
Re: (Score:2)
but the offer of free handouts is a tough one to campaign against.
Yes, it is rather surprising how enticing food is when you are unemployed at home with kids, no work and no prospect of employment. Funny that.
The GOP could come with proposals such as retraining and plans to move people out of economically depressed areas which are unlikely to recover, or they could sit in a posh country club and rally against the 43% moochers.
If you do so, just don't come and act surprised then that we don't vote for your invective and vindictive party.
Re: (Score:2)
Ok.. provide the citation!
Just because it is contradictory in your brain doesn't mean that is what reality is.
Really... go ahead. Show the citation that unemployment benefits increases unemployment. You won't do it because the data show exactly the opposite!
Re: (Score:2)
At some point, if you can't find a job, you need for the greater good to settle for what you can find. For example, after the construction bubble popped in housing, should we just keep construction workers on permanent unemployment? Or should we encourage them to do something different with their lives?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)